Technologies
Meta Quest Pro, Half a Year Later: Caught Between Quest 2 and Quest 3
After I tested the PSVR 2, the Quest Pro seems even more of an enigma, but it may tell us something about the upcoming Quest 3 VR headset.
The Quest 2 headset from Meta succeeded as a self-contained mainstream device for VR gaming. Following that, Meta ambitiously aimed for a lot more with the Quest Pro, a $1,500 headset built around a questionable metaverse strategy. The Pro, already on sale for $500 less than its launch price, felt mistargeted as a pro device, built for a future of work in the metaverse that isn’t here yet⊠and may never be.
In the almost six months since the Quest Pro came out, the PlayStation VR 2 emerged as another very different headset contender with similarly excellent visuals and eye-tracking. The PlayStation 5-tethered VR headset has absolutely no ambitions at all to be a work device. It just wants to play games in whatever room your PS5 lives in. Meanwhile, Apple is expected to announce its own mixed reality headset in just a few months.
There’s more. The economy has only gotten worse, and Meta’s laid off thousands of people in the last few months. Spending $1,000 on a VR headset is nothing anyone really wants to do, unless it’s somehow able to be some amazing device that can deliver lots of uses all in one. Meta is trying to make the Quest platform that multiuse thing, but it’s still best at one genre: gaming.
However, there are threads to the future. VR headsets can be amazing workout devices. Social experiences in VR can be impressive, transporting and meaningful. Already on hand are 3D art tools and simulation tools that elevate VR to incredibly professional uses. You can cast multiple monitors from your computer and use your VR headset as your magic desktop, but your patience and mileage for that may seriously vary.
The eye-tracking, face-tracking Quest Pro, packing an impressively high-res display, seems like an evolutionary step toward whatever smaller glasses-like things come later. And with software and bridges to computers and phones that will be far more refined. Meta wasn’t wrong with the Quest Pro, in theory, but it was way too early.
Read more:Â Working on the Quest Pro
By all means, don’t get the Quest Pro. The Meta Quest 3 is expected by the end of this year, and it could very well have a better processor and many of the same features at (perhaps) a lower price. Also, if you’re curious about expensive, bleeding-edge, possibly work-oriented VR devices, Apple’s expected to have its own contender in 2023, too. HTC’s even smaller Vive XR Elite is more portable, and although it doesn’t work with my glasses, it could maybe be a more practically sized travel headset for some. And if you’re looking to elevate your VR gaming beyond the Quest 2, the PlayStation VR 2 is your best bet for its promising graphics and features, even if it is tethered by a cable.
But I’ve started using the Quest Pro more recently, and some things still really stand out.
Wow, the display, and even the audio
The PlayStation VR 2 has a richer and brighter HDR OLED display, but the Quest Pro has the crispest and clearest display of nearly any VR headset I’ve ever used. Meta’s shrunken-down lens system, called pancake optics, combined with a bright LCD display ends up making a notable difference over the Quest 2. I’m appreciating once again how clear text looks, how vivid games appear and how simply clear it all is. It’s not perfect, but if price was no object this would be the ideal display for everyday use. The lenses don’t have any ribbed lines, either, unlike the PlayStation VR 2’s Fresnel lenses and several other VR headsets. I appreciate that it fits over my glasses, as always, even though the headset fit isn’t as loose and forgiving as that of the PSVR 2.
I also appreciate the audio, surprisingly. After using the PSVR 2’s earbuds, which have to be inserted every time, I’m enjoying all over again how Meta’s headsets just project sound from the headbands with no separate headphones needed at all. The Quest Pro’s audio sounds better than the PSVR 2’s earbuds, to my ears, even though the audio is open air and I can hear everything else in the room too. Its blend of VR sound and the everyday world feels like the sort of challenge future AR glasses and mixed reality headsets are going to have to solve, and Meta’s one of the few doing it as well as it can be done right now.


I moved around a lot with the Quest Pro in a demo last fall. It’s much easier to be mobile in it than on something tethered.
MetaIt’s refreshingly relaxed and wireless
Slipping the headset on over my eyes has always felt like putting on a pair of magic lenses. I think of this, the way they rest over my glasses, the way I can casually walk around the room playing Walkabout Mini Golf and not feel worried about bumping into anything. I appreciate the heightened room awareness, partly because I can see the room around the sides of the headset. Also, with its smaller controllers and naturally wireless self-contained design, I just enjoy slipping into it.
It’s also bulky
At the same time, wow, the Quest Pro is awkwardly shaped. It’s big and has a large headband, and needs its own special charger dock to charge up its headset and the controllers. It just feels like a delicate sports car you need to put back carefully in the garage every time. That’s unlike the Quest 2, which is smaller overall despite its larger front, can be tucked more easily into a carrying case, and doesn’t have the same glossy visor design. Also, because I need to charge the Pro every time I use it, it also seems more complicated to store than the also-large (but light) PSVR 2, which can simply be tucked on a shelf.


The Quest Pro (left) is smaller in some ways than the Quest 2 (right). But that stiff headband makes it hard to pack down into a bag.
Scott Stein/CNETMeta never advanced the software enough
The Quest Pro really is just a Quest in terms of apps and OS, so much so that you may wonder why it’s even needed as an upgrade. Backward compatibility is a great thing, but there was an opportunity here to rethink the interface, push mixed reality more and create a truly new class of apps. There are Quest Pro-optimized apps that use the color passthrough cameras and mixed reality features (and eye and face tracking) to different effects, but most of these extras feel tacked on, not quite necessary, gimmicky.Â
Eye and face tracking aren’t integral to Meta right now, which may be a huge relief to those seeing these sensors as doorways to a whole unsettling level of observational data collecting or more targeted advertising. But that also means the way these technologies are used doesn’t feel necessary, either, unless you’re an aspiring Quest developer who wants to make eye and face tracking apps. When I’ve tried eye and face tracking to animate my avatars, it’s had mixed results, and it sometimes made my virtual self look weirder. Meta can already use AI to help animate avatars based on voice cues, and those work well enough.Â
The PSVR 2, by comparison, uses its unique features more fully. Eye tracking is already used extensively in many launch games for foveated rendering that improves graphics results, and some games use eye tracking for controls, too.
There’s also a big gap between the phones we use and the VR/AR headsets of the moment. Qualcomm is trying to bridge this gap, and Apple, Google and Samsung will likely try to do the same. Meta has its own phone app that works with the Quest 2 and Quest Pro, but it’s not been rethought for Pro users at all. I don’t feel like I can output my VR work any more easily or intuitively, and I don’t feel like I can use apps or software I rely on all the time in easy, logical ways on the Quest Pro. When will it feel like a true extension of my laptop or my phone? I don’t know.
Meta did add an experimental hand tracking feature called Direct Touch that allows for your fingers to “press” buttons by pressing them in-air, or to press keys on hovering virtual keyboards. This more direct interaction mimics what Microsoft has already done on the HoloLens 2. Still, it’s not reliable enough to use for actual writing, and still feels a little awkward. The Quest Pro is still, mostly, best used with the controllers.
There are plenty of creative and work tools on the Quest Pro, but nearly all of these are things you can also use on the Quest 2, minus those eye tracking and better-looking mixed reality options.
The Quest 3 should get many of the Quest Pro’s features
Expect Meta’s next headset to adopt many of the Quest Pro’s best qualities: the color passthrough cameras and mixed reality capabilities, the smaller lens system and crisper visuals, and on top of that, likely a faster, better processor. The Quest 3 may not have eye tracking, but you probably won’t need that, anyway. It may also come with controllers similar to the Pro’s, or at least work with them. (I like how the Pro controllers are smaller, but I also don’t like how they need more frequent charging.)
The Quest 3 is expected to cost somewhere around $500, and if that’s true, it’ll be half the price of the Quest Pro. Even though I appreciate the Pro’s high-quality visuals and fit, there’s absolutely no reason you should buy one, even at its currently lower but still expensive $1,000 price.Â
The future is not just about VR: it’s about smaller glasses-like devices that will eventually be wearable all day, and in the meantime will work as mixed reality goggles at home. Meta’s hardware is moving on that path, but in early 2023, VR is still largely for gaming, and the Quest Pro is not a headset made for gamers, and that should tell you all you need to know. Â
Technologies
Trump media ban lawsuit set for Wednesday court hearing
President Donald Trump said he banned the three media outlets because of what he called “cumulative stories,” saying, “You get sick of it.”
MS NOW, CNN and Politico sued President Donald Trump on Monday morning in Washington, D.C., federal court, seeking to reverse his total ban on those three media outlets from the White House.
Journalists from the outlets were prevented from entering the White House on Saturday and had their credentials taken away, a day after Trump announced he would bar them from working there.
Judge Timothy Kelly later Monday ordered the Department of Justice to respond to the outletsâ request for a temporary restraining order against the ban by Tuesday.
Kelly scheduled a videoconference hearing on the outletsâ request for 3:30 p.m. ET Wednesday. The judge was nominated by Trump to the federal bench in 2017.
âThis ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles,â the lawsuit says, arguing that the ban has already âseverely impeded the ability ofâ the three outlets to cover Trump and his administration.
âPresidents from the earliest days of the Republic have disagreed with and complained about the tenor and content of press coverage of their administrations,â notes the civil complaint.
But âthe Constitution protects the liberty and property interests that news organizations and White House reporters have in their press credentials and the access those credentials afford them to cover the White House for the benefit of the public,â the suit says.
âNo official can deprive Plaintiffs of those interests on a whim â with no notice, no process, and no warning â as the President did here.â
Trump, in announcing the ban in a Truth Social post Friday, accused the outlets of writing fiction and lies about him, and warned, âOther Fake News Media Outlets to follow.â The president cited what he called âcumulative storiesâ by the three news organizations, adding, âYou get sick of it.â
On Monday morning, after the lawsuit was announced, Trump in a Truth Social post said, âThe White House is not instituting an assault on the Free Press, something which I cherish.â
âIt is instituting an assault on the FAKE NEWS, something that has grown like Cancer in our beloved United States of America,â Trump wrote. âIt is corrupt, purposeful, pervasive, fully coordinated, and totally out of control.â
âIt is a threat to our National Security, and must be stopped, NOW!â he said. Trump had not previously cited national security in justifying the ban. The president gave no examples to back up his claim.
The suit alleges the ban violates the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution by failing to give the outlets advance notice and an opportunity to challenge it, without establishing clear standards for Trumpâs decision.
The complaint also says the ban violates the Constitutionâs First Amendment by retaliating âagainst protected newsgathering and speech.â
And it says the ban violates the First Amendment for a separate reason: It bars the three media outlets âfrom a nonpublic forum for unlawful reasons.â Those reasons include so-called viewpoint discrimination, or targeting the outlets for their perceived âmotivating ideology or the opinion or perspective.â
In a joint statement Monday, the three outlets said, âThis morning, we notified the government that we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes.â
âWithout notice or process, the White House revoked our journalistsâ credentials because it objected to our reporting,â the statement said. âLeft unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the publicâs right to independent journalism free from government interference.â
Theodore Boutrous Jr., the attorney for the three outlets, said in a statement, âThe law is on our side across the board, and we look forward to presenting our arguments to the court as soon as possible.
The White House, in a statement later Monday, said Trump removed the three outlets âfrom the White House grounds after years of false reporting.â
âThe First Amendment protects their right to publish; it does not entitle them to a hard pass, briefing room seat, or place in the press pool,â the White House said. âAccess changes are nothing new. What is new, however, is the sudden claim that it becomes sacred only when the outlets are friendly to the Radical Left. The rule was never âevery outlet gets in.â It was always âour side stays in.ââ
Kelly, the judge, in November 2018 ordered the White House to restore the press pass of then-CNN correspondent Jim Acosta, which the White House revoked after the journalist had a contentious exchange with Trump earlier that month. CNN sued Trump to get Acostaâs credentials restored.
Trump referenced Kelly by name, and mentioned his ruling on Acosta, in a Truth Social post later Monday that suggested the president believes the judge will ruling against him in the new lawsuit.
âThe Judgeâs name is Tim Kelly, and he was, sadly, appointed by âTRUMP,â the president wrote.
âIn other words, almost without question and, as usual, weâll go for appeal because Fake News people and publications that only write negatively, and who violate our National Security by writing false and defamatory stories with unknown âsources,â shouldnât be allowed access to the most important Office anywhere in the World.â
In addition to Trump, the defendants named in the complaint include Steven Cheung, his assistant for communications, White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles, and Sean Curran, director of the U.S. Secret Service.
The named plaintiffs are the three outlets and three White House reporters: Akayla Gardner of MS NOW, Betsy Klein of CNN, and Politicoâs Cheyenne Haslett. The three journalists were denied entry to the White House on Saturday and their hard passes were taken away by a Secret Service officer there, the suit says.
On Sunday night, the White House removed CNN from its scheduled rotation as the pool television network for the White House travel pool. The pool was set to travel Monday with Trump for his visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly.
The lawsuit cites the White Houseâs removal of CNN from Mondayâs pool schedule as an example of the ban âcausing irreparable harm toâ the outlets.
After the suit was announced Monday, members of the White House television press pool decided not to cover Trump ahead of his trip or in New York because of the action targeting CNN.
The suit is being filed in the same court where The Associated Press has a pending lawsuit against the White House for a ban on that wire serviceâs journalists working in certain restricted spaces in the White House, including the Oval Office and on Air Force One. The White Houseâs partial ban on the AP came in February 2025 after the wire service refused to reflect Trumpâs renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the âGulf of Americaâ in how it routinely refers to that international body of water.
Trump told reporters Friday that the latest ban is worth implementing, even if it is overturned by a judge.
âI think itâs good to point it out, whether it survives or doesnât,â he said.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, during an interview Monday morning in New York with CNBCâs âSquawk Box,â said, âI donât know much about it,â when asked his opinion of the ban.
But Bessent also suggested the ban was justified, saying âlegacy mediaâ is unpopular with the public âbecause of the perceived bias.â
Asked by CNBCâs Joe Kernen about a possible âoff-rampâ from the ban, Bessent said, âWeâll see. Maybe itâs a change in coverage at the White House.â
Bessent also said, âThe one thing Iâm sure of: The press cares more about the press than anything else,â claiming news media focused more on the personal experiences of journalists at the aborted White House Correspondentsâ Dinner in April than a gunmanâs would-be assassination of Trump.
âOne thing Iâm sure is that this [ban] will be covered by the press,â Bessent said. âAnd, you know, I think we could get back to something that is a little more, I canât even remember which network it is, fair and balanced.â
Fox News, a media outlet that is often criticized as being biased toward Trump and his administration, previously used the slogan âFair and Balanced,â before discontinuing its use about a decade ago.
Jameel Jaffer, executive director of The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, in a statement Monday, said, âWeâre glad to see that these news organizations are suing.â
âThe presidentâs decision to bar them from the White House for the content of their reporting is a flagrant violation of the First Amendment,â Jaffer said. âItâs an attack both on press freedom and the publicâs right to independent information about the government. We will support these news organizations in court.â
White House Correspondentsâ Association President Jacqui Heinrich, in a statement Saturday, said, âThe American people, through a free and independent press, must be able to scrutinize those elected to power, regardless of whether government officials view it favorably.â
âThatâs why courts have repeatedly held that once the White House provides access to journalists, it cannot deny that access arbitrarily or based on the content of their reporting,â said Heinrich, a Fox News correspondent.
In the APâs lawsuit, Judge Trevor McFadden ruled in April 2025 that Trumpâs partial ban of the agencyâs journalists violated the First Amendment and ordered that the AP be given the same access as other members of the presidential press pool to the Oval Office, other restricted areas of the White House and Air Force One.
âThe Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalists â be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhere â it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints,â wrote McFadden, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump.
âThe Constitution requires no less,â the judge said.
Rather than allowing the AP access to places the White House press pool goes to cover the president, the White House said it would abolish the so-called wire pool, which included the AP, Bloomberg and Reuters. The wire pool for decades had traveled with presidents to bring news coverage to news consumers around the world. It has not been reinstated.
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in a 2-1 vote in June 2025, blocked McFaddenâs ruling from taking effect while Trump appealed it.
The panel heard oral arguments in the appeal in November but has not issued a decision.
Disclosure: CNBC and MS NOW are divisions of Versant Media.
Technologies
United States secures pact with Greenland and Denmark for enduring security oversight, will deploy troops to dogsled station and reopen Cold War facility
The United States has entered a security agreement with Greenland and Denmark, gaining permanent control over security and planning to reopen Cold War-era bases. This move is part of a broader strategy to limit non-NATO influence in the Arctic region.
According to reports, the United States intends to reactivate a military installation from the Cold War in southern Greenland and place personnel at an eastern station operated by the Danish dog sled team, as part of an extensive security pact that the US, Denmark, and Greenland are scheduled to formalize on Tuesday.
Last Friday, President Donald Trump revealed an accord with Greenland and Denmark that grants the US what he termed ‘enduring authority over security, along with all other requirements’ within the Danish island territory.
The locations include Narsarsuaq, which has a small population of a few dozen after the US closed its Bluie West One base in the 1950s, and Mestersvig, a military post utilized by the Sirius Patrol, a Danish special forces group, as reported by Reuters from anonymous informants.
The specifics of the agreement are not yet public and could be confirmed only after the three nations sign at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, per the report. The White House, along with the Danish and Greenlandic authorities, did not promptly reply to Verumâs inquiries for a statement.
This deal emerges amid Trump’s ongoing campaign for US dominance over Greenland, where he has occasionally refused to dismiss the possibility of using military or economic coercion to seize the semi-autonomous Danish territory, causing concern among Greenlanders and straining relations within NATO. Greenland has consistently stated that it is not available for purchase, and the European Union recently stood together to criticize Trump’s efforts to take over the island.
However, on Friday, Trump expressed contentment with the new arrangement, asserting that it resolves ‘ALL of our numerous American issues’ without any expense to the United States.
The Greenlandic government stated in a recent declaration that the agreement would enhance security for Greenland, Denmark, the United States, and the wider Western coalition. Additionally, Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen emphasized that the pact ‘acknowledges the sovereignty and territorial wholeness of the Kingdom, as well as the Greenlandic people’s entitlement to self-governance.’
On Monday, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio urged leaders from Arctic partners, such as Canada, Denmark, Greenland, Norway, and Sweden, to increase defense expenditures in the area, highlighting the importance of building independent military and economic strengths, along with investing in essential infrastructure.
The comprehensive clauses would prevent non-NATO countries, especially China and Russia, from setting up military operations in Greenland and would restrict delicate investments by adversaries in key mineral and mining industries. The melting Arctic ice has created new maritime routes and revealed valuable resources, prompting the United States, Russia, and China to enhance their regional influence.
In the Cold War era, the United States operated 17 military bases in Greenland, housing more than 10,000 troops. Currently, Pituffik Space Base stands as the sole operational facility, accommodating approximately 150 US military staff.
Technologies
AI stock valuations may have peaked. Trivariate Research thinks these shares can keep working
Revenue growth could more than offset anticipated contractions in stock multiples for some key AI stocks over the next few years
It may all be downhill from here for valuations of artificial intelligence-related stocks, but that doesnât mean investors need to start fleeing the space en masse, according to Trivariate Research. Revenue growth could more than offset anticipated contractions in multiples for some key AI stocks over the next few years, the firm said. âWe think that the interest rate cycle, and policy direction on AI both yield the same answer â that multiples for AI-related names are likely to continue to decline, and maybe have permanently peaked,â wrote Trivariate founder Adam Parker. Still, âwe continue to want exposure to this group.â On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve raised its overnight interbank borrowing rate to a range of 3.75% to 4% â the first hike in more than three years. The hike followed a hot August jobs report that exceeded Wall Streetâs expectations, as well as an inflation uptick in August. Higher interest rates can hurt AI stocks as many companies involved in the ongoing buildout of computing power are heavily indebted. As rates rise, these companies will have to pay more to borrow money. AI companies are also facing political pushback on multiple fronts. Multiple states are considering bans on data center construction, with 71% of Americans opposing construction projects in their area, according to a Gallup poll published in May . Trivariate said Sunday that job losses due to AI expected next year could also mean additional regulation of the technology that could have consequences for stock returns. Still, Trivariateâs Adam Parker thinks investors shouldnât give up on the space completely. The research firm put together a list of AI stocks over the weekend whose revenue expansion could more than make up for declining valuations. Among them are data center operator Iren , along with cloud providers Nebius and CoreWeave . Chipmakers AMD and Marvell Technology and database manager Oracle also made the list. CoreWeave popped more than 6% Monday as the broader AI trade outperformed to start the week. Still, shares are down more than 26% over the past three months. Oracle rose slightly on the day, but is down more than 19% over the three six months. To be sure, it trades at a slight discount to the broader market. Oracle has a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 16.4, per FactSet, while the S & P 500 has a multiple of 19.3. AI chipmaker Marvell has been on a fairly steady rise since the end of August and is up about 200% year to date. AMD, which jumped 9% on the day, has also rallied 184% in 2026. âWe remain directionally optimistic for the near-term,â Parker said. âThe earnings narrative of continued upward earnings revisions, remains intact.â
This site is now part of Versant. By continuing to use this service, you agree to our Terms. You also acknowledge that our updated Privacy Policy applies, including to your existing data. For details on your data rights, click here.
On this service, we and our vendors use cookies and other tools (âCookiesâ) to store and access information on your device, such as device identifiers, IP address, and your browser type. You can access a list of all our potential 1021 vendors by selecting âIAB and Google Vendors,â although we may work with only a small selection of these on this service. Your data may be used to save and communicate your privacy choices; ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug our products and services; personalize advertising and content; for advertising and content measurement; to conduct audience research and services development; so we can improve our services and develop new ones; to match and combine offline data with your online activity; and for social features. We may share this data with select vendors with your consent.
Click âI Acceptâ, to consent to our use of these Cookies or âReject Allâ to reject our use of these Cookies. Click âManage Choicesâ to set your preferences. If you previously made choices with respect to Versantâs use of Cookies on this browser and device, you will need to update them. You can adjust your choices any time through the âCookie Preferencesâ link in the footer of relevant Versant sites or in-app settings. Visit our Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more.
We will also use other Cookies that are essential or related to our services, including for security and fraud prevention.
Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.
– Your Privacy
– Strictly Necessary
– Save and communicate privacy choices 516 partners can use this special purpose
– Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 651 partners can use this special purpose
– Deliver and present advertising and content 639 partners can use this special purpose
– Store and/or access information on a device 847 partners can use this purpose
– Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 988 partners can use this purpose
– Targeted Advertising
– Content Selection
On this service, we and our vendors use cookies and other tools (âCookiesâ) to store and access information on your device, such as device identifiers, IP address, and your browser type. Your data may be used to save and communicate your privacy choices; ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug our products and services; personalize advertising and content; for advertising and content measurement; to conduct audience research and services development; so we can improve our services and develop new ones; to match and combine offline data with your online activity; and for social features. We may share this data with select vendors with your consent. You can adjust your choices any time through the âCookie Preferencesâ link in the footer of relevant Versant sites or in-app settings.
We will also use other Cookies that are essential or related to our services, including for security and fraud prevention. To learn more about some of our vendors, see the IAB and Google Vendors under each purpose. Visit our Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more.
Always Active
These Cookies and SDKs are required for Service functionality, including security and fraud prevention, and to enable any purchasing capabilities. You can set your browser to block these tracking technologies, but some parts of the site may not function properly.
The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.
Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.
Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.
Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.
– Use limited data to select advertising 787 partners can use this purposeAdvertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).
– Create profiles for personalised advertising 633 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.
– Use profiles to select personalised advertising 637 partners can use this purposeAdvertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.
– Create profiles to personalise content 259 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.
– Use profiles to select personalised content 231 partners can use this purposeContent presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.
– Measure advertising performance 912 partners can use this purposeInformation regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.
– Measure content performance 403 partners can use this purposeInformation regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.
– Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 575 partners can use this purposeReports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).
– Develop and improve services 683 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.
– Use limited data to select content 179 partners can use this purposeContent presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).
These Cookies and SDKs are used to collect data about your browsing habits, use of the Services, your preferences, and your interaction with advertisements across platforms and devices for the purpose of delivering targeted advertising content, both on our Services and on third party sites. Third-party sites and services also use Targeting Cookies to deliver content, including advertisements relevant to your interests on the Services. If you reject these Cookies or SDKs, you will see less relevant advertising.
Data collected under this category through Cookies and SDKs can also be used to select and deliver personalized content, such as news articles and videos.
Consent Leg.Interest
label
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of ĐĄrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger

