Technologies
No Matter What Happens at WWDC Today, I’m Never Using This AI Feature on My iPhone 16
Commentary: I’m an AI reporter, and this one AI feature on my iPhone 16 drove me bananas. So, no matter what Apple announces regarding Apple Intelligence at today’s developers event, I’m never turning it back on.
I was ridiculously excited to upgrade to an iPhone 16 last fall. After spending five years with my well-loved, but outdated iPhone 11, I was ready for all the usual perks: a better battery life, nicer cameras and (particularly exciting for me) a Barbie pink hue. What I didn’t expect was that my iPhone 16 would come with not one, but two new buttons: action and camera control. And one of these would absolutely rain on my parade.
The action button is a small button above the volume adjusters. It was introduced with the iPhone 15 Pro models and is a customizable button that can do anything from turning your ringer on to ordering your Dunkin’ coffee to-go. It’s small, demure and minds its own business.
It’s the camera control button that causes all the chaos.
Camera control is a new button on the iPhone 16 lineup that does what the name suggests: it controls your camera. It’s meant to help you quickly snap photos and serves as a shortcut to launching your camera app. You can slide your finger through a mini settings menu to adjust your camera’s zoom, among other things. But there’s one true reason for the button’s existence: AI.
Like every other tech company, Apple has been heavily investing in artificial intelligence. We’re expecting next week’s Worldwide Developers Conference to highlight any progress the company’s made since it debuted its suite of Apple Intelligence features last year, and to detail what role AI will play in the next generation of its software and hardware.
Apple Intelligence has been the driving force behind much of the company’s innovation. The camera control button, for instance, is the physical pathway into Visual Intelligence, a new AI-powered feature that lets you use your camera to scan objects in the real world to get more information on them. It sounds snazzy, but it’s completely pointless to me, and it’s a feature I have never been enticed to use.
There are other use cases for the camera control button, including ways to customize your button’s settings, as my colleagues have found through their testing. But that doesn’t change the fact that the camera control button is so completely annoying.
It’s a long button, about the size of the power button, located on the lower right side of the device. And it’s very, very easy to tap by accident. I’ve opened my camera while putting my phone in my pocket, while I’m driving and using navigation apps and once as I was turning off my phone for the night, which left the camera app open the whole night and drained my phone’s battery.
And if that wasn’t annoying enough, every time I actually intended to open my camera via camera control, it took several taps to do so. Go figure.
While I had camera control enabled, my camera roll included stunning shots like these:
I ask you: What is the point of a button that works when you don’t need it and doesn’t work when you do? There are already three ways to access your iPhone’s camera from the lock screen that take literal seconds to use. Camera control is a very expensive, very unreliable addition to the iPhone 16, all for the sake of AI features that many people don’t need or use. There hasn’t been one moment since I turned camera control off that I’ve missed it. So even if Apple announces some huge Visual Intelligence updates at WWDC next week, there’s no way I’m voluntarily turning it back on.
I realize my gripes with camera control are minor complaints among what has been an overall positive experience with my new phone. But as an AI reporter, I can’t help but see this as a troubling sign. So many tech companies have overhauled their software and devices to be AI-friendly, whether it’s Google spamming us with Gemini pop-ups in every single Google app, the new Copilot button on Microsoft Windows laptops or Apple’s camera control button.
Tech companies are too eager to get on the AI train and haven’t given enough thought to whether those features enhance or just derail our experience using their products. And not enough offer opt-out options. Thankfully for me and my camera roll, Apple does. But I hope in the future, such drastic measures won’t be necessary as companies are more intentional with their AI-enabling features.
If you want to join me in making your camera control button obsolete, you can navigate to your iPhone’s settings and select camera. Then, tap camera control. Within camera control select accessibility, and then toggle off camera control. If you’re also experiencing the hyper-sensitivity, you can adjust how many taps (and the pressure needed) to trigger the button in that same accessibility page under light-press force.
For more, check out our hands-on experience with the iPhone 16 Pro and our iOS 19 wish list.
Technologies
Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Saturday, March 14
Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for March 14.
Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.
Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? It’s the extra-long Saturday version, and a few of the clues are tricky. Read on for all the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.
If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.
Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword
Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.
Mini across clues and answers
1A clue: Book parts: Abbr.
Answer: PGS
4A clue: Silicon Valley company that operates a fleet of robotaxis
Answer: WAYMO
6A clue: To a much greater degree
Answer: WAYMORE
8A clue: Contents of a scuba diver’s tank
Answer: AIR
9A clue: South Korean automaker
Answer: KIA
10A clue: Stop on a train route
Answer: STATION
12A clue: Actress Merman of «Anything Goes»
Answer: ETHEL
13A clue: Find another purpose for
Answer: REUSE
Mini down clues and answers
1D clue: Employee’s hourly calculation
Answer: PAYRATE
2D clue: Workout spot
Answer: GYM
3D clue: «Great» mountains of Tennessee, familiarly
Answer: SMOKIES
4D clue: One giving you the dish?
Answer: WAITER
5D clue: Baltimore M.L.B. player
Answer: ORIOLE
6D clue: Used to be
Answer: WAS
7D clue: Suffix with Caesar or Euclid
Answer: EAN
11D clue: Night that NBC once aired «30 Rock» and «The Office»: Abbr.
Answer: THU
Technologies
AI Toys Can Pose Safety Concerns for Children, New Study Suggests Caution
When one child told the toy, «I love you,» it responded, «As a friendly reminder, please ensure interactions adhere to the guidelines provided.»
A new study from the University of Cambridge found that AI-enabled toys for young children can misinterpret emotional cues and are ineffective at supporting critical developmental play. The conclusions could be concerning for parents.
In one report examining how AI affects children in their early years, a chatbot-enabled toy struggled to recognize social cues during playtime. Researchers found that the toy did not effectively identify children’s emotions, raising alarm about how kids might interact with it.
The report recommends regulating AI toys for kids and requiring clear labeling of their capabilities and privacy policies. It also advises parents to keep these devices in shared spaces where kids can be monitored while playing.
The research behind the study had a limited number of participants, but was done in multiple parts: an online survey of 39 participants with kids in their earlier years, a focus group with nine participants who work with young children and an in-person workshop with 19 leaders and representatives from charities that work with early-years kids. That was followed by monitored playtime with 14 children and 11 parents or guardians with Gabbo, a chatbot-enabled toy from Curio Interactive.
Some findings indicated that the AI toy supported learning, particularly in language and communication skills. But the toy also misunderstood kids and sometimes responded inappropriately to emotional requests.
For instance, when one child told the toy, «I love you,» it responded, «As a friendly reminder, please ensure interactions adhere to the guidelines provided. Let me know how you would like to proceed,» according to the research.
Jenny Gibson, a professor of neurodiversity and developmental psychology at the Faculty of Education at Cambridge, who worked on the study, said that while parents may be excited about the educational benefits of new technology aimed at children, there are plenty of concerns.
Gibson posed overarching questions about the reason behind the tech.
«What would motivate [tech investors] to do the right thing by children … to put children ahead of profits? she said»
Gibson told CNET that while researchers are exploring the potential benefits of AI-based toys, risks remain.
«I would advise parents to take that seriously at this stage,» she said.
What’s next for AI toys
As more playthings are enabled with internet connectivity and AI features, these devices could become a major safety risk for children, especially if they replace real human connections or if interactions are not closely monitored.
Meanwhile, younger people are increasingly adopting chatbots such as ChatGPT, despite red flags. Multiple lawsuits against AI companies allege that AI companions or assistants can impact young people’s psychological safety, including some chatbots that have encouraged self-harm or negative self-image.
AI companies such as OpenAI and Google have responded by adding guardrails and restrictions for AI chatbots.
(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in 2025 filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)
Gibson said she was surprised by the enthusiasm some parents showed for AI toys. She was also alarmed by the lack of research on AI’s effects on young children, noting that companies making such products should work directly with children, parents, and child development experts.
«What’s missing in the process is that expertise of what is good for children in these kinds of interactions,» she said.
Curio Interactive, the company behind the Gabbo toy, was aware of the research as it was happening but was not directly involved, Gibson said. The toy was chosen because it’s directly marketed to young kids, and the company had an understandable privacy policy. Gibson said the company seemed supportive of the project.
A representative for Curio did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Technologies
Two Lost ‘Doctor Who’ Episodes Found Intact in Waterlogged Collection
The 1960s episodes featuring the first Doctor William Hartnell will air in the UK in April.
Whovians, rejoice. The BBC is about to unlock a piece of Doctor Who history that even the TARDIS might have forgotten. Two lost episodes of Doctor Who, the iconic sci-fi series, will broadcast in April, the showrunner for the current season confirmed.
The two 1965 episodes, The Nightmare Begins and Devil’s Planet, were donated to the charitable trust Film Is Fabulous by the estate of an anonymous collector.
«The collector did recognize what he had, but how he acquired them has been lost to time,» Professor Justin Smith Leicester of De Montfort University, who led the recovery effort, told the broadcaster.
The researchers said that while most of the donor’s private collection was destroyed by water damage, the Doctor Who episodes were intact.
Doctor Who showrunner, Russell T Davies, celebrated the news on Instagram and said the episodes would air in the UK in April, though no US air date has been announced yet.
«Lost for 61 years! Best of all, these will be made available for FREE on the BBC iPlayer in April,» Davies wrote.
He expressed gratitude to Film Is Fabulous for finding the lost episodes and encouraged people to donate to the registered charity. «Maybe they’ll find more! As the Doctor says… ‘Daleks!'»
The episodes feature the first incarnation of the Doctor, played by William Hartnell, and a typical Dalek plot to take over Earth and the galaxy.
In the 1960s and 1970s, the BBC had a policy of destroying film or reusing videotapes, leading to dozens of episodes of Doctor Who and other popular UK shows like Dad’s Army and Top of the Pops going missing.
Old Doctor Who episodes do surface occasionally, and in 2016, the newly discovered soundtrack for one storyline was turned into an animated series called The Power of the Daleks.
Meanwhile, Disney ended its working relationship with the BBC last year, and star Ncuti Gatwa left the show. However, the UK broadcaster says that Doctor Who will continue, and Russell T Davies is working on a new Christmas special.
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
-
Technologies4 года agoiPhone 13 event: How to watch Apple’s big announcement tomorrow
