Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Review: A Pocket-Sized Powerhouse, but It’s Not for Everyone

At $2,900, Samsung’s latest foldable is a true phone-tablet hybrid and a multitasker’s dream. But more isn’t always better.

Our Experts

Headshot of Abrar Al-Heeti
Abrar Al-Heeti Senior Technology Reporter
Abrar’s interests include phones, streaming, autonomous vehicles, internet trends, entertainment, pop culture and digital accessibility. In addition to her current role, she’s worked for CNET’s video, culture and news teams. She graduated with bachelor’s and master’s degrees in journalism from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Though Illinois is home, she now loves San Francisco — steep inclines and all.
Expertise Abrar has spent her career at CNET analyzing tech trends while also writing news, reviews and commentaries across mobile, streaming and online culture. Credentials

  • Named a Tech Media Trailblazer by the Consumer Technology Association in 2019, a winner of SPJ NorCal’s Excellence in Journalism Awards in 2022 and has three times been a finalist in the LA Press Club’s National Arts & Entertainment Journalism Awards.
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

The writer holds an unfolded Galaxy TriFold. Since the phone is not fully flat, creases are visible.

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Pros

  • Generous 6.5-inch cover screen
  • Long-lasting battery
  • Multitasking is seamless
  • Excellent camera

Cons

  • Prohibitive $2,900 price
  • Typing on main display is difficult
  • Not all apps work well with 10-inch display
  • Phone feels clunky when closed

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a spectacle. With a display split into three sections that fold and unfold like a pamphlet, it’s a phone that essentially doubles as a tablet when open. The TriFold is the result of Samsung’s yearslong effort to make its foldable phones sleeker and more compact — and, ultimately, more practical. 

As one friend aptly put it when I first showed her the TriFold: «So you’re just walking around with an iPad in your pocket?» More like a Galaxy Tab, but yes, that’s the idea.

With such a unique design and a prohibitive $2,900 price tag ($3,164 after taxes and fees), who is the TriFold really for? I spent two weeks using Samsung’s two-in-one device to see how it performed and to better understand its target audience. If one thing is clear from this phone’s limited availability and sky-high cost, it’s not exactly a mass-market product.

Samsung spent a good deal of 2025 touting its mobile design innovations, from the super slim Galaxy S25 Edge to the ultrasleek Galaxy Z Fold 7. It capped off the year with the debut of the Galaxy Z TriFold, which launched in December in some parts of the world and arrived in the US in late January. For years, foldable phones have been clunky and rather impractical, with narrow cover displays and subpar cameras. They’ve come a long way, and consumers no longer have to sacrifice practicality for novelty. (They still have to sacrifice a good amount of money, though.)

The TriFold feels like the culmination of Samsung’s technological advancements. Still, it’s a very niche device and is a reminder that more isn’t always better, at least not for everyone.

How the Galaxy Z TriFold feels in my hand

It’s safe to say I’ve never used a phone that feels like the Galaxy Z TriFold, open or closed. Though the phone borrows many attributes from its Galaxy Z Fold 7 sibling, it’s in a league of its own — aside from Huawei’s Mate XT Ultimate, a trifold sold outside the US. 

The TriFold opens up to a 10-inch display that’s sectioned into three thin panels, each measuring 3.9mm, 4mm and 4.2mm at the thickest point (not accounting for the camera bump).

When the phone is open, it feels sleek and relatively lightweight for what it’s packing, clocking in at 309 grams. I can hold it with one hand or two, though two feels more comfortable. 

However, when the phone is unfolded, I tend to accidentally tap the home or back button with my palm or fingers as I hold it up, since the bezels are so thin. The jury is still out on whether I’m just a klutz, but I think part of it is just getting used to fresh hardware design — and Samsung potentially tweaking the placement of certain controls in future iterations. 

When the TriFold is shut, its sleekness all but disappears. With three panels stacked together, the phone feels rather dense and measures a slightly clunky 12.9mm thick. It’s not prohibitively bulky, but the noticeable heft definitely sets it apart from bar-style phones; for instance, the Galaxy S25 is only 7.2mm thick. It also distinguishes it from the Z Fold 7, which measures just 8.9mm thick when closed. But that extra panel on the TriFold has to go somewhere. 

