Technologies
I Avoided Using a Sports Watch Until I Tested This One by Garmin
Garmin Venu 4 Review: It’s the best-looking sports watch I’ve tested, with all the fitness metrics you need to level up your training, for a price.
Pros
- Week-long battery life in smartwatch mode
- Polished circular design
- Advanced fitness and recovery metrics
Cons
- $100 more than previous generation
- Software can feel sluggish
- UI is not as intuitive as other smart watches
Until the Garmin Venu 4 landed on my wrist, I mostly shied away from using dedicated sports watches from brands like Garmin or Polar as my daily driver. Part of that was imposter syndrome; I’m a fitness enthusiast, not a full-blown athlete (yet). But mostly, I wasn’t willing to accept the trade-offs that came with them: clunky software, limited smart features and designs that felt more like gym gear than something I’d want to wear all day.
The Venu 4 isn’t the only good-looking sports watch on the market, but it’s the first one that’s come close to convincing me to go all-in. It’s well-rounded (literally and figuratively) and packed with fitness features that don’t feel condescending to an athlete wannabe like me.
The line between sports watches and traditional smartwatches seems to get blurrier each year. Both Apple and Samsung now have rugged Ultra smartwatch lines, and sports watches are starting to look (and act) more like traditional smartwatches.
The Venu 4 feels like Garmin’s strongest attempt yet to bridge these two worlds. It goes all out on fitness features with advanced insights like training readiness and suggested workouts typically reserved for the top-tier Fēnix models, but has a design and a price that are approachable for people who live somewhere between casual fitness enthusiast and aspiring athlete.
The $550 price (for both 41mm and 45mm models) is $100 more than its predecessor, and upgrading from the Venu 3 makes sense only if you plan to use the data it provides. If you’re someone who mostly just wants the occasional workout tracking, then the Venu 4 will be overkill.
I may not be a full convert (yet), but after weeks of living with it day and night with the Venu 4, I get the Garmin obsession, and I can see how a sports watch could help me level up my fitness journey when I’m ready.
Venu 4 fitness: Garmin’s core strength
The Venu 4 supports what feels like every workout imaginable, from running and cycling to rowing, HIIT, and even golf course mapping. It supports multi-band GPS, which I found provided more accurate location tracking, even on trail runs without my phone. Heart rate tracking stayed impressively close to my Polar chest strap after the initial jump from resting to higher-intensity sprint.
Garmin’s strength isn’t just the sheer volume of data it collects, but how it helps you understand how those metrics impact your training. On the Venu 4, you get heart rate, breathing rate, blood oxygen, stress, ECG, skin temperature changes, HRV, and advanced sleep and menstrual cycle tracking.
On their own, these metrics can feel overwhelming or even meaningless. What Garmin does especially well is connect the dots through features like Body Battery, Training Readiness, Load and other recovery insights that translate raw data into a clearer picture of how prepared your body is for activity. And because you’re not constantly taking it off to charge, Garmin can build a more complete picture of your health and recovery that becomes more accurate over time.
I found waking up to a low Body Battery score when I felt off was both depressing and validating: no, I probably can’t just «shake this one off,» and yes, I should probably take a rest day (or two) before getting back to that New Year’s resolution.
The watch also highlights when you’re theoretically at your best to work out, even if real life doesn’t always cooperate. There’s no greater irony than seeing I’m in «peak» training readiness while rocking my toddler to sleep, or hustling to get a story in on time. That’s ultimately my biggest barrier to fully crossing over into the Garmin ecosystem. I’m not always in a position to follow the advice that makes these metrics most valuable.
Garmin Connect Plus subscribers ($7 per month) get access to personalized coaching plans and daily suggested workouts that adapt based on their sleep, recovery and activity history. I tried a running plan to prep for a 10K, but by day three, I’d gone rogue and settled back into my tired, but realistic, workout routine. Learning new routines takes time, and at this stage of life, 20-minute workouts squeezed between everything else will have to suffice.
Venu 4 battery life: Amazing for a smartwatch, but meh for a Garmin
The Venu 4’s shiny new upgrades (brighter display and improved GPS tracking over the Venu 3) come at a slight cost to battery life: You get 12 days on the Venu 4 versus 14 on the Venu 3. But I think it’s well worth it when you factor in everything else it has.
I averaged about 10 days of battery life per charge for the smaller 41mm Venu 4 that I tested. But that’s in smartwatch mode, which disables the always-on display. If, like me, you prefer the always-on display, battery life drops. I got roughly four days on a charge (slightly less on long hiking days when the GPS was running). It’s not quite multiweek endurance like Garmin’s Enduro or Instinct lines. But even at the lower end, the Venu 4 is still far better than most Apple and Samsung watches.
I’ve never worn a smartwatch this long without taking it off for a charge, which turns out can be both a good and a bad thing. On the plus side, it made sleep tracking more consistent, which is key to unlocking Garmin’s best features like Body Battery, HRV (heart rate variability) and recovery insights. Wearing the watch for so long is also important for identifying long-term health trends and detecting early signs of illness.
The flip side of wearing it nonstop was skin irritation. After about five straight days, the skin directly under the watch became red and itchy. I tried to power through it, which only made things worse. A perfect storm of winter weather, a suppressed immune system, and the polymer backing on the underside of the watch likely didn’t help matters. After taking a week off, cleaning it more regularly, and giving my skin the occasional break, the issue hasn’t returned. And if you have sensitive skin like me, it’s probably worth building in a little breathing room.
Venu 4 design: Not your average sports watch
The Venu 4 is hands down one of the best-looking watches I’ve tested (Note: I didn’t say sports watches). It even earned its fair share of compliments from friends who didn’t know it was a sports watch. The Venu 4 comes in two sizes, 41mm and 45mm, both with a 1.4-inch AMOLED screen and a stainless steel case in lunar gold, slate, or silver finishes. It’s covered in Gorilla Glass 3 and has a fiber-reinforced polymer back.
The bezels are larger than those on an Apple Watch Series 11, and the usable screen area feels smaller than expected. The Venu 4’s display is bright and legible even in direct sunlight. You might not find it as responsive to touch if you’re coming from an LTPO OLED or Super AMOLED display with a higher refresh rate, like those on Apple or Samsung watches. Which is why the physical button navigation is so important.
Garmin slimmed the design down to two physical buttons (the Venu 3 had 3). One button brings up navigation, while the other handles quick settings. Long-pressing the bottom button activates other actions, like the flashlight, but until muscle memory kicks in, it’s easy to forget which one does what.
The built-in LED flashlight is a standout feature. It’s an actual light embedded in the side of the watch, not a screen-based workaround like found on other smartwatches. It’s surprisingly powerful and incredibly useful, whether you’re doing an ultramarathon or, in my case, checking on a sleeping kid without turning on any lights.
Venu 4 watch basics: Functional, but not seamless
On paper, the Venu 4 checks most of the smartwatch boxes. It has notifications, mobile payments via Garmin Pay, music storage, voice assistant access (via your phone) and supports calls from your wrist. Android phone owners get the added perk of responding to texts from the watch; iPhone owners are out of luck.
In my testing, this is where Garmin still lags behind true smartwatches. Everything works, but it’s not seamless; simple actions often take more steps than they should, and Garmin’s app ecosystem remains limited. Even changing your watch face requires an additional phone app (Garmin IQ). The upside is cross-platform compatibility, and aside from the ability to respond to texts, the experience is consistent across iOS and Android.
Venu 4 accessibility features
Garmin has also added more accessibility options in the Venu 4. There are spoken watch faces that read out time and health data, hourly audio alerts, and multiple color filters for people with color blindness.
Venu 4: Final thoughts
I’m still a practical generalist in the throes of working motherhood, but the Garmin Venu 4 is the closest I’ve been to going full sports watch. If I were ready to make fitness a true priority, the Venu 4 would be my gateway Garmin watch.
It’s a solid pick for anyone looking to cross over into the sports watch world for the first time, and it’s one of Garmin’s most well-rounded options. The Venu 4 has enough battery to get you through the week, training insights that feel genuinely helpful rather than overwhelming, and a design that’s polished enough to pass for date-night-ready.
Technologies
Apple Needs to Launch Its Foldable iPhone Flip in 2026. Here’s Why
Commentary: Foldables are everywhere now and Apple is the only major phone-maker without one.
I love Apple’s flagship cosmic orange iPhone 17 Pro — even when I managed to turn mine pink — but I was disappointed not to see the company’s long-rumored foldable iPhone Flip. Pretty much every major Android phone-maker, including Samsung, Google, Motorola, OnePlus, Xiaomi and Honor are now multiple generations into their own folding phone lineups, with the hardware continuing to become more and more refined with each revision. Oppo is now in its fifth year of foldables and its latest Find N6 is the result of those years of development. Apple isn’t even at step one yet and it’s beginning to feel like it’s late to the party. That might be a problem.
Apple dominates in the premium phone category, but foldables — which fit into the premium space in terms of price — are already nipping at its heels, with Motorola telling CNET that 20% of customers buying its Razr foldable jumped ship from Apple. Meanwhile, Samsung is in the seventh generation of its Flip and Fold series. As Lisa Eadicicco discovered during a visit to Seoul, «foldables are everywhere» in Samsung’s home country of South Korea.
With nearly every major Android phone-maker entering the foldable market, Apple risks losing potential customers. It also runs the risk of letting a rival like Samsung or Motorola becoming the go-to name for foldables, which could make it harder for Apple to make an impact if it eventually launches its own device. Furthermore, early adopters drawn to foldable tech may be too entrenched in the Android ecosystem by the time Apple’s phone arrives to want to switch to iOS.
Apple is unlikely to be worried. It’s estimated that around 20 million foldables from all manufacturers were sold worldwide in 2023, while Apple reportedly sold 26.5 million iPhone 14 Pro Max handsets in the first half of that year alone. In 2024, foldable sales were flat — and 2025 didn’t fare much better, according to analysts at CounterPoint Research, although Samsung did report record numbers of preorders for its most recent foldable. Clearly, Apple feels it has yet to miss the boat.
Apple has always found success in biding its time, observing the industry and launching its own take on a product when it’s ready. Apple didn’t invent phones, tablets, smartwatches or computers, but it found ways to take existing products and make them more useful, more valuable in day-to-day life and — dare I say — more exciting. It’s why the iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch and Mac lines dominate the market today.
For me, I need to see Apple’s take on the foldable phone. I’ve written before about how disappointed I am in foldables. I’ve been a mobile reporter for over 14 years and phones have become increasingly dull as they’ve converged to become slight variations on the same rectangular slab.
Read more: Best Flip Phone for 2026
Foldables promised something new, something innovative, something that briefly sparked some excitement in me, but years in, that excitement has dwindled to the point of being extinguished. They are fine products and while I like the novelty of a screen that bends, they’re not a revolution in how we interact with our phones. Not in the way that the arrival of the touchscreen was when we were still pushing buttons to type out texts.
I did hope that Google’s Pixel Fold would be the phone to catapult the foldable forward, and while the recent Pixel 10 Pro Fold — the second generation of Google’s foldable — does offer some great updates, it still doesn’t offer any kind of revolution. Instead, it feels more like a «me too» move from Google. Ditto for the OnePlus Open. So I’m left instead to look toward Apple, a company with a track record for product revolutions, to create a new take on the genre that genuinely drives forward how we use our phones.
That innovation won’t just come from the product design. Apple works closely with its third-party software developers, and it’s that input that would help a folding iPhone become genuinely useful. My biggest complaint around foldables right now is that while the hardware is decent, the devices are essentially just running standard versions of Android with a handful of UI tweaks thrown in. They’re just regular phones that just happen to bend.
Few Android developers are embracing the folding format, and it’s not difficult to see why; the users aren’t there in sufficient numbers yet to justify the time and expense to adapt their software across a variety of screen sizes. The multiple folding formats already available mean Android foldables face the same fragmentation issue that has plagued the platform since the beginning. Android-based foldables are simply a more difficult platform for developers to build for than regular phones. Apple would be able to change that, as it proved with the iPhone and iPad.
Given Apple’s close relationships with top-tier developers — not to mention its own vast developer team — I expect an eventual Apple foldable to offer innovations that make it more than just an iPhone that folds in half.
And I truly hope it does. I want to look forward to tech launches again. I want to feel excited to get a new gadget in my hands and feel that «wow» moment as I do something transformative for the first time.
In short, I don’t want to be bored by technology anymore. Apple, it’s over to you.
Technologies
Verum Messenger Goes Desktop: Launches macOS Version as Part of Expanding Digital Ecosystem
Verum Messenger Goes Desktop: Launches macOS Version as Part of Expanding Digital Ecosystem
The team behind Verum Messenger has announced a new update, introducing a full-featured macOS version of the application.
The launch of the Mac version marks a significant step in the platform’s development, enabling users to access Verum Messenger not only on mobile devices but also on desktop environments.
The macOS version ensures seamless synchronization across devices while maintaining the platform’s core principles: security, stability, and independence.
Unified Digital Experience
With the release of the macOS version, users can now:
— communicate on a larger screen
— manage chats and files more efficiently
— use the messenger in a full desktop environment
— access core features without limitations
This is particularly valuable for users who rely on messaging platforms for both communication and professional use.
Expanding Capabilities
Verum Messenger continues to evolve into a multifunctional platform combining:
— secure communication
— financial tools (Verum Finance)
— digital asset operations, including Tether
— investment features such as Verum Gold
Toward a Full Ecosystem
The macOS release reflects Verum Messenger’s strategy to become a universal digital platform available across all major devices.
According to the team, the goal is to provide users with continuous access to communication and financial services regardless of device or environment.
Verum Messenger continues to build technologies focused on security, usability, and global accessibility.
Technologies
Google, Meta and Amazon Join Global Pact to Fight Rising Online Scams
The companies will share fraud intelligence and coordinate responses as AI makes scams faster, cheaper and harder to detect.
Modern online scams operate across multiple platforms, perhaps spanning social media, messaging apps, email and online marketplaces. Google, Meta and Amazon are among 11 tech, retail and payments companies that have signed a new agreement to combat online scams by sharing threat intelligence across platforms, Axios first reported Monday.
The initiative, called the Industry Accord Against Online Scams & Fraud, is designed to improve how companies detect and respond to fraud that spans multiple services. Participants say they will exchange signals, such as scam-linked accounts and fraudulent domains, and coordinate enforcement actions.
By sharing intelligence in near real time, companies hope to identify these scams earlier and stop them before they spread.
The effort reflects how modern scams operate. A victim might encounter a fake celebrity investment ad on social media, move to a messaging app where the scammer builds trust, then faces prompts to send money through a fraudulent website, payment app or crypto wallet — spanning multiple companies’ ecosystems.
Google said it now blocks hundreds of millions of scam-related results every day using AI, underscoring how both attackers and defenders are increasingly relying on the same technology. Meta removed more than 159 million scam ads in 2025 and is expanding AI tools to detect impersonation and warn users.
Online scams are growing rapidly, in part because generative AI has lowered the barrier to entry. AI can be used not only to produce realistic phishing emails but also to clone voices and deepfake videos that impersonate executives, public figures and even family members.
The agreement is voluntary and doesn’t create new legal obligations, but it comes after regulators’ increased pressure on tech platforms to address fraud more aggressively. The companies say they will begin building frameworks for reporting and intelligence-sharing, though it’s not yet clear how quickly those systems will be deployed or how effective they will be in practice.
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
-
Technologies5 лет agoiPhone 13 event: How to watch Apple’s big announcement tomorrow



