Technologies

Homebuyers Are Scoring 5% Mortgage Rates With These Simple Strategies

You don’t have to settle for high rates in 2025. Here’s how to cut your mortgage rate by 1% or more.

If you’re looking to buy a home, you probably know that housing affordability is in the dumps. Record-high prices and high mortgage rates are serving a double whammy to prospective buyers everywhere.

But mortgage rates aren’t set in stone. Although current rates are hovering near 7%, more borrowers are finding creative ways to snag rates below what lenders advertise. Last year, nearly half of buyers purchased a home at a rate below 5%, according to Zillow.

“With borrowing costs elevated, buyers can take steps to reduce their housing expenses by securing a lower mortgage rate,” said Hannah Jones, senior research analyst at Realtor.com.

The market forces that influence mortgage rates are out of your control. However, if you’re financially prepared and shop around, you can save up to 1.5% on your personalized rate. Optimizing your credit score, making a larger down payment and negotiating with multiple lenders could also help you unlock homeownership in 2025.

Even a 1% difference in your rate can translate to about 10% savings on your monthly mortgage payment and tens of thousands of dollars in savings over the course of your loan.

Here are several ways to reduce your mortgage rate.

1. Improve your credit score

If your credit needs work, consider taking steps to raise your credit score before applying for a mortgage.

Lenders look at your credit score to decide whether you qualify for a home loan and what interest rate you receive. FICO credit scores range from 300 to 850, with 850 being the best score possible. Higher credit scores show you’ve managed debt responsibly in the past so it lowers your risk to a lender. This can help you secure a lower interest rate and save big.

“The best mortgage rates and products are typically reserved for those with a credit score of 740 or better,” said Sarah DeFlorio, vice president of mortgage banking at William Raveis Mortgage.

According to a 2024 Lending Tree study, when borrowers moved from the “fair” credit score range (580 to 669) to the “very good” range (740 to 799), they shaved 0.22% percentage points off their interest rate. That rate difference helped borrowers save $16,677 over the lifetime of a home loan.

2. Increase your down payment

Your down payment is the amount of money you contribute to your home purchase upfront. Each type of home loan comes with a minimum down payment, usually ranging from zero to 5%, but a higher down payment means a cheaper interest rate. That’s because the lender takes on less risk when you contribute more toward the loan.

Because a down payment lowers your mortgage rate and builds your home equity, home loan experts often recommend making a large down payment of at least 20%.

3. Take out an adjustable-rate mortgage

An adjustable-rate mortgage, or ARM, is a home loan with a fixed rate for a set introductory period, such as five years. Once that period ends, the interest rate can go up or down in regular intervals for the remaining term.

The big appeal of ARMs is that the introductory interest rate is often lower than the rate on traditional mortgages. In general, the average 5/1 ARM rate is about 0.5% lower for the first several years than the average rate for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages.

4. Negotiate your mortgage rate

When you’re applying for mortgage loans, you don’t have to go with the company that did your preapproval. In fact, research shows that getting rate quotes from multiple lenders and comparing offers can result in significant savings.

If you want to use this strategy, start by submitting a mortgage application with lenders that fit your criteria. Once you have a few loan estimates in hand, use the best one to negotiate with the lender you want to work with.

The loan officer may lower your rate, help you save on closing costs or offer other incentives to get you onboard. In a 2023 LendingTree survey, 39% of homebuyers negotiated the interest rate on their most recent home purchase. Out of that pool of buyers, 80% were able to get a better deal.

5. Choose a shorter home loan term

Nearly 90% of homebuyers choose a 30-year fixed mortgage term because it offers the most flexibility and monthly payment affordability. Payments are lower because they’re stretched over a longer timeline, but you can always put more toward the principal here and there.

But when you take out a longer-term home loan, “you’re holding up the lender’s money, and there’s an opportunity cost for the funds to be invested elsewhere,” said Nicole Rueth, SVP of the Rueth Team Powered by Movement Mortgage.

Shorter loan terms, such as 10-year and 15-year mortgages and ARMs, have lower interest rates, so you can reduce your rate now.

Choosing a shorter repayment term could help you save money because you’ll be paying less in interest over the long term. But don’t make the homebuying mistake of choosing a shorter loan term just for the lower rate. Shorter loan terms mean you’ll have less time to repay the money you borrow, resulting in higher monthly payments, so it’s important to ensure they fit within your budget.

6. Buy mortgage points

A mortgage point, also known as a mortgage discount point, is an upfront fee you can pay the lender in exchange for a lower interest rate on your home loan.

Each point costs 1% of the purchase price of a home and usually knocks the rate down by 0.25%. On a $400,000 home, you’d pay $4,000 for one discount point. The lender may even allow you to buy four mortgage points to lower the rate from 7% to 6%, although you’d have to shell out $16,000 to get there.

To check whether this strategy is worthwhile, take the total cost of the points and compare it to the overall monthly savings. In this case, when you pay $16,000 to buy four points and save $210 per month, it would take you more than six years to reach your break-even point.

Some experts encourage putting any extra money you have toward a down payment instead of buying points. That’s because if you sell the home or refinance before reaching your break-even point, you lose money. But the amount you spent on your down payment becomes part of your equity.

7. Get a temporary mortgage rate buydown

A temporary mortgage rate buydown involves paying a fee at closing to lower your interest rate for the first few years of your loan term. Because of the considerable upfront cost, this strategy only makes financial sense when someone else pays that fee. Home builders, sellers and even some lenders may offer to cover this type of buydown to boost sales, especially when market rates are elevated.

For example, a lender may offer a “3-2-1” buydown, where the interest rate is slashed by 3 percentage points in the first year, 2 percentage points in the second year and 1 percentage point in the third. Starting in the fourth year, you pay the full rate for the rest of the loan term.

Buyers often choose a temporary buydown and plan to refinance later on. Your buydown funds are refundable and you can use them toward closing costs when you refinance (if rates do drop).

What is a ‘good’ mortgage rate?

The majority of US adults would consider purchasing a home if rates were to drop to 4% or below. Yet most mortgage forecasts don’t project average rates dipping below 6.5% this year.

In a historical sense, a good mortgage rate is generally at or below the national average. Since 1971, the 30-year fixed mortgage rate has averaged 7.72%, according to Freddie Mac. In the last year, average mortgage rates have mostly fluctuated between 6% and 7%.

Affordability is relative to your overall financial situation. And because mortgage rates can change daily and even hourly, the definition of a “good” rate can change quickly.

“What matters is the rate you can get today,” said Colin Robertson, founder of The Truth About Mortgage. According to Robertson, the only way to know if you’re getting a good deal is to speak with a few different lenders and brokers and then compare their quotes against the daily or weekly averages.

Buying a home is a personal decision so it should feel right for your situation and budget. As you shop for a home, consider multiple strategies to lower your rate. A mortgage calculator can help you estimate what you’d pay each month.

Read more: Still Chasing 2% Mortgage Rates? Here’s Why It’s Time to Let Them Go

Technologies

Experts weigh in as researcher says AI has more than 10% chance of ‘killing all humans’

Jacob Coxon said in a post on X that Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives.”

An artificial intelligence researcher quit his job at Anthropic on Tuesday and accused the company, and its chief rival, OpenAI, of acting irresponsibly, igniting a frenzy of concern on social media about the rapid pace of the technology’s development.

Jacob Coxon, who has worked as a researcher at both companies, said in a post on X that he resigned out of concern that Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives.” He said the people building AI “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

“Do not underestimate the power of this technology,” Coxon wrote. “These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”

Coxon’s post, which has been viewed more than 70 million times, reflects a long-standing debate in Silicon Valley about whether AI can be safely developed and controlled. As Anthropic and OpenAI barrel toward potentially historic initial public offerings while releasing increasingly advanced models, many researchers are calling for a coordinated slowdown.

OpenAI’s chief scientist, Jakub Pachocki, published a blog post on Sunday and warned that no AI company has “solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer.” In the AI industry, alignment refers to the work by AI developers to ensure that the system behaves in accordance with human values and intentions.

“I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns to become commonplace until shared safety bars are established,” Pachocki wrote. “And I believe that international coordination on future AI development needs to become a top priority for governments around the world.”

Coxon’s post on Tuesday also struck a chord with industry researchers who are worried about recursive self-improvement, or an AI system becoming capable of designing and developing its successor without human intervention. Recursive self-improvement is not yet possible, but companies, including Anthropic and OpenAI, have warned that it would make it easier for humans to lose control over those systems.

“Neither company is acting responsibly,” Coxon wrote. “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence.”

Evan Hubinger, an alignment lead at Anthropic, echoed Coxon’s comments in a post on X late Tuesday.

“Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade,” Hubinger wrote. “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.”

While extreme, concerns about the potential for AI to cause human extinction or other catastrophic events are not new in AI research circles. In 2023, for instance, prominent AI researchers and executives, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, signed a statement that said “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”

Some experts even use a shorthand, p(doom), to estimate the probability of dire outcomes that could stem from AI.

Anthropic’s Hubinger was also one of roughly 1,400 AI researchers who signed an open letter called “Pacing the Frontier” in July. The letter urged the U.S. government to develop the tools necessary to support an effort to “deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development.”

Some members of Congress have taken steps to try and address AI’s rapid advancement in the months following, but there’s no clear consensus about how the technology should be regulated.

In July, Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., and Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass., introduced a bill called the FRONTIER Act, which aims to establish a framework for governing the deployment of advanced AI models. And earlier this month, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, introduced a bill called the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, which would temporarily pause advanced AI development until the federal government establishes safety rules. Both bills have been met with mixed receptions.

“Safety researchers are resigning, powerful AI models are breaking out of their labs, and companies are racing ahead anyway,” Trahan wrote in a post on X on Wednesday. “It’s past time for Congress to get off the sidelines and do its job.”

Lawmakers are also trying to navigate growing public backlash against AI data centers, the large facilities that house the hardware for training and running AI models. The pushback has grown so intense that the The National Republican Senatorial Committee, or NRSC, said last month that data centers have become a “sleeper issue” for the entire midterm election cycle, as CNBC previously reported.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month that AI companies have done a “horrendous job of explaining themselves to the American people.”

“They’re going to have to take some of the blame, and they are going to have to convince the American people that all the benefits will not accrue to a small group,” Bessent said, following the G20 meetings with finance ministers and central bankers in Asheville, North Carolina. “That’s what they hear from me.”

Technologies

Hit TV show ‘South Park’ becomes ‘South America’ in apparent reference to Trump’s geographic name changes

Show creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone said in a statement that they were “inspired by the bravery and patriotism of Apple and Google.”

Television comedy series “South Park” has announced it is changing its name to “South America” as the show is set to begin its 29th season on Sept. 16.

The show’s creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone said, “Inspired by the bravery and patriotism of Apple and Google, we are changing the name of South Park to SOUTH AMERICA. We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount — a Skydance Capitulation.”

Parker and Stone’s statement comes after U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America amid a trade spat with Canada. Canadian officials said they will not recognize the new name.

Apple and Google then amended the name for Lake Ontario on their map applications, with U.S. users seeing “Lake America,” while Canadian users saw “Lake Ontario.”

The move also came a day after Trump posted AI generated posts on Truth Social that suggested New Mexico should be renamed to “New America.”

Last year, the president used an executive order to change the name for the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, drawing international opposition.

“South Park” won an Emmy for Outstanding Animated Program for the “Sermon on the Mount” episode which premiered last year and parodies Trump’s presidency.

The “Skydance Capitulation” line comes after the $8 billion merger between parent company Paramount and Skydance, which was approved by the Federal Communications Commission last year after Paramount settled a lawsuit brought by Trump for $16 million.

Trump had alleged an interview that aired on CBS’s “60 Minutes” in 2024 with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris, was deceptively edited.

Paramount subsidiary CBS News in July 2025 said it was canceling comedian Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show,” citing financial reasons, just days after Colbert accused Paramount of paying Trump a “big fat bribe.” The final episode of the show aired in May.

Paramount and the White House didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.

Technologies

Trump expresses no remorse over initiating Iran conflict as U.S. intensifies economic sanctions

President Trump expressed no regrets over starting the Iran war, claiming he would act again despite election impacts, while the U.S. increases economic sanctions on Iran.

President Donald Trump stated that he has no regrets regarding the initiation of the Iran war, asserting that he would repeat the same actions if given the chance. In an interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham on Thursday, Trump mentioned that he would have proceeded with the attack on Iran regardless of the consequences for the midterm elections. Ingraham suggested that without the Iran conflict, the midterms would have been a victory, to which Trump responded that if Iran acquired a nuclear weapon, they would use it. Trump further added that a nuclear-armed Iran would eliminate Israel and the Middle East, and begin attacking U.S. cities. These remarks occur as markets anticipate a prolonged Iran war, following a Wall Street Journal report indicating that senior White House advisors explored with Trump the potential for the conflict to extend past his current term. Trump has claimed that the war will conclude right after the midterm elections, leading to a drop in oil and gas prices, reinforcing his repeated assertions that the conflict will end shortly. In distinct comments to NewsNation on Thursday, Trump refuted reports of damage to U.S. assets, after Iran asserted that it struck several U.S. fighter jets at a base in Jordan. When questioned about the reports, Trump said, ‘No damage. No nothing.’ Regarding economic pressure, Washington is persisting in efforts to isolate Iran economically, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announcing sanctions against a major bank scheduled for next week. Bessent stated on ‘Real America’s Voice’ that the sanctions would be implemented on Monday to commemorate the fallen citizens of 9/11, urging to watch for updates. Bessent mentioned that the administration has sanctioned and shut down the Dubai branches of Egypt’s second-largest bank, alleging that it provided Iran with $1.8 billion. He also noted that the 30th-largest Turkish bank, which had been funding Iran, was sanctioned, but did not identify it. Last week, the U.S. imposed sanctions on the Turkey-based Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi Anonim Sirketi, along with its subsidiaries. In the NewsNation interview, Trump was questioned about how Iran could withstand the current economic pressure. Trump responded, ‘I don’t know if they can hold out, but it will be settled after the elections, or perhaps sooner, but definitely right after the election.’ Correction: This article has been revised to accurately reflect Bessent’s statement that the 30th largest Turkish bank was sanctioned; an earlier version incorrectly stated the bank’s ranking.