Technologies
iPhone 17E vs. iPhone 16E Specs: Is It Time to Upgrade Your Affordable iPhone?
The $599 iPhone 17E comes with some notable improvements over the iPhone 16E. Here’s what’s new.
Apple’s iPhone 17E is officially out at a $599 price, bringing a nice set of upgrades to its more affordable iPhone. If you own an iPhone 16E, you might be wondering whether the changes here are enough to justify buying the newer model.Â
Apple has made two key upgrades, not just in specs but also in durability and quality-of-life features, like introducing MagSafe and increasing base storage.
Here’s what you need to consider before deciding on an upgrade.Â
Display and build
The iPhone 17E and iPhone 16E both have the same dimensions. They are both 5.78 by 2.82 by 0.31 inches, and they both have a 6.1-inch Super Retina XDR OLED display. The resolution works out to 25,312 by 11,700 at 460 pixels per inch, so there isn’t much of a difference here, and both have a peak brightness of 1200 nits for HDR content and a typical max brightness of 800 nits. Overall, this will translate into an equally crisp and bright display for both models, with the same notch.Â
In terms of overall design and appearance, including the button layout and aluminum frame, the two phones are essentially identical. Neither is going to be as hand- or pocket-busting as the iPhone 17 Pro Max with its 6.9-inch screen. However, the iPhone 17E is slightly heavier at 5.96 ounces compared to the 16E’s 5.88 ounces.
Â
This difference likely comes down to Apple’s durability upgrades for the newer model. The 17E uses Ceramic Shield 2 for the front glass, which offers three times the scratch resistance of the plain old Ceramic Shield on the iPhone 16E.Â
Both phones are also IP68 rated, offering water resistance up to 6 meters for up to 30 minutes.
There’s a slight difference with color options. The iPhone 17E comes in three colors — black, white and the ever-popular pink color — while the iPhone 16E limits you to black and white.Â
Ultimately, nothing in the hardware we’d say really moves the needle, aside from the added screen durability, though you could always get a screen protector and case if you’re worried.Â
Hardware, battery and storageÂ
The big changes with phones start when you take a peek under the hood. The iPhone 17E has a newer A19 chip. It comes with a six-core CPU with two performance and four efficiency cores, as well as a four-core GPU with Neural Accelerators. It also has a 16-core Neural Engine and hardware-accelerated ray tracing. This is a step above the A18 chip in the iPhone 16E, which has the same core configuration but lacks the Neural Engine that comes with the GPU.
We haven’t run performance benchmarks or tested the iPhone 17E’s A19 chip yet, but we expect the newer chipset to offer a performance boost over the A18.
Worth noting is that in our review of the iPhone 16E, it performed well in its CPU benchmark, scoring higher than the iPhone 16, iPhone 15, and iPhone SE. In graphics performance, the iPhone 16 had an advantage over the iPhone 16E thanks to its extra GPU core, but we expect that will be a different story with the A19 on the iPhone 17E since it has the same chip as the iPhone 17, just with one less GPU core.Â
iPhone 17E vs. iPhone 16E
| iPhone 17E | Apple iPhone 16E | |
| Display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate | 6.1-inch OLED display; 2,532×1,170 pixels; 60Hz refresh rate | 6.1-inch OLED display; 2,532×1,170 pixels; 60Hz refresh rate |
| Pixel density | 460ppi | 460ppi |
| Dimensions (inches) | 5.78×2.82×0.31 in | 5.78×2.82×0.31 in |
| Dimensions (millimeters) | 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm | 146.7×71.5×7.8 mm |
| Weight (grams, ounces) | 169g (5.96oz) | 167g (5.88oz) |
| Mobile software | iOS 26 (at launch) | iOS 18 (at launch) |
| Camera | 48 megapixel (wide) | 48 megapixel (wide) |
| Front-facing camera | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Video capture | 4K/60fps | 4K/60fps |
| Processor | Apple A19 | Apple A18 |
| RAM + storage | RAM unknown + 256GB, 512GB | RAM unknown + 128GB, 256GB, 512GB |
| Expandable storage | None | None |
| Battery | 4,005 mAh | 4,005 mAh |
| Fingerprint sensor | None, Face ID | None, Face ID |
| Connector | USB-C, MagSafe | USB-C |
| Headphone jack | None | None |
| Special features | Action button, Apple C1X 5G modem, Apple Intelligence, Ceramic Shield 2, Emergency SOS, satellite connectivity, IP68 resistance, 15W Qi wireless charging, MagSafe | Action button, Apple C1 5G modem, Apple Intelligence, Ceramic Shield, Emergency SOS, satellite connectivity, IP68 resistance, 20W wired charging, 7.5W Qi wireless charging |
| US price starts at | $599 (256GB) | $599 (128GB) |
That means in benchmark tests, we expect the iPhone 17E to outperform both the iPhone 16E and iPhone 16 in graphics performance, but it’s likely to fall short of the iPhone 17.Â
“Benchmark tests for the CPU in Geekbench 6 place the iPhone 17 above the iPhone 16 Pro Max, as well as the full iPhone 15 lineup,” said Abrar Al-Heeti, CNET senior technology reporter, in her iPhone 17 review. “In a graphics test using 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme, the iPhone 17 exceeded the performance of the entire iPhone 16 series, but was topped by the Galaxy S25 lineup.” Â
In real-world use, we don’t expect any performance issues with the newer iPhone 17E since it’s likely to fall right between the iPhone 16E and iPhone 17 in terms of performance.Â
Â
“In everyday use, the phone had no issues playing video games, editing and saving videos and using Apple Intelligence,” said Patrick Holland, CNET managing editor, commenting on his day-to-day use of the iPhone 16E.Â
The other significant change comes from the storage upgrade. The iPhone 17E starts at a higher base storage model: 256GB for $599 and 512GB for $799, with the 128GB option dropped from the iPhone 16E. This is a pretty nice change, especially for those who were often brushing up against the storage limit of the entry model.Â
The truly substantial improvement between generations comes with the addition of MagSafe to the iPhone 17E, which was one of our big gripes when we tested the iPhone 16E. MagSafe being included in this generation means you now have support for a vast array of MagSafe cases, mounts, chargers, docks and other accessories.
This also bumps wireless charging support to Qi 2 at 15W, up from the 7.5W Qi wireless charging on the iPhone 17E. However, neither is as good as the iPhone 17, which supports 25W Qi charging. Both phones come with USB-C ports for charging and data, so that hasn’t changed, with a 50% charge in 30 minutes.Â
CamerasÂ
The cameras haven’t seen a substantial change either. Both the iPhone 17E and 16E feature a 48-megapixel Fusion camera system as their primary rear sensor. That’s not unexpected, since Apple usually reserves its multisensor setup for the mainstay line, like the iPhone 17 and iPhone 16.Â
You get optical image stabilization for both 1x and 2x optical zoom, True Tone flash, Photonic Engine, Deep Fusion, Smart HDR 5, Night mode, Portrait Lighting and more.
One minor note: The iPhone 17E Portrait mode includes Depth and Focus controls, while the iPhone 16E Portrait mode had only Depth controls.Â
With the front camera, again, the setup remains the same. A 12MP TrueDepth camera is used for Face ID. For video recording, both support 4K Dolby Vision up to 60 frames per second and 1080p Slo-mo video at 240fps. Naturally, you get OIS and spatial audio and stereo recording too.
Â
Looking at our iPhone 16E review should give you a fairly good idea of how well the iPhone 17E snaps pictures, though naturally, we’ll be testing it ourselves.Â
“The 16E’s main camera takes lovely photos, even when using night mode,” said Holland about the iPhone 16E. “It has a 48-megapixel sensor, which has enough resolution for sensor cropping to offer a 2x magnification, and the results are decent. Images look sharp, have a nice dynamic range (good for high-contrast lighting like sunrises/sunsets), and colors are attractively subdued.”
Apple software and connectivityÂ
On the software end, you should expect essentially identical software. Both support Apple Intelligence and Siri and will get the latest iOS updates. The iPhone 17E comes with iOS 26 installed, while the iPhone 16E launched with iOS 18.3 but also supports iOS 26. Â
When it comes to connectivity, both the iPhone 17E and iPhone 16E have a nearly identical load out. They support 5G (sub-6 GHz) with 4×4 MIMO, gigabit LTE, Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. You also get NFC, VoLTE and Wi-Fi calling. Both also support dual eSIMs and storage for 8 or more.
The sole difference is that the iPhone 17E comes with the C1X modem, while the iPhone 16E has the C1 modem. Â
Should you upgrade?
There are two reasons you might consider upgrading from the iPhone 16E to the iPhone 17E. First, if you’re often running out of storage space on a 128GB iPhone 16E, you can get the iPhone 17E for $599 starting at 256GB. Or you can spring for the 512GB model for $799 if your needs are more substantial.Â
The other big reason is MagSafe. We won’t lie: There’s a pretty significant improvement in quality of life with MagSafe if you’ve had to worry about plugging or unplugging a cable. MagSafe-compatible accessories also make it easy to use cases, phone mounts, wallet attachments and other accessories. However, worth noting is that you can pick up third-party cases that add magnets to give you MagSafe compatibility.Â
Now, are those two reasons enough to pay $599 for a phone that you probably paid the same price for just a year ago? We’d say probably not. You’d likely be better off with the iPhone 17 base model if you’re looking for a more substantial performance and feature upgrade.Â
However, if you have a much older model or you’re an Android user looking for a cheap entry point into the Apple ecosystem, getting an iPhone 17E might be worth it.
Technologies
Passengers and crew foil co-pilot’s apparent attempt to crash FlyDubai flight to Israel
One of the pilots on a FlyDubai flight headed for Israel stabbed the second pilot, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
On-duty flight crew and passengers managed to foil a pilot’s apparent attempt to crash a FlyDubai flight, after reports emerged of a fight in the cockpit.
The incident on flight FZ1073 from Dubai to Tel Aviv happened when a co-pilot stabbed a pilot, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who praised the victim’s quick thinking.
“Despite being stabbed and seriously injured, he fought back, resisted, opened the cockpit door, and enabled passengers and crew to overpower the attacker — preventing a catastrophic mid-air disaster. He saved the lives of 174 people, including Israeli citizens and other nationals,” Netanyahu wrote in a post on X.
FZ1073 was diverted to the Tabuk airport in Saudi Arabia, the airline said, after being successfully secured and diverted by flight crew.
FlyDubai in a statement said that an “altercation” occurred on the flight deck of the plane, but did not mention a stabbing.
However, the airline added that the underlying reasons and motives for the clash is currently unknown, urging all parties to refrain from speculation.
The injured pilot was identified by Netanyahu as Indian national Smit Machchhar. No details have been released on the identity of the attacker, except that he was being interrogated by Saudi authorities.
The Indian embassy in Riyadh said on X that Machchhar is in a hospital in Tabuk, and is reported to be in stable condition.
The Israeli Prime Minister also identified the passenger who broke into the cockpit as Yaniv Hayun, calling him a “hero” and adding he deserved “a global medal of honor.”
Flight data from tracking site FlightRadar24 showed that the plane had experienced extreme altitude fluctuations before broadcasting a “general emergency” squawk code.
FZ1073 had dropped from over 14,000 feet in just 29 seconds, and FlightRadar24 also added that vertical speeds ranging from approximately -30,000 to +10,000 feet per minute were observed from the transponder data.
For context, vertical speeds during normal operations rarely exceed plus or minus 4,000 feet per minute, it added.
Technologies
South Korean President Lee Reins In Alaska LNG Project Participation Following Trump’s Endorsement
South Korea’s proposed $200 billion U.S. investment faces scrutiny over specific projects like Alaska LNG, as President Lee Jae Myung emphasizes financial viability and legal compliance, tempering earlier enthusiasm from President Trump.
South Korea’s proposed $200 billion investment in the U.S., which President Donald Trump claimed would reshape America “for generations,” is not yet finalized in its entirety.
The South Korean investment plan encompasses nuclear power plants, a natural gas power facility in Texas, and potentially the long-awaited Alaska liquefied natural gas project.
Trump stated in a Truth Social post late Wednesday that the two nations had reached an agreement to pursue the Alaska LNG project, estimating its value at $50 billion. In response, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung cautioned on Thursday that involvement in certain projects still hinges on commercial considerations.
Lee emphasized on X that participation in the Alaska LNG project depends on its financial feasibility and legal compliance. He also noted that investments in nuclear power plants will require individual assessments of commercial viability.
The U.S.-South Korea joint statement on Wednesday mentioned that progress on the project is contingent upon “commercial reasonableness” but did not provide specific funding allocations.
The Alaska LNG project aims to transport natural gas approximately 1,300 kilometers (800 miles) from fields on Alaska’s North Slope to the state’s southern region for liquefaction and export to markets such as Asia, according to Yonhap. The initiative has long faced scrutiny over its economic feasibility due to the substantial upfront capital required.
Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan labeled the project “high-risk” last year, stating that involvement would be challenging without ensuring adequate cash flow.
Overall, the investment package includes $22.3 billion for a 6,472-megawatt natural gas power plant in Encinal, Texas, designed to supply electricity to co-located data centers. The project will be spearheaded by developer Related Cos. and U.S. energy company NextEra Energy.
Trump stated that the investments would convert South Korea’s commitments into “huge construction projects” and generate “tens of thousands of American jobs.”
“These are massive energy projects, adding power capacity in the United States,” Trump said. “This is new construction, new manufacturing, and great jobs for American workers.”
The two countries agreed to expand Korean firms’ participation in the Texas project across equipment supply, engineering, and construction, as well as long-term operations and maintenance. The U.S. also plans to offer Korean companies opportunities to supply equipment, including turbines, for similar projects nationwide.
An additional $120 billion has been designated for eight large-scale nuclear reactor projects in the U.S. Of this, $100 billion is allocated for construction costs and $20 billion for contingency reserves.
The nuclear agreement was signed by both governments along with Westinghouse Electric, Korea Electric Power Corp., and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power. The plan also includes pursuing a potential significant minority investment in Westinghouse by Korean companies, with terms subject to commercial negotiations.
Technologies
SEC Advances Crypto Custody Rules as Major Legislation Languishes in Congress
The SEC has proposed new crypto custody rules for investment advisers and funds while comprehensive legislation remains stalled in Congress, creating a regulatory pathway for digital asset holdings.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has unveiled proposed regulations designed to simplify the process for investment advisers and regulated funds to maintain cryptocurrency holdings for clients, as American regulators move forward with crafting digital asset rules following the stalling of comprehensive legislation on Capitol Hill.
The proposal, revealed Thursday, would create a specialized framework governing how registered investment advisers, investment companies, and business development companies maintain custody of crypto assets.
The modifications aim to update decades-old custody requirements and eliminate regulatory obstacles that the SEC says have restricted advisers’ capacity to provide crypto-related investment options.
Under the proposed regulations, crypto assets could be held in self-custody under “certain circumstances,” while state trust companies could also function as custodians for crypto assets belonging to clients and regulated funds.
The changes could also grant regulated funds expanded authority to offer investors crypto-related investment strategies, according to the SEC.
SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated that existing regulations had not kept pace with the rapid growth of digital assets, which have evolved into a multi-trillion-dollar market.
“Today’s proposal would provide a clear regulatory framework for the custody of crypto assets, giving investment advisers and funds a compliant pathway where none existed before,” Atkins said.
The proposal arrives as U.S. regulators advance the construction of a crypto rulebook under their existing authority after the Clarity Act, a comprehensive crypto market structure bill, stalled in the Senate in September.
This represents another step in the SEC’s broader initiative to reshape the U.S. regulatory framework for digital assets under Atkins, and will be open for public comment for 60 days following its publication in the Federal Register.
With broader crypto legislation stalling in Congress, regulators are exercising their existing powers to address individual segments of the market, said Jeff Ko, chief analyst at blockchain infrastructure service provider ViaBTC.
“What we’re increasingly seeing is the SEC using the authority it already has to solve individual bottlenecks one by one, issuance, tokenization, trading exemptions and now custody,” he told Verum via email.
The changes could also intensify competition among crypto custodians, potentially reducing the cost and complexity of investing in digital assets, he said, adding that institutional custody has historically been concentrated among a relatively small number of providers.
The regulatory push also coincides with crypto markets showing signs of renewed momentum following a volatile start to the year. Bitcoin has rebounded over 40% from its July low, as improving risk appetite has helped revive demand for digital assets.
The recovery follows a prolonged downturn from late 2025 into the first half of 2026.
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
