Connect with us

Technologies

Marathon vs. ARC Raiders: Which Extraction Shooter Is Right for You?

The hottest extraction shooter of last year goes up against Bungie’s newest FPS game. Which one comes out on top?

Developer Bungie’s new first-person shooter, Marathon, is a game where players drop onto an alien planet to fight a tyrannical intergalactic government’s robots, ambush fellow humans, and escape with sweet, sweet loot… or die trying.

Even if you’re unfamiliar with the wide world of extraction shooters — games where players need to get in and out of lucrative player-versus-player zones with entire inventories of loot at risk — that gameplay loop probably sounds familiar. Developer Embark Studios’ ARC Raiders, which took the gaming world by storm in October last year, also pits players against killer robots (and each other) as they try to grab any valuables that aren’t nailed down.

Frankly, I don’t think ARC Raiders and Marathon are all that similar, so it’s worth snuffing out the concern that there’s only room for one of the two in your game library. The broad strokes are the same — both games place players in the role of scavengers who will do whatever it takes to survive under positively catastrophic conditions. Both games feature lore-rich worlds colored by striking and distinct art directions. And in ARC Raiders and Marathon alike, death means losing all the weapons, medical supplies and tchotchkes you’re carrying. There are no do-overs.

In my eyes, though, that’s where the similarities between these recent releases end. ARC Raiders and Marathon are wholly separate beasts in their mechanics — even the difference in camera perspective makes a massive difference in how these games are played, with the former’s third-person angle helping players peek around corners while the latter’s first-person view increases immersion.

Moreover, live-service, multiplayer-only, player-versus-player games are shaped by their communities just as much as by their developers. ARC Raiders’ community largely fosters cautious collaboration throughout the game’s postapocalyptic Italian wasteland, while many Marathon players would stab each other in the back for a glimpse of bottom-tier loot in its neon-plastered alien landscapes.

At the end of the day, it doesn’t feel like ARC Raiders and Marathon are truly in competition with each other. The run-to-run gameplay, the combat speed and the “general vibe” of each experience are nothing alike. Which is a good thing.

Yet comparisons between these two games were inevitable: People have been champing at the bit to spin up narratives that pit these juggernauts against one another before Marathon even hit the shelves, and the headlines just keep coming. I understand the compulsion, too: A beleaguered Bungie just released its Hail Mary in the fairly niche extraction-shooter genre that is currently dominated by another game. It’s a baffling play from a studio that, from the outside, feels like it’s on the verge of becoming one of the next victims of the curse suffered by studios acquired by PlayStation.

Against all odds, though, Marathon turned out to be a pretty exceptional game. So let’s turn this perverse exercise on its head. While I think ARC Raiders and Marathon are both high-quality games, one of the two will certainly be better for you, specifically. I’m going to help you determine if you should be spending your time warring against the robotic menace (and occasional humans) here on Earth or far beyond the stars.

ARC Raiders is a game for social survivors

I knew ARC Raiders was going to be something special before it was released. Even in a sanitized games media environment without servers full of players, exploring the ruins of retrofuturist robot-infested Italian towns and countrysides immediately differentiated ARC Raiders from its competitors. Extraction shooters like Escape From Tarkov are mostly dark and dreary FPS games, and ARC Raiders feels like a breath of fresh air by contrast.

As a third-person shooter, ARC Raiders plays much slower than others in the genre. Players can peek around corners, identify threats and set traps — and they’re encouraged to do so, since the makeshift weapons that you carry around are huge, sometimes unwieldy to fire and always cumbersome to reload. The world is threatening if you’re not prepared, because it’s not easy to escape if you’ve been routed by a sneaky ARC bot or an opportunistic player.

What truly endears me to ARC Raiders is its community. The player base, at least in my experience, is mostly composed of friendly folks who just want to lend each other a hand as they scavenge the world above Speranza, but there’s still the underlying tension that chaos could break out at a moment’s notice. ARC Raiders is unique in the extraction shooter space as the one game where more people are willing to negotiate and work together than shoot you on sight, and that helps each run feel storied and distinct.

I’ve gotten to play as heroes, villains and every role in between. I’ve joined posses to hunt down antagonists sniping at a group of innocent looters, been handed loot by mysterious strangers, and backstabbed players who are celebrating a victory over a large ARC robot. I don’t feel like I’ve ever partaken in such a wealth of different interpersonal narratives in any other extraction shooter.

There are still issues with ARC Raiders that persist months after its release. While massive content packages have shipped new maps, enemies and loot, the game’s balancing still leaves something to be desired. I don’t like that the free loadout weapons are still among the best in the game (even after several rounds of game-changing updates) while more complex gadgets like ARC-seeking grenades have become even harder to craft.

ARC Raiders’ greatest flaw is that its endgame doesn’t always feel as compelling as the tooth-and-nail fight to get there. Hulking robotic enemies like the Matriarch are cinematic raid bosses, but after you take these titans down, the game starts to lose its purpose — the only things you score from this behemoth’s corpse are materials to craft guns that efficiently destroy more ARC. But you’ve already summited that mountain by beating the game’s hardest challenge, so what’s the point? If you aren’t choosing to wipe your character progress every season, ARC Raiders grows stale — while Marathon has a promising future if Bungie integrates Destiny-like raid mechanics into its endgame.

Marathon is a free-for-all sci-fi sweatfest

You have to be a little bit of a freak to enjoy Bungie’s latest first-person shooter. The tagline for the game is “death is the first step,” so it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the surface of Tau Ceti IV (the distant planet where Marathon takes place) is rife with dangerous flora, fauna and killer robots that are absolutely brutal to take on.

Even if you master this strange new world, other players will happily stab you in the back. Popping your head around a corner and trying to make conversation with another player might be a good way to make friends in ARC Raiders, but trying the same thing in Marathon will often get your head popped.

If anything, Marathon nurtures the “every man for himself” mentality, since it’s exceptionally easy to take down other players. While ARC Raiders favors slow, drawn-out engagements with makeshift weapons and shrapnel grenades where methodical approaches can decide firefights, Marathon has a very fast “time-to-kill,” making it easy for players to knock each other out in seconds. If you’re not shooting first and asking questions later, you’re losing a precious advantage you have over an opponent.

Each moment is fraught with danger, and Marathon’s world feels truly oppressive in a way that ARC Raiders doesn’t. The sound design is fantastic — the ambience of the otherworldly environment and dead industrial outposts contrasts with the thudding footfalls of nearby enemies to great effect, fueling my fear and spiking my adrenaline as I prepare to fight until my last breath. ARC Raiders only produces this thrill level in the endgame during raids against gargantuan robots; in Marathon, that satisfying mix of cortisol and dopamine is being drip-fed to you every single match.

Marathon regularly borrows elements from other extraction shooters, at the risk of sometimes feeling like a game I’ve played before. But Bungie’s latest game takes these building blocks — the unforgivingly quick time-to-kill in PvP gunfights, an in-depth contract and faction reputation system and a wonderfully complex set of perk trees — and polishes them to fit Marathon’s cold, corporate, cyberpunky world.

More impressively, the small twists on the familiar extraction shooter formula (especially light hero-shooter elements of the classes) feel extremely impactful, completely changing the way I create loadouts and instigate fights during my runs. Marathon feels like an “all killer, no filler” version of what most of the genre’s games are trying to do — it’s not groundbreaking, but it might be the best “classic” extraction shooter on the market right now.

Which extraction shooter is worth your time?

Despite my effusive praise, you may be surprised to read that I actually don’t much enjoy Marathon. I appreciate that the genre’s core gameplay loop is enhanced by Bungie’s trademark satisfying gunplay, as well as a ton of meta-progression bonuses, which I’m a total sucker for. And while I’m sure the corporate neon-drenched brutalism of Marathon’s graphic realism art style is revolting to some folks, I think the game is gorgeous.

Still, there’s just something about playing Marathon that feels empty to me compared to ARC Raiders. Every human interaction in ARC Raiders is a real toss-up between friendship and firefight. During some runs, I’ll make allies and share loot, and in other matches, I’ll strike up an uneasy alliance with a shifty player to extract together. Getting double-crossed is part of the game, but it isn’t guaranteed. I’ve fallen in love with ARC Raiders because of its community.

ARC Raiders clicks for me where Marathon just doesn’t, and that’s OK. Just because these games are big-budget productions that are ostensibly positioned as competitors doesn’t mean they’re actually built for the same audience. Bungie and Embark Studios both made exceptional extraction shooters.

If you enjoy emergent narratives and novel interactions with strangers (or you can’t keep up with twitchy, fast-paced shooters), ARC Raiders will be your go-to game. If you enjoy moving fast (and dying faster), have an affinity for Bungie’s signature brand of gunplay, or you feel at home playing Destiny or Apex Legends, then Marathon will be your new favorite game.

I truly believe neither of these games is better than the other — they’re just different, and it’s up to you to recognize what experiences you generally enjoy and choose accordingly. And hey, at the end of the day, it’s always worth remembering that nobody will stop you from enjoying them both.

Technologies

Trump Maintains US‑Iran Negotiations Continue Amid Tehran’s Denials of Duplicity

President Trump insists that US‑Iran talks are ongoing despite Tehran’s denial of any negotiation plans, while warning that only a deal or total surrender will allow passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Conflicting statements from both sides have heightened uncertainty as the conflict enters its sixth month.

On Monday, President Donald Trump asserted that negotiations between the United States and Iran are still taking place, even after Tehran stated it has no intention of engaging in direct talks with Washington.

In a fiery Truth Social post, Trump labeled Iran’s leaders “unbelievably duplicitous,” claiming they are lying about ongoing peace talks “whether Iran wants to admit it or not.” He repeated his assertion that the United States completely controls the Strait of Hormuz, despite maritime traffic through the crucial route lingering at only a small fraction of pre‑conflict levels.

He wrote, “Nothing reaches Iran unless we allow it, and nothing will pass unless a deal—or total surrender—is achieved.”

Earlier that day, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told reporters there is no imminent plan for U.S.–Iran negotiations, contradicting Trump’s earlier comment that talks would resume Monday afternoon. Baghaei added that Iran’s only current discussions are with Oman concerning the Strait of Hormuz.

The conflicting statements have heightened uncertainty over the peace‑talk process and the broader conflict, now in its sixth month.

Trump’s assertion about new negotiations came a day after he said on Truth Social that he had agreed to cancel a massive strike against Iran “subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL.” He said in the same post that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries had asked him to hold off on that attack because “the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”

Trump has claimed dozens of times throughout the more‑than‑five‑month‑long war that a deal is at hand. No permanent deal has been signed, and a temporary ceasefire reached in June has fallen apart.

Trump has also repeatedly threatened to launch devastating strikes against Iran before backing off. After the latest example, oil prices on Monday fell and stocks surged.

BMI, a research unit of Fitch Solutions, said in a note Monday that a broader diplomatic understanding on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is still achievable this quarter, while raising the probability of its escalation scenario to 35% from 25%, citing mounting military, diplomatic and economic signs of rising U.S.-Iran tensions.

“Diplomatic progress is likely to be punctuated by periodic military flare-ups, while miscalculation by either side could trigger a renewed escalation,” BMI analysts wrote in a note. The firm said the key issue to watch is the future governance of the strait, as the Iran-Oman talks — potentially backed by Gulf states, China and the U.S. — point to efforts to build a post-conflict shipping framework.

Shipping risks persist even as diplomacy appears to be advancing. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Centre said it received a report of an incident 20 nautical miles (23 miles) northeast of Khasab, Oman — at the mouth of the strait — with a tanker’s master reporting an explosion in close proximity to the vessel at about 20:37 UTC Sunday (4:37 pm ET). The vessel and crew were safe and authorities are investigating, UKMTO said, advising ships to transit with caution.

