Technologies
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Review: It’s All About the Cover Screen
Samsung’s flip phone finally gets a bigger cover screen, making that $1,000 price easier to swallow.
A month ago, I was convinced that Motorola’s Razr Plus was the best flip phone money could buy. But after two weeks using the new Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5, which also starts at $1,000 (£1,049, AU$1,649), I changed my mind.
Samsung’s new flip phone, which goes on sale Friday, now has a bigger cover screen that nearly occupies the entire front of the device when closed. That might not sound like a big deal, but it goes a long way in making the Z Flip more useful without having to open it.
Foldable phones have previously felt like an answer to a nonexistent problem. That still may be true, but having the option to send messages, snap photos and respond to notifications on a device that fits in the palm of my hand adds a degree of convenience that’s hard to understand unless you’ve tried it.
Motorola’s new Razr Plus raised the bar for what a flip phone should be in 2023, and it deserves credit for that. But there are a few factors that make the Z Flip 5 the superior choice for most shoppers interested in a flip phone. The design and build quality feel sturdier, the software is more polished and the phone gets an additional year of Android version support compared to what Motorola offers.

That doesn’t mean Samsung gets everything right. At $1,000, the Z Flip 5 still demands a high price for a phone that doesn’t have a telephoto camera. Like previous Z Flips, you’re paying for the convenience of having a device that can fit in your pocket more easily. While portability is still the driving factor behind the Z Flip’s appeal, the Flip 5 represents Samsung’s attempt at giving users another reason to consider giving foldables a chance. And it’s off to a great start.
Galaxy Z Flip 5’s smaller screen gets a big upgrade

The Galaxy Z Flip 5’s larger new front screen, which Samsung calls the Flex Window, is hard to miss. It measures 3.4 inches, making it much bigger than the miniscule 1.9-inch screen on the front of the Galaxy Z Flip 4, but smaller than the Razr Plus. 3.6-inch cover display.
That more spacious front screen means there’s a lot more I was able to do with the Z Flip 5 closed. As I wrote in my first impressions story, the small screen’s interface is primarily designed to run widgets rather than full apps. Widgets provide the type of information you’d expect to see on a small screen, such as the weather, your calendar, alarms and pinned apps and contacts.
From the main lock screen, I can swipe from right to left to cycle through various widgets, while swiping from left to right will show my notifications. There’s a small dot located on the left side of the screen to indicate whether you have any unchecked notifications, which feels very smartwatch-esque.

The Z Flip 5 also has a clever pinching gesture for showing thumbnails of all my widgets on screen at once, which can be helpful for quickly jumping to a specific screen without swiping multiple times. It feels very Apple-like, and it’s a good example of how Samsung is thinking about navigation and user interface design differently on a display this small.
But Samsung only allows certain apps on the cover screen natively, whereas almost every app I’ve used on the Razr Plus was supported on its outer display without much extra fuss. On the Z Flip 5, I had to install the Good Lock app from the Galaxy Store to gain access to a broader selection of apps on the cover screen.
Still, the Z Flip 5 natively supports many of the apps that make sense for the cover screen, such as Google Maps, the camera app, and messaging apps like WhatsApp. Even though Spotify doesn’t show up as a compatible app, I was able to access album art and playback controls from the Z Flip 5’s front screen when I played music with the phone open.
I spent most of my time using the Galaxy Z Flip 5 while vacationing in South Korea, and there were a few apps that would have been very useful on the front display while traveling around Seoul. Google Translate is a big one that comes to mind. Being able to quickly pull up the app from the cover screen could have made some of my interactions go a bit smoother. Quickly browsing through news headlines or social media feeds with the device closed while riding the Seoul Metro also would have been nice considering I was usually using one hand to grip the subway handles.

