Connect with us

Technologies

iPhone 14 Pro vs. Pixel 7 Pro Cameras Tested: Which Takes Better Photos?

Both these top-end phones take amazing photos, but which one does it better? We test both side-by-side to find out.

This story is part of Focal Point iPhone 2023, CNET’s collection of news, tips and advice around Apple’s most popular product.

Google’s Pixel 7 Pro packs an excellent triple camera system, a sleek design and streamlined Android 13 software that’s a delight to use. The phone impressed me so much I gave it a highly sought-after CNET Editors’ Choice award

But the competition is brutal, with Apple’s top-end iPhone 14 Pro also rocking a potent set of specs and a camera setup capable of taking truly superb images. And yes, we loved the 14 Pro enough to give it an Editors’ Choice award too. 

So which one of these award-winning smartphones packs the best camera setup and which one should you consider if you’re looking for the best photography phone around? I took both phones around the stunning Edinburgh suburb of Leith to find out. 

It’s an interesting matchup as both phones have similar camera offerings with a main standard lens, an ultrawide lens and a telephoto zoom. And both have already proved their photographic prowess in our full reviews, with rich images and excellent dynamic range being delivered on both sides. 

I’ve since put the Pixel 7 Pro through some more tests. And though it wasn’t top of the pack in night mode situations, I found its zoom gave the epic Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra a run for its money

Photograph of a boat on a riverPhotograph of a boat on a river

Pixel 7 Pro, main lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Image of a boat on a riverImage of a boat on a river

iPhone 14 Pro, main lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Take a look at the photos above from the Pixel 7 Pro’s 50-megapixel and the iPhone 14 Pro’s 48-megapixel main camera lens. Both scenes are well exposed here, with controlled blue skies and plenty of detail to be seen in the more shadowy areas. The iPhone’s color balance is a bit warmer, which I think suits the scene well, although the Pixel’s image is arguably a touch more natural looking. 

A wide-angle image of a boat on a riverA wide-angle image of a boat on a river

Pixel 7 Pro, ultrawide lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

A wide-angle image of a boat on a riverA wide-angle image of a boat on a river

iPhone 14 Pro, ultrawide lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Switch to the ultrawide lens, and again both phones have done a great job in capturing this high contrast scene above. There’s very little to choose between them, but I think the Pixel 7 Pro’s more natural color tones might give it the edge.

An image showing riverside buildings and moored narrowboats.An image showing riverside buildings and moored narrowboats.

Pixel 7 Pro, 5x optical zoom lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

An image showing riverside buildings and moored narrowboats.An image showing riverside buildings and moored narrowboats.

iPhone 14 Pro, 3x optical zoom lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Things change when we switch to the zoom lenses though, most notably because the Pixel 7 Pro’s 5x offers a much closer view than the 3x optical zoom of the iPhone 14 Pro. I love a longer zoom as it helps you find different photo compositions in a scene that would be lost to those who only have wide angle lenses. Using the zoom lens for the photos above let me capture a totally different scene, but I didn’t have to physically move to get it.

That extra reach is noticeable on the Pixel’s shot, with a much closer zoom on the buildings in the distance. Both phones have achieved a good exposure however, and while the Pixel’s image is noticeably warmer (particularly on the buildings themselves), I like the color balances of both shots. 

An image showing riverside buildings.An image showing riverside buildings.

Pixel 7 Pro, 5x zoom lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

An image showing riverside buildings.An image showing riverside buildings.

iPhone 14 Pro, 3x zoom lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Again, that extra zoom on the Pixel let me get a tighter composition on the buildings next to the river in the images above, and it’s a better-looking photo as a result. That said, I prefer the tones and exposure of the iPhone’s shot, with brighter whites and a more vibrant pop of orange visible on the central building and richer blue tones in the sky.

Wide angle image of a riverside sceneWide angle image of a riverside scene

Pixel 7 Pro, ultrawide lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Wide angle image of a riverside sceneWide angle image of a riverside scene

iPhone 14 Pro, ultrawide lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

The ultrawide photos above are more mixed however. While both phones achieved a generally decent exposure, they both have slightly blown out highlights visible in the distant clouds. And while I prefer the more natural blue sky of the iPhone 14 Pro, the Pixel 7 Pro has achieved more vibrant color tones on the buildings and trees toward the center of the frame. It’s tough to make a call on which is «better» here. 

