Technologies
iPhone 14 Pro vs. Galaxy S23 Ultra: My Thoughts After Ditching Android
I wanted see how Samsung’s top-of-the-line phone compares to my iPhone 14 Pro. Do I regret switching to Apple?
This story is part of Samsung Event, CNET’s collection of news, tips and advice around Samsung’s most popular products.
Five months ago, I went from being a die-hard Samsung Galaxy fan to a sellout iPhone owner. Since then, I’ve fully adapted to the world of Apple and have been basking in the perks of features like AirDrop and iMessage (mostly to the delight of my friends, who were sick of my green texts).Â
But I still have a soft spot for Galaxy phones, and when Samsung unveiled the S23 lineup in February, I was eager to see how the top-of-the-line S23 Ultra would compare to my iPhone 14 Pro. So I got my hands on one and began using the phones side by side to compare everything from the cameras to battery life to overall design — and to see whether I’d have any regrets about switching to the “dark side.” Here’s what I found.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s display vs. Apple’s Super Retina screen
First things first: I have an iPhone 14 Pro, and not a Pro Max, so the Ultra’s massive screen definitely stands out in comparison. I never feel like I need a bigger screen than what I get on my 14 Pro, but it definitely doesn’t hurt to have that larger display when I’m watching a YouTube video or streaming a show — or spending too much time on TikTok.Â
The trade-off to having that larger screen is trying to fit it in my pocket and having to carry something a bit bulkier. Still, it’s a pretty sleek phone for all that real estate. Â
The display quality on both phones is stellar, and I don’t see much of a quality difference between the two. Right out of the box, the S23 Ultra has a nice bright display, which you can achieve on the iPhone by turning off True Tone (a feature that adjusts the color and intensity of your display depending on your environment). If the brightness on the Ultra is too much, you can inversely mimic the effects of True Tone by going into Display settings and either toggling on Eye comfort shield or going to Screen mode and selecting Natural. You can also play with the White balance scale. Images on the iPhone look slightly sharper, but colors pop a bit more on the S23 Ultra. Overall, though, there’s really not much of a difference between the phones.

The keyboard on the Galaxy S23 Ultra (right) places numbers above letters, so you don’t have to hop between the two.
John Kim/CNETThere’s one aspect to having an iPhone that I haven’t quite made peace with yet, and it’s the keyboard. I’m glad Apple added Slide to Type with iOS 13 a few years ago, followed by haptic feedback on the keyboard with iOS 16 (finally), because those are features I loved on Android. But I still get frustrated that I have to switch between numbers and letters when I’m typing on the iPhone. Meanwhile, on the Galaxy, the numbers sit just above the letters, so you can select them more quickly, the way you would on a laptop keyboard. You can download different keyboards on the iPhone like Gboard, but it’s not the same. I’ll admit that’s a minor complaint, but I do think the user experience would benefit from Apple taking a page from Android’s book — you know, like they’ve done many times before. Moving onâŠ.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s battery life is next level


The battery that keeps going.
James Martin/CNETI’ve had my iPhone for a few months now and thankfully haven’t seen any noticeable drops in battery life yet. My phone still lasts a full day of heavy use, but I always need to charge at the end of the day.
The Ultra’s battery is next level. I can go a full day of use and still have some juice left over. That’s not surprising, given the S23 Ultra has a 5,000-mAh battery. Apple doesn’t share battery capacity for its phones, but says the 14 Pro has up to 23 hours of video playback. An iFixit teardown found the iPhone 14 Pro has a 3,200-mAh battery.Â
Even though the Ultra has a bigger battery, Apple is actually able to crank out more efficiency from its batteries thanks to iOS and its own A-series chips. Meanwhile, Android has to work with a variety of devices running different processors, so it becomes more important to have that bigger battery.
Specs and logistics aside, I’m amazed by the Ultra’s battery life, as was CNET’s mobile reporter Lisa Eadicicco when she reviewed the Ultra.
The S23 Ultra’s 200-megapixel camera
Camera quality is the most important aspect of any phone for me. I take a lot of pictures and videos for work and social media, including for my very niche tea account on Instagram. The camera on the Galaxy phones kept me in the Samsung family for a decade, so I was eager to compare the S23 Ultra’s cameras to the iPhone 14 Pro’s.Â
What I noticed right away is how much more saturated photos on the Ultra are. In most cases, that saturation adds a nice color boost to images and makes them stand out more. Pictures of my colorful teacups look even more vibrant on the Ultra. Sometimes, that saturation can be a bit overwhelming and makes photos look unnatural, as if there’s a filter on them. But other times, it makes colors and subjects stand out, in a good way.


The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 200-megapixel sensor brings out details and color in this decorative teacup.
Abrar Al-Heeti/CNETThe 200-megapixel sensor on the Ultra punches up color and detail even more. A picture I took of a decorative teacup emphasizes the intricate floral design and gold trim and another image of a Klay Thompson mural shows vivid blues and yellows.Â
Not all moments are made for a 200-megapixel sensor, though. In another image taken outdoors, the sensor removed a few too many highlights, so it was harder to see detail and make sense of what’s going on.Â
Overall, I appreciate the softness and brightness of photos on the Ultra. Shadows on the iPhone are often a bit too harsh and give some images a darker overtone. An image of the sky on the Ultra will look nice and bright, while on the iPhone, there might be distracting shadows under clouds. The Ultra’s softness and brightness also make for more flattering selfies. You can adjust the iPhone’s camera settings and play around with things like contrast, tone and color temperature, and even mimic photography styles on the Galaxy (and vice versa), but I do wish the iPhone just automatically adjusted for things like shadows a little better.Â
The camera feature that surprised me most was Portrait mode. I think of Portrait mode on the iPhone as the gold standard. The subject is usually in perfect focus, the background is smoothly blurred and the colors are more natural looking. But I noticed there’s something the Ultra did better than my iPhone. I took a picture of my friend while she had sunglasses on top of her head, and the iPhone struggled to keep the bridge and sides of the glasses in focus, while the Ultra didn’t. It’s that small detail that shows how far Portrait mode has come on Galaxy phones. I still prefer the look of iPhone portraits because of the lower saturation, and you can catch a bit more detail in the background, which is nice. Â


The picture on the left was taken with Portrait mode on the iPhone 14 Pro, while the one on the right was taken with the Galaxy S23 Ultra. If you look closely, you’ll nice the iPhone blurs the bridge and sides of the glasses, while the Ultra doesn’t.
Abrar Al-Heeti/CNETDoes the Galaxy S23 Ultra beat the iPhone at video?
Given the popularity of TikTok and Instagram Reels right now, video is a huge focus for both Apple and Samsung — and also important for folks like me who take a lot of videos. Since switching to the iPhone, I’ve seen an uptick in the quality of my videos. The colors are more natural and the images sharper. Cinematic mode makes subjects pop and lends a more professional look to my content. Samsung has its own Cinematic mode equivalent, called Portrait video. It also does a great job of blurring the background, but objects and people look a little less defined than they do on iPhone. Â
One area where the Ultra is a clear winner is with video stabilization. Even walking down the stairs, the footage is incredibly smooth, as if you’re using a gimbal. With the iPhone, you can still sense each step being taken, and there’s a lot more movement.Â
The S23 Ultra’s design vs. iPhone 14 ProÂ
Let’s be honest: the iPhone’s camera bumps are ridiculous. The Ultra is a breath of fresh air because the cameras don’t stick out as much, so it wobbles less when you set it down.Â
The S Pen on the Ultra is a fun extra, though I never found myself reaching for it. There’s not much I want to write by hand, and I can just tap the screen for pretty much all functions. Still, I’m glad the legacy of the retired Galaxy Note series lives on.Â


The S Pen returns on the Galaxy S23 Ultra.
James Martin/CNETThe in-screen fingerprint reader was a favorite feature of mine on my Galaxy phones, and it’s nice to have that option again while using the Ultra. I missed it when I first switched to the iPhone, but Face ID is solid enough that I quickly got over it. Unlocking both phones has been seamless.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s price is the same as the iPhone
The S23 Ultra is $1,200 for 256 GB of storage and is priced similarly to the iPhone 14 Pro Max with the same amount of storage. The smaller iPhone 14 Pro is $1,100 for 256GB. Whether you’re a Galaxy fan or an iPhone lover, $1,200 is a lot. But in this case, you get what you pay for.
Galaxy S23 Ultra vs. iPhone 14 Pro final thoughtsÂ


Those camera bumps on the iPhone 14 Pro feel a little excessive.
John Kim/CNETIt’s been fun to revisit a world I’ve abandoned and compare the iPhone I have now to the one I could’ve had if I’d stayed in the Galaxy family. While there are aspects to the S23 Ultra that I appreciate, like brighter and more colorful images, better video stabilization and incredible battery life, there are advantages to having an iPhone that go beyond specs that’ll likely keep me in the Apple ecosystem for a while. Features like Airdrop and iMessage have made the user experience more seamless. And I don’t know if I could give up the iPhone’s video quality for anything else. Â
Still, I know that if I want to take a picture that makes people’s jaws drop, I’ll likely reach for the S23 Ultra. Then I’ll wait for the look of shock when I tell them it wasn’t taken with an iPhone.
Check out the video above to see more of my experience trying out these two phones, along with some side-by-side examples of photos and videos taken on each.Â
Technologies
Trump media ban lawsuit set for Wednesday court hearing
President Donald Trump said he banned the three media outlets because of what he called “cumulative stories,” saying, “You get sick of it.”
MS NOW, CNN and Politico sued President Donald Trump on Monday morning in Washington, D.C., federal court, seeking to reverse his total ban on those three media outlets from the White House.
Journalists from the outlets were prevented from entering the White House on Saturday and had their credentials taken away, a day after Trump announced he would bar them from working there.
Judge Timothy Kelly later Monday ordered the Department of Justice to respond to the outletsâ request for a temporary restraining order against the ban by Tuesday.
Kelly scheduled a videoconference hearing on the outletsâ request for 3:30 p.m. ET Wednesday. The judge was nominated by Trump to the federal bench in 2017.
âThis ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles,â the lawsuit says, arguing that the ban has already âseverely impeded the ability ofâ the three outlets to cover Trump and his administration.
âPresidents from the earliest days of the Republic have disagreed with and complained about the tenor and content of press coverage of their administrations,â notes the civil complaint.
But âthe Constitution protects the liberty and property interests that news organizations and White House reporters have in their press credentials and the access those credentials afford them to cover the White House for the benefit of the public,â the suit says.
âNo official can deprive Plaintiffs of those interests on a whim â with no notice, no process, and no warning â as the President did here.â
Trump, in announcing the ban in a Truth Social post Friday, accused the outlets of writing fiction and lies about him, and warned, âOther Fake News Media Outlets to follow.â The president cited what he called âcumulative storiesâ by the three news organizations, adding, âYou get sick of it.â
On Monday morning, after the lawsuit was announced, Trump in a Truth Social post said, âThe White House is not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish.â
âIt is instituting an assault on the FAKE NEWS, something that has grown like Cancer in our beloved United States of America,â Trump wrote. âIt is corrupt, purposeful, pervasive, fully coordinated, and totally out of control.â
âIt is a threat to our National Security, and must be stopped, NOW!â he said. Trump had not previously cited national security in justifying the ban. The president gave no examples to back up his claim.
The suit alleges the ban violates the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution by failing to give the outlets advance notice and an opportunity to challenge it, without establishing clear standards for Trumpâs decision.
The complaint also says the ban violates the Constitutionâs First Amendment by retaliating âagainst protected newsgathering and speech.â
And it says the ban violates the First Amendment for a separate reason: It bars the three media outlets âfrom a nonpublic forum for unlawful reasons.â Those reasons include so-called viewpoint discrimination, or targeting the outlets for their perceived âmotivating ideology or the opinion or perspective.â
In a joint statement Monday, the three outlets said, âThis morning, we notified the government that we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes.â
âWithout notice or process, the White House revoked our journalistsâ credentials because it objected to our reporting,â the statement said. âLeft unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the publicâs right to independent journalism free from government interference.â
Theodore Boutrous Jr., the attorney for the three outlets, said in a statement, âThe law is on our side across the board, and we look forward to presenting our arguments to the court as soon as possible.
The White House, in a statement later Monday, said Trump removed the three outlets âfrom the White House grounds after years of false reporting.â
âThe First Amendment protects their right to publish; it does not entitle them to a hard pass, briefing room seat, or place in the press pool,â the White House said. âAccess changes are nothing new. What is new, however, is the sudden claim that it becomes sacred only when the outlets are friendly to the Radical Left. The rule was never âevery outlet gets in.â It was always âour side stays in.ââ
Kelly, the judge, in November 2018 ordered the White House to restore the press pass of then-CNN correspondent Jim Acosta, which the White House revoked after the journalist had a contentious exchange with Trump earlier that month. CNN sued Trump to get Acostaâs credentials restored.
Trump referenced Kelly by name, and mentioned his ruling on Acosta, in a Truth Social post later Monday that suggested the president believes the judge will ruling against him in the new lawsuit.
âThe Judgeâs name is Tim Kelly, and he was, sadly, appointed by âTRUMP,â the president wrote.
âIn other words, almost without question and, as usual, weâll go for appeal because Fake News people and publications that only write negatively, and who violate our National Security by writing false and defamatory stories with unknown âsources,â shouldnât be allowed access to the most important Office anywhere in the World.â
In addition to Trump, the defendants named in the complaint include Steven Cheung, his assistant for communications, White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles, and Sean Curran, director of the U.S. Secret Service.
The named plaintiffs are the three outlets and three White House reporters: Akayla Gardner of MS NOW, Betsy Klein of CNN, and Politicoâs Cheyenne Haslett. The three journalists were denied entry to the White House on Saturday and their hard passes were taken away by a Secret Service officer there, the suit says.
On Sunday night, the White House removed CNN from its scheduled rotation as the pool television network for the White House travel pool. The pool was set to travel Monday with Trump for his visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly.
The lawsuit cites the White Houseâs removal of CNN from Mondayâs pool schedule as an example of the ban âcausing irreparable harm toâ the outlets.
After the suit was announced Monday, members of the White House television press pool decided not to cover Trump ahead of his trip or in New York because of the action targeting CNN.
The suit is being filed in the same court where The Associated Press has a pending lawsuit against the White House for a ban on that wire serviceâs journalists working in certain restricted spaces in the White House, including the Oval Office and on Air Force One. The White Houseâs partial ban on the AP came in February 2025 after the wire service refused to reflect Trumpâs renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the âGulf of Americaâ in how it routinely refers to that international body of water.
Trump told reporters Friday that the latest ban is worth implementing, even if it is overturned by a judge.
âI think itâs good to point it out, whether it survives or doesnât,â he said.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, during an interview Monday morning in New York with CNBCâs âSquawk Box,â said, âI donât know much about it,â when asked his opinion of the ban.
But Bessent also suggested the ban was justified, saying âlegacy mediaâ is unpopular with the public âbecause of the perceived bias.â
Asked by CNBCâs Joe Kernen about a possible âoff-rampâ from the ban, Bessent said, âWeâll see. Maybe itâs a change in coverage at the White House.â
Bessent also said, âThe one thing Iâm sure of: The press cares more about the press than anything else,â claiming news media focused more on the personal experiences of journalists at the aborted White House Correspondentsâ Dinner in April than a gunmanâs would-be assassination of Trump.
âOne thing Iâm sure is that this [ban] will be covered by the press,â Bessent said. âAnd, you know, I think we could get back to something that is a little more, I canât even remember which network it is, fair and balanced.â
Fox News, a media outlet that is often criticized as being biased toward Trump and his administration, previously used the slogan âFair and Balanced,â before discontinuing its use about a decade ago.
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, in a statement Monday, said, âWeâre glad to see that these news organizations are suing.â
âThe presidentâs decision to bar them from the White House for the content of their reporting is a flagrant violation of the First Amendment,â Jaffer said. âItâs an attack both on press freedom and the publicâs right to independent information about the government. We will support these news organizations in court.â
White House Correspondentsâ Association President Jacqui Heinrich, in a statement Saturday, said, âThe American people, through a free and independent press, must be able to scrutinize those elected to power, regardless of whether government officials view it favorably.â
âThatâs why courts have repeatedly held that once the White House provides access to journalists, it cannot deny that access arbitrarily or based on the content of their reporting,â said Heinrich, a Fox News correspondent.
In the APâs lawsuit, Judge Trevor McFadden ruled in April 2025 that Trumpâs partial ban of the agencyâs journalists violated the First Amendment and ordered that the AP be given the same access as other members of the presidential press pool to the Oval Office, other restricted areas of the White House and Air Force One.
âThe Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalists â be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhere â it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints,â wrote McFadden, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump.
âThe Constitution requires no less,â the judge said.
Rather than allowing the AP access to places the White House press pool goes to cover the president, the White House said it would abolish the so-called wire pool, which included the AP, Bloomberg and Reuters. The wire pool for decades had traveled with presidents to bring news coverage to news consumers around the world. It has not been reinstated.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in a 2-1 vote in June 2025, blocked McFaddenâs ruling from taking effect while Trump appealed it.
The panel heard oral arguments in the appeal in November but has not issued a decision.
Disclosure: CNBC and MS NOW are divisions of Versant Media.
Technologies
U.S. strikes Greenland deal at UN to expand military presence at Arctic outposts
Trump said the agreement with Greenland and Denmark would give the U.S. “permanent control over security” in the Danish island territory.
President Donald Trump and the leaders of Greenland and Denmark signed a deal Tuesday allowing the U.S. to expand its military presence in Greenland, while maintaining the sovereignty of Denmark and its autonomous island territory.
âThis is tremendous for Europe and for the United States and for everybody and for Greenland,â Trump said at a signing ceremony with the other leaders on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly in New York City. âItâs going to be incredible.â
The deal builds on an existing defense agreement from 1951, under which the U.S. established a presence at Pituffik Space Base. The amended deal signed Tuesday lets the U.S. expand that base and establish two new ones, and leaves the door open for additional defense areas to be built.
The two new sites are at Narsarsuaq, home to just a few dozen residents after the U.S. shut its Bluie West One base in the 1950s, and Mestersvig, a military outpost used by the Sirius Patrol, a Danish special forces unit, Reuters reported.
Trump had announced the deal on Truth Social on Friday, saying it would give the U.S. what he described as âpermanent control over security, and all other needsâ in the Danish island territory.
Trump has repeatedly insisted during his second term that the U.S. must take control of Greenland for national security reasons, at times declining to rule out the possibility of using military force to acquire it. Trumpâs demands alarmed Greenlanders and other Europeans and opened a rift between the U.S. and NATO, of which Denmark and the U.S. are both members. Greenland has maintained it is not for sale, and the European Union earlier this year united to rebuke Trump over his push to acquire the island.
Trump signaled in Fridayâs post that he was satisfied by the new deal, asserting that it addresses âALL of our many U.S. concernsâ and at no cost to the U.S.
The agreement gives the U.S. âthe complete ability to do what is necessary to defend the American continent, and also Europe and other places,â Trump said during his address at the UN general assembly Tuesday morning before signing the pact.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen said Friday that the deal âstrengthens our common security in the Arctic and the North Atlantic area and therefore is great for NATO and Europe as well.â
Secretary of State Marco Rubio on Monday pressed allies of the U.S., including Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Norway and Sweden, to raise defense spending in the Arctic region, his spokesman said.
The deal signed Tuesday would bar non-NATO nations, such as China and Russia, from establishing a military footprint in Greenland. It would also prohibit sensitive investments by non-allies that may pose national security threats.
Retreating sea ice has opened new shipping lanes and exposed mineral deposits across the Arctic, drawing the U.S., Russia and China to bolster their presence in the region and raising concerns international rivals.
Technologies
AI stock valuations may have peaked. Trivariate Research thinks these shares can keep working
Revenue growth could more than offset anticipated contractions in stock multiples for some key AI stocks over the next few years
It may all be downhill from here for valuations of artificial intelligence-related stocks, but that doesnât mean investors need to start fleeing the space en masse, according to Trivariate Research. Revenue growth could more than offset anticipated contractions in multiples for some key AI stocks over the next few years, the firm said. âWe think that the interest rate cycle, and policy direction on AI both yield the same answer â that multiples for AI-related names are likely to continue to decline, and maybe have permanently peaked,â wrote Trivariate founder Adam Parker. Still, âwe continue to want exposure to this group.â On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve raised its overnight interbank borrowing rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% â the first hike in more than three years. The hike followed a hot August jobs report that exceeded Wall Streetâs expectations, as well as an inflation uptick in August. Higher interest rates can hurt AI stocks as many companies involved in the ongoing buildout of computing power are heavily indebted. As rates rise, these companies will have to pay more to borrow money. AI companies are also facing political pushback on multiple fronts. Multiple states are considering bans on data center construction, with 71% of Americans opposing construction projects in their area, according to a Gallup poll published in May . Trivariate said Sunday that job losses due to AI expected next year could also mean additional regulation of the technology that could have consequences for stock returns. Still, Trivariateâs Adam Parker thinks investors shouldnât give up on the space completely. The research firm put together a list of AI stocks over the weekend whose revenue expansion could more than make up for declining valuations. Among them are data center operator Iren , along with cloud providers Nebius and CoreWeave . Chipmakers AMD and Marvell Technology and database manager Oracle also made the list. CoreWeave popped more than 6% Monday as the broader AI trade outperformed to start the week. Still, shares are down more than 26% over the past three months. Oracle rose slightly on the day, but is down more than 19% over the three six months. To be sure, it trades at a slight discount to the broader market. Oracle has a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 16.4, per FactSet, while the S & P 500 has a multiple of 19.3. AI chipmaker Marvell has been on a fairly steady rise since the end of August and is up about 200% year to date. AMD, which jumped 9% on the day, has also rallied 184% in 2026. âWe remain directionally optimistic for the near-term,â Parker said. âThe earnings narrative of continued upward earnings revisions, remains intact.â
This site is now part of Versant. By continuing to use this service, you agree to our Terms. You also acknowledge that our updated Privacy Policy applies, including to your existing data. For details on your data rights, click here.
On this service, we and our vendors use cookies and other tools (âCookiesâ) to store and access information on your device, such as device identifiers, IP address, and your browser type. You can access a list of all our potential 1021 vendors by selecting âIAB and Google Vendors,â although we may work with only a small selection of these on this service. Your data may be used to save and communicate your privacy choices; ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug our products and services; personalize advertising and content; for advertising and content measurement; to conduct audience research and services development; so we can improve our services and develop new ones; to match and combine offline data with your online activity; and for social features. We may share this data with select vendors with your consent.
Click âI Acceptâ, to consent to our use of these Cookies or âReject Allâ to reject our use of these Cookies. Click âManage Choicesâ to set your preferences. If you previously made choices with respect to Versantâs use of Cookies on this browser and device, you will need to update them. You can adjust your choices any time through the âCookie Preferencesâ link in the footer of relevant Versant sites or in-app settings. Visit our Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more.
We will also use other Cookies that are essential or related to our services, including for security and fraud prevention.
Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
– Your Privacy
– Strictly Necessary
– Save and communicate privacy choices 516 partners can use this special purpose
– Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 651 partners can use this special purpose
– Deliver and present advertising and content 639 partners can use this special purpose
– Store and/or access information on a device 847 partners can use this purpose
– Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 988 partners can use this purpose
– Targeted Advertising
– Content Selection
On this service, we and our vendors use cookies and other tools (âCookiesâ) to store and access information on your device, such as device identifiers, IP address, and your browser type. Your data may be used to save and communicate your privacy choices; ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug our products and services; personalize advertising and content; for advertising and content measurement; to conduct audience research and services development; so we can improve our services and develop new ones; to match and combine offline data with your online activity; and for social features. We may share this data with select vendors with your consent. You can adjust your choices any time through the âCookie Preferencesâ link in the footer of relevant Versant sites or in-app settings.
We will also use other Cookies that are essential or related to our services, including for security and fraud prevention. To learn more about some of our vendors, see the IAB and Google Vendors under each purpose. Visit our Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more.
Always Active
These Cookies and SDKs are required for Service functionality, including security and fraud prevention, and to enable any purchasing capabilities. You can set your browser to block these tracking technologies, but some parts of the site may not function properly.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
– Use limited data to select advertising 787 partners can use this purposeAdvertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
– Create profiles for personalised advertising 633 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
– Use profiles to select personalised advertising 637 partners can use this purposeAdvertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
– Create profiles to personalise content 259 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
– Use profiles to select personalised content 231 partners can use this purposeContent presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
– Measure advertising performance 912 partners can use this purposeInformation regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
– Measure content performance 403 partners can use this purposeInformation regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
– Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 575 partners can use this purposeReports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
– Develop and improve services 683 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
– Use limited data to select content 179 partners can use this purposeContent presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
These Cookies and SDKs are used to collect data about your browsing habits, use of the Services, your preferences, and your interaction with advertisements across platforms and devices for the purpose of delivering targeted advertising content, both on our Services and on third party sites. Third-party sites and services also use Targeting Cookies to deliver content, including advertisements relevant to your interests on the Services. If you reject these Cookies or SDKs, you will see less relevant advertising.
Data collected under this category through Cookies and SDKs can also be used to select and deliver personalized content, such as news articles and videos.
Consent Leg.Interest
label
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of ĐĄrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
