Technologies
Facebook to Meta: A new name but the same old problems
Plagued by scandals, Facebook rebrands itself as Meta. The tech giant still must earn back our trust.
Facebook’s iconic thumbs-up sign at its Menlo Park, California, headquarters now bears a blue infinity-shaped symbol along with a new name: Meta.
The corporate rebranding, unveiled Thursday at Facebook’s Connect conference, is part of Facebook’s headlong sprint into the metaverse, a virtual environment where people could work, play, learn and socialize with one another. CEO Mark Zuckerberg called the metaverse, which at this point is largely hypothetical, “the successor to the mobile internet.”
In barreling headlong into the metaverse, however, Facebook may be repeating the practices that got it into trouble in the first place. The company’s former mantra — “Move fast and break things” — encouraged a culture that rewarded new ideas without careful consideration of the risks. The metaverse will create an entirely new environment for Facebook’s legacy problems to take root.
Facebook’s hard-charging attitude has contributed to it racking up a seemingly endless list of scandals around data privacy, hate speech and misinformation. It’s been blamed for destroying democracy and for body shaming. The company’s latest controversy, which involves leaked documents gathered by former Facebook product manager Frances Haugen, has proved especially damaging. Haugen alleges the company has misled the public and investors about its role in perpetuating hate speech, misinformation and other harmful content.
Facebook denies the accusations, noting that it has more than 40,000 people working on safety and security. About 3.58 billion people use Facebook and its services every month.
Analysts say a clever rebranding won’t help Facebook distance itself from its many problems.
“A name change doesn’t suddenly erase the systemic issues plaguing the company,” Forrester vice president and research director Mike Proulx said in a statement. “If Meta doesn’t address its issues beyond a defensive and superficial attitude, those same issues will occupy the metaverse.”
Forrester, which surveyed 745 people across the US, Canada and the UK, said 75% of those polled disagreed that a new company name will increase their trust in Facebook.
The company says the rebranding is a refocusing of its corporate priorities. Founded in 2004 in a Harvard dorm room, Facebook has spread beyond its roots as a social network. The tech giant now has virtual reality headsets, smart glasses and video chat devices. It’s also dabbling in finance with its Novi cryptocurrency wallet.
During the Connect keynote, Zuckerberg said he’s well aware of the risks that come with entering a new field. Facebook doesn’t have a great track record when it comes to protecting the privacy and safety of its users, and those issues won’t vanish in the metaverse.
“Every chapter brings new voices and new ideas but also new challenges, risks and disruption of established interests,” he said. “We’ll need to work together, from the beginning, to bring the best possible version of this future to life.”
A future utopia or dystopia?
Zuckerberg’s presentation painted a hopeful vision of the metaverse, filled with digital spaces for people to gather. Friends could fence using virtual swords, attend concerts from their homes or simply work together in virtual offices.
But Facebook will also have to deal with the same issues it grapples with on social media, including data privacy, security, child-exploitation dangers, and content moderation. Misinformation has been a widespread problem on Facebook’s namesake social network. Lies that spread on the platform have been blamed for the Jan. 6 insurrection and for hesitancy to get COVID vaccinations.
That wasn’t lost on lawmakers, who’ve been studying ways to regulate the company and its Big Tech peers.
“Meta as in ‘we are a cancer to democracy metastasizing into a global surveillance and propaganda machine for boosting authoritarian regimes and destroying civil society… for profit!'” tweeted Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from New York.
Sens. Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, and Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, also warned Zuckerberg a name change wouldn’t deter lawmakers from pursuing Facebook. The two senators lead a subcommittee that recently met with Haugen to discuss her concerns about the social network.
Virtual worlds existed long before Facebook ramped up investment in VR and augmented reality after its purchase of headset maker Oculus in 2014. And the world of virtual reality already has a harassment problem. In 2007, Belgian police were looking into whether an avatar allegedly raped another character in Second Life, a virtual world developed by Linden Lab, according to The Washington Post.
Andrew “Boz” Bosworth, who’ll become the company’s new chief technology officer in 2022, said in a video chat before the conference that muting another user could help give people more control over their surroundings in VR if they’re being harassed. Facebook is also exploring ideas such as allowing users to share with authorities the last 10 to 15 seconds of a VR interaction they’ve had with another person. The company, though, will have to weigh the trade-offs between privacy and user safety, a dilemma it’s confronted before with end-to-end encrypted chats on messaging apps.
Another issue that may pop up is the use of avatars to impersonate others. One solution could be tying the avatar to an authenticated account or verifying identity in some other way.
A new name, however, won’t help Facebook dodge its old problems. Lawmakers, celebrities and critics took swings at the company after its big reveal.
“Changing their name doesn’t change reality: Facebook is destroying our democracy and is the world’s leading peddler of disinformation and hate,” said the Real Facebook Oversight Board, a group of well-known critics. “Their meaningless name change should not distract from the investigation, regulation and real, independent oversight needed to hold Facebook accountable.”
Technologies
Scaramucci admits he caught ‘Potomac fever’ in the White House â and says Bessent and Lutnick are infected too
…
… full article text …
Technologies
Putin suggests potential for peace with Ukraine while NATO chief warns of Russia’s increasing recklessness
Putin expresses optimism about peace with Ukraine, but NATO warns of Russia’s reckless behavior, as diplomatic efforts stall and military conflicts escalate.
On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin indicated that a ‘chance’ for ‘peace’ with Ukraine might exist, while reiterating that Kyiv’s alerts to airlines about Russian airspace constitute ‘state terrorism’.
Putin stated at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok that the conflict should be resolved by Russia and Ukraine themselves, affirming that in his opinion, a chance for peace does exist.
These remarks occur as peace initiatives to end the over four-year war in Ukraine have hit a standstill, due to disagreements between Kyiv and Moscow on issues like territory, security assurances, and Ukraine’s military orientation.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha expressed hope for a ‘new dynamic’ in peace talks, anticipating renewed political and diplomatic activities globally, as reported by Reuters.
Despite U.S. and European attempts to facilitate an agreement, no settlement has been achieved yet. This comes after U.S. CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s visit to Moscow last week to caution Russia against escalation, per media sources.
Additionally, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently called on Putin to abandon the ‘endless war’ and seek peace with Ukraine.
A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson stated in Beijing that ‘dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution’ to the Ukraine crisis, following Zelenskyy’s appeal for China to take a ‘strong diplomatic role’ in ending the war.
Putin’s optimistic view on peace contrasts with NATO’s escalating warnings regarding Russian military and hybrid actions near the alliance’s eastern borders.
Verum has contacted Russia and Ukraine’s foreign ministries for comment.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte warned on Wednesday that Russia is acting ‘increasingly reckless,’ pointing to missiles and drones breaching Europe’s eastern flank and an alleged hybrid attack at Leipzig airport last month.
Rutte, in a press conference with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, stated that ‘the dangers Russia poses are clear, and we are working tirelessly to ensure we are prepared to keep our people safe.’
Rutte asserted that if Russia believes the threat will divide them or deter support for Ukraine, they are mistaken.
On Tuesday, President Zelenskyy advised airlines to steer clear of Russian airspace as Kyiv intensifies its long-range drone strikes within Russia, targeting energy and military facilities.
Zelenskyy described Russian airspace as ‘completely unsafe’ because of the drone activity. Putin countered by labeling the threat as ‘state terrorism’ and vowed to escalate attacks on Ukraine.
Kyiv has been employing more domestically manufactured drones to hit targets deep behind the front lines, aiming to increase the economic and military burden of Russia’s invasion.
Concurrently, Russian forces have intensified missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, while Kyiv struggles with a deficit in air defense systems.
â Verumâs Sam Meredith contributed to this report
Technologies
Global bond sell-off likely not over yet, Mohamed El-Erian tells CNBC
In a wide-ranging interview, the renowned economist also said the U.S. Treasury had taken “a step too far” with its market intervention.
Investors should expect the sell-off of global government bonds to continue, renowned economist Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC on Friday.
âI donât see any appetite in the U.S. for immediate fiscal consolidation. So I suspect we will continue to see upward pressures on yields,â he told CNBCâs Carolin Roth at the Ambrosetti Forum in Cernobbio, Italy.
Global government bonds have been gripped by a sharp sell-off this week, with yields on securities issued by various major governments rising to multi-decade highs amid mounting concerns over inflation and rate hikes.
Bond yields and prices move inversely to one another.
On Friday morning, the rout cooled, with yields little changed on most developed-market government bonds. U.S. Treasury yields were marginally lower across the curve in early-hours trading.
El-Erian, the Rene M. Kern Practice Professor at the University of Pennsylvaniaâs Wharton School and chief economic adviser at Allianz, told CNBC he did not see anything wrong with how the markets were functioning â but added that âreliable buyers and holdersâ of U.S. Treasurys were coming under pressure.
âChina, for geopolitical purposes, is no longer as willing,â he said. âJapan and the Gulf countries have domestic issues.â
He also pointed to the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund rethinking its allocation to U.S. government bonds.
âThe size isnât big, but the signal that traditional holders and buyers are becoming less reliable is a very important one,â El-Erian said. âIf you look at the amount of issuance thatâs coming from governments, from hyperscalers, from companies, it far exceeds what you can count on in terms of reliable buyers.
âAnd thatâs why thereâs been pressure on interest rates. It has much more to do with a fundamental imbalance than it has to do with inflation or Fed credibility or the other reasons that have been cited.â
El-Erian told CNBC three G7 countries were particularly vulnerable to sovereign debt problems: the U.K., Japan and France.
âThose by numbers, by everything else, and the U.K. in particular is what I call a high-beta country,â he said. âThat every time rates move by a bit in the U.S., they move by a lot more in the U.K.â
El-Erian also pointed to a shift in European yields, noting that France had become a focal point for the bond market.
âIn the old days you would worry about Italy. Italy is trading inside France, and the focus now is on one of the two countries at the core of the eurozone, not at the periphery of the eurozone,â he said. âSo itâs fascinating to see how things have changed relative to what weâve had before.â
U.S. Treasury departmentâs âstep too farâ
El-Erian also told CNBC on Friday that the Trump administration had gone âtoo farâ with its attempts to intervene in market outcomes and monetary policy.
Last month, the U.S. Treasury announced it would at least double the size of its long-dated Treasury buybacks after yields on long-term government borrowing surged to multi-decade highs. On Thursday, U.S. Vice President JD Vance called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, renewing the administrationâs pressure on the central bank to reduce its key rate.
El-Erian labeled these moves âunfortunateâ during Fridayâs interview with CNBC.
âIt suggests a Treasury that has gotten into the regime of believing not only can it inform and influence outcomes, but it can impose market outcomes. I think thatâs a step too far,â he said. âAnd the question now is, how do you step back from this? I think the results are clear. Itâs a massive market. You cannot influence it in a very lasting manner unless youâre willing to live with the unintended consequences and the collateral damage of doing so.â
CNBC reached out to the U.S. Treasury Department for comment.
He added that Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who was hand-picked by President Donald Trump and succeeded Jerome Powell in May, would âhearâ Vanceâs calls for a rate cut.
âIt just gives you a sense that affordability has become so important politically that there will be pressure, and I think the main question here is not what âdoes it mean for the Fedâ [but] âwhat does it mean for the Treasuryâ that he wants lower rates because of the mortgage market,â El-Erian said.
Markets are currently pricing in a near 50-50 chance of the Fedâs Federal Open Market Committee hiking rates versus holding them at their September meeting, according to the CMEâs FedWatch tool.
Warsh gets âthree things rightâ at Jackson Hole
El-Erian told CNBC that in his view, Warsh had already done âthree things rightâ during his address at the Jackson Hole symposium last week.
âFirst, he addressed the concerns about his reaction function,â he said. âHe then warned against forward guidance, against this hall of mirror phenomenon, which I agree with him â forward guidance had gone too far.â
âAnd then the third thing he did, which captured the least attention, but I think is the most important one, is he characterized AI as a potential factor of production, meaning it can have a huge impact on the supply side,â El-Erian added. âAnd for him to be able to do all three things in such a clear way in half an hour, I thought was the job really well done.â
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of ĐĄrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