An image showing trees around a riverAn image showing trees around a river

Pixel 7 Pro, main lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

An image showing trees around a riverAn image showing trees around a river

iPhone 14 Pro, main lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Back to the main camera lens, and there’s again very little to choose between the two pictures above. There’s tons of detail in both, and the overall exposure is spot on. If I were nitpicking — which I am — I’d say the Pixel 7 Pro’s sky has a bit too much of a purple tinge in it and it’s a slightly more contrasty scene overall. While that’s resulted in deeper orange hues on the fall leaves, it’s less representative of the actual colors of the scene. It’s largely down to personal preference, but I’m marginally erring toward the iPhone’s shot here.

A wide angle image showing trees around a riverA wide angle image showing trees around a river

Pixel 7 Pro, ultrawide lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

A wide angle image showing trees around a riverA wide angle image showing trees around a river

iPhone 14 Pro, ultrawide lens.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

The photos above show the same scene but from the ultrawide lens this time. To my eye, it’s an easier win for the iPhone here. The overall color balance is more natural. And while the iPhone kept a decent contrast in the darker area in the bottom left, the Pixel has tried to brighten this area artificially, resulting in a weird-looking grey patch that I’m not keen on. 

An image showing a close up of a flower.An image showing a close up of a flower.

Pixel 7 Pro, wide-angle lens with macro focus.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

An image showing a close up of a flower.An image showing a close up of a flower.

iPhone 14 Pro, wide-angle lens with macro focus.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

With the Pixel 7 Pro now packing auto-focus on its ultrawide lens, it’s able to offer macro photography as it can focus within a couple of inches of the lens. It’s something Apple introduced on the iPhone 13 Pro, and it’s great fun to experiment with. 

In the macro photos above, I prefer the image from the Pixel 7 Pro’s camera. The white balance has resulted in more vibrant — and more accurate — blue-purple tones on the flower’s petals. The leaves in the background also have more of an emerald tone, rather than the yellow-green tones seen on the iPhone’s shot. 

A close up image of a dandelion in grass with a cloudy blue sky behind.A close up image of a dandelion in grass with a cloudy blue sky behind.

Pixel 7 Pro, wide-angle lens with macro focus.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

A close up image of a dandelion in grass with a cloudy blue sky behind.A close up image of a dandelion in grass with a cloudy blue sky behind.

iPhone 14 Pro, wide-angle lens with macro focus.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

And it’s much the same in the pictures above when I used the phones to get a low-down shot of this dandelion, with the blue sky behind it. The Pixel 7 Pro’s shot has much more vibrant green tones in the grasses around the subject. The iPhone 14 Pro captured a warmer scene, with more yellow tones seen in the grasses that I personally don’t like as much. 

A selfie of a man wearing a hatA selfie of a man wearing a hat

Pixel 7 Pro selfie camera test.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

A selfie of a man wearing a hatA selfie of a man wearing a hat

iPhone 14 Pro selfie camera test.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

The Pixel 7 Pro is packing a 10.8-megapixel front-facing selfie camera, which is slightly below the iPhone 14 Pro’s 12 megapixels. It’s not a huge difference, there is slightly more detail visible when you zoom in. Both shots are generally solid, however, although I think the Pixel has gone a bit too «HDR» by reducing the highlights on my face too much. Personally, I prefer how I look in the iPhone’s image. 

selfie-wide-pixelselfie-wide-pixel

Pixel 7 Pro wide-angle selfie test.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

selfie-wide-iphoneselfie-wide-iphone

iPhone 14 Pro wide-angle selfie test.

Both phones have a wider-angle option for the front-facing cameras, which is helpful if you want to capture more of your surroundings or want to squash more of your friends into the picture. I took the photos above in this mode, and the Pixel actually has the edge slightly in terms of fine image details. But again, I prefer the exposure and contrast from the iPhone as the Pixel’s HDR has flattened the tones in my face a bit too much for my liking. 

A night time image of a pub on a cobbled street.A night time image of a pub on a cobbled street.

Pixel 7 Pro, night mode.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

A night time image of a pub on a cobbled street.A night time image of a pub on a cobbled street.

iPhone 14 Pro, night mode.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

When switching to night mode on both phones, I had to give an early win to the iPhone in the photos above. Its white balance produced a nicer-looking shot without the overly warm orange tone seen in the Pixel’s image. 

night-roseleaf-pixel-100-cropnight-roseleaf-pixel-100-crop

Pixel 7 Pro night mode, 100% crop.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

night-roseleaf-iphone-100-cropnight-roseleaf-iphone-100-crop

iPhone 14 Pro, night mode, 100% crop.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

It’s also clear that the iPhone’s image is sharper when cropping in to 100% on both images, with the Pixel’s shot showing some motion blur, particularly on the pub sign. Look at the spotlights on the wall sculptures above; the Pixel’s shot hasn’t been able to capture the dynamic range here, resulting in blow-out areas, while the iPhone has done a much better job of keeping those bright tones under control. 

night-shore-pixelnight-shore-pixel

Pixel 7 Pro, night mode.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

night-shore-iphonenight-shore-iphone

iPhone 14 Pro, night mode.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

There’s not as much to choose between in these night-time shots above that I took overlooking Leith Shore. Both have similar color tones, exposure and only marginal improvements on the iPhone’s shot when viewed at 100%. 

night-shore-zoom-pixelnight-shore-zoom-pixel

Pixel 7 Pro night mode, 5x zoom.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

night-shore-zoom-iphonenight-shore-zoom-iphone

iPhone 14 Pro, night mode, 3x zoom.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

Switch to the zoom mode, and there’s a bigger difference between the two phones. In the images above, the Pixel’s shot is brighter and more vibrant but suffers hugely from motion blur, despite that fact that I stabilized myself against a bridge wall when taking the shot. I took three images here and this was the best I could get. 

night-shore-zoom-pixel-100-cropnight-shore-zoom-pixel-100-crop

Pixel 7 Pro, night mode, 5x zoom at 100% crop.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

night-shore-zoom-iphone-100-cropnight-shore-zoom-iphone-100-crop

iPhone 14 Pro, night mode, 3x zoom at 100% crop.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

You can really see how blurry the Pixel’s image is when cropping in to 100%. Sure, the iPhone doesn’t have the same reach with its 3x zoom. But its shot is much sharper and clearer, and it easily takes the win here.

night-flare-pixelnight-flare-pixel

Pixel 7 Pro, night mode.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

night-flare-iphonenight-flare-iphone

iPhone 14 Pro, night mode.

Andrew Lanxon/CNET

I also found that the Pixel 7 Pro is particularly susceptible to lens flare at night when shooting towards bright light sources like the street lamp shown in the pictures above. While both cameras suffer from lens flare, the Pixel’s is particularly problematic since most of the night sky is filled with red-pink flares surrounding the light. It’s a shame because this would otherwise have been a nice night-time scene. 

Which phone takes better pictures?

Both phones took some truly superb photos during this test, and it’s not easy to give either one the definitive win. Some elements of what makes a «better» photo will come down to personal preference. In well-lit outdoor shots, I found that the Pixel 7 Pro achieved a more natural color tone from its main lens than the iPhone managed. But its colors weren’t as good in some wider-angle shots. Of course, you can set up different photographic styles on the iPhone to customize how the camera captures photos and make them look more natural if that’s your preference.

At night the iPhone is the clear winner though, with better colors, crisper detail and a superior ability to handle bright light sources — both in terms of exposure and lens flare. However, the Pixel 7 Pro absolutely takes the win with its superior zoom skills, with its 5x zoom letting you snag beautiful, crystal-clear images that are simply out of reach of the iPhone’s 3x zoom. I also preferred the look of the Pixel’s macro images in all of the tests I shot. 

So which is «best» will come down to what you want most from your phone camera. If night photography is important, then go for the iPhone 14 Pro. If you want zoom skills to find creative compositions in your landscapes and street photography, then the Pixel 7 Pro is for you. 

If you just want a great all around camera to snap vibrant shots of your kids at the beach, your friend’s food at a local market or some stunning woodland scenes on your next hike, then either phone will suit you incredibly well. Your bigger decision will instead come down to whether you want to go with iOS or Android as your operating system and whether spending the extra hundred bucks or so on the iPhone 14 Pro is worth it. 

Technologies

The Porsche Cayenne Finally Goes Electric, and It’s the Most Powerful Porsche Ever

Porsche has been gradually electrifying its lineup, and the fan-favorite Cayenne is the latest to go green.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Cloudflare CEO Apologizes for ‘Unacceptable’ Outage and Explains What Went Wrong

For several hours Tuesday, a significant portion of the internet was unavailable in Cloudflare’s worst outage since 2019.

The Cloudflare outage on Tuesday that disrupted access to many websites and services — including OpenAI, Spotify, X, Grindr, Letterboxd and Canva — was the company’s worst outage since 2019, CEO Matthew Prince says.

Other disruptions have centered on specific network features, Prince wrote in a blog post. «But in the last 6+ years we’ve not had another outage that has caused the majority of core traffic to stop flowing through our network.»

Cloudflare is a cloud services and cybersecurity company based in San Francisco that is used by approximately 20% of all websites, according to W3Techs. It’s one of a handful of services, along with Amazon Web Services, CrowdStrike and Fastly (all of which have experienced major outages in the past few years) that you might never have heard of, but that provide essential internet infrastructure.

The bulk of sites and services impacted by Tuesday’s outage, which began around 3:30 a.m. PT, seemed to recover within just over three hours. By the end of the day, everything had returned to normal, and Cloudflare set about explaining what went wrong. Here’s what you need to know.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


What caused the Cloudflare outage?

Cloudflare was keen to emphasize that the outage was not caused either directly or indirectly by a cyberattack. At first the company did suspect it might have originated from a «hyper-scale DDoS attack,» Prince said in his blog post. But it turned out that the outage resulted from an internal software failure.

A change in one of Cloudflare’s databases generated a larger-than-expected feature file, which was too big for the company’s software to run, said Prince. This caused the software to fail.

Once Cloudflare identified the problem, it was able to replace the problematic file with an earlier version and get most traffic flowing normally again by 6:30 a.m. PT. 

«We are sorry for the impact to our customers and to the Internet in general,» said Prince. «Given Cloudflare’s importance in the Internet ecosystem any outage of any of our systems is unacceptable. That there was a period of time where our network was not able to route traffic is deeply painful to every member of our team. We know we let you down today.»

Which sites and services were impacted?

Cloudflare has a massive range of clients across the internet, ranging from websites that are household names to smaller services you might not have heard of. Due to its size, when it went down, it took many of those sites and services with it.

Among those affected by the outage was Downdetector, which is where most people go to report problems when services are offline. (Downdetector is owned by the same parent company as CNET, Ziff Davis.)

Once it got back up and running, Downdetector said that it received over 2.1 million reports during the outage period. Over 435,000 of these came from the US, with the UK, Japan and Germany appearing to be the countries that were next most affected.

Most of the reports pertained to Cloudflare, but other affected companies also received a significant number of reports. They include X (320,549 reports), League of Legends (130,260 reports), OpenAI (81,077 reports), Spotify (93,377 reports) and Grindr (25,031 reports).

How did the outage unfold?

Cloudflare first acknowledged the outage at 3:48 a.m. PT. The company issued a statement on its system status page saying that it was aware of the problem. 

«Cloudflare is aware of, and investigating an issue which impacts multiple customers: Widespread 500 errors, Cloudflare Dashboard and API also failing,» it said. «We are working to understand the full impact and mitigate this problem. More updates to follow shortly.»

At 5:09 a.m. PT, the company said the issue had been identified and a fix was being implemented. In the subsequent hours, errors began to drop and services gradually came back online.

Cloudflare added at 9:14 a.m. PT that most services had returned to normal. «A full post-incident investigation and details about the incident will be made available asap,» it said.

Is the internet stable and reliable?

The Cloudflare outage comes just one month after Amazon Web Services went down, causing havoc across the internet. The AWS outage affected sites including Reddit, Snapchat, Roblox and Fortnite, sparking many to ask whether having such huge swaths of the internet reliant on a few centralized services is sensible or safe.

«The Cloudflare outage is not explicitly caused or linked to the AWS or Azure outages last month, but like those failures, it shows the impact of concentration risk,» said Brent Ellis, principal analyst at Forrester Research. «In this case, the 3 hour 20 minute outage could have direct and indirect losses of around $250 million to $300 million when you consider the cost of down-time and the downstream effects of services like Shopify or Etsy that host the stores for tens to hundreds of thousands of businesses.» 

The disruption to services from ChatGPT maker OpenAI in particular highlighted concerns about the growing investment in artificial intelligence and the fragility of the cloud infrastructure that AI relies upon to function every day.

«The most dominant platform did not buckle because of simultaneous queries or the release of a new competitive model, but because of a problem with Cloudflare, a web security and performance provider,» said Sarah Kreps, director of the Tech Policy Institute at Cornell University. «The issue exposes the reality that this multibillion, even trillion-dollar investment in AI is only as reliable as its least scrutinized third-party infrastructure.»

Continue Reading

Technologies

The iPhone 17’s Unexpectedly Satisfying Tips and Accessories

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media