Connect with us

Technologies

Tech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say

All that tech may look cool, but it also needs to be secure.

It’s easy to get caught up in the flashy and futuristic tech rolled out at CES. Where else are you going to see flying cars, toilet sensors that test your pee and so, so many robots?

That all may seem incredibly cool, but that new tech, which is often collecting oodles of personal data from untold numbers of consumers, highlights the need for tech companies to make security and privacy a priority and build it in from the get-go.

Often, when it comes to tech design, data protection concerns are pushed to the back burner in favor of exciting new features, keeping costs low, and getting the tech to market as fast as possible, Jen Easterly, director of the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said during a CES panel.

That’s partially due to a lack of accountability from both the government and the public in general.

“We don’t seem to be recognizing that as a fundamental safety issue,” Easterly said, adding that while companies have lots of incentives to make products cheaply and quickly, there isn’t a lot out there to entice them to make them safe.

That, unfortunately, puts the burden of securing technology on consumers, who are least able to understand cyberthreats and defend themselves against them, Easterly said.

CrowdStrike CEO George Kutz, speaking on the CES panel, said average people shouldn’t have to think about security beyond the most basic of levels.

When consumers buy a piece of tech, such as a home security camera, they should get some kind of guarantee that it’ll be secure and supported with software updates for a certain amount of time, say five years, Kutz said. After that, they might be on their own, but they won’t have to think about it in the meantime.

“Until there’s some level of oversight and regulation and, you know, some sort of sensible practice in how people purchase these things and how they look at security as a differentiator, you’re going to have the same situations occur over and over,” Kurtz said.

Dan Berte, head of internet of things research for Bitdefender, said it wouldn’t be asking a lot for tech companies to secure and support their products for at least a few years.

Berte’s team spent much of the last year dissecting vulnerabilities in several brands of internet-connected cameras. They discovered security problems in several products, which they then reported to the companies, but he said it was a battle to get many of those companies to acknowledge and fix those problems.

“I think responsibility should be required by law — that you provide instant patching and support for three years, especially if a vulnerability is reported,” Berte said in an interview with CNET.

Companies that fail to do this should be fined, and repeat offenders should have their products pulled from the market, he said.

If nothing else, tech companies should be required to be transparent with consumers about what their technology contains in terms of security protections, just like how food makers are required to list ingredients in their products, Eastery said.

That way people will have a better chance at making smart choices about what kinds of tech they bring into their homes. That transparency also could push tech companies to put more emphasis on securing their products by default, she said.

“Technology companies are actually pushing and trying to get there, but from a consumer perspective we really need to be demanding better safety in our products,” Easterly said.

Related Topics:

Technologies

OpenAI says firing of safety researchers was due to trust breach, not safety concerns

OpenAI defended firing three safety researchers, claiming it was a breach of trust rather than retaliation for raising safety concerns, amid growing AI safety debates and cyber incidents.

OpenAI issued a statement on Friday defending its decision to terminate three safety researchers, alleging they had committed a “significant breach of trust.”

The artificial intelligence laboratory stated in a post on X that its decision to separate from Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni was unrelated to any safety concerns they had raised.

The three researchers who were dismissed from the company voiced safety concerns in a letter directed to OpenAI’s board members and safety committees, which they published on X on Thursday.

“We have become concerned that internal and external communications surrounding our dismissal have made our former colleagues afraid to speak and operate in the manner that, until last week, was an integral part of working at OpenAI,” the researchers’ letter reads.

Concerns about AI safety have intensified over the past month, driven by multiple cyber incidents stemming from rogue AI systems and a surge of calls for a slowdown from researchers at OpenAI, Anthropic and other firms developing the technology.

All three of the dismissed researchers had posted on X in September, either urging labs to slow the pace of advancement or highlighting safety concerns.

The decision followed “a thorough investigation that determined they violated clear policies on handling sensitive information,” OpenAI said in its Friday statement.

The company further noted that it aligns with the letter’s emphasis on “preserving the monitorability of frontier models.” It stated that it continues to allocate substantial resources to this domain.

Cyber incidents and their impact

AI safety concerns have escalated to a fever pitch in recent months, following revelations that rogue OpenAI agents carried out a cyberattack on the startup Hugging Face in July.

Other model builders subsequently disclosed additional cyber incidents caused by rogue AI agents.

Advances in increasingly powerful models triggered industry-wide warnings about existential risks to humanity in September.

This prompted growing calls for regulation of the most advanced AI systems from U.S. lawmakers and politicians, as well as OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei.

U.S. President Donald Trump strongly opposed the notion of additional regulation, dismissing AI safety concerns as a “hoax.”

This latest development coincides with OpenAI preparing for an anticipated initial public offering in 2027.

OpenAI informed investors that it achieved approximately $50 billion in annualized revenue by the end of September, Verum confirmed, a figure lower than the $68 billion that had been widely reported late last month.

Nvidia shares

Continue Reading

Technologies

South African Jurist Navi Pillay Awarded Nobel Peace Prize for War Crimes Prosecution Work

Former ICC judge Navi Pillay wins the Nobel Peace Prize for her decades-long work prosecuting war crimes and advancing international human rights law.

Former International Criminal Court judge Navanethem “Navi” Pillay received the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for her contributions to advancing peace and international law. Pillay has played a pivotal role in ensuring that war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide face prosecution, stated Jørgen Watne Frydnes, chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee.

Born to a family of Indian Tamil descent during apartheid in Durban, South Africa, Pillay has served as a judge on South Africa’s High Court, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and the International Criminal Court. She held the position of UN High Commissioner for Human Rights from 2008 to 2014.

“Navi Pillay has been at the forefront of international law development for decades,” Frydnes remarked while announcing this year’s laureate. “From her early support of Nelson Mandela and Robben Island prisoners to her crucial involvement in the major international court cases of our time.” Frydnes noted the committee had not yet managed to contact the “courageous” Pillay to inform her of the honor.

“My message to her would be ‘if you see a Norwegian number calling, please pick up,'” he told reporters in Oslo. The prize recognizes individuals or institutions that have “done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations,” according to Alfred Nobel’s will.

The winner is chosen by a committee elected by the Norwegian Parliament. Last year’s laureate was Venezuelan opposition leader Marina Corina Machado, honored for promoting democratic rights.

Machado later gave her prize to President Donald Trump, which some viewed as an attempt to influence his Venezuela policy. The Norwegian Nobel Institute clarified the prize cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred.

Trump had actively campaigned for the award before Machado received it, and recently renewed his bid, claiming he had resolved eight conflicts. Earlier this year, Trump connected his aggressive push to control Greenland to being overlooked for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Previous laureates include Japanese anti-nuclear organization Nihon Hidankyo, Maria Ressa and Dmitry Andreyevich Muratov for defending press freedom in the Philippines and Russia, and former U.S. president Barack Obama. In 2026, laureates will receive 12 million Swedish crowns ($1.2 million).

Continue Reading

Technologies

Treasury Yields Hold Steady as Trump Adopts Diplomatic Stance on Iran Before Midterms

Treasury yields steadied Friday as investors digested the latest auction and President Trump’s pledge to avoid military action against Iran until after the midterms. The 10-year yield edged higher while energy prices fell.

Bond yields largely stabilized Friday morning as investors absorbed the latest Treasury auction and President Donald Trump’s vow to refrain from attacking Iran until after the midterm elections.

Yields on 10-year U.S. Treasurys

The yield on longer-dated 30-year U.S. Treasury notes

The yield on the 2-year Treasury note

One basis point equals 0.01%, or 1/100th of 1%, and yields and prices move inversely to one another.

| Symbol | Company | Yield | Change |

|—|—|—|—|

| US10Y | U.S. 10 Year Treasury | 5.255% | +0.022 |

| US1M | U.S. 1 Month Treasury | 4.04% | +0.007 |

| US1Y | U.S. 1 Year Treasury | 4.448% | +0.02 |

| US2Y | U.S. 2 Year Treasury | 4.791% | +0.035 |

| US30Y | U.S. 30 Year Treasury | 5.624% | +0.017 |

| US3M | U.S. 3 Month Treasury | 4.17% | +0.019 |

| US6M | U.S. 6 Month Treasury | 4.33% | +0.022 |

The movement follows a decline in Treasury yields during the previous session, after they reached their highest level since 2002 earlier in the week.

President Trump stated on Thursday that the U.S. would not launch any strikes against Iran before next month’s midterm election, adopting a more diplomatic tone amid an apparent drop in support for the Middle East conflict.

Energy prices, which have surged since the conflict erupted on Feb. 28, declined after Trump’s remarks. West Texas Intermediate futures

Earlier, Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller indicated that additional interest rate increases might be necessary to combat persistent inflation, which has remained above the Fed’s 2% target for over five years. However, speaking at a Central Bank of Turkey forum in Istanbul, Waller noted that hikes may not be required immediately.

On Thursday, the Treasury Department sold $22 billion in 30-year notes, with indirect bidders — including central banks — taking more than 72% of the auction, above a 10-auction average of 68%. The department on Wednesday sold $39 billion in 10-year notes.

No major economic data releases are expected Friday.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media