Technologies
Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro: Are They Still Worth Buying With Buds 4 Pro’s Release?
Samsung’s flagship audio line upgraded with the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. I’m revisiting the Buds 3 Pro to see if their lower price makes them a smarter buy than the latest model.
Pros
- Lightweight and comfortable
- Very good sound quality
- Decent noise canceling
- Excellent voice-calling performance
- Lights in buds are kind of cool
- Built-in voice controls (no wake word required)
Cons
- Newer Galaxy Buds 4 Pro aren’t a huge upgrade, but they are better
- Design looks a tad generic
- Noise canceling could be slightly better
Are the Galaxy Buds Pro 3 still worth it in 2026?
Samsung has released the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro ($250), which have an arguably sleeker design, a slightly better fit and improved sound quality and noise canceling. However, their feature sets are essentially the same, and the Buds 3 Pro have LED lights in their stems while the Buds 4 Pro don’t.
The upgrades to the Buds 4 Pro’s sound and noise canceling aren’t huge, but they are noticeable, particularly in sound quality. Like the Buds 3 Pro, the Buds 4 Pro are equipped with dual drivers, including a separate 11-millimeter woofer and a 5.5mm planar tweeter. Samsung says both drivers have been upgraded and highlighted the woofer as “super wide,” with improved bass performance, even though it’s the same size as the Buds 3 Pro’s woofer (11mm).
My full review of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro offers an in-depth evaluation. Spoiler: They won a CNET Editors’ Choice award and currently sit near the top of our best wireless earbuds list. Additionally, I reviewed 2025’s Galaxy Buds 3 FE, which also received a CNET Editors’ Choice award and are a decent value at around $130 online.Â
I generally steer folks toward the newer Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, especially if Samsung is running a deal on them with a trade-in or purchase of a new Galaxy phone.Â
But you can find the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, particularly the international version (no warranty for US buyers), nicely marked down to around $140 online. If you just can’t quite afford the Buds 4 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro are worth considering if they’re well discounted.Â
Read more: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs. Sony WF-1000XM6: Top Android Earbuds Compared Â
Editor’s note, March 11, 2026: What follows is my original review from July 24, 2024.
Samsung’s Galaxy Buds 3 and Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are the company’s first earbuds to feature stems in their designs, and some folks are mocking Samsung for creating another Apple AirPods clone in a sea of AirPods clones. There’s some truth to that, but ultimately, what matters is how well these earbuds fit, sound and perform. They get high marks in those departments, though I did have a few small gripes.
The two buds are similar in many ways — they share a lot of the same features — but also have some key differences. The Galaxy Buds 3 ($180) are open buds like the AirPods 3 and are designed for people who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears. The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro ($250), on the other hand, are noise-isolating earbuds like the AirPods Pro 2.
Read more: Best wireless earbuds of 2024
Both are available in silver or white, and their prices are very similar to those of corresponding AirPods models, which puts them in premium earbuds territory. They also have similar battery life ratings to the AirPods. The Buds 3 have up to 6 hours of battery life with noise canceling off and 5 hours with it on, while the Buds 3 Pro last up to 6 hours with ANC off and 5 hours with it on.
Both sets are equipped with Bluetooth 5.4, are IP57 water- and dust-resistant and support LE audio along with the new Auracast feature (Samsung’s 360 audio feature is also on board). An IP57 rating means the buds aren’t fully waterproof, but they can withstand a sustained spray of water.
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro design
All earbuds with stems look pretty similar, so it’s easy to complain that the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro’s design looks a little generic and is short on wow factor. Some have said they’re a little cheap-looking, and that may be true, but the case feels solid, and the buds themselves don’t look any cheaper than the AirPods.
Samsung has tried to distinguish its stems — it calls them blades — from the AirPods’ rounded pipes by giving them an angular design with a bit of a Tesla Cybertruck vibe, especially in the silver ones.Â
From what Samsung has told me, it simply found, through testing, that the blade design worked best for most people. A lot of folks had fit issues with Galaxy Buds Live and the Galaxy Buds Pro 2 (I had to use my own larger eartips with them), and from my wear tests, the new design will be a better fit for more people. I found them lightweight and comfortable to wear, and so did fellow CNET editor Lisa Eadicicco, who reviewed Samsung’s latest foldable phones, the Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6.Â
Getting a tight seal is crucial for optimal sound quality and noise-canceling performance. The Galaxy Wear app tests seal quality, and I passed with the largest eartips, though a slightly larger option would’ve been nice, especially since the eartips are custom-designed for the buds, making it tricky to find other tips that work. The same is true for the AirPods Pro 2. Ironically, I was able to get third-party foam tips made for the AirPods Pro 2 to click onto the Buds 3 Pro’s posts, but they didn’t provide a tight seal during the seal test.
