Technologies

Harvard astronomer begins new search for alien spaceships in our skies

The famous (or infamous, depending who you ask) scientist and E.T. believer, Avi Loeb, is out to capture some UAP sightings of his own.

Harvard’s most controversial astronomer is leading a new initiative, dubbed the Galileo Project, to check Earth’s skies and the rest of the solar system for signs of extraterrestrial intelligence.

Avi Loeb, the longtime astronomy professor who became well-known for his belief that interstellar object Oumuamua was likely an alien probe, announced the details of his plan via a virtual press conference Monday.

Officially, the initiative is described as «a transparent scientific project to advance a systematic experimental search for cross-validated evidence of potential astro-archaeological artifacts or active technical equipment made by putative existing or extinct extraterrestrial technological civilizations (ETCs).»

Translation: The plan is to use a variety of telescopes to look for alien spaceships, probes or other debris left behind by intelligent beings who weren’t born on Earth.

«What we see in our sky is not something that politicians or militarypersonnel should interpret because they were not trained as scientists,» Loeb told reporters. «It’s for the science community to figure out… based on non-governmental data that we will assemble as scientists.»

The first phase of the project involves setting up a network of dozens of relatively small telescopes around the globe that will attempt to capture new images of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP, the newly favored and more inclusive acronym designed to replace «UFOs»).

A highly anticipated report released by the US Director of National Intelligence in June confirmed the existence of a number of UAP, which the military and intelligence community can offer no certain explanations for.

«The goal of the Galileo Project is to bring the search for extraterrestrial technological signatures from accidental or anecdotal observations and legends to the mainstream of transparent, validated and systematic scientific research,» reads a statement.

New eyes on the sky

To do this, the plan is to focus solely on gathering new data and observations instead of analyzing past UAP sightings like those included in the recent DNI report. The new data will then be analyzed by algorithms and artificial intelligence to attempt to separate true UAP from birds, balloons, drones, satellites and other known explanations.

Project co-founder Frank Laukien, a visiting chemical biology scholar at Harvard and CEO of scientific instrument maker Bruker, noted the Galileo Project won’t be considering any alternative physics-based explanations for new UAP observations.

«We will stick, scientifically, to known physics but will make the data available,»Laukien said.

Loeb has become a polarizing figure in the astronomy community, especially since the release of his book outlining his Oumuamua hypothesis earlier this year, with a number of scientists accusing him of jumping to radical conclusions without appropriate evidence.

«Most scientists don’t discount the possible existence of these types of civilizations (the universe is vast!),» Justin Cowart, a Ph.D. candidate studying Martian geology, tweeted Monday.»But most don’t jump on extraordinary claims without extraordinary evidence, which Loeb likes to do.»

Loeb rejects the premise «extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence» but still hopes to collect some with his new project. Indeed, the nod to Galileo in the project name is a bit of a clap back at his critics by drawing a comparison to the famed 16th century astronomer who was imprisoned for his then-heretical suggestion the Earth revolved around the sun and not vice versa.

Looking further out, too

In addition to trying to spot UAP in the sky, the project also plans to use next-generation telescopes like the upcoming Vera C. Rubin Observatory to look for more objects in thesolar system like Oumuamua, as well as potential alien probes currentlyorbiting Earth to check us out in a low-key way. A description of the project even leaves open the possibility of designing its own purpose-built space observatory:

«We will conceptualize and design, potentially in collaboration with interested space agencies or space ventures, a launch-ready space mission to image unusual interstellar objects such as Oumuamua by intercepting their trajectories on their approach to the sun or by using ground-based survey telescopes to discover interstellar meteors.»

All this is naturally a potentially expensive proposition. Loeb told reporters he has received donations to his research fund at Harvard totaling over $1.75 million in the last two weeks with «no strings attached.»

He says the hope is to increase that funding level by at least ten-fold «to accomplish more rigorous study.»

As for when we could see new UAP images courtesy of the Galileo Project, Loeb said the team is currently selecting its telescopes and hopes to present «interesting results in the coming year.»

«It starts now,» he said.

Follow CNET’s 2021 Space Calendar to stay up to date with all the latest space news this year. You can even add it to your own Google Calendar.

Technologies

Which 2025 iPhone Has the Best Battery? I’ve Crowned a New Power Winner

I looked at three years of exclusive CNET data of iPhone performance to find out which models hold their charges best.

Key takeaways:

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has outstanding battery life that easily lasts all day with charge to spare.
Our exclusive lab data shows you don’t need to pay over a grand for excellent battery life. The $829 iPhone 17’s battery lasts just as long as the $1,099 iPhone 17 Pro.
The ultrathin iPhone Air, with a modest battery capacity, outlasted Samsung’s premium Galaxy S25 phones.

You might say that battery life is just a small consideration when buying a new iPhone or Android phone now, but that stance gets shaky when you’re staring down a sliver of red in the battery gauge and have nowhere to plug in. After reviewing smartphones for over a decade, I’ve learned that longer battery life is the one feature people consistently want from their phones.

When Apple launched the new iPhone 17 series and iPhone Air, it spent considerable time touting the longer battery life of the iPhone 17, 17 Pro, and 17 Pro Max, as compared to their predecessors.

My fellow CNET reviewers and I have now had the chance to test those claims.

When introducing the iPhone Air and its super slim design, Apple showed a slide during its keynote stating that it has all-day battery life. However, the company undercut its claim on the next slide when it announced a new MagSafe battery pack designed for the Air, which fed into fears that a thinner design might indicate a significant sacrifice to battery life.

Your phone’s battery life is affected by multiple variables, like how bright you keep your display or if your phone has a weak signal from your carrier. How you use your phone has a big impact, too. Someone who is obsessively online will have a much different experience with their battery life than someone who has their phone in their bag at work and checks it on breaks.

So, how do you know whether the battery life is good on the iPhone Air and iPhone 17 series?

CNET tested the new Apple phones’ battery life three ways: through an anecdotal stress test, a video streaming test and observing battery life after everyday use. We also tested wired and wireless charging. Our lab data showed strong battery life for the iPhone 17, 17 Pro, 17 Pro Max and even the Air, especially compared to older iPhone models.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

The iPhone 17 Pro Max has excellent battery life

Bigger batteries don’t always mean superior battery life. There’s more to battery life than the physical size or capacity. Besides Huawei, Apple is the only major smartphone maker that builds its own hardware and software and can tune its phones to work off smaller batteries than most Android phones have.

The iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max have larger batteries than last year’s 16 Pro and 16 Pro Max. If you’re using an eSIM-only version of either phone, like the iPhone models sold in the US, your battery is even bigger because it takes up the space where the SIM card tray would be.

Frustratingly, Apple doesn’t share the capacity of the iPhone’s batteries, and part of the reason is that its batteries are often smaller than those in Android phones. Fortunately, the EU requires that Apple publish energy labels that include the capacity of its batteries on its site. Macrumors found the capacities for eSIM-only models. You can see how the new phones’ batteries compare to the ones in the iPhone 16 series:

iPhone Air: 3,149 mAh
iPhone 17: 3,692 mAh
iPhone 17 Pro: 4,252 mAh
iPhone 17 Pro Max: 5,088 mAh
iPhone 16: 3,561 mAh
iPhone 16 Plus: 4,674 mAh
iPhone 16 Pro: 3,582 mAh
iPhone 16 Pro Max: 4,685 mAh

CNET has two benchmark tests (video streaming and stress tests) that allow us to compare the battery performance of one phone against another. And because we’ve been using these tests for years, we can also compare a new phone against older models.

For example, if you have an iPhone 15 and are considering upgrading to an iPhone 17, we can tell you that the new iPhone will have a longer battery life out of the box than your old one.

In CNET’s 3-hour video battery test, where we streamed a video over Wi-Fi with the screen at full brightness, the iPhone 17 series did terrific, even if the results were not dramatically better than the iPhone 16 series.

Without a Plus model this year, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is the only model with a big battery (the biggest one ever in an iPhone), and it only lost 9% in the test. The lower the percentage lost, the better. This is the first time an iPhone stayed in single digits, and I should note that the 17 Pro Max tied the Motorola Razr (2024) for the best score since we’ve been running the test. The Razr has a less powerful processor and a smaller main screen with a lower resolution and less brightness.

The iPhone Air and 17 Pro dropped 15% in the test, the same as the iPhone 15. And the iPhone 17 lost only 11%, better than the iPhone 15 and 16.

Something to keep in mind is that the iPhone 17 has a 6.3-inch screen that supports a 1-120Hz variable refresh rate and a max brightness of 3,000 nits, compared to the iPhone 15 and 16, which have a 6.1-inch display with a 60Hz refresh rate and a max brightness of 2,000 nits.

The new Apple phones did well in CNET’s 45-minute endurance test, during which I played games, streamed videos, scrolled social media and took a video call. The 17 Pro Max only dropped a single percent, the best result this year, but behind the iPhone 16 Plus, which stayed at 100% (the best result for any phone).

The iPhone 17 and 17 Pro had the same result, dropping 2%, making the standard iPhone 17 look even more like an incredible value. The iPhone Air dropped 5%, which matches the iPhone 15 in the same test. For perspective, the Air did better in this test than the Samsung Galaxy S25 series and tied with the Motorola Razr Ultra.

The iPhone Air gets through a day

When we review phones, we set them up as our daily driver to use and test them like our personal phones. Real-world testing is often the best indicator of what a reader can expect to get from a phone.

I started each day with a full battery for the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max and tracked how much battery I had throughout the day. I ended each day with plenty of battery left — even after shooting photos and videos or keeping the screen at full brightness while filming the review video. Below is a chart that shows how the iPhone 17 Pro Max’s battery performed for the first five days I had it.

Similarly, CNET senior technology reporter Abrar Al-Heeti highlights that the iPhone Air she reviewed regularly ends the day with about 20% to spare (after starting with a full battery). She said it would drop below 20% on heavier-use days by the time she was ready for bed.

«Impressively, the iPhone Air has consistently lasted all day over the last several weeks I’ve been using it,» Al-Heeti said. «But I’ve hardly had to touch that MagSafe battery pack to extend battery life during the day, which is reassuring.»

In our testing, a fully-charged MagSafe battery added 69% to the iPhone Air’s battery. When I asked her whether she’d recommend people buy the $99 MagSafe Battery for the Air, Al-Heeti said that she recommends it for someone who uses their phone often and doesn’t want to hunt for an outlet.

«I don’t like the idea of having to lug around an extra battery, no matter how thin or sleek it is, so I don’t tend to carry it with me unless I know I’m going to have a long day away from home,» Al-Heeti said.

She also reviewed the standard iPhone 17 and said it can easily last a little over a day, even after snapping photos, scrolling through social media, listening to audiobooks and music, texting and watching videos.

Al-Heeti’s review notes that over several days, she’d start with a full battery, between 8:30 and 9:30 a.m., and have 44% to 47% of a charge 12 hours later. If she didn’t recharge the iPhone 17 overnight, she’d still have about 30% to spare the next morning.

The iPhone 17 series charges fast

There are two ways to charge an iPhone: with a cable or with MagSafe (unless it’s the iPhone 16E, which doesn’t have MagSafe, just Qi charging). For wired charging, Apple recommends using a 40W charger with the iPhone 17, 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max and a 20W charger for the iPhone Air. However, Apple doesn’t include a charger in the box, just a USB-C cable, but the company does sell a 40W charger for $39 and a 20W charger for $19.

In our 30-minute wired charging test, the new phones, including the Air, did well. The iPhone 17, 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max added 10% or more than the iPhone 16, 16 Pro and 16 Pro Max in the same test. Apple says the 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max can recharge to 50% in 20 minutes. In our tests, the iPhone 17 Pro hit 53% and the iPhone 17 Pro Max hit 49% after 20 minutes.

The iPhone Air reached 49% in our 30-minute charging test with a 20W adapter, the same as the iPhone 16 and iPhone 15 Pro, beating the iPhone 15 Plus.

In wireless charging or MagSafe charging, we ran a 30-minute test with the latest MagSafe charger and a 30W power adapter. The iPhone 17 series and Air beat every iPhone we’ve ever tested except the iPhone 16 Pro, which did better than the Air and standard iPhone 17. I should note that iPhones don’t come with a MagSafe charger or 30W adapter in the box.

Which iPhone should you buy based on CNET Labs data?

Get the iPhone 17 Pro Max if you want the best battery life. The standard iPhone 17 has great battery life and inches out the more expensive iPhone 17 Pro. And if you’re on Team Air, know that the battery life isn’t great, but depending on how hard you use it, you should get through a day on a single charge.

I should also note that iOS 26 has a new Adaptive Power mode. This feature learns your phone’s use patterns and «adapts» how much power the processor uses for specific tasks, so it draws less from the battery. The new feature takes a week to start working. I turned it on after running CNET’s battery tests and will update this story with any changes or improvements that come from it.

Last, if you have an iPhone and the only issue is that its battery doesn’t charge as much as it used to, think about replacing it with a new one. Doing so will not only be hundreds of dollars cheaper than a new iPhone, but it can extend your phone’s life another couple of years.

Technologies

Apple Says a Digital Version of Your Passport Is Coming Soon to iPhones

The feature will be REAL ID compliant, but you still need a physical passport to leave the country.

Apple will soon allow iPhone owners to add digital versions of their US passports to their phones, said Jennifer Bailey, vice president for Apple Pay and Wallet, on Sunday.

The digital document will be compliant with REAL ID, but you’ll still need a physical US passport to fly internationally or cross US land borders with Canada and Mexico.

Apple wants to broaden how people can use its online Wallet feature for identification purposes. You can already use a digital ID for your driver’s license in certain states, and Bailey said Apple wants people to use Wallet for concert tickets, student IDs, house keys, car keys and more.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

Not for international travel

When the feature becomes available, iPhone users can scan their physical US passport to add it to the Wallet app, creating a digital ID that’s compliant with REAL ID. When flying domestically, travelers can show that digital version from their iPhone or Apple Watch, instead of using their physical passport, at participating TSA checkpoints. REAL ID is required to fly within the US and to US territories such as Puerto Rico.

However, travelers will not be able to use their digital ID to fly internationally, not even to Mexico or Canada. When crossing borders, you’ll still need your physical US passport to enter and leave the country.

Convenience … and risk

While relying on Apple Wallet might be convenient, there are risks, according to the Identity Management Institute, a global identity and access management organization. Possible dangers of digital ID wallets include security breaches, identity theft and data privacy issues. Losing your device is another major risk.

The organization said that people using digital ID wallets must take several precautions, which are good tips for any online activity.

Use strong, unique passwords or PINs.
Enable two-factor authentication.
Keep devices and software up to date.
Be cautious about where you’re making digital transactions. Verify that you’re shopping or otherwise using your digital ID at legitimate sites.

Technologies

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Tuesday, Oct. 28

Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for Oct. 28.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.

Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? I found 6-Across kind of tricky, as it could be so many different words. Read on for the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.