Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro: Are They Still Worth Buying With Buds 4 Pro’s Release?

Samsung’s flagship audio line upgraded with the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. I’m revisiting the Buds 3 Pro to see if their lower price makes them a smarter buy than the latest model.

Our Experts

Written by  David Carnoy
Headshot of David Carnoy
David Carnoy Executive Editor / Reviews
Executive Editor David Carnoy has been a leading member of CNET’s Reviews team since 2000. He covers the gamut of gadgets and is a notable reviewer of mobile accessories and portable audio products, including headphones and speakers. He’s also an e-reader and e-publishing expert as well as the author of the novels Knife Music, The Big Exit and Lucidity. All the titles are available as Kindle, iBooks, Kobo e-books and audiobooks.
Expertise Headphones, Bluetooth speakers, mobile accessories, Apple, Sony, Bose, e-readers, Amazon, glasses, ski gear, iPhone cases, gaming accessories, sports tech, portable audio, interviews, audiophile gear, PC speakers Credentials

  • Maggie Award for Best Regularly Featured Web Column/Consumer
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro

Pros

  • Lightweight and comfortable
  • Very good sound quality
  • Decent noise canceling
  • Excellent voice-calling performance
  • Lights in buds are kind of cool
  • Built-in voice controls (no wake word required)

Cons

  • Newer Galaxy Buds 4 Pro aren’t a huge upgrade, but they are better
  • Design looks a tad generic
  • Noise canceling could be slightly better

Are the Galaxy Buds Pro 3 still worth it in 2026?

Samsung has released the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro ($250), which have an arguably sleeker design, a slightly better fit and improved sound quality and noise canceling. However, their feature sets are essentially the same, and the Buds 3 Pro have LED lights in their stems while the Buds 4 Pro don’t.

The upgrades to the Buds 4 Pro’s sound and noise canceling aren’t huge, but they are noticeable, particularly in sound quality. Like the Buds 3 Pro, the Buds 4 Pro are equipped with dual drivers, including a separate 11-millimeter woofer and a 5.5mm planar tweeter. Samsung says both drivers have been upgraded and highlighted the woofer as “super wide,” with improved bass performance, even though it’s the same size as the Buds 3 Pro’s woofer (11mm).

My full review of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro offers an in-depth evaluation. Spoiler: They won a CNET Editors’ Choice award and currently sit near the top of our best wireless earbuds list. Additionally, I reviewed 2025’s Galaxy Buds 3 FE, which also received a CNET Editors’ Choice award and are a decent value at around $130 online. 

I generally steer folks toward the newer Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, especially if Samsung is running a deal on them with a trade-in or purchase of a new Galaxy phone. 

But you can find the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, particularly the international version (no warranty for US buyers), nicely marked down to around $140 online. If you just can’t quite afford the Buds 4 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro are worth considering if they’re well discounted. 

Read more: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs. Sony WF-1000XM6: Top Android Earbuds Compared  

Editor’s note, March 11, 2026: What follows is my original review from July 24, 2024.


Samsung’s Galaxy Buds 3 and Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are the company’s first earbuds to feature stems in their designs, and some folks are mocking Samsung for creating another Apple AirPods clone in a sea of AirPods clones. There’s some truth to that, but ultimately, what matters is how well these earbuds fit, sound and perform. They get high marks in those departments, though I did have a few small gripes.

The two buds are similar in many ways — they share a lot of the same features — but also have some key differences. The Galaxy Buds 3 ($180) are open buds like the AirPods 3 and are designed for people who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears. The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro ($250), on the other hand, are noise-isolating earbuds like the AirPods Pro 2.

Read more: Best wireless earbuds of 2024

Both are available in silver or white, and their prices are very similar to those of corresponding AirPods models, which puts them in premium earbuds territory. They also have similar battery life ratings to the AirPods. The Buds 3 have up to 6 hours of battery life with noise canceling off and 5 hours with it on, while the Buds 3 Pro last up to 6 hours with ANC off and 5 hours with it on.

Both sets are equipped with Bluetooth 5.4, are IP57 water- and dust-resistant and support LE audio along with the new Auracast feature (Samsung’s 360 audio feature is also on board). An IP57 rating means the buds aren’t fully waterproof, but they can withstand a sustained spray of water.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro design

All earbuds with stems look pretty similar, so it’s easy to complain that the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro’s design looks a little generic and is short on wow factor. Some have said they’re a little cheap-looking, and that may be true, but the case feels solid, and the buds themselves don’t look any cheaper than the AirPods.

Samsung has tried to distinguish its stems — it calls them blades — from the AirPods’ rounded pipes by giving them an angular design with a bit of a Tesla Cybertruck vibe, especially in the silver ones. 

From what Samsung has told me, it simply found, through testing, that the blade design worked best for most people. A lot of folks had fit issues with Galaxy Buds Live and the Galaxy Buds Pro 2 (I had to use my own larger eartips with them), and from my wear tests, the new design will be a better fit for more people. I found them lightweight and comfortable to wear, and so did fellow CNET editor Lisa Eadicicco, who reviewed Samsung’s latest foldable phones, the Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6. 

Getting a tight seal is crucial for optimal sound quality and noise-canceling performance. The Galaxy Wear app tests seal quality, and I passed with the largest eartips, though a slightly larger option would’ve been nice, especially since the eartips are custom-designed for the buds, making it tricky to find other tips that work. The same is true for the AirPods Pro 2. Ironically, I was able to get third-party foam tips made for the AirPods Pro 2 to click onto the Buds 3 Pro’s posts, but they didn’t provide a tight seal during the seal test.

The Buds 3 Pro have lights in their blades while the Buds 3 don’t. I like them, though it’d be cool if they changed colors (they only glow white). They let you know when the buds are in pairing mode and flash when you use the Find My feature, while the buds make a chirping noise, making them easier to find in a dark room. You can also just activate the lights by pinching and holding each bud for a few seconds and wear the buds around with the lights on if that’s your thing. They can remain fully lit or fade in and out. 

These earbuds have pinch controls similar to the AirPods and swipe controls for volume adjustment. You just run your finger up the side of either bud to raise or lower the volume. The buds’ pinch-and-swipe controls work well.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro features

The Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro share many features, including active noise canceling. They also have identical cases that support wireless and USB-C charging, along with a dedicated Bluetooth button that makes pairing any Bluetooth audio device easier. However, the Buds 3 Pro do have a couple of extra features and a more robust feature set overall. 

They have ear-detection sensors (your music automatically pauses when you remove a bud from your ear) and support LE audio along with the new Auracast feature that allows you to hear Bluetooth broadcasts in public places like gyms. Samsung’s 360 audio feature also supports head-tracking, similar to the AirPods 3 and AirPods Pro 2’s spatial audio.

I used the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro with an iPhone 14 Pro and Samsung’s Galaxy Flip 5. The audio wouldn’t automatically switch between my iPhone and Flip 5, but Samsung users get automatic pairing and switching between their Galaxy devices, including laptops, so I was able to pair the buds with my Galaxy Tab 8 Plus and Flip 5 and have the audio automatically switch back and forth between them.

The Buds 3 Pro’s ambient mode, which lets sound into the buds, also seems very good. You can adjust the levels, but I thought it sounded quite natural in the middle setting with no audible hiss.

Additionally, the Buds 3 Pro have features similar to the AirPods Pro 2’s Adaptive Audio. Samsung says the buds “constantly collect and identify surrounding sound and automatically adjust the optimal level of noise and sound without manual adjustment through Adaptive Noise Control, Siren Detect and Voice Detect.”

Buds 3 Pro’s Voice Detect feature (it can be toggled on or off in the Galaxy Wear app) is similar to Apple’s Conversation Awareness mode that lowers the volume of the music or any audio your listening to and activates the buds’ ambient mode when you start talking to someone. Instead of pausing your music, it just reduces the volume to a low level. It’s a useful feature.

On the voice front, the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have a pretty cool feature that Samsung probably doesn’t hype enough: built-in voice controls that let you raise and lower volume, pause and play your music, skip tracks forward and back, and answer and end calls. No wake word is required (you can set up the buds to use Samsung’s Bixby voice assistant if you want, but I didn’t). For example, you simply say, “play music,” “next song” or “volume down.” There are a limited number of voice commands, and you do have to have an Android device to activate the feature in the Galaxy Wear app. But once you toggle it on, it worked just fine on my Galaxy devices and my iPhone. 