It wasn’t until I returned from my trip that I used the Good Lock app to bring apps like Google, Google Translate and Slack to the cover screen. Even though these apps technically aren’t optimized for the cover screen, they ran surprisingly well. My only gripe is that they appear on a separate widget, meaning I have to swipe between two separate widgets on the cover screen to access my apps.
It’s also worth mentioning that apps on the Z Flip 5’s main screen also don’t seamlessly transition to the cover screen when closing the phone as they do on the Razr Plus. Instead, it only works the other way around, with apps moving from the cover screen to the main screen after opening the device.
Regardless, Samsung’s execution of the Flex Window is a promising start. It’s clean and intuitive, and there’s a lot of potential for Samsung to expand its capabilities.
Galaxy Z Flip 5 gets a new hinge

Samsung’s new foldable phone also has an upgraded hinge that allows the device to close completely with no gap when shut. This is another area where Samsung is playing catch-up; Motorola and Google both launched foldable phones in June that have no gap when closed.
Samsung also says the new hinge should make the Z Flip 5 more durable since it has fewer moving parts, and the hinge’s structure should also improve shock absorption. There’s still a visible crease running across the phone’s 6.7-inch main display, but it feels a slightly flatter to the touch compared to the Z Flip 4.
Motorola’s Razr Plus looks thinner than the Z Flip 5, but Samsung’s phone has a sturdier feel. I’ve only used the Razr Plus for a couple of weeks, but I already notice that it doesn’t always unfold completely straight. I haven’t used the Z Flip 5 for very long yet, so it’s impossible to know how it will hold up over time.
That also raises a larger question about long-term durability for foldable phones. Although foldable phone designs have improved over the last four years, it’s worth remembering that these devices come with a higher risk of damage compared to traditional smartphones. They’re also not dust-resistant like standard, non-folding devices. Both the Z Flip 5 and Z Flip 4 have an IPX8 ingress protection rating, meaning they’re water-resistant but not dust-resistant.
Galaxy Z Flip 5’s camera is slightly better than the Z Flip 4

It’s clear that Samsung focused most of its resources on the Z Flip 5’s cover screen and hinge. The Galaxy Z Flip 5’s camera is largely the same as last year’s model, except it has a new coating that should reduce lens flare. That means the Z Flip 5 has 12-megapixel wide and ultrawide cameras, and a 10-megapixel selfie camera.
Instead of upgrading the camera sensor, Samsung is relying on the device’s new Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip to do the heavy lifting when it comes to improving image quality. It’s somewhat disappointing not to see an upgrade in camera hardware considering Samsung has been positioning the Z Flip as being ideal for snapping photos thanks to its flexibility. But photos taken on the Z Flip 5 are sharp and colorful enough to satisfy most people.
And you can certainly tell the difference when comparing photos alongside those taken on the Z Flip 4. I observed that colors look bolder and details are crisper in photos taken with the Z Flip 5 versus the Z Flip 4.
When it comes to the Razr Plus and Galaxy Z Flip 5, results differ depending on the situation. There were times when the Razr’s photos felt drab and lacking in color compared to the Z Flip 5’s.
Take a look at the photos below to see how the Z Flip 5’s camera compares to the Razr’s and Z Flip 4’s below. The differences may be hard to spot, but they’re more prominent when viewing these photos at their full size on a laptop-sized screen.
Galaxy Z Flip 5

Galaxy Z Flip 4

Motorola Razr Plus

Galaxy Z Flip 5

Galaxy Z Flip 4

Motorola Razr Plus

Galaxy Z Flip 5

Galaxy Z Flip 4

Motorola Razr Plus

But there were also times when Motorola’s phone succeeded in certain areas over Samsung’s. In the photo below of a delicious boiling pan of tteokbokki, a Korean street food staple that usually consists of soft chewy rice cakes and other ingredients soaked in red pepper sauce, Samsung did a better job at capturing the bubbling sauce’s orange color more accurately. But Motorola’s photo is noticeably sharper.
Galaxy Z Flip 5

Motorola Razr Plus

As was the case with previous generations of the Z Flip, you shouldn’t expect to get the same top-notch camera quality you’d find on a phone like the Galaxy S23 Ultra or Google Pixel 7 Pro. But I’m impressed with the improvements I’ve seen so far. While the Z Flip 5 doesn’t support the same zoom range or the offer option to capture super high-resolution photos like S23 Ultra, its cameras are plenty capable of documenting food and travel for Instagram. And that’s exactly what I did while testing it in Seoul.
Check out the gallery below to see the photos I took all over the city, from cultural landmarks like Gyeongbokgung Palace, incredible views from the base of Namsan Seoul Tower and nightlife hotspots like Hongdae. And of course, I’ve included photos of the delicious food I ate while in Seoul, too.
On a phone like the Z Flip 5, it’s not just about image quality. The device’s foldable design also lets you capture photos in different ways. I can, for example, open the phone halfway and rest it on a surface to capture a photo hands-free.
The cover screen also allows you to capture selfies with the main rear cameras rather than the lower resolution internal selfie camera. The front screen can show previews of photos being captured with the main cameras before hitting the shutter button, allowing the subject to see a live preview. However, this requires pressing a specific button within Samsung’s camera app while shooting, whereas Motorola’s phone does this automatically. And I liked having a much larger viewfinder for capturing selfies on the Z Flip 5 compared to the Z Flip 4.
Galaxy Z Flip 5: Main 12MP camera

Galaxy Z Flip 5: Inner 10MP camera

Galaxy Z Flip 5 software, performance and battery life

A foldable design doesn’t mean much without useful software features. Samsung’s answer to this is Flex Mode, which shifts apps to the top portion of the display when the device is positioned half open like a laptop.
There isn’t much new with Flex Mode this year, but it’s still more functional than Motorola’s equivalent feature for the Razr Plus, which only worked in the camera app for me.
Performance on the Galaxy Z Flip 5 is what’s expected from a phone at this price. Apps launch quickly, I didn’t notice any lag or stuttering, and supported apps seamlessly switch from the cover screen to the main display.
I also ran benchmark tests meant to evaluate general computing performance and graphics power. Geekbench 6, the general computing test, assesses how the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip inside the Z Flip 5 performs at both the single-core and multicore level. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme tests graphics by simulating gaming environments.
Take a look at the chart below to see how the Galaxy Z Flip 5 compares against last year’s Z Flip 4 and the Motorola Razr Plus in these tests.
Galaxy Z Flip 5 Performance Comparison
- Geekbench 6 (Single Core)
- Geekbench 6 (Multicore)
- 3DMark Wild Life
Battery life on the Z Flip 5 is long enough to make it through a busy day of wandering around Seoul snapping photos, looking up directions and discovering nearby points of interest. I typically took my phone off its charger in the late morning, between 9:30 and 10:30 a.m., and still had 25 to 30% of my battery left between midnight and 1:30 a.m.
During CNET’s 45-minute battery endurance test, which involves performing everyday tasks like streaming YouTube, making a video call, playing games and scrolling through social media, the Z Flip 5’s battery dropped from 100% to 90%. That’s better than last year’s Z Flip 4 and about on par with the Galaxy S23. The Galaxy Z Flip 5 also performed about the same as the Galaxy S23 in a three-hour battery test that involved continuously streaming YouTube with the brightness cranked to the max. The Z Flip 5 had 80% of its battery left after three hours of streaming, whereas the S23 had 81%.
These improvements are largely thanks to the Z Flip 5’s new processor. It has the same battery capacity as last year’s Z Flip 4 but there’s more local storage at the base level.
The $1,000 Galaxy Z Flip 5 comes with 256GB of storage, meaning you get double the space for same starting price as its predecessor.
Galaxy Z Flip 5 shows foldables are improving

