Technologies
I Tested the New $300 Moto G Power: Great Battery Life but Not Enough Elsewhere
Review: The 2026 budget Motorola phone lasts for two days on a single battery charge, but it’s not more powerful than others in the Moto G lineup.
Pros
- Classy looks
- Long battery life
- Ultrawide camera expands photo options
Cons
- Sluggish performance
- Lacks wireless charging
I find the new $300 Moto G Power to be one of the most aesthetically pleasing budget phones I’ve tested. I just wish the 2026 model offered some elevated features and improved functionality to accompany its elegant look.Â
For example, my review unit came with the Pantone pure cashmere vegan leather back cover. Its metal-finished sides have a champagne color that complements the back, giving it a classy look.
But I was sorely disappointed to see wireless charging removed from the 2026 model after it was included on previous Moto G Power models, which, to me, provided substantial value for a phone in this price range. Motorola appears to have made up for it by beefing up the battery, along with touching up the cameras.Â
I appreciated the improved battery life, which easily stretches into a second day of moderate use on a single charge. I can also take a few nice photos with the camera when there’s good lighting, but indoor and low-light environments can lead to some blurriness.Â
Most of these compromises are typical of this price range. Yet what concerns me most is that the 2026 Moto G Power uses the same processor as last year’s model, and is identical to what Motorola includes in the $200 Moto G. At a time when there are an incredible number of affordable phones for people to choose from, it’s disappointing to see how Motorola’s approach undercuts many of the features that made previous Moto G Power models stand out from the crowd. As I tested the new Power, I couldn’t help but question whether this year’s phone offers enough to justify the extra $100, when some aspects feel identical to those cheaper Moto models.
The Moto G Power comes with two years of software updates and three years of security updates, which is a common offering in this price range, but falls short of the six-year commitment Samsung provides for its budget phones.Â
Moto G Power (2026) design, features, battery
The Moto G Power’s highlight feature is its 5,200-mAh battery, which easily lasted me nearly two days between charges. While the battery size is the same as what Motorola provides in the cheaper $200 Moto G, I’m glad to see the Power’s two-day battery life, considering it has a bigger, higher-resolution display.Â
30-Minute wired fast charging test
| Phone | Percent increase | Battery capacity | Wall plug wattage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Motorola Moto G Power (2026) | 56% | 5,000mAh | 30W |
| Motorola Moto G Play (2026) | 35% | 5,200mAh | 18W |
| Samsung Galaxy A36 | 31% | 5,000mAh | 45W |
| Motorola Moto G Power (2025) | 61% | 5,000mAh | 30W |
During a 45-minute endurance test, the Moto G Power’s battery level depleted from 100% to 93% — that’s better than last year’s Power, which dropped to 88%. The Power supports up to 30-watt wired charging, which recharged the battery from 0% to 56% in 30 minutes.
The 6.8-inch 1,080p display does the job when watching YouTube without significantly compromising video quality. I ran the display with the “hypersmooth” refresh rate option, supporting up to 120Hz, and the “vivid” color option. I wouldn’t say it looked particularly vivid, but it provided noticeable smoothness and color compared to the more muted displays on the cheaper Moto G phones. In cooking videos, the food looked good but not especially detailed.Â
Audio also plays loudly from the stereo speakers, making the Moto G Power particularly well-suited as a lower-cost media player for music and videos.
Gaming, however, is not a strong suit for the Moto G Power. Since the phone uses the same processor as last year’s Moto G Power and the Moto G, you may need to run games at lower graphics settings to ensure they work well. Most simple games will be fine, but I wouldn’t consider this a cheaper way to let your kid play Fortnite. Titles like the 2D dungeon crawling battles in Dead Cells look fine, but I tried to play Red Dead Redemption, and the opening cutscene seems unable to render characters and scenery.
During our benchmark testing, the MediaTek Dimensity 6300 performed very similarly to the $160 Moto G Play, which also runs on the same processor, although the cheaper phone has less onboard memory and storage.Â
3DMark Wild Life Extreme
Geekbench v.6.0
- Single-core
- Multicore
And this is where I have some confusion about the ways Motorola justifies the Moto G Power’s $300 price compared to $160 and $200 phones. When it comes to multitasking, the Power just doesn’t feel more powerful.
Even though the phone has 8GB of RAM, which is double the Moto G’s 4GB, I experienced noticeable sluggishness when opening and closing apps, loading games and taking video calls. I’m disappointed that the phone struggles with basic multitasking, such as texting while chatting on a video call. All these tasks work on the phone, but I needed to use Motorola’s RAM Boost feature, which converts a portion of the storage into RAM to help alleviate the bumps.Â
Moto G Power cameras
The Moto G Power’s cameras are identical to those of last year’s model. The 50-megapixel main camera is complemented by an 8-megapixel ultrawide camera, enabling the phone to be more versatile than the cheaper Moto G baseline phones, which have a single rear camera. The photos turn out OK for the price but aren’t especially detailed in most settings.Â
In ideal settings, such as a sunny window, photos taken with the 50-megapixel main camera at 1x and 2x zoom show off my friend’s cat, Charlie, soaking up the sun. Her orange coat fur is visible, although the actual details in her hair blur together when I zoomed in to 2x.
The ultrawide photo has a wider field of view and even picks up some of the scratches on the dining room table. No doubt that this scene’s stillness helped the camera take such a sharp and detailed image.
Scenes with slight motion, however, are noticeably challenging for the Moto G Power, especially in low light. In the nighttime street photo below, a slow-moving car in the scene is blurry. And the ultrawide photo appears even darker since its sensor captures less light.
Although the Moto G Power features a new 32-megapixel front-facing camera, up from last year’s 16-megapixel one, I still feel that the selfie camera struggles with detail. In one selfie I took at the well-lit German restaurant Schmidt’s in Columbus, Ohio, the photo looks like me, but details like my facial hair and skin feel smoothed over by noise reduction.
And in the even darker selfie photo below that I took at nighttime on a New York street, the image is blurry and lacks detail, especially in my hair.Â
I feel like the Moto G Power’s cameras are functional for most day-to-day quick photos, but if attending a more special occasion like a wedding, I would probably consider getting a disposable film camera.
Moto G Power (2026) bottom line
I wanted more from the $300 Moto G Power. It’s still a good phone for the price, even though I’m unconvinced by some of its changes. For instance, Qi wireless charging on the 2024 and 2025 editions was excellent, providing more options for using your phone. In 2026, the lack of wireless charging is a notable omission, especially if you’re coming from the 2024 model.
The Moto G Power’s long battery life is where the phone truly shines. It easily powers the big screen, which is great if you prioritize video streaming, browsing websites and using its speakers to play music. I wish the Moto G Power had a slightly more powerful processor, especially compared to its more affordable Moto G siblings.Â
If you just need a cheap Android phone and don’t care about having the bigger, higher-resolution screen, you could probably save money and go with the cheaper Moto G or Moto G Play. Or you could consider buying last year’s Moto G Power at a discount.
Although it’s not a particularly powerful phone, the 2026 Moto G Power at least offers a long-lasting battery and an elegant design for its price.
How we test phones
Every phone tested by CNET’s reviews team was used in the real world. We test a phone’s features, play games and take photos. We examine the display to see if it’s bright, sharp and vibrant. We analyze the design and build to determine how it holds up and whether it has an IP rating for water resistance. We push the processor’s performance to the extremes using standardized benchmark tools like GeekBench and 3DMark, along with our own anecdotal observations navigating the interface, recording high-resolution videos and playing graphically intense games at high refresh rates.
All the cameras are tested in a variety of conditions, from bright sunlight to dark indoor scenes. We try out special features like night mode and portrait mode, and compare our findings against similarly priced competing phones. We also check out the battery life by using it daily, as well as running a series of battery drain tests.
We also consider additional features, such as support for 5G, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and face sensors, stylus support, fast charging speeds, and foldable displays, among others, that can be beneficial. We balance all of this against the price to give you the verdict on whether that phone, regardless of its price, actually represents good value. While these tests may not always be reflected in CNET’s initial review, we conduct follow-up and long-term testing in most circumstances.
Technologies
Trump Maintains US‑Iran Negotiations Continue Amid Tehran’s Denials of Duplicity
President Trump insists that US‑Iran talks are ongoing despite Tehran’s denial of any negotiation plans, while warning that only a deal or total surrender will allow passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Conflicting statements from both sides have heightened uncertainty as the conflict enters its sixth month.
On Monday, President Donald Trump asserted that negotiations between the United States and Iran are still taking place, even after Tehran stated it has no intention of engaging in direct talks with Washington.
In a fiery Truth Social post, Trump labeled Iran’s leaders “unbelievably duplicitous,” claiming they are lying about ongoing peace talks “whether Iran wants to admit it or not.” He repeated his assertion that the United States completely controls the Strait of Hormuz, despite maritime traffic through the crucial route lingering at only a small fraction of pre‑conflict levels.
He wrote, “Nothing reaches Iran unless we allow it, and nothing will pass unless a deal—or total surrender—is achieved.”
Earlier that day, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei told reporters there is no imminent plan for U.S.–Iran negotiations, contradicting Trump’s earlier comment that talks would resume Monday afternoon. Baghaei added that Iran’s only current discussions are with Oman concerning the Strait of Hormuz.
The conflicting statements have heightened uncertainty over the peace‑talk process and the broader conflict, now in its sixth month.
Trump’s assertion about new negotiations came a day after he said on Truth Social that he had agreed to cancel a massive strike against Iran “subject to being able to rapidly make a DEAL.” He said in the same post that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries had asked him to hold off on that attack because “the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”
Trump has claimed dozens of times throughout the more‑than‑five‑month‑long war that a deal is at hand. No permanent deal has been signed, and a temporary ceasefire reached in June has fallen apart.
Trump has also repeatedly threatened to launch devastating strikes against Iran before backing off. After the latest example, oil prices on Monday fell and stocks surged.
BMI, a research unit of Fitch Solutions, said in a note Monday that a broader diplomatic understanding on reopening the Strait of Hormuz is still achievable this quarter, while raising the probability of its escalation scenario to 35% from 25%, citing mounting military, diplomatic and economic signs of rising U.S.-Iran tensions.
“Diplomatic progress is likely to be punctuated by periodic military flare-ups, while miscalculation by either side could trigger a renewed escalation,” BMI analysts wrote in a note. The firm said the key issue to watch is the future governance of the strait, as the Iran-Oman talks — potentially backed by Gulf states, China and the U.S. — point to efforts to build a post-conflict shipping framework.
Shipping risks persist even as diplomacy appears to be advancing. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations Centre said it received a report of an incident 20 nautical miles (23 miles) northeast of Khasab, Oman — at the mouth of the strait — with a tanker’s master reporting an explosion in close proximity to the vessel at about 20:37 UTC Sunday (4:37 pm ET). The vessel and crew were safe and authorities are investigating, UKMTO said, advising ships to transit with caution.
The proposal Trump announced over the weekend calls for the U.S. and Iran to return to negotiations and continue ironing out some of the thorny issues that had derailed diplomatic efforts, according to The Associated Press, citing a regional official involved in the mediation efforts.
The official said the proposal also includes a reopening of the Hormuz Strait and halting attacks across the region, including by Iranian-backed militias in Iraq on the Arab Gulf countries and Jordan.
The U.S., for its part, will end its naval blockade on Iran and allow Tehran to export its oil, the official said, adding that no deal has been reached, although the mediation efforts remained underway.
Trump’s weekend reversal has lowered the temperature after days of escalating attacks across the Gulf. Kuwait said Saturday that Iranian forces launched a wave of drones within its airspace, with its military destroying multiple aircraft after Iran targeted critical infrastructure in the country’s north.
A parallel track with Muscat is also advancing. Iranian diplomats said Tehran was close to reaching a new arrangement with Oman to manage shipping through the Strait of Hormuz, a deal critical to preventing the war from escalating further, according to the Financial Times.
Iranian officials said negotiations over future management of the Hormuz Strait with Oman, which sits on the opposite shore of the waterway, are in their final stages. The agreed shipping route would be different from those used before, according to Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson, Baghaei, adding that the new route was separate from the issue of the strait’s reopening or continued closure.
Technologies
Oil Prices Slide as Trump Halts Planned Iran Strike
Oil prices dropped after Trump cancelled a planned strike on Iran, with WTI down about 5% and Brent near 5% lower. He said the move followed requests from Tehran and regional allies for a pause while a deal shaping the Strait of Hormuz and Iran’s nuclear program is negotiated.
Oil prices fell on Monday after President Donald Trump announced he had cancelled a planned strike on Iran. WTI futures dropped roughly 5% to $80.34 a barrel, while Brent slipped about 4.7% to $83.77 a barrel.
Trump said early Sunday he called off the strike after Iran and several Middle Eastern nations asked him to hold off, noting that the outlines of a deal had been agreed upon. He added that the prospective accord would entail the immediate, full opening of the Strait of Hormuz and an end to Iran’s nuclear ambitions, according to his Truth Social post.
The president had been considering another round of strikes as diplomatic hopes waned since the conflict began on February 28. He said the U.S. and Iran would meet for talks on Monday, but Iran denied any scheduled negotiations with Washington, citing PressTV. Iran’s foreign‑ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei clarified that Tehran was only discussing shipping routes through the Strait of Hormuz with Oman. In a follow‑up Truth Social message, Trump insisted that, regardless of Iran’s acknowledgment, the United States is indeed discussing a solution to a long‑standing problem created by Iran.
Technologies
Oil Prices Drop as Trump Cancels Planned Attack on Iran
Oil prices fell sharply after President Trump announced the cancellation of a planned strike on Iran, citing a new deal that would open the Hormuz Strait and end Iran’s nuclear threat.
Oil prices fell sharply on Monday after President Donald Trump announced that he had called off a planned strike on Iran.
West Texas Intermediate futures, the U.S. benchmark, slipped roughly 5% to close at $80.34 per barrel, while Brent crude, the international benchmark, declined 4.7% to settle at $83.77 a barrel.
Trump made the announcement early Sunday, saying he had canceled the strike following requests from Tehran and other Middle Eastern countries.
In a Truth Social post, he wrote: “We have just been asked by Iran, and other Middle Eastern Countries, to hold off any attack in that the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to.”
The president indicated that the proposed agreement would include the immediate, complete, and total opening of the Hormuz Strait, as well as an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.
Trump had been weighing additional strikes amid diminishing prospects for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict that began on Feb. 28. He stated that the U.S. and Iran would hold negotiations on Monday.
Tehran denied that talks were planned with Washington, according to state news outlet PressTV.
Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei said Tehran was only holding talks with Oman regarding the routes ships can use through the Strait of Hormuz.
In a subsequent Truth Social post, Trump added that whether “Iran wants to admit it or not, we are, in fact, talking of a solution to a problem that they have caused for decades.”
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies3 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger



