Technologies
Best Travel Headphones for 2025
Do you have upcoming travel plans? We’ve rounded up the best noise-canceling headphones to pack for all your adventures.
What to consider
Budget
Value can reflect quality. Consider your needs and what your budget allows.
Fit (Comfort)
Ensuring the headphones you choose fit your head help minimize any discomfort from extended wear.
Durability
Sturdy quality helps ensure your headphones hold up well over time.
Features
Premium headphones should offer best-in-class noise cancelling as well as have great microphones for phone calls.
Return Policy
Be sure to buy from a reputable retailer so you can make a return if you aren’t 100% happy with your purchase.
Over the last 10 years, I’ve tested dozens of headphones and earbuds during my travels. My current favorite travel headphones are not only comfortable, but they also feature good sound quality and strong noise-canceling performance. True-wireless earbuds are usually a great pick for travel since they’re compact and can be easily stored in your pocket. However, they won’t connect to a wired in-flight system unless they come with a charging case that has a built-in Bluetooth transceiver like the Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 earbuds. You could also buy a separate transceiver, like the Twelve South’s AirFly Pro 2 or other similar products you can find on Amazon.
HEADPHONE DEALS OF THE WEEK
-
$250 (save $101)
-
$295 (save $154)
-
$278 (save $70)
-
$280 (save $170)
What are the best travel headphones overall?
It’s tough to pick just one model as the absolute best overall travel headphone, but the new Sony WH-1000XM6 is arguably it — for the moment anyway. For full-size over-ear noise-canceling headphones, I also like the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, Sony WH-1000XM5 and Sonos Ace, as well as the relatively lightweight Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC and more affordable Sony CH-720N (lighter is better when it comes to travel headphones). All these models feature active noise canceling to block external noise and they’re also good for making voice calls. Plenty of great noise-canceling earbud options are also available, including the highly rated Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd gen), Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 and Sony’s WF-1000XM5.
What we updated: August 2025
We added the Skullcandy Aviator 900 ANC and Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 to the list. We also moved the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds to the «Other top travel headpones we’ve tested» section, as Bose has released the QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd gen).
Best travel headphones of 2025
Pros
- Upgraded design with more comfortable fit
- Improved noise canceling and sound quality
- New QN3 chip is seven times as powerful as QN1 chip in XM5
- Excellent voice-calling performance with more mics
- Improved transparency mode
- Spatial audio with head tracking
Cons
- $50 more than previous model
- No USB-C audio
- It’s not so clear how you access spatial audio
Why I like them
Over the last several years, Sony has made some of the best noise-canceling headphones on the market, so it’s a big deal when the company comes out with a new flagship model, like the WH-1000XM6, which arrives three years after the release of the WH-1000XM5. Though the XM5 was — and still is — one of the top over-ear Bluetooth headphones, there’s always room for improvement. With the XM6, Sony has fixed the small design flaws of its predecessor while bumping up the overall performance. The result is a headphone that’s arguably edged just ahead of the competition and is now at the top of its class. Read my WH-1000XM6 review.
Reasons to buy
The WH-1000XM6 are excellent for frequent travelers, remote workers and commuters who demand top-tier sound quality, noise canceling and call quality in a very comfortable headphone. If you can afford the high price, you’ll appreciate what Sony has achieved here.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
If you’re budget-conscious or already own Sony’s WH-1000XM5 headphones, you should hold off until they go on sale. They offer some significant improvements over the XM5s, but not enough to justify rushing to upgrade at full price.
Pros
- Design is an upgrade
- Lightweight and very comfortable
- Excellent sound and great noise canceling
- Voice-calling performance is top-notch
- Immersive Audio mode offers some sound-quality enhancements
Cons
- Higher price than the previous model
- No USB-C audio
- Immersive Audio mode hurts battery life
While Bose’s new flagship QuietComfort Ultra Headphones may not be a huge upgrade over the company’s Noise Cancelling 700 headphones, they feature a more premium design along with Bose’s new Immersive Audio feature, which delivers some sound-quality enhancements. Along with excellent sound and great noise canceling, the QC Ultra Headphones are also superb for making calls, with top-notch background noise reduction. All that adds up to the best new noise-canceling headphones of 2024 and a worthy adversary to Sony’s highly rated WH-1000XM5 and Apple’s AirPods Max.
Pros
- Relatively lightweight and comfortable
- Not only fold flat but fold up into a nicely designed crossbody travel bag
- Very good sound after tweaking EQ settings
- Well-designed physical controls
- Good noise-canceling and voice-calling performance
- THX spatial audio with head tracking
- Strong battery life (up to 50 hours with ANC on)
Cons
- No USB-C audio
- Fairly pricey
- No support for LDAC and aptX audio codecs (AAC and SBC only)
Why I like them
We reviewed Skullcandy’s wired Aviator Roc Nation headphones all the way back in 2011. Now Skullcandy’s brought the Aviator design back in a wireless noise-canceling model called the Aviator 900 ANC headphones. They kind of surprised me because Skullcandy is better known for its Crusher headphones, which deliver bone-rattling bass but are not so-called premium-sounding headphones. However, the Aviator 900, developed in partnership with THX, deliver surprisingly impressive sound. They’re not so great out of the box, but after you make some tweaks to the EQ in the app and turn on the THX spatial audio, the sound improves dramatically and is arguably more exciting than the new Nothing Headphone (1)’s sound and more fun to listen to.
Like the Nothing Headphones (1), the Aviator 900 ANC list for $300 and have a translucent theme. However, the Aviator 900 are lighter (289 grams) and more comfortable to wear. Plus, they not only fold flat but fold up into a well-designed crossbody travel bag (you can remove the strap) and have some nifty physical control buttons. I also liked the integrated mini LED display, though its value is dubious because you can’t see it while you have the headphones on. The Aviator 900 offer good noise-canceling and voice-calling performance, though the Nothing Headphone (1) may have a slight edge in those departments. Even so, I slightly preferred Skullcandy’s headphones for their fit and sound, especially after a firmware upgrade fixed an early issue that some people experienced with the sound distorting at higher volumes.
Reasons to buy
The Aviator 900 ANC headphones offer a comfortable fit and strong overall performance in a unique, eye-catching design. They also seem to regularly go on sale for $200, which makes them significantly more affordable than the Sony WH-1000XM6 and other premium noise-canceling headphones.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
The headphones are fairly pricey, so you may want to wait for them to go on sale. They’ve dipped to as low as $200 during Amazon Prime Day, and I suspect we’ll see them sporadically discounted to near $200 as we head into the holiday buying season.
Pros
- Eye-catching, premium design is made out of premium material and is slightly slimmer and lighter
- Upgraded ear pads for more comfortable fit
- Upgraded biocellulose drive units powered by discrete amplifier improves the sound quality
- Improved noise canceling and voice-calling performance with 8 microphones
- USB-C audio for lossless wired connection
Cons
- Premium price ($50 more expensive than PX7 S2)
- Noise canceling isn’t quite up to the level of Sony’s and Bose’s
- Headphones fold flat but not up (no dual-hinge)
- At default setting, treble may be a touch too aggressive (forward) for some folks
Why I like them
Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 technically aren’t the company’s flagship headphones (the PX8 are), but they’re arguably better than the more expensive PX8s, offering improved sound quality and superior noise canceling in an upgraded, slimmer design (300 grams) that fits my head more comfortably. The drivers aren’t the same as the PX8’s carbon cone drivers, but the redesigned 40mm biocellulose drive units have an improved chassis, voice coil, suspension and magnet that, according to B&W, deliver «lower coloration and distortion, improved resolution and superior dynamics.» Additionally, for the first time in a set of B&W headphones, the drive units are powered by a dedicated, discrete headphone amplifier that provides more «scale and energy to the sound.» I did think their sound was more revealing and open compared to the earlier S2e, and they are more exciting and fun to listen to. At the default setting, the treble may be a touch aggressive for some folks (a tad too much sizzle), which can lead to some listening fatigue. But you can play around with the five-band equalizer in the companion app for iOS and Android to smooth things out and give the headphones a slightly warmer sound.
While these are pricey headphones, at least they look like premium headphones and are made with premium materials. In my tests in the noisy streets of New York, I found that the noise canceling is significantly improved — it’s better than PX8’s — though it’s not quite up to the level of what you get with Sony’s and Bose’s flagship noise canceling headphones. I also thought the voice-calling performance has been upgraded — the headphones have eight microphones total, four in each ear cup.
While callers said that the background noise reduction wasn’t quite as good as what they heard when I was talking to them on Sony’s WH-1000XM6 headphones, they said they could hear my voice well with minimal background noise.
It’s also worth noting that these headphones have USB-C audio for a lossless wired connection (and they also come with a 3.5mm analog cable that stows away nicely in a compartment inside the headphone’s hard case). Android users should note that they have support for Qualcomm’s aptX Adaptive and aptX Lossless audio codecs that can help improve sound quality when listening wirelessly over Bluetooth to high-resolution tracks from music streaming services like Tidal, Amazon and Qobuz. However, very few mainstream Android smartphones support aptX Adaptive or Lossless (more support Sony’s LDAC audio codec).
Reasons to buy
The sleekly designed, swanky Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3 are excellent noise-canceling headphones that are a clear improvement over their predecessor. That said, the biggest reason to buy these over Sony’s WH-1000XM6 headphones, which carry the same list price, is that you like their look better. They also feature USB-C audio, while the XM6 doesn’t.
Reason to skip/keep looking
From an aesthetic standpoint, I prefer the design of the PX7 S3 to the Sony WH-1000XM6’s. But I can’t say the PX7 S3 is any more comfortable or sounds better; I slightly preferred the sound of the Sony, in fact. And the Sony offers slightly better noise canceling and voice-calling performance, along with some extra features such as Speak-to-Chat and Quick Attention mode. If you already own the earlier PX7 S2e, it’s probably not worth shelling out full price for PX7 S3. The same is true if you own Bowers & Wilkins’ flagship PX8, which could get the S2 treatment in 2025. The PX7 S3 sounds more exciting than the PX8, but it’s debatable whether it sounds better. I would give the slight nod to the PX8, but that’s just my personal taste.
Pros
- More refined sound and even better noise canceling
- Slightly more comfortable
- Best-in-class voice call quality
- Robust feature set
Cons
- Higher price tag than the previous model
- Larger carrying case (headphones fold flat but not up)
When you have a product that a lot of people love, change can be risky. Such is the case for Sony’s WH-1000XM5, the fifth generation of the 1000X series headphones, which were first released in 2016 as the MDR-1000X Wireless and have become increasingly popular as they’ve improved with each generation.
Over the years, Sony has made some tweaks to the design, but nothing as dramatic as what it’s done with the WH-1000XM5. Other than the higher price tag, most of those changes are good, and Sony’s made some dramatic improvements with voice-calling performance, as well as even better noise-canceling and more refined sound.
Pros
- Well-designed and comfortable
- Excellent sound and noise-canceling
- Strong voice-calling performance
- Spatial audio with head-tracking
- USB-C audio
- TV Audio Swap feature for Sonos users
Cons
- Pricey
- Not Wi-Fi headphones
- TV Audio Swap feature only works with Sonos’ Arc sound bar at launch (and can be glitchy)
Why I like them
A lot of people expected Sonos’ first headphones to be able to stream lossless audio over Wi-Fi in your home and then use Bluetooth outside your Sonos home network. However, Sonos reps told me that listening to music over Wi-Fi would greatly reduce the headphone’s battery life and the company opted to leave that feature off. So even though they’re equipped with a Wi-Fi chip so you can tap into a Sonos sound bar at home for private late-night viewing (Sonos refers to this as the TV Audio Swap feature), they’re not really Wi-Fi headphones and are first and foremost noise-canceling Bluetooth headphones — and I was mostly quite impressed by them. Read my Sonos Ace review.
Sleekly designed, at 312 grams, they’re not as light as the 254-gram Sony WH-1000XM6s or the 253-gram Bose QuietComfort Ultras, but they’re considerably lighter than the 385-gram AirPods Max and I found them quite comfortable to wear, with a relatively small gap between the headband and my head (they hugged my head nicely with just the right amount of clamping). I also appreciated tat their chrome metal yoke allows the headphones to swivel in multiple directions — the hinge is hidden — and the ear cups adhere magnetically like they do on the AirPods Max and are replaceable, which is good.
All in all, the Sonos Ace headphones perform very well across the board with strong noise canceling, excellent sound quality and very good voice-calling performance. Well balanced, they’re clean sounding with nice detail and sparkle in the treble along with punchy, powerful bass that doesn’t get boomy. Vocals sounded natural and the headphones have a relatively wide soundstage. It’s also good to see that the headphones have USB-C audio support (wired listening with a USB-C cable) and spatial audio with head-tracking.
Reasons to buy
The Sonos Ace are one of the top noise-canceling headphones on the market, rivaling flagship models from Sony, Apple and Bose. Now that they’ve been out for more than a year, we’re seeing some good discounts on them, which makes them a better value, and a potential alternative to Sony’s new WH-1000XM6 headphones. While you don’t have to be an owner of Sonos speakers to buy them, Sonos soundbar owners can leverage the TV Audio Swap feature for private late-night viewing (the Ace delivers virtual surround sound in this mode).
Reasons to skip/keep looking
You can make the argument that Sony’s new WH-1000XM6 are slightly better overall for around the same price (I’m talking list price — and yes, they’re too pricey for some folks). But with the Ace selling for as low as $330, they’re an easier sell.
The Sony CH-720N is also available in black.
Pros
- Lightweight and comfortable
- Good sound with very good noise canceling
- Good voice-calling performance
- 35 hours of battery life
Cons
- No carrying case
- No ear-detection sensors
- No LDAC audio codec support
Why I like them
Sony’s improved entry-level noise canceling headphones, the CH-720Ns, have a bit of a plasticky budget vibe, but they’re lightweight (only 192 grams) and very comfortable. Part of me was expecting them to sound pretty mediocre, but I was pleasantly surprised, as these headphones offer good overall tonal balance with punchy bass, decent clarity and a fairly wide soundstage (the headphones are suitable for a variety of music genres. They also offers decent noise canceling and good voice-calling performance.
No, they don’t sound as good or perform as well as Sony’s WH-1000XM5 or new WH-1000XM6 headphones. But they sound more premium than they look — and feel — and their overall performance is a step up from their predecessor, the CH-710Ns. Are they worth $150? Maybe — or maybe not. But the good news is that, like the CH-710N and WH-XB910 before them, these frequently are discounted to closer to $100, which makes them a good value.
Reasons to buy
Budget-conscious buyers seeking Sony quality at an accessible price point will find these offer a significant step up from truly entry-level headphone options.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
The main reason not get these is that you simply want a more premium noise-canceling headphone that not only offers better build quality but better overall performance along with more advanced features like ear-detection sensors, LDAC audio codec support and Sony’s Quick Attention and Speak-To-Chat features. Sony also leaves out any sort of carrying case or pouch with these headphones, which is slightly disappointing.
Pros
- New smaller design
- Improved sound, noise canceling and voice calling
- Upgraded processors and drivers
Cons
- Pricey
- No Find My feature integrated into app
When Sony’s WF-1000XM4 earbuds came out in 2021, we awarded them a CNET Editors’ Choice. And while they’re excellent, we had some quibbles — they’re on the large side and aren’t a good match for certain ears. Clearly, Sony took those gripes to heart when it set out to design its next-generation WF-1000XM5 flagship noise-canceling earbuds. Not only are the XM5s smaller, but they also offer improved performance pretty much across the board, with better noise canceling, great sound quality and voice calling. Are the XM5s perfect? Not quite. At $300 — $20 more than their predecessor — they’re costly too. Overall they’re really impressive; among the very top earbuds on the market.
Pros
- Upgraded design
- Very comfortable
- Improved noise-canceling and sound quality
- Robust feature set
- Good voice-calling performance
- Smart Tx audio transmitter included
Cons
- Pricey
- Some people may find Smart Tx audio transmitter not that useful
Why I like them
JBL’s new flagship noise-canceling headphones, the Tour One M3 Smart Tx, are a nice step up from the company’s earlier Tour One M3. Not only are the more comfortable (they weigh 278 grams and have an upgraded ear cup design), but they feature better noise-canceling, slightly improved sound quality and good voice-calling performance. The headphones also come with an accessory that isn’t included with competing premium noise-canceling models: the JBL Smart Tx audio transmitter, which enables you to wirelessly deliver audio to the Tour One M3 from any USB-C or analog audio source such as an inflight entertainment system, PC, tablet or television. It has a touchscreen LCD that allows you to control the Tour One M3’s features, including music playback, call management and EQ Settings JBL says the Smart Tx — it’s rated for up to 18 hours of battery life — also has the ability to broadcast any audio source to an unlimited amount of Auracast-enabled devices.
JBL’s previous two Tour One models fell a little short of Sony’s and Bose’s premium noise canceling offerings. But its upgraded and more refined third-generation Tour One M3 headphones are more viable alternative to those models, though they would be more enticing if they were priced closer to $300. Equipped with newly designed 40mm Mica Dome drivers, the sound is well-balanced and dynamic, with well-defined bass and some sparkle in the treble. The mids, where vocals live, could sound a tad more natural and clear, you can make some tweaks to those aforementioned EQ settings to dial in a sound profile that’s optimized for your hearing and specific musical tastes. In the end, the Tour One M3 are very good noise-canceling headphones, with a robust feature set, including JBL Spatial Sound with head tracking, 8 mics (4 on and in each ear cup) and support for the LDAC audio codec for Android devices. Their only issue is that their sound and noise canceling doesn’t rise above the competition in this price range. So, as I said, they probably need to cost a $50-$100 less for someone to choose them over Sony, Apple or Bose.
Reasons to buy
JBL’s Smart Tx audio transmitter is a distinguishing feature and the headphones are nicely design and offer very good performance overall.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
From a sound quality perspective, the Tour One M3 aren’t quite as great as some other headphones in this price range, including the Sony WH-1000XM6 and Bowers & Wilkins PX7 S3.
Pros
- Sound quite good for their relatively low price
- Lightweight and relatively comfortable
- Decent noise canceling and voice-calling performance for a budget headphone
- USB-C audio (and wired mode with included cable)
- Support for LDAC audio codec
Cons
- ANC cuts off in wired mode
- No carry case or pouch included
Why I Like Them
QCY is another Chinese brand like Tribit, Earfun and plenty of others that make budget-priced headphones that sound better than you’d think they would for their relatively low price (the company says the Q stands for quality, C stands for creative and Y stands for youth). Its new-for-2024 H3 Pro headphones are similar to models in this price range from 1More, Tribit and Edifier, but they arguably sound a touch better and I found them relatively comfortable to wear, as they feature a lightweight design and memory foam ear pads.
The sound quality on these budget models tends to vary a bit from track to track. While I encountered some occasional distortion on badly recorded material and the treble just can’t produce the clarity and detail that you get with more premium headphones, all in all, the sound quality was quite respectable. The noise canceling also is fairly decent — there are a few different modes to choose from in QCY’s companion app for iOS and Android, which has a low-frills-looking interface but is robust enough under the hood — and callers said the voice-calling performance was also good, especially given the price of these headphones.
You do get multipoint Bluetooth pairing that allows you to connect two devices simultaneously (you have to activate it in the app), but features like wear sensors that pause your music when you take the headphones off are missing. Also, you can set the headphones to automatically turn off after not being in use for a certain amount of time (I set it for 15 minutes), but the headphones turned off in the middle of a long call I was making, not seeming to realize that I was using the headphones. The H3 Pro are decent value for the cost, particularly when their price dips closer to $50.
Reasons to buy
Like the handful of other budget headphones I recommend, the QCY H3 Pro are better than you’d think they’d be for their modest price in terms of both design and performance.
Reasons to skip/ keep looking
If you’re a critical listener, these probably aren’t for you as these headphones occasionally distort audio and lack the treble clarity found in higher-end models. Also, it’s too bad they don’t come with any sort of carrying pouch and noise cancelling isn’t available when using the cable for wired listening (you’d kind of want noise canceling if you watching a movie on a plane plugged into your seat’s inflight entertainment system).
Pros
- Significantly improved sound and noise canceling
- Better battery life and upgraded microphones
- Powered by Apple’s new H2 chip
Cons
- Basically the same design as previous model
- No high-resolution audio
The AirPods Pro (2nd generation) are powered by Apple’s new H2 chip, which delivers more processing power while being more energy efficient, according to Apple. The new chip, combined with new low-distortion drivers, allows for improved sound that offers better clarity and depth. The noise canceling is also improved — Apple says the new AirPods have «double» the noise canceling of the original AirPods Pro. Additionally, the new AirPods add an extra hour of battery, up from five to six hours with noise canceling on. Plus, a speaker in the case that emits a sound that helps locate your buds via Find My should they decide to hide from you.
Pros
- Significantly improved sound quality with better clarity, definition and tighter bass
- Durable, seamless faux-leather earpads for excellent comfort and acoustic seal
- Improved noise canceling and more natural sounding transparency mode
- Very good voice-calling performance
- Spatial audio with head tracking for Apple users
- USB-C audio for lossless wired listening
Cons
- Uses custom Beats chip rather than Apple’s H2 chip (limits future feature upgrades)
- No ear-detection sensors to automatically pause/resume audio
- USB-C listening mode disables noise cancellation and transparency features
Why I like them
Love ’em or hate ’em, Beats Studio headphones are among the most popular headphones of all time, launching as a wired headphone back in 2008. This is the fourth generation of them, and they carry the same list price as their predecessor and look very similar on the outside but have some big changes on the inside that make them significantly better headphones. I’m tempted to describe them as more affordable plastic versions of the AirPods Max. However, that’s not quite accurate due to a choice in chipsets and one notable missing feature. But read my full review to find out what makes this a very good headphone with some small caveats.
Reason to buy
The Studio Pros are the best Beats over-ear headphones, geared toward both Apple and Android users. Android users get multipoint Bluetooth pairing with automatic switching between devices linked to your Google account, while Apple users link to their iCloud account but have to manually switch between devices. For Apple users, there’s spatial audio with head tracking when watching videos and hands-free Siri access. IThose who prefer a more exciting, forward sound signature over more laid back options will find these appealing, and they should work well with a variety of music genres.
Reason to skip/keep looking
The one big miss here is the lack of ear-detection sensors — most $350 over-ear headphones have this feature, meaning your music doesn’t automatically pause when you take the headphones off. I also think it was a mistake for Beats not to power these with Apple’s H2 chip, as going forward you won’t get feature upgrades designed for that chip. Android users don’t get spatial audio with head tracking or hands-free Siri.
Pros
- Good value
- Comfortable fit
- Good sound for their low price
- Decent noise-canceling and voice-calling performance
Cons
- ANC disabled when in wired mode
- Lacking a bit of clarity
Why I like them
Earfun has made some very solid budget earbuds, and now it’s entered the full-size ANC headphone space with a few different over-ear models, including the Wave Pro (add the code EWPROCNET at checkout on Amazon to receive an additional 10% off). While they may not sound as good as premium noise-canceling headphones from Bose or Sony, they’re comfortable to wear, feature decent sound with punchy bass (they’re a bit lacking in clarity and bass definition compared to more expensive models), and they offer respectable noise canceling (you can toggle between two levels of ANC) and voice-calling performance. The headphones do come with a cable for wired listening — you can plug into an inflight entertainment system — but the noise canceling cuts off when you’re in wired mode, which is unfortunate.
Reasons to buy
For less than $60, you’re getting decent sounding headphones with effective noise canceling that are comfortable to wear and have long battery lfie. They’re also one of the few budget headphones that come with a carrying case.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
If you’re a critical listener, these probably aren’t for you as these headphones lack the treble clarity and bass definition found in higher-end models.
Pros
- Lightweight and comfortable
- Very good sound and noise canceling
- Good voice-calling performance
- Headphone cable now has integrated microphone
Cons
- Mostly the same as previous model but costs $50 more
Why I like them
When Bose released its new flagship QuietComfort Ultra Headphones in late 2023, it also replaced the QuietComfort 45s with a new, slightly updated model simply called the QuietComfort Headphones. Like the QC 45s, this model carries on the very comfortable tried-and-true legacy QuietComfort design that’s been around for a few generations that a lot of people continue to love. The QC Ultra Headphones add Bose’s new Immersive Audio feature and have a more refined design with some metal parts (they also have Bluetooth 5.3 instead of Bluetooth 5.1). But the QuietComfort Headphones still feature very good sound (the Ultras offer a small step up in sound quality), excellent noise canceling and strong voice-calling performance.
As for differences between these and the QC45s, Bose says it adjusted some of the electronics to improve battery life (now 24 hours vs. 22 hours) and adjusted the logos to make the products «visually distinguishable and more in line with its latest design language.» It also added an inline microphone to the auxiliary cable to «help with some users who may prefer a plug-and-play solution rather than Bluetooth pairing.» There’s also a Wind Block feature and some additional small performance improvements due to software upgrades. Finally, the headphones come in several new color options, including pink. Some colors may only be available at bose.com.
Reasons to buy
If you’re a fan of Bose’s earlier «iconic» headphones design starting with the QC35 (or maybe even the QC25), this is the Bose headphone for you. Cheaper than the QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, they also regularly go on sale for $250 or less, marking them a more attractive value.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
The QuietComfort Ultra Headphones are better headphones overall with improved all-around performance and a more premium design.
Pros
- Well-designed and comfortable to wear
- Good sound quality and noise-canceling performance
- Strong feature set
- Strong battery life
Cons
- Voice-calling suffers in windy environments
Why I like them
The well-designed and comfortable JBL Live 770NC offers some modest improvements over its predecessor, including better battery life (up to 65 hours with ANC off and 50 hours with ANC on) and Bluetooth 5.3 with LE Audio (via a future firmware upgrade). Equipped with 40mm drivers, you get bold, nicely defined sound with powerful bass that’s relatively tight. JBL’s Ambient Aware and TalkThru features are on board along with multipoint Bluetooth pairing (the one feature that’s missing is ear-detection sensors that pause your music when you take the headphones off). I thought the headphones’ noise muffling capabilities were good and callers said they could hear me well even in noisier environments except when the wind picked up around me. The headphones fold up and a simple carrying pouch (no hard case) is included along with a cable for wired listening.
Reasons to buy
If you can’t afford premium noise-canceling headphones from Bose, Sony and Apple, the JBL Live 700NC are a good alternative, offering good performance for a more modest price.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
These are easier to recommend when they’re on sale for less than $200 (or even less). They’re a bargain in the $150-$170 range.
The Bowers & Wilkins Pi8 in midnight blue.
Pros
- Great sound
- Smaller design with improved fit
- Improved noise canceling
- Smaller case transforms into a Bluetooth transceiver (it also has wireless charging)
- Very sensitive touch controls
Cons
- Expensive
- Some other premium earbuds have superior ANC and voice-calling performance
Why I like them
Simply put, the Pi8s are fantastic-sounding earbuds that also benefit from having a clearly improved design from the Pi7 S2 and Pi5 S2. It’s debatable whether the Pi8s sound $150 better than the step-down Pi6s, but there’s no doubt these are some of the best-sounding earbuds on the market, if not the best (everybody’s sound tastes vary so it’s hard to declare one set of buds the best-sounding overall).
Like with the Pi7 S2, sound quality is the highlight here, along with the charging case’s ability to transform into a Bluetooth transceiver. Noise cancellation seems improved, and noise reduction during calls seems better, but the voice-calling performance wasn’t as good as what I got with Apple’s AirPods Pro 2 and Samsung’s Galaxy Buds 3 Pro.
Reasons to buy
The Pi8 are easily among the top earbuds for sound quality with refined, spacious sound and deep, well-defined bass. Also, their noise-canceling and voice-calling performance has improved from their predecessor, making them better earbuds all around. And lastly, that their case turn into a Bluetooth transceiver is a nice feature for frequent travelers who want to use their wireless earbuds with an inflight entertainment system.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
The Pi8 are pricey earbuds that will be out of a lot people’s price range. And while models like the AiPods Pro 2 may not feature as impressive sound quality, they do offer slightly better noise canceling and voice-calling performance (and some other extra features) and cost less.
Pros
- Excellent sound
- Improved noise canceling and voice-calling performance
- Impressive battery life
- Good sound personalization features
Cons
- Ho-hum design
- Noise-canceling isn’t as good as Sony’s or Bose’s
Why I like them
Sennheiser’s previous-generation Momentum Wireless headphones have always had a pretty distinct look that was part retro, part modern and stood out for the exposed metal on their headband. For better or worse, that’s all gone now, and the new Momentum 4 Wireless, Sennheiser’s flagship noise-canceling headphones, look a bit more subdued and also a bit more like some of their competitors.
The Momentum 4 Wireless offers superior performance over the Momentum 3 Wireless in every regard, although the biggest gains are with noise canceling and voice-calling performance as well as battery life, which is outstanding — up to 60 hours at moderate volume levels. There’s also a transparency mode that allows ambient sound in, and they have the ability to create a custom sound profile in the Smart Control app for iOS and Android using the built-in EQ, sound modes and a new Sound Personalization feature that «assesses the user’s listening preferences and adjusts the listening experience according to their taste.»
Equipped with 42mm drivers, Sennheiser says the Momentum 4 Wireless offers «best-in-class» sound, which is debatable. I’d say the Momentum 4’s sound quality is right there with other models in this price range — they sound excellent, with the requisite well-defined, punchy bass, relatively wide soundstage (they sound pretty open) and smooth treble that brings out some of the finer details in well-recorded tracks. They’re a pleasure to listen to.
Reasons to buy
The Momentum 4 Wireless costs less than flagship models from Sony, Bose and Apple and offer excellent sound and good build quality.
Reasons to skip/keep looking
While I’m fan of the Momentum 4 Wireless and like their sound a lot, they’re noise canceling and comfort level isn’t as good as what you get from the Bose QuietComfort Ultra or Sony WH-1000XM5 or WH-1000XM6.
Factors to consider when choosing travel headphones
Budget
Before anything else, you’ll want to figure out how much you’re willing to spend on new travel headphones. The quality of value-priced noise-canceling headphones continues to improve, so you can find good affordable headphones for less than $100. The premium models, which offer better build quality and performance, tend to cost $200 or more — sometimes much more.
Fit (comfort)
It’s key that the travel headphones you buy fit your head well. They should offer a comfortable fit that’s snug yet not too snug. Ideally, you want headphones you can wear over a day with minimal breaks.
Durability
You want travel headphones that hold up well over time, so look for models that we note have sturdy build quality.
Maximize performance and features for your budget
You want the best-sounding headphones with the best noise-canceling, call quality and features for whatever fits your budget.
Return policy
It’s critical to buy your headphones at a retailer that has a good return policy, in case you have buyer’s remorse. Some people who are having trouble deciding between two models sometimes buy both, try them out for a few days and then return one.
How we test travel headphones and earbuds
We test travel headphones and earbuds based on six key criteria. These criteria include design, sound quality, noise-canceling performance, voice-calling performance, features and value.
- Design: Evaluating design, we assess not only how comfortable the headphones and earbuds fit (their ergonomics) but their build quality and how well the controls are implemented. When it comes to earbuds, we also look at water- and dust-resistance ratings.
- Sound quality: We evaluate sound by listening to a set playlist of music tracks and comparing the earbuds to top competing products in their price range. Sonic traits such as bass definition, clarity, dynamic range and how natural the headphones sound are key factors in our assessment.
- Noise-canceling performance: We evaluate noise-canceling performance by wearing headphones in the same spot indoors near a noisy HVAC unit to see how well they do at muffling lower frequencies. Then we head out to the streets of New York to test the headphones in a real-world environment where we see how they do at muffling not only street noise but people’s voices.
- Extra features: Some great-sounding noise-canceling headphones and earbuds aren’t loaded with features, but we do take into account what extra features are on board. These include everything from quick-access awareness to transparency modes (your music pauses and the headphones open up to the outside world so you can have a conversation) to special sound modes to ear-detection sensors that automatically pause your music when you take the headphones off your ears. We also take a look at the companion app for the headphones if there is one and how user-friendly it is.
- Voice-calling: When we test voice-calling performance, we make calls in the noisy streets of New York and evaluate how well the headphones or earbuds reduce background noise and how clearly callers can hear our voices.
- Value: We determine value after evaluating the strength of the headphones and earbuds against all these criteria and what they’re able to deliver compared to other models in their price class.
Other travel headphones we tested
Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds: Bose has released its improved QC Ultra Earbuds (2nd gen), which means you’ll be able to find discounts on the original QC Ultra Earbuds. They feature excellent sound and previously best-in-class noise-canceling performance.
Jabra Elite 8 Active Gen 2: Jabra billed these earbuds, which have unfortunately been discontinued, as the «world’s toughest earbuds,» and based on our tests (they survived several drops without a scratch), that may very well be true. While there are two new color options, the Gen 2 model doesn’t look any different from the original, but it includes an LE Audio smart case which allows wireless streaming from any device with USB-C or 3.5mm port. I tested it with inflight entertainment and it worked well, with no audio lag. The Elite 8 Active Gen 2 also feature enhanced spatial sound powered by Dolby Audio «for a better music experience,» enhanced Natural HearThrough for better awareness when outdoors and improved noise-canceling performance.
Beats Fit Pro: While the Beats Fit Pro technically aren’t AirPods, they’re built on the same tech platform as the AirPods Pro (yes, Apple owns Beats). Unlike Beats’ earlier and less expensive Studio Buds and new-for-2023 Studio Buds Plus, the Beats Fit Pro include Apple’s H1 chip and have most of the AirPods Pro’s features, including active noise canceling, spatial audio and Adaptive EQ. I’d venture to call them the sports AirPods you’ve always wanted. Learn more about the Beats Fit Pro with our hands-on review here.
JBL Live 670NC: The JBL Live 670NC is one of a relatively small number of on-ear headphones to offer active noise canceling. It’s something of a value model — no carrying case is included — but it does have memory foam ear pads that get you a comfortable fit for an on-ear headphone. Deliver clear sound with punch bass, it has 32mm drivers and improves on its predecessor’s battery life, offering up to an impressive 70 hours (or 44 hours with ANC on), and an extra three hours of battery with just five minutes of charge. This model includes the latest Bluetooth 5.3 (with LE Audio) and multipoint Bluetooth pairing. It also has JBL’s Ambient Aware (transparency mode) and TalkThru features. It’s available in black, white and blue and comes with a cord for wired listening.
Master & Dynamic MW75: The MW75 are Master & Dynamic’s best full-size headphones yet. Needless to say, they’re pricey at $599; most people will be quite satisfied with the $400 Sony WH-1000XM5, which is lighter and more comfortable and delivers best-in-class voice calling and noise canceling. The MW75’s build quality is hard to beat and they offer top-notch sound for a wireless model (I thought they sounded better than Apple’s AirPods Max headphones), plus strong voice-calling and noise-canceling performance. With their support for aptX Adaptive, they have additional appeal for Android users, who can get a touch better sound with the right setup. I was also quite happy streaming music with my iPhone 13 Pro using the AAC codec.
Master & Dynamic MW09: Master & Dynamic headphones and earbuds have always featured unique, eye-catching designs that include premium materials like aluminum, sapphire glass and Kevlar. Its latest MW09 flagship earbuds look pretty similar to its earlier MW08 buds, but have some upgrades on the inside that deliver better performance, particularly when it comes to battery life and noise canceling (it’s now very close to what Bose and Sony offer, although not quite at their level for ANC).
Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro: The Galaxy Buds 2 Pro offers improved noise canceling along with very good sound and voice-calling performance, plus support for high-resolution wireless audio streaming if you’re a Galaxy device owner with the right setup. Their biggest upgrade may be their new design and smaller size, which make them a better fit for more ears. Aside from their somewhat high price tag, their only drawback is that some of their key features only work with Samsung Galaxy devices. To find out their compatibility, check out our Samsung Galaxy Buds 2 Pro review.
Beats Studio Buds Plus: Alas, for those of you who bought the original Beats Studio Buds, which remain on the market for now, I’m sorry to report that these new Plus buds are significantly improved, with better sound, noise canceling and battery life. Additionally, they now deliver top-notch voice-calling performance. Read our full Beats Studio Buds Plus review for more information on the upgrade.
Google Pixel Buds Pro: The Pixel Buds Pro are Google’s first earbuds to feature active noise canceling. While it’s nice that they finally have a feature that most true-wireless earbuds have had for a while, what ultimately sets the Pixel Buds Pro apart and makes them worth considering — particularly for Android users — is their distinct design and winning fit. That helps enhance their performance on both the sound and noise-canceling fronts. While not quite elite for voice-calling, they also performed well as a headset for making calls. Read our Google Pixel Buds Pro review.
Travel headphones FAQ
Technologies
YouTube Will Let You Turn Off Shorts, but Only on Mobile
You can set a timer for bedtime or breaks, or just get rid of Shorts once and for all.
You can stop scrolling: YouTube just gave iOS and Android users the power to turn YouTube Shorts off completely.
YouTube’s short-form videos are similar to TikTok and Instagram Reels. The videos are designed to be quick bursts of content, but can lead to more screen time than you may have initially intended. YouTube is rolling out a solution, at least for those who use the YouTube mobile app.
The YouTube Shorts Timer lets you set how much time you want to spend watching YouTube Shorts. Or you can set the timer to zero to stop seeing YouTube Shorts altogether. Google has instructions to disable Shorts or enable the timer in the YouTube app. You can limit your Shorts scrolling session to 15, 30 or 45 minutes, or for an hour or two. When the timer is up, you’ll see a message that you’ve reached your set time limit, but you can dismiss it. Google also says you can set reminders for bedtime and breaks.
The ability to set the timer to zero minutes isn’t available for everyone yet. A Google spokesperson told CNET that the feature was made available first to parents linked to supervised accounts. It’s still rolling out to all other users.
As a parent, I’m relieved to know parents now have more control over screen time through Google’s Family Link, an app and website for Google and YouTube parental controls. It also makes me wonder what other screen-time controls could be on the horizon.
YouTube did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
A recent Pew Research Center study of teens who use TikTok, Snapchat and Instagram found that their screen time on these social media apps affects their sleep and productivity. Meanwhile, teens are using these apps for entertainment and say that the apps help their friendships — which could be important for teens. However, parental controls, app settings and other timers, like Brick, could help if you’re consistent and set schedules to have screen time without impeding on your time to rest or complete other tasks.
Last month, a California jury found YouTube and Instagram’s respective parent companies liable in a landmark civil case brought by a woman who claimed the apps were designed to be addictive to children. YouTube owner Google has said the platform is a streaming service, not a social media site, and plans to appeal.
YouTube says parents can use the timer to control how much time teens spend watching Shorts, including setting reminders for bedtime and breaks. Or parents can turn off Shorts in the YouTube mobile app by setting the timer to 0 minutes.
The feature is only available for mobile, so Shorts can’t yet be disabled on desktop. TikTok rolled out new time-management features last year, including a positive affirmations journal and missions to earn badges for reducing screen time.
Technologies
MacOS Now Has a Native Gemini AI App
Get faster access to some of Gemini’s best features without switching tabs.
Gemini is getting a native MacOS app so that you have a faster way to talk to Google’s AI chatbot, bringing access to some of its best features with just a couple of clicks.
Artificial intelligence is becoming more ingrained in everyday life, and companies are trying to make it easier than ever to access. On smartphones, AI is already just a button press away, but for desktops, LLMs like Google’s Gemini have been restricted to web applications.
With the new app, Gemini is available via a simple keyboard shortcut.
If you’ve got a MacBook, you can access Gemini at any time by pressing Option and Space on the keyboard, without having to switch tabs or open another window.
Gemini’s best features, like Nano Banana image generation, video and music generation, are also just a few clicks away.
Much like you can do with the Gemini mobile app, the new MacOS app will let you share context from a window instantly so you can get insight on the content you’re viewing. Google says this will also work with local files on your computer and isn’t limited to web pages.
The free, native app is available now for all users on MacOS 15 and up. Google says this is just the beginning and that it’s building the foundation for a «personal, proactive and powerful desktop assistant.»
The app can be downloaded at gemini.google/mac.
Technologies
I Wore the Whoop Band and the Apple Watch for Months and Found the Best Fit
The Whoop band won’t tell you the time, but it might change the way you work out. Here’s who should wear which.
I put off testing the Whoop band for six years. It’s a screenless fitness tracker built for serious athletes, and the sheer volume of training metrics always felt a little intimidating to me as a mere mortal.
The Apple Watch, on the other hand, is like that approachable friend who speaks to you on your level — much more my speed, six years ago.
But after seeing how many Whoop owners love the band, it was time to confront what intimidated me and see if it could outperform my Apple Watch Series 11. Two months later, the Whoop has transformed the way I work out and surfaced insights about my own body that weren’t on my radar before. Don’t mistake this for a breakup story — I’m not ditching my Apple Watch, yet.
The wearable space is evolving rapidly, with AI opening up the possibility of finally turning years’ worth of raw health and fitness data into actual advice. The standout smartwatches and trackers are now built around AI health coaches, proactive longevity features and metrics that respond visibly when you make the right changes.
As wearable sensors become more capable and health information gets more complex, the stakes are higher. It’s more important than ever to understand what each device does and which one will give you the most relevant information. That’s why just comparing specs won’t cut it. To make this personal, I had to literally become a test subject and wear both the Whoop MG band and my Apple Watch Series 11 long enough to unlock every single feature.
Comparing the Whoop band to an Apple Watch is like comparing a motorcycle to a minivan. They’re two different beasts that just happen to drive on the same street (your wrist). Health tracking is the main event for the Whoop, and likely the reason you’re considering it, whereas on the Apple Watch, it’s just one of the items on the menu. In an ideal world, you’d get both, but for this comparison, I’ll focus on the health features.
The price to play
The Whoop has two immediate red flags for me. WTF is this name? I’ve never answered so many «the what?» questions when asked what’s on my wrist. But that’s a superficial me-problem.
On the surface, the Apple Watch Series 11 costs more: $400 for the 42mm Wi-Fi model. The Whoop MG is $360. But that’s not a one-time payment. The Whoop band itself is just a bonus; what you’re really paying for is a subscription model that ranges from $199-359 yearly. The plan’s price determines which band model you get and what metrics you unlock.
Whoop subscription plans
| Plan name | Band included | Price per year | Battery life | Key features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One | Whoop 4.0 | $199 | 5 days | Core metrics: vitals and training scores |
| Peak | Whoop 5.0 | $239 | 14 days | Adds aging insights (Healthspan) |
| Life | Whoop MG | $359 | 14 days | Adds ECG and AFib detection |
Not everyone’s willing to commit to yet another subscription, and if you’re in it for the long haul, you could end up spending more than the cost of the Apple Watch. But the bigger filter might be compatibility: The Whoop is the only device compatible with both iOS and Android. The Apple Watch is locked to the iPhone only.
First impressions and a Whoop THONG?!
The fact that I’d never worn a Whoop band before gives the Apple Watch an unfair advantage, especially since it has a screen; the Whoop doesn’t. I’m used to glancing down at my wrist for a time check, so seeing something occupy space on my wrist that didn’t tell time was genuinely infuriating.
Whereas the Whoop doesn’t present any data on the actual band, the Apple Watch shows you the time, weather forecast, tides, stock price and more. You control which notifications you receive, but it demands your attention throughout the day, from stand reminders to Slack alerts. You can also use it as a wallet or a camera remote, making it more like a mini version of your iPhone that just happens to be watching out for your health.
I can see the Whoop’s lack of screen as an asset for minimalists who don’t want the noise. While it was easy to forget I was wearing it, the band doesn’t exactly fade into the background like a smart ring does. The Whoop’s sensor alone is almost the size of the Apple Watch’s screen, but has a thicker profile, which makes it bulkier when wearing to bed.
You can also camouflage the device more easily since the band sits over the sensor. Whoop offers a range of clasp and band materials, and even a $20 third-party starlight gray band made it feel more subtle on my wrist than the original black. The Apple Watch also has a wide selection of bands, but the screen is always front and center.
The Apple Watch is also mostly relegated to the wrist. The Whoop is more versatile in that it can take readings from different parts of your body, including your chest and lower back. That can be useful for athletes who can’t wear anything on their limbs or for amputees. Whoop even sells garments to hold the sensor in place, including a thong, though I still can’t wrap my mind around wearing any device below the belt; I’m clearly not the target audience. The only alternative I’d realistically use is the arm or bicep band for sleep.
Suffice to say, you won’t get that range of wear with the Apple Watch.
Similar metrics, different execution
The Whoop is built for long-term data analysis, so saying the band’s tracking strategy was a slow burn is an understatement. It takes at least a week to unlock most metrics, and two weeks of 24/7 wear to see the rest. The Apple Watch has real-time metrics that you can start using as soon as you strap it on.
Even once you unlock the data, the Whoop always uses your phone as the middleman to deliver it. But the app earns its keep by nudging you (via notifications) whenever a new metric is unlocked, or if something needs your attention. The Apple Watch also notifies you of trends in the iPhone’s Health app, but those nudges are less frequent, so I end up forgetting to look.
After two weeks of wear, the Whoop finally paid off
On the surface, the Apple Watch and Whoop measure similar biomarkers: heart rate, VO2 max, temperature, sleep and menstrual cycle. The difference is in what they do with that data. Apple gives you the numbers and some light guidance, but mostly leaves the interpretation up to you. Whoop collects the data and runs it through a single lens: How does this affect your training?
Sleep, heart rate and even your menstrual cycle phase get translated into a daily recovery score (how ready your body is to perform). Paired with a strain meter that tracks how hard you’ve pushed yourself, Whoop turns abstract data into a directive. On high-recovery, low-strain days, it pushes me to go harder. But the realities of parenting and work schedules don’t always align with my recovery score, and no amount of nudges can help me with that. There were times when a low recovery score convinced me I was too depleted for a hard workout (even though I could probably have pushed through). On other days, the score looked good, but my body was screaming the opposite.
The Apple Watch’s training load score measures workout effort, but it doesn’t tell you what to do with that info. It’s largely self-reported. Unlike the Whoop, which puts the strain score front and center in the app, Apple Watch training load trends are somewhat hidden in workout pages, so I don’t often remember to use it as guidance.
Both devices also track long-term trends such as VO2 max, or the measure of how efficient your body is at delivering oxygen to your muscles (a good indicator of cardiovascular health). Apple calls it Cardio Fitness score and surfaces it in the Health app. Whoop uses this metric (and other biomarkers) to calculate your «Whoop age,» how old your heart appears to be relative to your actual age, as well as your rate of aging. Not exactly a scientific term, but the effect is genius. Vanity and pride will get you invested in this number fast (at least it did for me).
Whoop’s health coach actually gets it
The shining star, though, is the Whoop AI coach. As a certified AI health coach skeptic, I never thought I’d be praising one, but here we are. The key is that it doesn’t require you to interact with it; Whoop AI just pops up on its own when it has something important to flag in the app or when you summon it. Two days before my period, it warned me that workouts might feel harder because of hormonal changes (spot on) and gave me concrete workout alternatives for those days when my recovery was low.
After an all-out 5K run, Whoop’s AI coach told me to take it easy for the next few days and not to push myself that hard more than once a week. In my black-and-white brain (before using the Whoop), every workout had to be all-out or it was simply not worth it. The coach pointed out that repeatedly spiking at peak heart rate might be working against my training. I did some non-AI-aided research myself and confirmed the AI coach was right. While raising your heart rate to peak occasionally can train your heart, sustained effort at this level increases your risk of injury.
The AI coach also adjusted my recommended bedtime based on strain, prior sleep debt (accumulation of sleep deprivation) and nightly patterns to optimize recovery. I don’t follow it most days, but the fact that it’s personalized and dynamic makes me less likely to ignore it than just the Apple Watch’s static bedtime reminder.
The closest Apple equivalent to Whoop’s AI coach is Workout Buddy, an in-ear trainer that motivates you in real time and contextualizes your effort against your data history. For runners like me, that kind of screen-free guidance is essential and it’s where the Apple Watch pulls ahead. I rely on heart rate zones, pace and distance cues in real time, and without a screen or in-ear guidance, there’s no way to do the same on the Whoop. I can surface live stats and strain in the Whoop app, but that still means staring at my phone when I should be watching the trail in front of me. Even Whoop’s workout summaries don’t include variables such as distance or pace.
Where Whoop holds its own is workout detection. Other screen-free wearables tend to miss lower-intensity sessions, but Whoop’s auto-detection has been spot on. The Apple Watch can detect some workouts automatically, but it’s less consistent and I usually end up starting them myself.
The CNET accuracy test
It’s one thing for these wearables to nail translating workouts into data, but now I had to make sure that data was accurate. I’ve run multiple accuracy tests on the Apple Watch, including a recent 30-mile cross-device testing blitz where it scored highest in heart rate tracking against five other smartwatches, outpacing even a Garmin watch.
I ran (literally) the same test on the Whoop using the Polar H10 chest strap for heart rate control.
After three miles, the workout summary showed accurate results. It was only two beats below my peak heart rate (179 Whoop vs. 181 Polar), and two beats below my average HR. Workout summaries only tell part of the story, missing all the peaks and valleys that happen in between. That’s why I prefer to dig into the raw data. Polar makes it easy to export the second-by-second HR data into a spreadsheet, but getting that data off the Whoop app proved impossible. Even if there happens to be a workaround, it will likely require sleuth-level digging. For an athlete-focused wearable, that was extremely disappointing. Getting your heart rate data off the Apple Watch isn’t easy, but it is possible either by downloading your entire history or (as I’d recommend) downloading this third-party app.
Health and safety features
For all the fancy metrics and AI coaching, the Apple Watch still pulls ahead on raw health and safety features. Both devices have an ECG feature and AFib detection, though on the Whoop, you’re paying for the top-tier Life membership to get them. The Apple Watch has FDA-cleared hypertension alerts that flag signs of high blood pressure, sleep apnea detection and high and low heart-rate alerts. The Whoop can also give blood pressure estimates, but that first has to be calibrated with a traditional cuff and is intended only as a wellness feature (it’s not clinically validated).
Where there’s no comparison at all is with emergency features. The Apple Watch has emergency SOS, fall detection, satellite connectivity (on 5G models) and crash detection that automatically contacts emergency services and your chosen contacts if something goes wrong.
It can also ping your phone, which may not seem like it’s health-related, but is certainly a mental health boon for me in the sense that it prevents me from losing my mind when I can’t find it.
Battery life is a no-brainer
Battery life isn’t even a competition. While the Apple Watch struggled to make it a day and a half on a charge, the Whoop powered through the two-week mark as promised without breaking a sweat. That means I’m far more likely to wear it around the clock. My patchwork charging strategy with the Apple Watch regularly leaves me with a dead battery before bed — or worse, before a workout. Does exercise even count if it wasn’t tracked?
The Whoop doesn’t even have to be taken off to juice back up, since the puck holds its own charge and snaps on for wireless top-ups. Unless you’re wearing it in your thong, of course, in which case I truly hope it’s coming off between washes.
The fact that it doesn’t have to come off my wrist means I’m more consistent at tracking my sleep. Since there are no gaps in my sleep data, all other data tied to it is more reliable, including menstrual tracking (which uses basal body temperature during sleep to detect ovulation). I’ve been tracking my cycle for 10 years and know it well enough to say the Whoop has been spot-on with its estimates. The Apple Watch also tracks my menstrual cycle, but calculates ovulation retroactively if you’ve been consistent with sleep tracking (which is when it measures temperature changes). That consistency has been harder for me on the Apple Watch, so my ovulation estimates aren’t as accurate on the Apple watch. If you want a tracker you can truly set and forget about on both the notification and charging front, Whoop is your pick.
Apple Watch vs. Whoop: Bottom line
Despite being a longtime Apple Watch wearer, I’m not itching to take the Whoop off my wrist. It’s one of the few wearables I’ve worn for 14 consecutive days that hasn’t irritated my skin. I’d consider keeping both if it weren’t for Whoop’s subscription cost and my fear of financial commitment. Currently, you can get the One membership for $149 ($50 off).
The Whoop band has given me valuable insights about my training habits and flagged trends about my own body I hadn’t even put together myself — hey there, hormonal fatigue. The AI coach gets sharper the longer it knows you, which means I’m actually invested in sticking with it and following its advice.
But realistically, I’m still in the thick of raising young kids while holding down a demanding job, and fitness has to take a back seat. Sticking with the Whoop would be like paying for a fancy gym membership and only using it twice a month. For anyone in a different stage of life looking to level up their fitness and optimize for peak performance (without real-time guidance), the Whoop is likely a worthy investment. I’ll join your ranks soon enough.
Maybe the fact that I’m paying for it would hold me accountable, and I’d find a way to prioritize the guidance more often? Or maybe our timing’s just off? For now, I’ll stick with the dependable friend, the Apple Watch, who doesn’t drop knowledge at every turn, but speaks my language and shows up when I need it — whether it’s pointing out I’m running late, or letting me dictate a text while wrangling a toddler.
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
-
Technologies4 года agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days


