Connect with us

Technologies

The Samsung Buds 3 FE Surprised Me in a Couple of Key Ways

The Galaxy Buds 3 FE cost $100 less than step-up Galaxy Buds 3 Pro and lack some nice features but they deliver excellent sound and may just be the better value.

Our Experts

Headshot of David Carnoy
David Carnoy Executive Editor / Reviews
Executive Editor David Carnoy has been a leading member of CNET’s Reviews team since 2000. He covers the gamut of gadgets and is a notable reviewer of mobile accessories and portable audio products, including headphones and speakers. He’s also an e-reader and e-publishing expert as well as the author of the novels Knife Music, The Big Exit and Lucidity. All the titles are available as Kindle, iBooks, Kobo e-books and audiobooks.
Expertise Headphones, Bluetooth speakers, mobile accessories, Apple, Sony, Bose, e-readers, Amazon, glasses, ski gear, iPhone cases, gaming accessories, sports tech, portable audio, interviews, audiophile gear, PC speakers Credentials

  • Maggie Award for Best Regularly Featured Web Column/Consumer
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

8.1/ 10
SCORE

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE

Pros

  • Lightweight and comfortable
  • Excellent sound quality if you get a tight seal
  • Good noise canceling performance
  • Top-tier voice-calling performance
  • Pinch-and-swipe controls work well
  • Bluetooth auto-switching between Samsung Galaxy devices you own

Cons

  • Missing some of the Buds 3 Pro’s features, including wireless charging, head-tracking and built-in voice controls and voice-detection
  • Some users may not be able to get a tight seal from the included eartips
  • Auto-switching between Galaxy devices but no real multipoint Bluetooth

Samsung’s Galaxy Buds 3 FE ($150) look nearly identical to the flagship Galaxy Buds 3 Pro ($250) but are missing those buds’ LED lighting element, have a single-driver design instead of a dual-driver design and leave off a few other extras. Now that I’ve fully tested the Buds 3 FE, I’m impressed with their performance. If you don’t mind missing those features, they’re a better value than the Buds 3 Pro. That’s why I’ve awarded them a CNET Editors’ Choice.

 Read moreBest wireless earbuds of 2025

All-black is a good look

Like the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro, the Galaxy Buds 3 FE have a noise-isolating design with silicone eartips, and they feature noise-canceling as well as a transparency mode. Aside from the missing lighting element, the biggest difference cosmetically are the color options for the Buds 3 FE, which are available in gray or black. I personally like the all-black version I received (it’s a matte finish, which is nice), and I preferred its dark vibe to that of the silver Buds 3 Pro I tested.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source on Chrome.


The Galaxy Buds 3 FE’s «blade» design is a departure from the previous Galaxy Buds FE ($70), which have a stemless design with wing tips that help lock the buds in your ears. I was still able to get a tight seal with the 3 FE’s largest included eartips, which is crucial for optimal sound quality and noise-canceling performance. But it was close call and I would have preferred if Samsung had included a slightly larger XL tip so I didn’t have to worry about losing the seal. If you’re unable to get a tight seal from any of the included tips (I suspect a certain small percentage of users will encounter this problem), you can seek out third-party tips.

The buds are lightweight at 5 grams per bud and fit my ears quite comfortably (the Buds 3 Pro weigh slightly more at 5.4 grams per bud). The Buds 3 FE have an IP54 rating, which means they’re splash-proof and dust-resistant (their case is not water-resistant and doesn’t offer wireless charging like the Buds 3 Pro’s case). Meanwhile the Buds 3 Pro have an IP57 rating, which means they’re dust-resistant and can be fully submerged in water for a short period of time.    

Better sound and noise canceling than I expected

I suspected there would be a slight drop-off in sound quality with the Galaxy Buds 3 FE, because of its less elaborate drivers. The more expensive Buds 3 Pro have a planar driver and a dynamic driver that helps improve clarity and treble performance, while the Buds 3 FE have a single 11mm dynamic driver. 

