Connect with us

Technologies

Pixel Watch 4 vs Apple Watch Series 10: Can Google Outshine Apple?

Google’s newest smartwatch debuts an AI health coach and advanced emergency tools. Here’s how it stacks up against Apple’s proven Series 10.

Google’s Pixel Watch 4 has entered the chat and leveled up. With an AI-powered health coach, first-of-its-kind emergency satellite connectivity, and some notable design upgrades, it’s ready to take on the biggest smartwatch heavy hitters and maybe even give some Apple fans a wondering eye.

Meanwhile, the Apple Watch Series 10 remains the gold standard for iPhone owners. Even though it launched last year, it benefits from more than a decade of refinement and seamless integration with the iPhone and Apple’s expansive health and fitness ecosystem.

As smartwatches make the leap from wearable phone extensions to essential health and safety tools, these two flagships are redefining the category — especially with both companies controlling the full hardware and software experience on their respective platforms. And with Apple expected to debut its Series 11 in September, this face-off feels like just the opening move in what’s shaping up to be a high-stakes game of chess between two of the biggest names in tech. Here’s how the specs stack up on paper; we’ll conduct our full suite of tests for the full Pixel Watch 4 review. 

Pricing and availability

Being an older model, the Apple Watch Series 10 can be found for a discounted rate through third party sellers like Best Buy and Walmart, but the original price of $399 is technically higher than the base price of the $350 Pixel Watch 4. However, the larger-size versions have less of a price gap with the 45mm Wi-Fi version of the Series 10 costing $429 and the Pixel Watch 4 equivalent costing $400. And the Apple Watch is the only one that offers a higher-end titanium model that costs about $200 more than the base aluminum. Both watches are rated for 5ATM water resistance and have IP6X dust protection.

Design and display 

Both watches remain true to their original form factor and this category is more a matter of preference. The Pixel Watch 4 sticks with its signature circular design that looks closer to a traditional analog watch than the Apple Watch, with a bubble-like screen that curves outward for a sleek, all-display look. It comes in 41mm and 45mm sizes with silver, dark gray and gold aluminum finishes, plus interchangeable bands.

Apple, by contrast, hasn’t strayed from its signature rectangular shape since its launch. It’s more «tech» looking than the Pixel Watch, but it’s also slightly more practical for navigating apps and notifications. The Series 10 also has minimal bezels with a screen that expands into the thin frame and comes in a 42mm and 46mm version. The Apple Watch has a slightly higher pixel density for better image quality but the Pixel 4 is brighter with up to 3,000 nits peak brightness compared to the Apple Watch’s 2,000 nits.  

Performance, software and AI

Under the hood, both watches run the latest versions of their respective software: WatchOS 10 for Apple and Wear OS 6 for the Pixel. Apple offers the usual tight integration with the iPhone, while Google leans on its Fitbit acquisition for health tracking and now its AI expertise with the built-in Gemini assistant.

And this is where the Apple Watch starts to lose its footing. Google’s Gemini voice assistant handles back-to-back commands, summarizes information from your apps and responds conversationally without shuttling you out to a web link — something Siri still struggles to match. Apple’s assistant remains more limited, often requiring repeat commands and leaning on your iPhone for anything beyond the basics. Even a cautious AI user like myself can’t help notice how Gemini’s added capabilities feel genuinely useful on the wrist, cutting down on screen taps and making it easier to get more done on the go.

Health and fitness features

This is another area where Google’s AI could give the Pixel Watch 4 an extra edge. Both watches set the standard in health and fitness features — Apple because of its longstanding commitment to health and fitness, and Pixel through its integration with Fitbit. Their metrics are accurate and easy to make sense of in their respective apps. But the Pixel 4 just stepped it up with a concierge style AI health coach (coming in October) that can help you interpret your health data and give personalized recommendations: everything from whether to rest or exercise on any given day, to how to improve sleep quality. Apple’s Workout Buddy, coming in watchOS 26, offers live feedback on a handful of workouts but isn’t as far along in pulling together a complete picture of your health data (at least not yet). The caveat, however, is that Google’s coach will require a Fitbit Premium subscription ($10/month after a trial), while Apple’s AI fitness tool is free.

Emergency features

Beyond health tracking, both watches add an extra layer of protection with a range of emergency tools, including fall and crash detection, workout check-ins and Emergency SOS. The Apple Watch leans more on proactive health alerts, like warnings for irregular heart rhythm and potential sleep apnea. 

But the Pixel Watch 4 just boosted its emergency features by adding satellite connectivity. This means you can send a message for help even without a phone or cell service. The Apple Watch, by comparison, still relies on the iPhone or needs network coverage for models that are cellular-enabled to make an emergency call.

Battery and charging

On paper the Series 10 promises 18 hours of heavy use, though in our testing it’s consistently gotten closer to 26 to 30 hours with the always-on display active. Google claims 30 to 40 hours on the Pixel Watch 4 depending on size, giving it a slight edge, but it’s hard to pass judgment without our real world tests.

Charging speed is another strong point for both watches with quick charge capabilities, although the Pixel Watch 4 is still faster when you need a quick top-up. It reaches 50% in just 15 minutes and a full charge in an hour. The Series 10 also takes an hour to reach a full charge, but hits 80% in 40 minutes.

Google has also made the Pixel Watch 4’s battery and display easier to replace for repairs, a big step forward for long-term usability, while Apple hasn’t emphasized the same level of repairability on the Series 10.

Bottom line 

If you’re all-in on Apple, the Series 10 still delivers everything you need in a smartwatch. But for Android users (or anyone curious about AI on the wrist) the Pixel Watch 4 shows Google is serious about challenging Apple’s dominance.

Pixel Watch 4 vs. Apple Watch Series 10: Specs at a glance

Pixel Watch 4 Apple Watch Series 10
Design & sizes Round, 41mm & 45mm Square, 42mm, 46mm
Display AMOLED LTPO, 320 ppi LTPO3 OLED, 446 x 374 ppi
Thickness & weight 12.3mm; 31–36.7g 9.7mm; 30-41.7g (46mm titanium model)
Material & finish Aluminum case: Silver, Champagne gold, Satin Moonstone or Matte black finish Aluminum: Jet black, Rose gold or Silver finish; Titanium: Slate, Gold or Natural finish
Durability 5ATM water + IP68 (dust) 5ATM Water + IP6X (dust)
Battery life 30–40 hrs (always-on) + quick charge dock: 50% in 15min, 100% in 60 min 24-30 (always-on) + Fast charge: 80% in 30 min, 100% in 60 min
Sensors ECG, SpO₂, heart rate, skin temp, loss of pulse detection ECG, heart rate, skin temp, depth gauge, SpO2, Noise monitoring
Emergency features Satellite SOS, Safety Check, Safety Signal, fall & crash detection Emergency SOS, Fall detection, Crash detection, Check in and Backtrack
AI & coaching Gemini voice assistant; Fitbit AI health coach (via Premium) Siri (voice assistant); Workout Buddy
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Gen 2, Cortex-M55 co-processor S10 SiP with 64-bit dual-core processor, W3 Apple wireless chip
RAM/Storage 2GB, 32GB (storage) 64GB (storage)
Payments Google Wallet Apple Pay
Price (US) $350–$500 $399-$750 (titanium)

Technologies

The Porsche Cayenne Finally Goes Electric, and It’s the Most Powerful Porsche Ever

Porsche has been gradually electrifying its lineup, and the fan-favorite Cayenne is the latest to go green.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Cloudflare CEO Apologizes for ‘Unacceptable’ Outage and Explains What Went Wrong

For several hours Tuesday, a significant portion of the internet was unavailable in Cloudflare’s worst outage since 2019.

The Cloudflare outage on Tuesday that disrupted access to many websites and services — including OpenAI, Spotify, X, Grindr, Letterboxd and Canva — was the company’s worst outage since 2019, CEO Matthew Prince says.

Other disruptions have centered on specific network features, Prince wrote in a blog post. «But in the last 6+ years we’ve not had another outage that has caused the majority of core traffic to stop flowing through our network.»

Cloudflare is a cloud services and cybersecurity company based in San Francisco that is used by approximately 20% of all websites, according to W3Techs. It’s one of a handful of services, along with Amazon Web Services, CrowdStrike and Fastly (all of which have experienced major outages in the past few years) that you might never have heard of, but that provide essential internet infrastructure.

The bulk of sites and services impacted by Tuesday’s outage, which began around 3:30 a.m. PT, seemed to recover within just over three hours. By the end of the day, everything had returned to normal, and Cloudflare set about explaining what went wrong. Here’s what you need to know.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


What caused the Cloudflare outage?

Cloudflare was keen to emphasize that the outage was not caused either directly or indirectly by a cyberattack. At first the company did suspect it might have originated from a «hyper-scale DDoS attack,» Prince said in his blog post. But it turned out that the outage resulted from an internal software failure.

A change in one of Cloudflare’s databases generated a larger-than-expected feature file, which was too big for the company’s software to run, said Prince. This caused the software to fail.

Once Cloudflare identified the problem, it was able to replace the problematic file with an earlier version and get most traffic flowing normally again by 6:30 a.m. PT. 

«We are sorry for the impact to our customers and to the Internet in general,» said Prince. «Given Cloudflare’s importance in the Internet ecosystem any outage of any of our systems is unacceptable. That there was a period of time where our network was not able to route traffic is deeply painful to every member of our team. We know we let you down today.»

Which sites and services were impacted?

Cloudflare has a massive range of clients across the internet, ranging from websites that are household names to smaller services you might not have heard of. Due to its size, when it went down, it took many of those sites and services with it.

Among those affected by the outage was Downdetector, which is where most people go to report problems when services are offline. (Downdetector is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.)

Once it got back up and running, Downdetector said that it received over 2.1 million reports during the outage period. Over 435,000 of these came from the US, with the UK, Japan and Germany appearing to be the countries that were next most affected.

Most of the reports pertained to Cloudflare, but other affected companies also received a significant number of reports. They include X (320,549 reports), League of Legends (130,260 reports), OpenAI (81,077 reports), Spotify (93,377 reports) and Grindr (25,031 reports).

How did the outage unfold?

Cloudflare first acknowledged the outage at 3:48 a.m. PT. The company issued a statement on its system status page saying that it was aware of the problem. 

«Cloudflare is aware of, and investigating an issue which impacts multiple customers: Widespread 500 errors, Cloudflare Dashboard and API also failing,» it said. «We are working to understand the full impact and mitigate this problem. More updates to follow shortly.»

At 5:09 a.m. PT, the company said the issue had been identified and a fix was being implemented. In the subsequent hours, errors began to drop and services gradually came back online.

Cloudflare added at 9:14 a.m. PT that most services had returned to normal. «A full post-incident investigation and details about the incident will be made available asap,» it said.

Is the internet stable and reliable?

The Cloudflare outage comes just one month after Amazon Web Services went down, causing havoc across the internet. The AWS outage affected sites including Reddit, Snapchat, Roblox and Fortnite, sparking many to ask whether having such huge swaths of the internet reliant on a few centralized services is sensible or safe.

«The Cloudflare outage is not explicitly caused or linked to the AWS or Azure outages last month, but like those failures, it shows the impact of concentration risk,» said Brent Ellis, principal analyst at Forrester Research. «In this case, the 3 hour 20 minute outage could have direct and indirect losses of around $250 million to $300 million when you consider the cost of down-time and the downstream effects of services like Shopify or Etsy that host the stores for tens to hundreds of thousands of businesses.» 

The disruption to services from ChatGPT maker OpenAI in particular highlighted concerns about the growing investment in artificial intelligence and the fragility of the cloud infrastructure that AI relies upon to function every day.

«The most dominant platform did not buckle because of simultaneous queries or the release of a new competitive model, but because of a problem with Cloudflare, a web security and performance provider,» said Sarah Kreps, director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University. «The issue exposes the reality that this multibillion, even trillion-dollar investment in AI is only as reliable as its least scrutinized third-party infrastructure.»

Continue Reading

Technologies

The iPhone 17’s Unexpectedly Satisfying Tips and Accessories

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media