Still, the TriFold’s 6.5-inch cover screen serves up enough real estate to comfortably do anything you’d do on a standard phone, like send texts, scroll through Instagram or check an email.

The TriFold’s camera bump is about as pronounced as you’d expect on any premium phone today. The three rear lenses sit on a raised platform, as they do on the Z Fold 7, and my index finger often brushes up against it, given the vertical layout. It’s not a big deal, but I do wish that weren’t the case.

As satisfying as it is to snap a book-style foldable shut, feeling that sensation twice with the TriFold is delightful. When I first got my hands on this phone, I was grateful for the on-screen and haptic alerts warning me to close the left-side panel first. (Being right-handed, this was a slight learning curve.) But I got the hang of it surprisingly quickly. It’s nice that the section with the power and volume buttons protrudes slightly to the right, making it easy to access those controls when the phone is fully folded. 

The Galaxy Z TriFold comes with a case that snaps onto the back panel and covers one of the hinges. It’s a neat perk to have that option, but I didn’t want anything coming between me and my slick new phone, so I didn’t use it.

The TriFold does not have S Pen support. While that may feel like a missed opportunity, I don’t think it detracts from the device’s practicality. Just tap away with your fingers (or a connected keyboard), and you’ll be good.

Each display has its purpose

The drastically different sizes of the cover and main displays means each serves an ideal purpose. Similar to my experience with book-style foldables like the Galaxy Z Fold 7, I tended to use the TriFold’s 6.5-inch cover display the majority of the time. 

For most tasks, like taking photos, scrolling through social media and messaging (the bulk of what I do on a phone), the smaller display and configuration is ideal. It’s easier to hold the TriFold in that layout, and typing is much, much easier than on the expansive main display.

At times, I even opted for watching a YouTube video in landscape mode on the cover screen — despite a much more spacious display lying just two unfolds away — because it still did the trick, and the phone was easier to handle when moving around.

Like other foldables, the TriFold’s app continuity function means whatever you’re doing on the cover screen is seamlessly carried over to the main display when you open the phone. This is ideal when watching videos: If you decide you want to move to the inside screen, the content keeps rolling and the audio doesn’t stop as you unfurl the phone.  

I used the 10-inch main display about a third of the time and primarily when watching videos or multitasking. Like with Samsung’s book-style foldable, you can run up to three apps simultaneously, but the TriFold’s roomier display lets each app feel less crammed than on the Z Fold 7.

I even tried working on the TriFold while multitasking. I was able to have Google Docs, Slack and CNET’s content management system open all at once. It was tight, but it worked.

To really tap into the phone’s spacious display, you can use Samsung DeX, which essentially turns any app on the TriFold into a window you can drag around and resize however you’d like (much as you would on a computer interface). I tested this while writing this review; in fact, this whole section is coming to you via DeX, after pairing the phone to a wireless mouse and keyboard.

It’s all pretty seamless and feels like working on a mini monitor. Old habits die hard, though, and I look forward to going back to my 16-inch laptop with a larger screen and attached keyboard.

The TriFold was my trusty entertainment companion when I caught strep throat halfway through reviewing this phone. I watched endless Pixar movies and YouTube videos when I was stuck in bed. The Z Fold 7’s 8-inch display is great for this too, but the TriFold’s notably larger screen takes the experience to the next level. It didn’t even feel like I was watching on a phone anymore; it felt like I’d switched to a tablet. 

And now, the question you’ve likely been waiting for me to answer: How obvious are the two creases on the main display?

Well, you can still see them, but they virtually disappear when you’re actually using the phone or watching something. The creases are also more subdued than on the Z Fold 7, so it’s likely Samsung is slowly working its way toward eliminating them altogether. But we’re not there yet. 

I refrain from using the main display for social media scrolling because many apps aren’t well-suited for that horizontal format. Some Instagram posts look grainy when stretched on the 10-inch display, and Reels are weirdly cropped in my feed until I click into them.

Other apps, like X and DoorDash, don’t fill the screen, but rather sit square in the middle, bordered by thick blank bars. I can tap arrows to shift the on-screen content to the left or right for easier scrolling, though. 

Galaxy Z TriFold battery life and performance

One thing that impressed me most about the Galaxy Z TriFold is how well the 5,600-mAh battery held up. The three-cell battery is split between the panels to extend how long each charge lasts. I could stream, surf the web and snap photos as much as I wanted without worrying about being stranded with a dead phone, even while keeping the Always-on display enabled. 

Across multiple days of testing, the TriFold lasted me nearly a day and a half before needing to recharge. For instance, one day I began with a full battery at 7 a.m., and the phone lasted until 2:30 p.m. the next afternoon. On another day, I went from 100% battery at 9:20 a.m. on a Saturday to 0% at 6:33 p.m. on Sunday evening. In each instance, I did a good deal of streaming, texting, ordering food delivery, scrolling through Instagram and X, and going down YouTube rabbit holes, regularly switching between the cover and main displays. 

Speaking of charging, the TriFold supports 45-watt super-fast charging. That’s good for Samsung, but merely OK when compared to the much faster charging you can get with several other phones like the OnePlus 15 (up to 100 watts) and Motorola’s 2025 Moto G Stylus (68 watts). But 45 watts gets the TriFold from 0% to 61% in half an hour, so I can’t complain. The phone reaches a full charge in about an hour and 15 minutes. 

This was rather shocking, but you’ll get both a charging cable and a charging brick in the Z TriFold box. Wild, right? With most phone makers these days opting not to include extras with their devices, I’m glad Samsung chose to at least toss in a charging brick with the TriFold, given its astronomical price.

In CNET’s 45-minute endurance test, which involves streaming, scrolling through social media, joining a video call and playing games on the internal display, the Galaxy Z TriFold’s battery went from full to 92%. That’s lower than the 96% I got with Google’s Pixel 10 Pro Fold and the 95% on the Oppo Find N5. But it’s only slightly less than the 93% I got with the Galaxy Z Fold 7, which is pretty impressive given there’s a whole other panel to power on the TriFold.

In a longer, 3-hour streaming test over Wi-Fi, I watched a YouTube video in full-screen mode at full brightness on the inner display. The TriFold’s battery dropped from 100% to 76%.

That’s not too far off the 78% I got with the Pixel 10 Pro Fold. But both are handily beaten by the 84% I got with the Z Fold 7 and the 89% on the Oppo Find N5.

The TriFold is powered by a Snapdragon 8 Elite chip, which powers the many Galaxy AI and Gemini features on board, like Generative Edit for photos, Live Translate and Circle to Search.

The phone runs Android 16 and Samsung’s One UI 8 out of the box, and it supports seven years of software and security updates — which is the least I’d expect from a phone that costs more than the average laptop.

It has the same chip that powers last year’s Galaxy S25 phones — so, not quite the latest and greatest Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 processor launched in the fall, but it’s still powerful silicon.

Benchmark tests for the CPU in Geekbench 6 place the Z TriFold above the Google Pixel 10 Pro XL, the Motorola Razr Ultra and the Galaxy S25 Edge, and it’s on par with the Galaxy Z Fold 7. 

In a graphics test using 3DMark’s Wild Life Extreme, the TriFold exceeded the performance of the S25 Edge, the iPhone 17 Pro Max and the Pixel 10 Pro XL, but it was beaten out by the Z Fold 7.

Check out the graphs below for more specifics.

Geekbench v.6.0

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 2,980 9,582Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 2,944 9,379Google Pixel 10 Pro XL 2,288 6,215Motorola Razr Ultra 2,837 8,705Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 2,875 9,013
  • Single-core
  • Multicore
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance.

3DMark Wild Life Extreme

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold 5,909Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 6,424Google Pixel 10 Pro XL 3,354Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max 5,789Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge 5,702
Note: Longer bars indicate better performance.

The Galaxy Z TriFold’s camera takes stunning photos

The Galaxy Z TriFold’s top-notch cameras are further evidence of how far foldables have come. Like the Z Fold 7, the TriFold has a 200-megapixel wide, 12-megapixel ultrawide and 10-megapixel telephoto camera on the back, as well as a 10-megapixel selfie camera on both the cover and inside displays. 

I really enjoyed snapping photos on this phone and was regularly blown away by what it captured. Here are a few of my favorite shots:

The TriFold doesn’t compromise on camera quality. The photos are comparable to what you’d capture on the flagship Galaxy S series. And at nearly $3,000, I’d sure hope so.

Galaxy Z TriFold final thoughts

After using the Galaxy Z TriFold for a couple of weeks, it became clear that this phone is for a very specific subset of people. And I’m not sure that includes me.

I’ve enjoyed the novelty and versatility of the TriFold: It can easily double as a workstation or tablet for watching movies or multitasking. Still, it offers more than I’d realistically need from a phone. 

My usual tasks include scrolling through social media, texting and taking photos — all things you don’t need a 10-inch display for. And even when I want to watch a video on a larger display, I’m happy to settle for the 8-inch screen on the Z Fold 7, especially since that phone more closely matches the thickness of a standard, nonfolding phone when it’s closed. The TriFold’s beefier build when closed is a bit of a drawback for me.

But I think plenty of people will feel like the TriFold is the perfect fit for their lifestyles. Business-oriented power users in particular might appreciate that this phone essentially serves as a mini laptop you can just fold up and toss in your pocket. Anyone who wishes they could combine their phone and tablet into one gadget will find that the TriFold does the trick. Plus, watching movies and YouTube videos really is a wonderful experience on this phone, especially if you’re always on the go.

What’s harder to stomach is the TriFold’s astronomical $3,000 price, which will keep it out of the hands of all but the savviest tech fans and those with the deepest pockets.

Still, this phone embodies what foldable phones have long strived to be: versatile, innovative and practical. And honestly, it’s just a joy to use.

Technologies

Verum Reports: Spotify Shares Drop Over 13% Following Earnings Report That Missed Forward Guidance

Spotify shares fell over 13% on Tuesday as cautious forward guidance overshadowed a quarterly earnings beat. The streaming giant reported revenue of 4.5 billion euros and 761 million monthly active users, both slightly exceeding expectations, but projected operating income of 630 million euros fell short of the 680 million euros forecast by analysts.

Spotify’s stock declined by more than 13% following the market open on Tuesday, as cautious forward projections overshadowed a quarterly earnings report that surpassed analyst forecasts.

The streaming giant reported first-quarter revenue of 4.5 billion euros ($5.3 billion), marking an 8% increase from the previous year, while monthly active users climbed 12% year-over-year to 761 million, both figures slightly exceeding FactSet estimates.

Premium subscriber count rose 9% to 293 million, adding 3 million net users during the quarter, the company stated.

Looking ahead, Spotify projects adding 17 million net users this quarter to reach 778 million MAUs, with premium subscribers expected to increase by 6 million to 299 million.

Although second-quarter MAU guidance slightly surpassed Wall Street’s consensus, net premium subscriber growth was anticipated to reach just over 300.4 million, according to FactSet analyst polls.

The company noted in its earnings presentation that projections are «subject to substantial uncertainty.»

Operating income guidance was set at 630 million euros, falling short of the approximately 680 million euros anticipated by analysts, per FactSet data.

Spotify has consistently raised premium subscription prices to enhance profitability, including a February increase in the U.S. from $11.99 to $12.99 monthly.

At Monday’s close, the stock had dropped 14% year-to-date.

Continue Reading

Technologies

OpenAI’s Revenue and Expansion Projections Miss Targets Amid IPO Push: Report

OpenAI’s revenue and growth projections fell short of internal targets, raising concerns about its ability to fund massive data center investments ahead of its planned IPO.

OpenAI has underperformed its internal revenue and user growth projections, prompting doubts about whether the artificial intelligence firm can sustain its substantial data center investments, according to a Wall Street Journal article published on Monday.

Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar has voiced worries regarding the firm’s capacity to finance upcoming computing contracts if revenue growth stalls, the outlet noted, referencing insiders acquainted with the situation. Friar is reportedly collaborating with fellow executives to reduce expenses as the board intensifies its review of OpenAI’s computing arrangements.

‘This is ridiculous,’ OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Friar stated in a joint message to Verum. ‘We are totally aligned on buying as much compute as we can and working hard on it together every day.’

Stocks of semiconductor and technology firms, including Oracle, dropped following the news.

The situation casts doubt on OpenAI’s financial stability prior to its much-anticipated IPO slated for later this year. Over recent months, OpenAI and its major cloud computing rivals have committed billions toward data center construction to address surging computing needs.

Several of these agreements are directly linked to OpenAI. Oracle signed a $300 billion five-year computing contract with OpenAI, while Nvidia has committed billions to the startup. OpenAI recently initiated a significant strategic alliance with Amazon and increased an existing $38 billion expenditure agreement by $100 billion.

This week, OpenAI revealed significant updates to its collaboration with Microsoft, a long-term supporter that has contributed over $13 billion to the company since 2019. Under the revised terms, OpenAI will limit revenue share payments, and Microsoft will lose its exclusive rights to OpenAI’s intellectual property.

Read the full report from The Wall Street Journal.

Continue Reading

Technologies

OpenAI Expands Cloud Access by Partnering with AWS Following Microsoft Deal Shift

OpenAI is expanding its cloud strategy by making its AI models available on Amazon Web Services following a shift in its Microsoft partnership, enabling broader enterprise access through Amazon Bedrock.

Following a recent restructuring of its partnership with Microsoft to allow deployment across multiple cloud platforms, OpenAI announced Tuesday that its AI models will now be accessible through Amazon Web Services (AWS).

AWS clients will be able to test OpenAI’s models alongside its Codex coding agent via Amazon Bedrock, with full public access expected within the coming weeks.

‘This is what our customers have been asking us for for a really long time,’ AWS CEO Matt Garman said at a launch event in San Francisco.

Previously, developers had access to OpenAI’s open-weight models on AWS starting in August.

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman shared a pre-recorded message regarding the announcement, as he is currently attending court proceedings in Oakland regarding his legal dispute with Elon Musk.

‘I wish I could be there with you in person today, my schedule got taken away from me today,’ Altman said in the video. ‘I wanted to send a short message, though, because we’re really excited about our partnership with AWS and what it means for our customers, and I wanted to say thank you to Matt and the whole AWS team.’

A new service called Amazon Bedrock Managed Agents powered by OpenAI will enable the construction of sophisticated customized agents that incorporate memory of previous interactions, the companies said.

Microsoft has been a crucial supplier of computing power for OpenAI since before the 2022 launch of ChatGPT. Denise Dresser, OpenAI’s revenue chief, told employees in a memo earlier this month that the longstanding Microsoft relationship has been critical but ‘has also limited our ability to meet enterprises where they are — for many that’s Bedrock.’

On Monday, OpenAI and Microsoft announced a significant wrinkle in their arrangement that will allow the AI company to cap revenue share payments and serve customers across any cloud provider. Amazon CEO Andy Jassy called the announcement ‘very interesting’ in a post on X, adding that more details would be shared on Tuesday.

OpenAI and Amazon have been getting closer in other ways.

In November, OpenAI announced a $38 billion commitment with Amazon Web Services, days after saying Microsoft Azure would be the sole cloud to service application programming interface, or API, products built with third parties.

Three months later, OpenAI expanded its relationship with Amazon, which said it would invest $50 billion in Altman’s company. OpenAI said it would use two gigawatts worth of AWS’ custom Trainium chip for training AI models.

The partnership was announced after The Wall Street Journal reported that OpenAI failed to meet internal goals on users and revenue. Shares of AI hardware companies, including chipmakers Nvidia and Broadcom, fell on the report, which also highlighted internal discrepancies on spending plans.

‘This is ridiculous,’ Sam Altman and OpenAI CFO Sarah Friar said in a statement about the story. ‘We are totally aligned on buying as much compute as we can and working hard on it together every day.’

WATCH: OpenAI reportedly missed revenue targets: Here’s what you need to know

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media