Technologies
Best Monitor Under $200 You Can Get for 2023
Monitors are necessary for a large number of employees and students to work efficiently, and you don’t need to spend a fortune to get a good one from LG, Samsung, or Dell.
For remote workers, gamers and creatives, a good monitor is a critical piece of your workstation. Even if you usually work on a laptop, adding a second screen to your setup can make a huge difference in your productivity. And fortunately, you don’t have to drop $500 or more to get your hands on a decent display. We’ve rounded up some of the best monitors on the market right now that you can pick up for less than $200 below.
There are a few things to keep in mind: When buying a budget monitor, you should check out the listing to see what’s included. Make sure it’s not missing items that you would have to purchase separately and that would drive the price above that «cheap monitor» threshold, like a stand or cables. The stand might not be an issue if you’re planning to use the VESA mount to put it on a wall or arm. But in that case, you should ensure the mount screws on the back of the monitor match yours: The bulk of these have 100×100-millimeter mounts, but in some cases, they have 200x200mm or 75x75mm mounts — or they don’t support a VESA mount at all.
Got a Mac? If it’s an old MacBook Pro with an HDMI port, or an iMac or Mac Mini, you won’t have a problem. MacBooks with USB-C/Thunderbolt 3 connections will require an adapter or cable with conversion built-in because they won’t have a dedicated display port. You may also need to fiddle with the resolution and scaling settings in Mac OS, since it natively prefers a 16:10 aspect ratio, not the 16:9 aspect ratio that’s much more popular on Windows.
Read more: How to Buy a Monitor for Gaming or Working From Home
Unless you’re a hardcore gamer or creative professional, many of the most technical specs — latency and color gamut, for example — won’t really matter to you (though many of these could serve as a budget gaming monitor). You should always take them with a grain of salt, anyway.
For less than $200, you can generally expect to get:
- A maximum of 1,920×1,080-pixel screen resolution (dubbed by marketers as «Full HD resolution» and also referred to as 1080p or 2K for its roughly 2,000 pixels across). Below 27 inches, that’s fine. At 27 inches or larger, it’s not great except in one important case. Essentially, the reason you buy a 27-inch monitor over a 24-inch is usually because you want to fit more on to it. But if it’s using the same number of pixels, it just makes everything bigger — it doesn’t put more on the screen. And because it’s spreading them across a bigger screen, some people (like me) may get annoyed at seeing the pixel grid. I find a pixel density (the number of pixels per inch, or ppi) of at least 90 a good balance, but YMMV. The exception? If you actually need things like text to be bigger, such as if you have impaired vision.
- A stand that lets you tilt the computer monitor, not raise or lower it. We want to reduce eye strain and optimize ergonomics wherever possible.
- While there might be one or two larger, the monitors go mostly up to 27 inches.
- Between 250 and 350 nits of brightness. That should be fine for most uses.
- Up to 75Hz refresh rate for an IPS (which stands for in-plane switching) monitor or 144Hz refresh rate for a TN (twisted nematic). A high refresh rate matters if you’re planning to play a lot of FPS, racing, fighting or other motion-sensitive gaming. An IPS monitor is better for general-purpose use, since it’s superior for off-angle viewing and typically has better color. But the fastest IPS monitor you’ll find for the money is 75Hz. A TN monitor is better for fast gaming and a better gaming experience; it has a higher contrast ratio, but poorer viewing angle — color accuracy and contrast changes as you move further from looking straight-on.
- If it comes with built-in speakers, don’t assume they’re a replacement for real standalone versions. They’re occasionally better than expected, but think of the speakers as a nice perk for basic system sounds or videoconferencing and consider it a windfall if they’re satisfactory for entertainment. (I’ve been relatively impressed with the speakers in BenQ’s EW series.)
- A lot of these cheap monitors support AMD’s adaptive refresh FreeSync technology, which works with AMD’s graphics processors for syncing game frame rates with the display.