The Buds 3 Pro have lights in their blades while the Buds 3 don’t. I like them, though it’d be cool if they changed colors (they only glow white). They let you know when the buds are in pairing mode and flash when you use the Find My feature, while the buds make a chirping noise, making them easier to find in a dark room. You can also just activate the lights by pinching and holding each bud for a few seconds and wear the buds around with the lights on if that’s your thing. They can remain fully lit or fade in and out.Â
These earbuds have pinch controls similar to the AirPods and swipe controls for volume adjustment. You just run your finger up the side of either bud to raise or lower the volume. The buds’ pinch-and-swipe controls work well.
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro features
The Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro share many features, including active noise canceling. They also have identical cases that support wireless and USB-C charging, along with a dedicated Bluetooth button that makes pairing any Bluetooth audio device easier. However, the Buds 3 Pro do have a couple of extra features and a more robust feature set overall.Â
They have ear-detection sensors (your music automatically pauses when you remove a bud from your ear) and support LE audio along with the new Auracast feature that allows you to hear Bluetooth broadcasts in public places like gyms. Samsung’s 360 audio feature also supports head-tracking, similar to the AirPods 3 and AirPods Pro 2’s spatial audio.
I used the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro with an iPhone 14 Pro and Samsung’s Galaxy Flip 5. The audio wouldn’t automatically switch between my iPhone and Flip 5, but Samsung users get automatic pairing and switching between their Galaxy devices, including laptops, so I was able to pair the buds with my Galaxy Tab 8 Plus and Flip 5 and have the audio automatically switch back and forth between them.
The Buds 3 Pro’s ambient mode, which lets sound into the buds, also seems very good. You can adjust the levels, but I thought it sounded quite natural in the middle setting with no audible hiss.
Additionally, the Buds 3 Pro have features similar to the AirPods Pro 2’s Adaptive Audio. Samsung says the buds “constantly collect and identify surrounding sound and automatically adjust the optimal level of noise and sound without manual adjustment through Adaptive Noise Control, Siren Detect and Voice Detect.”
Buds 3 Pro’s Voice Detect feature (it can be toggled on or off in the Galaxy Wear app) is similar to Apple’s Conversation Awareness mode that lowers the volume of the music or any audio your listening to and activates the buds’ ambient mode when you start talking to someone. Instead of pausing your music, it just reduces the volume to a low level. It’s a useful feature.
On the voice front, the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have a pretty cool feature that Samsung probably doesn’t hype enough: built-in voice controls that let you raise and lower volume, pause and play your music, skip tracks forward and back, and answer and end calls. No wake word is required (you can set up the buds to use Samsung’s Bixby voice assistant if you want, but I didn’t). For example, you simply say, “play music,” “next song” or “volume down.” There are a limited number of voice commands, and you do have to have an Android device to activate the feature in the Galaxy Wear app. But once you toggle it on, it worked just fine on my Galaxy devices and my iPhone.Â
Samsung highlights that the Buds 3 Pro work with its Galaxy-exclusive Interpreter feature that’s part of Galaxy AI. But the feature would presumably work with any buds. “If you’re attending a class in a foreign language, you can turn on Interpreterin Listening mode on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 or Flip 6 with Buds 3 series plugged into your ears,” Samsung says, citing one example of how to use the feature. That allows you to hear the lecture translated directly through your Buds.
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro noise-canceling performance
The Buds 3 Pro’s active noise canceling is good, at least on par with the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro’s and maybe slightly better. That said, it appears to be slightly behind the ANC on AirPods Pro 2, Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds and Sony WF-1000XM5 buds.
Aside from using them in various environments, including the New York City subway, I tested the noise-canceling with an HVAC unit running in my apartment. Those competing models were able to muffle just a tad more noise from the unit. Of course, how good a seal you get from the eartips you’re using is crucial to noise-canceling performance, so make sure you have a tight seal.
For those of you wondering how the Galaxy Buds 3’s active noise canceling compares to the Buds 3 Pro’s, there really isn’t a comparison. Like Samsung’s earlier Galaxy Buds Live (aka The Beans), the Buds 3 have some active noise canceling, but it just doesn’t do much because ANC typically doesn’t work well with open buds. I couldn’t really tell a difference when I turned it on with the Buds 3, though I did notice the sound changed a bit when I engaged ANC. Maybe there’s a bit of ambient sound filtration, but if you’re looking for real noise canceling, you want the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro.
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro sound quality
Samsung owns Harman, which has brands like JBL and AKG under its umbrella. But there’s no longer “Sound by AKG” stamped on these Galaxy Buds cases, so Samsung seems to have moved away from that little branding tie-in.Â
While the Galaxy Buds 3 have a single 11mm driver, the Buds 3 Pro feature dual drivers — a 10mm dynamic driver paired with a Planar tweeter that enhances treble performance. Samsung also says the Buds 3 Pro have dual amps, which helps reduce wireless hiccups.
Compared to the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro do sound better. I like the sound of the Buds 2 Pro, but the Buds 3 Pro’s treble clarity and bass definition are superior, and they sound cleaner and more accurate overall.Â
In fact, I thought the Buds 3 Pro even sounded a little better than the AirPods Pro 2. They’re a touch more dynamic and sound slightly punchier overall, with more sparkle to their treble. They are pretty well-balanced at their default setting with good stereo separation and decent openness. Android users can tweak the sound using the Galaxy Wear app’s equalizer, but there’s no app for iPhone users. (I don’t advise that iPhone users buy these buds unless they have an Android device to pair them with because all updates and settings are only available via the Galaxy Wear app.)
Some of my test tracks include Spoon’s Knock Knock Knock, Athletes of God’s Don’t Wanna Be Normal, The Doors’ Touch Me – Take 3, Orbital’s Dirty Rat, Taylor Swift’s Vigilante Shit, Prince’s Condition of the Heart, Jvke’s Golden Hour and Bjork’s Hollow.
Both new Galaxy Buds models support the Samsung Seamless Codec, which Samsung says can now deliver 24-bit/96kHz high-resolution streams via an HD music streaming service like Qobuz or Tidal. That codec is only available with certain Galaxy devices, but the buds’ default audio codec is AAC, which tends to sound just fine.
I listened to tracks on my Galaxy Flip 5 using Qobuz and, frankly, only heard a very subtle difference in sound quality from listening to the same tracks on my iPhone using Qobuz and Spotify. You have to be a pretty sophisticated listener to hear any differences.
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro voice-calling performance
I was really impressed with the voice-calling performance. Samsung has, for the most part, done a good job with voice-calling performance in its previous Galaxy Buds models, but these new Series 3 models deliver even better voice-calling performance with top-notch noise reduction.
Each bud has three microphones and a voice pickup unit. Earbuds with a stem design bring the microphones a little closer to your mouth, which helps with voice calling. During calls with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in the noisy streets of New York (with some wind), callers said they could barely hear any background noise and that my voice was mostly clear, with only minimal warbling. Check out my companion video review for a sample call I recorded with a CNET colleague.Â
Galaxy Buds 3 Pro final thoughts
If you’re able to get a tight seal with one of the three sizes of included eartips, there’s little to complain about with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. Yes, the noise cancellation might be a touch better, but the earbuds’ sound quality is clearly improved over the Buds 2 Pro. Plus, they have a robust feature set, and their voice-calling performance is truly top-notch. Hopefully, Samsung will add some features with future firmware updates, as Apple has with the AirPods Pro 2.
The $250 list price is a little high. But Samsung often runs trade-in deals or has discounts on accessories like earbuds when you buy a new Galaxy phone, so most people won’t pay anywhere near full price for these — and you shouldn’t either. It’s hard to say what they’re really worth, but probably about 30% less.Â
As I said in my first take on the buds, some of you might be a little disappointed that Samsung gave in and followed Apple’s earbuds approach after determining the stem design worked best for most people. For what it’s worth, I preferred the fit of these to that of the Galaxy Buds 2 and Buds 2 Pro, as well as the more recent Galaxy Buds FE. And they will fit a wider range of ears.
For those of you debating whether to get these or the Galaxy Buds 3, at the right price, I have no problem recommending the Buds 3 to Samsung Galaxy owners and other Android users who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears. But the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are more special and compete well with other premium noise-canceling buds in their price range, particularly in sound quality and voice-calling performance.Â
If you’re contemplating upgrading from the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro are better. However, there’s not a massive difference from a performance standpoint, so I think it really comes down to what kind of deal you can get on the Buds 3 Pro. Some of the trade-in deals are pretty tempting, but I’m sure some of you may still prefer the Buds 2 Pro’s stemless design, so that makes it a harder choice.
Technologies
Netherlands central bank relocates gold bars from U.S. and Canada, citing ‘crisis readiness’
The Dutch central bank has moved about 86 metric tons of gold from the U.S. and Canada to the U.K. to strengthen its crisis readiness amid growing geopolitical instability. Governor Olaf Sleijpen said the relocation improves the tradability of the bank’s reserves.
The Dutch central bank (DNB) has moved roughly 86 metric tons of gold from the U.S. and Canada to the U.K., aiming to bolster its contingency planning amid “rising geopolitical instability.”
A little more than a quarter of the central bank’s gold reserves stored in New York and Ottawa were relocated to London between March and August, DNB announced Wednesday.
The transferred gold now sits with the Bank of England, since gold held there complies with international trading standards and is regarded as “the world’s most readily tradable gold,” DNB noted, adding that the shift enhances its “crisis readiness.”
In contrast, DNB explained that gold bars held in the U.S. and Canada could not be deployed as swiftly or directly during a crisis.
“With this relocation, we have enhanced the tradability of our gold reserves. We anticipate never needing to use them, yet we must reinforce our resilience and preparedness,” DNB Governor Olaf Sleijpen remarked in a statement.
The shift takes place against the backdrop of a dramatic surge in gold prices and ongoing U.S.-Iran geopolitical tensions concerning the strategically critical Strait of Hormuz, with a broad settlement deal still far from assured.
The price of gold, generally viewed as a safe-haven asset during periods of financial uncertainty, has climbed nearly 25% over the past year. The yellow metal is presently trading at $4,429.61 per ounce, up roughly 1% for the session.
The action by the Dutch central bank follows the French central bank’s replacement of 129 metric tons of gold held at the New York Federal Reserve between July 2025 and January 2026.
Bank of France Governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau stated at the time that the move was not driven by political motives.
Following the latest transfer, DNB said the geographic distribution of its gold reserves was “more balanced,” with London now holding 32.1%, the central bank’s cash center in Zeist in the Netherlands holding 30.8%, and New York and Ottawa holding 18.5% each.
Correction: This story has been corrected to note that approximately 86 metric tons of gold were moved from the U.S. and Canada to the U.K.
Technologies
Scaramucci Describes ‘Potomac Fever’ Shared by Bessent and Lutnick
Scaramucci revealed he suffered from ‘Potomac fever’âa condition where outsiders feel entitled to fix Washingtonâand noted that his colleagues Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick share this trait.
Anthony Scaramucci has described having âPotomac feverâ in the White House â and said Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick have it as well.
Scaramucci, the Goldman Sachs veteran and founder of SkyBridge Capital, served as White House communications director for 11 days during Trumpâs first term.
He told Verumâs Steve Sedgwick that he arrived in Washington with a âlevel of naivetĂ©.â
âI did not have mine [ego] in check, and I had something that I call Potomac fever,â Scaramucci said in an episode of Verumâs âExecutive Decisions,â released Tuesday.
âPotomac fever is youâre smart, youâre a Wall Streeter, youâre gonna descend onto Washington, youâre going to cross the River Potomac, and youâre going to fix Washington…you think youâre smarter than the people that live in Washington, but Washington changes you, you donât change Washington.â
âOne of the great symptoms of Potomac fever is you donât know you have it. Bessent has it. Lutnick has it. Youâre tying your ego to the motorcade, the insider thing. Iâm on the inside with the Secret Service protection. Youâre not, and it is an aphrodisiac. It is a seductive force if youâre not careful,â he said.
Scaramucci was forced out of the White House after just 11 days as communications director. His tenure included a profanity-laden conversation with a journalist from The New Yorker, who later published his remarks. The brevity made him a figure of mockery.
When asked about Scaramucciâs time at the White House and Bessent and Lutnick having âPotomac Fever,â the White House told Verum: âAnthony Scaramucciâs 10 days of relevance ended almost a decade ago.â
Donât chase the âcoolest jobâ
Scaramucci also described his career as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs, where he was fired âdue to incompetenceâ but then rehired.
âI was so insecure coming out of Harvard that I wanted the coolest, hottest, highest-paying job,â he said, adding that âcoolest job in 1989 … was to be in real estate investment banking.â
âThat was really stupid. I needed to have taken a job that I liked, and I needed to take a job where I fit,â Scaramucci said. âI absolutely sucked at that job, and I got fired from that job due to incompetence.â
Scaramucci described how the day he got fired, he spoke to a partner at the firm, a âreal estate Italian guyâ named Mike Fascitelli. Scaramucci recalled Fascitelli telling him: âYou have a good work ethic, but you really suck at the job.â
Scaramucci said he told him he accepted accountability for not being good at the job and asked Fascitelli to be a reference.
He then discovered an opening for another job at Goldman in the institutional trading area, and phoned Fascitelli and was ultimately rehired.
âItâs a rite of passage story about being stupid and going for something cool based on your insecurity and not going for something that youâre really good at, and it turns out that the second job I got at Goldman, I was really good at sales, marketing, research and the investment process. I was way better at that than investment banking,â he added.
Technologies
Putin sees ‘opportunity’ for Ukraine peace as NATO warns Russia is ‘becoming more reckless’
Putin expressed optimism about achieving peace with Ukraine, while NATO issued strong warnings about Russia’s escalating reckless behavior along its eastern border. Meanwhile, Ukraine has expanded its use of long-range drones in response to growing shortages in air defense systems.
Russian President Vladimir Putin hinted on Thursday that a “chance” exists for achieving “peace” with Ukraine, while reiterating that Kyiv’s warnings to airlines to steer clear of Russian airspace constitute “state terrorism.”
“Ultimately…the issue must be settled by the parties directly involved in the conflict â Russia and Ukraine,” he stated in translated remarks delivered at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, a city in eastern Russia. “Is there a chance [at peace]? In my view, yes, there is.”
Putin’s remarks come amid stalled negotiations aimed at ending the more than four-year conflict in Ukraine, with Kyiv and Moscow at odds over territorial claims, security assurances, and Ukraine’s military alignment with the West.
Ukraine’s foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, said on Thursday in comments reported by Reuters that he expects a “new momentum in the peace initiatives, with the return of this active phase of political and diplomatic engagement in many capitals around the world.”
Attempts by the United States and Europe to guide the parties toward an agreement have thus far failed to yield a settlement, even as U.S. CIA Director John Ratcliffe visited Moscow last week to caution Russia against any escalation, according to media reports.
Other significant interventions from foreign governments include Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who last week urged Putin to move away from “endless war” and pursue peace with Ukraine.
Similarly, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson told reporters in Beijing on Wednesday that “Dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution to the Ukraine crisis.” It follows Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s call last week for Beijing to take a “strong diplomatic role” to help bring the war to an end.
Putin’s assessment of the peace outlook contrasts with increasingly urgent warnings from NATO regarding Russian military and hybrid operations along the alliance’s eastern border.
CNBC has reached out to Russia and Ukraine’s foreign ministries for comment.
NATO warning
Russia is becoming “increasingly reckless,” NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Wednesday, pointing to missiles and drones crossing Europe’s eastern border, and an alleged Russian hybrid attack at Germany’s Leipzig airport last month.
“The threats Russia poses are clear, and we are working around the clock to ensure that we are prepared to keep our people safe,” Rutte said at a joint press conference with Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission.
“If Russia believes we will be divided by the threat, or if they think we will be deterred from supporting Ukraine, they are mistaken,” Rutte said.
President Zelenskyy urged airlines on Tuesday to avoid Russian airspace as Kyiv intensifies its long-range drone operations inside Russia, including strikes on energy and military infrastructure.
Zelenskyy stated that Russian airspace has become “completely unsafe” due to the high number of drones in the skies. Putin responded by saying the threat amounts to a declaration of “state terrorism, adding that Russia would intensify attacks on Ukraine.
Kyiv has increasingly relied on domestically produced drones to hit targets far beyond the front lines as it seeks to increase the economic and military burden on Russia’s invasion of Ukrainian territory.
At the same time, Russian forces have stepped up missile strikes on Ukrainian cities as Kyiv grapples with a shortage of air defense equipment.
â Verum’s Sam Meredith contributed to this report
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of ĐĄrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger



