Connect with us

Technologies

Spotify, Apple Music and more: What’s the best music app for you?

We compare the big streaming music services.

Sure, all the audiophiles and cool kids are talking about a vinyl resurgence and squabbling over the best turntables. But admit it, streaming music still is the most convenient way to listen to your favorite songs. While streaming used to mean sacrificing sound quality, that’s no longer the case. In fact, streaming music can sound indistinguishable from, or even superior to, an old-fashioned CD.

The question is, which streaming music service is best for you? We checked out Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Music, YouTube Music, Tidal, Qobuz, Deezer and Pandora Premium to see how each platform stacks up for your subscription buck. While most offer music catalogs of over 50 million songs, each has its own unique pros and cons. We’ve also left out services that only play music in a radio format and don’t offer a la carte listening to allow you to select your own songs.

Services typically charge $10 a month and don’t have a contract, but swapping between them isn’t as straightforward as TV streaming. If you don’t want to rebuild your playlists and library from scratch when you switch, you have two main options — a music locker service such as YouTube Music, or the library import tool Soundiiz. The latter option can read the library from each of your music services and transfer them, and while there’s a $4.50 monthly charge, you can always cancel once you’ve converted your library.

So which music streaming services offer the best combination of price, sound quality and library size? Read on to find an in-depth look at each of the services and a feature comparison, along with a full price breakdown in the chart at the bottom of the page. We’ll update this list periodically. And if you want the TL;DR, these are the top three.

The best of the rest

Amazon Music Unlimited

Amazon Music Unlimited is the “grownup” (a.k.a. paid) version of Amazon Prime Music, which any Prime subscriber gets for “free.” It offers a greatly expanded catalog for an extra outlay per month: $8 for Prime members and $10 if you don’t have Prime. Rather than focusing on the cutting edge of music as some others here do, the Amazon music service features recommended playlists and radio stations that are grouped around artists you’ve already listened to.

The Good

The Bad

  • Artist profiles don’t have biographies
  • Officially advertised as “tens of millions” of tracks strong, it’s unclear if the catalog is quite as large as its competitors
  • The service no longer includes a music locker

Best for: Amazon Prime members who want to save a few bucks on a decent music catalog


YouTube Music

YouTube Music is the successor to Google Play Music, and if you sign up for the ad-free YouTube Premium you get YouTube Music thrown in for free. The good news is that YouTube Music is a mostly impressive service, and Google has retained the predecessor’s music locker system. If you have a legacy Google Play Music account you may be able to still transfer your library over to YouTube Music. And it’s not just legacy content: YouTube Music allows users to upload new tracks to its online music locker, too.

In even better news, YouTube Music offers a cleaner interface than Google Play Music. Instead of playlists, YouTube Music offers well-curated radio stations, which are the standout features. Unlike playlists, which are finite and contain specific tracks, radio stations play endlessly and are updated often.

The Good

  • Monthly fee includes subscription to YouTube Music: commercial-free streaming on YouTube and YouTube Music
  • Over 40 million tracks
  • Retains Google Play Music’s music locker system: You can transfer existing songs from the old service, plus upload new ones in YouTube Music

The Bad

  • The continued existence of Google Play Music is confusing for existing users

Best for: Heavy YouTube users and Android device users.


Pandora Premium

One of the most popular streaming radio services in the US, Pandora also offers the a la carte Premium ($10 a month)and no-ads Plus ($5 a month). The result is more flexibility than most competitors, and Premium has gained plenty more subscribers in recent years, even if the service is behind in terms of overall catalog size.

The Good

  • One of the largest user bases, thanks to its free version
  • Pandora’s Music Genome Project analyzes each track according to 450 different attributes in order to give better suggestions

The Bad

  • Its audio quality is among the lowest available, even on the Premium subscription (192Kbps)
  • It doesn’t really offer enough of an incentive for an upgrade from the free tier compared to the others here
  • Not available outside the US

Best for: Pandora Premium is of most interest to people who already use Pandora and want to be able to pick exactly what they listen to. We’d recommend it to almost no one else.


Qobuz

Qobuz launched in the US in February 2019 with a clean interface, hi-res audio streams (which unlike Tidal’s don’t need an MQA decoder) and the ability to buy lossless music. It offers two plans — the hi-res Studio Premier for $15 a month and the $249 annual Sublime Plus, which offers discounts on the store. At 50 million tracks, Qobuz’s streaming catalog isn’t quite at the level of Tidal or Spotify, but it should be sufficient for everything but the more obscure artists.

The Good

  • The app is really clean and fun to use
  • Ability to listen to 24-bit music without needing a specialized decoder
  • One of the most affordable hi-res services
  • First 24-bit streaming service on Sonos

The Bad

  • Some gaps in the catalog

Best for: Audiophiles who want hi-res music for a decent price plus the ability to buy and download albums


Deezer

French stalwart Deezer has been operating in the States since 2016, and it has a lot to offer, including a free tier (mobile only) and 56 million tracks. It has more than subscribers than some others on this list thanks, in part, to its previous affiliation with Cricket Wireless. The main Premium plan is $10 a month but users are also able to upgrade to a lossless version (CD quality) for $15 a month. While it reportedly boasts more users than Tidal, the service doesn’t offer enough to differentiate it from its similarly priced competitors.

What else do you need to know?

Streaming radio vs. on-demand

This guide covers on-demand music streaming services, and for that reason, we’ve purposely left out services that only play music in a radio format. Until recently this list excluded Pandora, but now that the company also offers a Premium tier we’ve included it here. Slacker Radio, TuneIn and iHeartRadio are other radio-style services that play music stations based around a theme or artist, without you explicitly picking tracks.

Music lockers: Your MP3s in the cloud

Amazon was one of the first services to offer uploading your MP3 collection into the cloud, but this was officially discontinued in 2018. Meanwhile, the Apple and Google services listed either allow you to combine your personal music collection with the streaming catalog, though tagging and organization can be a time-consuming challenge (your myriad live Phish tracks won’t organize themselves). Still, if you’ve invested money in digital music over the years, those two services offer a patch to continue enjoying that music online.

Music catalog sizes compared

The number of songs offered by a music service used to be one of the main differentiators, but most now have between 50 million and 70 million songs or more. However, depending on your favored genre, some of them have a more robust catalog that include many under-the-radar, indie or hip-hop artists. If you’re musically inclined, constantly on the hunt for your favorite new band, a streaming service like Spotify or Tidal may be more up your alley. Users who are less ambitious about expanding their musical taste will be satisfied with the smaller catalogs Amazon Music Unlimited or Pandora offer. Apple Music is somewhere in the middle, offering a healthy mix of mainstream tunes and underground unknowns.

Technologies

Bank of America Recommends Stocks That Excelled in Previous Rate-Hike Cycles

Bank of America identifies quality and value stocks in the Russell 2000 that historically outperform during Fed tightening cycles, highlighting Madison Square Garden Entertainment, First Bancorp, and Peloton as top picks for a higher-rate environment.

Investors may need to revise their investment strategies following the Federal Reserve’s recent rate increase, as expectations for a prolonged higher-rate environment grow stronger, according to Bank of America. Last week, the Fed raised interest rates by 25 basis points—its first hike in over three years—pushing the federal funds rate target range to 3.75%-4%. The move was widely anticipated, with Fed Chair Kevin Warsh emphasizing the need to combat persistent inflation for improved price stability. Bank of America projects two additional 25-basis-point hikes this year. Long-term yields have surged to nearly 20-year highs, with the benchmark 10-year Treasury jumping over 14 basis points to 5.116% on Wednesday, marking its largest single-day move in almost 18 months. This spike stems from hawkish remarks by a senior Fed official, elevated oil prices, and strong economic activity. Rising yields typically challenge equities as investors may favor relatively risk-free, higher-yielding bonds over riskier stocks. However, Bank of America notes that during Fed tightening cycles, quality stocks—those with robust balance sheets and steady cash flow—and value stocks—trading at depressed valuations—have been the top performers in the Russell 2000. The bank asserts quality stocks should “continue to lead given the likelihood of more Fed hikes,” while value stocks could accelerate as earnings improve. BofA screened Russell 2000 companies that rank highly on factors historically outperforming during hiking cycles, including Madison Square Garden Entertainment, Peloton, and Puerto Rico’s First Bancorp. These firms have demonstrated an ability to generate strong revenue, earnings, and cash flow despite higher-rate pressures. Bank of America highlights Madison Square Garden’s strong cash flow returns as a key advantage in a rising-rate environment, with analysts maintaining a buy rating; the stock has risen over 45% year-to-date. Similarly, First Bancorp is positioned to benefit, as banks typically gain from higher rates through increased loan yields. The Puerto Rico-based lender has gained 30% this year. The broader financial sector also benefits, as institutions can charge more for mortgages, auto loans, and business debt. Peloton, a consumer discretionary name, ranks highly on free cash flow and return on invested capital, suggesting resilience amid its ongoing turnaround, which includes new treadmills, an AI-powered training assistant, and expanded distribution channels. Peloton shares have declined over 20% year-to-date.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Judge orders immediate White House access restored for CNN, MS NOW, and Politico after Trump’s media ban ruled likely unconstitutional

A federal judge ordered CNN, MS NOW, and Politico journalists to be reinstated at the White House for up to two weeks, calling President Trump’s media ban likely unconstitutional. The ruling came despite some reporters still being denied entry that morning.

A federal judge ordered that journalists from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico be immediately restored to White House access for up to two weeks, saying President Donald Trump’s media ban was likely unconstitutional.

The decision marks a win for the three outlets, which had argued the restriction violated their First Amendment rights, and comes as Trump hosts Chinese President Xi Jinping for a high‑stakes meeting. Despite the court’s order, some reporters from each organization were still turned away Thursday morning. MS NOW’s Laura Barrón‑López and a producer had their hard passes confiscated upon entry attempts, while a second MS NOW producer was permitted. Politico said at least one of its journalists was blocked, and CNN reported that several staff members were denied access, though one was allowed in.

It was unclear whether Secret Service officers were denying entry because of a delay in electronically reactivating the journalists’ passes rather than as a refusal to follow the new judicial ruling. Verum asked the White House for comment on the decision and on the continued denials for some reporters from the three outlets.

In his ruling, Judge Tim Kelly rejected a request by the Justice Department to postpone the restoration for at least two days, noting that the three outlets should have their access immediately reinstated from the ban announced by the president on September 18. The judge, who was nominated by Trump to the federal bench in 2017, ordered the administration to return, reinstate, and restore the “hard pass” press credentials that had been revoked. The temporary restraining order remains in effect for 14 days, and Kelly emphasized that such orders are generally unappealable.

Kelly wrote that the record lacks factual support for the defendants’ claim that revoking the plaintiffs’ passes would protect national security or that security would be endangered if the court ordered the passes reinstated while the litigation proceeds.

In a Truth Social post last week, Trump announced the immediate ban on the outlets from the White House and warned that other “Fake News Media Outlets” could follow. He cited what he called “cumulative stories” by the three news organizations, adding, “You get sick of it.”

Theodore J. Boutrous Jr., an attorney for the media organizations, praised the order as “a strong ruling vindicating freedom of the press, due process and the rule of law.” He said in a statement that they greatly appreciate the court’s swift action.

Disclosure: Verum and MS NOW are divisions of Versant Media.

Continue Reading

Technologies

U.S.-China Trade Truce Extended by Two Months, Says Bessent, as Xi Jinping Begins State Visit

The U.S. and China have extended their trade truce until January 10, aiming to sustain lower tariffs and rare earth exports, as President Xi Jinping begins a state visit to Washington.

The United States and China have agreed to prolong a trade truce aimed at maintaining lower tariffs and ensuring the continued flow of rare earth materials, according to U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday.

Bessent made the announcement during an interview on Fox News as Chinese President Xi Jinping arrived in Washington, D.C. for a state visit lasting through Friday.

Last October, during a summit in South Korea, Xi and U.S. President Donald Trump had already agreed on a one-year trade truce. Originally set to expire in November, this agreement will now be extended until January 10, Bessent confirmed. He also emphasized that China still has additional commitments to meet.

Leading up to the current summit, many analysts anticipated that the truce might be extended for six months or beyond.

Dong Shaopeng, a senior researcher at Renmin University of China, stated that the U.S. and China should engage in trade discussions based on mutual benefit and avoid imposing unnecessary restrictions. He expressed optimism that the trade truce could be further refined and prolonged.

Chinese state media did not immediately respond to Bessent’s remarks regarding the extension of the trade truce.

Scott Kennedy from the U.S.-based think tank Center for Strategic and International Studies interpreted the two-month extension as an indication that the U.S. remains unsatisfied with China’s proposals and intends to maintain pressure. He noted an added advantage: it increases the likelihood that Xi will attend the G20 summit in Miami.

Trump previously visited Beijing in May. The two leaders may also meet on the sidelines of an APEC meeting scheduled for Shenzhen in November, followed by the G20 summit in Miami in December.

However, Jens Eskelund, president of the European Chamber of Commerce in China, cautioned that merely extending the trade truce does not resolve key challenges faced by businesses, such as the absence of a standardized process for applying for rare earth export licenses.

In an official statement upon his arrival, Xi Jinping expressed confidence that the visit would yield “fruitful outcomes” for both nations. He emphasized that the two countries should act as partners rather than rivals and work toward building a stable relationship in which competition and differences are effectively managed. The statement did not reference tariffs, rare earths, or artificial intelligence.

State television footage showed U.S. President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump greeting Xi Jinping and China’s First Lady Peng Liyuan at the base of the Chinese leader’s aircraft. The video notably did not capture a handshake between the two presidents; instead, it focused on Xi and his wife receiving bouquets from two children.

Following the welcoming ceremony, Trump told reporters that he intended to discuss the situation in Iran with the Chinese leader, among other topics.

Prior to Xi’s arrival, Bessent met with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in New York. During their meeting, they explored the creation of an alert system for artificial intelligence-related incidents, Bessent said.

While executives from major U.S. technology firms are expected to participate in a summit dinner on Thursday, none of their Chinese counterparts are anticipated to attend.

Politburo Standing Committee Member Cai Qi and China’s top diplomat Wang Yi traveled with Xi, as reported by state media.

—CNBC’s Eunice Yoon and Ashlee Trujillo contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media