Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra Review: The King of Extra

The Galaxy S23 Ultra builds on Samsung’s camera strengths. But Galaxy S22 Ultra owners don’t need to upgrade yet.

This story is part of Samsung Event, CNET’s collection of news, tips and advice around Samsung’s most popular products.

Samsung clearly wants the Galaxy S23 Ultra to be the ultimate camera for cinematographers and photographers. I’m certainly not a professional filmmaker, nor do I consider myself to be a shutterbug. But after using the Galaxy S23 Ultra for several days, it’s clear the new camera upholds the areas in which Samsung already excels — like low-light photography — and pushes those strengths a little further.

The $1,200 ( 1,249, AU$1,949) Galaxy S23 Ultra will be available on Feb. 17 alongside the rest of Samsung’s new phone lineup, which includes the $800 Galaxy S23 and $1,000 Galaxy S23 Plus. Like last year’s Galaxy S22 Ultra, the S23 Ultra’s giant screen, high price and souped-up camera may be too much for the average person.

The name “Ultra” says it all; this phone is for people who want a phone that’s over the top. Compared to the Galaxy S23 and S23 Plus, the Ultra offers a closer zoom magnification than most people will probably need, a stylus that stores inside the phone and a massive 6.8-inch screen that’s larger than both those of the iPhone 14 Pro Max and Google Pixel 7 Pro. You might not need all that excess, but after using this phone for a few days, I wouldn’t blame you for wanting them.

9.1

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

You’re receiving price alerts for Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra

Like

  • Fast performance
  • Excellent main camera, especially in low light
  • Bright screen
  • Included stylus
  • Double the storage in the base model
  • Four years of Android OS updates

Don’t Like

  • High price
  • Photos don’t always look natural, especially selfies
  • No improvements to fast charging

Samsung largely achieves its goal of providing a deluxe phone with an excellent camera and giant display. But it isn’t perfect. That high price is hard to ignore, and photos taken on the Galaxy S23 Ultra don’t always look as natural as those captured on the iPhone 14 Pro or Pixel 7 Pro.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra camera is a step up

If you watched Samsung’s Unpacked presentation, you already know the S23 Ultra’s main camera is its prized attribute. Samsung added a 200-megapixel sensor for the first time, marking a technical upgrade from the S22 Ultra’s 108-megapixel main shooter.

With the S23 Ultra, you have the option to shoot photos at a 12-megapixel, 50-megapixel or 200-megapixel resolution, which you can adjust in the settings menu alongside the camera’s viewfinder. Samsung’s Expert Raw app is now integrated into the native camera app after you download it for the first time. Although I don’t typically edit raw photos myself, the use case certainly seems appropriate for a phone like this. Shooting in raw allows photographers to edit the full, uncompressed version of an image, giving them more flexibility and data to work with in terms of colors and exposure.

Under-the-hood improvements to color, dynamic range, autofocus and low-light performance seem more meaningful than the resolution bump. Samsung said when announcing the S23 Ultra that its new image sensor is better at minimizing noise, and that its algorithms have gotten better at enhancing color tones and details. Samsung largely positioned these improvements in the context of video recording and low-light photography, but they seem evident across general still photography, too. These changes are more noticeable to the naked eye than the increased resolution.

Unless otherwise specified, the photos in this article were taken at the default 12-megapixel resolution because the 200-megapixel files are just too large to display here. You can still see changes in how the camera processes color, skin tone and dynamic range even at this lower resolution. However, I did capture several 200-megapixel photos throughout the course of my testing.

The biggest differences I noticed in those 200-megapixel photos compared to the 108-megapixel images taken on the Galaxy S22 Ultra had to do with color. Flowers were more vibrant shades of orange and trees looked more lush. The difference in resolution is only noticeable when you zoom all the way in to view the actual size of the pixels.

The photos below, however, show how the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s camera has changed compared to the S22 Ultra’s. Take a look at the photos of trees and shrubbery taken at a park. Although you might not notice it in the smaller embedded version below, the leaves in the S23 Ultra’s photo have a bit more separation and crispness compared to the S22 Ultra’s, and there’s also better contrast in the tree bark.

In the photos of sweets arranged in a baker’s display case below, the S23 Ultra captured more detail on the strawberries in the top row.

Those who have taken photos with Samsung phones before might have noticed that colors sometimes look exaggerated. Samsung has improved this in recent years, but the Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro still take photos that look more natural overall.

But, natural doesn’t always mean better. There are times when Samsung’s overstated color works well, and others when it doesn’t. For photos of people and pets, for example, Samsung’s emphasis on color can result in more flattering images. In the pictures below, my husband preferred the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s photo over the more natural-looking image from the Pixel 7 Pro because it made his beard and eyes look more vibrant. But he liked the iPhone 14 Pro’s photo best because it struck the right balance of accuracy and bold color. The iPhone 14 Pro also captured a lot more detail in the cookie-shaped bench he’s sitting on.

However, Samsung’s phones don’t always handle challenging lighting scenarios very well. When snapping a photo of my husband in front of a window at a bakery, both the S23 Ultra and S22 Ultra’s images looked washed out and overexposed, although the S23 Ultra’s did have more color than the S22 Ultra’s. The iPhone 14 Pro’s was the best of the bunch in this case, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s was impressive, too.

Colors in landscape photos taken on the Galaxy S23 Ultra can look brighter and exaggerated compared to those from the iPhone 14 Pro and Pixel 7 Pro. Take a look at how that photo of the park from earlier compares to similar photos taken on the iPhone 14 Pro and Pixel 7 Pro, and you’ll notice the shades of green look more natural. The right side of the iPhone 14 Pro’s photo looks blown out, but otherwise would have been a better shot since the colors are more accurate. Still, Samsung did a great job with dynamic range; you can see the shadows more clearly in its photo compared to the others.

But Samsung is still the king of low-light photography in my book. In my testing, the Galaxy S23 Ultra captured better detail and color. The Galaxy S23 Ultra was able to focus more sharply than both the Pixel 7 Pro and iPhone 14 Pro. It was also slightly better than the Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it was sometimes a close call.

My favorite example of this is in this photo of my cat, Buddy, shown below. Even though the iPhone 14 Pro’s photo is brighter, I like the S23 Ultra’s better because it has more contrast and detail. When looking at these photos side-by-side on a large monitor, you can see the stripes in his fur more clearly. The Galaxy S22 Ultra’s photo is too soft, while the Pixel 7 Pro’s looked like it had a bluish filter over it when I viewed it on a large screen. It’s also another example of how the S23 Ultra’s emphasis on color makes for a more flattering photo.

Video recording on the Galaxy S23 Ultra was upgraded to 8K at 30 frames per second (fps), whereas it previously topped out at 24fps when shooting at that resolution. Samsung also increased the field of view when recording 8K video, which is very noticeable compared to the Galaxy S22 Ultra.

Even though Google provides more natural color in still photography, I experienced the opposite when it comes to recording video. The Galaxy S23 Ultra generally captured more realistic color and sharpness compared to the Pixel 7 Pro during my testing. The iPhone 14 Pro was a close competitor, but Samsung’s footage had a little more detail. When testing the video capabilities of each phone, I recorded clips at the highest supported resolution and frame rate. That’s 8K at 30fps for the Galaxy S23 Ultra, 8K at 24fps for the Galaxy S22 Ultra and 4K at 60fps for the iPhone 14 Pro and Google Pixel 7 Pro.

Samsung also highlighted the S23 Ultra’s new 12-megapixel selfie camera when announcing the phone, which it said separates the subject from the background better for more clarity. Selfies were sharp and colorful overall, and I preferred photos taken with the S23 Ultra’s selfie camera over the Pixel 7 Pro’s in every test. The Galaxy S22 Ultra’s were comparable to the S23 Ultra’s, but the iPhone 14 Pro’s selfies had the best overall combination of detail and accurate color. Samsung’s selfies sometimes looked unnatural since the color in my hair seemed exaggerated.

The only exception was in very dim lighting, an area where Samsung reigns supreme. Take a look at the selfie I took in a very dark theater with red lighting. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s photo has much more detail than the others.

When it comes to the rest of the cameras, you can expect the same arrangement as the Galaxy S22 Ultra. In addition to the main camera, there’s also a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera and two 10-megapixel telephoto lenses that allow for a 3x or 10x optical zoom and up to 100x digital zoom. Photos from the ultrawide camera packed plenty of color and brightness, as shown in the images below.

You’ll also get more zoom than you probably need on the S23 Ultra, but that might be useful for people who frequently take photos at concerts and sporting events. The 100x digital zoom can feel unwieldy, but Samsung does provide a higher optical zoom than its competitors. Like the S22 Ultra, the S23 Ultra can zoom optically up to 10x, while the iPhone 14 Pro is at 3x and the Pixel 7 Pro is at 5x.

Check out the photo samples below to see the difference in optical zoom levels.

