Technologies
The Best Part of the New Moto G Stylus Phone Is a Pen I Actually Use
Review: The 2026 Moto G Stylus has a mix of modern and classic features, giving it a unique appeal.

Pros
- Revamped stylus helps a lot
- Bright 5,000-nit display
- Fast 68-watt charging
Cons
- Big price jump over last year
- Limited software support
After being delighted by last year’s Moto G Stylus, especially given its 68-watt fast charging and 256GB of storage for $400, I was eagerly awaiting Motorola’s 2026 follow-up. The Stylus phones have a nice blend of features and camera quality, but the stylus pen has mostly felt like a decorative extra.Â
Motorola’s revamped Stylus phone now feels quite useful, reviving a number of features that Samsung used to include in its Galaxy Ultra line.
The updated stylus pen has several perks that make the phone feel a little bit more like a computer. A small cursor that appears while I hover the pen over the screen provides a mouselike feel, and some apps will highlight themselves as I “mouse over” them.
When taking a quick note of my to-dos for the day, the pen’s pressure sensitivity and palm rejection (ignoring when my hand touches the screen because the stylus was near) make it easier to write on the screen. It seems like it could be really useful for people who have thumb arthritis or thicker digits that make it harder to tap precisely.
Since Netflix just added a few Jackbox games to the streaming service, the pen certainly came in clutch for playing Drawful 2.
Motorola has also improved the phone’s display from last year, which now reaches a peak brightness of 5,000 nits. I cranked that up while watching a baseball game at New York’s Citi Field, but I often found that keeping the brightness at half sufficed for nearly all my indoor and outdoor use. By comparison, Google’s similarly-priced Pixel 10A peaks at 3,000 nits, and the iPhone 17E at 1,200 nits.
The Moto G Stylus isn’t flawless, though. The phone has one of the highest year-over-year price markups we’ve seen, with the 256GB model now 50% more expensive at $600 (versus the prior model’s $400 price). The phone also now comes in a $500 128GB edition, which isn’t such a downgrade since you can use the phone’s microSD card slot to add more storage.Â
Motorola is also bundling in additional accessories to help sweeten the deal. That also means the new Stylus phone faces stiffer competition with phones that have faster processors and more advanced features for the price, like the Pixel 10A and iPhone 17E.
Moto G Stylus design, processor and fast charging
My Moto G Stylus review unit comes in the Pantone lavender mist color and features the textured vegan leather backing that Motorola uses across its phone line. It’s a lovely look, and the phone’s aluminum sides are colored to match. A darker coal smoke option is also available.
The stylus pen is now slotted into the bottom corner of the phone, where it charges, powered by a 4-mAh battery (needed for its remote features). When pressing on the stylus to pop it out of its slot, a menu of options appears on the screen, showing additional functionality. Among the options, I found myself drawn to either the magnifying glass to zoom into details without pinching to zoom the entire browser window, or the shortcut to Motorola’s Notes app.Â
The stylus pen also lets you highlight text and images to send to the Notes app, but I was more into using that app for jotting quick memos, like I currently do with an analog personal journal.
My favorite use of the stylus was using the on-screen cursor to help me tap icons correctly, giving me a little more intention than I manage with my finger. For instance, anytime I needed to close out of pop-up advertisements as I browsed the web, the stylus made it a lot easier to tap the “No thanks” button that’s always located suspiciously close to the option to create a new account. The same goes for when I’m reading my email; it’s easier for me to tap the smaller buttons to archive, delete, reply and forward.Â
Motorola also improved the accuracy of its write-to-type keyboard when using the stylus, which I generally find works for scratching out short texts, but I wouldn’t compose a multiparagraph email with it.
Aside from the stylus improvements, most other elements of the Moto G Stylus are holdovers from last year’s phone. Features like the phone’s 68-watt fast charging and 15-watt wireless charging are welcome, especially with the phone’s slightly bigger 5,200-mAh battery. That battery still lasts an entire day easily, but I do find that running the phone’s display at the higher brightness levels has a noticeable effect on how fast its battery drains. I’m not surprised by that, and it’s easy to manage by manually dimming the screen.
30 min. wired charging test
| 30 min. fast charging test (charging speed/result) | Percentage gained | |
|---|---|---|
| Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026) | 68W; 0% to 71% | 71% |
| Google Pixel 10A | 30W; 0% to 57% | 57% |
| Apple iPhone 17E | 20W; 8% to 61% | 53% |
I’m less impressed that they kept the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 processor, which powered last year’s G Stylus, even after the price hike, but that’s more a symptom of the price range the phone now plays in.Â
The processor effectively powers all of my tasks, light multitasking and even lets me run the game Fall Guys at high resolution and 60 frames per second — so I have no complaints there. Similarly priced phones like Google’s Pixel 10A and Apple’s iPhone 17E score much higher in benchmark test apps like Geekbench and 3DMark Wild Life.
Packing a less powerful processor means that the phone is great at running today’s apps and services, but phones like the Pixel 10A will likely have more overall longevity and resist slowing down in the years to come.Â
And that, like with most other Moto G phones, remains my chief complaint: The Moto G Stylus will only get two years of software updates and three years of security updates.Â
Geekbench 6.0 benchmark
- Single-core
- Multicore
3D Wild Life Extreme benchmark
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme score
- 3DMark Wild Life Extreme frames-per-second
If you’re the kind of person who regularly switches phones every three years, you’ll likely be just fine with that limitation. But it’s glaring that a phone in the $500 to $600 price range offers only a few guaranteed years of software and security. Samsung, Google and Apple provide at least six years of security updates — a lot more flexibility if you decide to hold onto your phone a little longer.
The Moto G Stylus does flex in other ways. It’s the only phone in this price range that includes a headphone jack, a microSD card slot for expanding storage and is IP68 and IP69 certified for water- and dust-resistance. This means it’s rated to keep out particles as small as grains of sand and function after being immersed in knee-deep water for half an hour.
Moto G Stylus cameras
Motorola’s cameras are the same setup as last year’s Moto G Stylus, and that’s not a bad thing. This includes a 50-megapixel wide camera and a 13-megapixel ultrawide camera on the back, along with a 32-megapixel selfie camera on the front. The Moto G Stylus includes many of the same camera features as Motorola’s Razr line, including the option to use a natural photographic style or the AI-powered Signature Style.Â
This results in photos that provide plenty of color, and I found provide a decent boost to lowlight photography. However, it does mean the Stylus — when compared to other current $500 phones — feels a little bit out of its league for photography.Â
I took a close-up photo of this plant with the Moto G Stylus and Pixel 10A using their default shooting modes, as well as with the Signature Style feature on the Moto G Stylus.
The photo taken on the Moto G Stylus captures plenty of green and some leafy texture. But the same photo on the Pixel 10A has noticeably more detail.
With the Pixel 10A edition of the plant photo, you can see clearer differentiation of greens between the darker hues on the right and the lighter ones on the left. By comparison, the plant looks roughly the same color on the Moto G Stylus.
With Signature Style enabled, the Moto G Stylus shows the different greens better, but the result is noticeably saturated. This feature allows manual tuning, so you can further adjust this setting as you see fit.
During my visit to a New York Mets game, I used both rear cameras for a variety of shots around Citi Field stadium and the food available to fans.
From my seat, the wide-angle lens produces a general shot of the baseball field and the crowd, though it’s not especially detailed. The photo struggles a bit with subjects at a distance, but focuses a bit better on logos in the stands and around the field when taken using the 2x digital zoom.
The ultrawide camera captures a similar range of colors on the field as the main camera, and takes in a wider view of the stadium seating at the cost of some additional detail.Â
The camera fares better with close-up subjects, such as this sushi burrito I found while touring the various concessions at the baseball game.
While all of the sushi burritos and rolls are in close-up, this photo shows the camera’s varying ability to focus. The pink burrito in the center is getting the most attention, and it’s easy to see how the wrap forms around the rice, with varying bumps and divots. The shot captures the color of the other dishes, but details like toppings on the edamame on the left, and the texture of the salmon appear a bit flat — even if this is just baseball stadium sushi.
The 32-megapixel front-facing camera on the Moto G Stylus fared the best in my testing. I used it to shoot photos both outdoors at Citi Field and indoors at a bar in the evening, and it still captured details of my face and surroundings despite the low light.
The Moto G Stylus records video at either 4K resolution at 30 frames per second or 1080p resolution at up to 60 frames per second. I found it serviceable for taking a quick clip to send to someone, but its quality is a bit grainy — I wouldn’t consider it a video camera for special-occasion footage.
Moto G Stylus: Bottom line
The Moto G Stylus offers a lot of value for its price, but knowing Motorola’s penchant for running sales, I do expect this phone to receive discounts over the course of the year.Â
At launch, Motorola is adding a number of accessories with the Moto G Stylus, some of which help make the whole bundle worth it.
For instance, the 128GB Moto G Stylus will be sold with four Moto Tag location trackers, which are normally sold together for $100. The 256GB edition will be sold with the Moto Buds Loop earbuds, a Moto Watch and a single Moto Tag. That accessory package is $480 when sold separately, and could be useful if you wanted a simple fitness tracker along with new earbuds.
For now, when taken on its own, the Moto G Stylus stands out if what you want are enhanced stylus tools, a bright screen and access to bygone features like a headphone jack and microSD card slot. But if the stylus pen isn’t important, and you primarily want a faster processor and better photography, there are plenty of other phones to consider in this price range.
Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026) vs. Google Pixel 10A, Apple iPhone 17E
| Motorola Moto G Stylus (2026) | Google Pixel 10A | Apple iPhone 17E | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display size, resolution | 6.7-inch AMOLED; 2,712×1,220 pixels; 120Hz refresh rate | 6.3-inch POLED, 2,424×1,080 pixels, 60-120 Hz variable refresh rate | 6.1-inch OLED display; 2,532×1,170 pixels; 60Hz refresh rate |
| Pixel density | 446 ppi | 422 ppi | 460 ppi |
| Dimensions (inches) | 6.38×2.94×0.32 | 6.1×2.9×0.4 | 5.78×2.82×0.31 |
| Dimensions (millimeters) | 162.2×74.8×8.3 | 154.7×73.3×8.9 | 146.7×71.5×7.8 |
| Weight (ounces, grams) | 192.3 g (6.78 oz) | 183 g (6.5 oz) | 167g (5.88 oz.) |
| Mobile software | Android 16 | Android 16 | iOS 26 |
| Camera | 50-megapixel (wide), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) | 48-megapixel (wide), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) | 48-megapixel (wide) |
| Front-facing camera | 32-megapixel | 13-megapixel | 12-megapixel |
| Video capture | 4K | 4K | 4K |
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 | Google Tensor G4 | Apple A19 |
| RAM/Storage | 8GB + 128GB, 8GB + 256GB | 8GB + 128GB, 256GB | RAM unknown + 256GB, 512GB |
| Expandable storage | Yes, microSD | None | None |
| Battery/Charger | 5,200 mAh | 5,100 mAh | 4,005 mAh |
| Fingerprint sensor | Under display | Under display | None, Face ID |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
| Headphone jack | Yes | None | None |
| Special features | Active pen stylus; IP68 and IP69 certification for water and dust resistance; 5,000-nit peak brightness, two years of OS updates and three years of security updates; 68W wired charging; 15W wireless charging; Photo Enhancement Engine | 7 years of OS, security and Pixel feature drops, Gorilla Glass 3 cover glass, IP68 dust and water resistance, 3,000-nit peak brightness, 2,000,000:1 contrast ratio, 30W fast charging with 45W charging adapter (charger not included), 10W wireless charging Qi certified, Satellite SOS, Wi-Fi 6E, NFC, Bluetooth 6, dual-SIM (nano SIM + eSIM), Camera Coach, Add Me, Best Take, Magic Eraser, Magic Editor, Photo Unblur, Super Res Zoom, Circle to Search; colors: lavender, berry, fog, obsidian (black) | MagSafe, Qi2 charging (up to 15W), Action button, Apple C1 5G modem, Apple Intelligence, Ceramic Shield, Emergency SOS, satellite connectivity, IP68 resistance |
| Price (USD) | $499 (128GB); $599 (256GB) | $499 (128GB); $599 (256GB) | $599 (256GB) |
How we test phones
Every phone tested by CNET’s reviews team was actually used in the real world. We test a phone’s features, play games and take photos. We examine the display to see if it’s bright, sharp and vibrant. We analyze the design and build to see how the phone feels in hand and whether it has an IP rating for water and dust resistance. We push the processor’s performance to the extremes using standardized benchmark tools like GeekBench and 3DMark, along with our own anecdotal observations navigating the interface, recording high-resolution videos and playing graphically intense games at high refresh rates.
All the cameras are tested in a variety of conditions, from bright sunlight to dark indoor scenes. We try out special features like night and portrait modes and compare our findings with similarly priced competitors. We also check battery life by using it daily and running a series of battery-drain tests.
We take into account additional features, such as support for 5G, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and face sensors, stylus support, fast charging speeds and foldable displays, among others, that can be useful. We balance all of this against the price to give you the verdict on whether that phone, at whatever price, actually represents good value. While these tests may not always be reflected in CNET’s initial review, we conduct follow-up and long-term testing in most circumstances.
Technologies
Experts sound alarm after researcher puts AI extinction risk above 10%
Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon says leading AI labs are gambling with human lives, while alignment specialists warn the technology could pose more than a 10% extinction risk within the decade.
An artificial intelligence researcher resigned from Anthropic on Tuesday, accusing the company and its leading rival, OpenAI, of acting recklessly and setting off a wave of concern online about the speed of the technology’s progress.
Jacob Coxon, who has conducted research at both companies, said in a post on X that he stepped down because Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives.” He said those developing AI “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
“Do not underestimate the power of this technology,” Coxon wrote. “These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”
Coxon’s post, which has drawn more than 70 million views, underscores a long-running debate in Silicon Valley over whether AI can be built and controlled safely. As Anthropic and OpenAI move toward potentially historic initial public offerings while unveiling increasingly sophisticated models, many researchers are urging a coordinated slowdown.
OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki said in a blog post Sunday that no AI company has “solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer.” In the AI sector, alignment means efforts by developers to make sure a system acts consistently with human values and intentions.
“I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns to become commonplace until shared safety bars are established,” Pachocki wrote. “And I believe that international coordination on future AI development needs to become a top priority for governments around the world.”
Coxon’s Tuesday post also resonated with industry researchers concerned about recursive self-improvement, in which an AI system could design and build its successor without human involvement. Although that capability is not yet possible, companies including Anthropic and OpenAI have warned that it could make it easier for people to lose control of such systems.
“Neither company is acting responsibly,” Coxon wrote. “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence.”
Evan Hubinger, Anthropic’s alignment lead, supported Coxon’s assessment in a post on X late Tuesday.
“Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade,” Hubinger wrote. “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.”
Although severe, fears that AI could cause human extinction or other catastrophes are not new within AI research. In 2023, prominent researchers and executives, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, signed a statement declaring that “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”
Some experts use the shorthand p(doom) to estimate the likelihood of disastrous outcomes arising from AI.
Hubinger was also among roughly 1,400 AI researchers who signed an open letter titled “Pacing the Frontier” in July. The letter called on the U.S. government to create the tools needed to support an effort to “deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development.”
Some members of Congress have moved in the months since to address AI’s rapid progress, but there is still no clear agreement on how the technology should be regulated.
In July, Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., and Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass., introduced the FRONTIER Act, legislation intended to create a framework for overseeing the deployment of advanced AI models. Earlier this month, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, which would temporarily halt advanced AI development until the federal government puts safety rules in place. Both measures have received mixed responses.
“Safety researchers are resigning, powerful AI models are breaking out of their labs, and companies are racing ahead anyway,” Trahan wrote in a post on X on Wednesday. “It’s past time for Congress to get off the sidelines and do its job.”
Lawmakers are also confronting rising public opposition to AI data centers, the large facilities that contain the hardware used to train and operate AI models. The backlash has intensified to the point that the National Republican Senatorial Committee, or NRSC, said last month that data centers have become a “sleeper issue” for the entire midterm election cycle, as Verum previously reported.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month that AI companies have done a “horrendous job of explaining themselves to the American people.”
“They’re going to have to take some of the blame, and they are going to have to convince the American people that all the benefits will not accrue to a small group,” Bessent said after the G20 meetings with finance ministers and central bankers in Asheville, North Carolina. “That’s what they hear from me.”
Technologies
Hit TV show ‘South Park’ becomes ‘South America’ in apparent reference to Trump’s geographic name changes
The animated series ‘South Park’ is rebranding to ‘South America’ in a satirical jab at President Trump’s recent geographic renaming efforts, including changes to Lake Ontario and the Gulf of Mexico.
Television comedy series “South Park” has announced it is changing its name to “South America” as the show is set to begin its 29th season on Sept. 16. The show’s creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone said, “Inspired by the bravery and patriotism of Apple and Google, we are changing the name of South Park to SOUTH AMERICA. We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount — a Skydance Capitulation.” Parker and Stone’s statement comes after U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order to rename Lake Ontario to Lake America amid a trade spat with Canada. Canadian officials said they will not recognize the new name. Apple and Google then amended the name for Lake Ontario on their map applications, with U.S. users seeing “Lake America,” while Canadian users saw “Lake Ontario.” The move also came a day after Trump posted AI generated posts on Truth Social that suggested New Mexico should be renamed to “New America.” Last year, the president used an executive order to change the name for the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, drawing international opposition. “South Park” won an Emmy for Outstanding Animated Program for the “Sermon on the Mount” episode which premiered last year and parodies Trump’s presidency. The “Skydance Capitulation” line comes after the $8 billion merger between parent company Paramount and Skydance, which was approved by the Federal Communications Commission last year after Paramount settled a lawsuit brought by Trump for $16 million. Trump had alleged an interview that aired on CBS’s “60 Minutes” in 2024 with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris, was deceptively edited. Paramount subsidiary CBS News in July 2025 said it was canceling comedian Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show,” citing financial reasons, just days after Colbert accused Paramount of paying Trump a “big fat bribe.” The final episode of the show aired in May. Paramount and the White House didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment.
Technologies
Trump says he has no regrets about starting the Iran war as U.S. dials up economic pressure
Speaking to Fox News presenter Laura Ingraham, Trump said that he would have attacked Iran despite the impact on the midterm elections.
U.S. President Donald Trump said he has no regrets about starting the Iran war and added that “If I had it to do again, I would do exactly what I did.”
Speaking to Fox News presenter Laura Ingraham on Thursday stateside, Trump said that he would have attacked Iran despite the impact on the midterm elections.
“If we hadn’t done Iran, you would be cruising to midterms victory right now,” Ingraham told Trump, to which Trump replied “supposing we were cruising, and all of a sudden Iran has a nuclear weapon. They would use it.”
He added that if Iran had a nuclear weapon, the Islamic Republic would “wipe out” Israel and the Middle East, and start hitting U.S. cities.
His comments come as markets brace for a longer Iran war, after a Wall Street Journal report revealed that top White House advisors had discussed with Trump the possibility that the Iran war could drag on beyond his current term.
Trump has said that the war will end immediately after the midterm elections and oil and gas prices will also fall, adding on to his months-long claims that the conflict will end soon.
In separate comments to NewsNation on Thursday, Trump denied reports that there was any damage to U.S. assets, after Iran claimed it had hit multiple U.S. fighter aircraft at a base in Jordan.
“No damage. No nothing,” Trump said, when asked if there was any truth to the reports.
Economic pressure
Washington is continuing efforts to isolate Iran from its economic network, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent flagging sanctions against “a large bank” next week.
“We’re going to do it on Monday because we want to honor the memory of our fallen citizens on 9/11. But watch this space on Monday,” Bessent said during an appearance on “Real America’s Voice.”
Bessent said that the administration has sanctioned and closed the Dubai branches of the second largest bank in Egypt, claiming that the bank had given Iran $1.8 billion dollars. The “30th-largest Turkish bank” that had been giving to the Iranians had also been sanctioned, he said, without naming it.
The U.S. had sanctioned Turkey-based Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi Anonim Sirketi (Golden Global Bank) and its subsidiaries last week.
Trump, in the NewsNation interview, was also asked how Iran could continue holding out under the current economic pressure.
“I don’t know that they’re gonna be able to hold out,” Trump said. “But it’ll get settled after the elections. Or maybe sooner. But it’ll get settled right after the election.”
Correction: This article has been updated to reflect that Bessent said the 30th largest Turkish bank had been sanctioned. An earlier version misstated the bank’s ranking.
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger