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 further proves that phone-makers are getting closer to answering the question of why foldable phones are useful in the first place. The new cover screen goes a long way in reaching that goal.
As I wrote when reviewing the Motorola Razr Plus, the bigger external display shows that flip phones are about more than just portability. Having a device that’s easy to navigate with one hand and can also unfold to a full-sized phone makes the Z Flip 5 and other similar phones more versatile than the phones most people carry today. Companies like Samsung and Motorola are starting to realize that the so-called “killer app” for foldables may come down to the benefits of having two screens that work together, rather than focusing primarily on how the main screen behaves when folded and unfolded.
Galaxy Z Flip 5 Specs Compared
| Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 | Motorola Razr Plus | Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate, brightness | Cover: 3.4-inch AMOLED (728 x 720 pixels); internal: 6.7-inch AMOLED (2,640 x 1,080 pixels), 1-120Hz | Cover: 3.6-inch OLED (1,066 x 1,056 pixels); internal: 6.9-inch (2,640 pixels x 1,080) | Cover: 1.9-inch AMOLED (512 x 260 pixels); internal: 6.7-inch (2,640 x 1,080 pixels) |
| Pixel density | Cover: 306 ppi, Internal: 425 ppi | Cover: 413 ppi, internal: 413ppi | Cover: 302 ppi, internal: 425 ppi |
| Dimensions (inches) | Open: 6.5 x 2.83 x 0.27 in; closed: 3.35 x 2.83 x 0.59 in | Open: 2.91 x 6.73 x 0.28 in; closed: 2.91 x 3.48 x 0.59 in | Open: 2.83 x 3.3 x 0.67 in; closed: 2.83 x 6.5 x 0.27 in; hinge: 0.59 in (sagging) |
| Dimensions (millimeters) | Open: 71.88 x 165.1 x 6.89 mm; closed: 71.88 x 85.09 x 14.99 mm | Open: 73.95 x 170.83 x 6.99 mm; closed: 73.95 x 88.42 x 15.1 mm | Open: 71.9 x 165.2 x 6.9 mm; closed: 71.9 x 84.9 x 17.1 mm; hinge: 15.9 mm (sagging); |
| Weight (grams, ounces) | 187 g (6.6 oz) | 189 g (6.64 oz) | 187 g (6.59 oz) |
| Mobile software (at launch) | Android 13 | Android 13 | Android 12 |
| Camera | 12-megapixel (main), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) | 12-megapixel (main), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) | 12-megapixel (main), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) |
| Front-facing camera | 10-megapixel | 32-megapixel | 10-megapixel |
| Video capture | 4K | 4K | 4K |
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 | Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 |
| RAM/storage | 8GB + 256GB/512GB | 8GB + 256GB | 8GB+ 128GB/256GB/512GB |
| Expandable storage | None | None | None |
| Battery | 3,700 mAh (dual-battery) | 3,800 mAh | 3,700 mAh |
| Fingerprint sensor | Side | Side | Side |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C |
| Headphone jack | None | None | None |
| Special features | 5G-enabled, IPX8 water resistance, 25W wired charging, wireless charging, wireless power share, dual SIM | IP52, 5G-enabled, foldable display, 30W wired charging, wireless charging | IPX8, 5G enabled, foldable display, wireless charging, 25W fast charging |
| US price off-contract | $1,000 | $1,000 | $1,000 |
| UK price | £1,049 | Converts to £780 | £1,000 |
| Australia price | AU$1,649 | Converts to AU$1,475 | AU$1,499 |
Technologies
LA Clippers owner Steve Ballmer apologizes over team sanctions
Ballmer said that the team is complying with the penalties, has paid the fines, and is “moving forward.”
Los Angeles Clippers owner Steve Ballmer has apologized almost two weeks after a broad array of sanctions was slapped on the team by the National Basketball Association.
In a statement posted on X, Ballmer called this a “difficult time” and apologized to the team’s fans, employees, and “my fellow NBA team owners for the distraction and distress this matter has caused.”
Earlier this month, the Clippers were hit with sanctions for violating the league’s salary cap circumvention rules related to star player Kawhi Leonard and four companies that did business with the team.
The team will also forfeit five first-round draft picks, with one each year beginning in 2029, as well as pay a fine of $30 million, the largest in NBA history.
Ballmer said that the team is complying with the penalties, has paid the fines and is “moving forward.”
He added, however, that “while there are still disagreements concerning the findings in the report, this is not where I want to focus. Team owners should support, not distract.”
When the penalties were disclosed, the Clippers had “vehemently” rejected the NBA’s findings. The team said it intended to challenge the report, adding that the report’s findings “are the result of a heavily biased investigation seeking to justify a predetermined narrative rather than facts and evidence.”
The NBA said Ballmer “knowingly” sought to help Leonard obtain off-court income opportunities worth millions of dollars, among other violations.
Leonard, on his part, said that he had “no knowledge of any intent on anyone’s part to circumvent the salary cap.”
Ballmer went on to say that the Clippers will continue to build the team and invest in their community, adding he is “certain that we will compete at the highest level and be an organization our fans can be proud of.”
— CNBC’s Dan Mangan contributed to this report.
Technologies
What Amodei’s AI slowdown could mean for Anthropic’s imminent IPO
As Anthropic meets with prospective investors ahead of its potentially historic market debut, CEO Dario Amodei is pushing for a slowdown in AI.
Anthropic’s road to an IPO just got a lot bumpier.
While the Claude creator meets with prospective investors ahead of its potentially historic debut, co-founder and CEO Dario Amodei is pushing a concept that would seem to contradict those ambitious efforts: a slowdown.
Anthropic, valued at $965 billion earlier this year, confidentially filed its IPO prospectus in June, and has been widely expected to list its shares as soon as next month. Meanwhile, concerns about the power of advanced AI models has been intensifying for weeks, spilling into the mainstream as more researchers warn of potential threats of human extinction.
With that backdrop, Amodei wrote an essay over the weekend urging the AI industry to slow the pace of model development, proposing a three-step plan to temper how quickly model capabilities improve without “sacrificing commercial advantage or the United States’ lead in AI.”
It’s the latest challenge facing public market investors who are trying to determine what they’re willing to pay for a piece of a five-year-old company that’s already among the most valuable in the world and could seek a $2 trillion valuation in its IPO. Though Anthropic may have to accept a hit to revenue growth, some experts say an intentional slowdown could help Anthropic frame itself as a responsible actor, avoid future liability and address the public backlash towards AI that’s been brewing across the country.
“I don’t know that investors are necessarily going to see it as a negative,” Gil Luria, an equity analyst at D.A. Davidson, said in an interview. “Unless the companies are genuine and say, ‘OK, we’re not going to IPO, we’re not going to use any more compute, we’re not going to train any more models.’ That’s not what they’re saying.”
Anthropic has picked the Nasdaq as the exchange for its potential IPO, CNBC confirmed after Business Insider first reported the selection.
Amodei on Saturday proposed that model companies open up to third-party evaluators, frontier companies establish “common safety standards,” and that democratic countries coordinate with authoritarian governments “to the extent this is possible.”
His essay came after several industry researchers issued stern warnings last week about the technology’s growing potential to cause catastrophic harms.
President Donald Trump slammed Amodei in a post on Truth Social on Monday, writing that the only “control or ’guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!”
“The Trump Administration has stopped AI ‘people’ from doing bad, or potentially bad, ‘things,” like Dario (Anthropic!), who is now pretending to be a ‘perfect little angel’ – and we will continue to do so!,” Trump wrote. “We already have tremendous CRIMINAL and REGULATORY power over these companies!”
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman expressed support for Amodei’s proposal, as did Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX, which owns Grok creator xAI. SpaceX went public in June in the biggest IPO on record and is now valued at $2 trillion. OpenAI has confidentially filed its IPO prospectus, but has been under fire in recent months after its models escaped containment, accessed the open internet and breached open-source developer platform Hugging Face.
“Right now would be an ill-advised moment to go public,” Altman said in an interview with Fortune, reiterating that OpenAI won’t aim for an IPO until next year. Finance chief Sarah Friar told employees during an all-hands meeting last month that the AI lab “will be a public company in 2027.”
Lise Buyer, partner at IPO advisory firm Class V Group, said she doesn’t see the recent “we might obliterate you all” fears having an impact on IPO timing, but it could alter valuations, she said.
“The bet here is on the long term — now with tempering thoughts about control of the technology,” Buyer said in an email. “The dramatic growth and possibilities of these companies, now more publicly coupled with the potential very serious concerns and risks, will likely persist whether the IPO happens in Q4 or next year or whenever.”
Anthropic and OpenAI declined to comment for this story.
′Don’t see why growth would slow’
Anthropic hit $65 billion in annualized revenue in July, about a sevenfold increase from the prior year, as CNBC previously reported. The company has told some shareholders that it will generate an operating profit for a second straight quarter in the current period, according to two sources familiar who asked not to be named because the details are confidential. The Financial Times earlier reported the operating profit on Sunday.
Matt Murphy, a partner at Menlo Ventures and an Anthropic investor, called the growth rate “off the charts,” and said a public listing would bring more transparency around the business.
“Don’t see why growth would slow or any other reason to wait,” Murphy told CNBC.
That transparency could also help improve what has been dismal public sentiment around the technology.
More than half of Americans say they’re more concerned than excited about the growing use of AI in daily life, up from 37% in 2021, according to a recent report from the Pew Research Center. And confidence in AI executives is even worse, according to a CNBC Generation Lab survey of 18- to 34-year-olds. More than 75% of respondents said they don’t trust Amodei to act responsibly, while around 70% expressed those views about Altman.
“One could argue that sooner is better than later for a public offering as the accountability that comes with being a public company might be of a great interest to many,” Class V Group’s Buyer said.
Altimeter Capital CEO Brad Gerstner, whose firm is an investor in Anthropic and OpenAI, said in a post on X on Saturday that bringing more “transparency, scrutiny, accountability” and participation to AI companies is “crucial.” He said Anthropic will likely forge ahead with its IPO.
“The market knows how to price risk – see SpaceX,” Gerstner wrote. “There is huge appetite to invest in the AI leaders.”
Gerstner’s post came a day after he blasted public remarks from industry researchers, calling them “hyperbolic scare tactics” that are “hiding behind a political agenda,” in an interview with CNBC.
There are plenty of skeptics when it comes to Amodei’s latest positioning. One argument is that Anthropic benefits from stricter standards because it currently has the most advanced models and makes money from selling services, like Claude Code, that are powered by those models.
“That could actually favor Anthropic and OpenAI if smaller competitors cannot afford the rigorous safety, evaluation and security investments required for frontier-level models,” Arun Chandrasekaran, an analyst at Gartner, told CNBC in an email.
D.A. Davidson’s Luria agrees and said he thinks Anthropic and OpenAI are engaging in “monopolistic behavior.” OpenAI has reportedly asked members of Congress for guidance about whether a coordinated, industrywide slowdown would violate antitrust law, according to Wired.
“I’m highly suspicious of what Anthropic and OpenAI are doing,” Luria said. “It feels more and more like a ladder pull.”
What about the rest of tech?
Tech investors have other reasons to worry about the pace of development at OpenAI and Anthropic, because those companies are responsible for an outsized amount of AI infrastructure spending.
Anthropic has inked a flurry of multibillion-dollar compute deals this year, including with Nscale, Advanced Micro Devices, SpaceX, and Google. OpenAI told investors in February that it’s targeting roughly $600 billion in total compute spend by 2030. Both companies are heavy users of Nvidia’s graphics processing units.
“I would want to understand how the mix shifts between frontier training, post-training and inference as safety controls are integrated,” said Lo Toney, managing partner at Plexo Capital, and an Anthropic investor.
PitchBook analyst Harrison Rolfes is more concerned about reduced growth. He said valuations for model companies likely deserve a discount now, largely because it’s hard for investors to trust that they can safely commercialize their technology.
“Is the first thing that you want to do as a public company go handle a bunch of security issues and vulnerability issues?” Rolfes said. “No, you probably want to focus on expanding into all the markets that you promised all your investors.”
Gene Munster, managing partner at Deepwater Asset Management, told CNBC that any sort of perceived slowdown will be a negative because the market is “underwriting exponential uninterrupted improvements to the models.”
Still, Munster predicted that “nothing will change and the AI leapfrog game will continue.”
“AI’s long-term opportunity is too big for them to slow down,” Munster said. “I believe the comments were motivated to reduce the regulatory pressure.”
WATCH: Seems like Anthropic will beat OpenAI to IPO, says FirstMark’s Rick Heitzmann
Technologies
Iran says it destroyed U.S. advanced drone over Hormuz as Middle East conflict intensifies
Iran said it downed an advanced American drone over the Strait of Hormuz, as Tehran and Washington trade warnings and strikes with no sign of de-escalation.
Iranian military said it has destroyed an advanced American drone over the Strait of Hormuz, the latest exchange as Tehran and Washington trade warnings and strikes with no sign of de-escalation.
The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps said Monday that its “new advanced aerospace defence system” intercepted and destroyed an advanced MQ-1 drone over the Hormuz strait, without providing further details on the drone’s mission. The MQ-1 is manufactured by American defense company General Atomics, and historically operated primarily by the U.S. Air Force and the CIA.
The incident followed a series of Iranian operations against U.S. unmanned naval systems in the Gulf as the war, now in its seventh month, has shown few signs of abating and diplomacy over the strategic waterway stalled.
On Sunday, President Donald Trump said the U.S. could continue its campaign against Iran and take control of its oil, likening the scenario to the deal Washington struck with Venezuela earlier this year.
“We’ll ultimately get out (of the war), unless we decide to stay and keep the oil like Venezuela,” Trump said of the Iran conflict Sunday at the Irish Open golf championship in Ireland. He added that U.S. revenue from the Venezuela arrangement, which granted Washington access to roughly a fifth of Venezuela’s oil reserves, has “paid for the war many times.”
Under the agreement reached in August, Venezuela ceded majority U.S. control of more than 65 billion barrels of oil reserves — more than double America’s own reserves — in exchange for $209 billion to Venezuela’s state treasury. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the deal would also bring close to $100 billion in private investment to reinvigorate its economy.
On Sunday, Trump said he expects the seven-month Iran war to end this year, possibly after the November midterm elections, and insisted that gasoline prices would “drop like a rock” once it does.
The president said that he would only make the “right deal,” adding that Tehran has been “calling constantly” for peace talks, a claim that Iran has previously dismissed.
Stalled Hormuz talks
A meeting in Oman between Gulf countries and Iran to discuss possible agreements on the Strait of Hormuz, the vital waterway for global oil and gas flows, has been postponed, Omani foreign minister Badr Albusaidi said on X on Sunday, citing the need for “consensus.”
Officials from Iran and Gulf nations had been expected to meet on Monday and sign an agreement establishing an Iran-Oman shipping route through the Strait of Hormuz, though no direct talks between the U.S. and Iran were ongoing.
The Strait of Hormuz has been subjected to an Iranian and later U.S. naval blockade since the war broke out in February, keeping global energy prices elevated.
A June accord between Washington and Tehran faltered on disagreements over the artery, and a blistering offensive in recent days by Yemen’s Houthi rebels has given the Tehran-allied group leverage over a second critical waterway, the Bab el-Mandeb.
Ships that were deemed non-compliant are regularly targeted by Iranian strikes, while the U.S. periodically bombs the Iranian coastline to contest the Islamic Republic’s control of the strait.
Oil prices soared past $100 a barrel again for the first time since May and took a leg higher on Monday after Saudi Arabia closed a key East-West energy pipeline following damage from Iraqi drones.
U.S. West Texas Intermediate futures were up 2.3% to $102.39 per barrel. Brent crude, the international benchmark, traded 2.4% higher to $107.11 a barrel.
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger






