Connect with us

Technologies

YouTube Cracks Down on Premium Family Plans Used at Different Addresses

Your YouTube Premium or Music family plan could be paused if all users aren’t watching from the same home.

Sharing a YouTube Premium or YouTube Music family plan with people who don’t live at your address could soon cost you the perks you’re used to. Several users have reported receiving warnings that their accounts will be paused within 15 days if they don’t comply with YouTube’s rules on family plans.

The policy isn’t new. YouTube required family plan members to share the same household in 2023 but it looks like enforcement is stepping up. If you lose Premium, you can still stream videos and listen to music with ads but you’ll have to deal with ads and fewer features, which is a big downgrade for most people.

If you’re currently splitting an account across multiple locations, now’s the time to check the fine print. YouTube is making it clear: Premium is for households only and ignoring that rule could mean losing the ad-free experience entirely.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source on Chrome.


A YouTube spokesperson told CNET, «Our family plan policy hasn’t changed and we are continuously enforcing it. You can learn more about the YouTube family plan here

On its support page, YouTube says that an account manager can add up to five family members in a household to their Premium membership. But, the post says, «Family members sharing a YouTube family plan must live in the same household as the family manager.» Groups can only be changed once every 12 months.

YouTube has been testing a two-household plan that would offer a discount for those who want to share, but that plan is not yet available in the US.

YouTube offers a one-month trial for its Premium and Music accounts, which cost $23 per month.

Subscription sharing crackdowns

YouTube joins other paid services that have started to enforce policies to cut down on the sharing of premium services.

Disney Plus and Netflix were among the services that began discouraging, and then actively blocking or restricting accounts they find are sharing passwords. Max joined them this year, introducing an $8 fee for those who want to share their account with one other person.

Similarly, Amazon is ending a program that allowed for sharing of its Prime service, requiring that those who don’t live at the same residence use their own paid Prime accounts for things like getting packages shipped free. Amazon’s Prime Invitee benefit-sharing program is ending Oct. 1.

The enforcement is meant to help recover revenue that these companies say they lose when people use someone else’s premium account instead of paying for their own. 

«It’s not hard to understand why streaming services feel the need to crack down. After all, the revenue to spend on new content or an improved experience must come from somewhere,» says Carl Lepper, Senior Director of Technology, Media & Telecom (TMT) Intelligence at JD Power.

«The calculation from streaming companies seems to be that limiting password sharing and account access will lead to more subscribers. You could argue the same about any sort of subscription service. It’s fairly intuitive. There’s a solid amount of evidence from media coverage that it works, at least initially,» Lepper says.

Does it work long-term? Lepper tells CNET that companies have to balance enforcing their policies without «ticking off» existing customers or denying potential customers from getting a chance to see what their service has to offer and potentially converting to their own account eventually.

Enforcement itself isn’t free, he points out. «Streamers themselves need to devote time and resources to enforcing such a policy,» Lepper says.

Technologies

Tim Cook Stepping Down? Apple CEO’s 65th Birthday Today Sparks Succession Talk

Apple is no doubt considering who it will choose to fill the chief executive role once Tim Cook decides to retire. Here are a few potential candidates reportedly being considered.

With Tim Cook turning 65 on Saturday, Nov. 1, talks have been growing around the question of who his successor as Apple CEO could be, should he choose to retire. Cook has made no announcement that he’ll be stepping down, but according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, the tech giant is working behind the scenes to ensure a seamless transition when the time does come.

Cook replaced Steve Jobs in 2011, and after a period of uncertainty, Cook ushered Apple into its most profitable era. Stock-watching website Stocktwits reports that the company’s stock has increased by around 1,800% since Cook took over leading the company.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


Jobs may have introduced devices like the iPhone into everyday use that changed how we interact with technology, but Cook expanded on the Apple experience. Under his guidance, the company built upon Apple’s smartphone by introducing subscription services and more mobile products, including earbuds and wearables.

He introduced Apple Pay, Beats headphones became part of the company’s ecosystem, the Apple Watch launched 10 years ago, and Apple even entered the entertainment business, producing original Oscar-winning movies and Emmy-winning TV shows through Apple TV Plus.

Read more: Best iPhone in 2025: Here’s Which Apple Phone You Should Buy

We should reiterate that the notion of Cook stepping down is pure speculation at this point. We don’t know what Apple’s CEO is currently planning or what his thoughts about retirement may be. That said, there are a handful of contenders who have reportedly been part of the succession conversation. 

Potential Apple CEO contenders

Apple likely has «a solid bench of successors» that the company’s board has been developing, says Bryan Ma, VP of Devices Research at IDC.

«But the anxiety gets amplified when there isn’t clear visibility for such a valuable and iconic company,» Ma says. «Compounding the challenge is the fact that the bar has been set by big rock stars like Steve Jobs and Tim Cook. The next generation of leaders have very big shoes to fill.»

John Ternus, Apple’s current vice president of Hardware Engineering, was top of Gurman’s list. Ternus has been with the tech giant for more than two decades, so he has the knowledge and experience for a chief executive upgrade. There would be value in having an engineer behind the wheel. 

Ternus appeared during the September Apple event to introduce the iPhone Air. At 50, he’s the same age Cook was when he took over as Apple CEO.

Other potential contenders are also being considered, including Craig Federighi, Apple’s senior vice president of software engineering; Greg Joswiak, Apple’s senior vice president of worldwide marketing; and Jeff Williams, the company’s former chief operating officer, according to a report by Apple Insider. On Oct. 10, Bloomberg reported that Federighi also will soon be overseeing the Apple Watch operating system watchOS, while Ternus will be overseeing Apple Watch hardware engineering once Williams departs at the end of the year.

Federighi has been with Apple for a long time and has the public speaking experience — frequently speaking during Apple Events — that would be vital if he replaced Cook as CEO. Considering his current role, Joswiak has a more marketing perspective and a broader overview of the company and may not be as hands-on with the tech as Ternus and Federighi. And according to Gurman, Williams was viewed as a shoo-in to be Cook’s replacement until his role as COO was announced to be ending. (He’s now Apple’s senior vice president of design, watch and health.) Cook held the position of chief operating officer before he replaced Jobs as CEO in 2011. Sabih Khan will be stepping into that COO role, which also puts his name in the running.

When Cook steps down, Apple will undoubtedly have a pool of qualified talent to choose from to take up the leadership mantle. Who exactly will take the mantle remains to be seen.

Apple didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Continue Reading

Technologies

I Went Hands-On With the OnePlus 15’s Camera and You Need to See the Results

What better first test run than taking it on a neighborhood photo safari?

The OnePlus 15 is the next premium handset from the Chinese phone-maker, and I just got my hands on it. To give its cameras a whirl, I took it out for a quick spin through a hip corner of Los Angeles.

The OnePlus 15’s big advantage is that it’s one of the first to run the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Qualcomm’s next-generation chip for high-end phones, which was launched in September. The system-on-a-chip has a big influence on how photos come out, processing every image captured through the rear cameras. 

The OnePlus 15 has three 50-megapixel rear cameras, along with a selfie shooter on the front, and I took photos of my neighborhood flora and fauna using them all. While there’s a certain level of polish expected of premium phone cameras, this phone has something new: it’s the first major OnePlus handset released since the company’s partnership with Hasselblad ended. For years, OnePlus incorporated the iconic Swedish camera maker’s color science and image calibration in its cameras.

With Hasselblad gone, the OnePlus 15 features the debut of the DetailMax Engine, a loftily-titled computational processing system that aims to «present scenes as they truly are, without over-beautification or distortion,» as the company’s official blog post explained. 

That means a new page for shooting photos on a OnePlus phone, which made me want to know what the OnePlus 15 is capable of. Join me through a casual tour of a vibrant Los Angeles neighborhood, taking the kinds of snapshots that make up the majority of everybody’s camera roll. I’ll need to spend a lot more time with the device to give it a comprehensive review. 

Our first shot is of the outside of The Silver Lake House, a neighborhood Thai restaurant. While I clearly can’t resist a slight Dutch angle here, the blend of colors look distinct and not oversaturated — a win for true-to-life processing. I like the way the OnePlus 15 captured the light and shadows filtering through the trees, and the camera has handled the lens flare well without over-exposing that area. Also, notice the reflection on the chrome on the heat lamp.

Here’s a close-up of knick-knack plant vases on a windowsill overlooking the restaurant’s indoor tables. The light is really balanced, bright on the foreground outside the eatery and dimmer within — but colors and details are still visible inside. You can also pick out some detail in the reflections on the window of the street behind me.

I couldn’t resist this 1960s Ford Thunderbird sitting idly on the street, a cruising car from yesteryear resting in a hipper corner of LA. Note the texture of the dirt streaks over the paint contrasted against the shiny chromed metal surrounding the taillights. More importantly, despite the camera’s focus on the foreground, the OnePlus 15  still manages to capture the blue sky in the background, complete with details in the clouds.

I took this photo of a nearby dog park with the ultrawide lens, which preserves humdrum details in the brown dirt amid sprouted grass along the bottom.

Here’s an image of the same dog park that I took while zoomed in at 7x magnification. It has a lot of detail and color. But we can go further!

Here’s the dog park photographed at 120x magnification, the farthest this phone can zoom in. The image looked grainy as heck on the phone’s screen when I shot it, but that DetailMax Engine’s post-processing has done relative wonders, making this semi-recognizable despite a lot of smudging at the edges caused by noise reduction — look between the chain links. To be sure, this is not a great image — it’s nearly painterly — but the fact that it can zoom in this far and still serve up a photo with something recognizable is amazing.

Here’s a selfie featuring yours truly. I think this photo has good detail and shadow, but what most impresses me are the mountains in the distance, which can be seen to some degree through the classic Los Angeles haze (marine layer, not smog) occluding the air, not the OnePlus selfie camera.

For comparison, here’s a selfie I took at night. The color is fine, with decent details in the foreground, though they start to blur behind me — notice the bricks on the bottom right, the posters on the light pole on the mid-left, and especially the building over my shoulder.

Here’s the obligatory night shot of a Los Angeles street. While the city will never be dark enough to test the phone’s ability to capture constellations of stars in the night sky, this does show the contrast between warm streetlights and the bright neon. The details of the stucco pockmarked the walls of the bowling alley are clear, even from across the street. Look closely at the texture of the street’s pavement. It’s a granular mix of grays flecked with white spots. All the grime of the city, preserved by the OnePlus 15’s new shiny cameras.

That’s it for the first look at the OnePlus’ camera capabilities. Happy Halloween! And keep an eye out for my full OnePlus 15 review.

Continue Reading

Technologies

A $20K Humanoid Robot to Help Around the House? The Price Isn’t the Only Caveat

The new Neo robot from 1X is designed to do chores. It’ll have to learn a lot from you — and about you.

It stands 5 feet, 6 inches tall, weighs about as much as a golden retriever and costs near the price of a brand-new budget car. 

This is Neo, the humanoid robot. It’s billed as a personal assistant you can talk to and eventually rely on to take care of everyday tasks, such as loading the dishwasher and folding laundry. 

Neo doesn’t work cheap. It’ll cost you $20,000. And even then, you’ll still have to train this new home bot.

If that sounds enticing, preorders are now open (for a mere $200 down). You’ll be signing up as an early adopter for what Neo’s maker, a California-based company called 1X, is calling a «consumer-ready humanoid.» That’s opposed to other humanoids under development from the likes of Tesla and Figure, which are, for the moment at least, more focused on factory environments. 

Neo is a whole order of magnitude different from robot vacuums like those from Roomba, Eufy and Ecovacs, and embodies a long-running sci-fi fantasy of robot maids and butlers doing chores and picking up after us. If this is the future, read on for more of what’s in store.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


What the Neo robot can do around the house

The pitch from 1X is that Neo can do all manner of household chores: fold laundry, run a vacuum, tidy shelves, bring in the groceries. It can open doors, climb stairs and even act as a home entertainment system.

Neo appears to move smoothly, with a soft, almost human-like gait, thanks to 1X’s tendon-driven motor system that gives it gentle motion and impressive strength. The company says it can lift up to 154 pounds and carry 55 pounds, but it is quieter than a refrigerator. It’s covered in soft materials and neutral colors, making it look less intimidating than metallic prototypes from other companies.

The company says Neo has a 4-hour runtime. Its hands are IP68-rated, meaning they’re submersible in water. It can connect via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and 5G. For conversation, it has a built-in LLM, the same sort of AI technology that powers ChatGPT and Gemini.

The primary way to control the Neo robot will be by speaking to it, just as if it were a person in your home.  

Still, Neo’s usefulness today depends heavily on how you define useful. The Wall Street Journal’s Joanna Stern got an up-close look at Neo at 1X’s headquarters and found that, at least for now, it’s largely teleoperated, meaning a human often operates it remotely using a virtual-reality headset and controllers. 

«I didn’t see Neo do anything autonomously, although the company did share a video of Neo opening a door on its own,» Stern wrote. 

1X CEO Bernt Børnich told her that Neo will do most things autonomously in 2026, though he also acknowledged that the quality «may lag at first.»

What you need to know about Neo and privacy

Part of what early adopters are signing up for is to let Neo learn from their environment so that future versions can operate more independently. 

That learning process raises privacy and trust questions. The robot uses a mix of visual, audio and contextual intelligence — meaning it can see, hear and remember interactions with users throughout their homes. 

«If you buy this product, it is because you’re OK with that social contract,» Børnich told the Journal. «It’s less about Neo instantly doing your chores and more about you helping Neo learn to do them safely and effectively.»

1X says it’s taking steps to protect your privacy: Neo listens only when it recognizes it’s being addressed, and its cameras will blur out humans. You can restrict Neo from entering or viewing specific areas of your home, and the robot will never be teleoperated without owner approval, the company says. 

But inviting an AI-equipped humanoid to observe your home life isn’t a small step.

The first units will ship to customers in the US in 2026. There is a $499 monthly subscription alternative to the $20,000 full-purchase price, though that will be available at an unspecified later date. A broader international rollout is promised for 2027.

Neo’s got a long road ahead of it to live up to the expectations set by Rosie the Robot in The Jetsons way back when. But this is no Hanna-Barbera cartoon. What we’re seeing now is a much more tangible harbinger of change.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media