- A curved monitor, which can make a wide display fit into your field of view without requiring you to sit too far back, isn’t worth paying more for in monitors 27 inches or smaller; then the bezels are too far within your field of view. One potential exception is if you plan to span across three identical monitors for gameplay. Then they wrap around you better than three flat screens.
Upping your budget to between $200 and $300 will bring more 32-inch screen size options and 2,560×1,440 resolution. And, of course, the more you’re willing to spend, the more you’re likely to find something in stock and ready to ship.
Read more: Best Speakerphone for Working From Home
Samsung
If you are looking for budget gaming monitors, this budget FHD monitor’s 75Hz refresh gives you a little latitude for gaming and has an IPS panel for better color and viewing angle in the sea of VA competitors; plus, this cheap gaming monitor option is pretty attractive with thin bezels and a stand that’s less clunky-looking than some. You’ll get an HDMI cable in the box, and it has a 100×100 VESA mount. There are some drawbacks, such as some backlight bleed that buyers have noticed, and it has an HDMI 1.4 connection instead of 2.0 (if you care), plus the stand only allows the screen to tilt, not raise or lower.
LG
The LG is a solid, attractive general-purpose choice with some gaming perks. Though I’d hardly call it a gaming monitor, it has features for a good gaming experience, such as AMD FreeSync support, the ability to overdrive the response time, a 1ms motion-blur reduction mode and an optional center crosshair. It’s slightly brighter than most, and there’s a Photo mode that seems to improve the color accuracy. It’s got a VGA connector in addition to the two HDMIs (though that’s not uncommon in this price range) if you’ve got a really old device to connect. The 24-inch is a smaller version of the 27-inch monitor we tested which has since been discontinued (though still available in places at a much higher price).
LG
This looks to be a more recent follow-up to the 27MK600M-B we tested, with a different stand and a DisplayPort connection instead of the second HDMI. Like that one, it’s got some gaming perks, identical to the 24-inch LG I mentioned above.
LG
This big ‘un doesn’t have ultraskinny bezels or a curved screen — it’s four years old — but when you consider its size, a 75Hz refresh rate and USB-C DisplayPort connector (as well as two HDMI 1.4 ports), you get a lot for the money. It often lists for closer to $300, but right now you can snag it for less than $200 at Amazon and Walmart, making it a pretty good value for the features. There’s a slightly more game-oriented model for $200, the 29WP60G-B, with FreeSync support, thinner bezels and a slightly sleeker design, but don’t get FOMO over the «HDR» you’ll see in the name; it has the same color and brightness specs as the cheaper model. LG has simply added decoding hardware that lets it more-or-less intelligently cram real HDR content to the dim, small gamut display, which is never pretty.
Gigabyte
I don’t like curved 27-inch monitors or VA panels much, but in a sea of 75Hz options, the Gigabyte is a refreshing 165Hz. That makes it a lot more suited to gaming than all the 75Hz models. It also has a greater-than-sRGB color gamut, low-power stereo speakers and a USB hub, which you rarely find together in this price class. The lowest price you’ll find on this monitor right now is $230, but we’re keeping it on this list for the moment as we’ve often seen it discounted to $200 or even lower.
More work-from-home and computing recommendations
- 7 Must-Have Ergonomic Upgrades for Your Home Office
- Best Laptop for 2023
- The 7 Best Blue Light Blocking Glasses to Prevent Eye Fatigue
- Best VPNs for 2023
- 3 Great VPNs for Xbox in 2023
- Best Standing Desk Converters for 2023
- Best Chromebook Deals: Save $200 on Acer Spin 514 and Samsung Galaxy 2 and More
- Want to Learn Python? We Found 5 Online Coding Courses for Beginners
- The Best Monitors According to the CNET Staff Who Use Them
Technologies
Casely Is Recalling Wireless Power Pods Over Fire and Burn Risks, Again
The Consumer Product Safety Board warns that lithium-ion batteries in the recalled power banks can overheat, posing fire and burn hazards.
Casely, a company that makes phone cases and other mobile accessories, is again recalling its 5,000-mAh MagSafe Power Pods with the model number E33A, a year after an initial recall. The Power Pods, sold between March 2022 and September 2024, pose a serious risk of fire and burns and resulted in the death of a 75-year-old woman in 2024.