Overall, I was impressed with the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s cameras. They remain the best for zoomed-in shots and low-light photography. The improvements to color and dynamic range are noticeable as well, and Samsung fans upgrading from a phone that’s at least two years old will likely see a major difference. Still, the iPhone 14 Pro’s camera was better in most situations, save for a few exceptions.

Check out the gallery below for a closer look at some photos I captured with the Galaxy S23 Ultra.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra performance

The Galaxy S23 Ultra runs on a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 processor, which isn’t surprising considering Samsung typically uses the latest Qualcomm chip for its new phones. What is surprising, however, is that Samsung decided to customize this chip more than usual for the S23 series. Samsung calls it the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, and it’s essentially a special version of the processor that’s been optimized for better performance and power efficiency. A standard version of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 is being included in rival phones like the OnePlus 11 5G.

The S23 Ultra feels fast and snappy, whether I’m just swiping around the operating system, playing games while on a video call or running Samsung’s Dex program to use my phone as a PC. I plugged my S23 Ultra into an external monitor, attached a keyboard and mouse via Bluetooth and had five apps running, including Google Docs, to take notes for this review. I never experienced any lag or overheating during any of these tasks.

The S23 Ultra can also export videos quickly, which might be helpful for those who shoot and edit video projects on their phone frequently. In my testing, it exported a 30-second 4K video clip to 1080p three seconds faster than the S22 Ultra and a full 10 seconds faster than the Pixel 7 Pro on average. The iPhone 14 Pro, however, finished the job about three seconds faster than the S23 Ultra on average. You’ll also get double the storage that’s in the base model of the Galaxy S23 Ultra (256GB versus 128GB), which gives you more space to store those video projects.

Samsung’s new phone also scored higher than the Galaxy S22 Ultra, Pixel 7 Pro and OnePlus 11 5G on benchmarks meant to test computing power in everyday tasks and in apps that require short bursts of high performance, like mobile games. The iPhone 14 Pro, however, scored higher than the S23 Ultra on the general computing benchmark (Geekbench 5) but lower on the one that measures brief periods of high intensity (3DMark Wild Life Extreme).

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra battery life and charging

The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a 5,000-mAh battery, just like the Galaxy S22 Ultra, but it should offer better power efficiency, thanks to its new processor. I need to spend more time with the phone to compare it to the S22 Ultra, but the results are promising so far. After 12 hours of use, which equates to a full workday and then some, the battery was down to 66%.

I had adaptive motion and adaptive brightness settings turned on, which adjust the screen’s refresh rate and brightness based on the situation. The always-on display feature was also turned on, but I had “tap to show” enabled, meaning it wouldn’t display the time and date unless I touched the screen. Battery life will always vary depending on how you use your device. In this scenario, I used the phone to take photos, record a few videos, check email, browse social media and stream music for about 15 minutes.

On a separate day, the Galaxy S23 Ultra still had roughly three quarters of its battery left by the middle of the workday even after shooting 4K video for roughly a half hour. We’re still conducting more battery tests on the S23 Ultra and will update this review accordingly.

I also ran a 45-minute test in which I played games, made a 10-minute video call, checked social media and streamed video; over that span the S23 Ultra dropped from 100% to 94%. The Galaxy S22 Ultra dipped to 91% during that same test. The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s results are similar to the Pixel 7’s, which also hit 94% after that 45-minute challenge. (During this test, I kept the brightness at 50%, left the high refresh rate setting turned on and switched off the always-on display.)

Like last year’s Galaxy S22 Ultra, the Galaxy S23 Ultra has a top wired charging speed of 45 watts. You need to use the correct adapter, which you’ll have to purchase separately if you don’t already own one since Samsung doesn’t bundle one in the box. So far, that 45-watt charging speed has enabled my S23 Ultra to go from 46% to 91% in just 30 minutes of charging.

That’s not bad, but it would be great to see Samsung push things further now that companies like OnePlus and Xiaomi are offering upwards of 100-watt fast charging. The Xiaomi 12T Pro, for example, supports 120-watt fast charging and went from zero to 100% in 19 minutes, according to my colleague Sareena Dayaram’s Xiaomi 12T Pro review.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra design, display and other features

The Galaxy S23 Ultra looks almost identical to the Galaxy S22 Ultra. It has the same boxy edges that give it a sharper look compared to the regular Galaxy S23 and S23 Plus. But this year, the S23 Ultra is available in cream, green, black and lavender color choices. Like last year’s device, it’s rated for IP68 water resistance, meaning it can be submerged in up to 1.5 meters of fresh water for 30 minutes.

There’s no mistake about it; the Galaxy S23 Ultra is a gigantic phone, just like its predecessor. It has a 6.8-inch screen, making it slightly bigger than the 6.7-inch iPhone 14 Pro Max and Google Pixel 7 Pro. It’s the type of phone your friends might gawk at the minute you take it out of your pocket. That’s not an insult; there are plenty of people out there who love large phones. It’s just another reminder that this phone isn’t for everyone. But if you do a lot of reading, gaming, photo editing and TV watching on your phone and don’t mind stretching your fingers for one-handed use, you’ll likely appreciate the extra screen space.

I’m also certain you’ll never struggle to see the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s screen in direct sunlight. It’s super bright, reaching 1,750 nits, which is brighter than the Pixel 7 Pro’s 1,500-nit peak brightness but not quite as luminous as the iPhone 14 Pro’s 2,000-nit peak outdoor brightness. Still, it’s bright enough to fit most people’s needs and circumstances.

You’ll also get an S Pen stylus, just like last year’s Galaxy S22 Ultra. Samsung’s Ultra lineup has effectively replaced the Galaxy Note series, which was previously known for its large screens and embedded stylus. Expect the same familiar S Pen experience on this device; as soon as you pop the pen out from the bottom of the phone, you’ll see a pop-up menu with compatible apps like Samsung Notes and the drawing app PenUp. I don’t usually use the S Pen frequently, but I found myself jotting down notes during the course of this review more than I had expected.

Samsung also once again commits to four generations of Android OS upgrades, which is on par with the OnePlus 11 and surpasses Google’s three-year promise for the Pixel 7 and 7 Pro. Samsung, OnePlus and Google all provide five years of security updates for their latest devices. That means you won’t have to worry about the S23 Ultra’s software feeling outdated anytime soon since it launches with Android 13 and Samsung’s One UI 5.1 software.

One extra feature you get by going for the Ultra or Plus instead of the regular model is ultrawideband support, which makes it easier to connect to nearby devices more precisely than Bluetooth. UWB isn’t a necessity, but it can make sharing files or using your phone as a digital car key faster and easier. We could see more services and accessories that require it in the future.

Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra: Buy or skip?

The Galaxy S23 Ultra is a lot, but in a good way. Its large screen, 200-megapixel camera, 100x zoom and S Pen might be more than most people need in a phone. But that’s exactly who Samsung is targeting, and it’s ultimately iterating on a formula that’s worked in the past.

This is a phone for people actively seeking features like large screens and versatile cameras that are willing to pay top dollar for them. If you just want a reliable new Android phone with a great camera, the cheaper Pixel 7 Pro, Galaxy S23 or Galaxy S23 Plus will likely do the trick. (However, we haven’t tested those other new Galaxy phones, so we can’t recommend them just yet).

The barrier to entry for the Galaxy S23 Ultra is higher than that of the iPhone 14 Pro and Pixel 7 Pro. But you also get certain extras like the S Pen, more storage at the base level, a slightly larger screen and a better zoom lens. Those aren’t must-haves for everyone, but this is a phone for people who want extras like these.

The Galaxy S23 Ultra’s new camera is the most significant change compared to last year’s S22 Ultra. But in my experience, the behind-the-scenes upgrades Samsung made to the way the camera captures color, skin tones and dynamic range are a more welcome improvement than increased sharpness alone.

Samsung could do more to push the Galaxy Ultra line forward in ways beyond the camera. I would have loved to see faster charging, for example. And even though the camera is impressive, the iPhone 14 Pro often outpaced it in my testing.

If you want a giant screen, a great camera and are upgrading from a phone that’s more than two years old, you won’t be disappointed with the S23 Ultra. Just try to snag it at a discount through a trade-in deal to make that $1,200 price easier to swallow.

How we test phones

Every phone tested by CNET’s reviews team was actually used in the real world. We test a phone’s features, play games and take photos. We examine the display to see if it’s bright, sharp and vibrant. We analyze the design and build to see how it is to hold and whether it has an IP-rating for water resistance. We push the processor’s performance to the extremes using both standardized benchmark tools like GeekBench and 3DMark, along with our own anecdotal observations navigating the interface, recording high-resolution videos and playing graphically intense games at high refresh rates.

All the cameras are tested in a variety of conditions from bright sunlight to dark indoor scenes. We try out special features like night mode and portrait mode and compare our findings against similarly priced competing phones. We also check out the battery life by using it daily as well as running a series of battery drain tests.

We take into account additional features like support for 5G, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and face sensors, stylus support, fast charging speeds, foldable displays among others that can be useful. And we of course balance all of this against the price to give you the verdict on whether that phone, whatever price it is, actually represents good value.

Technologies

Bessent Describes Meeting With China’s He Lifeng as Productive Before Trump-Xi Summit

Scott Bessent said his meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng was successful, with discussions covering AI, trade, and other issues before the Trump-Xi summit. The leaders are also expected to address economic competition and the expiring U.S.-China trade truce.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that his meeting with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng was successful ahead of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the United States this week.

The discussions addressed artificial intelligence, trade, and other matters before the Sept. 24 summit between Trump and Xi in Washington, D.C.

Speaking after the meeting with U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at his side, Bessent said the two delegations discussed creating a “U.S.-China AI Dialogue.” The United States proposed a notification system for AI-related incidents.

He said the system would apply to incidents that reach “a national security level from AI.”

“ We believe that, as with any cross-border activity, shifting from opacity to greater transparency between the world’s leading and second-leading AI powers is extremely important,” he said.

The meeting with He occurs as Washington debates AI safety and national security more intensely while the United States and China vie for technological leadership. The Trump administration has supported voluntary safeguards centered on national security rather than sweeping mandatory requirements for AI developers. The topic is expected to feature in talks between Xi and Trump during the Chinese leader’s visit.

Senior AI industry executives have recently cautioned that the technology may rapidly spiral beyond control and create broad new dangers. They called on Washington to establish guardrails and regulations for the sector, an approach Trump has mocked.

Greer said the United States and China have put the U.S.-China Board of Trade into operation to support trade negotiations by identifying a “critical mass of goods” that could be handled separately “when and if there are trade measures” later.

Those products could include “consumer goods, low-tech items” from China and “energy products, agricultural goods, potentially medical devices” from the United States, Greer said.

The meeting takes place ahead of Xi’s high-stakes trip to Washington this week, his first during Trump’s second term. Trump traveled to Beijing earlier this year as tensions between the world’s two largest economies escalated.

Verum reported Friday that JPMorgan Chase

The Washington summit is expected to feature high-stakes economic discussions as the United States and China remain locked in competition.

In addition to AI, the summit is likely to address trade and tariffs. One central element of the current U.S.-China trade truce—the suspension by Washington of increased reciprocal tariffs on imports from China—is due to expire on Nov. 10.

The existing truce includes Chinese pledges concerning rare-earth exports and U.S. agricultural purchases, while the Trump administration lowered certain tariffs and suspended higher reciprocal duties on Chinese goods.

Continue Reading

Technologies

As Fed raises rates, income investors can buy these bonds for solid yields and a portfolio cushion

Where the experts are finding income opportunities now that the Fed has increased rates.

It could be a good time for investors to lock in attractive income in bonds, although selectivity is key. The Federal Reserve hiked interest rates on Wednesday, bringing the fed funds rate to 3.75% to 4%. It also signaled one more increase by the end of the year. While the 10-year Treasury yield initially moved above 5% after the announcement, it was slightly lower Thursday at around 4.95%. Bond yields move inversely to prices. “I’m not sure we’ve seen the top in yields,” said Brian Rehling, co-head of global fixed income and digital asset strategy at Wells Fargo Investment Institute. “I think the Fed probably has more work to do.” Bond yields, particularly on the 10- and 30-year Treasurys, had already been moving higher prior to the Fed decision, thanks to concerns about inflation, bond supply from artificial intelligence companies and the rising government deficit. Investors seeking total return, which includes price appreciation and income, may want to stick with equities right now since bond yields are expected to move higher, said Rehling. However, income-seeking investors can snap up some solid yields. “If you don’t care as much about the market price movement, and you can pick up 5%-plus yield 
 in investment grade or high yield [bonds],” he said, “that’s attractive because even if you have some price deterioration, you do have the coupon that cushions your total return.” Matthew Palazzolo, senior investment strategist at Bernstein Private Wealth Management, also thinks the recent move higher in Treasury yields is a great opportunity for income investors. “That just pushes up overall rates and provides them with a nicer amount of income. And importantly, and as we’ve been saying for our clients, this provides an attractive entry point,” he said. Income opportunities Investment-grade corporate bonds make a lot of sense right now because the economy is expected to continue doing well and corporate fundamentals remain strong, Rehling said. Investors can also add some exposure to high-yield, but they should stick with higher-rated companies since the elevated yields are going to be a drag on the weakest names, he added. He would also stay with shorter-maturity bonds, two years or less — and no more than five years. For its part, the UBS chief investment office sees select opportunities across regions and market segments. “Investors should calibrate both credit risk and duration to their objectives and investment horizons,” wrote Ulrike Hoffmann-Burchardi, chief investment officer for the Americas and global head of equities at UBS Financial Services. He suggests investors consider selectively adding duration in high-quality bonds. “Alongside attractive income, these securities have scope for price gains if tighter monetary policy slows growth or reduces longer-term inflation expectations, leading yields to decline” as bond prices rise, he said. Investment-grade corporates offer attractive income at intermediate maturities, while higher-risk credit — such as high-yield and emerging market bonds — should have short-dated exposure, he added. Tax-free yields This is also a good time to buy municipal bonds, said Bernstein’s Palazzolo. Munis are free of federal tax, and, if the holder lives in the state in which the bond is issued, exempt from state taxes as well. “To buy municipals here, yielding the levels that they are, [you are] not only starting with a nice beginning level of income, but even if rates begin to move higher still, you’re protected against that duration because you’re collecting a good amount of income,” he explained. He tends to favor muni portfolios that have a duration of about six years, with nice income and little interest-rate sensitivity. No ‘immediate’ return to 60/40 In addition to income, bonds may also provide ballast in broader portfolio. “Higher starting yields reinforce bonds’ role as a key source of portfolio income, while high-quality bonds can provide valuable diversification if economic growth slows,” Hoffmann-Burchardi at UBS said. Goldman Sachs is wary of the 10-year Treasury right now and doesn’t see an immediate return to a traditional 60/40 portfolio. “We see a case for a return to more ‘normal’ strategic bond allocations but the tactical case for adding long-dated bonds is mixed,” Goldman analyst Christian Mueller-Glissmann said in a note Thursday. Energy bottlenecks and central bank policy will likely drive both bonds and stocks in the near term, with rate relief supporting both but yield increases weighing more on equities. “That said, over longer horizons, higher starting yields should lift optimal bond allocations from the unusually low levels of the past five years towards historical norms,” he wrote.

This site is now part of Versant. By continuing to use this service, you agree to our Terms. You also acknowledge that our updated Privacy Policy applies, including to your existing data. For details on your data rights, click here.

On this service, we and our vendors use cookies and other tools (“Cookies”) to store and access information on your device, such as device identifiers, IP address, and your browser type. You can access a list of all our potential 1021 vendors by selecting “IAB and Google Vendors,” although we may work with only a small selection of these on this service. Your data may be used to save and communicate your privacy choices; ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug our products and services; personalize advertising and content; for advertising and content measurement; to conduct audience research and services development; so we can improve our services and develop new ones; to match and combine offline data with your online activity; and for social features. We may share this data with select vendors with your consent.

Click “I Accept”, to consent to our use of these Cookies or “Reject All” to reject our use of these Cookies. Click “Manage Choices” to set your preferences. If you previously made choices with respect to Versant’s use of Cookies on this browser and device, you will need to update them. You can adjust your choices any time through the “Cookie Preferences” link in the footer of relevant Versant sites or in-app settings. Visit our Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more.

We will also use other Cookies that are essential or related to our services, including for security and fraud prevention.

Store and/or access information on a device. Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development.

– Your Privacy

– Strictly Necessary

– Save and communicate privacy choices 516 partners can use this special purpose

– Ensure security, prevent and detect fraud, and fix errors 651 partners can use this special purpose

– Deliver and present advertising and content 639 partners can use this special purpose

– Store and/or access information on a device 847 partners can use this purpose

– Personalised advertising and content, advertising and content measurement, audience research and services development 988 partners can use this purpose

– Targeted Advertising

– Content Selection

On this service, we and our vendors use cookies and other tools (“Cookies”) to store and access information on your device, such as device identifiers, IP address, and your browser type. Your data may be used to save and communicate your privacy choices; ensure security, prevent fraud, and debug our products and services; personalize advertising and content; for advertising and content measurement; to conduct audience research and services development; so we can improve our services and develop new ones; to match and combine offline data with your online activity; and for social features. We may share this data with select vendors with your consent. You can adjust your choices any time through the “Cookie Preferences” link in the footer of relevant Versant sites or in-app settings.

We will also use other Cookies that are essential or related to our services, including for security and fraud prevention. To learn more about some of our vendors, see the IAB and Google Vendors under each purpose. Visit our Cookie Notice and Privacy Policy to learn more.

Always Active

These Cookies and SDKs are required for Service functionality, including security and fraud prevention, and to enable any purchasing capabilities. You can set your browser to block these tracking technologies, but some parts of the site may not function properly.

The choices you make regarding the purposes and entities listed in this notice are saved and made available to those entities in the form of digital signals (such as a string of characters). This is necessary in order to enable both this service and those entities to respect such choices.

Your data can be used to monitor for and prevent unusual and possibly fraudulent activity (for example, regarding advertising, ad clicks by bots), and ensure systems and processes work properly and securely. It can also be used to correct any problems you, the publisher or the advertiser may encounter in the delivery of content and ads and in your interaction with them.

Certain information (like an IP address or device capabilities) is used to ensure the technical compatibility of the content or advertising, and to facilitate the transmission of the content or ad to your device.

Cookies, device or similar online identifiers (e.g. login-based identifiers, randomly assigned identifiers, network based identifiers) together with other information (e.g. browser type and information, language, screen size, supported technologies etc.) can be stored or read on your device to recognise it each time it connects to an app or to a website, for one or several of the purposes presented here.

– Use limited data to select advertising 787 partners can use this purposeAdvertising presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times an ad is presented to you).

– Create profiles for personalised advertising 633 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service (such as forms you submit, content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (for example, information from your previous activity on this service and other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (that might include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present advertising that appears more relevant based on your possible interests by this and other entities.

– Use profiles to select personalised advertising 637 partners can use this purposeAdvertising presented to you on this service can be based on your advertising profiles, which can reflect your activity on this service or other websites or apps (like the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects.

– Create profiles to personalise content 259 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service (for instance, forms you submit, non-advertising content you look at) can be stored and combined with other information about you (such as your previous activity on this service or other websites or apps) or similar users. This is then used to build or improve a profile about you (which might for example include possible interests and personal aspects). Your profile can be used (also later) to present content that appears more relevant based on your possible interests, such as by adapting the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find content that matches your interests.

– Use profiles to select personalised content 231 partners can use this purposeContent presented to you on this service can be based on your content personalisation profiles, which can reflect your activity on this or other services (for instance, the forms you submit, content you look at), possible interests and personal aspects. This can for example be used to adapt the order in which content is shown to you, so that it is even easier for you to find (non-advertising) content that matches your interests.

– Measure advertising performance 912 partners can use this purposeInformation regarding which advertising is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine how well an advert has worked for you or other users and whether the goals of the advertising were reached. For instance, whether you saw an ad, whether you clicked on it, whether it led you to buy a product or visit a website, etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of advertising campaigns.

– Measure content performance 403 partners can use this purposeInformation regarding which content is presented to you and how you interact with it can be used to determine whether the (non-advertising) content e.g. reached its intended audience and matched your interests. For instance, whether you read an article, watch a video, listen to a podcast or look at a product description, how long you spent on this service and the web pages you visit etc. This is very helpful to understand the relevance of (non-advertising) content that is shown to you.

– Understand audiences through statistics or combinations of data from different sources 575 partners can use this purposeReports can be generated based on the combination of data sets (like user profiles, statistics, market research, analytics data) regarding your interactions and those of other users with advertising or (non-advertising) content to identify common characteristics (for instance, to determine which target audiences are more receptive to an ad campaign or to certain contents).

– Develop and improve services 683 partners can use this purposeInformation about your activity on this service, such as your interaction with ads or content, can be very helpful to improve products and services and to build new products and services based on user interactions, the type of audience, etc. This specific purpose does not include the development or improvement of user profiles and identifiers.

– Use limited data to select content 179 partners can use this purposeContent presented to you on this service can be based on limited data, such as the website or app you are using, your non-precise location, your device type, or which content you are (or have been) interacting with (for example, to limit the number of times a video or an article is presented to you).

These Cookies and SDKs are used to collect data about your browsing habits, use of the Services, your preferences, and your interaction with advertisements across platforms and devices for the purpose of delivering targeted advertising content, both on our Services and on third party sites. Third-party sites and services also use Targeting Cookies to deliver content, including advertisements relevant to your interests on the Services. If you reject these Cookies or SDKs, you will see less relevant advertising.

Data collected under this category through Cookies and SDKs can also be used to select and deliver personalized content, such as news articles and videos.

Consent Leg.Interest

label

Continue Reading

Technologies

Trump to be sued by MS NOW, CNN, Politico to reverse White House ban

President Trump cited what he called “cumulative stories” by the three media outlets for his ban of them, saying, “You get sick of it.”

MS NOW, CNN and Politico are set to sue President Donald Trump on Monday morning and to ask a federal judge to reverse his total ban on those three media outlets from the White House.

Journalists from the outlets were prevented from entering the White House on Saturday, a day after Trump announced he would bar them from working there.

“This ban could not be a more direct assault on the First Amendment nor a more blatant violation of our most fundamental constitutional principles,” the lawsuit says.

“Presidents from the earliest days of the Republic have disagreed with and complained about the tenor and content of press coverage of their administrations,” the complaint, set to be filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, notes.

But “the Constitution protects the liberty and property interests that news organizations and White House reporters have in their press credentials and the access those credentials afford them to cover the White House for the benefit of the public,” the suit says. “No official can deprive Plaintiffs of those interests on a whim — with no notice, no process, and no warning—as the President did here.”

Trump, in announcing the ban on Friday accused the outlets of writing fiction and lies about him, and warned, “Other Fake News Media Outlets to follow,” in a Truth Social post announcing the ban. The president cited what he called “cumulative stories” by the three news organizations, adding, “You get sick of it.”

In a joint statement on Monday, the three outlets said, “This morning, we notified the government that we are filing a lawsuit today to protect our First Amendment rights and defend the principle that the government does not decide what the press reports or publishes.”

Without notice or process, the White House revoked our journalists’ credentials because it objected to our reporting,” the statement said. “Left unchallenged, this threatens press freedom and the public’s right to independent journalism free from government interference.”

The three outlets will file a joint motion asking a judge to issue a temporary restraining order barring Trump and other defendants from taking any more action to enforce the ban, and requiring them to immediately restore so-called hard pass press credentials to the plaintiffs giving their reporters access to the White House.

In addition to Trump, the defendants are his assistant for communications, Steven Cheung, White House Chief of Staff Susan Wiles, and Sean Curran, director of the U.S. Secret Service.

On Sunday night, the White House removed CNN from its scheduled rotation as the pool network for the White House travel pool. The pool is set to travel Monday with Trump for his visit to New York for the United Nations General Assembly.

The suit is being filed in the same court where The Associated Press has a pending lawsuit against the White House for a ban on that wire service’s journalists working in certain restricted spaces in the White House, including the Oval Office and on Air Force One. The White House’s partial ban on the AP came in February 2025 after the wire service refused to reflect Trump’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America in how it routinely refers to that international body of water.

Trump told reporters on Friday that the latest ban is worth implementing, even if it is overturned by a judge.

“I think it’s good to point it out, whether it survives or doesn’t,” he said.

The Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, in a statement after Trump’s announcement, suggested he would lose a legal challenge to the ban because of the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment protections for the media.

“The First Amendment prohibits the president from punishing journalists because he doesn’t like their coverage, just as it prohibits him from punishing universities because he doesn’t like the courses they offer, or from punishing law firms because he doesn’t like the clients they represent,” said Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the institute.

“With so many courts having ruled against him on exactly this point, you’d think President Trump would have learned this lesson by now,” Jaffer said.

MS NOW, in a statement Saturday, had said, “The White House belongs to the American people and the decisions made inside are funded by our tax dollars.”

“MS NOW intends to take any and all steps necessary to defend our First Amendment rights and the essential role of independent journalism in our democracy,” the network said. MS NOW also vowed to “continue to report on the President, the administration, and the issues that impact the American people.”

CNN and Politico issued similar statements, which referred to their constitutional right to report news without government interference.

White House Correspondents’ Association President Jacqui Heinrich, in a statement Saturday, said, “The American people, through a free and independent press, must be able to scrutinize those elected to power, regardless of whether government officials view it favorably.”

“That’s why courts have repeatedly held that once the White House provides access to journalists, it cannot deny that access arbitrarily or based on the content of their reporting,” Heinrich, a Fox News correspondent, said.

In the AP’s lawsuit, Judge Trevor McFadden ruled in April 2025 that Trump’s partial ban of the agency’s journalists violated the First Amendment and ordered that the AP be given the same access as other members of the presidential press pool to the Oval Office, other restricted areas of the White House and Air Force One.

“The Court simply holds that under the First Amendment, if the Government opens its doors to some journalists — be it to the Oval Office, the East Room, or elsewhere — it cannot then shut those doors to other journalists because of their viewpoints,” wrote McFadden, who was appointed to the federal bench by Trump.

“The Constitution requires no less,” the judge said.

Rather than allowing The Associated Press access to places the White House press pool goes to cover the president, the White House said it would abolish the so-called wire pool, which included the AP, Bloomberg and Reuters. The wire pool for decades had traveled with presidents to bring news coverage to news consumers around the world. It has not been reinstated.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in a 2-1 vote in June 2025, blocked McFadden’s ruling from taking effect while Trump appealed it.

The panel heard oral arguments in the appeal in November, but has not issued a decision.

This is breaking news. Check back for updates.

Disclosure: CNBC and MS NOW are divisions of Versant Media.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media