Technologies

Acer Spin 5 Review: Solid 2-in-1 With an OLED Omission

Competing models only slightly more expensive boast OLED displays. But if that’s not a must-have for you, the Spin 5 is a reliably good, lightweight convertible.

The Acer Spin 5 is a lightweight, all-aluminum, two-in-one laptop with a high-resolution, 14-inch display powered by speedy 12th-gen Intel silicon.

Its plain looks, however, are closer to that of the midrange Lenovo Yoga 7i than premium laptop-tablet hybrids like the Lenovo Yoga 9i, Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro 360 or HP Spectre x360 14. These competing models look sleeker with design flourishes like rounded edges and corners for added comfort and style.

With a price that’s on par with these premium competitors, the Spin 5 begins to lose its appeal. And it has less to do with its staid design and more with a missing feature. While the Spin 5’s 14-inch, 16:10 display is crisp and bright, it’s an ordinary IPS panel rather than an OLED panel that would offer greater contrast and color accuracy.

In 2023, it’s difficult to recommend a $1,350 laptop that lacks an OLED display when OLED models cost only a smidgen more. It’s otherwise a solid commute-friendly two-in-one that even comes with an active pen that stores and charges in the body. You might want to wait for a sale, though.

7.8

Acer Spin 5

$1,350 at Acer

Get Price Alerts

You’re receiving price alerts for Acer Spin 5

Like

Strong overall performance
1080p webcam
Comfortable keyboard
Active pen included

Don’t Like

IPS display can’t compete with OLED
Ordinary appearance
So-so battery life

Acer sells one configuration of the Spin 5 (model SP514-51N-70LZ). It costs $1,350 at Acer and features a 12th-gen Core i7 CPU, 16GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD and a 14-inch, 16:10 display with a 2,560×1,600-pixel resolution. In the UK, the Acer Spin 5 costs 1,400. It’s not currently available in Australia.

You may also see some previous-generation Spin 5 models based on AMD and 11th-gen Intel processors. They’re easy to spot because they feature a 13.5-inch display with a taller 3:2 aspect ratio.

With its Core i7-1260P CPU, 16GB of RAM and integrated Intel Iris Xe graphics, our Spin 5 review system is at or near the top of our benchmarks among a group of similarly priced two-in-ones, with one not insignificant exception. It and the Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro 360 feature a CPU from Intel’s 12th-gen P series, which is more performance-oriented than Intel’s U-series chips found in some of the other models you’ll see in the performance charts. The Spin 5 and Samsung along with the AMD-based HP Envy x360 were the best overall performers. The script flips for the Spin 5, however, with battery life. It lasted 9 hours and 39 minutes on our battery drain test, which was an hour shorter than the next closest system.

Beige and boring but well built

The chief attraction of the Spin 5’s design is its sturdiness. The color of the aluminum is what Acer calls Concrete Gray. It looks as dull as that sounds. And to me, it’s more beige, but the all-metal chassis feels rock solid. There’s no hint of flex when you pick it up by a corner or type thunderously on the keyboard. Even the thin lid protecting the display feels rigid when many thin, aluminum lids flex too much to my liking.

Don’t mistake the Spin 5’s sturdiness for it being clunky or heavy. Weighing only 2.9 pounds, this is an exceedingly portable 14-inch system. The chassis is compact, with thin bezels framing the 16:10 display. Despite the trim chassis, the keyboard feels roomy; the only small-ish keys are the half-height up- and down-arrow keys. The keys offer snappy feedback with shallow travel and allow for speedy and near-silent typing. There’s two-level keyboard backlighting, and the power button doubles as a fingerprint reader that you can use with Windows Hello to log in without needing to bother with entering a password.

The touchpad is a bit undersized but wholly functional with responsive and accurate feedback. You can also navigate Windows via the touch display, which can be tapped and swiped on using your fingertip or the included active stylus. The pen can be garaged in the right edge of the laptop when it’s not needed.

Most 14-inch laptops feature a full-HD resolution, but the Spin 5 bumps it up to a 2.5K resolution(2,560×1,600 pixels) for an incredibly sharp picture. The 16:10 aspect ratio makes a huge difference on a 14-inch panel because, at this size, a widescreen 16:9 panel can feel cramped from top to bottom. It’s less of an issue on larger laptops, but at 14 inches and smaller, a 16:10 panel feels so much roomier vertically. You can see more lines on the screen in long documents and web pages and don’t need to scroll as frequently.

The Spin 5’s screen is rated for 425 nits of brightness, and I measured it even a bit brighter than that at around 450 nits. The display was bright enough to see clearly in my sunny breakfast nook, and I didn’t even need to max out the brightness slider.

OLED > IPS

So, the display is crisp and bright and yet I found it ultimately disappointing because an OLED panel becomes an option right around the Spin 5’s price. For roughly $1,500, you can get an OLED panel on the Lenovo Yoga 9i, HP Spectre x360 14 and Samsung Galaxy Book 2 Pro 360. And once you’ve used an OLED laptop and experienced the incredible contrast with absolute black levels and vibrant color, it’s hard to go back to an IPS panel unless you are shopping under $1,000.

OLED panels trickling down from high-end, high-priced laptops for content creators to midrange models is one of the best laptop trends of the past year. The other? The move from grainy 720p webcams to 1080p cameras. The Spin 5 may have missed out on the OLED trend, but it hopped on the 1080p webcam trend.

You will appear in fine, accurate detail to your video conference mates when seated in front of the Spin 5. The webcam isn’t an IR camera, however, so you can’t use facial recognition with Windows Hello. The camera also lacks a physical privacy cover, and there’s no kill switch on the keyboard to guarantee privacy when the camera isn’t being used.

The Spin 5 offers a useful selection of ports. There are a pair of USB-C ports with Thunderbolt 4 support and a pair of USB Type-A ports so you need to hassle with an adapter for your USB devices. The USB-A ports are split with one on each side of the system, but the USB-C ports are both located on the left side. I wish the USB-C ports were also split across each side because you need to use one of them to charge the laptop, and I would have liked the flexibility to connect the power cord to either side of the laptop depending where the nearest power outlet is located. The Spin 5 also supplies an HDMI port as well as a microSD card slot — a rare inclusion.

As currently configured and priced, the Acer Spin 5 is an awkward proposition. There’s no fatal flaw to this 14-inch two-in-one, but it’s priced right about where OLED models start to become an option. The Spin 5 makes sense if you can find it on sale for closer to $1,000, but a better option is waiting for an OLED two-in-one to go on sale for around what the Spin 5 costs right now.

Technologies

Which 2025 iPhone Has the Best Battery? I’ve Crowned a New Power Winner

I looked at three years of exclusive CNET data of iPhone performance to find out which models hold their charges best.

Key takeaways:

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has outstanding battery life that easily lasts all day with charge to spare.
Our exclusive lab data shows you don’t need to pay over a grand for excellent battery life. The $829 iPhone 17’s battery lasts just as long as the $1,099 iPhone 17 Pro.
The ultrathin iPhone Air, with a modest battery capacity, outlasted Samsung’s premium Galaxy S25 phones.

You might say that battery life is just a small consideration when buying a new iPhone or Android phone now, but that stance gets shaky when you’re staring down a sliver of red in the battery gauge and have nowhere to plug in. After reviewing smartphones for over a decade, I’ve learned that longer battery life is the one feature people consistently want from their phones.

When Apple launched the new iPhone 17 series and iPhone Air, it spent considerable time touting the longer battery life of the iPhone 17, 17 Pro, and 17 Pro Max, as compared to their predecessors.

My fellow CNET reviewers and I have now had the chance to test those claims.

When introducing the iPhone Air and its super slim design, Apple showed a slide during its keynote stating that it has all-day battery life. However, the company undercut its claim on the next slide when it announced a new MagSafe battery pack designed for the Air, which fed into fears that a thinner design might indicate a significant sacrifice to battery life.

Your phone’s battery life is affected by multiple variables, like how bright you keep your display or if your phone has a weak signal from your carrier. How you use your phone has a big impact, too. Someone who is obsessively online will have a much different experience with their battery life than someone who has their phone in their bag at work and checks it on breaks.

So, how do you know whether the battery life is good on the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 series?

CNET tested the new Apple phones’ battery life three ways: through an anecdotal stress test, a video streaming test and observing battery life after everyday use. We also tested wired and wireless charging. Our lab data showed strong battery life for the iPhone 17, 17 Pro, 17 Pro Max and even the Air, especially compared to older iPhone models.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has excellent battery life

Bigger batteries don’t always mean superior battery life. There’s more to battery life than the physical size or capacity. Besides Huawei, Apple is the only major smartphone maker that builds its own hardware and software and can tune its phones to work off smaller batteries than most Android phones have.

The iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max have larger batteries than last year’s 16 Pro and 16 Pro Max. If you’re using an eSIM-only version of either phone, like the iPhone models sold in the US, your battery is even bigger because it takes up the space where the SIM card tray would be.

Frustratingly, Apple doesn’t share the capacity of the iPhone’s batteries, and part of the reason is that its batteries are often smaller than those in Android phones. Fortunately, the EU requires that Apple publish energy labels that include the capacity of its batteries on its site. Macrumors found the capacities for eSIM-only models. You can see how the new phones’ batteries compare to the ones in the iPhone 16 series:

iPhone Air: 3,149 mAh
iPhone 17: 3,692 mAh
iPhone 17 Pro: 4,252 mAh
iPhone 17 Pro Max: 5,088 mAh
iPhone 16: 3,561 mAh
iPhone 16 Plus: 4,674 mAh
iPhone 16 Pro: 3,582 mAh
iPhone 16 Pro Max: 4,685 mAh

CNET has two benchmark tests (video streaming and stress tests) that allow us to compare the battery performance of one phone against another. And because we’ve been using these tests for years, we can also compare a new phone against older models.

For example, if you have an iPhone 15 and are considering upgrading to an iPhone 17, we can tell you that the new iPhone will have a longer battery life out of the box than your old one.

In CNET’s 3-hour video battery test, where we streamed a video over Wi-Fi with the screen at full brightness, the iPhone 17 series did terrific, even if the results were not dramatically better than the iPhone 16 series.

Without a Plus model this year, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the only model with a big battery (the biggest one ever in an iPhone), and it only lost 9% in the test. The lower the percentage lost, the better. This is the first time an iPhone stayed in single digits, and I should note that the 17 Pro Max tied the Motorola Razr (2024) for the best score since we’ve been running the test. The Razr has a less powerful processor and a smaller main screen with a lower resolution and less brightness.

The iPhone Air and 17 Pro dropped 15% in the test, the same as the iPhone 15. And the iPhone 17 lost only 11%, better than the iPhone 15 and 16.

Something to keep in mind is that the iPhone 17 has a 6.3-inch screen that supports a 1-120Hz variable refresh rate and a max brightness of 3,000 nits, compared to the iPhone 15 and 16, which have a 6.1-inch display with a 60Hz refresh rate and a max brightness of 2,000 nits.

The new Apple phones did well in CNET’s 45-minute endurance test, during which I played games, streamed videos, scrolled social media and took a video call. The 17 Pro Max only dropped a single percent, the best result this year, but behind the iPhone 16 Plus, which stayed at 100% (the best result for any phone).

The iPhone 17 and 17 Pro had the same result, dropping 2%, making the standard iPhone 17 look even more like an incredible value. The iPhone Air dropped 5%, which matches the iPhone 15 in the same test. For perspective, the Air did better in this test than the Samsung Galaxy S25 series and tied with the Motorola Razr Ultra.

The iPhone Air gets through a day

When we review phones, we set them up as our daily driver to use and test them like our personal phones. Real-world testing is often the best indicator of what a reader can expect to get from a phone.

I started each day with a full battery for the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max and tracked how much battery I had throughout the day. I ended each day with plenty of battery left — even after shooting photos and videos or keeping the screen at full brightness while filming the review video. Below is a chart that shows how the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s battery performed for the first five days I had it.

Similarly, CNET senior technology reporter Abrar Al-Heeti highlights that the iPhone Air she reviewed regularly ends the day with about 20% to spare (after starting with a full battery). She said it would drop below 20% on heavier-use days by the time she was ready for bed.

«Impressively, the iPhone Air has consistently lasted all day over the last several weeks I’ve been using it,» Al-Heeti said. «But I’ve hardly had to touch that MagSafe battery pack to extend battery life during the day, which is reassuring.»

In our testing, a fully-charged MagSafe battery added 69% to the iPhone Air’s battery. When I asked her whether she’d recommend people buy the $99 MagSafe Battery for the Air, Al-Heeti said that she recommends it for someone who uses their phone often and doesn’t want to hunt for an outlet.

«I don’t like the idea of having to lug around an extra battery, no matter how thin or sleek it is, so I don’t tend to carry it with me unless I know I’m going to have a long day away from home,» Al-Heeti said.

She also reviewed the standard iPhone 17 and said it can easily last a little over a day, even after snapping photos, scrolling through social media, listening to audiobooks and music, texting and watching videos.

Al-Heeti’s review notes that over several days, she’d start with a full battery, between 8:30 and 9:30 a.m., and have 44% to 47% of a charge 12 hours later. If she didn’t recharge the iPhone 17 overnight, she’d still have about 30% to spare the next morning.

The iPhone 17 series charges fast

There are two ways to charge an iPhone: with a cable or with MagSafe (unless it’s the iPhone 16E, which doesn’t have MagSafe, just Qi charging). For wired charging, Apple recommends using a 40W charger with the iPhone 17, 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max and a 20W charger for the iPhone Air. However, Apple doesn’t include a charger in the box, just a USB-C cable, but the company does sell a 40W charger for $39 and a 20W charger for $19.

In our 30-minute wired charging test, the new phones, including the Air, did well. The iPhone 17, 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max added 10% or more than the iPhone 16, 16 Pro and 16 Pro Max in the same test. Apple says the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max can recharge to 50% in 20 minutes. In our tests, the iPhone 17 Pro hit 53% and the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 49% after 20 minutes.

The iPhone Air reached 49% in our 30-minute charging test with a 20W adapter, the same as the iPhone 16 and iPhone 15 Pro, beating the iPhone 15 Plus.

In wireless charging or MagSafe charging, we ran a 30-minute test with the latest MagSafe charger and a 30W power adapter. The iPhone 17 series and Air beat every iPhone we’ve ever tested except the iPhone 16 Pro, which did better than the Air and standard iPhone 17. I should note that iPhones don’t come with a MagSafe charger or 30W adapter in the box.

Which iPhone should you buy based on CNET Labs data?

Get the iPhone 17 Pro Max if you want the best battery life. The standard iPhone 17 has great battery life and inches out the more expensive iPhone 17 Pro. And if you’re on Team Air, know that the battery life isn’t great, but depending on how hard you use it, you should get through a day on a single charge.

I should also note that iOS 26 has a new Adaptive Power mode. This feature learns your phone’s use patterns and «adapts» how much power the processor uses for specific tasks, so it draws less from the battery. The new feature takes a week to start working. I turned it on after running CNET’s battery tests and will update this story with any changes or improvements that come from it.

Last, if you have an iPhone and the only issue is that its battery doesn’t charge as much as it used to, think about replacing it with a new one. Doing so will not only be hundreds of dollars cheaper than a new iPhone, but it can extend your phone’s life another couple of years.

Technologies

Apple Says a Digital Version of Your Passport Is Coming Soon to iPhones

The feature will be REAL ID compliant, but you still need a physical passport to leave the country.

Apple will soon allow iPhone owners to add digital versions of their US passports to their phones, said Jennifer Bailey, vice president for Apple Pay and Wallet, on Sunday.

The digital document will be compliant with REAL ID, but you’ll still need a physical US passport to fly internationally or cross US land borders with Canada and Mexico.

Apple wants to broaden how people can use its online Wallet feature for identification purposes. You can already use a digital ID for your driver’s license in certain states, and Bailey said Apple wants people to use Wallet for concert tickets, student IDs, house keys, car keys and more.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

Not for international travel

When the feature becomes available, iPhone users can scan their physical US passport to add it to the Wallet app, creating a digital ID that’s compliant with REAL ID. When flying domestically, travelers can show that digital version from their iPhone or Apple Watch, instead of using their physical passport, at participating TSA checkpoints. REAL ID is required to fly within the US and to US territories such as Puerto Rico.

However, travelers will not be able to use their digital ID to fly internationally, not even to Mexico or Canada. When crossing borders, you’ll still need your physical US passport to enter and leave the country.

Convenience … and risk

While relying on Apple Wallet might be convenient, there are risks, according to the Identity Management Institute, a global identity and access management organization. Possible dangers of digital ID wallets include security breaches, identity theft and data privacy issues. Losing your device is another major risk.

The organization said that people using digital ID wallets must take several precautions, which are good tips for any online activity.

Use strong, unique passwords or PINs.
Enable two-factor authentication.
Keep devices and software up to date.
Be cautious about where you’re making digital transactions. Verify that you’re shopping or otherwise using your digital ID at legitimate sites.

Technologies

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Tuesday, Oct. 28

Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for Oct. 28.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.

Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? I found 6-Across kind of tricky, as it could be so many different words. Read on for the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.