The US Consumer Product Safety Commission said that since the initial recall in April 2025, an additional 28 incidents of overheating and fires have been reported, including one on a plane. Overall, it’s estimated that as many as 429,200 of these Power Pods, manufactured in China, are potentially affected.
The Power Pods contain lithium-ion batteries, which can overheat and combust. Other companies, such as Anker, have had similar recalls in the last few years over portable battery products.
Following numerous incidents of power banks and portable chargers overheating, Southwest Airlines has changed its policies and will implement restrictions on April 20. The airline is allowing customers to carry only one portable battery pack per flight and restricting where the pack can be stored and how it can be charged during the flight.
Casely and the CPSC are asking those who still own the Power Pods to stop using them immediately and submit a claim for a free replacement at Casely’s website.
The science of why this keeps happening
Lithium-ion batteries, the kind used in the Casely power pods, are the most commonly used rechargeable battery type. They’re used in phones, EVs, electric bikes and scooters, smartwatches, laptops, portable speakers, even toys and vaping devices. They became popular because they’re cheap, energy-dense and have a fairly long lifecycle.
However, they can go wrong when they overheat and combust, and that can be caused by a number of factors. If they short-circuit, that can generate high temperatures and, when coupled with high pressure in some types of cells or devices, can even trigger an explosion.
Some of those precipitating factors include problems at the manufacturing stage, such as inconsistencies or imperfections in the cells’ construction, especially if components are faulty or not reinforced.
Burcu Gurkan, a professor of chemistry at Case Western Reserve University’s Case School of Engineering, said that lithium-ion batteries have «several layers of complications» that can lead to problems.
When, say, components in a lithium-ion cell come into contact because the separators are too thin or damaged, it can cause a short circuit and lead to overheating. The overheating can lead to combustion.
«These batteries have flammable organic components such as carbonate electrolytes, and they can catch on fire in the presence of high temperatures,» Gurkan said.
Solutions to overheating lithium-ion batteries
One way to avoid the danger of fiery batteries is to avoid products that have been recalled. You should also keep an eye on battery-powered devices when they’re in potentially unsafe environments, such as airplanes or extreme climates. But some are hoping improved materials or entirely different types of batteries will help mitigate risks in the future.
Gurkan’s research aims to eliminate hazardous materials from these and other types of batteries. Two of her research projects «have the common goal of developing alternative electrolytes that are not flammable.»
The battery industry is interested in developing better predictive and diagnostic tools to prevent fires and explosions, Gurkan said.
Technologies
Could Your Next Phone Be a Foldable? New Tech and a Possible Apple Model Makes It More Likely
Commentary: Foldable phones are no longer niche designs as the technology has finally advanced to workable mainstream models.
If it seems like every company is now hawking a foldable phone, you’re not wrong. After years of technology experiments and lots of engineering refinements, the big phone designers are going mainstream with models that have ironed out many early problems like visible screen creases. And that’s all before Apple jumps into the market with the rumored iPhone Ultra.
Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 7, for instance, is thin enough to feel like a standard slab phone while folded. The new Honor Magic V6 has a larger battery capacity than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra. Huawei’s Mate X7 has a 50-megapixel main camera with a 10-stop variable aperture — a feature previously limited to top-of-the-line camera phones. And Oppo finally fixed the crease issue with its Find N6 foldable phone, making an almost flat inner screen in the process. These are all quality-of-life upgrades that led me to shift from my iPhone 17 Pro Max full-time. I love the foldable phones for their productivity-focused use, and they no longer hold back on design, battery life or (to an extent) cameras.
These improvements appear to be reflected in sales numbers. The global foldable phone shipments were expected to grow 10% in 2025 compared with 2024, according to a December report from market research firm IDC. This number is expected to continue growing in 2026, with an expected 30% year-on-year jump.
This uptake shows that the foldable category is ready for wider audiences, and these features that we’re seeing right now are the reasons why they are ready to shine.
Creaseless folding screens are now a reality
For the longest time, foldable phones have had a deep bump (crease) running through the middle of their inner screens. While Chinese phone manufacturers minimized it with a water-drop hinge design, the crease has been very much present. That’s why seeing the creaseless concept screen from Samsung Display at CES 2026 was one of my highlights of the tradeshow.
However, the mobile vertical, Samsung Mobile, has yet to use it on a consumer product. While the Korean company surprised me with its thin and light Galaxy Z Fold 7, its crease wasn’t impressively less. In fact, it has only deepened with use over time. I put it next to the new Oppo Find N6, and the difference was night and day.
The Find N6 has set a new standard for book-style foldables. Oppo used 3D-printed liquid photopolymer droplets in the gap between the hinge and the inner screen. These droplets filled the imperfections inherent to each hinge mechanism in a bid to reduce the height variance from the industry standard of 0.2mm to just 0.05mm, as per the company.
This resulted in an almost crease-free folding screen. You can’t feel it unless you rub your nail (slightly) firmly in the middle of the display. The crease is still there, but Oppo has gotten pretty darn close to getting a fully flat canvas.
The Oppo Find N6 is claimed to be 338% more deformation-resistant than before, which should, theoretically, prevent the crease from deepening over time. It is one of those features that will push other phone manufacturers to do better and hopefully, give us more foldable phones with minimal creases.
Antireflective screens for the win
As someone who is outdoors most of the time, I’ve been a big fan of Samsung’s antireflective screens, starting with the Galaxy S24 Ultra. It had a slightly dimmer display, but that issue was solved with the Galaxy S25 Ultra last year. I like antireflective coatings because they make the screens more legible in harsh lighting conditions — whether outdoors or in direct light inside public spaces. And this feature is now slowly coming to foldable phones. It’s a crucial upgrade because, unlike slab phones, you can’t add third-party matte screen protectors on folding screens.
Honor introduced an antireflective matte cover screen on the Magic V5 and improved it with the Magic V6 this year. On the other hand, Oppo added this coating to its inner screen with the Find N5 and upgraded its latest iteration. As a result, these phones are easier to use outdoors, especially when you’re navigating maps or reading on your commute.
It makes more sense to have an anti-reflective coating on the inner screen because most of those folding displays attract smudges very easily (due to their glossy plastic properties). I have to wipe my Fold 7 every time I unfold it on the commute. I like having an expansive canvas to read, but smudges combined with high reflectivity result in a poor viewing experience. I have to wipe the Oppo Find N6 too, but it offers better legibility even on a smudged panel.
Ideally, I’d love to have an antireflective coating on both the cover screen and the inner display, but we’ve yet to see a foldable phone of that kind. However, we’re getting closer with each generation.
Larger batteries in slimmer designs
Battery life is arguably the most important feature in any mobile device. I wouldn’t want to have all the bells and whistles only for my phone to die in the middle of the day. This is corroborated by the readers who voted in a CNET/YouGov survey. They ranked «longer battery life» second only to price among reasons to upgrade to a new phone.
Having a larger cell in a phone matters to most people, and it is made possible by silicon-carbon batteries. It is a relatively new type of power source that’s denser than lithium-ion batteries. As a result, phone manufacturers can fit more battery capacity in the same body. This is how the OnePlus 15 has a 7,300-mAh cell, and the Realme P4 Power packs a 10,001-mAh battery without weighing more than the iPhone 17 Pro Max.
While Apple, Samsung and Google have refrained from adopting silicon-carbon anode batteries, the tech is already maturing elsewhere. Honor was one of the first phone manufacturers to adopt it with the Magic 5 Pro in 2023 and is already on the fifth generation with its new Magic V6.
A silicon-carbon battery becomes more important on foldable phones because they have space constraints and require more display power for their larger screens. The new-gen batteries are slimmer than traditional ones and allow for more cell capacity inside a foldable’s slim body.
Samsung has yet to use it in a device, which is why the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is stuck with a 4,400-mAh battery. Meanwhile, the Honor Magic V6, Oppo Find N6 and Huawei Mate X7 have much bigger 6,600-mAh, 6,000-mAh and 5,600-mAh cells, respectively.
I hope both the upcoming Apple iPhone Fold and Galaxy Z Fold 8 adopt this type of battery so we get all-day power on foldable phones in the US.
Close to flagship cameras
Cameras have been one of the most problematic compromises on foldable phones. They are right up there with noticeable creases and smaller batteries. After all, nobody would like to get an inferior set of cameras on a phone that costs considerably more than traditional flagship phones. But that’s changed in the last few months.
In December, Huawei launched the Mate X7 with a 50-megapixel main camera with a 10-stop variable aperture ranging from f/1.5 to f/4.0. This allows it to take in 86% more light than before and perform better in low light, according to the company. On the other hand, both Oppo and Samsung have high-resolution 200-megapixel main cameras on their latest folding phones.
Honor, Oppo, Vivo and Huawei foldables also have capable telephoto cameras for improved zoom. These are combined with exceptional processing (in some cases) for pleasing-looking portraits. While there’s room for improvement, these cameras are on par with the Galaxy S26 Ultra and Pixel 10 Pro. And they’re no longer the weak point they used to be on foldable phones.
True multitasking that takes advantage of the big screen
When OnePlus Open debuted in 2023, it was hailed for its Open Canvas multitasking feature. The foldable allows you to use up to three apps simultaneously without needing a pop-up window. I used it to research in two browsers side by side and add notes in a Google Docs file at the bottom. I loved the experience, especially when compared to Samsung’s multitasking.
Vivo upped the game last year with its Stage Manager-like Atomic Workbench on the X Fold 5. It added pinned windows to the side of the screen, so I could have one app for focused use with another just a tap away for quick reference. It was a refreshing experience to get that level of multitasking on a mobile device without needing an external accessory for support.
Multitasking on Android should only get better with Android 17, as Google has made it mandatory for apps to properly support resizing and windowed multitasking on the new version. Existing foldable phones like the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Pixel 10 Pro Fold should benefit significantly from this improvement.
In the Apple land, the upcoming iPhone Fold will support iPad-like multitasking, according to a report from Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman. You should expect a side-by-side app layout for true multitasking, which has been notably absent from iOS despite being supported by Android phones for years. The Cupertino-based company is reportedly also updating its core apps with a sidebar on the left side of the screen to take advantage of the larger screen.
More durable foldable phone designs
While many of the aforementioned features are shared by multiple foldable phones, only one device — the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold — is rated for true dust resistance.
An IP rating might be an afterthought when purchasing a new mobile phone, but it becomes more important on a folding phone than on a slab phone. That’s because small dust particles like pocket lint can penetrate foldables through their moving parts, especially around the hinge corners.
Most of these phones (Oppo, Honor and Vivo, among others) are now IP58 or IP59 rated for resistance against harmful dust particles, water submersion and high-pressure water jets, whereas the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 is still stuck at IP48. The «4» means it is protected against solid objects larger than 1mm, but pocket lint and dust are smaller than 1mm. So, these tiny particles can enter the phone and potentially harm the internals.
On the other hand, the «5» in IP58 or IP59 stands for a dust-resistant design and not a dust-tight build. This means it is protected against tiny solid particles (less than 1mm), but they can still enter the phone. That’s why Google’s IP68 rating on the Pixel 10 Pro Fold was a game changer last year. It made a foldable phone with moving parts that’s truly dust-tight, at least according to IEC’s rating guide. This is a major win for durability, and I hope we see more companies work on their phones to make dust-tight designs.
In 2026, we could get multiple different-looking foldable phones. Some might be taller, while others could be wider.
I’m stoked because, for the first time in modern folding phones’ existence, it feels like they have a chance to compete with the best phones in the market. The hardware, software and technology required for it to function flawlessly are finally coming together. These improvements should give us foldable phones that don’t compromise on anything (albeit the price, I don’t expect them to get cheaper anytime soon).
Editors’ note: The author’s travel costs related to the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S26, Huawei Mate X7 and Honor Magic V6 were covered by those corresponding companies. The judgments and opinions of CNET are our own.
Technologies
The Messenger Reinvented: How Verum Is Expanding the Boundaries of Digital Communication
The Messenger Reinvented: How Verum Is Expanding the Boundaries of Digital Communication
For more than a decade, the global messaging landscape has been defined by a handful of dominant platforms. Despite incremental updates, the core experience has remained largely unchanged: text, media sharing, and voice or video calls layered on centralized infrastructure.
Yet a new category of messaging platforms is beginning to emerge — one that treats communication not as a standalone function, but as part of a broader digital ecosystem.
Verum Messenger is one of the more ambitious entrants in this space. Rather than competing solely on interface or speed, it is positioning itself as an integrated environment that combines communication, privacy infrastructure, connectivity, and financial tools within a single application.
Beyond Messaging: Feature Density as Strategy
At the surface level, Verum includes many of the features now expected in modern messaging platforms, such as an AI assistant embedded directly within conversations, scheduled message delivery, disappearing messages after being read, and the ability to edit sent messages.
But it extends further into behavioral transparency and control. Users can receive notifications when someone takes a screenshot, copies, or forwards their messages, while also having the ability to block screenshots entirely and prevent screen recording. These controls are complemented by granular privacy settings, pinned messages, smart notification prioritization, message reactions and quick replies, customizable chat interfaces, and advanced notification controls.
Privacy as Infrastructure, Not Feature
Where Verum attempts to differentiate more aggressively is in its security architecture. The platform incorporates end-to-end encryption across all communications, including encrypted voice and video calls, along with automatic message deletion timers.
Account-level control is also emphasized through one-tap account deletion, restricted chat access, and active session management. Personal data protection is reinforced by storing security keys exclusively on the user’s device and implementing a multi-layered security model.
Additional safeguards include advanced privacy configuration, biometric authentication such as Face ID or Touch ID, passcode-based app locking, protection against unauthorized access, and dedicated private communication modes.
A Built-In Digital Layer
One of the platform’s more distinctive elements is its attempt to consolidate multiple digital services into a single environment.
This includes an integrated VPN, disposable anonymous email addresses, and built-in eSIM functionality, enabling connectivity across more than 150 countries. The application is designed to unify multiple services while supporting international communication, large file transfers, and group chats of up to 10,000 participants.
These are complemented by broader communication tools and an overarching goal of functioning as a centralized hub for managing digital interactions.
Financial Integration Without Fragmentation
In parallel, Verum incorporates a set of financial utilities that aim to reduce reliance on external applications. These include peer-to-peer transfers in fiat currencies, in-app balance top-ups, and a virtual payment card.
Support for Apple Pay and similar services is intended to streamline transactions, while built-in financial management tools suggest a move toward embedding everyday financial activity directly within the messaging layer.
Toward Network Independence
Perhaps the most forward-looking aspect of the platform lies in its recent technical developments.
Verum has introduced messaging capabilities that function without a traditional internet connection, relying instead on direct peer-to-peer communication between devices. This architecture reduces dependence on centralized servers, aligning with a broader industry trend toward decentralization and resilience.
At the same time, the platform incorporates on-device message translation, supporting dozens of languages with local processing. By avoiding cloud-based translation, this approach attempts to preserve user privacy while enabling cross-language communication.
A Broader Industry Signal
Whether Verum itself achieves mainstream adoption remains an open question. Network effects continue to favor established players, and feature breadth alone does not guarantee user migration.
However, the platform illustrates a broader shift in how messaging applications are being conceptualized. Increasingly, they are evolving into multi-functional environments that combine communication, privacy infrastructure, connectivity, and financial interaction.
In that context, Verum is less a direct competitor to existing messengers and more an early example of what a fully integrated digital platform might look like — one where messaging is no longer the product, but the foundation.
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
-
Technologies4 года agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days





