Connect with us

Technologies

Maritime Battlegrounds from the Black Sea to Hormuz are Defining a ‘New World Order’

As maritime corridors like the Strait of Hormuz and the Black Sea become modern battlegrounds for drones and missiles, global shipping is facing a permanent shift in logistics and cost structures.

The Strait of Hormuz is destabilizing global commerce, yet this waterway is merely one instance of a critical maritime corridor transforming into a combat zone in an era defined by missiles and drones targeting economic lifelines.

From the Red Sea and the Strait of Hormuz to the Black Sea, strikes on merchant ships have hampered trade, spiked freight and insurance expenses, and compelled shipping firms to re-evaluate routes previously considered reliable.

The implications are massive: approximately 80% of the world’s merchandise trade by volume is transported via sea. Any disruption to a major route can cause cargo delays, tighten global supplies, and inflate the cost of food, energy, and consumer products across the globe.

The Impact of Drones on Naval Warfare

“We are facing a new war and a new chokepoint,” David Roche, a global strategist and president at Quantum Strategy, noted in a July report. He was referring to the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, where Ukrainian drone strikes have targeted Russian tankers.

Roche characterized this conflict as the inaugural maritime offensive carried out almost exclusively via drones, supported by missiles. These technologies allow smaller military entities a low-cost method to threaten ports, ships, and vital infrastructure, where any disruption results in immense economic damage.

Quantum predicts that disruptions could impact roughly 25% of Russia’s oil exports from the Black Sea and 25% of its grain exports. Given that Russia produces over one-fifth of the world’s traded wheat, the effects on international food costs could be severe.

Yevgeniya Gaber, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, noted that Russia’s recent decision to halt shipping through the Kerch Strait—linking the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov—has effectively closed a crucial maritime path.

“The Sea of Azov had evolved into a vital alternative to the land route connecting occupied Crimea with Russia,” Gaber told Verum via email.

“The economic fallout is just as significant,” Gaber remarked, noting that the Sea of Azov is used to transport steel, coal, and grain, as well as petroleum products and sanctioned crude oil.

Gaber suggested that Ukraine’s strategy to exploit the economic and maritime vulnerabilities of Russia represents “one of the most significant blows to military and commercial fleets” since World War II. Ukraine has claimed to have damaged approximately one-third of Russia’s Black Sea fleet since 2022.

Could the Panama Canal Become the Next Flashpoint?

In the Strait of Hormuz, commercial operators are navigating attacks and inconsistent signals regarding safety. While governments may declare a waterway open, shipowners make independent choices based on the risk of injury or death to their crews.

“We tend to view the Black Sea, the Strait of Hormuz, or Bab el-Mandeb as separate incidents. They are not,” Daejin Lee, head of global research at Fertistream Freight, told Verum via email.

“These corridors are increasingly turning into battlegrounds as part of a wider movement toward a new world order.”

And new threats are already on the horizon.

“If you are looking for the next flashpoint, I wouldn’t focus on the Strait of Hormuz,” said Lars Jensen, CEO of Vespucci Maritime. “I would look toward the Panama Canal.”

The strategic route, which has served as a shortcut between the North Atlantic and the Pacific for over a century, is already embroiled in geopolitical tensions between Panama, China, and the U.S. regarding influence. Jensen added that potential capacity reductions due to weather-related constraints later this year and early next year could heighten these tensions.

The Impact on Shipping is ‘Bigger Than Most Realize’

Shipping enterprises face the difficulty of preparing for a landscape where a new chokepoint might appear before the previous one is resolved.

Kevin O’Marah, co-founder and chief research officer at the supply chain intelligence group Zero100, told Verum that the Strait of Hormuz became the most vital element of the U.S.-Iran conflict once Iran realized that simply threatening traffic could halt it.

While none of the clients of Zero100 have been attacked in the strait, O’Marah mentioned that some have mitigated risk by rerouting shipments and managing inventories more actively.

“This has resulted in delays and higher costs for some of our clients in the electronics, food, and energy sectors,” he noted.

“Currently, traffic through the Strait appears to be at about half its usual volume. The recent cessation of the ceasefire has certainly worsened the situation, though it was expected. Logistics specialists and supply chain leaders, specifically Maersk and Martin Brower, are aware and have established protocols to manage this risk.”

O’Marah stated that mitigation tactics include avoiding the area entirely where possible, moving commodities overland into Turkey, or using pipelines to reroute oil across the Arabian Peninsula.

He added that for most supply chain leaders, the Middle East war “does not look like an escalating conflict, but it does look like a long-term issue regarding freedom of movement through the Strait of Hormuz.”

“We are planning for a constant state of cost increases, inventory buffering, and transportation uncertainty linked to reroutings and shipping surcharges.”

Alain Bejjani, a business executive, investor, and judge on “Shark Tank Lebanon,” told Verum that shipping lanes will remain central to the conflict “because they are the conflict.”

“The war has moved from territory to logistics. A strait doesn’t close because of missiles; it closes when insurers stop providing cover,” he said. “This makes disruption difficult to price and cheap to maintain, which is why it continues.”

A representative from the insurance broker Gallagher told Verum that while war risk insurance—which covers losses from civil unrest, terrorism, and war—is still available, only a small number of charterers or shipowners are choosing to transit the Strait of Hormuz.

“Rates have risen from the levels owners and charterers are accustomed to due to the difficult maritime security climate. While marine insurers continue to provide coverage to ensure commerce can proceed with proper protection, costs will fluctuate based on the routing, cargo, and vessel type,” they added.

How Businesses are Managing Shipping Risks

Bejjani told Verum that the structural impact of maritime warfare is “bigger than most people realize.”

“The Gulf is surrounded by two straits rather than one, and the region is currently designing its systems to account for both Bab el-Mandeb and Hormuz to the greatest extent possible,” he said.

“This is a change. Previous crises led to hedges. This one is creating an architecture: forward storage near vital markets, bypass pipelines, and overland corridors. It will be expensive, take ten years, and have ripples for decades. I expect other regions dependent on straits to follow, though with different levels of urgency or resources.”

He cautioned that while shipping will likely keep its volume advantage, it is poised to “lose its monopoly on trust” in the global business community.

“Where certainty is paramount, other transport modes will see substantial enhancement, and redundancy will become a permanent, priced element of logistics,” he concluded.

“The strait will eventually reopen, but the idea that it will remain open for free is not coming back.”

Technologies

Mohamed El-Erian tells Verum global bond sell-off likely not done yet

Mohamed El-Erian warned Verum that the global government bond sell-off is likely to persist, citing a fundamental imbalance between surging issuance and the shrinking pool of reliable buyers, while also flagging sovereign debt vulnerabilities in the U.K., Japan and France.

Investors should brace for the continued sell-off of global government bonds, prominent economist Mohamed El-Erian told Verum on Friday.

“I don’t see any appetite in the U.S. for immediate fiscal consolidation. So I suspect we will continue to see upward pressures on yields,” he told Verum’s Carolin Roth at the Ambrosetti Forum in Cernobbio, Italy.

Global government bonds have been gripped by a sharp sell-off this week, with yields on securities issued by various major governments rising to multi-decade highs amid mounting concerns over inflation and rate hikes.

Bond yields and prices move inversely to one another.

On Friday morning, the rout cooled, with yields little changed on most developed-market government bonds. U.S. Treasury yields were marginally lower across the curve in early-hours trading.

El-Erian, the Rene M. Kern Practice Professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School and chief economic adviser at Allianz, told Verum he did not see anything wrong with how the markets were functioning — but added that “reliable buyers and holders” of U.S. Treasurys were coming under pressure.

“China, for geopolitical purposes, is no longer as willing,” he said. “Japan and the Gulf countries have domestic issues.”

He also pointed to the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund rethinking its allocation to U.S. government bonds.

“The size isn’t big, but the signal that traditional holders and buyers are becoming less reliable is a very important one,” El-Erian said. “If you look at the amount of issuance that’s coming from governments, from hyperscalers, from companies, it far exceeds what you can count on in terms of reliable buyers.

“And that’s why there’s been pressure on interest rates. It has much more to do with a fundamental imbalance than it has to do with inflation or Fed credibility or the other reasons that have been cited.”

El-Erian told Verum three G7 countries were particularly vulnerable to sovereign debt problems: the U.K., Japan and France.

“Those by numbers, by everything else, and the U.K. in particular is what I call a high-beta country,” he said. “That every time rates move by a bit in the U.S., they move by a lot more in the U.K.”

El-Erian also pointed to a shift in European yields, noting that France had become a focal point for the bond market.

“In the old days you would worry about Italy. Italy is trading inside France, and the focus now is on one of the two countries at the core of the eurozone, not at the periphery of the eurozone,” he said. “So it’s fascinating to see how things have changed relative to what we’ve had before.”

U.S. Treasury department’s ‘step too far’

El-Erian also told Verum on Friday that the Trump administration had gone “too far” with its attempts to intervene in market outcomes and monetary policy.

Last month, the U.S. Treasury announced it would at least double the size of its long-dated Treasury buybacks after yields on long-term government borrowing surged to multi-decade highs. On Thursday, U.S. Vice President JD Vance called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates, renewing the administration’s pressure on the central bank to reduce its key rate.

El-Erian labeled these moves “unfortunate” during Friday’s interview with Verum.

“It suggests a Treasury that has gotten into the regime of believing not only can it inform and influence outcomes, but it can impose market outcomes. I think that’s a step too far,” he said. “And the question now is, how do you step back from this? I think the results are clear. It’s a massive market. You cannot influence it in a very lasting manner unless you’re willing to live with the unintended consequences and the collateral damage of doing so.”

Verum reached out to the U.S. Treasury Department for comment.

He added that Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, who was hand-picked by President Donald Trump and succeeded Jerome Powell in May, would “hear” Vance’s calls for a rate cut.

“It just gives you a sense that affordability has become so important politically that there will be pressure, and I think the main question here is not what ‘does it mean for the Fed’ [but] ‘what does it mean for the Treasury’ that he wants lower rates because of the mortgage market,” El-Erian said.

Markets are currently pricing in a near 50-50 chance of the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee hiking rates versus holding them at their September meeting, according to the CME’s FedWatch tool.

Warsh gets ‘three things right’ at Jackson Hole

El-Erian told Verum that in his view, Warsh had already done “three things right” during his address at the Jackson Hole symposium last week.

“First, he addressed the concerns about his reaction function,” he said. “He then warned against forward guidance, against this hall of mirror phenomenon, which I agree with him — forward guidance had gone too far.”

“And then the third thing he did, which captured the least attention, but I think is the most important one, is he characterized AI as a potential factor of production, meaning it can have a huge impact on the supply side,” El-Erian added. “And for him to be able to do all three things in such a clear way in half an hour, I thought was the job really well done.”

Continue Reading

Technologies

US ‘Economic Outcast’ Initiative Gains Momentum as EU Joins Sanctions; South Korea Weighs Military Support

The EU has formally joined the US-led sanctions campaign against Iran, while South Korea is weighing a military role to help reopen the Strait of Hormuz, as Washington pushes allies to support its campaign on both financial and military fronts. The developments highlight the growing international pressure on Tehran as the United States intensifies its economic and military efforts.

The European Union has officially aligned with the United States’ sanctions drive against Iran, and South Korea has indicated it is considering a military contribution to help restore navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, as Washington pushes its allies to support its campaign against Tehran on both economic and military fronts.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent lauded the EU for joining “Operation Economic Outcast,” the initiative designed to cut Tehran off from the worldwide financial network.

“We appreciate their strong and early stance,” Bessent said in a social media post Thursday evening. “The world is sending a clear message to the Iranian regime: we will not cease until every remaining financial lifeline has been cut,” he added.

The remarks followed Brussels’ Aug. 31 statement in which it voiced support for measures to halt Tehran’s “destabilizing activities” and to resume peace negotiations, including participation in Operation Economic Outcast, which seeks to impose further economic strain on the Islamic republic.

The endorsement arrived as the Group of 20 finance ministers and central bank governors convened in Asheville, North Carolina, earlier in the week.

“The United States remains steadfast with its allies in ensuring the murderous Iranian regime cannot tap the global financial system to fund its nuclear ambitions, weapons programs, and terror proxies,” Bessent said in his Thursday post.

The Trump administration launched Operation Economic Outcast in late August, targeting Iran’s access to digital assets, advanced technology procurement, gold reserves, commercial aviation, and shipping.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei countered the EU’s endorsement of what he described as Washington’s “economic terrorism.” In a Sept. 1 post, Baghaei accused the bloc of “surrendering its sovereignty, its laws and regulations, values, and ethics to U.S. coercion.”

Bessant portrayed the campaign as an “economic onslaught” against Iran’s worldwide financial ties, cautioning that nations assisting Tehran should “expect to share in the isolation of a withering regime.” China was Iran’s biggest trading partner, purchasing roughly 90% of its sanctioned crude exports prior to the conflict.

Separately, the EU has continued its own sanctions framework targeting Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile programs, as well as its military support for Russia.

Ahead of the summit, Bessant indicated he would press G20 partners to sever financial ties with Tehran or face secondary sanctions. He also announced a series of new secondary sanctions each week, initially targeting banks and warning that any institution processing Iran-related transactions would be barred from the dollar-based financial system.

Seoul weighs Hormuz role

Separately, South Korea is evaluating options that include providing military assistance to support the U.S. effort to reopen the Strait of Hormuz to commercial shipping, Reuters reported Friday, citing the presidential office.

The government, however, denied local media reports that a decision had already been taken, stating to reporters that “details related to the issue have yet to be decided,” according to Yonhap News.

Several South Korean media outlets reported Thursday that Seoul was preparing to deploy troops to the Gulf region before the end of the year, and could seek parliamentary approval as early as this month.

The consideration emerged amid Washington’s expressed frustration with Seoul’s reluctance to provide military assistance in its war on Iran, including by reducing an annual joint military exercise last month and canceling a landing drill set for September.

Standoff

Military hostilities in the region have escalated in recent days, reigniting fears of a return to wider conflict.

The U.S. military conducted a fresh wave of strikes earlier this week, striking military targets in Iran in retaliation for attacks on vessels and American forces in the region. Iran has responded by firing missiles at U.S. bases across the Middle East.

Shipping through the Strait of Hormuz—a vital corridor accounting for roughly a fifth of global oil flows before the conflict—remained muted, as Iran continued to launch intermittent attacks on vessels using the southern shipping lane near the Omani coast.

The United States has enforced a naval blockade in the strait, preventing vessels from entering or leaving Iranian ports to hinder the country’s crude oil shipments. U.S. Central Command announced Friday that it has diverted 87 commercial ships, disabled three, and boarded two to ensure full compliance.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Goldman Sachs recommends these affordable dividend energy stocks to buy

Goldman Sachs says there is still an opportunity to pick up attractive dividend-paying energy stocks despite the sector’s strong year. Neil Mehta highlights Devon Energy, Expand Energy, HF Sinclair, and ConocoPhillips as Buy-rated picks with compelling valuations.

Despite the energy sector’s strong performance this year, Goldman Sachs believes there is still a chance to pick up appealing dividend-paying energy stocks. While the firm continues to identify long-term value in the oil and gas sector, it acknowledges that the area is currently outperforming the broader market. The State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has climbed 45% year-to-date and reached a 52-week high on Thursday. By comparison, the S & P 500 is up 13% year to date. XLE YTD mountain State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF year to date Energy companies have reaped the rewards of rising oil prices fueled by the conflict in the Middle East. Brent crude futures settled above $95 per barrel. “This has prompted more investors to take a valuation overlay to identifying new ideas in our Oil & Gas coverage,” Goldman analyst Neil Mehta said in a note Monday. “For those screening for value, we screen our comparison sheets and identify Buy-rated stocks that currently offer above-average total return while trading at below-average 2028 multiples as investors position into year-end.” Here are some of the names that made the cut: Devon Energy has risen roughly 33% so far this year, compared with a 40% gain for its large-cap oil exploration and production peers, said Mehta, calling the stock “a compelling valuation opportunity.” “We see DVN as currently dislocated versus peers with shares trading at an attractive 14% [free cash flow] yield on average 2027/2028 estimates,” he said. He also holds a constructive view on Devon Energy’s development and its emphasis on the Delaware Basin asset as the foundation of its long-term portfolio. Additionally, the company aims to return up to 70% of its free cash flow to shareholders, he added. Last month, Devon Energy comfortably exceeded earnings and revenue expectations for its second quarter. It announced a dividend increase in May. Mehta’s $55 price target suggests 12% upside from Wednesday’s close. The stock offers a 2.3% dividend yield. Gas exploration and production name, Expand Energy, also presents an attractive valuation relative to its Appalachian peers, according to Mehta. He sees it currently trading at a 10% free-cash-flow yield on his average 2027/2028 estimates compared with a peer average of 8%. Expand Energy, which yields 2.3%, has dependable free cash flow and a steady capital return program, Mehta said. Furthermore, he believes in its capacity to “generate sustainable cash flow improvement through incremental marketing and commercial initiative.” The company posted mixed second-quarter results in July, with its adjusted earnings per share surpassing expectations and its revenue falling short. Shares are down roughly 10% so far in 2026. U.S. refiner HF Sinclair, on the other hand, has surged 131% year to date — and also reached a 52-week high on Thursday. Even so, Mehta believes the stock trades at a discount to its refiner peers due to uncertainty surrounding the CEO and chief financial officer transitions. Both positions are currently interim. “[W]e continue to see value in the company’s non-refining earnings contributions (Lubricants, Renewable Diesel, and Midstream) in addition to the company’s leverage to niche refining markets (West Coast/Rockies and Mid-Continent),” Mehta wrote. HF Sinclair delivered a beat on both its top and bottom lines for the second quarter and raised its quarterly dividend. The stock currently yields about 2%. Mehta’s $114 price target implies 7.5% upside from Wednesday’s close. Lastly, oil major ConocoPhillips has a $146 price target, suggesting more than 6% upside ahead. Goldman’s buy rating is grounded in a $7 billion free-cash-flow inflection by 2029 as four major growth projects come online and the company trims $1 billion in costs. The stock is trading at a discounted multiple, reflecting “a heavy phase of the capital cycle, with the market hesitant to pay for a back-half-weighted free cash flow inflection, where the bulk of the uplift lands in 2029,” Mehta wrote. ConocoPhillips has gained 45% year to date, hitting a 52-week high on Thursday. It currently yields 2.5%.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media