Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Review: A Pocket-Sized Powerhouse, but It’s Not for Everyone

At $2,900, Samsung’s latest foldable is a true phone-tablet hybrid and a multitasker’s dream. But more isn’t always better.

Our Experts

Headshot of Abrar Al-Heeti
Abrar Al-Heeti Senior Technology Reporter
Abrar’s interests include phones, streaming, autonomous vehicles, internet trends, entertainment, pop culture and digital accessibility. In addition to her current role, she’s worked for CNET’s video, culture and news teams. She graduated with bachelor’s and master’s degrees in journalism from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Though Illinois is home, she now loves San Francisco — steep inclines and all.
Expertise Abrar has spent her career at CNET analyzing tech trends while also writing news, reviews and commentaries across mobile, streaming and online culture. Credentials

  • Named a Tech Media Trailblazer by the Consumer Technology Association in 2019, a winner of SPJ NorCal’s Excellence in Journalism Awards in 2022 and has three times been a finalist in the LA Press Club’s National Arts & Entertainment Journalism Awards.
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

The writer holds an unfolded Galaxy TriFold. Since the phone is not fully flat, creases are visible.

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Pros

  • Generous 6.5-inch cover screen
  • Long-lasting battery
  • Multitasking is seamless
  • Excellent camera

Cons

  • Prohibitive $2,900 price
  • Typing on main display is difficult
  • Not all apps work well with 10-inch display
  • Phone feels clunky when closed

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a spectacle. With a display split into three sections that fold and unfold like a pamphlet, it’s a phone that essentially doubles as a tablet when open. The TriFold is the result of Samsung’s yearslong effort to make its foldable phones sleeker and more compact — and, ultimately, more practical. 

As one friend aptly put it when I first showed her the TriFold: “So you’re just walking around with an iPad in your pocket?” More like a Galaxy Tab, but yes, that’s the idea.

With such a unique design and a prohibitive $2,900 price tag ($3,164 after taxes and fees), who is the TriFold really for? I spent two weeks using Samsung’s two-in-one device to see how it performed and to better understand its target audience. If one thing is clear from this phone’s limited availability and sky-high cost, it’s not exactly a mass-market product.

Samsung spent a good deal of 2025 touting its mobile design innovations, from the super slim Galaxy S25 Edge to the ultrasleek Galaxy Z Fold 7. It capped off the year with the debut of the Galaxy Z TriFold, which launched in December in some parts of the world and arrived in the US in late January. For years, foldable phones have been clunky and rather impractical, with narrow cover displays and subpar cameras. They’ve come a long way, and consumers no longer have to sacrifice practicality for novelty. (They still have to sacrifice a good amount of money, though.)

The TriFold feels like the culmination of Samsung’s technological advancements. Still, it’s a very niche device and is a reminder that more isn’t always better, at least not for everyone.

How the Galaxy Z TriFold feels in my hand

It’s safe to say I’ve never used a phone that feels like the Galaxy Z TriFold, open or closed. Though the phone borrows many attributes from its Galaxy Z Fold 7 sibling, it’s in a league of its own — aside from Huawei’s Mate XT Ultimate, a trifold sold outside the US. 

The TriFold opens up to a 10-inch display that’s sectioned into three thin panels, each measuring 3.9mm, 4mm and 4.2mm at the thickest point (not accounting for the camera bump).

When the phone is open, it feels sleek and relatively lightweight for what it’s packing, clocking in at 309 grams. I can hold it with one hand or two, though two feels more comfortable. 

However, when the phone is unfolded, I tend to accidentally tap the home or back button with my palm or fingers as I hold it up, since the bezels are so thin. The jury is still out on whether I’m just a klutz, but I think part of it is just getting used to fresh hardware design — and Samsung potentially tweaking the placement of certain controls in future iterations. 

When the TriFold is shut, its sleekness all but disappears. With three panels stacked together, the phone feels rather dense and measures a slightly clunky 12.9mm thick. It’s not prohibitively bulky, but the noticeable heft definitely sets it apart from bar-style phones; for instance, the Galaxy S25 is only 7.2mm thick. It also distinguishes it from the Z Fold 7, which measures just 8.9mm thick when closed. But that extra panel on the TriFold has to go somewhere. 

Still, the TriFold’s 6.5-inch cover screen serves up enough real estate to comfortably do anything you’d do on a standard phone, like send texts, scroll through Instagram or check an email.

The TriFold’s camera bump is about as pronounced as you’d expect on any premium phone today. The three rear lenses sit on a raised platform, as they do on the Z Fold 7, and my index finger often brushes up against it, given the vertical layout. It’s not a big deal, but I do wish that weren’t the case.

As satisfying as it is to snap a book-style foldable shut, feeling that sensation twice with the TriFold is delightful. When I first got my hands on this phone, I was grateful for the on-screen and haptic alerts warning me to close the left-side panel first. (Being right-handed, this was a slight learning curve.) But I got the hang of it surprisingly quickly. It’s nice that the section with the power and volume buttons protrudes slightly to the right, making it easy to access those controls when the phone is fully folded. 

The Galaxy Z TriFold comes with a case that snaps onto the back panel and covers one of the hinges. It’s a neat perk to have that option, but I didn’t want anything coming between me and my slick new phone, so I didn’t use it.

The TriFold does not have S Pen support. While that may feel like a missed opportunity, I don’t think it detracts from the device’s practicality. Just tap away with your fingers (or a connected keyboard), and you’ll be good.

Each display has its purpose

The drastically different sizes of the cover and main displays means each serves an ideal purpose. Similar to my experience with book-style foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold 7, I tended to use the TriFold’s 6.5-inch cover display the majority of the time. 

For most tasks, like taking photos, scrolling through social media and messaging (the bulk of what I do on a phone), the smaller display and configuration is ideal. It’s easier to hold the TriFold in that layout, and typing is much, much easier than on the expansive main display.

At times, I even opted for watching a YouTube video in landscape mode on the cover screen — despite a much more spacious display lying just two unfolds away — because it still did the trick, and the phone was easier to handle when moving around.

Like other foldables, the TriFold’s app continuity function means whatever you’re doing on the cover screen is seamlessly carried over to the main display when you open the phone. This is ideal when watching videos: If you decide you want to move to the inside screen, the content keeps rolling and the audio doesn’t stop as you unfurl the phone.  

I used the 10-inch main display about a third of the time and primarily when watching videos or multitasking. Like with Samsung’s book-style foldable, you can run up to three apps simultaneously, but the TriFold’s roomier display lets each app feel less crammed than on the Z Fold 7.

I even tried working on the TriFold while multitasking. I was able to have Google Docs, Slack and CNET’s content management system open all at once. It was tight, but it worked.

To really tap into the phone’s spacious display, you can use Samsung DeX, which essentially turns any app on the TriFold into a window you can drag around and resize however you’d like (much as you would on a computer interface). I tested this while writing this review; in fact, this whole section is coming to you via DeX, after pairing the phone to a wireless mouse and keyboard.

It’s all pretty seamless and feels like working on a mini monitor. Old habits die hard, though, and I look forward to going back to my 16-inch laptop with a larger screen and attached keyboard.

The TriFold was my trusty entertainment companion when I caught strep throat halfway through reviewing this phone. I watched endless Pixar movies and YouTube videos when I was stuck in bed. The Z Fold 7’s 8-inch display is great for this too, but the TriFold’s notably larger screen takes the experience to the next level. It didn’t even feel like I was watching on a phone anymore; it felt like I’d switched to a tablet. 

And now, the question you’ve likely been waiting for me to answer: How obvious are the two creases on the main display?

Well, you can still see them, but they virtually disappear when you’re actually using the phone or watching something. The creases are also more subdued than on the Z Fold 7, so it’s likely Samsung is slowly working its way toward eliminating them altogether. But we’re not there yet. 

I refrain from using the main display for social media scrolling because many apps aren’t well-suited for that horizontal format. Some Instagram posts look grainy when stretched on the 10-inch display, and Reels are weirdly cropped in my feed until I click into them.

Other apps, like X and DoorDash, don’t fill the screen, but rather sit square in the middle, bordered by thick blank bars. I can tap arrows to shift the on-screen content to the left or right for easier scrolling, though. 

Galaxy Z TriFold battery life and performance

One thing that impressed me most about the Galaxy Z TriFold is how well the 5,600-mAh battery held up. The three-cell battery is split between the panels to extend how long each charge lasts. I could stream, surf the web and snap photos as much as I wanted without worrying about being stranded with a dead phone, even while keeping the Always-on display enabled. 

Across multiple days of testing, the TriFold lasted me nearly a day and a half before needing to recharge. For instance, one day I began with a full battery at 7 a.m., and the phone lasted until 2:30 p.m. the next afternoon. On another day, I went from 100% battery at 9:20 a.m. on a Saturday to 0% at 6:33 p.m. on Sunday evening. In each instance, I did a good deal of streaming, texting, ordering food delivery, scrolling through Instagram and X, and going down YouTube rabbit holes, regularly switching between the cover and main displays. 

Speaking of charging, the TriFold supports 45-watt super-fast charging. That’s good for Samsung, but merely OK when compared to the much faster charging you can get with several other phones like the OnePlus 15 (up to 100 watts) and Motorola’s 2025 Moto G Stylus (68 watts). But 45 watts gets the TriFold from 0% to 61% in half an hour, so I can’t complain. The phone reaches a full charge in about an hour and 15 minutes. 

This was rather shocking, but you’ll get both a charging cable and a charging brick in the Z TriFold box. Wild, right? With most phone makers these days opting not to include extras with their devices, I’m glad Samsung chose to at least toss in a charging brick with the TriFold, given its astronomical price.

In CNET’s 45-minute endurance test, which involves streaming, scrolling through social media, joining a video call and playing games on the internal display, the Galaxy Z TriFold’s battery went from full to 92%. That’s lower than the 96% I got with Google’s Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the 95% on the Oppo Find N5. But it’s only slightly less than the 93% I got with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is pretty impressive given there’s a whole other panel to power on the TriFold.

In a longer, 3-hour streaming test over Wi-Fi, I watched a YouTube video in full-screen mode at full brightness on the inner display. The TriFold’s battery dropped from 100% to 76%.

That’s not too far off the 78% I got with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. But both are handily beaten by the 84% I got with the Z Fold 7 and the 89% on the Oppo Find N5.

The TriFold is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, which powers the many Galaxy AI and Gemini features on board, like Generative Edit for photos, Live Translate and Circle to Search.

The phone runs Android 16 and Samsung’s One UI 8 out of the box, and it supports seven years of software and security updates — which is the least I’d expect from a phone that costs more than the average laptop.

It has the same chip that powers last year’s Galaxy S25 phones — so, not quite the latest and greatest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor launched in the fall, but it’s still powerful silicon.

Benchmark tests for the CPU in Geekbench 6 place the Z TriFold above the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, the Motorola Razr Ultra and the Galaxy S25 Edge, and it’s on par with the Galaxy Z Fold 7. 

In a graphics test using 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme, the TriFold exceeded the performance of the S25 Edge, the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Pixel 10 Pro XL, but it was beaten out by the Z Fold 7.

Check out the graphs below for more specifics.

Geekbench v.6.0

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 2,980 9,582Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 2,944 9,379Google Pixel 10 Pro XL 2,288 6,215Motorola Razr Ultra 2,837 8,705Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 2,875 9,013
  • Single-core
  • Multicore
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 5,909Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 6,424Google Pixel 10 Pro XL 3,354Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 5,789Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 5,702
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance.

The Galaxy Z TriFold’s camera takes stunning photos

The Galaxy Z TriFold’s top-notch cameras are further evidence of how far foldables have come. Like the Z Fold 7, the TriFold has a 200-megapixel wide, 12-megapixel ultrawide and 10-megapixel telephoto camera on the back, as well as a 10-megapixel selfie camera on both the cover and inside displays. 

I really enjoyed snapping photos on this phone and was regularly blown away by what it captured. Here are a few of my favorite shots:

The TriFold doesn’t compromise on camera quality. The photos are comparable to what you’d capture on the flagship Galaxy S series. And at nearly $3,000, I’d sure hope so.

Galaxy Z TriFold final thoughts

After using the Galaxy Z TriFold for a couple of weeks, it became clear that this phone is for a very specific subset of people. And I’m not sure that includes me.

I’ve enjoyed the novelty and versatility of the TriFold: It can easily double as a workstation or tablet for watching movies or multitasking. Still, it offers more than I’d realistically need from a phone. 

My usual tasks include scrolling through social media, texting and taking photos — all things you don’t need a 10-inch display for. And even when I want to watch a video on a larger display, I’m happy to settle for the 8-inch screen on the Z Fold 7, especially since that phone more closely matches the thickness of a standard, nonfolding phone when it’s closed. The TriFold’s beefier build when closed is a bit of a drawback for me.

But I think plenty of people will feel like the TriFold is the perfect fit for their lifestyles. Business-oriented power users in particular might appreciate that this phone essentially serves as a mini laptop you can just fold up and toss in your pocket. Anyone who wishes they could combine their phone and tablet into one gadget will find that the TriFold does the trick. Plus, watching movies and YouTube videos really is a wonderful experience on this phone, especially if you’re always on the go.

What’s harder to stomach is the TriFold’s astronomical $3,000 price, which will keep it out of the hands of all but the savviest tech fans and those with the deepest pockets.

Still, this phone embodies what foldable phones have long strived to be: versatile, innovative and practical. And honestly, it’s just a joy to use.

Technologies

Mohamed El-Erian tells Verum global bond sell-off likely not done yet

Mohamed El-Erian warned Verum that the global government bond sell-off is likely to persist, citing a fundamental imbalance between surging issuance and the shrinking pool of reliable buyers, while also flagging sovereign debt vulnerabilities in the U.K., Japan and France.

Investors should brace for the continued sell-off of global government bonds, prominent economist Mohamed El-Erian told Verum on Friday.

“I don’t see any appetite in the U.S. for immediate fiscal consolidation. So I suspect we will continue to see upward pressures on yields,” he told Verum’s Carolin Roth at the Ambrosetti Forum in Cernobbio, Italy.

Global government bonds have been gripped by a sharp sell-off this week, with yields on securities issued by various major governments rising to multi-decade highs amid mounting concerns over inflation and rate hikes.

Bond yields and prices move inversely to one another.

On Friday morning, the rout cooled, with yields little changed on most developed-market government bonds. U.S. Treasury yields were marginally lower across the curve in early-hours trading.

El-Erian, the Rene M. Kern Practice Professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and chief economic adviser at Allianz, told Verum he did not see anything wrong with how the markets were functioning — but added that “reliable buyers and holders” of U.S. Treasurys were coming under pressure.

“China, for geopolitical purposes, is no longer as willing,” he said. “Japan and the Gulf countries have domestic issues.”

He also pointed to the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund rethinking its allocation to U.S. government bonds.

“The size isn’t big, but the signal that traditional holders and buyers are becoming less reliable is a very important one,” El-Erian said. “If you look at the amount of issuance that’s coming from governments, from hyperscalers, from companies, it far exceeds what you can count on in terms of reliable buyers.

“And that’s why there’s been pressure on interest rates. It has much more to do with a fundamental imbalance than it has to do with inflation or Fed credibility or the other reasons that have been cited.”

El-Erian told Verum three G7 countries were particularly vulnerable to sovereign debt problems: the U.K., Japan and France.

“Those by numbers, by everything else, and the U.K. in particular is what I call a high-beta country,” he said. “That every time rates move by a bit in the U.S., they move by a lot more in the U.K.”

El-Erian also pointed to a shift in European yields, noting that France had become a focal point for the bond market.

“In the old days you would worry about Italy. Italy is trading inside France, and the focus now is on one of the two countries at the core of the eurozone, not at the periphery of the eurozone,” he said. “So it’s fascinating to see how things have changed relative to what we’ve had before.”

U.S. Treasury department’s ‘step too far’

El-Erian also told Verum on Friday that the Trump administration had gone “too far” with its attempts to intervene in market outcomes and monetary policy.

Last month, the U.S. Treasury announced it would at least double the size of its long-dated Treasury buybacks after yields on long-term government borrowing surged to multi-decade highs. On Thursday, U.S. Vice President JD Vance called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, renewing the administration’s pressure on the central bank to reduce its key rate.

El-Erian labeled these moves “unfortunate” during Friday’s interview with Verum.

“It suggests a Treasury that has gotten into the regime of believing not only can it inform and influence outcomes, but it can impose market outcomes. I think that’s a step too far,” he said. “And the question now is, how do you step back from this? I think the results are clear. It’s a massive market. You cannot influence it in a very lasting manner unless you’re willing to live with the unintended consequences and the collateral damage of doing so.”

Verum reached out to the U.S. Treasury Department for comment.

He added that Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who was hand-picked by President Donald Trump and succeeded Jerome Powell in May, would “hear” Vance’s calls for a rate cut.

“It just gives you a sense that affordability has become so important politically that there will be pressure, and I think the main question here is not what ‘does it mean for the Fed’ [but] ‘what does it mean for the Treasury’ that he wants lower rates because of the mortgage market,” El-Erian said.

Markets are currently pricing in a near 50-50 chance of the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee hiking rates versus holding them at their September meeting, according to the CME’s FedWatch tool.

Warsh gets ‘three things right’ at Jackson Hole

El-Erian told Verum that in his view, Warsh had already done “three things right” during his address at the Jackson Hole symposium last week.

“First, he addressed the concerns about his reaction function,” he said. “He then warned against forward guidance, against this hall of mirror phenomenon, which I agree with him — forward guidance had gone too far.”

“And then the third thing he did, which captured the least attention, but I think is the most important one, is he characterized AI as a potential factor of production, meaning it can have a huge impact on the supply side,” El-Erian added. “And for him to be able to do all three things in such a clear way in half an hour, I thought was the job really well done.”

Continue Reading

Technologies

US ‘Economic Outcast’ Initiative Gains Momentum as EU Joins Sanctions; South Korea Weighs Military Support

The EU has formally joined the US-led sanctions campaign against Iran, while South Korea is weighing a military role to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as Washington pushes allies to support its campaign on both financial and military fronts. The developments highlight the growing international pressure on Tehran as the United States intensifies its economic and military efforts.

The European Union has officially aligned with the United States’ sanctions drive against Iran, and South Korea has indicated it is considering a military contribution to help restore navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, as Washington pushes its allies to support its campaign against Tehran on both economic and military fronts.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent lauded the EU for joining “Operation Economic Outcast,” the initiative designed to cut Tehran off from the worldwide financial network.

“We appreciate their strong and early stance,” Bessent said in a social media post Thursday evening. “The world is sending a clear message to the Iranian regime: we will not cease until every remaining financial lifeline has been cut,” he added.

The remarks followed Brussels’ Aug. 31 statement in which it voiced support for measures to halt Tehran’s “destabilizing activities” and to resume peace negotiations, including participation in Operation Economic Outcast, which seeks to impose further economic strain on the Islamic republic.

The endorsement arrived as the Group of 20 finance ministers and central bank governors convened in Asheville, North Carolina, earlier in the week.

“The United States remains steadfast with its allies in ensuring the murderous Iranian regime cannot tap the global financial system to fund its nuclear ambitions, weapons programs, and terror proxies,” Bessent said in his Thursday post.

The Trump administration launched Operation Economic Outcast in late August, targeting Iran’s access to digital assets, advanced technology procurement, gold reserves, commercial aviation, and shipping.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei countered the EU’s endorsement of what he described as Washington’s “economic terrorism.” In a Sept. 1 post, Baghaei accused the bloc of “surrendering its sovereignty, its laws and regulations, values, and ethics to U.S. coercion.”

Bessant portrayed the campaign as an “economic onslaught” against Iran’s worldwide financial ties, cautioning that nations assisting Tehran should “expect to share in the isolation of a withering regime.” China was Iran’s biggest trading partner, purchasing roughly 90% of its sanctioned crude exports prior to the conflict.

Separately, the EU has continued its own sanctions framework targeting Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, as well as its military support for Russia.

Ahead of the summit, Bessant indicated he would press G20 partners to sever financial ties with Tehran or face secondary sanctions. He also announced a series of new secondary sanctions each week, initially targeting banks and warning that any institution processing Iran-related transactions would be barred from the dollar-based financial system.

Seoul weighs Hormuz role

Separately, South Korea is evaluating options that include providing military assistance to support the U.S. effort to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping, Reuters reported Friday, citing the presidential office.

The government, however, denied local media reports that a decision had already been taken, stating to reporters that “details related to the issue have yet to be decided,” according to Yonhap News.

Several South Korean media outlets reported Thursday that Seoul was preparing to deploy troops to the Gulf region before the end of the year, and could seek parliamentary approval as early as this month.

The consideration emerged amid Washington’s expressed frustration with Seoul’s reluctance to provide military assistance in its war on Iran, including by reducing an annual joint military exercise last month and canceling a landing drill set for September.

Standoff

Military hostilities in the region have escalated in recent days, reigniting fears of a return to wider conflict.

The U.S. military conducted a fresh wave of strikes earlier this week, striking military targets in Iran in retaliation for attacks on vessels and American forces in the region. Iran has responded by firing missiles at U.S. bases across the Middle East.

Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz—a vital corridor accounting for roughly a fifth of global oil flows before the conflict—remained muted, as Iran continued to launch intermittent attacks on vessels using the southern shipping lane near the Omani coast.

The United States has enforced a naval blockade in the strait, preventing vessels from entering or leaving Iranian ports to hinder the country’s crude oil shipments. U.S. Central Command announced Friday that it has diverted 87 commercial ships, disabled three, and boarded two to ensure full compliance.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Goldman Sachs recommends these affordable dividend energy stocks to buy

Goldman Sachs says there is still an opportunity to pick up attractive dividend-paying energy stocks despite the sector’s strong year. Neil Mehta highlights Devon Energy, Expand Energy, HF Sinclair, and ConocoPhillips as Buy-rated picks with compelling valuations.

Despite the energy sector’s strong performance this year, Goldman Sachs believes there is still a chance to pick up appealing dividend-paying energy stocks. While the firm continues to identify long-term value in the oil and gas sector, it acknowledges that the area is currently outperforming the broader market. The State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has climbed 45% year-to-date and reached a 52-week high on Thursday. By comparison, the S & P 500 is up 13% year to date. XLE YTD mountain State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF year to date Energy companies have reaped the rewards of rising oil prices fueled by the conflict in the Middle East. Brent crude futures settled above $95 per barrel. “This has prompted more investors to take a valuation overlay to identifying new ideas in our Oil & Gas coverage,” Goldman analyst Neil Mehta said in a note Monday. “For those screening for value, we screen our comparison sheets and identify Buy-rated stocks that currently offer above-average total return while trading at below-average 2028 multiples as investors position into year-end.” Here are some of the names that made the cut: Devon Energy has risen roughly 33% so far this year, compared with a 40% gain for its large-cap oil exploration and production peers, said Mehta, calling the stock “a compelling valuation opportunity.” “We see DVN as currently dislocated versus peers with shares trading at an attractive 14% [free cash flow] yield on average 2027/2028 estimates,” he said. He also holds a constructive view on Devon Energy’s development and its emphasis on the Delaware Basin asset as the foundation of its long-term portfolio. Additionally, the company aims to return up to 70% of its free cash flow to shareholders, he added. Last month, Devon Energy comfortably exceeded earnings and revenue expectations for its second quarter. It announced a dividend increase in May. Mehta’s $55 price target suggests 12% upside from Wednesday’s close. The stock offers a 2.3% dividend yield. Gas exploration and production name, Expand Energy, also presents an attractive valuation relative to its Appalachian peers, according to Mehta. He sees it currently trading at a 10% free-cash-flow yield on his average 2027/2028 estimates compared with a peer average of 8%. Expand Energy, which yields 2.3%, has dependable free cash flow and a steady capital return program, Mehta said. Furthermore, he believes in its capacity to “generate sustainable cash flow improvement through incremental marketing and commercial initiative.” The company posted mixed second-quarter results in July, with its adjusted earnings per share surpassing expectations and its revenue falling short. Shares are down roughly 10% so far in 2026. U.S. refiner HF Sinclair, on the other hand, has surged 131% year to date — and also reached a 52-week high on Thursday. Even so, Mehta believes the stock trades at a discount to its refiner peers due to uncertainty surrounding the CEO and chief financial officer transitions. Both positions are currently interim. “[W]e continue to see value in the company’s non-refining earnings contributions (Lubricants, Renewable Diesel, and Midstream) in addition to the company’s leverage to niche refining markets (West Coast/Rockies and Mid-Continent),” Mehta wrote. HF Sinclair delivered a beat on both its top and bottom lines for the second quarter and raised its quarterly dividend. The stock currently yields about 2%. Mehta’s $114 price target implies 7.5% upside from Wednesday’s close. Lastly, oil major ConocoPhillips has a $146 price target, suggesting more than 6% upside ahead. Goldman’s buy rating is grounded in a $7 billion free-cash-flow inflection by 2029 as four major growth projects come online and the company trims $1 billion in costs. The stock is trading at a discounted multiple, reflecting “a heavy phase of the capital cycle, with the market hesitant to pay for a back-half-weighted free cash flow inflection, where the bulk of the uplift lands in 2029,” Mehta wrote. ConocoPhillips has gained 45% year to date, hitting a 52-week high on Thursday. It currently yields 2.5%.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media