The proposal Trump announced over the weekend calls for the U.S. and Iran to return to negotiations and continue ironing out some of the thorny issues that had derailed diplomatic efforts, according to The Associated Press, citing a regional official involved in the mediation efforts.

The official said the proposal also includes a reopening of the Hormuz Strait and halting attacks across the region, including by Iranian-backed militias in Iraq on the Arab Gulf countries and Jordan.

The U.S., for its part, will end its naval blockade on Iran and allow Tehran to export its oil, the official said, adding that no deal has been reached, although the mediation efforts remained underway.

Trump’s weekend reversal has lowered the temperature after days of escalating attacks across the Gulf. Kuwait said Saturday that Iranian forces launched a wave of drones within its airspace, with its military destroying multiple aircraft after Iran targeted critical infrastructure in the country’s north.

A parallel track with Muscat is also advancing. Iranian diplomats said Tehran was close to reaching a new arrangement with Oman to manage shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a deal critical to preventing the war from escalating further, according to the Financial Times.

Iranian officials said negotiations over future management of the Hormuz Strait with Oman, which sits on the opposite shore of the waterway, are in their final stages. The agreed shipping route would be different from those used before, according to Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Baghaei, adding that the new route was separate from the issue of the strait’s reopening or continued closure.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Oil Prices Slide as Trump Halts Planned Iran Strike

Oil prices dropped after Trump cancelled a planned strike on Iran, with WTI down about 5% and Brent near 5% lower. He said the move followed requests from Tehran and regional allies for a pause while a deal shaping the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program is negotiated.

Oil prices fell on Monday after President Donald Trump announced he had cancelled a planned strike on Iran. WTI futures dropped roughly 5% to $80.34 a barrel, while Brent slipped about 4.7% to $83.77 a barrel.

Trump said early Sunday he called off the strike after Iran and several Middle Eastern nations asked him to hold off, noting that the outlines of a deal had been agreed upon. He added that the prospective accord would entail the immediate, full opening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to Iran’s nuclear ambitions, according to his Truth Social post.

The president had been considering another round of strikes as diplomatic hopes waned since the conflict began on February 28. He said the U.S. and Iran would meet for talks on Monday, but Iran denied any scheduled negotiations with Washington, citing PressTV. Iran’s foreign‑ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei clarified that Tehran was only discussing shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz with Oman. In a follow‑up Truth Social message, Trump insisted that, regardless of Iran’s acknowledgment, the United States is indeed discussing a solution to a long‑standing problem created by Iran.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Oil Prices Drop as Trump Cancels Planned Attack on Iran

Oil prices fell sharply after President Trump announced the cancellation of a planned strike on Iran, citing a new deal that would open the Hormuz Strait and end Iran’s nuclear threat.

Oil prices fell sharply on Monday after President Donald Trump announced that he had called off a planned strike on Iran.

West Texas Intermediate futures, the U.S. benchmark, slipped roughly 5% to close at $80.34 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international benchmark, declined 4.7% to settle at $83.77 a barrel.

Trump made the announcement early Sunday, saying he had canceled the strike following requests from Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries.

In a Truth Social post, he wrote: “We have just been asked by Iran, and other Middle Eastern Countries, to hold off any attack in that the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”

The president indicated that the proposed agreement would include the immediate, complete, and total opening of the Hormuz Strait, as well as an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.

Trump had been weighing additional strikes amid diminishing prospects for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict that began on Feb. 28. He stated that the U.S. and Iran would hold negotiations on Monday.

Tehran denied that talks were planned with Washington, according to state news outlet PressTV.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran was only holding talks with Oman regarding the routes ships can use through the Strait of Hormuz.

In a subsequent Truth Social post, Trump added that whether “Iran wants to admit it or not, we are, in fact, talking of a solution to a problem that they have caused for decades.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media