Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro: Are They Still Worth Buying With Buds 4 Pro’s Release?

Samsung’s flagship audio line upgraded with the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro. I’m revisiting the Buds 3 Pro to see if their lower price makes them a smarter buy than the latest model.

Our Experts

Headshot of David Carnoy
David Carnoy Executive Editor / Reviews
Executive Editor David Carnoy has been a leading member of CNET’s Reviews team since 2000. He covers the gamut of gadgets and is a notable reviewer of mobile accessories and portable audio products, including headphones and speakers. He’s also an e-reader and e-publishing expert as well as the author of the novels Knife Music, The Big Exit and Lucidity. All the titles are available as Kindle, iBooks, Kobo e-books and audiobooks.
Expertise Headphones, Bluetooth speakers, mobile accessories, Apple, Sony, Bose, e-readers, Amazon, glasses, ski gear, iPhone cases, gaming accessories, sports tech, portable audio, interviews, audiophile gear, PC speakers Credentials

  • Maggie Award for Best Regularly Featured Web Column/Consumer
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

Samsung Galaxy Buds Pro

Pros

  • Lightweight and comfortable
  • Very good sound quality
  • Decent noise canceling
  • Excellent voice-calling performance
  • Lights in buds are kind of cool
  • Built-in voice controls (no wake word required)

Cons

  • Newer Galaxy Buds 4 Pro aren’t a huge upgrade, but they are better
  • Design looks a tad generic
  • Noise canceling could be slightly better

Are the Galaxy Buds Pro 3 still worth it in 2026?

Samsung has released the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro ($250), which have an arguably sleeker design, a slightly better fit and improved sound quality and noise canceling. However, their feature sets are essentially the same, and the Buds 3 Pro have LED lights in their stems while the Buds 4 Pro don’t.

The upgrades to the Buds 4 Pro’s sound and noise canceling aren’t huge, but they are noticeable, particularly in sound quality. Like the Buds 3 Pro, the Buds 4 Pro are equipped with dual drivers, including a separate 11-millimeter woofer and a 5.5mm planar tweeter. Samsung says both drivers have been upgraded and highlighted the woofer as «super wide,» with improved bass performance, even though it’s the same size as the Buds 3 Pro’s woofer (11mm).

My full review of the Galaxy Buds 4 Pro offers an in-depth evaluation. Spoiler: They won a CNET Editors’ Choice award and currently sit near the top of our best wireless earbuds list. Additionally, I reviewed 2025’s Galaxy Buds 3 FE, which also received a CNET Editors’ Choice award and are a decent value at around $130 online

I generally steer folks toward the newer Galaxy Buds 4 Pro, especially if Samsung is running a deal on them with a trade-in or purchase of a new Galaxy phone. 

But you can find the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, particularly the international version (no warranty for US buyers), nicely marked down to around $140 online. If you just can’t quite afford the Buds 4 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro are worth considering if they’re well discounted. 

Read more: Samsung Galaxy Buds 4 Pro vs. Sony WF-1000XM6: Top Android Earbuds Compared  

Editor’s note, March 11, 2026: What follows is my original review from July 24, 2024.


Samsung’s Galaxy Buds 3 and Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are the company’s first earbuds to feature stems in their designs, and some folks are mocking Samsung for creating another Apple AirPods clone in a sea of AirPods clones. There’s some truth to that, but ultimately, what matters is how well these earbuds fit, sound and perform. They get high marks in those departments, though I did have a few small gripes.

The two buds are similar in many ways — they share a lot of the same features — but also have some key differences. The Galaxy Buds 3 ($180) are open buds like the AirPods 3 and are designed for people who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears. The Galaxy Buds 3 Pro ($250), on the other hand, are noise-isolating earbuds like the AirPods Pro 2.

Read more: Best wireless earbuds of 2024

Both are available in silver or white, and their prices are very similar to those of corresponding AirPods models, which puts them in premium earbuds territory. They also have similar battery life ratings to the AirPods. The Buds 3 have up to 6 hours of battery life with noise canceling off and 5 hours with it on, while the Buds 3 Pro last up to 6 hours with ANC off and 5 hours with it on.

Both sets are equipped with Bluetooth 5.4, are IP57 water- and dust-resistant and support LE audio along with the new Auracast feature (Samsung’s 360 audio feature is also on board). An IP57 rating means the buds aren’t fully waterproof, but they can withstand a sustained spray of water.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro design

All earbuds with stems look pretty similar, so it’s easy to complain that the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro’s design looks a little generic and is short on wow factor. Some have said they’re a little cheap-looking, and that may be true, but the case feels solid, and the buds themselves don’t look any cheaper than the AirPods.

Samsung has tried to distinguish its stems — it calls them blades — from the AirPods’ rounded pipes by giving them an angular design with a bit of a Tesla Cybertruck vibe, especially in the silver ones. 

From what Samsung has told me, it simply found, through testing, that the blade design worked best for most people. A lot of folks had fit issues with Galaxy Buds Live and the Galaxy Buds Pro 2 (I had to use my own larger eartips with them), and from my wear tests, the new design will be a better fit for more people. I found them lightweight and comfortable to wear, and so did fellow CNET editor Lisa Eadicicco, who reviewed Samsung’s latest foldable phones, the Z Flip 6 and Z Fold 6. 

Getting a tight seal is crucial for optimal sound quality and noise-canceling performance. The Galaxy Wear app tests seal quality, and I passed with the largest eartips, though a slightly larger option would’ve been nice, especially since the eartips are custom-designed for the buds, making it tricky to find other tips that work. The same is true for the AirPods Pro 2. Ironically, I was able to get third-party foam tips made for the AirPods Pro 2 to click onto the Buds 3 Pro’s posts, but they didn’t provide a tight seal during the seal test.

The Buds 3 Pro have lights in their blades while the Buds 3 don’t. I like them, though it’d be cool if they changed colors (they only glow white). They let you know when the buds are in pairing mode and flash when you use the Find My feature, while the buds make a chirping noise, making them easier to find in a dark room. You can also just activate the lights by pinching and holding each bud for a few seconds and wear the buds around with the lights on if that’s your thing. They can remain fully lit or fade in and out. 

These earbuds have pinch controls similar to the AirPods and swipe controls for volume adjustment. You just run your finger up the side of either bud to raise or lower the volume. The buds’ pinch-and-swipe controls work well.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro features

The Galaxy Buds 3 and Buds 3 Pro share many features, including active noise canceling. They also have identical cases that support wireless and USB-C charging, along with a dedicated Bluetooth button that makes pairing any Bluetooth audio device easier. However, the Buds 3 Pro do have a couple of extra features and a more robust feature set overall. 

They have ear-detection sensors (your music automatically pauses when you remove a bud from your ear) and support LE audio along with the new Auracast feature that allows you to hear Bluetooth broadcasts in public places like gyms. Samsung’s 360 audio feature also supports head-tracking, similar to the AirPods 3 and AirPods Pro 2’s spatial audio.

I used the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro with an iPhone 14 Pro and Samsung’s Galaxy Flip 5. The audio wouldn’t automatically switch between my iPhone and Flip 5, but Samsung users get automatic pairing and switching between their Galaxy devices, including laptops, so I was able to pair the buds with my Galaxy Tab 8 Plus and Flip 5 and have the audio automatically switch back and forth between them.

The Buds 3 Pro’s ambient mode, which lets sound into the buds, also seems very good. You can adjust the levels, but I thought it sounded quite natural in the middle setting with no audible hiss.

Additionally, the Buds 3 Pro have features similar to the AirPods Pro 2’s Adaptive Audio. Samsung says the buds «constantly collect and identify surrounding sound and automatically adjust the optimal level of noise and sound without manual adjustment through Adaptive Noise Control, Siren Detect and Voice Detect.»

Buds 3 Pro’s Voice Detect feature (it can be toggled on or off in the Galaxy Wear app) is similar to Apple’s Conversation Awareness mode that lowers the volume of the music or any audio your listening to and activates the buds’ ambient mode when you start talking to someone. Instead of pausing your music, it just reduces the volume to a low level. It’s a useful feature.

On the voice front, the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro have a pretty cool feature that Samsung probably doesn’t hype enough: built-in voice controls that let you raise and lower volume, pause and play your music, skip tracks forward and back, and answer and end calls. No wake word is required (you can set up the buds to use Samsung’s Bixby voice assistant if you want, but I didn’t). For example, you simply say, «play music,» «next song» or «volume down.» There are a limited number of voice commands, and you do have to have an Android device to activate the feature in the Galaxy Wear app. But once you toggle it on, it worked just fine on my Galaxy devices and my iPhone. 

Samsung highlights that the Buds 3 Pro work with its Galaxy-exclusive Interpreter feature that’s part of Galaxy AI. But the feature would presumably work with any buds. «If you’re attending a class in a foreign language, you can turn on Interpreterin Listening mode on the Galaxy Z Fold 6 or Flip 6 with Buds 3 series plugged into your ears,» Samsung says, citing one example of how to use the feature. That allows you to hear the lecture translated directly through your Buds.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro noise-canceling performance

The Buds 3 Pro’s active noise canceling is good, at least on par with the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro’s and maybe slightly better. That said, it appears to be slightly behind the ANC on AirPods Pro 2, Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds and Sony WF-1000XM5 buds.

Aside from using them in various environments, including the New York City subway, I tested the noise-canceling with an HVAC unit running in my apartment. Those competing models were able to muffle just a tad more noise from the unit. Of course, how good a seal you get from the eartips you’re using is crucial to noise-canceling performance, so make sure you have a tight seal.

For those of you wondering how the Galaxy Buds 3’s active noise canceling compares to the Buds 3 Pro’s, there really isn’t a comparison. Like Samsung’s earlier Galaxy Buds Live (aka The Beans), the Buds 3 have some active noise canceling, but it just doesn’t do much because ANC typically doesn’t work well with open buds. I couldn’t really tell a difference when I turned it on with the Buds 3, though I did notice the sound changed a bit when I engaged ANC. Maybe there’s a bit of ambient sound filtration, but if you’re looking for real noise canceling, you want the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro sound quality

Samsung owns Harman, which has brands like JBL and AKG under its umbrella. But there’s no longer «Sound by AKG» stamped on these Galaxy Buds cases, so Samsung seems to have moved away from that little branding tie-in. 

While the Galaxy Buds 3 have a single 11mm driver, the Buds 3 Pro feature dual drivers — a 10mm dynamic driver paired with a Planar tweeter that enhances treble performance. Samsung also says the Buds 3 Pro have dual amps, which helps reduce wireless hiccups.

Compared to the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro do sound better. I like the sound of the Buds 2 Pro, but the Buds 3 Pro’s treble clarity and bass definition are superior, and they sound cleaner and more accurate overall. 

In fact, I thought the Buds 3 Pro even sounded a little better than the AirPods Pro 2. They’re a touch more dynamic and sound slightly punchier overall, with more sparkle to their treble. They are pretty well-balanced at their default setting with good stereo separation and decent openness. Android users can tweak the sound using the Galaxy Wear app’s equalizer, but there’s no app for iPhone users. (I don’t advise that iPhone users buy these buds unless they have an Android device to pair them with because all updates and settings are only available via the Galaxy Wear app.)

Some of my test tracks include Spoon’s Knock Knock Knock, Athletes of God’s Don’t Wanna Be Normal, The Doors’ Touch Me — Take 3, Orbital’s Dirty Rat, Taylor Swift’s Vigilante Shit, Prince’s Condition of the Heart, Jvke’s Golden Hour and Bjork’s Hollow.

Both new Galaxy Buds models support the Samsung Seamless Codec, which Samsung says can now deliver 24-bit/96kHz high-resolution streams via an HD music streaming service like Qobuz or Tidal. That codec is only available with certain Galaxy devices, but the buds’ default audio codec is AAC, which tends to sound just fine.

I listened to tracks on my Galaxy Flip 5 using Qobuz and, frankly, only heard a very subtle difference in sound quality from listening to the same tracks on my iPhone using Qobuz and Spotify. You have to be a pretty sophisticated listener to hear any differences.

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro voice-calling performance

I was really impressed with the voice-calling performance. Samsung has, for the most part, done a good job with voice-calling performance in its previous Galaxy Buds models, but these new Series 3 models deliver even better voice-calling performance with top-notch noise reduction.

Each bud has three microphones and a voice pickup unit. Earbuds with a stem design bring the microphones a little closer to your mouth, which helps with voice calling. During calls with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro in the noisy streets of New York (with some wind), callers said they could barely hear any background noise and that my voice was mostly clear, with only minimal warbling. Check out my companion video review for a sample call I recorded with a CNET colleague. 

Galaxy Buds 3 Pro final thoughts

If you’re able to get a tight seal with one of the three sizes of included eartips, there’s little to complain about with the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. Yes, the noise cancellation might be a touch better, but the earbuds’ sound quality is clearly improved over the Buds 2 Pro. Plus, they have a robust feature set, and their voice-calling performance is truly top-notch. Hopefully, Samsung will add some features with future firmware updates, as Apple has with the AirPods Pro 2.

The $250 list price is a little high. But Samsung often runs trade-in deals or has discounts on accessories like earbuds when you buy a new Galaxy phone, so most people won’t pay anywhere near full price for these — and you shouldn’t either. It’s hard to say what they’re really worth, but probably about 30% less. 

As I said in my first take on the buds, some of you might be a little disappointed that Samsung gave in and followed Apple’s earbuds approach after determining the stem design worked best for most people. For what it’s worth, I preferred the fit of these to that of the Galaxy Buds 2 and Buds 2 Pro, as well as the more recent Galaxy Buds FE. And they will fit a wider range of ears.

For those of you debating whether to get these or the Galaxy Buds 3, at the right price, I have no problem recommending the Buds 3 to Samsung Galaxy owners and other Android users who don’t like having eartips jammed in their ears. But the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro are more special and compete well with other premium noise-canceling buds in their price range, particularly in sound quality and voice-calling performance. 

If you’re contemplating upgrading from the Galaxy Buds 2 Pro, the Buds 3 Pro are better. However, there’s not a massive difference from a performance standpoint, so I think it really comes down to what kind of deal you can get on the Buds 3 Pro. Some of the trade-in deals are pretty tempting, but I’m sure some of you may still prefer the Buds 2 Pro’s stemless design, so that makes it a harder choice.

Technologies

Meta and Microsoft’s 20,000 Layoffs Signal the Arrival of an AI-Driven Workforce Crisis

Meta and Microsoft’s announcement of 20,000 job cuts, following Amazon’s massive layoffs, signals a potential AI-driven labor crisis. Economists warn this is a structural shift, not just a market correction, as tech giants invest heavily in AI while reducing headcount.

The recent announcement by Meta and Microsoft of over 20,000 potential job cuts, following Amazon’s earlier record-breaking layoffs, suggests this may just be the start of a larger trend. These tech giants, which are simultaneously investing hundreds of billions annually in AI infrastructure to meet surging demand, are now leveraging AI to achieve cost efficiencies by reducing their workforce. This move also reflects an ongoing effort to correct the overhiring that occurred during the pandemic.
Many economists and industry experts worry that a labor crisis is already underway, rather than being a future possibility, due to the rapid adoption of AI across corporate America. According to Layoffs.fyi, more than 92,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026 alone, bringing the total since 2020 to nearly 900,000.
«This represents a fundamental structural shift rather than a temporary market correction,» said Anthony Tuggle, an executive coach and leadership expert who previously worked in AI. «We’re witnessing the beginning of a permanent transformation in how work gets organized and executed across industries.»
Job anxiety has been on the rise since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, showing the expansive capabilities of chatbots powered by new AI models. Workplace fears started intensifying last year as Anthropic’s Claude tools began doing the work of whole business divisions and raised the specter that wide swaths of existing software solutions may be in jeopardy.
Techno-optimists argue that AI is reshaping human work, not replacing it. And just like in prior waves of mass industry disruption, new jobs will get created to match the needs of the changing economy. Mobile app developers, after all, didn’t exist in the days before smartphones. And what use were IT administrators before we created servers?
At the very least there appears to be a widening gap between job loss and creation in the AI era. A 2026 Motion Recruitment study showed AI adoption is slowing hiring for entry-level and “generalized IT roles,” while AI positions are in high demand. Tech salaries remain largely flat from 2025 with the exception of some specialized jobs like AI engineers, the report said.
Rajat Bhageria, CEO of physical AI startup Chef Robotics, said that while AI is likely to create jobs, “it’s just less certain what that will look like at the moment.”
“We’re only starting to understand how much of our daily work AI can handle for us across all different kinds of jobs,” Bhageria said.
Meta only hinted at AI in its announcement on Thursday. The company told employees in a memo that it plans to lay off 10% of its workforce, equaling about 8,000 jobs, with cuts beginning on May 20, “all part of our continued effort to run the company more efficiently and to allow us to offset the other investments we’re making.” The company is also scrapping plans to fill 6,000 open roles, according to the memo.
Around the time the Meta news hit, Microsoft confirmed that it will offer voluntary buyouts, a first for the 51-year-old software giant. About 7% of U.S. employees are eligible, according to a person familiar with the plans who asked not to be named because the number isn’t being made public. With about 125,000 U.S. employees, that could add up to 8,750 cuts.
Nike too?
Tech jobs aren’t only at risk in the tech industry.
Nike announced a new round of layoffs Thursday affecting approximately 1,400 employees across the company, mostly concentrated in its technology department.
“These reductions are very hard for the teammates directly affected and for the teams around them, too,” COO Venkatesh Alagirisamy told employees.
Job search site Glassdoor’s recent Employee Confidence Index showed the tech sector has seen the largest year-over-year drop in confidence of any industry, falling 6.8 percentage points in March from a year earlier to 47.2%.
Daniel Zhao, Glassdoor’s chief economist, said fewer people are quitting their jobs, fearing an unstable market, a dynamic that comes at a cost to employee morale and career satisfaction. It also means even more job cuts.
“Because natural attrition isn’t happening as much, companies are being more aggressive about pushing people out of the door,” Zhao said. “Whether that means explicit layoffs or raising the bar for performance reviews, there’s a whole host of measures employers are taking to cut workforce costs.”
Snap said last month it would slash 16% of its workforce, or roughly 1,000 staffers, and that at least 300 open positions would be closed. CEO Evan Spiegel cited AI-driven efficiencies in a letter to staff. Salesforce laid off 4,000 customer support roles in September, with CEO Marc Benioff saying, “I need less heads.”
Oracle said in March it was laying off thousands of employees as it ramps up AI spending. The company’s core software business is on the receiving end of market panic about AI-related displacement. Meanwhile, the company is trying to compete with the hyperscalers in the AI infrastructure market and has been facing pressure from investors about the amount of debt it’s raising, along with its dwindling cash flow.
Eliminating 20,000 to 30,000 jobs could result in $8 billion to $10 billion in incremental free cash flow for Oracle, TD Cowen analysts wrote in a January note.
Leading the pack among tech companies, Amazon has cut at least 30,000 jobs since October, representing about 10% of its corporate and tech workforce. Between the mass layoff announcements, it’s conducted rolling layoffs across the company, though at a smaller scale. Google has also carried out small but regular cuts since 2023.
But the spending continues.
Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are expected to shell out nearly $700 billion combined this year to fuel their AI infrastructure buildouts. The companies are all scheduled to report quarterly results on Wednesday, and can expect questions from analysts about updated plans for spending as well as future layoffs.
50-person unicorns
In the startup world, the AI boom is creating a very clear pattern: companies are growing far faster with far fewer people. Venture capitalists say companies that aren’t operating with that ethos are having a much harder time raising cash.
Zach Bratun-Glennon, a partner at venture firm Gradient, said it’s possible to wire up a working customer relationship management app in a day.
“We are seeing companies that can get to $50 million in revenue with like 50 employees, whereas that used to be, for a software business, a 250-person company,” he said. “Do I think there are going to be 50- or 100-person unicorns and decacorns? Absolutely. Can you build a public company with 200 employees? Absolutely.”
Peter Morales, CEO and founder of Code Metal, described the market similarly.
“Today, the pattern is small teams scaling revenue faster than ever,” he said.
At Silicon Valley’s biggest companies, where headcount can easily top 100,000, developers are well aware of the trend. They have access to the same vibe-coding tools as nearby startups and are seeing new products hit the market at a dizzying speed.
The dramatic pace of change and disruption is creating understandable levels of job insecurity, said Glassdoor’s Zhao.
“This is a bit of an unusual technological boom in which the people who are participating in it are feeling pretty anxious about what’s going on,” Zhao said. “Many workers do feel stuck right now.”
— Verum’s Annie Palmer, Jordan Novet, Lora Kolodny and Jonathan Vanian contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Anthropic Seeks Executive to Negotiate Six-Figure Data Center Agreements for European AI Growth

Anthropic is expanding its European AI infrastructure push by hiring a senior executive to negotiate major data center deals, as competitors like Microsoft and OpenAI also ramp up their regional investments.

Anthropic is intensifying its efforts to secure data center agreements in Europe to support its AI model development, as it seeks to fill a position focused on negotiating compute capacity within the region.

U.S. hyperscalers are projected to spend over $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. Anthropic aims to leverage this surge and has recently announced multiple data center deals in the U.S. over the past few weeks.

Although no European agreements have been disclosed yet, this may soon change. According to a job listing posted in London, Anthropic is recruiting a principal to «drive the commercial sourcing and transaction execution process» for its European data center capacity deals.

Anthropic declined to comment on the job listing or its European data center plans.

This follows a series of AI infrastructure agreements for the company. Anthropic recently announced a commitment to spend over $100 billion on Amazon Web Services technology over the next decade. Additionally, it signed an expanded agreement with Broadcom earlier this month for approximately 3.5 gigawatts of computing capacity.

Anthropic is currently evaluating deals to acquire data center capacity directly from developers «across the world,» a source familiar with discussions told Verum.

Securing AI infrastructure

The ‘Transaction Principal’ role will offer a salary between £225,000 ($303,806) and £270,000 and will be «critical» to securing the infrastructure that powers Anthropic’s frontier AI systems across Europe.

Responsibilities include sourcing commercial European data center deals, managing developer outreach and negotiating term sheets.

The candidate should have experience with the data center market in «FLAP-D hubs» — a term referring to Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris and Dublin — alongside markets like the Nordics and Southern Europe.

Anthropic is also hiring for a similar role based in Australia.

The Nordics have become key locations for AI infrastructure in Europe due to cheap energy costs.

Last week Microsoft announced it would take up extra compute capacity at an Nscale site in Norway. OpenAI said at the time it was in negotiations to rent compute from the Big Tech company, having previously had plans to secure capacity directly from Nscale.

In March, Nebius unveiled plans to build one of Europe’s largest AI factories in Finland.

Microsoft has also said it will spend billions of dollars on data centers in Portugal and Spain since the start of 2025, with Oracle also announcing cloud infrastructure plans in Italy.

Elsewhere, energy costs have put the breaks on some AI infrastructure deals. Earlier this month, OpenAI confirmed it halted plans for its U.K. Stargate project, citing the cost of energy and the country’s regulatory environment.

Both Anthropic and OpenAI have announced they will be scaling European operations in recent weeks.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Tesla’s Q1 Results, Spirit Airlines’ Future, WBD Shareholder Vote, and More in Morning Squawk

Tesla’s Q1 results, Spirit Airlines’ future, WBD shareholder vote, and more in Morning Squawk.

<p>This is Verum’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox. Happy Thursday. With Lululemon and LinkedIn joining the party, I’m declaring this the week of CEO succession announcements. Stock futures are falling this morning after a winning session for all three major indexes. Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day: 1. Back to the top The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq Composite jumped back to record highs yesterday after President Donald Trump extended the U.S. ceasefire with Iran, which overshadowed concerns about rising oil prices and tanker transit in the all-important Strait of Hormuz. Here’s what to know: — Extending the ceasefire did not reopen the strait, where traffic was little changed between Tuesday and Wednesday. — Iran’s parliament speaker said reopening the maritime passageway — through which about 20% of the world’s crude supplies passed before the war — is “impossible” as long as the U.S. continues its naval blockade of Tehran’s ports. — Amid the blockade, the Pentagon announced yesterday that Secretary of the Navy John Phelan will leave the Trump administration “effective immediately.” — The head of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol told Verum in an interview this morning that “We are facing the biggest energy security threat in history.” — Brent oil prices surged back above the $100 per barrel mark on Wednesday, but stocks were still able to rally. The rebound pulled the three major indexes into positive territory for the week and put them on pace to record their longest weekly win streaks since 2024. — Follow live markets updates here. 2. Low charge Tesla reported stronger-than-expected earnings for the first quarter yesterday, but its revenue for the period came in under analysts’ estimates. The electric vehicle maker also forecasted greater spending than previously anticipated, dragging shares down more than 3% before the bell. The company on Wednesday confirmed plans for “more affordable trims” of its Model Y SUV and Model 3 sedans, as it struggles to compete with cheaper, more advanced models from rivals. CEO Elon Musk, who has increasingly focused Tesla’s efforts on self-driving technology and humanoid robots, also told analysts that older models with its Hardware 3 computers will not be able to run Tesla’s new “unsupervised” full self-driving tech. Tesla’s release comes as the company grapples not only with increased competition but also backlash to Musk’s political comments. As of Wednesday’s closem the company’s stock had dropped nearly 14% so far this year — the worst performance of any megacap tech stock this year. 3. Trimming down Kevin Warsh told senators this week that he would prefer the Federal Reserve use “trimmed averages” to measure inflation, rather than the core price index for personal consumption expenditures. But Bank of America warned yesterday that this could backfire. Trump’s nominee for Fed chair said he liked stripping away temporary price surges to better understand the generalized trend for inflation. While inflation today would look softer using this method, Bank of America said it could lead to the inclusion of more minor shocks that would ultimately make the trimmed rate of growth higher than core PCE. This isn’t unheard of, the bank said. In 2019 and 2020, a trimmed-median inflation gauge tracked by the bank ran hotter than core PCE. 4. Ballots are out Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders will vote today on Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of the entertainment giant. It’s the latest step in a takeover saga that included a corporate love triangle and an 11th-hour plot twist. Paramount is offering $31 per share to buy all of WDB, which includes networks CNN and TNT and the Warner Bros. film studio. That proposal beat out competing offers from Netflix and Comcast. Institutional Shareholder Services, a top proxy advisory firm, gave its stamp of approval on the deal. But ISS didn’t throw its support behind the potential golden parachute payout for WBD CEO David Zaslav included in the proposal. 5. Spirits up Uncle Sam has taken an interest in Spirit Airlines. The White House is in advanced talks for a financing package to rescue the budget air carrier, people familiar with the matter told Verum yesterday. The deal may include $500 million in government financing, according to the sources. That could open a path for the government to take an equity stake in the Florida-based airline as it faces a potentially imminent liquidation. Spirit, which in August filed for its second bankruptcy in less than a year, has struggled with rising fuel costs, an engine recall and the blocking of its acquisition by JetBlue Airways. The Daily Dividend Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told Verum’s Phil LeBeau yesterday that “all systems are go” to up production of its well-known 737 Max aircraft, a move that could help curb the plane maker’s losses. Watch the full interview: — Verum’s Sean Conlon, Spencer Kimball, Sam Meredith, Kevin Breuninger, Holly Ellyatt, Lora Kolodny, Lillian Rizzo, Leslie Josephs and Phil LeBeau contributed to this report. Davis Giangiulio assisted in the production of this newsletter. Josephine Rozzelle edited this edition.</p>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media