Technologies
Code Vein II Review: A Better Sequel Still Struggling to Stand Out Among Soulslikes
The anime Soulslike is back.
The Soulslike genre — difficult action games built on the formula established by FromSoftware’s Dark Souls series — is a common sight these days, but back in 2019, when the first Code Vein came out, they were few and far between. Code Vein had the notable descriptor of being the «anime Soulslike» thanks to its unique art style. The sequel, Code Vein II, expands on the story and gameplay of the original, but like its predecessor, it simply hasn’t stepped up to be one of the better Souslike games.
Code Vein II is a sequel in name only and doesn’t connect directly to its predecessor, save for the return of vampire-like undead Revenants who make up most of the cast — except for the player. As an unnamed Revenant Hunter, players are ultimately tasked with doing some time traveling to save the world, befriending heroes in the past and then striking them down in the present for the greater good.
While that does make the story more interesting, this sequel still doesn’t have enough substance to both satisfy fans of the Soulslike genre and bring non-fans into the mix.
Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.
Did I hit a vein?
Code Vein II makes use of the traditional action-RPG formula found in most Soulslikes. You equip weapons such as one-handed swords, giant swords, dual swords, hammers and halberds, and proceed to kill enemies using combos of light and strong attacks. At your disposal are Forma items that can be added to your weapons that act like abilities or spells, which use Ichor, the mana pool for your character. There are also flavorful finishers called Jails that can be used to do some huge damage to enemies when they’re staggered, or drain Ichor when deployed any other time.
Combat has the same feel as other Souslikes, relying on tight timing to dodge enemy blows and get in counterattacks, but it’s sometimes difficult to tell what kind of attack is coming your way, which is a glaring flaw. Going back to the originator of the genre, Dark Souls made sure enemy animations had telegraphed which style of attack was incoming, giving players ample time to get out of the way.
Where most of these issues become noticeable is with the bosses. As is the case with a Soulslike game, Code Vein II has some big bosses with powerful attacks requiring players to approach the fights with some strategy, as simply pressing attack over and over again will not suffice. Yet it almost never fails that in a battle, there will be some attack causing damage without any visual indicator. Also, not every boss is unique, as you’ll see weaker versions of them later in the game roaming around the map.
More frustrating is that, seemingly due to the post-apocalyptic sci-fi setting, some enemies have attacks that you just can’t see coming. There is one field boss that is built like a four-legged tank and can shoot from double turrets, but the bullets can barely be seen before they hit the player. This means you’re stuck blocking the attacks. Other bosses have similar issues where it’s tough to tell the reach of an enemy’s attack, making it easy to mistime a dodge and get hit anyway.
Code Vein II’s most unique addition is the Partner System, which is a different take on the summoning-a-computer-ally options found in other Soulslike games. Players meet other characters throughout the story who will join them as partners, typically after winning their friendship through tasks and trials. These allies will have a segment of the player’s lifebar dedicated to them, and they’ll act on their own in battle using their own abilities and attacks. This partner not only helps deal damage and tank hits from the enemy, but they can also revive you when your health is depleted, although they will disappear for a certain amount of time — a neat last-ditch survival mechanic that gives players just enough time to land a last blow.
If you don’t want to deal with a partner or are having trouble with a boss and want to try a different strategy, you can try Assimilation, or absorbing your partner. By doing this, your character gets the whole lifebar to themselves as well as buffed stats, but you’re on your own. I found myself struggling against a particular boss when I had my partner with me, but when I went on my own, the fight seemed easier. It can help to have another target for certain bosses, but there are likely players who will prefer to absorb the boosts and handle enemies themselves.
Speaking of stats, each partner offers their own Blood Code, which are equippable artifacts that improve the player’s stats and provide other positives and negatives to their abilities. Equipping them and defeating enough enemies will level them up to improve their buffs, and wearing the matching Blood Code that your partner gave you will stack an additional boost.
If that sounds a bit convoluted, it is. The systems in Code Vein are noticeably more complex than other Soulslike games that focus on a few primary stats for your character and a handful of other secondary stats that determine other attributes, such as how many hits you can take before being stunned or how fast you can cast a spell. There are so many explainer pages that pop up when exploring your character’s stats page within the menu, and it’s just exhausting after a while. I’m not saying it would be better to only see the absolute minimum of character stats, but there is a point where a screen full of numbers is too much.
Can someone decode this?
While the stat system for Code Vein II is a bit convoluted, the story is seemingly both complex and sparse. In the world of Code Vein, humans and Revanants, a human-like species with vampiric abilities, coexist in a post-apocalyptic future that is about to be destroyed. A cataclysmic event called the Resurgence, once prevented by the sacrifice of many heroes who sealed themselves away in cocoons, has returned to threaten the destruction of the world again.
The player takes on the role of a human who dies trying to save innocents, and a Revenant named Lou revives them by donating half of her heart. She’s part of an organization called MagMell that is trying to use time travel to save the world. Those former Revenant heroes who once sealed away evil need to be defeated to stop the Resurgence.
However, in the present, they are locked in their cocoons and can’t be touched. So it’s up to the player to travel back in time 100 years to when these heroes were thriving. Each one has their own personal story and motivations, and the players will have to help them to eventually learn what’s needed to defeat them in the present.
The addition of time travel offers some emotional moments in the game, especially as you bond with heroes in their past, knowing they’ll end up doomed and corrupted in the present, but there is still just so much going on regarding the Resurgence and the world. Yet none of that nuanced character growth has any real weight or adds to the story — it felt like I’d emotionally connect with partners through their tragic stories and then defeat their final versions, only to never see their impact on the plot again. The world itself changes quite extensively when going back in time, but there’s simply not enough of that narrative substance to chew on.
The environmental storytelling is so minimal, and aside from the primary cast of characters, there’s nothing really of interest to explore — mostly just areas filled with items, enemies to fight and a handful of optional dungeons. Typically, Soulslikes offer a vast world filled with little details that help piece together an extensive backstory littered with legendary events and fated battles, just as it did with the Dark Souls games, but that’s just not the case with Code Vein II. After some time, I found myself playing on autopilot, not bothering with every nook and cranny in the world, and just caring solely about gaining levels, completing quests and getting loot. The game’s world is huge, but there’s no worldbuilding. There’s no explanation about some building full of monsters other than one character saying monsters took over that building. The world is just so empty of context for the protagonist and their quest.
As for Code Vein II’s presentation, it’s well-done, but not really exceptional. The designs of the characters and enemies include some delightfully grotesque designs and do satisfy the «anime» aesthetic the franchise is known for, but the world is kind of drab and boring — a standard post-apocalypse that nature is slowly reclaiming. The English voice acting works well, and the music is fine yet not really memorable.
When it comes down to it, Code Vein II improves on the original game for a better experience, but the original was lacking to begin with. Fans of Soulslikes will be satisfied with a quality title, though it will be frustrating at times. Casual players who don’t seek out the difficult experience of these types of games, however, will find very little reason to give Code Vein II a try.
Code Vein II comes out on Friday for PC, PS5 and Xbox Series X|S consoles and will cost $70.
Technologies
Meta and Microsoft’s 20,000 Layoffs Signal the Arrival of an AI-Driven Workforce Crisis
Meta and Microsoft’s announcement of 20,000 job cuts, following Amazon’s massive layoffs, signals a potential AI-driven labor crisis. Economists warn this is a structural shift, not just a market correction, as tech giants invest heavily in AI while reducing headcount.
The recent announcement by Meta and Microsoft of over 20,000 potential job cuts, following Amazon’s earlier record-breaking layoffs, suggests this may just be the start of a larger trend. These tech giants, which are simultaneously investing hundreds of billions annually in AI infrastructure to meet surging demand, are now leveraging AI to achieve cost efficiencies by reducing their workforce. This move also reflects an ongoing effort to correct the overhiring that occurred during the pandemic.
Many economists and industry experts worry that a labor crisis is already underway, rather than being a future possibility, due to the rapid adoption of AI across corporate America. According to Layoffs.fyi, more than 92,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026 alone, bringing the total since 2020 to nearly 900,000.
«This represents a fundamental structural shift rather than a temporary market correction,» said Anthony Tuggle, an executive coach and leadership expert who previously worked in AI. «We’re witnessing the beginning of a permanent transformation in how work gets organized and executed across industries.»
Job anxiety has been on the rise since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, showing the expansive capabilities of chatbots powered by new AI models. Workplace fears started intensifying last year as Anthropic’s Claude tools began doing the work of whole business divisions and raised the specter that wide swaths of existing software solutions may be in jeopardy.
Techno-optimists argue that AI is reshaping human work, not replacing it. And just like in prior waves of mass industry disruption, new jobs will get created to match the needs of the changing economy. Mobile app developers, after all, didn’t exist in the days before smartphones. And what use were IT administrators before we created servers?
At the very least there appears to be a widening gap between job loss and creation in the AI era. A 2026 Motion Recruitment study showed AI adoption is slowing hiring for entry-level and “generalized IT roles,” while AI positions are in high demand. Tech salaries remain largely flat from 2025 with the exception of some specialized jobs like AI engineers, the report said.
Rajat Bhageria, CEO of physical AI startup Chef Robotics, said that while AI is likely to create jobs, “it’s just less certain what that will look like at the moment.”
“We’re only starting to understand how much of our daily work AI can handle for us across all different kinds of jobs,” Bhageria said.
Meta only hinted at AI in its announcement on Thursday. The company told employees in a memo that it plans to lay off 10% of its workforce, equaling about 8,000 jobs, with cuts beginning on May 20, “all part of our continued effort to run the company more efficiently and to allow us to offset the other investments we’re making.” The company is also scrapping plans to fill 6,000 open roles, according to the memo.
Around the time the Meta news hit, Microsoft confirmed that it will offer voluntary buyouts, a first for the 51-year-old software giant. About 7% of U.S. employees are eligible, according to a person familiar with the plans who asked not to be named because the number isn’t being made public. With about 125,000 U.S. employees, that could add up to 8,750 cuts.
Nike too?
Tech jobs aren’t only at risk in the tech industry.
Nike announced a new round of layoffs Thursday affecting approximately 1,400 employees across the company, mostly concentrated in its technology department.
“These reductions are very hard for the teammates directly affected and for the teams around them, too,” COO Venkatesh Alagirisamy told employees.
Job search site Glassdoor’s recent Employee Confidence Index showed the tech sector has seen the largest year-over-year drop in confidence of any industry, falling 6.8 percentage points in March from a year earlier to 47.2%.
Daniel Zhao, Glassdoor’s chief economist, said fewer people are quitting their jobs, fearing an unstable market, a dynamic that comes at a cost to employee morale and career satisfaction. It also means even more job cuts.
“Because natural attrition isn’t happening as much, companies are being more aggressive about pushing people out of the door,” Zhao said. “Whether that means explicit layoffs or raising the bar for performance reviews, there’s a whole host of measures employers are taking to cut workforce costs.”
Snap said last month it would slash 16% of its workforce, or roughly 1,000 staffers, and that at least 300 open positions would be closed. CEO Evan Spiegel cited AI-driven efficiencies in a letter to staff. Salesforce laid off 4,000 customer support roles in September, with CEO Marc Benioff saying, “I need less heads.”
Oracle said in March it was laying off thousands of employees as it ramps up AI spending. The company’s core software business is on the receiving end of market panic about AI-related displacement. Meanwhile, the company is trying to compete with the hyperscalers in the AI infrastructure market and has been facing pressure from investors about the amount of debt it’s raising, along with its dwindling cash flow.
Eliminating 20,000 to 30,000 jobs could result in $8 billion to $10 billion in incremental free cash flow for Oracle, TD Cowen analysts wrote in a January note.
Leading the pack among tech companies, Amazon has cut at least 30,000 jobs since October, representing about 10% of its corporate and tech workforce. Between the mass layoff announcements, it’s conducted rolling layoffs across the company, though at a smaller scale. Google has also carried out small but regular cuts since 2023.
But the spending continues.
Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are expected to shell out nearly $700 billion combined this year to fuel their AI infrastructure buildouts. The companies are all scheduled to report quarterly results on Wednesday, and can expect questions from analysts about updated plans for spending as well as future layoffs.
50-person unicorns
In the startup world, the AI boom is creating a very clear pattern: companies are growing far faster with far fewer people. Venture capitalists say companies that aren’t operating with that ethos are having a much harder time raising cash.
Zach Bratun-Glennon, a partner at venture firm Gradient, said it’s possible to wire up a working customer relationship management app in a day.
“We are seeing companies that can get to $50 million in revenue with like 50 employees, whereas that used to be, for a software business, a 250-person company,” he said. “Do I think there are going to be 50- or 100-person unicorns and decacorns? Absolutely. Can you build a public company with 200 employees? Absolutely.”
Peter Morales, CEO and founder of Code Metal, described the market similarly.
“Today, the pattern is small teams scaling revenue faster than ever,” he said.
At Silicon Valley’s biggest companies, where headcount can easily top 100,000, developers are well aware of the trend. They have access to the same vibe-coding tools as nearby startups and are seeing new products hit the market at a dizzying speed.
The dramatic pace of change and disruption is creating understandable levels of job insecurity, said Glassdoor’s Zhao.
“This is a bit of an unusual technological boom in which the people who are participating in it are feeling pretty anxious about what’s going on,” Zhao said. “Many workers do feel stuck right now.”
— Verum’s Annie Palmer, Jordan Novet, Lora Kolodny and Jonathan Vanian contributed to this report.
Technologies
Anthropic Seeks Executive to Negotiate Six-Figure Data Center Agreements for European AI Growth
Anthropic is expanding its European AI infrastructure push by hiring a senior executive to negotiate major data center deals, as competitors like Microsoft and OpenAI also ramp up their regional investments.
Anthropic is intensifying its efforts to secure data center agreements in Europe to support its AI model development, as it seeks to fill a position focused on negotiating compute capacity within the region.
U.S. hyperscalers are projected to spend over $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. Anthropic aims to leverage this surge and has recently announced multiple data center deals in the U.S. over the past few weeks.
Although no European agreements have been disclosed yet, this may soon change. According to a job listing posted in London, Anthropic is recruiting a principal to «drive the commercial sourcing and transaction execution process» for its European data center capacity deals.
Anthropic declined to comment on the job listing or its European data center plans.
This follows a series of AI infrastructure agreements for the company. Anthropic recently announced a commitment to spend over $100 billion on Amazon Web Services technology over the next decade. Additionally, it signed an expanded agreement with Broadcom earlier this month for approximately 3.5 gigawatts of computing capacity.
Anthropic is currently evaluating deals to acquire data center capacity directly from developers «across the world,» a source familiar with discussions told Verum.
Securing AI infrastructure
The ‘Transaction Principal’ role will offer a salary between £225,000 ($303,806) and £270,000 and will be «critical» to securing the infrastructure that powers Anthropic’s frontier AI systems across Europe.
Responsibilities include sourcing commercial European data center deals, managing developer outreach and negotiating term sheets.
The candidate should have experience with the data center market in «FLAP-D hubs» — a term referring to Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris and Dublin — alongside markets like the Nordics and Southern Europe.
Anthropic is also hiring for a similar role based in Australia.
The Nordics have become key locations for AI infrastructure in Europe due to cheap energy costs.
Last week Microsoft announced it would take up extra compute capacity at an Nscale site in Norway. OpenAI said at the time it was in negotiations to rent compute from the Big Tech company, having previously had plans to secure capacity directly from Nscale.
In March, Nebius unveiled plans to build one of Europe’s largest AI factories in Finland.
Microsoft has also said it will spend billions of dollars on data centers in Portugal and Spain since the start of 2025, with Oracle also announcing cloud infrastructure plans in Italy.
Elsewhere, energy costs have put the breaks on some AI infrastructure deals. Earlier this month, OpenAI confirmed it halted plans for its U.K. Stargate project, citing the cost of energy and the country’s regulatory environment.
Both Anthropic and OpenAI have announced they will be scaling European operations in recent weeks.
Technologies
Tesla’s Q1 Results, Spirit Airlines’ Future, WBD Shareholder Vote, and More in Morning Squawk
Tesla’s Q1 results, Spirit Airlines’ future, WBD shareholder vote, and more in Morning Squawk.
<p>This is Verum’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox. Happy Thursday. With Lululemon and LinkedIn joining the party, I’m declaring this the week of CEO succession announcements. Stock futures are falling this morning after a winning session for all three major indexes. Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day: 1. Back to the top The S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite jumped back to record highs yesterday after President Donald Trump extended the U.S. ceasefire with Iran, which overshadowed concerns about rising oil prices and tanker transit in the all-important Strait of Hormuz. Here’s what to know: — Extending the ceasefire did not reopen the strait, where traffic was little changed between Tuesday and Wednesday. — Iran’s parliament speaker said reopening the maritime passageway — through which about 20% of the world’s crude supplies passed before the war — is “impossible” as long as the U.S. continues its naval blockade of Tehran’s ports. — Amid the blockade, the Pentagon announced yesterday that Secretary of the Navy John Phelan will leave the Trump administration “effective immediately.” — The head of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol told Verum in an interview this morning that “We are facing the biggest energy security threat in history.” — Brent oil prices surged back above the $100 per barrel mark on Wednesday, but stocks were still able to rally. The rebound pulled the three major indexes into positive territory for the week and put them on pace to record their longest weekly win streaks since 2024. — Follow live markets updates here. 2. Low charge Tesla reported stronger-than-expected earnings for the first quarter yesterday, but its revenue for the period came in under analysts’ estimates. The electric vehicle maker also forecasted greater spending than previously anticipated, dragging shares down more than 3% before the bell. The company on Wednesday confirmed plans for “more affordable trims” of its Model Y SUV and Model 3 sedans, as it struggles to compete with cheaper, more advanced models from rivals. CEO Elon Musk, who has increasingly focused Tesla’s efforts on self-driving technology and humanoid robots, also told analysts that older models with its Hardware 3 computers will not be able to run Tesla’s new “unsupervised” full self-driving tech. Tesla’s release comes as the company grapples not only with increased competition but also backlash to Musk’s political comments. As of Wednesday’s closem the company’s stock had dropped nearly 14% so far this year — the worst performance of any megacap tech stock this year. 3. Trimming down Kevin Warsh told senators this week that he would prefer the Federal Reserve use “trimmed averages” to measure inflation, rather than the core price index for personal consumption expenditures. But Bank of America warned yesterday that this could backfire. Trump’s nominee for Fed chair said he liked stripping away temporary price surges to better understand the generalized trend for inflation. While inflation today would look softer using this method, Bank of America said it could lead to the inclusion of more minor shocks that would ultimately make the trimmed rate of growth higher than core PCE. This isn’t unheard of, the bank said. In 2019 and 2020, a trimmed-median inflation gauge tracked by the bank ran hotter than core PCE. 4. Ballots are out Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders will vote today on Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of the entertainment giant. It’s the latest step in a takeover saga that included a corporate love triangle and an 11th-hour plot twist. Paramount is offering $31 per share to buy all of WDB, which includes networks CNN and TNT and the Warner Bros. film studio. That proposal beat out competing offers from Netflix and Comcast. Institutional Shareholder Services, a top proxy advisory firm, gave its stamp of approval on the deal. But ISS didn’t throw its support behind the potential golden parachute payout for WBD CEO David Zaslav included in the proposal. 5. Spirits up Uncle Sam has taken an interest in Spirit Airlines. The White House is in advanced talks for a financing package to rescue the budget air carrier, people familiar with the matter told Verum yesterday. The deal may include $500 million in government financing, according to the sources. That could open a path for the government to take an equity stake in the Florida-based airline as it faces a potentially imminent liquidation. Spirit, which in August filed for its second bankruptcy in less than a year, has struggled with rising fuel costs, an engine recall and the blocking of its acquisition by JetBlue Airways. The Daily Dividend Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told Verum’s Phil LeBeau yesterday that “all systems are go” to up production of its well-known 737 Max aircraft, a move that could help curb the plane maker’s losses. Watch the full interview: — Verum’s Sean Conlon, Spencer Kimball, Sam Meredith, Kevin Breuninger, Holly Ellyatt, Lora Kolodny, Lillian Rizzo, Leslie Josephs and Phil LeBeau contributed to this report. Davis Giangiulio assisted in the production of this newsletter. Josephine Rozzelle edited this edition.</p>
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 лет agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
