Technologies

10 Features That Would Make Me Buy the Apple Watch Series 11

The next Apple Watch is coming soon! These are ways for Apple to make it shine and keep up with the competition.

With WatchOS 26 now in public beta, we’re getting a telling preview of what’s coming to Apple Watches this fall. But for those of us eyeing the next model (likely the Apple Watch Series 11, and possibly an Ultra or SE), the real question is: How will Apple one-up itself from last year’s Series 10? Better yet, how will it compete with newer flagships vying for your wrist this year?

Some of these requests are grounded in rumors, while others are mere wishful thinking. Here’s everything I hope Apple brings to its next smartwatch.

This wishlist is focused on the Series 11, because it’s the flagship model and the one that usually sets the tone for where the platform is headed next.

1. Smarter Siri

After using Gemini AI on the Galaxy Watch 8, it’s painfully clear just how far Siri is lagging. Gemini isn’t just more conversational; it’s actually useful on the wrist. It handles complex prompts in one go, summarizes aloud and spares you from dead-end results or clunky app handoffs. On a smartwatch, where time and screen space are limited, that makes a huge difference.

If Apple wants to compete, it needs to bring more «intelligence» to the Apple Watch. Right now, the few AI features that are available on the watch in the beta of WatchOS 26 (live translations in text messages and Workout Buddy) require an Apple Intelligence-enabled iPhone to do the heavy lifting. Siri needs a serious upgrade across the board, along with more standalone processing power on the watch.

2. More powerful processor

This brings us to the chip that runs everything. The Ultra 2 and Series 10 already made strides by enabling on-device Siri for tasks like starting or stopping workouts without needing a phone nearby.

For the smarter Siri Apple envisions, the Series 11 will need more on-watch processing. The rumored S11 chip will have to bring real gains in speed and efficiency to support features like Workout Buddy directly on the watch, without leaning on the iPhone.

3. Two-day battery life

For me, battery life is one of the biggest deterrents to using the Apple Watch to its full potential. I get about 26 hours on the smaller Series 10 — barely enough to make it through a full day and night — which means constantly choosing between sleep tracking and starting my day with a full charge.

Most days, because I’m rushing out the door, I pick a full day over sleep tracking. That creates gaps in my Vitals app, throwing off the outlier alerts that could help flag onset illness, or the retroactive ovulation predictions that require overnight temperature tracking. And when I do manage a quick top-up, I often run out of juice midday (usually before my workout) so I don’t get the satisfaction of closing my rings.

The Ultra line has already shown what’s possible, pushing up to two days of battery life at full throttle (or 72 hours in low power mode). And while this may be far-fetched, I wish the regular Series would catch up. Apple hasn’t mentioned any efficiency gains in WatchOS 26, and so far, battery life rumors for the Series 11 are scarce. But if Apple can get us to a reliable 48 hours (even in low power mode), it would eliminate a major pain point for anyone serious about sleep tracking.

4. A surprise health/fitness metric

Blood pressure monitoring might be the most requested health feature I see (based on my very unscientific comment section data). Apple is reportedly testing it, but it may still be a year or more away. Noninvasive glucose tracking is another wishlist item but that’s even further out.

Still, there’s room for a novel feature that hasn’t leaked yet. Samsung’s Antioxidant Index was a pleasant surprise: a first-of-its-kind skin analysis that detects carotenoids. The feature hasn’t received FDA approval so it’s mostly categorized as a «wellness» tool and it’s questionable whether it will prove helpful long-term. But it sets the watch apart — and honestly, it was just fun to be surprised for once. It’s also been a neat little add-on that’s helped me stay more mindful of what I eat and how I manage stress by giving me something measurable to work on.

5. Clearer signals when you’re getting sick

The Apple Watch Vitals app already alerts you when multiple metrics are off but it doesn’t connect the dots for you. I’d love to see a feature like the Oura Ring’s Symptom Radar, which interprets those shifts and gently nudges you to take it easy, letting you pause your activity goals until your numbers are back to normal.

Apple does let you pause activity rings manually but when you’re dazed and sniffling, you’re probably not thinking about toggling settings. It should do that heavy lifting for you.

6. Circular design or rotating

This is veering deep into the realm of deranged wishful thinking but if Apple ever released a circular version of the Apple Watch — or better yet, added a rotating bezel like Samsung’s Classic series — I would be first in line. The rectangular design is iconic, but circular watches will always hold a special aesthetic place in my heart. And the beze l… that tactile cherry on top of a very elegant, albeit far-fetched, sundae.

7. UV exposure alerts

As someone who loves being outdoors, I never even considered I’d have issues getting enough Vitamin D in my day until I wore the Ultrahuman smart ring and realized my marathon office sessions were taking their toll. And I imagine this rings true for a lot of us. The ring would alert me when I hadn’t met my daily UV minimum — a surprisingly helpful nudge that made me rethink how much time I spend indoors.

The Apple Watch does have a UV Index complication option on some of its watchfaces but it’s passive and easy to ignore. I’d love proactive alerts that track your cumulative exposure and warn you when you’ve had too much — or not enough.

8. Dual frequency GPS, standard

The Ultra already includes precision dual-frequency GPS, but the regular Series 10 still doesn’t. Apple should make this standard across the board, just like Samsung did with its Galaxy Watch 8 lineup. It’s a feature you don’t realize you’re missing until you experience it, as it significantly improves location accuracy, especially in dense urban areas.

9. More app functionality

Now we’re crossing into software wishlist territory but I’d love to see full-fledged apps like WhatsApp on the watch with full call and message capabilities. The Notes app is finally arriving in WatchOS 26 (better late than never) and it’s a good reminder that there’s still a lot of untapped potential in bringing more everyday phone tools to the wrist.

10. More gesture customization

Apple introduced the double-tap gesture in 2023 and WatchOS 26 adds a flick gesture for quick controls. But gestures still feel underused (at least by this reviewer), mainly because you can’t customize them much beyond the limited list that Apple provides.

The default actions like silencing alarms or calls are fine but I’d love to assign gestures to things like pinging my phone or launching specific apps. Also, a small on-screen reminder flagging gesture shortcuts could go a long way in retraining that muscle memory.

Bottom line

Apple doesn’t need to reinvent the wheel with the Series 11 (although a rotating bezel would be nice) but with Gemini AI pushing Android forward, it does need to make some moves. Smarter Siri, more contextual health insights and a battery that can actually keep up … that’s the Apple Watch I’m waiting for.

Technologies

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Tuesday, Oct. 21

Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for Oct. 21.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.

Today’s Mini Crossword features a lot of one certain letter. Need help? Read on. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.

Mini across clues and answers

1A clue: Bone that can be «dropped»
Answer: JAW

4A clue: Late scientist Goodall
Answer: JANE

5A clue: Make critical assumptions about
Answer: JUDGE

6A clue: Best by a little
Answer: ONEUP

7A clue: Mercury, Jupiter, Saturn, etc.
Answer: GODS

Mini down clues and answers

1D clue: Just kind of over it
Answer: JADED

2D clue: Beef cattle breed
Answer: ANGUS

3D clue: Shed tears
Answer: WEEP

4D clue: 2007 comedy-drama starring Elliot Page and Michael Cera
Answer: JUNO

5D clue: Refresh, as one’s memory
Answer: JOG

Technologies

Wikipedia Says It’s Losing Traffic Due to AI Summaries, Social Media Videos

The popular online encyclopedia saw an 8% drop in pageviews over the last few months.

Wikipedia has seen a decline in users this year due to artificial intelligence summaries in search engine results and the growing popularity of social media, according to a blog post Friday from Marshall Miller of the Wikimedia Foundation, the organization that oversees the free online encyclopedia.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

In the post, Miller describes an 8% drop in human pageviews over the last few months compared with the numbers Wikipedia saw in the same months in 2024.

«We believe that these declines reflect the impact of generative AI and social media on how people seek information, especially with search engines providing answers directly to searchers, often based on Wikipedia content,» Miller wrote.

Blame the bots

AI-generated summaries that pop up on search engines like Bing and Google often use bots called web crawlers to gather much of the information that users read at the top of the search results.

Websites do their best to restrict how these bots handle their data, but web crawlers have become pretty skilled at going undetected.

«Many bots that scrape websites like ours are continually getting more sophisticated and trying to appear human,» Miller wrote.

After reclassifying Wikipedia traffic data from earlier this year, Miller says the site «found that much of the unusually high traffic for the period of May and June was coming from bots built to evade detection.»

The Wikipedia blog post also noted that younger generations are turning to social-video platforms for their information rather than the open web and such sites as Wikipedia.

When people search with AI, they’re less likely to click through

There is now promising research on the impact of generative AI on the internet, especially concerning online publishers with business models that rely on users visiting their webpages.

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

In July, Pew Research examined browsing data from 900 US adults and found that the AI-generated summaries at the top of Google’s search results affected web traffic. When the summary appeared in a search, users were less likely to click on links compared to when the search results didn’t include the summaries.

Google search is especially important, because Google.com is the world’s most visited website — it’s how most of us find what we’re looking for on the internet.

«LLMs, AI chatbots, search engines and social platforms that use Wikipedia content must encourage more visitors to Wikipedia, so that the free knowledge that so many people and platforms depend on can continue to flow sustainably,» Miller wrote. «With fewer visits to Wikipedia, fewer volunteers may grow and enrich the content, and fewer individual donors may support this work.»

Last year, CNET published an extensive report on how changes in Google’s search algorithm decimated web traffic for online publishers.

Technologies

OpenAI Says It’s Working With Actors to Crack Down on Celebrity Deepfakes in Sora

Bryan Cranston alerted SAG-AFTRA, the actors union, when he saw AI-generated videos of himself made with the AI video app.

OpenAI said Monday it would do more to stop users of its AI video generation app Sora from creating clips with the likenesses of actors and other celebrities after actor Bryan Cranston and the union representing film and TV actors raised concerns that deepfake videos were being made without the performers’ consent.

Actor Bryan Cranston, the Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) and several talent agencies said they struck a deal with the ChatGPT maker over the use of celebrities’ likenesses in Sora. The joint statement highlights the intense conflict between AI companies and rights holders like celebrities’ estates, movie studios and talent agencies — and how generative AI tech continues to erode reality for all of us.

Sora, a new sister app to ChatGPT, lets users create and share AI-generated videos. It launched to much fanfare three weeks ago, with AI enthusiasts searching for invite codes. But Sora is unique among AI video generators and social media apps; it lets you use other people’s recorded likenesses to place them in nearly any AI video. It has been, at best, weird and funny, and at worst, a never-ending scroll of deepfakes that are nearly indistinguishable from reality.

Cranston noticed his likeness was being used by Sora users when the app launched, and the Breaking Bad actor alerted his union. The new agreement with the actors’ union and talent agencies reiterates that celebrities will have to opt in to having their likenesses available to be placed into AI-generated video. OpenAI said in the statement that it has «strengthened the guardrails around replication of voice and likeness» and «expressed regret for these unintentional generations.»

OpenAI does have guardrails in place to prevent the creation of videos of well-known people: It rejected my prompt asking for a video of Taylor Swift on stage, for example. But these guardrails aren’t perfect, as we’ve saw last week with a growing trend of people creating videos featuring Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. They ranged from weird deepfakes of the civil rights leader rapping and wrestling in the WWE to overtly racist content.

Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.

The flood of «disrespectful depictions,» as OpenAI called them in a statement on Friday, is part of why the company paused the ability to create videos featuring King.

Statement from OpenAI and King Estate, Inc.
The Estate of Martin Luther King, Jr., Inc. (King, Inc.) and OpenAI have worked together to address how Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.’s likeness is represented in Sora generations. Some users generated disrespectful depictions of Dr.…

— OpenAI Newsroom (@OpenAINewsroom) October 17, 2025

Bernice A. King, his daughter, last week publicly asked people to stop sending her AI-generated videos of her father. She was echoing comedian Robin Williams’ daughter, Zelda, who called these sorts of AI videos «gross.»

I concur concerning my father.
Please stop. #RobinWilliams #MLK #AI https://t.co/SImVIP30iN

— Be A King (@BerniceKing) October 7, 2025

OpenAI said it «believes public figures and their families should ultimately have control over how their likeness is used» and that «authorized representatives» of public figures and their estates can request that their likeness not be included in Sora. In this case, King’s estate is the entity responsible for choosing how his likeness is used.

This isn’t the first time OpenAI has leaned on others to make those calls. Before Sora’s launch, the company reportedly told a number of Hollywood-adjacent talent agencies that they would have to opt out of having their intellectual property included in Sora. But that initial approach didn’t square with decades of copyright law — usually, companies need to license protected content before using it — and OpenAI reversed its stance a few days later. It’s one example of how AI companies and creators are clashing over copyright, including through high-profile lawsuits.

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)