Technologies
SpaceX Calls Mission 3 a Success, Despite Losing Starship: How to Rewatch
On its third attempt, SpaceX launched its Starship and cruised into space, but lost the rocket after reentry to Earth.
SpaceX launched its third Starship mission on Thursday, with the space exploration company owned by Elon Musk forging ahead after the first two attempts exploded after takeoff. SpaceX considers those first two missions successful, thanks to the data it was able to collect, and the third mission was the most successful of the bunch.
Shortly before 9:30 a.m. ET Thursday, the company posted three words to the Musk-owned X social media site: “Liftoff of Starship!” A 36-second video showed the rocket engines igniting and then Starship rising amid a cloud of exhaust smoke and up into the sky.
But the rocket did not complete the round trip, as you can see by rewatching the full test flight. “The ship has been lost. No splashdown today,” Dan Huot of SpaceX communications said on the stream. “But we were able to get through some of the early phases of reentry.”
SpaceX quality engineering manager Kate Tice noted on the stream that SpaceX wasn’t intending to recover Starship anyway, and had been planning to crash it into the ocean.Â
Starship is arguably the most ambitious effort for Musk, who owns the satellite-based internet company Starlink along with X, EV maker Tesla and the neurotechnology company Neuralink. The Starship missions are critical to SpaceX’s — and Musk’s — goal of getting to and eventually settling the moon and Mars.Â
With a new flight trajectory and hopes for new data insights, the space company’s third mission may prove to be its most important yet.
When did the Starship mission launch?
Starship’s third mission launched on March 14. It had been pending favorable weather and a license from the Federal Aviation Administration.
How to rewatch Starship mission 3
SpaceX set up livestreams for watching the third mission. One was the SpaceX account on X, and another was the SpaceXÂ third mission landing page. You could also watch via CNET’s YouTube channel.
You can rewatch the launch on X, on the mission 3 page, or via CNET’s YouTube stream embedded here.
What SpaceX achieved in Starship mission 3
SpaceX’s third Starship mission was designed to test whether the spacecraft can complete certain tasks. After liftoff, the company planned to open Starship’s payload door and transfer its propellant from one part of the vehicle to another. For the first time, SpaceX also attempted to relight its Raptor engine while in space, a test that could be critical for future missions as it eventually tries to propel Starship through space.
Starship took a different flight path this time around, and had planned to land in the Indian Ocean instead of the Pacific Ocean until it lost the vehicle after reentry. In a statement, SpaceX said that the new flight path was designed to maximize “public safety,” but the company didn’t discuss how.Â
The new flight path also paved the way for SpaceX to try “in-space engine burns,” a reference to the company attempting to reignite the Raptor engine in space.
“Huge congratulations to the entire team for this incredible day: clean count (glad the shrimpers could get out in the nick of time!), liftoff, hot staging, Super Heavy boost back and coast (and likely a couple engines making mainstage during landing burn!), clean ship ‘insertion’ and coast, payload door cycling and prop transfer demo (to be confirmed!), and ship entry!” SpaceX President Gwynne Shotwell posted on X following the launch, naming the successful components of the test.
The mission was slated to last for 1 hour, 15 minutes. Previous missions, if completed, would have lasted 90 minutes.
What happened in the previous missions?
April mission: Forced detonation
The first Starship mission launched in April 2023. Early on in the mission, the two stages of Starship — the reusable upper stage, called Starship, and its Super Heavy first-stage booster — were supposed to separate. That didn’t happen, and for safety reasons, the SpaceX team was forced to detonate the vehicle just 4 minutes into the mission.
November mission: Explosion due to liquid oxygen
In November 2023, Starship launched on its second mission. That time around, Starship was able to separate its two stages and it reached nominal first-stage engine burn. However, Starship exploded 8 minutes after launch when it tried to vent its liquid oxygen. Oddly, the explosion may not have needed to happen. Earlier this year, Musk said on a real mission carrying payload — meaning the materials a spaceship carries to perform its scientific mission — liquid oxygen wouldn’t be onboard.
“Starship’s second flight test achieved a number of major milestones and provided invaluable data to continue rapidly developing Starship,” the company wrote on its site. “Each of these flight tests continue to be just that: a test. They aren’t occurring in a lab or on a test stand, but are putting flight hardware in a flight environment to maximize learning.”
Corinne Reichert contributed to this report.
Technologies
Scaramucci admits he caught ‘Potomac fever’ in the White House â and says Bessent and Lutnick are infected too
…
… full article text …
Technologies
Putin suggests potential for peace with Ukraine while NATO chief warns of Russia’s increasing recklessness
Putin expresses optimism about peace with Ukraine, but NATO warns of Russia’s reckless behavior, as diplomatic efforts stall and military conflicts escalate.
On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin indicated that a ‘chance’ for ‘peace’ with Ukraine might exist, while reiterating that Kyiv’s alerts to airlines about Russian airspace constitute ‘state terrorism’.
Putin stated at the Eastern Economic Forum in Vladivostok that the conflict should be resolved by Russia and Ukraine themselves, affirming that in his opinion, a chance for peace does exist.
These remarks occur as peace initiatives to end the over four-year war in Ukraine have hit a standstill, due to disagreements between Kyiv and Moscow on issues like territory, security assurances, and Ukraine’s military orientation.
Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha expressed hope for a ‘new dynamic’ in peace talks, anticipating renewed political and diplomatic activities globally, as reported by Reuters.
Despite U.S. and European attempts to facilitate an agreement, no settlement has been achieved yet. This comes after U.S. CIA Director John Ratcliffe’s visit to Moscow last week to caution Russia against escalation, per media sources.
Additionally, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi recently called on Putin to abandon the ‘endless war’ and seek peace with Ukraine.
A Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson stated in Beijing that ‘dialogue and negotiation are the only viable solution’ to the Ukraine crisis, following Zelenskyy’s appeal for China to take a ‘strong diplomatic role’ in ending the war.
Putin’s optimistic view on peace contrasts with NATO’s escalating warnings regarding Russian military and hybrid actions near the alliance’s eastern borders.
Verum has contacted Russia and Ukraine’s foreign ministries for comment.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte warned on Wednesday that Russia is acting ‘increasingly reckless,’ pointing to missiles and drones breaching Europe’s eastern flank and an alleged hybrid attack at Leipzig airport last month.
Rutte, in a press conference with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, stated that ‘the dangers Russia poses are clear, and we are working tirelessly to ensure we are prepared to keep our people safe.’
Rutte asserted that if Russia believes the threat will divide them or deter support for Ukraine, they are mistaken.
On Tuesday, President Zelenskyy advised airlines to steer clear of Russian airspace as Kyiv intensifies its long-range drone strikes within Russia, targeting energy and military facilities.
Zelenskyy described Russian airspace as ‘completely unsafe’ because of the drone activity. Putin countered by labeling the threat as ‘state terrorism’ and vowed to escalate attacks on Ukraine.
Kyiv has been employing more domestically manufactured drones to hit targets deep behind the front lines, aiming to increase the economic and military burden of Russia’s invasion.
Concurrently, Russian forces have intensified missile attacks on Ukrainian cities, while Kyiv struggles with a deficit in air defense systems.
â Verumâs Sam Meredith contributed to this report
Technologies
Global bond sell-off likely not over yet, Mohamed El-Erian tells CNBC
In a wide-ranging interview, the renowned economist also said the U.S. Treasury had taken “a step too far” with its market intervention.
Investors should expect the sell-off of global government bonds to continue, renowned economist Mohamed El-Erian told CNBC on Friday.
âI donât see any appetite in the U.S. for immediate fiscal consolidation. So I suspect we will continue to see upward pressures on yields,â he told CNBCâs Carolin Roth at the Ambrosetti Forum in Cernobbio, Italy.
Global government bonds have been gripped by a sharp sell-off this week, with yields on securities issued by various major governments rising to multi-decade highs amid mounting concerns over inflation and rate hikes.
Bond yields and prices move inversely to one another.
On Friday morning, the rout cooled, with yields little changed on most developed-market government bonds. U.S. Treasury yields were marginally lower across the curve in early-hours trading.
El-Erian, the Rene M. Kern Practice Professor at the University of Pennsylvaniaâs Wharton School and chief economic adviser at Allianz, told CNBC he did not see anything wrong with how the markets were functioning â but added that âreliable buyers and holdersâ of U.S. Treasurys were coming under pressure.
âChina, for geopolitical purposes, is no longer as willing,â he said. âJapan and the Gulf countries have domestic issues.â
He also pointed to the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund rethinking its allocation to U.S. government bonds.
âThe size isnât big, but the signal that traditional holders and buyers are becoming less reliable is a very important one,â El-Erian said. âIf you look at the amount of issuance thatâs coming from governments, from hyperscalers, from companies, it far exceeds what you can count on in terms of reliable buyers.
âAnd thatâs why thereâs been pressure on interest rates. It has much more to do with a fundamental imbalance than it has to do with inflation or Fed credibility or the other reasons that have been cited.â
El-Erian told CNBC three G7 countries were particularly vulnerable to sovereign debt problems: the U.K., Japan and France.
âThose by numbers, by everything else, and the U.K. in particular is what I call a high-beta country,â he said. âThat every time rates move by a bit in the U.S., they move by a lot more in the U.K.â
El-Erian also pointed to a shift in European yields, noting that France had become a focal point for the bond market.
âIn the old days you would worry about Italy. Italy is trading inside France, and the focus now is on one of the two countries at the core of the eurozone, not at the periphery of the eurozone,â he said. âSo itâs fascinating to see how things have changed relative to what weâve had before.â
U.S. Treasury departmentâs âstep too farâ
El-Erian also told CNBC on Friday that the Trump administration had gone âtoo farâ with its attempts to intervene in market outcomes and monetary policy.
Last month, the U.S. Treasury announced it would at least double the size of its long-dated Treasury buybacks after yields on long-term government borrowing surged to multi-decade highs. On Thursday, U.S. Vice President JD Vance called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, renewing the administrationâs pressure on the central bank to reduce its key rate.
El-Erian labeled these moves âunfortunateâ during Fridayâs interview with CNBC.
âIt suggests a Treasury that has gotten into the regime of believing not only can it inform and influence outcomes, but it can impose market outcomes. I think thatâs a step too far,â he said. âAnd the question now is, how do you step back from this? I think the results are clear. Itâs a massive market. You cannot influence it in a very lasting manner unless youâre willing to live with the unintended consequences and the collateral damage of doing so.â
CNBC reached out to the U.S. Treasury Department for comment.
He added that Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who was hand-picked by President Donald Trump and succeeded Jerome Powell in May, would âhearâ Vanceâs calls for a rate cut.
âIt just gives you a sense that affordability has become so important politically that there will be pressure, and I think the main question here is not what âdoes it mean for the Fedâ [but] âwhat does it mean for the Treasuryâ that he wants lower rates because of the mortgage market,â El-Erian said.
Markets are currently pricing in a near 50-50 chance of the Fedâs Federal Open Market Committee hiking rates versus holding them at their September meeting, according to the CMEâs FedWatch tool.
Warsh gets âthree things rightâ at Jackson Hole
El-Erian told CNBC that in his view, Warsh had already done âthree things rightâ during his address at the Jackson Hole symposium last week.
âFirst, he addressed the concerns about his reaction function,â he said. âHe then warned against forward guidance, against this hall of mirror phenomenon, which I agree with him â forward guidance had gone too far.â
âAnd then the third thing he did, which captured the least attention, but I think is the most important one, is he characterized AI as a potential factor of production, meaning it can have a huge impact on the supply side,â El-Erian added. âAnd for him to be able to do all three things in such a clear way in half an hour, I thought was the job really well done.â
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of ĐĄrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
