Connect with us

Technologies

Darren Aronofsky, Your AI Slop Is Ruining American History in ‘On This Day…1776’

Commentary: The high-profile Hollywood director created a studio dedicated to creating a “new cinematic grammar” built around AI. This is not a good start.

Just over 2 minutes into an early episode of the new short film series, On This Day…1776, we see a hand sweep tenderly over the title page of Thomas Paine’s just-published firebrand pamphlet Common Sense; Addressed to the Inhabitants of America.

Only, in that moment, “America” vanishes, replaced by the all-caps nonsense text “Aamereedd.”

It’s a classic tell that we’re in the presence of generative AI.

But this isn’t the gotcha moment you might think it is. The filmmakers behind the series, led by executive producer Darren Aronofsky, are fully embracing generative video. That’s as big a driving force behind “On This Day…1776” as the intention to tell stories of the American Revolution in this 250th anniversary year.

Aronofsky is known for directing high-profile films including Black Swan, The Whale and Mother, but he’s also the founder of Primordial Soup, the AI-first studio that created On This Day…1776. Its larger ambition, according to its website, is to fuse art and technology into a new creative model, “merging bold narrative, emotional depth, and experimental work flows.” That is, the studio wants to use AI to create bona fide art.

Good luck with that. 

Because Darren? Y’all are making a mess of it with this project.

I’ve been watching the episodes as they drop on YouTube, and I am dumbfounded. Bold narrative? More like performative staging, tipping over into self-parody. Emotional depth? About as much as you’d find on the cover of the average history textbook.

It’s hellish broth of machine-driven AI slop and bad human choices.

At least they’re on point with the whole “experimental work flows” thing. Creative people in Hollywood and beyond are staring down the barrel of artificial intelligence systems that threaten to take away their livelihoods and devalue the skills they’ve worked lifetimes to perfect. Aronofsky and Primordial Soup say they’re trying to find a way forward in blending human talent and agency with AI tools that have inevitability written all over them.

We’re living through an anxiety-ridden moment induced by powerful image and video tools like Google’s Veo and Nano Banana and OpenAI’s Sora, along with the introduction of an AI ingenue named Tilly Norwood. Two years after strikes in Hollywood over the use of AI in movies and TV shows, Walt Disney Studios in late December reached a deal with OpenAI allowing AI to slurp up characters from Marvel, Pixar and Star Wars.

In an interview with The Guardian last summer, not long after Primordial Soup launched, Aronofsky acknowledged that AI tools are being widely used to create slop, citing that as motivation. “There are a lot of artists who are fighting against AI, but I don’t see that as making any sense,” he said. “If we don’t shape these tools, somebody else will.”

But the way to fight AI slop — slick but soulless images and video, superficially articulate text that lacks any true understanding of the real world, and all of it flooding the internet — is not with more AI slop.

Which, I’m sorry, is what we’ve got with On This Day…1776.

What AI hath wrought in ‘On This Day…1776’

The episodes in On This Day…1776 are meant to recreate signature moments from that foundational year, debuting weekly on the date of the moment being depicted. They’re under 5 minutes in length, so on that basis alone, don’t expect Ken Burns’ The American Revolution.

So far, those moments include George Washington’s defiant raising of an American flag and the publication of Paine’s Common Sense. On the plus side, there’s crispness to the pacing (an artifact, perhaps, of time limits on AI’s video generation), richness of detail and a sense that the filmmakers are trying to give us a “you are there” feel.

But the overall effect lands somewhere between unsettling and laughable. The flag episode has the heavy-handed feel of a recruitment ad for the Continental Army, not any kind of meaningful narrative. A drawing room encounter between Paine and Ben Franklin would be right at home with the fabricated interactions in a corporate HR training video.

Across the episodes, there are odd directorial and editing choices. Tight shots of buckled shoes and the backs of people’s heads. The passing of a scroll from hand to hand in quick-cut scenes. Ludicrously overdramatic titling sequences introducing famous figures. An 8-second sequence in the flag episode that subjects us to closeups of one mouth after another shouting. Presumably, these filmmaking decisions were made by humans.

Then there’s the AI. Faces are waxy or rubbery, and often have a weird mix of blurring and hyperintense texture. At one point we see a hand that’s overly moist; it’s supposed to indicate fevered sweating but looks instead like an alien creation emerging from a pod. Lips are rarely synced to the words they’re speaking. Faces, especially Franklin’s, shift subtly but disturbingly. 

The AI has an especially hard time with the members of Parliament gathered to hear George III speak about the rebellious colonies. There’s a sameness across the several dozen middle-aged men in wigs crammed into the benches, not least in the smaller group shots of gents who are clearly clones of each other.

More than almost anything else, what undermines the series is its show-offy nature. We’re repeatedly subjected to intense closeups: strands of hair, the weave of a burlap bag, the woody texture of a matchstick or a ship’s mast, painfully sharp wrinkles on old men’s faces. OK, OK, we get it — AI images are getting much better at photorealism.

What we don’t get enough of from Primordial Soup is how exactly it’s using AI. The press release announcing the launch of On This Day…1776, which it describes as an “animated series,” refers vaguely to “a combination of traditional filmmaking tools and emerging AI capabilities” and to the series being “animated by artists using a variety of generative AI tools.” It also notes that the series was made “in part” with AI from Google’s DeepMind division, and that DeepMind brought us Gemini and Nano Banana as well.

The Primordial Soup website doesn’t say anything specifically about On This Day…1776, and in fact doesn’t say a lot at all. But it does have an “opportunity” page noting that it’s looking for AI artists who want to “contribute to a new cinematic grammar being built in real time” working with AI tools like Veo, Runway, Midjourney and Sora with 3D/VFX software including Blender, Unreal and Houdini.

Veo was instrumental in the making of Ancestra, the first of a planned three short films from the partnership of DeepMind and Primordial Soup that’s meant to explore new applications for Veo. Ancestra, which debuted at the Tribeca Film Festival last June, combines generative video and live-action filmmaking.

So it’s a safe bet that Veo is responsible for a lot of what we see in On This Day…1776.

Meanwhile, what of the humans involved in making the series? Again, there’s very little to go on. The episodes don’t scroll any credits for the artists, nor are they listed anywhere else that I’ve looked. The press materials say the series is “voiced by SAG actors,” but again, no individual credits. There is a reference to the score being by someone named Jordan Dykstra and to a writers’ room led by a Lucas Sussman. So that’s two humans, at least.

Representatives for Primordial Soup and Time Studios, the distributor for the series, did not respond to request for more detail.

AI’s place in history

So how does “On This Day…1776” work as a guidebook to that time in American history? Right now, two episodes in, the AI and the filmmakers’ tics are way too much of a distraction. As a costume drama, it seems all right on period appointments like clothing, housewares and such. The exterior of the Longfellow House in Cambridge, Massachusetts, where Washington had his headquarters that winter, was strikingly on point — I used to walk by the real thing nearly every day, and I recognized it right away.

I was pleased to see episode 2’s focus on Common Sense, a stirring exhortation for the American colonists to oppose tyranny that was immensely influential at that time and that doesn’t always get the attention today that it deserves.

Fifty years ago, when the country was celebrating its 200th anniversary, CBS ran a series of Bicentennial Minutes that aired nightly during prime time. A famous actor, politician or other celebrity would speak directly to the camera, the graphics were low-key, and we learned a little bit about Boston’s Liberty Tree, Congress debating the Articles of Confederation or an incident on a small island in New York harbor.

They were much more humble reflections than we’re getting from Primordial Soup. I was in high school at that time and a dedicated TV viewer, and I remember enjoying those minutes, slight as they were. (Hey, I did go on to be a history major in college.) 

The press materials for “On This Day…1776” make a point of saying that its re-creations are “reframing the Revolution not as a foregone conclusion but as a fragile experiment shaped by those who fought for it.”

It’s an excellent point. The success of the American Revolution was not guaranteed, and the effort to create something new and worthwhile was often in jeopardy.

We are at a similar stage, living a real-time experiment of fitting AI into human company in a healthy, survivable way. Whether we succeed or not will be for history to judge.

I do have to point out that in the Common Sense episode, “Aamereedd” made only that one split-second appearance. In all other views of the pamphlet’s cover — I counted at least two dozen — the name of the new land showed up clear as day and correctly spelled: America.

Technologies

Bessent tells Russia no economic relief will come until Ukraine war ends as Europe isolates Moscow at G20

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov that no economic relief or new agreements can be made while the war in Ukraine continues, during a rare G20 meeting in Asheville, North Carolina.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent reportedly told Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov that no sanctions relief or new agreements with Moscow were possible, as long as the war in Ukraine continues.

The two officials met on the sidelines of a Group of 20 finance leaders gathering in Asheville, North Carolina.

Bessent’s remarks came as Siluanov’s first in-person appearance at the summit since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 drew objections from other European leaders. European governments have planned to expand sanctions to further squeeze Moscow’s economy and finances.

The rare meeting underscored Washington’s willingness to reopen high-level diplomatic channels with Moscow, even as European allies have intended to keep the nation isolated while the war continues.

Bessent made it clear to Siluanov that “nothing is possible until the war is over,” when the Russian minister brought up other areas of mutual interest, Reuters reported.

The meeting centered on President Donald Trump’s peace plan for Ukraine and economic growth, according to Axios, while Russia’s finance ministry described the discussions as covering financial cooperation between the two nations within the G20 framework.

Russia’s surprise return to the table sparked dismay among European officials, who opposed appearing with Siluanov in the traditional G20 photo, which was ultimately taken without the Russian minister.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Venezuela grants U.S.-backed oil firm NABEP 100-year concessions for 17 oil fields, White House says

Venezuelan interim authorities have granted North American Blue Energy Partners 100-year concessions for 17 oil fields, White House says.

Venezuelan interim authorities have granted U.S.-backed North American Blue Energy Partners, or NABEP, 100-year concessions for 17 oil fields, with proven reserves of about 65 billion barrels, the White House said on Monday.

NABEP is the second-largest private oil producer in Venezuela. The company has granted the U.S. Department of War’s Office of Strategic Capital an equity stake of 35% in its corporate parent, according to the White House, representing up to “hundreds of billions in value and dividends for the United States.”

President Donald Trump announced Friday a deal with Caracas that would give the U.S. majority control over 65 billion barrels, or about 20% of the South American nation’s massive oil reserves. The U.S. had about 46 billion barrels in proven oil reserves as of end-2024, according to official figures.

In a fact sheet published Monday evening stateside, the U.S. government said it would enjoy the right to purchase, at production cost, a guaranteed 20% of the off-take from all current and future fields NABEP will operate, as part of an effort to facilitate refilling the U.S. strategic petroleum reserves.

The U.S. government also has the “right of first refusal” to purchase the remaining 80% of NABEP’s production, making Washington the prioritized buyer for its energy reserves.

Analysts, however, remained skeptical that the landmark oil deal could meaningfully boost the U.S. energy production and bring down gas prices for Americans in the near term. Huge investments are needed to extract the rich resources in Venezuela, whose oil output remains at a fraction of its capacity due to decades of mismanagement, lack of investment and sanctions.

NABEP also planned to invest up to $100 billion in new oil infrastructure in Venezuela to scale production, the White House said. Under the agreement, the company is expected to pay $200 billion in royalty and tax payments to Venezuelan governments over the first 25 years.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Tanker hit in Strait of Hormuz, sparking escalation fears as Trump pledges severe response to Iran

A tanker was struck by three unidentified projectiles in the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, raising concerns about a potential escalation in the Middle East conflict, as President Trump vowed a severe response to Iran.

A tanker was struck by three unidentified projectiles while navigating the Strait of Hormuz on Monday, raising concerns that the Middle East conflict could flare up again.

The vessel was traveling in the southern shipping lane near the Omani coast, according to a Tuesday statement from the UK Maritime Trade Operations agency, posted in Asia time. No injuries were reported.

Iran launched an attack on two U.S. bases in Jordan on Monday in retaliation for America’s strike on its Larak Island. U.S. forces targeted two Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island on Sunday, reportedly killing three, claiming that Tehran intended to fire rockets carrying sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz.

The small island, situated in the Strait of Hormuz, has been a critical military and shipping control point for Iranian forces, enabling them to maintain tight control over vessel traffic through one of the world’s most vital maritime routes.

The tit-for-tat hostilities marked the first time in over a month that the U.S. and Iran have exchanged strikes.

While neither side appears to be seeking a return to full-scale war, both have signaled readiness to respond to further attacks. “We are going to hit them hard,” President Donald Trump told Fox News on Monday, stating that “there will be a response” to Iran’s attacks on U.S. military bases in the region.

Analysts largely view the U.S. attack on Larak Island as an attempt to break a deadlock rather than a shift in strategy. “By targeting the launchers rather than broader Iranian military infrastructure, the U.S. seems to be punishing a specific behavior rather than, at least for now, expanding its war aims,” said Ali Vaez, deputy program director at International Crisis Group.

“It is enforcing the blockade,” said Jason Brodsky, policy director of United Against Nuclear Iran, adding that the Trump administration’s goal is to further degrade Tehran’s ability to mine the Strait of Hormuz, while focusing on economic coercive measures as the midterm elections approach.

Washington has intensified pressure to squeeze Iran’s already weakened economy with “secondary sanctions” that penalize nations and businesses buying Iranian crude. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday, on the sidelines of the Group of 20 finance ministers’ gathering, that Iran was “lashing out kinetically” because the new sanctions were taking a toll on its economy.

Speaking from the Oval Office on Monday, Trump reportedly said that Iran’s financial systems, armed forces, and governing body have largely degraded. “It doesn’t mean we won’t smack them to see what happens,” the president said.

The war, now entering its seventh month, has disrupted global energy supplies and sent shockwaves through global financial markets. International oil benchmark Brent surged past $90 a barrel amid renewed hostilities and last traded at $91.08 on Tuesday. U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures added less than 1% to $86.65 per barrel.

“This is fundamentally an endurance contest,” said Brodsky, as Trump has demonstrated an “unpredictability” that should concern the Iranians, and Tehran may lash out more aggressively militarily as economic pressure mounts.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media