When I got the chance to compare them to one another directly, I was surprised. To my ears the Buds 3 FE sound as good or better than the Buds 3 Pro. They sound smooth and even-keeled, with nice detail, well-defined bass and good openness with a pretty wide soundstage. Android users can tweak the sound using the equalizer settings in the companion app (there are some preset EQs along with a fully customizable one you can create), but I mainly stuck with the default EQ setting.    

Usually buds with dual drivers deliver a bit richer sound with more depth to it, but the Buds 3 FE seem really well tuned; they just sound right. There are competing buds that offer slightly more energetic bass and sound more articulate and revealing, but they tend to cost more.

I faulted the Buds 3 Pro for not having better active noise canceling (ANC), but from my tests the Buds 3 FE seem to offer improved ANC performance a bit from the Buds 3 Pro. Although their noise canceling isn’t quite up to the level of what you get with the AirPods Pro 3 or Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen), it did a decent job muffling ambient noise across a fairly wide range of frequencies.

I also thought the voice-calling performance and transparency modes were good. Both the Buds 3 Pro and the Buds 3 FE are adept at filtering out background noise while picking up your voice well. As I walked the streets of New York, callers said they could hear some ambient sounds, including people’s voices, but they were fairly muted. And they said they could hear me «pretty clearly.» I give them an A- for voice-calling performance. 

Similar features to the Galaxy Buds 3 Pro (but missing some) 

I used the Buds 3 FE with Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 6 as well an iPhone 16 Pro. The audio wouldn’t automatically switch between my iPhone and Flip 6, but Samsung users get automatic pairing and switching between their Galaxy devices, including laptops. I was able to pair the buds with my Galaxy Tab 11 and Flip 6 and have the audio automatically switch between them. 

They have ear-detection sensors, but annoyingly they only pause your music automatically when you remove both buds from your ears and don’t resume playback when you put the buds back in (the Buds 3 Pro support the resume playback feature). Samsung’s standard 360 audio feature is supported via the Samsung Wearable app, but the Buds 3 FE do not have head-tracking like the Buds 3 Pro, which helps create enhanced spatial audio more akin to what you get with Apple’s AirPods Pro 3 and AirPods 4 buds. Also missing: There’s no support for LE audio along with the new Auracast feature that allows you to hear Bluetooth broadcasts in public places like gyms.

Samsung touts the Buds 3 FE’s AI features, which include «accessing Gemini for conversational AI assistance and Galaxy AI Interpreter app to use Real-Time Interpreter or Live Translate to translate phone calls.» Hands-free Google Assistant is available for Android devices but the Buds 3 FE are missing one of the Buds 3 Pro’s underrated features: built-in voice controls. These allow you to raise and lower volume, pause and play your music, skip tracks forward and back, and answer and end calls, with no wake word required. For example, you simply say, «play music,» «next song» or «volume down.» 

The Buds 3 FE are also missing the Buds 3 Pro’s Voice Detect feature (it can be toggled on or off in the Galaxy Wear app), which is similar to Apple’s Conversation Awareness mode that lowers the volume of the music or any audio you’re listening to and activates the buds’ ambient mode when you start talking to someone. Instead of pausing your music, it just reduces the volume to a low level. It’s a useful feature.

The Buds 3 FE are rated for up to 6 hours with ANC on and closer to 8 hours hours with it off. If you listen to your music at higher volume levels, those numbers will drop, as I ended up getting a little less than 5 hours with ANC on. The Buds 3 FE have similar battery life to the Buds 3 Pro but the total battery life with the case (up to 30 hours) is slightly better than the rating for the Buds 3 Pro’s battery life.

Here is a summation of what’s missing from the Galaxy Buds 3 FE compared to the Buds 3 Pro:

  • No wireless charging
  • No LED lighting element
  • No head-tracking
  • No support for LE Audio and Auracast
  • Buds 3 FE have ear-detection sensors but only pause your music when you take both buds out and don’t resume playback when you put them back in like Buds 3 Pro
  • No built-in voice controls like Buds 3 Pro (that don’t require a phone connection), although hands-free Google Assistant and Samsung’s Bixby are available for Android devices.
  • No voice-detect feature
  • IP54 (splash-proof) rating instead of IP57 (water-proof)

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE final thoughts

While the earlier Galaxy Buds FE seemed like a different set of earbuds from the Galaxy Buds Pro 2, the Galaxy Buds 3 FE hue more closely to the FE philosophy for other Samsung products (like phones and tablets). They truly appear to be a stripped down version of the flagship Galaxy Buds 3 Pro. When I dug a little deeper into the feature comparisons between the two Galaxy buds, I realized that the Buds 3 FE were missing more features than I thought they did. The majority I could live without (LED lighting elements, wireless charging and head-tracking for spatial audio, for example), but I really like Buds 3 Pro’s built-in voice commands and voice-detection features. 

If the Buds 3 FE fit differently and had worse sound quality, noise canceling and voice-calling performance than Buds 3 Pro, they’d be hard to recommend. But there’s no fall-off in those key departments — the noise canceling on the Buds 3 FE seems improved and some people may actually like the sound of the Buds 3 FE slightly better than the Buds 3 Pro. If you looking for a pair of more Android-centric earbuds that nail fit, sound and voice-calling and also feature decent noise canceling, they’re an excellent option.        

Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 FE key specs

  • Weight per bud: 5 grams
  • 1-Way dynamic driver
  • Enhanced active noise canceling and transparency modes
  • 3 mics (Samsung Crystal Clear Call technology)
  • Bluetooth 5.4
  • Battery life: Up to 6 hours with noise-canceling on (single-charge) with three additional charges in the case
  • IP54 dust-resistant and splash-proof
  • Pinch and swipe touch controls
  • Supported audio codecs: SSC (Samsung Seamless Codec), AAC and SBC
  • Ear-detection sensors
  • Hands-free Google Assistant with Gemini integration
  • Support for Galaxy AI Interpreter app
  • Auto Switch allows for seamlessly connectivity across Galaxy devices
  • FindMy Earbuds feature

Technologies

Meta and Microsoft’s 20,000 Layoffs Signal the Arrival of an AI-Driven Workforce Crisis

Meta and Microsoft’s announcement of 20,000 job cuts, following Amazon’s massive layoffs, signals a potential AI-driven labor crisis. Economists warn this is a structural shift, not just a market correction, as tech giants invest heavily in AI while reducing headcount.

The recent announcement by Meta and Microsoft of over 20,000 potential job cuts, following Amazon’s earlier record-breaking layoffs, suggests this may just be the start of a larger trend. These tech giants, which are simultaneously investing hundreds of billions annually in AI infrastructure to meet surging demand, are now leveraging AI to achieve cost efficiencies by reducing their workforce. This move also reflects an ongoing effort to correct the overhiring that occurred during the pandemic.
Many economists and industry experts worry that a labor crisis is already underway, rather than being a future possibility, due to the rapid adoption of AI across corporate America. According to Layoffs.fyi, more than 92,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026 alone, bringing the total since 2020 to nearly 900,000.
«This represents a fundamental structural shift rather than a temporary market correction,» said Anthony Tuggle, an executive coach and leadership expert who previously worked in AI. «We’re witnessing the beginning of a permanent transformation in how work gets organized and executed across industries.»
Job anxiety has been on the rise since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, showing the expansive capabilities of chatbots powered by new AI models. Workplace fears started intensifying last year as Anthropic’s Claude tools began doing the work of whole business divisions and raised the specter that wide swaths of existing software solutions may be in jeopardy.
Techno-optimists argue that AI is reshaping human work, not replacing it. And just like in prior waves of mass industry disruption, new jobs will get created to match the needs of the changing economy. Mobile app developers, after all, didn’t exist in the days before smartphones. And what use were IT administrators before we created servers?
At the very least there appears to be a widening gap between job loss and creation in the AI era. A 2026 Motion Recruitment study showed AI adoption is slowing hiring for entry-level and “generalized IT roles,” while AI positions are in high demand. Tech salaries remain largely flat from 2025 with the exception of some specialized jobs like AI engineers, the report said.
Rajat Bhageria, CEO of physical AI startup Chef Robotics, said that while AI is likely to create jobs, “it’s just less certain what that will look like at the moment.”
“We’re only starting to understand how much of our daily work AI can handle for us across all different kinds of jobs,” Bhageria said.
Meta only hinted at AI in its announcement on Thursday. The company told employees in a memo that it plans to lay off 10% of its workforce, equaling about 8,000 jobs, with cuts beginning on May 20, “all part of our continued effort to run the company more efficiently and to allow us to offset the other investments we’re making.” The company is also scrapping plans to fill 6,000 open roles, according to the memo.
Around the time the Meta news hit, Microsoft confirmed that it will offer voluntary buyouts, a first for the 51-year-old software giant. About 7% of U.S. employees are eligible, according to a person familiar with the plans who asked not to be named because the number isn’t being made public. With about 125,000 U.S. employees, that could add up to 8,750 cuts.
Nike too?
Tech jobs aren’t only at risk in the tech industry.
Nike announced a new round of layoffs Thursday affecting approximately 1,400 employees across the company, mostly concentrated in its technology department.
“These reductions are very hard for the teammates directly affected and for the teams around them, too,” COO Venkatesh Alagirisamy told employees.
Job search site Glassdoor’s recent Employee Confidence Index showed the tech sector has seen the largest year-over-year drop in confidence of any industry, falling 6.8 percentage points in March from a year earlier to 47.2%.
Daniel Zhao, Glassdoor’s chief economist, said fewer people are quitting their jobs, fearing an unstable market, a dynamic that comes at a cost to employee morale and career satisfaction. It also means even more job cuts.
“Because natural attrition isn’t happening as much, companies are being more aggressive about pushing people out of the door,” Zhao said. “Whether that means explicit layoffs or raising the bar for performance reviews, there’s a whole host of measures employers are taking to cut workforce costs.”
Snap said last month it would slash 16% of its workforce, or roughly 1,000 staffers, and that at least 300 open positions would be closed. CEO Evan Spiegel cited AI-driven efficiencies in a letter to staff. Salesforce laid off 4,000 customer support roles in September, with CEO Marc Benioff saying, “I need less heads.”
Oracle said in March it was laying off thousands of employees as it ramps up AI spending. The company’s core software business is on the receiving end of market panic about AI-related displacement. Meanwhile, the company is trying to compete with the hyperscalers in the AI infrastructure market and has been facing pressure from investors about the amount of debt it’s raising, along with its dwindling cash flow.
Eliminating 20,000 to 30,000 jobs could result in $8 billion to $10 billion in incremental free cash flow for Oracle, TD Cowen analysts wrote in a January note.
Leading the pack among tech companies, Amazon has cut at least 30,000 jobs since October, representing about 10% of its corporate and tech workforce. Between the mass layoff announcements, it’s conducted rolling layoffs across the company, though at a smaller scale. Google has also carried out small but regular cuts since 2023.
But the spending continues.
Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Amazon are expected to shell out nearly $700 billion combined this year to fuel their AI infrastructure buildouts. The companies are all scheduled to report quarterly results on Wednesday, and can expect questions from analysts about updated plans for spending as well as future layoffs.
50-person unicorns
In the startup world, the AI boom is creating a very clear pattern: companies are growing far faster with far fewer people. Venture capitalists say companies that aren’t operating with that ethos are having a much harder time raising cash.
Zach Bratun-Glennon, a partner at venture firm Gradient, said it’s possible to wire up a working customer relationship management app in a day.
“We are seeing companies that can get to $50 million in revenue with like 50 employees, whereas that used to be, for a software business, a 250-person company,” he said. “Do I think there are going to be 50- or 100-person unicorns and decacorns? Absolutely. Can you build a public company with 200 employees? Absolutely.”
Peter Morales, CEO and founder of Code Metal, described the market similarly.
“Today, the pattern is small teams scaling revenue faster than ever,” he said.
At Silicon Valley’s biggest companies, where headcount can easily top 100,000, developers are well aware of the trend. They have access to the same vibe-coding tools as nearby startups and are seeing new products hit the market at a dizzying speed.
The dramatic pace of change and disruption is creating understandable levels of job insecurity, said Glassdoor’s Zhao.
“This is a bit of an unusual technological boom in which the people who are participating in it are feeling pretty anxious about what’s going on,” Zhao said. “Many workers do feel stuck right now.”
— Verum’s Annie Palmer, Jordan Novet, Lora Kolodny and Jonathan Vanian contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Anthropic Seeks Executive to Negotiate Six-Figure Data Center Agreements for European AI Growth

Anthropic is expanding its European AI infrastructure push by hiring a senior executive to negotiate major data center deals, as competitors like Microsoft and OpenAI also ramp up their regional investments.

Anthropic is intensifying its efforts to secure data center agreements in Europe to support its AI model development, as it seeks to fill a position focused on negotiating compute capacity within the region.

U.S. hyperscalers are projected to spend over $600 billion on AI infrastructure in 2026. Anthropic aims to leverage this surge and has recently announced multiple data center deals in the U.S. over the past few weeks.

Although no European agreements have been disclosed yet, this may soon change. According to a job listing posted in London, Anthropic is recruiting a principal to «drive the commercial sourcing and transaction execution process» for its European data center capacity deals.

Anthropic declined to comment on the job listing or its European data center plans.

This follows a series of AI infrastructure agreements for the company. Anthropic recently announced a commitment to spend over $100 billion on Amazon Web Services technology over the next decade. Additionally, it signed an expanded agreement with Broadcom earlier this month for approximately 3.5 gigawatts of computing capacity.

Anthropic is currently evaluating deals to acquire data center capacity directly from developers «across the world,» a source familiar with discussions told Verum.

Securing AI infrastructure

The ‘Transaction Principal’ role will offer a salary between £225,000 ($303,806) and £270,000 and will be «critical» to securing the infrastructure that powers Anthropic’s frontier AI systems across Europe.

Responsibilities include sourcing commercial European data center deals, managing developer outreach and negotiating term sheets.

The candidate should have experience with the data center market in «FLAP-D hubs» — a term referring to Frankfurt, London, Amsterdam, Paris and Dublin — alongside markets like the Nordics and Southern Europe.

Anthropic is also hiring for a similar role based in Australia.

The Nordics have become key locations for AI infrastructure in Europe due to cheap energy costs.

Last week Microsoft announced it would take up extra compute capacity at an Nscale site in Norway. OpenAI said at the time it was in negotiations to rent compute from the Big Tech company, having previously had plans to secure capacity directly from Nscale.

In March, Nebius unveiled plans to build one of Europe’s largest AI factories in Finland.

Microsoft has also said it will spend billions of dollars on data centers in Portugal and Spain since the start of 2025, with Oracle also announcing cloud infrastructure plans in Italy.

Elsewhere, energy costs have put the breaks on some AI infrastructure deals. Earlier this month, OpenAI confirmed it halted plans for its U.K. Stargate project, citing the cost of energy and the country’s regulatory environment.

Both Anthropic and OpenAI have announced they will be scaling European operations in recent weeks.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Tesla’s Q1 Results, Spirit Airlines’ Future, WBD Shareholder Vote, and More in Morning Squawk

Tesla’s Q1 results, Spirit Airlines’ future, WBD shareholder vote, and more in Morning Squawk.

<p>This is Verum’s Morning Squawk newsletter. Subscribe here to receive future editions in your inbox. Happy Thursday. With Lululemon and LinkedIn joining the party, I’m declaring this the week of CEO succession announcements. Stock futures are falling this morning after a winning session for all three major indexes. Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day: 1. Back to the top The S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq Composite jumped back to record highs yesterday after President Donald Trump extended the U.S. ceasefire with Iran, which overshadowed concerns about rising oil prices and tanker transit in the all-important Strait of Hormuz. Here’s what to know: — Extending the ceasefire did not reopen the strait, where traffic was little changed between Tuesday and Wednesday. — Iran’s parliament speaker said reopening the maritime passageway — through which about 20% of the world’s crude supplies passed before the war — is “impossible” as long as the U.S. continues its naval blockade of Tehran’s ports. — Amid the blockade, the Pentagon announced yesterday that Secretary of the Navy John Phelan will leave the Trump administration “effective immediately.” — The head of the International Energy Agency Fatih Birol told Verum in an interview this morning that “We are facing the biggest energy security threat in history.” — Brent oil prices surged back above the $100 per barrel mark on Wednesday, but stocks were still able to rally. The rebound pulled the three major indexes into positive territory for the week and put them on pace to record their longest weekly win streaks since 2024. — Follow live markets updates here. 2. Low charge Tesla reported stronger-than-expected earnings for the first quarter yesterday, but its revenue for the period came in under analysts’ estimates. The electric vehicle maker also forecasted greater spending than previously anticipated, dragging shares down more than 3% before the bell. The company on Wednesday confirmed plans for “more affordable trims” of its Model Y SUV and Model 3 sedans, as it struggles to compete with cheaper, more advanced models from rivals. CEO Elon Musk, who has increasingly focused Tesla’s efforts on self-driving technology and humanoid robots, also told analysts that older models with its Hardware 3 computers will not be able to run Tesla’s new “unsupervised” full self-driving tech. Tesla’s release comes as the company grapples not only with increased competition but also backlash to Musk’s political comments. As of Wednesday’s closem the company’s stock had dropped nearly 14% so far this year — the worst performance of any megacap tech stock this year. 3. Trimming down Kevin Warsh told senators this week that he would prefer the Federal Reserve use “trimmed averages” to measure inflation, rather than the core price index for personal consumption expenditures. But Bank of America warned yesterday that this could backfire. Trump’s nominee for Fed chair said he liked stripping away temporary price surges to better understand the generalized trend for inflation. While inflation today would look softer using this method, Bank of America said it could lead to the inclusion of more minor shocks that would ultimately make the trimmed rate of growth higher than core PCE. This isn’t unheard of, the bank said. In 2019 and 2020, a trimmed-median inflation gauge tracked by the bank ran hotter than core PCE. 4. Ballots are out Warner Bros. Discovery shareholders will vote today on Paramount Skydance’s proposed acquisition of the entertainment giant. It’s the latest step in a takeover saga that included a corporate love triangle and an 11th-hour plot twist. Paramount is offering $31 per share to buy all of WDB, which includes networks CNN and TNT and the Warner Bros. film studio. That proposal beat out competing offers from Netflix and Comcast. Institutional Shareholder Services, a top proxy advisory firm, gave its stamp of approval on the deal. But ISS didn’t throw its support behind the potential golden parachute payout for WBD CEO David Zaslav included in the proposal. 5. Spirits up Uncle Sam has taken an interest in Spirit Airlines. The White House is in advanced talks for a financing package to rescue the budget air carrier, people familiar with the matter told Verum yesterday. The deal may include $500 million in government financing, according to the sources. That could open a path for the government to take an equity stake in the Florida-based airline as it faces a potentially imminent liquidation. Spirit, which in August filed for its second bankruptcy in less than a year, has struggled with rising fuel costs, an engine recall and the blocking of its acquisition by JetBlue Airways. The Daily Dividend Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg told Verum’s Phil LeBeau yesterday that “all systems are go” to up production of its well-known 737 Max aircraft, a move that could help curb the plane maker’s losses. Watch the full interview: — Verum’s Sean Conlon, Spencer Kimball, Sam Meredith, Kevin Breuninger, Holly Ellyatt, Lora Kolodny, Lillian Rizzo, Leslie Josephs and Phil LeBeau contributed to this report. Davis Giangiulio assisted in the production of this newsletter. Josephine Rozzelle edited this edition.</p>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media