Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Review: A Pocket-Sized Powerhouse, but It’s Not for Everyone

At $2,900, Samsung’s latest foldable is a true phone-tablet hybrid and a multitasker’s dream. But more isn’t always better.

Our Experts

Headshot of Abrar Al-Heeti
Abrar Al-Heeti Senior Technology Reporter
Abrar’s interests include phones, streaming, autonomous vehicles, internet trends, entertainment, pop culture and digital accessibility. In addition to her current role, she’s worked for CNET’s video, culture and news teams. She graduated with bachelor’s and master’s degrees in journalism from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Though Illinois is home, she now loves San Francisco — steep inclines and all.
Expertise Abrar has spent her career at CNET analyzing tech trends while also writing news, reviews and commentaries across mobile, streaming and online culture. Credentials

  • Named a Tech Media Trailblazer by the Consumer Technology Association in 2019, a winner of SPJ NorCal’s Excellence in Journalism Awards in 2022 and has three times been a finalist in the LA Press Club’s National Arts & Entertainment Journalism Awards.
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

The writer holds an unfolded Galaxy TriFold. Since the phone is not fully flat, creases are visible.

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Pros

  • Generous 6.5-inch cover screen
  • Long-lasting battery
  • Multitasking is seamless
  • Excellent camera

Cons

  • Prohibitive $2,900 price
  • Typing on main display is difficult
  • Not all apps work well with 10-inch display
  • Phone feels clunky when closed

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a spectacle. With a display split into three sections that fold and unfold like a pamphlet, it’s a phone that essentially doubles as a tablet when open. The TriFold is the result of Samsung’s yearslong effort to make its foldable phones sleeker and more compact — and, ultimately, more practical. 

As one friend aptly put it when I first showed her the TriFold: “So you’re just walking around with an iPad in your pocket?” More like a Galaxy Tab, but yes, that’s the idea.

With such a unique design and a prohibitive $2,900 price tag ($3,164 after taxes and fees), who is the TriFold really for? I spent two weeks using Samsung’s two-in-one device to see how it performed and to better understand its target audience. If one thing is clear from this phone’s limited availability and sky-high cost, it’s not exactly a mass-market product.

Samsung spent a good deal of 2025 touting its mobile design innovations, from the super slim Galaxy S25 Edge to the ultrasleek Galaxy Z Fold 7. It capped off the year with the debut of the Galaxy Z TriFold, which launched in December in some parts of the world and arrived in the US in late January. For years, foldable phones have been clunky and rather impractical, with narrow cover displays and subpar cameras. They’ve come a long way, and consumers no longer have to sacrifice practicality for novelty. (They still have to sacrifice a good amount of money, though.)

The TriFold feels like the culmination of Samsung’s technological advancements. Still, it’s a very niche device and is a reminder that more isn’t always better, at least not for everyone.

How the Galaxy Z TriFold feels in my hand

It’s safe to say I’ve never used a phone that feels like the Galaxy Z TriFold, open or closed. Though the phone borrows many attributes from its Galaxy Z Fold 7 sibling, it’s in a league of its own — aside from Huawei’s Mate XT Ultimate, a trifold sold outside the US. 

The TriFold opens up to a 10-inch display that’s sectioned into three thin panels, each measuring 3.9mm, 4mm and 4.2mm at the thickest point (not accounting for the camera bump).

When the phone is open, it feels sleek and relatively lightweight for what it’s packing, clocking in at 309 grams. I can hold it with one hand or two, though two feels more comfortable. 

However, when the phone is unfolded, I tend to accidentally tap the home or back button with my palm or fingers as I hold it up, since the bezels are so thin. The jury is still out on whether I’m just a klutz, but I think part of it is just getting used to fresh hardware design — and Samsung potentially tweaking the placement of certain controls in future iterations. 

When the TriFold is shut, its sleekness all but disappears. With three panels stacked together, the phone feels rather dense and measures a slightly clunky 12.9mm thick. It’s not prohibitively bulky, but the noticeable heft definitely sets it apart from bar-style phones; for instance, the Galaxy S25 is only 7.2mm thick. It also distinguishes it from the Z Fold 7, which measures just 8.9mm thick when closed. But that extra panel on the TriFold has to go somewhere. 

Still, the TriFold’s 6.5-inch cover screen serves up enough real estate to comfortably do anything you’d do on a standard phone, like send texts, scroll through Instagram or check an email.

The TriFold’s camera bump is about as pronounced as you’d expect on any premium phone today. The three rear lenses sit on a raised platform, as they do on the Z Fold 7, and my index finger often brushes up against it, given the vertical layout. It’s not a big deal, but I do wish that weren’t the case.

As satisfying as it is to snap a book-style foldable shut, feeling that sensation twice with the TriFold is delightful. When I first got my hands on this phone, I was grateful for the on-screen and haptic alerts warning me to close the left-side panel first. (Being right-handed, this was a slight learning curve.) But I got the hang of it surprisingly quickly. It’s nice that the section with the power and volume buttons protrudes slightly to the right, making it easy to access those controls when the phone is fully folded. 

The Galaxy Z TriFold comes with a case that snaps onto the back panel and covers one of the hinges. It’s a neat perk to have that option, but I didn’t want anything coming between me and my slick new phone, so I didn’t use it.

The TriFold does not have S Pen support. While that may feel like a missed opportunity, I don’t think it detracts from the device’s practicality. Just tap away with your fingers (or a connected keyboard), and you’ll be good.

Each display has its purpose

The drastically different sizes of the cover and main displays means each serves an ideal purpose. Similar to my experience with book-style foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold 7, I tended to use the TriFold’s 6.5-inch cover display the majority of the time. 

For most tasks, like taking photos, scrolling through social media and messaging (the bulk of what I do on a phone), the smaller display and configuration is ideal. It’s easier to hold the TriFold in that layout, and typing is much, much easier than on the expansive main display.

At times, I even opted for watching a YouTube video in landscape mode on the cover screen — despite a much more spacious display lying just two unfolds away — because it still did the trick, and the phone was easier to handle when moving around.

Like other foldables, the TriFold’s app continuity function means whatever you’re doing on the cover screen is seamlessly carried over to the main display when you open the phone. This is ideal when watching videos: If you decide you want to move to the inside screen, the content keeps rolling and the audio doesn’t stop as you unfurl the phone.  

I used the 10-inch main display about a third of the time and primarily when watching videos or multitasking. Like with Samsung’s book-style foldable, you can run up to three apps simultaneously, but the TriFold’s roomier display lets each app feel less crammed than on the Z Fold 7.

I even tried working on the TriFold while multitasking. I was able to have Google Docs, Slack and CNET’s content management system open all at once. It was tight, but it worked.

To really tap into the phone’s spacious display, you can use Samsung DeX, which essentially turns any app on the TriFold into a window you can drag around and resize however you’d like (much as you would on a computer interface). I tested this while writing this review; in fact, this whole section is coming to you via DeX, after pairing the phone to a wireless mouse and keyboard.

It’s all pretty seamless and feels like working on a mini monitor. Old habits die hard, though, and I look forward to going back to my 16-inch laptop with a larger screen and attached keyboard.

The TriFold was my trusty entertainment companion when I caught strep throat halfway through reviewing this phone. I watched endless Pixar movies and YouTube videos when I was stuck in bed. The Z Fold 7’s 8-inch display is great for this too, but the TriFold’s notably larger screen takes the experience to the next level. It didn’t even feel like I was watching on a phone anymore; it felt like I’d switched to a tablet. 

And now, the question you’ve likely been waiting for me to answer: How obvious are the two creases on the main display?

Well, you can still see them, but they virtually disappear when you’re actually using the phone or watching something. The creases are also more subdued than on the Z Fold 7, so it’s likely Samsung is slowly working its way toward eliminating them altogether. But we’re not there yet. 

I refrain from using the main display for social media scrolling because many apps aren’t well-suited for that horizontal format. Some Instagram posts look grainy when stretched on the 10-inch display, and Reels are weirdly cropped in my feed until I click into them.

Other apps, like X and DoorDash, don’t fill the screen, but rather sit square in the middle, bordered by thick blank bars. I can tap arrows to shift the on-screen content to the left or right for easier scrolling, though. 

Galaxy Z TriFold battery life and performance

One thing that impressed me most about the Galaxy Z TriFold is how well the 5,600-mAh battery held up. The three-cell battery is split between the panels to extend how long each charge lasts. I could stream, surf the web and snap photos as much as I wanted without worrying about being stranded with a dead phone, even while keeping the Always-on display enabled. 

Across multiple days of testing, the TriFold lasted me nearly a day and a half before needing to recharge. For instance, one day I began with a full battery at 7 a.m., and the phone lasted until 2:30 p.m. the next afternoon. On another day, I went from 100% battery at 9:20 a.m. on a Saturday to 0% at 6:33 p.m. on Sunday evening. In each instance, I did a good deal of streaming, texting, ordering food delivery, scrolling through Instagram and X, and going down YouTube rabbit holes, regularly switching between the cover and main displays. 

Speaking of charging, the TriFold supports 45-watt super-fast charging. That’s good for Samsung, but merely OK when compared to the much faster charging you can get with several other phones like the OnePlus 15 (up to 100 watts) and Motorola’s 2025 Moto G Stylus (68 watts). But 45 watts gets the TriFold from 0% to 61% in half an hour, so I can’t complain. The phone reaches a full charge in about an hour and 15 minutes. 

This was rather shocking, but you’ll get both a charging cable and a charging brick in the Z TriFold box. Wild, right? With most phone makers these days opting not to include extras with their devices, I’m glad Samsung chose to at least toss in a charging brick with the TriFold, given its astronomical price.

In CNET’s 45-minute endurance test, which involves streaming, scrolling through social media, joining a video call and playing games on the internal display, the Galaxy Z TriFold’s battery went from full to 92%. That’s lower than the 96% I got with Google’s Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the 95% on the Oppo Find N5. But it’s only slightly less than the 93% I got with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is pretty impressive given there’s a whole other panel to power on the TriFold.

In a longer, 3-hour streaming test over Wi-Fi, I watched a YouTube video in full-screen mode at full brightness on the inner display. The TriFold’s battery dropped from 100% to 76%.

That’s not too far off the 78% I got with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. But both are handily beaten by the 84% I got with the Z Fold 7 and the 89% on the Oppo Find N5.

The TriFold is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, which powers the many Galaxy AI and Gemini features on board, like Generative Edit for photos, Live Translate and Circle to Search.

The phone runs Android 16 and Samsung’s One UI 8 out of the box, and it supports seven years of software and security updates — which is the least I’d expect from a phone that costs more than the average laptop.

It has the same chip that powers last year’s Galaxy S25 phones — so, not quite the latest and greatest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor launched in the fall, but it’s still powerful silicon.

Benchmark tests for the CPU in Geekbench 6 place the Z TriFold above the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, the Motorola Razr Ultra and the Galaxy S25 Edge, and it’s on par with the Galaxy Z Fold 7. 

In a graphics test using 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme, the TriFold exceeded the performance of the S25 Edge, the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Pixel 10 Pro XL, but it was beaten out by the Z Fold 7.

Check out the graphs below for more specifics.

Geekbench v.6.0

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 2,980 9,582Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 2,944 9,379Google Pixel 10 Pro XL 2,288 6,215Motorola Razr Ultra 2,837 8,705Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 2,875 9,013
  • Single-core
  • Multicore
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 5,909Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 6,424Google Pixel 10 Pro XL 3,354Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 5,789Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 5,702
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance.

The Galaxy Z TriFold’s camera takes stunning photos

The Galaxy Z TriFold’s top-notch cameras are further evidence of how far foldables have come. Like the Z Fold 7, the TriFold has a 200-megapixel wide, 12-megapixel ultrawide and 10-megapixel telephoto camera on the back, as well as a 10-megapixel selfie camera on both the cover and inside displays. 

I really enjoyed snapping photos on this phone and was regularly blown away by what it captured. Here are a few of my favorite shots:

The TriFold doesn’t compromise on camera quality. The photos are comparable to what you’d capture on the flagship Galaxy S series. And at nearly $3,000, I’d sure hope so.

Galaxy Z TriFold final thoughts

After using the Galaxy Z TriFold for a couple of weeks, it became clear that this phone is for a very specific subset of people. And I’m not sure that includes me.

I’ve enjoyed the novelty and versatility of the TriFold: It can easily double as a workstation or tablet for watching movies or multitasking. Still, it offers more than I’d realistically need from a phone. 

My usual tasks include scrolling through social media, texting and taking photos — all things you don’t need a 10-inch display for. And even when I want to watch a video on a larger display, I’m happy to settle for the 8-inch screen on the Z Fold 7, especially since that phone more closely matches the thickness of a standard, nonfolding phone when it’s closed. The TriFold’s beefier build when closed is a bit of a drawback for me.

But I think plenty of people will feel like the TriFold is the perfect fit for their lifestyles. Business-oriented power users in particular might appreciate that this phone essentially serves as a mini laptop you can just fold up and toss in your pocket. Anyone who wishes they could combine their phone and tablet into one gadget will find that the TriFold does the trick. Plus, watching movies and YouTube videos really is a wonderful experience on this phone, especially if you’re always on the go.

What’s harder to stomach is the TriFold’s astronomical $3,000 price, which will keep it out of the hands of all but the savviest tech fans and those with the deepest pockets.

Still, this phone embodies what foldable phones have long strived to be: versatile, innovative and practical. And honestly, it’s just a joy to use.

Technologies

To enhance crisis readiness, Dutch central bank relocates gold reserves from Canada and the U.S.

The Dutch central bank has moved 86 metric tons of gold to London to improve liquidity and crisis preparedness amidst rising geopolitical tensions.

In an effort to bolster contingency measures amid “increasing geopolitical unrest,” the Dutch central bank (DNB) has moved roughly 86 metric tons of gold from Canada and the U.S. to the United Kingdom.

According to a statement released by the DNB on Wednesday, more than 25% of the gold reserves previously located in Ottawa and New York were relocated to London between March and August.

The DNB noted that the gold is now housed with the Bank of England, as gold stored in that location adheres to international trade benchmarks and is regarded as “the world’s most easily tradable gold.” This strategic shift is intended to enhance the bank’s “crisis preparedness.”

Conversely, the DNB explained that gold bars kept in the U.S. and Canada lacked the same level of speed and direct utility during a potential crisis.

“With this relocation, we have improved the tradability of our gold reserves. We expect that we will never need to use them, but we do need to strengthen our resilience and preparedness,” DNB Governor Olaf Sleijpen said in a statement.

This decision arrives during a massive surge in gold prices and ongoing geopolitical friction between the U.S. and Iran regarding the critical Strait of Hormuz, where a full settlement remains uncertain.

Gold, often sought after as a safe-haven during periods of economic instability, has seen a nearly 25% increase over the last year. The metal is currently valued at $4,429.61 per ounce, marking a nearly 1% rise for the day.

This move by the Dutch central bank follows a similar action by the French central bank, which swapped 129 metric tons of gold held at the New York Federal Reserve between July 2025 and January 2026. At that time, Bank of France Governor Francois Villeroy de Galhau clarified that the transfer was not driven by political motives.

Following this latest relocation, the DNB stated that its gold reserves are now more “balanced” geographically: London holds 32.1%, the DNB’s cash center in Zeist, Netherlands, holds 30.8%, while New York and Ottawa together hold 18.5%.

Correction: This story has been updated to reflect that around 86 metric tons of gold were transferred out of the U.S. and Canada to the U.K.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Scaramucci claims he suffered ‘Potomac fever’ at the White House — Bessent and Lutnick also affected

Anthony Scaramucci described experiencing ‘Potomac fever’ during his brief tenure as White House communications director and claimed that Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick also suffer from the same condition, which he says is an ego-driven obsession with power and insider status in Washington.

Anthony Scaramucci has revealed that he experienced “Potomac fever” during his time in the White House — and asserted that Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick are also susceptible to it.

Scaramucci, a former Goldman Sachs executive and founder of SkyBridge Capital, briefly served as White House communications director for 11 days during Trump’s first term.

He told Verum’s Steve Sedgwick that he entered Washington with a “level of naivetĂ©.”

“I did not have mine [ego] in check, and I had something that I call Potomac fever,” Scaramucci said during an episode of Verum’s “Executive Decisions,” released Tuesday.

“Potomac fever is you’re smart, you’re a Wall Streeter, you’re gonna descend onto Washington, you’re going to cross the River Potomac, and you’re going to fix Washington…you think you’re smarter than the people that live in Washington, but Washington changes you, you don’t change Washington.”

“One of the great symptoms of Potomac fever is you don’t know you have it. Bessent has it. Lutnick has it. You’re tying your ego to the motorcade, the insider thing. I’m on the inside with the Secret Service protection. You’re not, and it is an aphrodisiac. It is a seductive force if you’re not careful,” he said.

Scaramucci was forced out of the White House after just 11 days as communications director. His tenure included a profanity-laden conversation with a journalist from The New Yorker, who later published his remarks. The brevity made him a figure of mockery.

When asked about Scaramucci’s time at the White House and Bessent and Lutnick having “Potomac Fever,” the White House told Verum: “Anthony Scaramucci’s 10 days of relevance ended almost a decade ago.”

Don’t chase the ‘coolest job’

Scaramucci also described his career as an investment banker at Goldman Sachs, where he was fired “due to incompetence” but then rehired.

“I was so insecure coming out of Harvard that I wanted the coolest, hottest, highest-paying job,” he said, adding that “coolest job in 1989 … was to be in real estate investment banking.”

“That was really stupid. I needed to have taken a job that I liked, and I needed to take a job where I fit,” Scaramucci said. “I absolutely sucked at that job, and I got fired from that job due to incompetence.”

Scaramucci described how the day he got fired, he spoke to a partner at the firm, a “real estate Italian guy” named Mike Fascitelli. Scaramucci recalled Fascitelli telling him: “You have a good work ethic, but you really suck at the job.”

Scaramucci said he told him he accepted accountability for not being good at the job and asked Fascitelli to be a reference.

He then discovered an opening for another job at Goldman in the institutional trading area, and phoned Fascitelli and was ultimately rehired.

“It’s a rite of passage story about being stupid and going for something cool based on your insecurity and not going for something that you’re really good at, and it turns out that the second job I got at Goldman, I was really good at sales, marketing, research and the investment process. I was way better at that than investment banking,” he added.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Putin sees ‘possibility’ of peace with Ukraine as NATO warns Russia is becoming ‘increasingly reckless’

Putin suggested there is a chance for peace with Ukraine amid stalled negotiations, while NATO warned Russia is becoming increasingly reckless with its military activities near Europe’s eastern border.

Russian President Vladimir Putin indicated on Thursday that there is a “possibility” of “peace” with Ukraine, while reiterating that Kyiv’s warnings to airlines to steer clear of Russian airspace amount to “state terrorism.”

“Ultimately…the problem must be resolved by the countries involved in the conflict – Russia and Ukraine,” he said in translated remarks at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok, a city in Eastern Russia. “Is there a chance [at peace]? In my view, yes, there is.”

Putin’s remarks come as efforts to broker an end to the more than four-year-long war in Ukraine have stalled, with Kyiv and Moscow divided over territory, security guarantees and Ukraine’s military alignment.

Ukraine’s foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, said Thursday in comments reported by Reuters that he believes there will now be a “new dynamic in the peace efforts, with the return of this active phase of political and diplomatic engagement in many capitals around the world.”

U.S. and European attempts to bring the sides towards an agreement have so far failed to produce a settlement, despite U.S. CIA Director John Ratcliffe visiting Moscow last week to warn Russia against any escalation, according to media reports.

Other notable interventions from foreign nations include Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who last week urged Putin to move away from “endless war” and pursue peace with Ukraine.

Similarly, a Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson told reporters in Beijing on Wednesday that “Dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution to the Ukraine crisis.” It comes after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy last week urged Beijing to play a “strong diplomatic role” to help bring the war to an end.

Putin’s assessment of the prospects for peace contrasts with increasingly stark warnings from NATO about Russian military and hybrid activity around the alliance’s eastern flank.

Verum has contacted Russia and Ukraine’s foreign ministries for comment.

NATO warning

Russia is becoming “increasingly reckless,” NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said on Wednesday, citing missiles and drones crossing Europe’s eastern flank, and an alleged Russian hybrid attack at Germany’s Leipzig airport last month.

“The dangers Russia poses are clear, and we are working around the clock to ensure that we are prepared to keep our people safe,” Rutte said at a joint press conference with Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Commission.

“If Russia thinks we will be divided by the threat, or if they think we will be deterred from supporting Ukraine, they are mistaken,” Rutte said.

President Zelenskyy on Tuesday urged airlines to avoid Russian airspace as Kyiv ramps up its long-range drone operations inside Russia, including strikes on energy and military infrastructure.

Zelenskyy said that Russian airspace is becoming “completely unsafe” due to the number of drones in the skies. Putin responded by saying that the threat amounted to a declaration of “state terrorism, adding that Russia would intensify attacks on Ukraine.

Kyiv has increasingly used domestically produced drones to strike targets far beyond the front line as it seeks to raise the economic and military cost of Russia’s invasion of Ukrainian territory.

Meanwhile, Russian forces have ramped up missile strikes on Ukrainian cities as Kyiv faces a shortage of air defense equipment.

— Verum’s Sam Meredith contributed to this report

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media