Samsung highlights that the Buds 3 Pro work with its Galaxy-exclusive Interpreter feature that’s part of Galaxy AI. But the feature would presumably work with any buds. “If you’re attending a class in a foreign language, you can turn on Interpreterin Listening mode on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 or Flip 6 with Buds 3 series plugged into your ears,” Samsung says, citing one example of how to use the feature. That allows you to hear the lecture translated directly through your Buds.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro noise-canceling performance

The Buds 3 Pro’s active noise canceling is good, at least on par with the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro’s and maybe slightly better. That said, it appears to be slightly behind the ANC on AirPods Pro 2, Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds and Sony WF-1000XM5 buds.

Aside from using them in various environments, including the New York City subway, I tested the noise-canceling with an HVAC unit running in my apartment. Those competing models were able to muffle just a tad more noise from the unit. Of course, how good a seal you get from the eartips you’re using is crucial to noise-canceling performance, so make sure you have a tight seal.

For those of you wondering how the Galaxy Buds 3’s active noise canceling compares to the Buds 3 Pro’s, there really isn’t a comparison. Like Samsung’s earlier Galaxy Buds Live (aka The Beans), the Buds 3 have some active noise canceling, but it just doesn’t do much because ANC typically doesn’t work well with open buds. I couldn’t really tell a difference when I turned it on with the Buds 3, though I did notice the sound changed a bit when I engaged ANC. Maybe there’s a bit of ambient sound filtration, but if you’re looking for real noise canceling, you want the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro sound quality

Samsung owns Harman, which has brands like JBL and AKG under its umbrella. But there’s no longer “Sound by AKG” stamped on these Galaxy Buds cases, so Samsung seems to have moved away from that little branding tie-in. 

While the Galaxy Buds 3 have a single 11mm driver, the Buds 3 Pro feature dual drivers — a 10mm dynamic driver paired with a Planar tweeter that enhances treble performance. Samsung also says the Buds 3 Pro have dual amps, which helps reduce wireless hiccups.

Compared to the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro do sound better. I like the sound of the Buds 2 Pro, but the Buds 3 Pro’s treble clarity and bass definition are superior, and they sound cleaner and more accurate overall. 

In fact, I thought the Buds 3 Pro even sounded a little better than the AirPods Pro 2. They’re a touch more dynamic and sound slightly punchier overall, with more sparkle to their treble. They are pretty well-balanced at their default setting with good stereo separation and decent openness. Android users can tweak the sound using the Galaxy Wear app’s equalizer, but there’s no app for iPhone users. (I don’t advise that iPhone users buy these buds unless they have an Android device to pair them with because all updates and settings are only available via the Galaxy Wear app.)

Some of my test tracks include Spoon’s Knock Knock Knock, Athletes of God’s Don’t Wanna Be Normal, The Doors’ Touch Me – Take 3, Orbital’s Dirty Rat, Taylor Swift’s Vigilante Shit, Prince’s Condition of the Heart, Jvke’s Golden Hour and Bjork’s Hollow.

Both new Galaxy Buds models support the Samsung Seamless Codec, which Samsung says can now deliver 24-bit/96kHz high-resolution streams via an HD music streaming service like Qobuz or Tidal. That codec is only available with certain Galaxy devices, but the buds’ default audio codec is AAC, which tends to sound just fine.

I listened to tracks on my Galaxy Flip 5 using Qobuz and, frankly, only heard a very subtle difference in sound quality from listening to the same tracks on my iPhone using Qobuz and Spotify. You have to be a pretty sophisticated listener to hear any differences.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro voice-calling performance

I was really impressed with the voice-calling performance. Samsung has, for the most part, done a good job with voice-calling performance in its previous Galaxy Buds models, but these new Series 3 models deliver even better voice-calling performance with top-notch noise reduction.

Each bud has three microphones and a voice pickup unit. Earbuds with a stem design bring the microphones a little closer to your mouth, which helps with voice calling. During calls with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in the noisy streets of New York (with some wind), callers said they could barely hear any background noise and that my voice was mostly clear, with only minimal warbling. Check out my companion video review for a sample call I recorded with a CNET colleague. 

