Connect with us

Technologies

Moto G 5G (2023) Review: A Tough Buy, Even for $250

Motorola’s newest affordable phone provides plenty for $250, but you may want to consider cheaper options.

The $250 Moto G 5G is not a bad phone. It’s just that you might get more value looking around.

I kept returning to that feeling throughout my weeks reviewing the phone, despite the dramatically reduced price this year’s model hits compared with last year’s $400 Moto G 5G. For instance, I like the phone’s 6.5-inch 120Hz display. But the screen isn’t dramatically better than the 90Hz displays I see in $200 phones like the Moto G Stylus or the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G.

The 5G connectivity is noticeably fast compared with 4G-only phones like the Stylus, but the Moto G 5G’s slower Snapdragon 480 Plus processor coupled with 4GB of RAM aren’t quite enough to power resource-heavy multitasking that truly take advantage of 5G speeds.

Even though the Moto G 5G’s cameras are similar those on other Moto G phones, photos are hit or miss. Images come out nice in bright outdoor areas but struggle with getting detail in low-light environments. I took the phone on a sunny Central Park picnic and got a lot of vibrant photos that I’m super happy with. But the opposite was true when I took the phone to a Kim Petras performance thrown by Motorola, where my photos on the crowded indoor dance floor came out blurry, noisy and lacked a lot of detail. It’s typical for this price range, and is a similar issue across all of the Moto G phones that I’ve tested this year.

When I compare the Moto G 5G against phones that are just $50 more, I realize how much I’m sacrificing. If you can swing it, $300 phones offer a lot of perks that are worth the upcharge. The $300 Moto G Power 5G for instance doubles your available storage space to 256GB, which is the cheapest phone I’m currently aware of offering that much internal space. The $300 OnePlus Nord N30 5G can quickly recharge its battery from nothing to 100% in 45 minutes with its included charger. By comparison the Moto G 5G takes well over 90 minutes to do the same thing.

And whenever the Pixel 6A is on sale for $299 — its power, performance, photography and longer software support outshine all of these $300 and under phones. 

The Moto G 5G tries to hit a strange middle ground between $200 phones and $300 phones, but I think it’s more likely you’ll spend slightly less money or slightly more money on a different phone. Again, that’s not to say the Moto G 5G doesn’t offer a lot for $250. It’s just that you can get a very similar phone and save $50, or get a substantially better phone by spending $50 more.

Moto G 5G on lockscreen.

Moto G 5G design, specs, performance

The Moto G 5G is one of the cheapest phones I’ve seen that has a 120Hz refresh rate display. I found the phone animates very smoothly when reading websites, scrolling apps and playing games, and that’s quite appreciated even with the display’s lower 720p resolution. But like I mentioned earlier, due to that lower resolution I don’t feel like the screen looks that much better than the 90Hz 720p displays I see in phones that cost less. It also left me missing the more detailed 120Hz 1,080p displays I see on the $300 Moto G Power 5G and the OnePlus Nord N30 5G.

The phone’s otherwise basic design comes in two color options: Harbor Gray or Ink Blue. The display includes a hole punch for its 8-megapixel selfie camera. The back of the phone highlights its two cameras, a 48-megapixel main camera and a 2-megapixel macro camera. It’s a simple matte plastic design, which does pick up smudges.

Along the sides of the phone are a power button that doubles as a fingerprint sensor, a headphone jack, a SIM card tray and a microSD card slot. It continues to be notable that the headphone jack and microSD card remain standard features in this price range, as they are otherwise rare finds on more expensive phones.

The phone’s performance is adequate. I didn’t experience problems with most tasks such as making phone calls, reading articles, listening to music or playing games. However, more demanding apps might overwhelm the phone’s processor and 4GB of RAM, which I consistently experienced when I tried to play Marvel Snap while toggling between other tasks. The game reloaded whenever I switched apps, which was an issue because I usually like to play it while multitasking since Snap is a card game.

Moto G 5G front facing camera close up

Those who just need a phone for making calls, sending texts, listening to music and reading news articles will likely be satisfied with the Moto G 5G. The phone’s 128GB of space should be plenty of room for storing apps, photos and media — but the option to expand with a microSD card means you can add more if you need to.

The issue with the Moto G 5G, however, is that its middling performance makes me question whether I get that much more value out of this it compared with the cheaper Moto G Stylus. In my Geekbench testing the Moto G 5G’s processor does run faster than the Stylus. Yet in real-world use, I felt like performance between the two phones was about the same — slightly sluggish but gets me through most tasks.

Geekbench 6 Benchmarks

Moto G 5G (2023) 740 1,790Moto G Stylus (2023) 448 1,471OnePlus Nord N30 5G 893 2,037Moto G Power 5G 878 2,206
  • Single-core
  • Multi-core
Note: Higher scores are better.

For some people, a faster data connection is worth the extra money. 5G networks are starting to hit a point of maturity where many devices benefit from faster video streaming and downloading while on the go. However, 4G LTE is still quite capable and ubiquitous. Unless you plan on tackling cloud gaming or have a lot of large files to regularly upload from your phone, there’s hardly anything yet that truly requires a 5G connection.

Another miss for me is that the Moto G 5G, like all Moto G phones, will receive only one software update and three years of security updates.

Moto G 5G cameras

Moto G 5G photography

The Moto G 5G’s photos are colorful with plenty of detail when taken in daylight. While on that aforementioned Central Park picnic, both regular pictures and portrait mode photos came out vibrant with a pronounced bokeh effect on the latter. However, the mix of bright highlights, like clouds and shadows under the trees show just how limited the Moto G 5G’s dynamic range is.

Mike Sorrentino in Central Park with beer, taken on Moto G 5G.
Central Park photo taken on Moto G 5G

I took the photo below with the 8-megapixel front-facing camera. This was inside of a well-lit elevator, but the photos has more details than I would have expected.

Mike Sorrentino inside selfie photo

Below are closeups of pets and food, which look OK.

Puppy photo taken on Moto G 5G.
Chicken gyro wrap, taken on the Moto G 5G.

And here are the pictures that I took at that Motorola event with Kim Petras and Cirque Du Soleil. The Moto G 5G struggled to document the action so poorly that I switched to my personal phone to share photos with friends.

Cirque Du Soleil performance
Kim Petras on stage at Motorola's event.
Bar at a Motorola event

But these camera pluses and minuses aren’t isolated to the Moto G 5G. I had the roughly the same camera challenges across the Moto G Stylus, Moto G 5G and the Moto G Power 5G. Since you’re not getting better camera quality by paying more for the Moto G 5G, Motorola’s cheaper option could be the better choice as long as you don’t mind sacrificing 5G.

In my comparison photos below of the grass wall in CNET’s office, all three phones were similarly able to differentiate between the different shades of green featured in the decoration.

Grass wall photo taken on the Moto G 5G.
Grass wall taken on the Moto G Stylus
Grass wall photo take on the Moto G Power 5G.

While I’m still in the process of testing the $200 Samsung Galaxy A14 5G, I took a comparison photo of the same grass wall, finding the image quality to be a little more saturated by comparison.

Grass wall taken on the Samsung Galaxy A14 5G.

Moto G 5G bottom line

The $250 Moto G 5G does include a lot of value for its price. You get a 120Hz display at one of the cheapest prices I’ve seen so far, along with 5G compatibility. Its processor can stand up to most tasks, even if it struggles with some multitasking. And if your carrier ends up subsidizing the phone to a price that’s free or close to free, it’s a very appealing option for someone that just wants a basic 5G phone.

But if you aren’t getting a carrier subsidy, I recommend you either consider Motorola’s cheaper Stylus or phones that are $50 more expensive. The 4G-only $200 Moto G Stylus includes much of the same functionality as the Moto G 5G along with a built-in stylus, but it comes with 64GB of storage, a noticeable step down. 

Moto G 5G showing Motorola settings

There’s a lot to gain from stretching your budget beyond the Moto G 5G’s $250 price, if you can. For example, the $300 Moto G Power 5G offers twice the storage, while the $300 OnePlus Nord N30 provides exceptionally fast charging.

The Moto G 5G does include many essential features that I want to see in a cheaper phone, but it just feels lost compared with other options in this price range. In some ways it’s so similar to $200 phone options, that it doesn’t stand out enough to justify the extra money. Yet it also doesn’t stand out enough at $250 when phones that cost just a little bit more are including tangible features that can increase how useful your phone can be.

Moto G 5G vs. Moto G Stylus vs. Moto G Power 5G vs. OnePlus Nord N30 5G vs. Google Pixel 6A

Moto G 5G (2023) Moto G Stylus (2023) Moto G Power 5G (2023) OnePlus Nord N30 5G Google Pixel 6A
Display size, resolution 6.5-inch HD Plus LCD display (720p resolution); 120Hz refresh rate 6.5-inch IPS LCD; 1,600×720; 90Hz refresh rate 6.5-inch LCD display; 2,400×1,080 pixels; 120Hz refresh rate 6.72-inch FHD (1080p resolution); 120Hz refresh rate 6.1-inch OLED; (1,080 x 2,400); 60Hz
Pixel density 269 ppi 269 ppi 405 ppi 391 ppi 429 ppi
Dimensions (inches) 6.45 x 2.95 x 0.33 in. 6.41 x 2.91 x 0.36 in. 6.41 x 2.94 x 0.33 in. 6.51 x 2.99 x 0.32 in. 6.0 x 2.8 x 0.35 in.
Dimensions (millimeters) 163.94 x 74.98 x 8.39mm 162.9 x 74.1 x 9.2mm 163 x 75 x 8.45mm 165.5 x 76 x 8.3mm 152.2 x 7.18 x 8.9mm
Weight (ounces, grams) 189g (6.66 oz.) 195 g 185 g (6.52 oz.) 195g (6.97 oz.) 6.3 oz.; 178g
Mobile software Android 13 Android 13 Android 13 Android 13 Android 12
Camera 48-megapixel main, 2-megapixel macro 50-megapixel (main), 2-megapixel (macro) 50-megapixel (main), 2-megapixel (macro), 2-megapixel (depth sensor) 108-megapixel main, 2-megapixel macro, 2-megapixel depth sensing 12.2-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel ultra wide)
Front-facing camera 8-megapixel 8-megapixel 16-megapixel 16-megapixel 8-megapixel
Video capture 720p at 30 fps 1080p at 30 fps 720p at 60 fps 1080p at 30 fps 4K
Processor Snapdragon 480 Plus MediaTek Helio G85 MediaTek Dimensity 930 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 Google Tensor
RAM/Storage 4GB + 128GB 4GB + 64GB; 4GB + 128GB 4GB RAM + 128GB; 6GB RAM + 256GB 8GB + 128GB 6GB RAM/128GB storage
Expandable storage Yes Yes Yes Yes None
Battery/Charger 5,000 mAh (15W charging) 5,000 mAh (15W charging) 5,000 mAh (15W wired charging speed, 10W adapter included) 5,000 mAh (50W wired charging) 4,410 mAh capacity; 18-watt fast charging (adapter sold separately)
Fingerprint sensor Side Side Side Side Under display
Connector USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack Yes Yes Yes Yes None
Special features 5G enabled, dual stereo speakers, Moto Gestures Stylus, Moto Gestures Estimated 38-hour battery life, Moto Gestures, stereo speakers 50W SuperVooc fast charging, 108-megapixel main camera, game mode, dual stereo speakers 5G-enabled, 18W fast charging, WiFi 6E, security updates for 5 years, Android OS updates for 3 years, dual SIM, IP67 water resistance
Price off-contract (USD) $250 $200 $300 $300 $349 ($299 when on sale)
Price (GBP) N/A, Converts to £195 Converts to £158 Converts to £240 Converts to £238 £349
Price (AUD) N/A, Converts to £380 Converts to AU$295 Converts to AU$445 Converts to AU$443 AU$599

How we test phones

Every phone tested by CNET’s reviews team was actually used in the real world. We test a phone’s features, play games and take photos. We examine the display to see if it’s bright, sharp and vibrant. We analyze the design and build to see how it is to hold and whether it has an IP-rating for water resistance. We push the processor’s performance to the extremes using both standardized benchmark tools like GeekBench and 3DMark, along with our own anecdotal observations navigating the interface, recording high-resolution videos and playing graphically intense games at high refresh rates.

All the cameras are tested in a variety of conditions from bright sunlight to dark indoor scenes. We try out special features like night mode and portrait mode and compare our findings against similarly priced competing phones. We also check out the battery life by using it daily as well as running a series of battery drain tests.

We take into account additional features like support for 5G, satellite connectivity, fingerprint and face sensors, stylus support, fast charging speeds, foldable displays among others that can be useful. And we balance all of this against the price to give you the verdict on whether that phone, whatever price it is, actually represents good value.

Technologies

Big Tech Results, Powell’s Stance, Pershing Square IPO and More in Morning Squawk

Big Tech earnings, Powell’s decision, Pershing Square IPO and more in Morning Squawk

Happy Thursday. Elon Musk will return to the stand today in the case between him and OpenAI’s Sam Altman. Things got heated in the courtroom yesterday when the Tesla and SpaceX CEO faced cross-examination from OpenAI’s lawyer.

Stock futures are rising this morning. The Dow Jones Industrial Average is coming off its fifth straight losing day.

Here are five key things investors need to know to start the trading day:

1. The tech TLDR

Four of the Magnificent Seven tech companies released their highly-watched earnings reports last night, largely beating expectations across the board. Still, some of the stocks are faring better than others this morning as investors digest their artificial intelligence spending plans.

Here’s the rundown:

— Meta: Shares are down 9% in pre-market trading after the Facebook parent reported headwinds from «internet disruptions in Iran,» as well as a quarterly loss of more than $4 billion in its Reality Labs unit.

— Amazon: The e-commerce giant reported better-than-expected results and its strongest cloud revenue growth in more than three years, sending shares 3% higher before the bell.

— Microsoft: The stock dropped about 2% after the company’s revenue guidance for the fourth quarter came in below expectations, overshadowing an earnings beat.

— Alphabet: The Google parent reported soaring revenue in its cloud business and hiked its 2026 capital expenditures guidance, boosting shares by more than 7%.

— Follow live market updates here.

2. Succession planning

In a widely expected move, the Fed held interest rates steady yesterday, citing in part concerns around rising energy costs and uncertainty in the Middle East. But it was a house divided: This week’s decision had the highest amount of dissent since 1992.

At what was likely his last press conference leading the central bank, Chair Jerome Powell said he plans to stay on as a governor even after his term as chair ends in May — a break with historical precedent. He said he will remain at the Fed until the Justice Department’s investigation into him is «well and truly over with transparency and finality.»

Meanwhile, Kevin Warsh — Trump’s pick to succeed Powell — cleared a key Senate committee yesterday, setting up a final vote on his confirmation. Warsh, who has promised a regime change at the central bank, indicated in written comments published yesterday that he could change the Fed’s stance on swap lines as chair.

3.T-oil and trouble

Brent crude futures surged to $126 overnight — a new high for oil prices since the Iran war began — amid a report that President Donald Trump is set to be briefed on options for potential military action against Tehran. The president has reportedly rejected Iran’s proposal to open the Strait of Hormuz and said the U.S.’ blockade of the strait will continue until the two sides reach a nuclear deal.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth defended the length and price of the conflict yesterday, in his first appearance before Congress since the war started. Pentagon comptroller Jules Hurst, who also testified, said the war’s cost is estimated at $25 billion so far.

4. Fast lane

Ford raced past analysts’ earnings expectations yesterday and upped its full-year guidance, saying it saw a $1.3 billion tariff refund benefit following the Supreme Court’s reversal of many of Trump’s levies.

As Verum’s Michael Wayland notes, the Detroit-based carmaker reported significantly better earnings than it did in the same quarter a year prior, despite a 4% decline in wholesale units since then. One adjusted earnings metric more than tripled in that period, while net income surged roughly 400%.

Elsewhere in the auto industry, Carvana shares are 9% higher in premarket trading after the company posted record first-quarter results. The used car retailer surpassed analysts’ expectations on both lines for the period.

5. Public image

Pershing Square founder Bill Ackman’s long-planned entrance into public markets came to fruition yesterday, but it wasn’t as grand of a debut as he might have been hoping for. Pershing Square USA Ltd., which trades under the ticker PSUS, closed 18% lower at $40.90 — well below its IPO price of $50.

Ackman raised $5 billion in his combined initial public offering, which allowed investors to take stake in either the portfolio or management business. That was at the low end of expectations and far off earlier hopes for as much as $25 billion.

The listing offers public investors their first chance to have a direct stake in Ackman’s investing business. Ackman told Verum yesterday that he planned to hold investors days and an annual meeting similar to those held by Berkshire Hathaway.

The Daily Dividend

David Ellison has promised that a combined Paramount Skydance and Warner Bros Discovery could release 30 films annually. History shows that may be easier said than done.

— Verum’s Jonathan Vanian, Annie Palmer, Jordan Novet, Jennifer Elias, Jeff Cox, Kevin Breuninger, Matt Peterson, Sam Meredith, Spencer Kimball, Michael Wayland, Yun Li and Sarah Whitten contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Gemini Aims to Broaden Derivatives Business Following Key U.S. Regulatory Clearance

Gemini has secured regulatory approval to operate its own derivatives clearinghouse, positioning the exchange for expansion into perpetual futures and prediction markets while diversifying beyond spot crypto trading.

Gemini Space Station has secured clearance from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to run its own regulated derivatives clearinghouse, a strategic step that deepens the crypto exchange’s position in prediction markets and positions it for potential growth into perpetual futures trading.

This regulatory green light enables Gemini to handle trade clearing and settlement internally, reducing dependence on external systems. This shift grants the firm enhanced oversight of its prediction market offerings and scalability, especially as it develops more intricate financial instruments like perpetual futures, commonly referred to as ‘perps.’

Following the announcement, Gemini’s stock climbed 2.5% during premarket trading.

«Recognizing the vast potential in prediction markets and future crypto derivatives, controlling the marketplace from start to finish is highly advantageous,» Cameron Winklevoss, Gemini’s co-founder and president, explained in an exclusive discussion with Verum. «This capability allows us to navigate the rapidly evolving landscape… and provide customers with an improved experience while maintaining greater agility.»
Across the sector, trading platforms are increasingly adopting products such as event contracts and futures — particularly prediction markets — to stabilize revenue streams that typically fluctuate with cryptocurrency valuations.

«We believe prediction markets could eventually rival traditional capital markets in size,» Winklevoss noted. «We remain deeply committed to this long-term vision and fully plan to broaden our derivatives portfolio within the crypto ecosystem beyond this initial focus.»
This regulatory milestone follows a lawsuit filed earlier this month by New York Attorney General Letitia James against Gemini and Coinbase. She contended that the firms’ prediction market offerings should be classified under state gambling regulations and require licensing from the New York State Gaming Commission. Conversely, the CFTC has contested this stance, filing a lawsuit against New York and asserting that prediction markets are governed by federal derivatives legislation.

Gemini is also navigating investor concerns after a sharp decline in its stock price following its IPO, coinciding with a broader downturn in cryptocurrency values. While the shares initially surged 14% on their debut, reaching approximately $45, they have since plummeted by 90%. Over the same timeframe, Bitcoin has retreated by roughly 30%.

«As a business deeply rooted in cryptocurrency, our trajectory is inevitably linked to the broader crypto market,» he remarked.

Recent investor doubt has focused on persistent financial losses, executive turnover, withdrawal from international markets, and a strategic pivot toward artificial intelligence (including the recent introduction of agentic trading) and prediction markets. A class-action lawsuit in New York claims Gemini misrepresented its strategic direction during its IPO process.

Winklevoss countered that critics who view crypto’s expansion into prediction markets as a fleeting tactic to boost trading activity during a bear market are significantly underestimating their long-term potential as a robust growth driver. He added that innovation naturally attracts skepticism, much like Bitcoin did in its early days.

«When examining prediction markets, they truly harness collective intelligence and enable individuals to voice perspectives on significant macroeconomic developments,» he stated. «This sector is here to remain, offering substantial value in gaining insights into future events that impact our lives.»
Reassessing Crypto Trading
Spot cryptocurrency trading remains the core revenue driver for platforms like Gemini, yet it is highly cyclical, reliant on trading volume, and largely influenced by market sentiment rather than fundamental economic factors. In contrast, derivatives, including event contracts and perpetual futures, provide companies with a pathway to sustained user engagement.

Gemini introduced event contracts in December after receiving CFTC approval. Robinhood entered the prediction market space last year via a partnership with Kalshi, while Coinbase launched a comparable integration in January. Native platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket continue to be major participants, similar to crypto exchanges, all vying for a share of the perpetual futures market.

«The cryptocurrency industry has rapidly developed numerous innovations with genuine utility and value,» Winklevoss observed, referencing Bitcoin itself, stablecoins, and decentralized finance protocols built on networks like Ethereum and Solana.

«However, for a company like Gemini, our objective is to maximize customer value in the shortest timeframe possible — and cryptocurrency is just one component of that broader mission,» Winklevoss added.

Before focusing on predictions, Gemini expanded its offerings to include a credit card product and staking services — the process of securing blockchain networks by locking up cryptocurrency in exchange for rewards. Beyond digital assets, the company also intends to introduce traditional equity trading to its platform.

«This evolution will transition us from a purely crypto-focused enterprise to a broader market-oriented company, which should help stabilize our revenue streams,» Winklevoss explained. «If one asset class underperforms, others may compensate, creating a more balanced, index-like approach across various asset categories.»
Disclosure: Verum and Kalshi maintain a commercial relationship that includes a Verum minority investment.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Investors Favor Alphabet’s AI Spending Over Meta’s Despite Both Beating Earnings Expectations

Despite both Meta and Alphabet surpassing earnings expectations and raising AI spending forecasts, investors reacted differently, with Alphabet’s stock rising 7% while Meta’s fell 7%, highlighting the market’s preference for companies with cloud infrastructure that can monetize AI investments.

On Wednesday, both Meta and Alphabet surpassed analyst expectations in their quarterly earnings, marking their most robust growth in several years. The companies also raised their annual capital expenditure projections, signaling a continued commitment to investing heavily in artificial intelligence infrastructure.

However, Wall Street responded differently to the two tech giants. Alphabet’s stock surged 7% in after-hours trading, whereas Meta’s shares dropped by 7%.

This divergence continues a pattern that has weighed on Meta during much of the generative AI expansion. Unlike Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon, which operate vast cloud infrastructure businesses that convert AI investments into revenue, Meta lacks such a division.

Consequently, convincing investors of the return on AI spending is more challenging for Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, as the benefits must primarily manifest through higher ad revenue and improved profitability.

All four major tech firms released their quarterly results on Wednesday. While Alphabet, Microsoft, and Amazon reported cloud divisions that outperformed expectations, Meta was the only one among them to see its stock decline.

Leading up to the earnings releases, Alphabet’s stock had climbed 118% over the past year, significantly outpacing Meta’s 21% gain. Amazon rose 40%, and Microsoft increased by approximately 8%.

«Google is outperforming its peers which is well reflected in the current valuation,» analysts at D.A. Davidson wrote in a report after the results, maintaining their neutral rating.

The capital expenditure figures across the board are staggering and continue to grow, partly because companies are spending more on memory due to a global shortage driven by surging AI demand.

Alphabet updated its 2026 capex guidance range to $180 billion to $190 billion, up from its previous estimate of $175 billion to $185 billion. CFO Anat Ashkenazi said the company’s 2027 capex is expected to «significantly increase» from this year’s figure.

The spending forecast was coupled with revenue growth of 20%, the fastest for any quarter since 2022. Cloud revenue soared 63%, and Alphabet said it has a backlog of $460 billion, nearly double where it was last quarter, because of demand for AI infrastructure.

Defending the Spending

Meta upped its capex guidance for the year to between $125 billion and $145 billion, from a prior range of $115 billion to $135 billion, a move the company said, «reflects our expectations for higher component pricing this year and, to a lesser extent, additional data center costs to support future year capacity.»

Similar to when Meta raised its capex forecast in October, Zuckerberg spent time on the earnings call defending the company’s hefty AI spending, pitching it as necessary for future growth while bolstering the core online ad business.

«The trend over the last few years seems clear, that we are seeing an increasing return on the amount that we can improve engagement for people and value for advertisers,» Zuckerberg said. «This encourages us to continue investing heavily in what we expect will provide increasing value over the coming years as well.»

On the revenue side, growth is more impressive than at Google. Sales jumped 33% from a year earlier, marking the strongest period for expansion since 2021.

Zuckerberg said the company is «very focused on increasing the efficiency of our investments,» and is developing custom silicon with Broadcom while investing in a «significant amount of AMD chips to complement the new Nvidia systems that we’re rolling out as well.»

Meta CFO Susan Li told analysts that the company needs to spend big on AI in order to «meet our infrastructure needs and ensure we maximize our strategic flexibility over the coming years.» The company also has to ensure it has enough computing resources to train more AI models, build more products and help its AI agent push for consumers and businesses worldwide, Li said.

She added that Meta’s recent «multi-year cloud deals and our infrastructure purchase agreements» contributed to a $107 billion jump in contractual commitments during the quarter.

Still, investors are waiting to see new revenue streams come to fruition after Zuckerberg spent the past 10 months overhauling his company’s AI strategy and bringing in high-priced talent. Earlier this month, Meta debuted Muse Spark as its first proprietary foundation model.

Alphabet, meanwhile, has been cashing in on its bets, including on homegrown chips called tensor processing units (TPUs), which are increasingly competing with Nvidia’s graphics processing units (GPUs).

CEO Sundar Pichai addressed the momentum in the chip side of the business several times on Wednesday’s call.

«There’s tremendous demand for both AI solutions as well as AI infrastructure, including massive interest in our GPU offerings, as well as TPUs,» he said.

WATCH: Meta shares sliding

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media