The iPhone 16 Pro already packs one of the best camera setups found on any phone, but the iPhone 17 needs to take things even further when it launches in just a few weeks. Sure, Apple’s phones are capable of taking stunning photos, thanks to its awesome software, ProRaw format and its wealth of video skills, but Apple’s rivals have been doing big things, too. The Galaxy S25 Ultra, the Pixel 9 Pro and the Xiaomi 14 Ultra all pack amazing camera setups that have given the iPhone 16 Pro a run for its money and made it clear that Apple isn’t the only company innovating in the imaging arena.

Read more: Camera Champions Face Off: iPhone 16 Pro vs. Galaxy S25 Ultra

While early reports from industry insiders claim that the phone’s video skills will get a boost, there’s more the iPhone 17 will need to make it an all-around photography powerhouse. As both an experienced phone reviewer and a professional photographer, I have exceptionally high expectations for top-end phone cameras. And, having used the iPhone 16 Pro since its launch, I have some thoughts on what needs to change. 

Here are the main points I want to see improved on the iPhone 17 when it likely launches in September 2025.

An accessible Pro camera mode

At WWDC, Apple showed off the changes to the upcoming iOS 26 which included a radical change to the interface with Liquid Glass. But that simplified style extended to the camera app too, with Apple paring the interface down to the most basic functions of Photo, Video and zoom levels. Presumably, the idea is to make it super easy for even the most beginner of photographers to open the camera and start taking Instagram-worthy snaps. 

And that’s fine, but what about those of us who buy the Pro models in order to take deeper advantage of features like exposure compensation, Photographic Styles and ProRaw formats? It’s not totally clear yet how these features can be accessed within the new camera interface, but they need to not be tucked away. Many photographers — myself very much included — want to use these tools as standard, using our powerful iPhones in much the same way we would a mirrorless camera from Canon or Sony. 

That means relying on advanced settings to take control over the image-taking process to craft shots that go beyond simple snaps. If anything, Apple’s camera app has always been too simple, with even basic functions like white balance being unavailable. To see Apple take things to an even more simplistic level is concerning, and I want to see how the company will continue to make these phones usable for enthusiastic photographers. 

Larger image sensor

Though the 1/1.28-inch sensor found on  the iPhone 16 Pro’s main camera is already a good size — and marginally larger than the S24 Ultra’s 1/1.33-inch sensor — I want to see Apple go bigger. A larger image sensor can capture more light and offer better dynamic range. It’s why pro cameras tend to have at least «full frame» image sensors, while really high-end cameras, like the amazing Hasselblad 907X, have enormous «medium format» sensors for pristine image quality. 

Xiaomi understands this, equipping its 15 Ultra and previous 14 Ultra with 1-inch type sensors. It’s larger than the sensors found on almost any other phone, which allowed the 15 Ultra to take stunning photos all over Europe, while the 14 Pro was heroic in capturing images at Taylor Swift concerts. I’m keen to see Apple at least match Xiaomi’s phone here with a similar 1-inch type sensor. Though if we’re talking pie-in-the-sky wishes, maybe the iPhone 17 could be the first smartphone with a full-frame image sensor. I won’t hold my breath on that one — the phone, and the lenses, would need to be immense to accommodate it, so it’d likely be more efficient just to let you make calls with your mirrorless camera. 

Don’t lean on AI too much

AI has become a bigger part of the camera experience on many Android phones, from the Honor 400 Pro’s tool that brought my dad back to life to the Pixel 9 Pro’s wild generative AI functions. But iPhones have always emphasized the importance of real image quality, producing sharp, detailed images that remain faithful to the scene you actually saw when you pushed the shutter button. 

Apple’s dalliances in AI so far haven’t exactly been groundbreaking and I worry that the company may want to be seen as making a bigger push for deeper, more ‘innovative’ uses for AI. And sure, maybe some of those could be useful in other parts of the phone, but the iPhone 17 cameras first and foremost still need to be able to deliver truly superb-looking images, not simply use AI to compensate for any hardware shortcomings.

Variable aperture

One of the other reasons the Xiaomi 14 Ultra phone rocks so hard for photography is its variable aperture on the main camera. Its widest aperture is f/1.6 — significantly wider than the f/1.78 of the iPhone 16 Pro.That wider aperture lets in a lot of light in dim conditions and more authentically achieves out-of-focus bokeh around a subject. 

But Xiaomi’s 14 Ultra aperture can also close down to f/4, and with that narrower aperture, it’s able to create starbursts around points of light. I love achieving this effect in nighttime imagery with the phone. It makes the resulting images look much more like they’ve been taken with a professional camera and lens, while the same points of light on the iPhone just look like roundish blobs. Disappointingly, Xiaomi actually removed this feature from the new 15 Ultra so whether Apple sees value in implementing this kind of technology remains to be seen. 

More Photographic Styles

Though Apple has had various styles and effects integrated into the iPhone’s cameras, the iPhone 16 range took it further, with more control over the effects and more toning options. It’s enough that former CNET Senior Editor Lisa Eadicicco even declared the Photographic Styles her «favorite new feature on Apple’s latest phone.»

I think they’re great, too. Or rather, they’re a great start. The different color tones, like the ones you get with the Amber and Gold styles, add some lovely warmth to scenes, and the Quiet effect adds a vintage filmic fade, but there’s still not a whole lot to choose from and the interface is slow to work through. I’d love to see Apple introduce more Photographic Styles with different color toning options, or even with tones that mimic vintage film stocks from Kodak or Fujifilm. 

And sure, there are plenty of third-party apps like VSCO or Snapseed that let you play around with color filters all you want. But using Apple’s styles means you can take your images with the look already applied, and then change it afterward if you don’t like it — nothing is hard-baked into your image. 

I was recently impressed with Samsung’s new tool for creating custom color filters based off the look of other images. I’d love to see Apple bring that level of image customization to the iPhone.

Better ProRaw integration with Photographic Styles

I do think Apple has slightly missed an opportunity with its Photographic Styles, though, in that you can use them only when taking images in HEIF (high-efficiency image format). Unfortunately, you can’t use them when shooting in ProRaw. I love Apple’s use of ProRaw on previous iPhones, as it takes advantage of all of the iPhone’s computational photography — including things like HDR image blending — but still outputs a DNG raw file for easier editing. 

The DNG file typically also offers more latitude to brighten dark areas or tone down highlights in an image, making it extremely versatile. Previously, Apple’s color presets could be used when shooting in ProRaw, and I loved it. I frequently shot street-style photos using the high contrast black-and-white mode and then edited the raw file further. 

Now using that same black-and-white look means only shooting images in HEIF format, eliminating the benefits of using Apple’s ProRaw. Oddly, while the older-style «Filters» are no longer available in the camera app when taking a raw image, you can still apply those filters to raw photos in the iPhone’s gallery app through the editing menu.

LUTs for ProRes video

And while we’re on the topic of color presets and filters, Apple needs to bring those to video, too. On the iPhone 15 Pro, Apple introduced the ability to shoot video in ProRes, which results in very low-contrast, almost gray-looking footage. The idea is that video editors will take this raw footage and then apply their edits on top, often applying contrast and color presets known as LUTs (look-up tables) that gives footage a particular look — think dark and blue for horror films or warm and light tones for a romantic drama vibe. 

But Apple doesn’t offer any kind of LUT for editing ProRes video on the iPhone, beyond simply ramping up the contrast, which doesn’t really do the job properly. Sure, the point of ProRes is that you would take that footage off the iPhone, put it into software like Davinci Resolve, and then properly color grade the footage so it looks sleek and professional. 

But that still leaves the files on your phone, and I’d love to be able to do more with them. My gallery is littered with ungraded video files that I’ll do very little with because they need color grading externally. I’d love to share them to Instagram, or with my family over WhatsApp, after transforming those files from drab and gray to beautifully colorful.

With the iPhone 17, or even with the iPhone 16 as a software update, I want to see Apple creating a range of its own LUTs that can be directly applied to ProRes video files on the iPhone. While we didn’t see this software functionality discussed as part of the company’s June WWDC keynote, that doesn’t mean it couldn’t be launched with the iPhone in September.

If Apple were able to implement all these changes — excluding, perhaps, the full-frame sensor which even I can admit is a touch ambitious — it would have an absolute beast of a camera on its hands.