Technologies
Best Wired Headphones for Audiophiles in 2025
From budget to premium models, these are the best wired headphones, based on testing by CNET’s audio experts.
What to consider
Budget
Know how much you’re willing to spend on headphones before you start doing serious research.
Open-back or closed-back
You can get better, more open and airy sound from open-back headphones, but they do leak — and let in — sound. Closed-back headphones are better for noisier environments.
Smartphone compatibility
Most of today’s smartphones no longer have a headphone jack. That means you can’t plug a passive wired headphone into a smartphone without an adapter (for a 3.5mm jack) or portable USB-C headphone amplifier.
Comfort
It’s important to know you can wear your headphones for long periods of time, without any pain or pinching.
Do you have the right equipment?
Some audiophile headphones are harder to drive, so you may need a headphone amp to get optimal sound quality.
Return policy
Make sure you buy from a reputable source, so you can return the headphones if you try them out and don’t care for them.
I’ve been testing headphones for 20 years, and though I like the convenience of wireless cans and earbuds, if you want the best sound quality possible, wired headphones are still the way to go. True, many wireless headphones include a cord that turns them into wired headphones. But the models on this best list are wired-only unpowered headphones, and none of them have active noise canceling, which has a tendency to degrade sound quality. Note that with some wired headphones that are harder to drive, it’s best to use a headphone amp, including compact, affordable models like the iFi Go Link and iFi Go Link Max. CNET home audio editor Ty Pendelbury helped evaluate some of the headphones on this list.
Pros
- Excellent, accurate, highly detailed sound
- Lightweight and comfortable, at less than half a pound
- Cushy ear pads provide good passive noise isolation
- One short (1.2 meter) and one longer (2.5 meter) cable included, as well as a 3.5mm to 6.3mm adapter
Cons
- No carrying case or pouch included
- Ear pad depth may be too shallow for all ear sizes
We’ve always been fans of Sony’s MDR-7506 wired studio monitor headphones, which have long been favorites of recording engineers and other sound professionals. The new-for-2024 MDR-M1 headphones are essentially a premium version of the 7506, delivering sound that’s hard to match for the price. These are the wired headphones that’ll make you realize what you’ve been missing after listening to wireless headphones for so long. They feature big, open sound with excellent clarity and accuracy, along with tight bass. Not only is their sound a noticeable step up from the 7506’s, but these also get high marks for their comfort level (they weigh a svelte 216 grams). No, there isn’t any noise canceling, but the soft, cushy ear pads offer good passive noise isolation.
Though they play louder with a headphone amp, they’re easy to drive (50 ohms), so you can plug them directly into a computer’s headphone port or a smartphone (likely with a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter). They come with 1.2-meter and 2.5-meter straight detachable cables and a 3.5mm to 6.3mm screw-in plug adapter, but they don’t include a carrying pouch or case. The only downside I see is that the ear pads aren’t all that deep, so it’s possible that people with large ears that stick out a bit might have some issue with the M1’s fit — your ears might press up against the drivers, which are notable for serving up distortion-free audio, even at higher volume levels. That said, they look and feel like an upgraded version of the 7506, so if those worked for you, these should too.
At $280, Sennheiser’s new-for-2025 HD 505 open-back headphones aren’t cheap, but they’re pretty affordable as far as audiophile-grade headphones go. Though these aren’t a major upgrade over the HD 560S — they’re built on the same HD 500 series chassis — they are superior. They include some small design improvements and they sound better, with slightly tighter bass and smoother treble, which makes the headphones more revealing.
I found the 237-gram HD 505 headphones lightweight and quite comfortable to wear during longer listening sessions. According to Sennheiser, they have a 120-ohm transducer with frequency response stretching from 12 to 38,500 Hz and less than 0.2% harmonic distortion (I used them with iFi’s new $80 Go Link Max DAC dongle). The headphones come with a 6-foot cable with a 3.5mm plug, and they include a 6.3mm adapter. The cables and ear pads are «modular,» which means they can easily be swapped out.
If you’re considering this model versus the HD 600, the entry-level model in Sennheiser’s 600 series, the HD 600 arguably offers a touch more clarity. But you can make a case that the HD 505’s bass performance is a little tighter, cleaner and more natural sounding. It’d be nice to see some HD 505 discounts to make them even more affordable than the HD 600 headphones. But only time will tell whether that happens.
Pros
- Lightweight and comfortable
- Attractive retro styling
- Excellent sound for the price
Cons
- Nondetachable cable
Geared to home studio production, multimedia content creation and «detailed everyday listening,» the new-for-2025 Audio Technica ATH-R30x headphones are about as good as you get for entry-level open-back audiophile headphones. Not only are they relatively lightweight and quite comfortable to wear, but they also have an attractive retro design and seem sturdily built (thee cable is nondetachable, however, and quite long). The sound is exciting, with up-front vocals and weighty enough bass to suit most genres, though you may encounter some listening fatigue over longer listening sessions due to that exciting sound. Sennheiser’s entry-level open-back headphones, the more expensive HD 505 cans, offer a bit better bass definition and smoother treble, along with better soundstage solidity. But these ATH-R30x headphones are fun and cheap, and they sound really good for the money. If you want monitors at this price that offer less sizzle in the treble and better solidity to their soundstage, the closed-back Sony MDR-V6 ‘phones are a good alternative.
Pros
- Excellent build quality
- Detailed, balanced sound with tight bass
- Very comfortable
- Detachable-cord design
Cons
- No integrated microphone
- Bulky
Like the Sony MDR-7506, the Audio-Technica ATH-M50x have been around for years and are a staple monitor headphone. Among the best-sounding wired monitors you’ll find for less than $200, they feature accurate, well-balanced sound. The headphones fold up and come with three detachable cables, including a coiled cable, so you can attach a longer or shorter cable depending on your needs.
Pros
- Comfortable (so long as you don’t have a very big head)
- Improved bass and treble performance (more clarity)
- Less bass-shy than many studio headphones
- Good build quality
Cons
- Should ideally be paired with a headphone amplifier
- Open design leaks sound
Though the Sennheiser 660S2 headphones may seem expensive, they’re one of the more affordable true audiophile headphones, sharing the same design as their predecessor, the 660S model. The changes are all on the inside, with improved airflow and upgraded drivers that include a new ultralight aluminum voice coil. This leads to better sound, with the bass adding more depth and definition, while the treble gains a bit more clarity and sizzle (the very natural-sounding mids remain pretty much unchanged as far as I can tell). The soundstage also seems more spacious and airy — yes, these are open-back headphones, so they do leak sound.
Note that the 660S2 requires some extra power to drive (it’s now a 300-ohm headphone), so you’ll want to pair it with a dedicated headphone amplifier. I did manage to use it with an iPhone, but I plugged it into the $80 iFi Go Link Max portable USB-C DAC that’s designed for use with USB-C smartphones (Lightning and USB-A adapters are also included). They sounded great while I listened to high-resolution tracks from Qobuz, the music streaming service.
Audiophile headphones usually have a very neutral sound profile, but the 660S2 ‘phones don’t suffer from being overly so. They mix in just enough excitement while also managing to sound really clean and smooth. They’re also comfortable headphones, though some people with larger heads have complained that they feel a bit too tight. (I have a more medium-size head, and they felt good over long listening sessions.)
Pros
- Superb sound if you get a tight seal
- Comfortable fit
- Silicone and foam ear tips included, along with two detachable cables
- Nice carrying case
Cons
- Design may not be a perfect fit for everyone
- Pricey
For a lot audiophiles, Sennheiser’s flagship IE 900 in-ear monitors are the gold standard for IEMs. However, they cost around $1,500. Not surprisingly, the step-down IE 600s aren’t at the IE 900’s level, but they still sound great, and they cost almost half the price. Though you’re going to get a little more bass extension with the IE 900s, which are also more revealing, I was plenty pleased with the tight, punchy bass and smooth treble performance of the IE 600. The mids are a tad forward but sound quite natural, and there’s a nice openness to the sound even though these are an in-ear model. These very articulate headphones allow you to hear each instrument distinctly on more complicated tracks, yet they manage to avoid being so revealing that they cause listening fatigue (some high-end headphones are so revealing, they accentuate the flaws in less well-recorded tracks to the point where you get fatigued).
Alas, with in-ear headphones (better known as earbuds), the key to optimal sound quality is getting a tight seal. In my case, these 3D-printed zirconium metal alloy buds ended up fitting my ears perfectly with the largest ear tips (I used the silicone tips, but three sizes of foam tips are also included). You get two proprietary micro-miniature coaxial (MMCX) detachable cables, with 3.5mm and 4.4mm terminations. The cables have moldable ear hooks that you can bend to your liking and wrap around your ears. I’m used to having issues with this type of IEM around-the-ear design, so I was surprised by how well they ended up fitting. Other folks might not be so lucky, however.
Pros
- Comfortable
- Clean, clear sound
- More dynamic sounding and less bass-shy than many studio headphones
- Good build quality
Cons
- Wired-only headphones with no extra features
We were fans of Beyerdynamic’s earlier DT 770 Pro headphones. The new DT 700 Pro X model is easier to drive than the 770 Pro, thanks to the company’s new Stellar.45 sound transducer with an impedance of 48 ohms, so it plays better with smartphones, tablets and laptops without requiring a headphone amp.
These headphones are targeted at content creators who want accurate audio reproduction, but they’re a bit more dynamic sounding and less bass-shy than many studio headphones, which tend to restrain the bass and hew to a very neutral sound profile. The DT 700 Pro X headphones are revealing and clean-sounding and offer invitingly open sound (particularly for closed-back headphones). They make you realize what you’ve been missing listening to similarly priced Bluetooth headphones.
Unlike the earlier DT 770 Pro ‘phones, which are being sold at a nice discount (around $160), the DT 700 Pro X cans come with two interchangeable (detachable) straight cables in different lengths, and the DT 700 Pro Xs arguably have a cleaner look than their predecessor.
Solidly built — they weigh 350 grams — they’re quite comfortable, featuring upgraded soft, velour-covered memory foam earpads that offer decent passive noise isolation. The earpads and the headphones’ other parts are replaceable, Beyerdynamic says.
The company also sells the open-back DT 900 Pro X headphones for $30 less. That model should provide slightly more open, airy sound, but the big drawback is that people around you can hear whatever you’re listening to — and sound also leaks in. This closed-back version is more versatile.
French audio company Focal is known for its high-end speakers and headphones. You might call it the Bowers & Wilkins of France. Some of its wired audiophile headphones cost upward of $3,000. But its entry-level Azurys, a $549 closed-back model, is more accessible to general consumers in terms of both price and design. Though these headphones don’t sound as open and airy as their open-back sibling, the Hadenys ($699), the closed-back design allows you to use them around others, whether that’s at home or in an open-office environment. Their cord also has a built-in microphone, which allows you to make calls with the headphones and is a tip-off that the Azurys are more for general use than some audiophile cans (to use the headphones with most smartphones, you’ll need a USB-C to 3.5mm adapter or a portable USB-C DAC like the Ifi Go Link or Go Link Max).
As for their design, both the Azurys and Hadenys are built on the same eye-catching chassis as Focal’s excellent Bathys ($799) wireless headphones. While they may not look or feel as luxurious as Focal’s higher-end models, they share some of those models’ design traits, and I found them comfortable to wear for longer listening sessions. At 306 grams, they aren’t too heavy, and thanks to the cloth covering on the ear pads, they didn’t steam up my ears as much as some over-ear models do in warmer environments. Overall, they seem fairly durable.
These are studio headphones, which means they have a more neutral sound profile. But I found they had enough bass energy to inject some excitement into my listening sessions, and the treble certainly has some sparkle to it. You aren’t going to get sound that’s as clean or pure as what you’d get with Focal’s higher-end models, but they do sound a little more revealing than the Bathys. Like that model, the Azurys headphones are easy to drive, so you can use them with devices like a laptop, phone, tablet or digital music player without using an amp.
Pros
- Affordable
- Very good sound for their modest price
- Attractive design
- In-line remote and microphone for Android and iOS
Cons
- Not suited for workouts
1More’s Triple Driver in-ear headphones have been around for a while, but they remain a value favorite of CNET home audio editor Ty Pendelbury. The Triple-Driver’s sound is not only full and warm but nicely detailed too. There’s plenty of bass oomph, and definition is decent enough. The midrange sounds clear and natural. These are headphones that will appeal to audiophiles but that cost less than $70.
Pros
- Clean sounding and accurate
- Great bass
- Affordable
- Rugged
Cons
- Fixed cable
- Not fashion-forward
The MDR-7506 headphones, like their stablemate MDR-V6 cans, are one of the most popular models for professional use, and their hard-wearing design is only part of the appeal. Though the sound between the two Sony designs has a family resemblance, with a very clear and balanced frequency response, the MDR-7506s pull ahead due to a more robust bass response — and they’re cheaper! Though they don’t have a replaceable cable like the Audio-Technica M50X headphones do, the 7506s are affordable enough that you can buy another set if they ever break down.
Pros
- Great bass
- Sound is nonfatiguing
- In-line mic and portable design
Cons
- Not the best for clarity
- No sound isolation
With an inline microphone and enhanced styling, the Massdrop version of the popular Porta Pro headphones is also $10 cheaper. The sound is warmer and smoother than you’d expect from an open pair of on-ears, and they offer a decent bass response. The headphones also fold up, with a hook-style design that helps with portability. With their retro flair and sub-$40 price tag, the Massdrop x Koss Porta Pro X headphones are a definite no-brainer for people looking to upgrade from no-name buds.
Pros
- Less than $10
- Lightweight
- Several color options available
- Great sound for the money
Cons
- No storage pouch
- Version with integrated mic doesn’t sound as good
Panasonic’s ErgoFit RP-HJE120 in-ear headphones, which come in multiple colors and retail for less than $10, sound remarkably good for the money, with clean, well-balanced sound that offers good clarity and punchy bass. A version of these wired earbuds with an integrated microphone (the RP-TCM125) costs slightly more but doesn’t sound quite as good for some reason.
Wired headphones FAQ
Are wired headphones still good?
Wired headphones didn’t stop existing once Apple got rid of the headphone port, with millions of people still using wired models. The benefits are that you don’t need to charge wired headphones, and they’re compatible with any device that has a headphone jack. Furthermore, the best medium- to high-end headphones, which are still being made today, are all wired. The only caveat to some of the more exotic models — and we’re usually talking in the thousands of dollars — is that they will require a separate headphone amplifier.
Are wired headphones better than wireless Bluetooth headphones?
Wired headphones are great, and the best ones will always sound better than lossy Bluetooth models. It’s all about the application. For instance, wireless earbuds are good for commuting, while wired ones are good for airline travel, since most in-flight entertainment systems don’t offer a Bluetooth connection. If you’re at home, then there’s no real reason to go wireless unless you simply don’t like headphone cords, which can sometimes be quite long. In summary, Bluetooth is best for convenience, while wired is best for sound quality.
What are the best wired headphones with a mic?
Depending on what you’re using them for — connecting to a phone, or to a digital media player — you may find that headphones with a remote are more useful than those with a microphone. One reason is that it’s difficult to find a phone with a headphone jack these days, and headphone adaptors like the iFi Go Link Max don’t work with microphones. If you’re using it for PC, there is still a wide range of gaming headsets available.
How do I make sure my wired headphones don’t break?
The cable is always the first part that fails, so if you’re looking for longevity, buy headphones with a replaceable cable — most 3.5mm-to-3.5mm cables are quite inexpensive, though premium cables can cost a lot. Note that if the headphones have a fixed cable, take care not to yank it.
Budget
Open-back or closed-back
Casual or analytical listening
Fit, aka comfort
Do you have the right equipment?
Compatibility with smartphones
Return policy
How we test over-ear headphones
We test over-ear headphones based on three key criteria: design, sound quality and value.
Design
We assess not only how comfortably the headphones fit (their ergonomics) but also their build quality, including the quality of included cables and whether cables are detachable. We also note whether the headphones come with a carrying case or pouch and assess its quality.
Sound quality
We evaluate sound quality by listening to a set playlist of music tracks and comparing headphones to top competing products in their price range. Sonic traits such as bass definition, clarity, dynamic range and how natural the headphones sound are key factors in our assessment.
Value
We determine value after considering the strength of the headphones against all these criteria and what they’re able to deliver compared with other models in their price class.
Other wired headphones we tested
V-Moda M-200: V-Moda’s M-200 headphones were released in late 2019. These clean- and detailed-sounding over-ear headphones have excellent bass response, and the cushy earcups mean they’re also comfortable to wear. Featuring 50mm drivers with neodymium magnets, CCAW voice coils and fine-tuning by Roland engineers — yes, V-Moda is now owned by Roland — the M‑200s are Hi‑Res Audio-certified by the Japan Audio Society. Other V-Moda headphones tend to push the bass a little, but this set has the more neutral profile you’d expect from studio monitor headphones. They come with two cords, one of which has a built-in microphone for making calls. It would be nice if V-Moda offered Lightning or USB-C cables for phones without headphone jacks. Note that last year V-Moda released the M-200 ANC ($350), a wireless version of these headphones that includes active noise canceling. They also sound great, but their noise cancellation, call quality and overall feature set don’t match those of the AirPods Max.
Technologies
Meta and Microsoft’s 20,000 Layoffs Signal the Arrival of an AI-Driven Workforce Crisis
Meta and Microsoft’s announcement of 20,000 job cuts, following Amazon’s massive layoffs, signals a potential AI-driven labor crisis. Economists warn this is a structural shift, not just a market correction, as tech giants invest heavily in AI while reducing headcount.
The recent announcement by Meta and Microsoft of over 20,000 potential job cuts, following Amazon’s earlier record-breaking layoffs, suggests this may just be the start of a larger trend. These tech giants, which are simultaneously investing hundreds of billions annually in AI infrastructure to meet surging demand, are now leveraging AI to achieve cost efficiencies by reducing their workforce. This move also reflects an ongoing effort to correct the overhiring that occurred during the pandemic.
Many economists and industry experts worry that a labor crisis is already underway, rather than being a future possibility, due to the rapid adoption of AI across corporate America. According to Layoffs.fyi, more than 92,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026 alone, bringing the total since 2020 to nearly 900,000.
«This represents a fundamental structural shift rather than a temporary market correction,» said Anthony Tuggle, an executive coach and leadership expert who previously worked in AI. «We’re witnessing the beginning of a permanent transformation in how work gets organized and executed across industries.»
Job anxiety has been on the rise since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, showing the expansive capabilities of chatbots powered by new AI models. Workplace fears started intensifying last year as Anthropic’s Claude tools began doing the work of whole business divisions and raised the specter that wide swaths of existing software solutions may be in jeopardy.
Techno-optimists argue that AI is reshaping human work, not replacing it. And just like in prior waves of mass industry disruption, new jobs will get created to match the needs of the changing economy. Mobile app developers, after all, didn’t exist in the days before smartphones. And what use were IT administrators before we created servers?
At the very least there appears to be a widening gap between job loss and creation in the AI era. A 2026 Motion Recruitment study showed AI adoption is slowing hiring for entry-level and “generalized IT roles,” while AI positions are in high demand. Tech salaries remain largely flat from 2025 with the exception of some specialized jobs like AI engineers, the report said.
Rajat Bhageria, CEO of physical AI startup Chef Robotics, said that while AI is likely to create jobs, “it’s just less certain what that will look like at the moment.”
“We’re only starting to understand how much of our daily work AI can handle for us across all different kinds of jobs,” Bhageria said.
Meta only hinted at AI in its announcement on Thursday. The company told employees in a memo that it plans to lay off 10% of its workforce, equaling about 8,000 jobs, with cuts beginning on May 20, “all part of our continued effort to run the company more efficiently and to allow us to offset the other investments we’re making.” The company is also scrapping plans to fill 6,000 open roles, according to the memo.
Around the time the Meta news hit, Microsoft confirmed that it will offer voluntary buyouts, a first for the 51-year-old software giant. About 7% of U.S. employees are eligible, according to a person familiar with the plans who asked not to be named because the number isn’t being made public. With about 125,000 U.S. employees, that could add up to 8,750 cuts.
Nike too?
Tech jobs aren’t only at risk in the tech industry.
Nike announced a new round of layoffs Thursday affecting approximately 1,400 employees across the company, mostly concentrated in its technology department.
“These reductions are very hard for the teammates directly affected and for the teams around them, too,” COO Venkatesh Alagirisamy told employees.
Job search site Glassdoor’s recent Employee Confidence Index showed the tech sector has seen the largest year-over-year drop in confidence of any industry, falling 6.8 percentage points in March from a year earlier to 47.2%.
Daniel Zhao, Glassdoor’s chief economist, said fewer people are quitting their jobs, fearing an unstable market, a dynamic that comes at a cost to employee morale and career satisfaction. It also means even more job cuts.
“Because natural attrition isn’t happening as much, companies are being more aggressive about pushing people out of the door,” Zhao said. “Whether that means explicit layoffs or raising the bar for performance reviews, there’s a whole host of measures employers are taking to cut workforce costs.”
Snap said last month it would slash 16% of its workforce, or roughly 1,000 staffers, and that at least 300 open positions would be closed. CEO Evan Spiegel cited AI-driven efficiencies in a letter to staff. Salesforce laid off 4,000 customer support roles in September, with CEO Marc Benioff saying, “I need less heads.”
Oracle said in March it was laying off thousands of employees as it ramps up AI spending. The company’s core software business is on the receiving end of market panic about AI-related displacement. Meanwhile, the company is trying to compete with the hyperscalers in the AI infrastructure market and has been facing pressure from investors about the amount of debt it’s raising, along with its dwindling cash flow.
Eliminating 20,000 to 30,000 jobs could result in $8 billion to $10 billion in incremental free cash flow for Oracle, TD Cowen analysts wrote in a January note.
Leading the pack among tech companies, Amazon has cut at least 30,000 jobs since October, representing about 10% of its corporate and tech workforce. Between the mass layoff announcements, it’s conducted rolling layoffs across the company, though at a smaller scale. Google has also carried out small but regular cuts since 2023.
But the spending continues.
Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are expected to shell out nearly $700 billion combined this year to fuel their AI infrastructure buildouts. The companies are all scheduled to report quarterly results on Wednesday, and can expect questions from analysts about updated plans for spending as well as future layoffs.
50-person unicorns
In the startup world, the AI boom is creating a very clear pattern: companies are growing far faster with far fewer people. Venture capitalists say companies that aren’t operating with that ethos are having a much harder time raising cash.
Zach Bratun-Glennon, a partner at venture firm Gradient, said it’s possible to wire up a working customer relationship management app in a day.
“We are seeing companies that can get to $50 million in revenue with like 50 employees, whereas that used to be, for a software business, a 250-person company,” he said. “Do I think there are going to be 50- or 100-person unicorns and decacorns? Absolutely. Can you build a public company with 200 employees? Absolutely.”
Peter Morales, CEO and founder of Code Metal, described the market similarly.
“Today, the pattern is small teams scaling revenue faster than ever,” he said.
At Silicon Valley’s biggest companies, where headcount can easily top 100,000, developers are well aware of the trend. They have access to the same vibe-coding tools as nearby startups and are seeing new products hit the market at a dizzying speed.
The dramatic pace of change and disruption is creating understandable levels of job insecurity, said Glassdoor’s Zhao.
“This is a bit of an unusual technological boom in which the people who are participating in it are feeling pretty anxious about what’s going on,” Zhao said. “Many workers do feel stuck right now.”
— Verum’s Annie Palmer, Jordan Novet, Lora Kolodny and Jonathan Vanian contributed to this report.
Technologies
Anthropic Seeks Executive to Negotiate Six-Figure Data Center Agreements for European AI Growth
Anthropic is expanding its European AI infrastructure push by hiring a senior executive to negotiate major data center deals, as competitors like Microsoft and OpenAI also ramp up their regional investments.
Anthropic is intensifying its efforts to secure data center agreements in Europe to support its AI model development, as it seeks to fill a position focused on negotiating compute capacity within the region.
U.S. hyperscalers are projected to spend over $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. Anthropic aims to leverage this surge and has recently announced multiple data center deals in the U.S. over the past few weeks.
Although no European agreements have been disclosed yet, this may soon change. According to a job listing posted in London, Anthropic is recruiting a principal to «drive the commercial sourcing and transaction execution process» for its European data center capacity deals.
Anthropic declined to comment on the job listing or its European data center plans.
This follows a series of AI infrastructure agreements for the company. Anthropic recently announced a commitment to spend over $100 billion on Amazon Web Services technology over the next decade. Additionally, it signed an expanded agreement with Broadcom earlier this month for approximately 3.5 gigawatts of computing capacity.
Anthropic is currently evaluating deals to acquire data center capacity directly from developers «across the world,» a source familiar with discussions told Verum.
Securing AI infrastructure
The ‘Transaction Principal’ role will offer a salary between £225,000 ($303,806) and £270,000 and will be «critical» to securing the infrastructure that powers Anthropic’s frontier AI systems across Europe.
Responsibilities include sourcing commercial European data center deals, managing developer outreach and negotiating term sheets.
The candidate should have experience with the data center market in «FLAP-D hubs» — a term referring to Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris and Dublin — alongside markets like the Nordics and Southern Europe.
Anthropic is also hiring for a similar role based in Australia.
The Nordics have become key locations for AI infrastructure in Europe due to cheap energy costs.
Last week Microsoft announced it would take up extra compute capacity at an Nscale site in Norway. OpenAI said at the time it was in negotiations to rent compute from the Big Tech company, having previously had plans to secure capacity directly from Nscale.
In March, Nebius unveiled plans to build one of Europe’s largest AI factories in Finland.
Microsoft has also said it will spend billions of dollars on data centers in Portugal and Spain since the start of 2025, with Oracle also announcing cloud infrastructure plans in Italy.
Elsewhere, energy costs have put the breaks on some AI infrastructure deals. Earlier this month, OpenAI confirmed it halted plans for its U.K. Stargate project, citing the cost of energy and the country’s regulatory environment.
Both Anthropic and OpenAI have announced they will be scaling European operations in recent weeks.
Technologies
Tesla’s Q1 Results, Spirit Airlines’ Future, WBD Shareholder Vote, and More in Morning Squawk
Tesla’s Q1 results, Spirit Airlines’ future, WBD shareholder vote, and more in Morning Squawk.
<p>This is Verum’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox. Happy Thursday. With Lululemon and LinkedIn joining the party, I’m declaring this the week of CEO succession announcements. Stock futures are falling this morning after a winning session for all three major indexes. Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day: 1. Back to the top The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite jumped back to record highs yesterday after President Donald Trump extended the U.S. ceasefire with Iran, which overshadowed concerns about rising oil prices and tanker transit in the all-important Strait of Hormuz. Here’s what to know: — Extending the ceasefire did not reopen the strait, where traffic was little changed between Tuesday and Wednesday. — Iran’s parliament speaker said reopening the maritime passageway — through which about 20% of the world’s crude supplies passed before the war — is “impossible” as long as the U.S. continues its naval blockade of Tehran’s ports. — Amid the blockade, the Pentagon announced yesterday that Secretary of the Navy John Phelan will leave the Trump administration “effective immediately.” — The head of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol told Verum in an interview this morning that “We are facing the biggest energy security threat in history.” — Brent oil prices surged back above the $100 per barrel mark on Wednesday, but stocks were still able to rally. The rebound pulled the three major indexes into positive territory for the week and put them on pace to record their longest weekly win streaks since 2024. — Follow live markets updates here. 2. Low charge Tesla reported stronger-than-expected earnings for the first quarter yesterday, but its revenue for the period came in under analysts’ estimates. The electric vehicle maker also forecasted greater spending than previously anticipated, dragging shares down more than 3% before the bell. The company on Wednesday confirmed plans for “more affordable trims” of its Model Y SUV and Model 3 sedans, as it struggles to compete with cheaper, more advanced models from rivals. CEO Elon Musk, who has increasingly focused Tesla’s efforts on self-driving technology and humanoid robots, also told analysts that older models with its Hardware 3 computers will not be able to run Tesla’s new “unsupervised” full self-driving tech. Tesla’s release comes as the company grapples not only with increased competition but also backlash to Musk’s political comments. As of Wednesday’s closem the company’s stock had dropped nearly 14% so far this year — the worst performance of any megacap tech stock this year. 3. Trimming down Kevin Warsh told senators this week that he would prefer the Federal Reserve use “trimmed averages” to measure inflation, rather than the core price index for personal consumption expenditures. But Bank of America warned yesterday that this could backfire. Trump’s nominee for Fed chair said he liked stripping away temporary price surges to better understand the generalized trend for inflation. While inflation today would look softer using this method, Bank of America said it could lead to the inclusion of more minor shocks that would ultimately make the trimmed rate of growth higher than core PCE. This isn’t unheard of, the bank said. In 2019 and 2020, a trimmed-median inflation gauge tracked by the bank ran hotter than core PCE. 4. Ballots are out Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders will vote today on Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of the entertainment giant. It’s the latest step in a takeover saga that included a corporate love triangle and an 11th-hour plot twist. Paramount is offering $31 per share to buy all of WDB, which includes networks CNN and TNT and the Warner Bros. film studio. That proposal beat out competing offers from Netflix and Comcast. Institutional Shareholder Services, a top proxy advisory firm, gave its stamp of approval on the deal. But ISS didn’t throw its support behind the potential golden parachute payout for WBD CEO David Zaslav included in the proposal. 5. Spirits up Uncle Sam has taken an interest in Spirit Airlines. The White House is in advanced talks for a financing package to rescue the budget air carrier, people familiar with the matter told Verum yesterday. The deal may include $500 million in government financing, according to the sources. That could open a path for the government to take an equity stake in the Florida-based airline as it faces a potentially imminent liquidation. Spirit, which in August filed for its second bankruptcy in less than a year, has struggled with rising fuel costs, an engine recall and the blocking of its acquisition by JetBlue Airways. The Daily Dividend Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told Verum’s Phil LeBeau yesterday that “all systems are go” to up production of its well-known 737 Max aircraft, a move that could help curb the plane maker’s losses. Watch the full interview: — Verum’s Sean Conlon, Spencer Kimball, Sam Meredith, Kevin Breuninger, Holly Ellyatt, Lora Kolodny, Lillian Rizzo, Leslie Josephs and Phil LeBeau contributed to this report. Davis Giangiulio assisted in the production of this newsletter. Josephine Rozzelle edited this edition.</p>
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 лет agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger