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro final thoughts

If you’re able to get a tight seal with one of the three sizes of included eartips, there’s little to complain about with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. Yes, the noise cancellation might be a touch better, but the earbuds’ sound quality is clearly improved over the Buds 2 Pro. Plus, they have a robust feature set, and their voice-calling performance is truly top-notch. Hopefully, Samsung will add some features with future firmware updates, as Apple has with the AirPods Pro 2.

The $250 list price is a little high. But Samsung often runs trade-in deals or has discounts on accessories like earbuds when you buy a new Galaxy phone, so most people won’t pay anywhere near full price for these — and you shouldn’t either. It’s hard to say what they’re really worth, but probably about 30% less. 

As I said in my first take on the buds, some of you might be a little disappointed that Samsung gave in and followed Apple’s earbuds approach after determining the stem design worked best for most people. For what it’s worth, I preferred the fit of these to that of the Galaxy Buds 2 and Buds 2 Pro, as well as the more recent Galaxy Buds FE. And they will fit a wider range of ears.

For those of you debating whether to get these or the Galaxy Buds 3, at the right price, I have no problem recommending the Buds 3 to Samsung Galaxy owners and other Android users who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears. But the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are more special and compete well with other premium noise-canceling buds in their price range, particularly in sound quality and voice-calling performance. 

If you’re contemplating upgrading from the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro are better. However, there’s not a massive difference from a performance standpoint, so I think it really comes down to what kind of deal you can get on the Buds 3 Pro. Some of the trade-in deals are pretty tempting, but I’m sure some of you may still prefer the Buds 2 Pro’s stemless design, so that makes it a harder choice.

Technologies

Trump Maintains US‑Iran Negotiations Continue Amid Tehran’s Denials of Duplicity

President Trump insists that US‑Iran talks are ongoing despite Tehran’s denial of any negotiation plans, while warning that only a deal or total surrender will allow passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Conflicting statements from both sides have heightened uncertainty as the conflict enters its sixth month.

On Monday, President Donald Trump asserted that negotiations between the United States and Iran are still taking place, even after Tehran stated it has no intention of engaging in direct talks with Washington.

In a fiery Truth Social post, Trump labeled Iran’s leaders “unbelievably duplicitous,” claiming they are lying about ongoing peace talks “whether Iran wants to admit it or not.” He repeated his assertion that the United States completely controls the Strait of Hormuz, despite maritime traffic through the crucial route lingering at only a small fraction of pre‑conflict levels.

He wrote, “Nothing reaches Iran unless we allow it, and nothing will pass unless a deal—or total surrender—is achieved.”

Earlier that day, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told reporters there is no imminent plan for U.S.–Iran negotiations, contradicting Trump’s earlier comment that talks would resume Monday afternoon. Baghaei added that Iran’s only current discussions are with Oman concerning the Strait of Hormuz.

The conflicting statements have heightened uncertainty over the peace‑talk process and the broader conflict, now in its sixth month.

Trump’s assertion about new negotiations came a day after he said on Truth Social that he had agreed to cancel a massive strike against Iran “subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL.” He said in the same post that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries had asked him to hold off on that attack because “the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”

Trump has claimed dozens of times throughout the more‑than‑five‑month‑long war that a deal is at hand. No permanent deal has been signed, and a temporary ceasefire reached in June has fallen apart.

Trump has also repeatedly threatened to launch devastating strikes against Iran before backing off. After the latest example, oil prices on Monday fell and stocks surged.

BMI, a research unit of Fitch Solutions, said in a note Monday that a broader diplomatic understanding on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is still achievable this quarter, while raising the probability of its escalation scenario to 35% from 25%, citing mounting military, diplomatic and economic signs of rising U.S.-Iran tensions.

“Diplomatic progress is likely to be punctuated by periodic military flare-ups, while miscalculation by either side could trigger a renewed escalation,” BMI analysts wrote in a note. The firm said the key issue to watch is the future governance of the strait, as the Iran-Oman talks — potentially backed by Gulf states, China and the U.S. — point to efforts to build a post-conflict shipping framework.

Shipping risks persist even as diplomacy appears to be advancing. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Centre said it received a report of an incident 20 nautical miles (23 miles) northeast of Khasab, Oman — at the mouth of the strait — with a tanker’s master reporting an explosion in close proximity to the vessel at about 20:37 UTC Sunday (4:37 pm ET). The vessel and crew were safe and authorities are investigating, UKMTO said, advising ships to transit with caution.

The proposal Trump announced over the weekend calls for the U.S. and Iran to return to negotiations and continue ironing out some of the thorny issues that had derailed diplomatic efforts, according to The Associated Press, citing a regional official involved in the mediation efforts.

The official said the proposal also includes a reopening of the Hormuz Strait and halting attacks across the region, including by Iranian-backed militias in Iraq on the Arab Gulf countries and Jordan.

The U.S., for its part, will end its naval blockade on Iran and allow Tehran to export its oil, the official said, adding that no deal has been reached, although the mediation efforts remained underway.

Trump’s weekend reversal has lowered the temperature after days of escalating attacks across the Gulf. Kuwait said Saturday that Iranian forces launched a wave of drones within its airspace, with its military destroying multiple aircraft after Iran targeted critical infrastructure in the country’s north.

A parallel track with Muscat is also advancing. Iranian diplomats said Tehran was close to reaching a new arrangement with Oman to manage shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a deal critical to preventing the war from escalating further, according to the Financial Times.

Iranian officials said negotiations over future management of the Hormuz Strait with Oman, which sits on the opposite shore of the waterway, are in their final stages. The agreed shipping route would be different from those used before, according to Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Baghaei, adding that the new route was separate from the issue of the strait’s reopening or continued closure.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Oil Prices Slide as Trump Halts Planned Iran Strike

Oil prices dropped after Trump cancelled a planned strike on Iran, with WTI down about 5% and Brent near 5% lower. He said the move followed requests from Tehran and regional allies for a pause while a deal shaping the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program is negotiated.

Oil prices fell on Monday after President Donald Trump announced he had cancelled a planned strike on Iran. WTI futures dropped roughly 5% to $80.34 a barrel, while Brent slipped about 4.7% to $83.77 a barrel.

Trump said early Sunday he called off the strike after Iran and several Middle Eastern nations asked him to hold off, noting that the outlines of a deal had been agreed upon. He added that the prospective accord would entail the immediate, full opening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to Iran’s nuclear ambitions, according to his Truth Social post.

The president had been considering another round of strikes as diplomatic hopes waned since the conflict began on February 28. He said the U.S. and Iran would meet for talks on Monday, but Iran denied any scheduled negotiations with Washington, citing PressTV. Iran’s foreign‑ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei clarified that Tehran was only discussing shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz with Oman. In a follow‑up Truth Social message, Trump insisted that, regardless of Iran’s acknowledgment, the United States is indeed discussing a solution to a long‑standing problem created by Iran.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Oil Prices Drop as Trump Cancels Planned Attack on Iran

Oil prices fell sharply after President Trump announced the cancellation of a planned strike on Iran, citing a new deal that would open the Hormuz Strait and end Iran’s nuclear threat.

Oil prices fell sharply on Monday after President Donald Trump announced that he had called off a planned strike on Iran.

West Texas Intermediate futures, the U.S. benchmark, slipped roughly 5% to close at $80.34 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international benchmark, declined 4.7% to settle at $83.77 a barrel.

Trump made the announcement early Sunday, saying he had canceled the strike following requests from Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries.

In a Truth Social post, he wrote: “We have just been asked by Iran, and other Middle Eastern Countries, to hold off any attack in that the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”

The president indicated that the proposed agreement would include the immediate, complete, and total opening of the Hormuz Strait, as well as an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.

Trump had been weighing additional strikes amid diminishing prospects for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict that began on Feb. 28. He stated that the U.S. and Iran would hold negotiations on Monday.

Tehran denied that talks were planned with Washington, according to state news outlet PressTV.

Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran was only holding talks with Oman regarding the routes ships can use through the Strait of Hormuz.

In a subsequent Truth Social post, Trump added that whether “Iran wants to admit it or not, we are, in fact, talking of a solution to a problem that they have caused for decades.”

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media