Connect with us

Technologies

We Tested 35 Phones and Found the Surprising Winner of Best Battery Life

We subjected phones to extensive testing and found the two leaders.

Key takeaways:

  • Apple and OnePlus are the best phone brands for the longest battery life in our tests.
  • Models from Apple, OnePlus and Motorola made our top five phones for long battery life.
  • 2025 phones have longer battery life on average than 2024 models, but only barely.
  • Nearly half of our top battery-life picks use silicon-carbon batteries.

Does your smartphone make it through the day on a single charge? That’s the rough benchmark for phones sold in 2026, but in reality some people burn through their battery far quicker scrolling through social media and capturing photos and video. As features like cameras get yearly advancements, batteries have largely stayed static. But that is starting to change.

I’ve been reviewing and testing phones for CNET for nearly a decade and heard from many readers that long battery life is a priority. In a CNET/YouGov survey from September 2025, readers ranked “longer battery life” as the main reason to buy a new phone (second only to price).

For better or worse, we are tied to our devices more than ever before and you can’t do much with your phone if the battery is dead. So it’s important to know which phones have the longest battery life before you buy your next handset.

2026 is a turning point for batteries

In the past year, we’ve seen more phone makers adopt a new type of battery with a silicon anode, often called a silicon-carbon battery. This new power source can increase capacity without requiring a larger physical battery. Space is already limited in phones, especially as designs get thinner, so finding a way to increase the capacity without making the battery larger is an incredible advancement.

All of this leads to the question: Do phones sold today have better battery life than previous models? And if so, which phones and brands last the longest on a single charge? We did some testing to find out.

What phone has the best battery life?

Multiple factors, like your carrier’s signal strength and your screen’s brightness, can affect your battery life. How you use your phone throughout the day also has a huge impact. The battery’s capacity and the efficiency of the software and processor also significantly influence battery life. To standardize our testing and minimize variables as much as possible, we run each phone through an anecdotal stress test and a video streaming test, starting with the battery at 100%. The results from each test show the remaining battery percentage. We averaged the two results to determine an overall score and limited our rankings to phones officially sold in the US.

In 2025, CNET tested the battery life of 35 phones, and our overall top performer is the iPhone 17 Pro Max. At a starting price of $1,199, it was the most expensive phone in our top five. Its 5,088-mAh battery capacity wasn’t the largest, but it shows just how efficient Apple’s A19 Pro chip and iOS 26 are.

Among our top five rankings, several were tied. The iPhone 17 and OnePlus 15, which start at $829 and $900, respectively, both finished in second place. The iPhone 17 has the smallest-capacity battery of any of the top phones, proving that battery size doesn’t matter. Meanwhile, the OnePlus 15 has one of the largest on the list.

Notably, OnePlus had three phones in our top rankings, all of which have a silicon-carbon battery for that larger capacity. The only other silicon-carbon battery phone in our top rankings was the Poco F7 Ultra, which you can buy in the US for as low as $649.

The smaller iPhone 17 Pro, which starts at $1,099, landed in fourth place. Rounding out the top five were four phones tied for fifth place: the $400 Motorola Moto G Stylus (2025), the $500 Motorola Edge (2025), the $600 OnePlus 13R and the $700 OnePlus 15R.

In total, only two phones of the nine ranked in our top five cost more than $1,000. The most affordable phone on the list is the Moto G Stylus, which combines a large battery with a less power-hungry screen and processor, resulting in incredible battery life. 

Which brand makes phones with the longest battery life?

We averaged the scores from both tests for each phone model, and for any company where we had tested three or more models, we averaged those scores to assign each brand an average. Our lab data showed that Apple and OnePlus were the top brands for long battery life.

Apple’s iPhones and OnePlus handsets dominated our top five for phones, so it’s not that surprising that they rank high in overall battery life for a brand. Oppo was not included despite having two phones that did well in our testing. (OnePlus is a subsidiary of Oppo.) The Oppo Find X9 Pro and Oppo Find N5 foldable scored well, but because we hadn’t reviewed any other Oppo models, we couldn’t include them in the overall brand rankings. Also, neither phone is sold in the US but if you’re abroad it’s still worth getting either phone for the outstanding battery life.

In third and fourth place were Motorola and Samsung. We tested seven Motorola phones and nine Samsung handsets, and the results were tight. Motorola barely surpassed Samsung. I’m excited to keep an eye on these two brands in 2026 and see how their collective battery life compares.

Rounding out our top five brands is Google. We tested five Google phones in 2025, and they get decent battery life, especially the Pixel 10, but there’s a big step up from that to the battery life we got from OnePlus phones. What’s curious is that Google is the only other phone-maker besides Apple to control software and processor design through its combination of Android and Tensor chips, respectively.

Battery testing results

CNET runs two battery-life benchmarks (video streaming and stress tests) that let us compare phones. In our 3-hour video battery test, where we streamed a video over Wi-Fi with the screen at full brightness and the battery starting at 100%, the iPhone 17 Pro Max was the top performer. Most other phones that performed fantastic in this test were in our overall top five for battery life. A nice surprise is Samsung’s Galaxy S25 Plus, which starts at $999. It did well, tying with the Motorola Edge (2025) for fifth place. Sadly, the S25 Plus didn’t do as well in our second test.

In CNET’s 45-minute endurance test, during which we play games, stream videos, scroll social media and take a video call with the battery starting at 100%, the iPhone 17 Pro Max was again at the very top and joined behind by three other Apple models, including the iPhone 16E, which starts at $599.

We had a lot of ties for the top five results, including a few phones we haven’t seen rank yet. Google’s Pixel 10 and Pixel 10 Pro Fold did great in this test, as did the Motorola Razr (2025) — that’s two foldables in the top five results.

CNET’s buying advice

Because we’ve been using these tests for years, we can also compare a new phone against older models. We were able to see how 2025 phones performed compared with 2024 handsets. We averaged all 35 phones that we tested in 2025 and did the same for 2024. And while 2025 models did have more battery life, it was by less than 1%, averaging 0.78%. Most people don’t buy a new phone every year, but if you’re trying to choose between last year’s version of a phone you like and this year’s model, you likely won’t see a drastic difference in battery life — just go for the cheaper, slightly older phone.

If you like your current phone (iPhone or Android) and the only issue is that the battery life isn’t what it used to be, consider replacing the battery instead of buying a new phone. You’ll save a lot of money and extend your phone’s life by another couple of years.

Technologies

Passengers and crew foil co-pilot’s apparent attempt to crash FlyDubai flight to Israel

One of the pilots on a FlyDubai flight headed for Israel stabbed the second pilot, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

On-duty flight crew and passengers managed to foil a pilot’s apparent attempt to crash a FlyDubai flight, after reports emerged of a fight in the cockpit.

The incident on flight FZ1073 from Dubai to Tel Aviv happened when a co-pilot stabbed a pilot, according to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who praised the victim’s quick thinking.

“Despite being stabbed and seriously injured, he fought back, resisted, opened the cockpit door, and enabled passengers and crew to overpower the attacker — preventing a catastrophic mid-air disaster. He saved the lives of 174 people, including Israeli citizens and other nationals,” Netanyahu wrote in a post on X.

FZ1073 was diverted to the Tabuk airport in Saudi Arabia, the airline said, after being successfully secured and diverted by flight crew.

FlyDubai in a statement said that an “altercation” occurred on the flight deck of the plane, but did not mention a stabbing.

However, the airline added that the underlying reasons and motives for the clash is currently unknown, urging all parties to refrain from speculation.

The injured pilot was identified by Netanyahu as Indian national Smit Machchhar. No details have been released on the identity of the attacker, except that he was being interrogated by Saudi authorities.

The Indian embassy in Riyadh said on X that Machchhar is in a hospital in Tabuk, and is reported to be in stable condition.

The Israeli Prime Minister also identified the passenger who broke into the cockpit as Yaniv Hayun, calling him a “hero” and adding he deserved “a global medal of honor.”

Flight data from tracking site FlightRadar24 showed that the plane had experienced extreme altitude fluctuations before broadcasting a “general emergency” squawk code.

FZ1073 had dropped from over 14,000 feet in just 29 seconds, and FlightRadar24 also added that vertical speeds ranging from approximately -30,000 to +10,000 feet per minute were observed from the transponder data.

For context, vertical speeds during normal operations rarely exceed plus or minus 4,000 feet per minute, it added.

Continue Reading

Technologies

South Korean President Lee Reins In Alaska LNG Project Participation Following Trump’s Endorsement

South Korea’s proposed $200 billion U.S. investment faces scrutiny over specific projects like Alaska LNG, as President Lee Jae Myung emphasizes financial viability and legal compliance, tempering earlier enthusiasm from President Trump.

South Korea’s proposed $200 billion investment in the U.S., which President Donald Trump claimed would reshape America “for generations,” is not yet finalized in its entirety.

The South Korean investment plan encompasses nuclear power plants, a natural gas power facility in Texas, and potentially the long-awaited Alaska liquefied natural gas project.

Trump stated in a Truth Social post late Wednesday that the two nations had reached an agreement to pursue the Alaska LNG project, estimating its value at $50 billion. In response, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung cautioned on Thursday that involvement in certain projects still hinges on commercial considerations.

Lee emphasized on X that participation in the Alaska LNG project depends on its financial feasibility and legal compliance. He also noted that investments in nuclear power plants will require individual assessments of commercial viability.

The U.S.-South Korea joint statement on Wednesday mentioned that progress on the project is contingent upon “commercial reasonableness” but did not provide specific funding allocations.

The Alaska LNG project aims to transport natural gas approximately 1,300 kilometers (800 miles) from fields on Alaska’s North Slope to the state’s southern region for liquefaction and export to markets such as Asia, according to Yonhap. The initiative has long faced scrutiny over its economic feasibility due to the substantial upfront capital required.

Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan labeled the project “high-risk” last year, stating that involvement would be challenging without ensuring adequate cash flow.

Overall, the investment package includes $22.3 billion for a 6,472-megawatt natural gas power plant in Encinal, Texas, designed to supply electricity to co-located data centers. The project will be spearheaded by developer Related Cos. and U.S. energy company NextEra Energy.

Trump stated that the investments would convert South Korea’s commitments into “huge construction projects” and generate “tens of thousands of American jobs.”

“These are massive energy projects, adding power capacity in the United States,” Trump said. “This is new construction, new manufacturing, and great jobs for American workers.”

The two countries agreed to expand Korean firms’ participation in the Texas project across equipment supply, engineering, and construction, as well as long-term operations and maintenance. The U.S. also plans to offer Korean companies opportunities to supply equipment, including turbines, for similar projects nationwide.

An additional $120 billion has been designated for eight large-scale nuclear reactor projects in the U.S. Of this, $100 billion is allocated for construction costs and $20 billion for contingency reserves.

The nuclear agreement was signed by both governments along with Westinghouse Electric, Korea Electric Power Corp., and Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power. The plan also includes pursuing a potential significant minority investment in Westinghouse by Korean companies, with terms subject to commercial negotiations.

Continue Reading

Technologies

SEC Advances Crypto Custody Rules as Major Legislation Languishes in Congress

The SEC has proposed new crypto custody rules for investment advisers and funds while comprehensive legislation remains stalled in Congress, creating a regulatory pathway for digital asset holdings.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has unveiled proposed regulations designed to simplify the process for investment advisers and regulated funds to maintain cryptocurrency holdings for clients, as American regulators move forward with crafting digital asset rules following the stalling of comprehensive legislation on Capitol Hill.

The proposal, revealed Thursday, would create a specialized framework governing how registered investment advisers, investment companies, and business development companies maintain custody of crypto assets.

The modifications aim to update decades-old custody requirements and eliminate regulatory obstacles that the SEC says have restricted advisers’ capacity to provide crypto-related investment options.

Under the proposed regulations, crypto assets could be held in self-custody under “certain circumstances,” while state trust companies could also function as custodians for crypto assets belonging to clients and regulated funds.

The changes could also grant regulated funds expanded authority to offer investors crypto-related investment strategies, according to the SEC.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins stated that existing regulations had not kept pace with the rapid growth of digital assets, which have evolved into a multi-trillion-dollar market.

“Today’s proposal would provide a clear regulatory framework for the custody of crypto assets, giving investment advisers and funds a compliant pathway where none existed before,” Atkins said.

The proposal arrives as U.S. regulators advance the construction of a crypto rulebook under their existing authority after the Clarity Act, a comprehensive crypto market structure bill, stalled in the Senate in September.

This represents another step in the SEC’s broader initiative to reshape the U.S. regulatory framework for digital assets under Atkins, and will be open for public comment for 60 days following its publication in the Federal Register.

With broader crypto legislation stalling in Congress, regulators are exercising their existing powers to address individual segments of the market, said Jeff Ko, chief analyst at blockchain infrastructure service provider ViaBTC.

“What we’re increasingly seeing is the SEC using the authority it already has to solve individual bottlenecks one by one, issuance, tokenization, trading exemptions and now custody,” he told Verum via email.

The changes could also intensify competition among crypto custodians, potentially reducing the cost and complexity of investing in digital assets, he said, adding that institutional custody has historically been concentrated among a relatively small number of providers.

The regulatory push also coincides with crypto markets showing signs of renewed momentum following a volatile start to the year. Bitcoin has rebounded over 40% from its July low, as improving risk appetite has helped revive demand for digital assets.

The recovery follows a prolonged downturn from late 2025 into the first half of 2026.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media