Technologies
Tesla sued by California agency alleging racial discrimination
The state’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing says the carmaker’s Fremont factory is a racially segregated workplace and Black workers are subjected to racial slurs.
A California agency tasked with enforcing the state’s civil rights laws has reportedly filed a lawsuit against Tesla, alleging racial discrimination and harassment occurred at the electric carmaker.
The California Department of Fair Employment and Housing said it filed the complaint Wednesday in Alameda County Superior Court.
“After receiving hundreds of complaints from workers, DFEH found evidence that Tesla’s Fremont factory is a racially segregated workplace where Black workers are subjected to racial slurs and discriminated against in job assignments, discipline, pay, and promotion creating a hostile work environment,” Kevin Kish, the agency’s director, said in a statement to The Wall Street Journal.
Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment but criticized the agency’s investigation in a blog post Wednesday.
“Tesla strongly opposes all forms of discrimination and harassment and has a dedicated Employee Relations team that responds to and investigates all complaints,” Tesla said in the post.
Tesla called the legal action “unfair and counterproductive” and pointed out that it’s the “last remaining automobile manufacturer in California” and that the workforce at its Fremont factory is predominantly minority.
The ageny’s lawsuit comes a day after a Black gay woman who formerly worked at another Tesla factory in California filed a lawsuit against the company ignored the racial and homophobic slurs and physical harm she endure. Kaylen Barker, who worked at Tesla’s Lathrop plant, alleged that she was struck with a grinding tool by a white co-worker who was calling her the n-word, according to the lawsuit, filed Tuesday in Alameda County.
The white employee was fired but then rehired two weeks later “without any forewarning or explanation,” she said in her complaint.Tesla didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on that case either.
Tesla founder and CEO Elon Musk announced plans in October to relocate the company’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas, but also said it would continue to expand its activities in California.
That same month, Tesla was ordered to pay nearly $137 million in damages in a lawsuit that alleged a Black former employee was subjected to racist abuse, discrimination and harassment at the company’s Fremont facility.
Silicon Valley has been a frequent target of the DFEH’s scrutiny in recent years. In a lawsuit last July, the agency accused gaming giant Activision Blizzard of discriminating against women and fomenting a toxic work culture. Microsoft, which announced in January it would purchase the game-maker for nearly $69 billion in cash, has pledged to change Activision’s culture.
A month earlier, games developer Riot Games agreed to pay more than $100 million to settle a 2018 gender discrimination and sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the agency.
The Department of Fair Employment and Housing didn’t respond to a request for comment.
Technologies
Verum Exchange Launches a $10 Bonus for Online Mining of Verum Coin and Bitcoin
Verum Exchange Launches a $10 Bonus for Online Mining of Verum Coin and Bitcoin
Verum Exchange is expanding its online mining capabilities, allowing users to earn a $10 bonus while continuing to mine cryptocurrency directly from their smartphones. The feature is available not only in the currency converter app but also within Verum Messenger.
Online mining has long been part of the Verum ecosystem. Now, the company has added a new incentive to the existing feature â a bonus for participating in online mining.
The concept of online mining is changing the traditional perception of cryptocurrency mining. Users do not need to set up specialized mining equipment at home or deal with complex technical configurations. The feature can be accessed directly through the Verum digital ecosystem.
Verum Exchange: https://exchange.verum.im
Verum Messenger: https://ios.verum.im
Technologies
Supreme Court permits certain Trump mail-in voting restrictions before midterm elections
The Supreme Court has temporarily blocked a lower court ruling that prevented the Trump administration from implementing new restrictions on mail-in voting, allowing the administration to proceed with its plan to impose new requirements on states ahead of the midterm elections.
The Supreme Court on Monday sided with President Donald Trump for now in his effort to impose sweeping new restrictions on distributing mail ballots, putting on hold a lower-court ruling that had blocked key parts of the plan ahead of Novemberâs midterm elections.
The justices, over three dissents, paused a ruling by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston that prevented the Trump administration from carrying out portions of a March executive order involving the U.S. Postal Service and voter eligibility lists. The courtâs three liberal justices dissented.
But the decision does not immediately allow the Postal Service to put its new mail-ballot system into effect.
A separate nationwide injunction issued Aug. 11 by U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani in Boston still blocks USPS from implementing the new procedures for the Nov. 3 elections. The administration would have to overcome that order as well.
The distinction was central to the Supreme Courtâs decision.
The majority said Trumpâs executive order itself does not require states to change how they conduct elections. Instead, it directs federal agencies to develop policies that could later impose requirements on states. Because those policies had not yet been implemented when 23 states and Washington, D.C., challenged the order, the court said the challenge was premature.
The justices stressed they were not deciding whether Trumpâs order or the policies developed under it are ultimately legal.
âThe Courtâs disposition of this application does not mean that any measure taken by the Government to implement the Order will necessarily be lawful,â the majority wrote. âOn that score, time will tell.â
The Postal Service last week finalized rules intended to carry out part of Trumpâs order, including new requirements involving ballot envelopes, barcodes and information states must provide USPS. Those rules remain blocked by Talwaniâs separate injunction.
The case now returns to the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as the underlying legal fight continues. Some states have already started preparing to send ballots to military and overseas voters in early September.
Technologies
Trump targets Iranâs trade lifelines â here are the countries most exposed
Washington’s threat of “economic D-Day” collides with a small group of governments that account for most of what remains of Iran’s foreign trade.
The U.S. announced an âeconomic D-Dayâ campaign Monday to isolate Iran from the global economy, threatening penalties against âenablersâ that continue doing business with Tehran.
The move is part of Washingtonâs bid to sever the trade lifeline that has sustained Tehranâs economy through nearly six months of war.
While enforcement details are sketchy, the threat could still put the U.S. on a collision course with some of Tehranâs major trade partners.
China
China is the biggest buyer of Iranian oil and serves as a crucial link to the global economy for Tehran, accounting for about 90% of its oil exports, according to the U.S. government.
China reported $9.96 billion in bilateral trade with Iran in 2025, excluding the roughly $31.2 billion in unreported Iranian crude oil exports to China that year, according to the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
Independent Chinese refiners take in the bulk of it, often rebranded as Malaysian or Indonesian crude and settled through intermediaries outside the dollar system, according to Kpler. The U.S. Treasury has sanctioned several of those refineries this year for Iranian oil purchases, while sparing Chinese financial institutions.
Beijing has openly opposed U.S. sanctions against Iran, arguing that economic pressure will not resolve the disputes. In May, China ordered domestic firms to disregard U.S. sanctions on five refiners linked to the Iranian oil trade.
While Beijing is unlikely to push back directly on Washingtonâs sanctions push, it will âquietly step up complianceâ among state banks and oil companies to avoid getting caught in the net, said Dan Wang, China director at Eurasia Group, pointing to âa dichotomy between the official statement and the private practice.â
âChinese authorities care more about dollar access in financing and market entry to the U.S.,â she said.
United Arab Emirates
The Emirates, located just 50 miles from Iran across the Persian Gulf, has long been a major trading hub for Iran.
The bilateral trade amounted to around $28 billion in 2024, when the Emirates was its largest source of imports, contributing over 30%, according to the World Trade Organization data. The UAE was also Iranâs third-largest export destination, making up 12% of its shipments, totaling more than $7 billion.
That relationship hit a snag last week as the UAE moved to suspend all trade and financial transactions with Iran, following two ballistic missiles fired toward Emirati territory, one of which targeted UAE-owned tankers.
Iran has relied on UAE banks and its financial system to access the world economy through illicit, often murky transactions, and cutting off Iran would require more forceful actions from Emirati authorities to crack down on opaque financial and trading activity, according to U.S.-based think tank The Washington Institute.
âThe majority of Iranâs transshipment, smuggling, and shadow banking activity takes place in Dubai, so Washington must do what it can to help the UAEâs national leaders in Abu Dhabi convince and cajole Dubaiâs leaders to play ball,â Matthew Levitt, a former U.S. Treasury official, wrote in a note on Monday.
Turkey
Turkey maintains significant commercial ties with Tehran, importing Iranian natural gas and exporting manufactured goods south.
The Turkey-Iran bilateral trade reached $5.7 billion in 2024, according to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, with Ankara exporting mostly machinery and parts, chemical and agricultural products, while importing energy products from Tehran.
Meanwhile, under a 25-year gas supply contract between the two countries that expired at the end of July, Turkeyâs imports of Iranian gas spiked this year while Iranâs share of Turkeyâs total natural gas imports rose to 18.6%, according to local media.
While Ankara has sought to diversify toward other suppliers, expanding pipeline imports from Azerbaijan and Russia, it has, so far, not signaled that it intends to cut Iran off.
Iraq
Iraq, dependent on Iranian electricity and gas, has historically traded billions with Tehran.
Iran renewed a five-year contract in March 2024 to supply Iraq with up to nearly 660 billion cubic feet of natural gas a year, and electricity imports from Iran accounted for more than 30% of its electricity generation in 2023, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.
Iraq-Iran trade reached more than $10 billion in 2025, according to Reuters, with Tehran exporting food, consumer goods and other products to the Iraqi market. The trade has dwindled this year amid increased security risks in the region and intermittent disruptions along border crossings since the war started in late February.
Iraq reportedly pays Iran around $4 billion to $5 billion a year for natural gas for electricity generation. The fresh U.S. sanctions could curtail Baghdadâs payments for Iranian energy.
India
India, among Iranâs top five trading partners, has seen its bilateral trade with Iran fall in recent years to around $1.6 billion in the year ending March 2026, according to Indiaâs Department of Commerce, down from $2.3 billion in the year through to March 2023.
New Delhi primarily exports rice, tea, sugar and pharmaceuticals to Iran, and imports dry and fresh fruits from Iran.
In April, India resumed importing crude oil from Iran following a seven-year halt, after the U.S. temporarily lifted sanctions on Iranian crude exports.
But those trades now will be tested if Washington makes good on its threat to sanction any entity, including Indian refiners, that have procured Iranian energy.
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies3 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of ĐĄrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
