Connect with us

Technologies

The iPhone 17 Pro’s Cameras Take the Fight to the OnePlus 15, and There Are Bruises

Camera showdown: The OnePlus 15’s camera should have surprised me, but it really didn’t. Meanwhile, Apple’s iPhone 17 Pro keeps on delivering in terms of photography.

The OnePlus 15 impressed my excellent colleague, David Lumb, with its superb battery life and excellent performance, especially for gaming. I wasn’t as thrilled with the cameras in my early testing, but the proof of its photography prowess comes down to how it stacks up against the competition. In this case, the iPhone 17 Pro is one of our favorite phone cameras and indeed one of the best camera phones you can buy in 2025. 

For years, OnePlus has partnered with the iconic Swedish camera maker Hasselblad to work on color science and image calibration for OnePlus phones. But that partnership has ended, which puts a lot of pressure on the Chinese company to impress with its camera suite on the OnePlus 15. Throughout all these changes, Apple released the iPhone 17 Pro, which has a brand-new 48-megapixel 4x telephoto camera and carries forward the company’s reputation for excellent photography.

I headed out to the streets of Edinburgh, Scotland, to test both phone cameras in a variety of situations. It’s important to note, though, that what I consider «better» might not be what you agree with. Photography, like all art, is subjective. While, as aprofessional photographer, I prefer more natural, true-to-life tones, you may prefer imagery with more pop and colors. Take my thoughts with a grain of salt. 

Note, too, that all images were taken with each phone’s standard camera mode in JPEG format, and all images have been resized using Adobe Lightroom, with no additional edits or sharpening applied. Small print done with, let’s dive in.

Straight off the bat, I’ll admit a small mistake in the photos above. I took this shot using one of the iPhone’s Photographic Styles. I think it was Gold, and so it’s no surprise that it’s given the image a more vibrant, warmer look that suits the scene incredibly well. I only had the style active for this example and the ultrawide version below. 

However, I noticed that the iPhone’s exposure is broadly better, while the OnePlus’ software processing had worked so hard in reducing image noise that a lot of the texture in the floor had been lost. 

Switch to the ultrawide lenses, and things do change a bit. The iPhone’s exposure above looks preferable to my eye, but the OnePlus’ shot definitely has more detail overall.

This example above is quite classic of the problems I have not just with the OnePlus 15, but also with most of OnePlus’ phones. The image is quite heavily saturated, with an electric-blue sky and vivid greens that look unnatural to me. The iPhone’s image has a much better handle on color here.

My other problem with OnePlus’ phones is how hard they go with their HDR processing, brightening up shadows and pulling back highlights, resulting in images that quite often lack depth and believable contrast. The image above is a prime example where the deep shadows under this bridge have been maintained in the iPhone’s shot, but where the OnePlus 15 has tried to lighten them so much that the image looks very overprocessed.

And to prove it’s not a one-off, this example above is a real low point for the OnePlus. It really tried to eliminate any kind of shadows in this scene, while pulling back the highlights in the sky outside far too much. The image looks fake, overprocessed and exactly what people would think of if you told them a photo was taken on a phone. By taking a far more subtle approach, the iPhone’s image is much more to my liking. 

The OnePlus hasn’t gone as hard with its vendetta against shadows in the image above, but it does look like it’s ramped that saturation way up. It’s not that I don’t like vibrant colors — I do — it’s just that I want to add in that saturation should I want to, rather than having it forced on me by default. 

The images above show a more muted scene and a good effort from both phones. Although taken just nine seconds apart (I checked the metadata), I do think the sun may have slightly peeked out from behind a cloud a little more in the iPhone’s shot, as the front of the building does look quite a lot brighter. Or maybe the OnePlus is going hard on the HDR again. Who knows? Either way, good details on this image from both phones. 

The same scene in ultrawide does arguably look a little muted from the iPhone, at least when compared with the bold blue of the OnePlus’ shot above. Somewhere between the two would be my sweet spot. After I zoomed in on the details, the iPhone’s shot is certainly clearer, but at full screen — or on your Insta feed — that difference is negligible. 

That brightness and color difference persists when taking each phone to its maximum default telephoto zoom, so maybe it doesn’t have anything to do with the sun and clouds after all. Colors aside, the iPhone’s shot above is also clearer, and its details look sharp without being overly digitally sharpened. The OnePlus’ image does have something of a «crunchiness» to it from its software processing that I don’t like as much. 

Peeping close up at the pixels on each phone’s telephoto zoom shot, I definitely think the OnePlus has gone too hard with its sharpening in the image above of a person in a window.

I’m slightly more torn on this nighttime scene. The OnePlus shot above has yet again gone big on the saturation. Look at the overcooked green on the grass — it looks like it was taken at midday in the spring. The iPhone’s colors look way more natural. However, the OnePlus’ sharpening works in favor at night, delivering a shot with crisper details throughout.

And in ultrawide, I flat out prefer the OnePlus image above. Those vibrant tones look much better here, especially as they make the oranges of the building in the background stand out more.

And if we peep at those pixels again, it’s clear that the details on the OnePlus’ shot (left) are far better. Finally, a win for the OnePlus. 

This final indoor low-light scene is a bit more of a mixed bag. The OnePlus’ image above is unquestionably brighter — especially the people nearest the camera — but its noise reduction has gone a bit too hard in some areas, reducing textures on clothing and hair that the iPhone hasn’t done. Overall, though, I’d say this example is a close fight. 

iPhone 17 Pro vs. OnePlus 15: Which camera is better?

For me, it’s an easy victory for the iPhone 17 Pro. Almost across the board, its images are more natural looking with realistic colors, saturation levels and exposure. The OnePlus 15’s reliance on heavy-handed image processing has resulted in often garish-looking photos that are almost the opposite of what I look for in my photography. However, as I said at the beginning, that’s just my opinion. 

As a photographer, I want my camera — any camera — to be able to capture the best-looking image straight out of the camera that I can then apply more edits to if I want to. But maybe you don’t want to do that and instead want a vibrant, punchy-looking shot that you can immediately share to social media. If so, maybe the OnePlus will be fine for you. 

At the end of the day, deciding which phone to buy will come down to more than just the camera, so make sure to read CNET’s in-depth reviews of all of 2025’s best phones to decide which is the one for you.

Related Topics:

Technologies

Sam Altman’s World Initiative Expands Human Verification to Tinder and Beyond

Sam Altman’s World initiative expands its human verification technology, starting with a global rollout on Tinder and introducing new features like Concert Kit to combat scalpers and deepfakes.

At a popular spot near the San Francisco waterfront, Sam Altman’s verification project World marked its latest phase and ambitious growth. The initiative begins by partnering with Tinder.

Tools for Humanity (TFH), the firm driving the World project, revealed on Friday that it will embed its verification technology into dating platforms, event ticketing networks, corporate entities, email services, and various other sectors of daily life.

Image Credits:World

«The world is approaching incredibly advanced AI, which is accomplishing remarkable things,» Altman noted while addressing a full room at The Midway. «However, we are moving toward an era where AI-generated content will surpass human-created material,» he continued. «I am certain many of you [have experienced] moments where you question, ‘Am I communicating with an AI or a real person, or what is the ratio, and how can I verify?’»

World (previously known as Worldcoin) sets itself apart from other identity verification services by enabling the confirmation that a genuine, living individual is accessing a digital platform while maintaining their privacy. This relies on sophisticated cryptographic methods (specifically, «zero-knowledge proof-based authentication»). The result: The organization is developing what it terms «proof of human» solutions, which are systems designed to confirm human presence in an environment increasingly populated by AI agents and automated bots.

Its primary verification instrument is a spherical device named the Orb, which captures a user’s eye patterns to generate a distinct, anonymous cryptographic code (referred to as a verified World ID). This code can then be utilized to access World’s services, though individuals may also use the World application without possessing an Orb.

Altman’s speech on Friday was concise (TFH’s co-founder and CEO, Alex Blania, was missing due to unexpected hand surgery, according to Altman). He subsequently passed the presentation to World’s chief product officer, Tiago Sada, and his colleagues.

Sada detailed that World is introducing the latest iteration of its application (the previous release was unveiled during a December gathering), alongside numerous new technology integrations.

World has been working for a while to introduce a verification system for dating applications — particularly Tinder. Last year, Tinder initiated a World ID trial program in Japan. This trial reportedly succeeded, prompting World to announce that Tinder would roll out its verification integration across global markets, including the U.S. The system adds a World ID badge to the profiles of users who complete its verification steps, confirming their authenticity as real individuals.

Image Credits:World

World is also targeting the entertainment sector with a new feature called Concert Kit, allowing musicians to set aside specific ticket quantities for World ID-verified attendees. This aims to protect fans from scalpers who frequently employ automated ticket-purchasing bots to secure seats. Concert Kit works with major ticketing platforms like Ticketmaster and Eventbrite, and the company is highlighting it through collaborations with 30 Seconds to Mars and Bruno Mars — both of whom intend to utilize it for their upcoming tours.

The gathering featured numerous additional announcements, including those focused on corporate clients. A Zoom/World ID verification integration aims to counter a perceived deepfake risk in business calls, and a Docusign partnership is designed to ensure

Continue Reading

Technologies

From Acquisition Talks to Rivals: How Stripe and Airwallex’s Paths Diverged

Once on the verge of a $1.2 billion acquisition by Stripe, Airwallex founder Jack Zhang rejected the deal to pursue a long-term vision, now positioning the company as a formidable rival in the global payments infrastructure space.

Jack Zhang, a 34-year-old entrepreneur who had been leading his startup for three and a half years, found himself in a pivotal meeting with Michael Moritz, a prominent investor from Sequoia Capital. Invited to Moritz’s San Francisco residence, which offered stunning views of the Golden Gate Bridge, Zhang was presented with an offer: Stripe intended to acquire Airwallex for $1.2 billion. At that moment, Airwallex was generating approximately $2 million in annualized revenue, making the valuation seem incredibly lucrative. Moritz emphasized that Patrick Collison, Stripe’s founder, was a visionary leader, suggesting the acquisition could lead to extraordinary growth. Zhang spent two weeks in San Francisco grappling with the decision, eventually agreeing to the deal.

Yet, he soon flew back to Australia, nearly 8,000 miles away. Reflecting on the decision, Zhang explained, ‘I had to delve into my core motivations for building Airwallex. I was only three and a half years into the venture, which had grown exponentially in 2018. I had just begun to experience the thrill of entrepreneurship, which is what I had always dreamed of.’

Two of his co-founders opposed the acquisition, which influenced his choice. However, Zhang cited a clearer moment of clarity when he looked at the whiteboard in his office. The unfinished vision remained: to create financial infrastructure enabling businesses to operate globally as if they were local entities.

This decision appears increasingly justified. Airwallex now reports over $1.3 billion in annualized revenue, growing 85% annually, and processes nearly $300 billion in transaction volume. Zhang attributes this success to the deliberate challenges they faced.

Zhang’s journey began in Qingdao, China, and he moved to Melbourne at 15 with minimal English, living with a host family. After his family’s financial struggles, he worked multiple jobs to fund his computer science degree at the University of Melbourne, including bartending, dishwashing, gas station shifts, and farm work. He later worked in trading code development at an Australian investment bank, a role that paid well but lacked personal fulfillment.

Discover Your Next Investor or Portfolio Startup at Disrupt

Secure your next funding round, hire key talent, and seize emerging opportunities at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026. Join 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders for three days of 250+ tactical sessions, valuable connections, and groundbreaking innovation. Register now to save up to $410.

Discover Your Next Investor or Portfolio Startup at Disrupt

Secure your next funding round, hire key talent, and seize emerging opportunities at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026. Join 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders for three days of 250+ tactical sessions, valuable connections, and groundbreaking innovation. Register now to save up to $410.

Before founding Airwallex, Zhang launched approximately 10 ventures, including a magazine at 14, a real estate development firm, import-export businesses dealing in wine and olive oil between Australia and Asia, textiles in the opposite direction, and a burger chain.

The concept for Airwallex emerged while Zhang ran a Melbourne coffee shop. When attempting to pay suppliers in Brazil, Indonesia, and Guatemala, co-founder Max Li observed payments vanishing into correspondent banking systems, often flagged or frozen by U.S. intermediary banks enforcing OFAC sanctions. ‘This prompted me to investigate correspondent banking and SWIFT systems to build our own global money movement network,’ Zhang noted.

That vision has scaled significantly. Airwallex now holds nearly 90 financial licenses across 50 markets, far exceeding Stripe’s estimated half. Acquiring these licenses required immense effort; in Japan, it took seven years. In some emerging markets, the company acquired shell companies with outdated licenses and rebuilt their technology from scratch.

‘You can’t just vibe-code an integration with Mexico’s central bank,’ Zhang remarked. ‘Access requires a secure room and biometric scans.’ These licenses are not merely regulatory formalities. In Japan, for example, Stripe and Square must transfer funds immediately to merchants’ bank accounts, whereas Airwallex, holding a fund transfer operator license, retains funds within its ecosystem. This allows customers to issue bank accounts, cards, and spend locally without funds leaving the platform.

The foreign exchange advantages are significant. A U.S. merchant settling transactions in Australian dollars avoids the 2% to 3% conversion fees typically charged by processors like Stripe to move funds back to U.S. dollars. Instead, they can use local balances to pay vendors, manage payroll, and cover digital marketing at interbank rates.

‘You no longer operate like a traditional U.S. company,’ Zhang explained. ‘You function as a global entity without the need to physically establish offices worldwide.’ This strategic approach, which Zhang calls the ‘path of maximum resistance,’ has created competitive barriers. ‘It took us six and a half years to reach $100 million in annual recurring revenue,’ Zhang stated. ‘But after that, it took just over three years to hit a billion.’ The competitive logic, in his telling, is clear.

Continue Reading

Technologies

App Store Experiences a Resurgence, With AI as a Potential Catalyst

Contrary to predictions that AI would render mobile apps obsolete, new app launches are surging, with iOS seeing an 80% year-over-year increase in Q1 2026, potentially driven by AI lowering development barriers.

The narrative that artificial intelligence would spell the end for mobile applications appears to be incorrect, as the volume of newly launched apps is experiencing a significant surge.

Data from analytics firm Appfigures reveals that global app deployments during the initial three months of 2026 increased by 60% compared to the same period last year, spanning both Apple’s App Store and Google Play. When isolating the iOS ecosystem, this growth rate climbed to an impressive 80%. Early data for April 2026 shows a staggering 104% jump in total app releases across both platforms year-over-year, with iOS seeing an 89% rise.

Echoing this trend, Apple’s Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing, Greg «Joz» Joswiak, recently remarked in an interview that predictions regarding the demise of the App Store in the era of artificial intelligence «may have been greatly exaggerated.»

Image Credits:Appfigures

These statistics surface amidst widespread speculation that the proliferation of AI chatbots and autonomous agents might cause users to abandon traditional applications. This perspective has been voiced by industry figures such as Nothing CEO Carl Pei, who is currently developing a smartphone tailored for the AI epoch. Furthermore, The New York Times previously highlighted the potential for emerging computing forms, including smart eyewear, ambient devices, and AI-enhanced watches, to surpass smartphones.

In a notable development, OpenAI is reportedly collaborating with renowned Apple designer Jony Ive on a new AI-focused hardware product.

Conversely, an alternative theory suggests that artificial intelligence is lowering the barrier to entry for app development, potentially triggering a renaissance for the App Store. This emerging wave could be spearheaded by innovators with creative concepts but lacking traditional coding expertise.

According to Appfigures’ analytics, specific app categories are experiencing heightened development activity.

Meet your next investor or portfolio startup at Disrupt

Your next round. Your next hire. Your next breakout opportunity. Find it at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, where 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders gather for three days of 250+ tactical sessions, powerful introductions, and market-defining innovation. Register now to save up to $410.

Meet your next investor or portfolio startup at Disrupt

Your next round. Your next hire. Your next breakout opportunity. Find it at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, where 10,000+ founders, investors, and tech leaders gather for three days of 250+ tactical sessions, powerful introductions, and market-defining innovation. Register now to save up to $410.

While mobile gaming continues to dominate the landscape for new app deployments globally in Q1 2026, mirroring previous trends, «productivity» tools have successfully entered the top five this year. The «utilities» sector has climbed to the second position, while «lifestyle» applications have advanced from fifth to third place last year. Completing the top five are «health and fitness» applications.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media