Connect with us

Technologies

Bose Sound Comes to Baseus Inspire XP1 Earbuds and I’m Impressed

These new noise-canceling earbuds from value brand Baseus include Sound by Bose. They deliver surprisingly good performance for a little more than $100.

Our Experts

Headshot of David Carnoy
David Carnoy Executive Editor / Reviews
Executive Editor David Carnoy has been a leading member of CNET’s Reviews team since 2000. He covers the gamut of gadgets and is a notable reviewer of mobile accessories and portable audio products, including headphones and speakers. He’s also an e-reader and e-publishing expert as well as the author of the novels Knife Music, The Big Exit and Lucidity. All the titles are available as Kindle, iBooks, Kobo e-books and audiobooks.
Expertise Headphones, Bluetooth speakers, mobile accessories, Apple, Sony, Bose, e-readers, Amazon, glasses, ski gear, iPhone cases, gaming accessories, sports tech, portable audio, interviews, audiophile gear, PC speakers Credentials

  • Maggie Award for Best Regularly Featured Web Column/Consumer
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

8.2/ 10
SCORE

Baseus Inspire XP1

Pros

  • Well-designed earbuds with comfortable, secure fit
  • Good sound quality for the price with Sound by Bose
  • Good noise cancellation
  • Decent voice-calling performance

Cons

  • Dolby spatial audio falls well short of Apple’s spatial audio with head-tracking
  • No wireless charging

In the last year or so Bose has collaborated with a handful of affordable audio brands as it gradually expands its «Sound by Bose» initiative. Like the Bose-infused Skullcandy Method 360 ANC earbuds, the Baseus Inspire XP1 ($110) reviewed here have very good sound and overall performance. These comfortable earbuds share some similarities with Bose’s $300 QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) for less than half the price, making them one of the best earbuds values around and a CNET Editors’ Choice winner. 

Read more: Best wireless earbuds of 2025

Bose-like fit

It appears that Bose has not only helped engineer the Inspire XP1’s sound but their design, as they have similar eartips to the QuietComfort Ultras. Baesus leaves off the stability bands that help lock the buds into your ears, however: That’s an extra found on the Bose buds as well as the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC. Even without the bands, the Baseus buds fit my ears very well and I had no problem running with them (they’re IPX4 splash-proof). The eartips’ tight seal created good passive noise isolation and allowed for optimal sound quality and noise-canceling performance.  

The Inspire XP1 have a couple of advantages over the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC, which I also liked and sell for around the same price. The Inspire XP1 have a smaller case and the stems of the Baseus buds are narrower than the Skullcandy’s. They XP1’s have six microphones (three in each earbud) compared to the Method 360 ANC’s four microphones (two in each earbud). 

Impressive sound for the price 

Out of the box, the Inspire XP1 have a fairly balanced, though marginally V-shaped, sound profile with accentuated bass and treble and slightly recessed, albeit still warm and natural, midrange. Like Bose’s own headphones and earbuds, they’re designed to sound smooth with a variety of music genres and feature strong, punchy bass and relatively detailed sound along with a fairly wide sound stage. While the sound of the Bose QuietComfort Ultra Earbuds (2nd Gen) is a step-up and has a little more depth and richness to it, the Inspire XP1’s sound isn’t far off the Bose’s pace for sound quality.  

You can tweak the buds’ sound a bit in the Baseus companion app with either the preset equalizer settings or create a custom EQ setting, but I mainly stuck with the default Sound by Bose setting. Not surprisingly the Baesus sound pretty similar to the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC as well.

I compared the Baesus to the slightly less-expensive Earfun Air Pro 4 Plus ($80), which I also awarded a CNET Editors’ Choice and which also has a dual-driver design. The Earfun have a slight edge over the Baseus buds to my ear, with a little bit better treble clarity that makes them sound a tad richer, with greater overall depth. The Inspire XP1 are warmer-sounding and more forgiving.  They don’t accentuate the flaws in poorly recorded tracks as much, so some folks might end up preferring their sound.  

It’s also worth noting that the XP1’s are equipped Dolby spatial audio. Testing it with my iPhone 16 Pro using Apple Music and Spotify, I only noticed a small difference in sound quality when I turned it on in the app (you could argue it’s slightly better but I wasn’t sure about that). I also tested the buds with a Google Pixel 9 phone and felt the same way about the Dolby audio mode. Perhaps we’ll see some changes with a firmware upgrade. Typically, spatial audio modes open up the soundstage a bit. 

How do the Inspire XP1’s features stack up?

The Inspire XP1 have a solid feature set. They’re equipped with Bluetooth 6.1, ear-detection sensors that pause your music when you take a bud out of your ear (and resume playback when you put it back in), a low-latency gaming mode that should also be turned on for video watching (to make sure the audio syncs well) and multipoint Bluetooth pairing that enables you to pair two devices simultaneously to the buds.

There’s no mention of Auracast broadcast audio, which the Earfun Air Pro 4 Plus support. This feature allows you to share your audio with other Auracast-enabled speakers and headphones and tap into public Auracast broadcasts. To be fair Auracast has yet to really take off, so I don’t consider its lack a major knock on the Baesus. They’re also missing wireless charging, which may be slightly more important to you, and which the EarFuns also support.

The Inspire XP1 handle the SBC and AAC audio codecs but not the so-called higher-resolution aptX Lossless or LDAC audio codes that the Earfun Air Pro 4 Plus support (many Android phones support the LDAC codec for Bluetooth streaming but fewer support aptX). I personally don’t think the lack of support for aptX or LDAC is a big deal as most people won’t be able to tell the difference between using AAC and those codecs, especially with this caliber of earbuds. But some people do care about audio codecs so I mention them.

There’s a basic Find My Earbuds option that lets you know where the earbuds were last disconnected from your phone.        

Good noise canceling, decent battery life

While their adaptive noise canceling isn’t up to the level of the Bose QuietComfort Ultra (2nd Gen)’s superb ANC, it’s quite respectable (rated for with a -50 dB, it’s similar to the Earfun Air Pro 4 Plus’ ANC), especially for a set of earbuds in this price range. They also have a transparency mode that lets external sound into the earbuds if you want. It’s just fine, though it doesn’t sound as natural as the AirPods Pro 3’s transparency mode, which is the gold standard,

The Inspire XP1 are rated for up to 6 hours of battery life at moderate volume levels with noise canceling on, with an additional 29 hours in the charging case. Some earbuds offer an hour or two more of battery life on a single charge (the AirPods Pro 3 are rated for up to 7 hours of playback with noise canceling on, for the record). I used the the Inspire XP1 for 3 days without having to recharge them in the case and felt their battery life was perfectly fine.

B+ voice-calling performance

I was a little disappointed with the voice-calling performance of the Skullcandy Method 360 ANC earbuds, so I was eager to see if the Inspire XP1 did better in my tests on the noisy streets of New York. The answer is yes, though it’s more like a «B+» grade than a not top-tier «A.» Callers said the buds did a good job reducing background noise to a minimum, especially when I wasn’t talking. However, while they could hear me reasonably well, my voice warbled from time to time (as it became noisier around me), which made it harder to understand me if I was talking quickly and not enunciating my words. I could hear callers quite well on my end. 

Other Baseus headphones and earbuds with Sound by Bose

The Inspire XP1 aren’t the only earbuds in Baseus new-for-2025 lineup with Sound by Bose. There’s also the Inspire XC1 open earbuds and the XH1 over-ear headphones, all of which cost around $110 when you factor in instant discount coupons on their product pages. I briefly tested both. While I think the XC1 are a good value compared to Bose’s Ultra Open Earbuds and sound good for open earbuds, I prefer the Inspire XP1 and its traditional closed design. The over-ear XH1 also sound good and are a solid value overall, with decent noise canceling, but the headphones felt slightly too big for my head, so I was a little less enamored with them.

Motorola has also released some earbuds with Sound by Bose, including the Moto Buds Plus, which seem like dead ringers for the OnePlus Buds 3. I haven’t tried those, but Bose doesn’t seemed to have influenced their exterior design because they don’t have the Bose-like ear tips of the Baseus and Skullcandy buds.  

Baseus Inspire XP1 final thoughts

The Inspire XP1 are well-designed and sound good for the price, with solid all-around performance, including good noise cancellation and decent voice-calling sound. The Earfun Air Pro 4 Plus feature slightly better sound for less, but I do like the design and fit of the Inspire XP1 buds a bit better; they look and feel a bit more premium (as does their case). As it stands, the Earfun Air Pro 4 Plus are probably the better value because you can get them for $30 less (or $40 less if you apply the code AP4PCNET at checkout on Amazon). But the Inspire XP1 are also near the top of my list of best budget earbuds and earn a CNET Editors’ Choice award. 

Technologies

Which Apple Watch Is for You? Apple Watch Series 11 vs. Ultra 3 and SE 3

Apple revamped its entire Apple Watch line, but some models got more improvements than other. We look at all the details.

When you’re looking to buy a smartwatch, whether you want a way to stay on top of notifications or its health-related features, the Apple Watch is a good place to start. But there isn’t just one. Apple sells three different versions that appeal to different needs.

The flagship Apple Watch Series 11, rugged Apple Watch Ultra 3 and economical Apple Watch SE 3 models are a lot closer in features and specs than they’ve ever been. Let’s compare them to see which deserves a place on your wrist.

Pricing the Apple Watch Series 11, Ultra 3 and SE 3

The current Apple Watch line spans a wide price range, from $249 for the Apple Watch SE 3 to $1,299 for a titanium Apple Watch Series 11 with an Hermès band. Like most fashion accessories, you can choose from different case sizes, materials, cellular connectivity options and bands to find the right fit — and price — for your watch.

The Apple Watch Series 11 offers the widest price range, with two case sizes, two body materials, optional cellular connectivity and premium Hermès models. The Apple Watch SE 3 is available only in aluminum and has the earlier, slightly smaller case sizes. The Apple Watch Ultra 3 comes only in titanium, with a single 49mm size and cellular included by default. 

Read more: Find the best deals on the Series 11 and Ultra 3.

Here’s how they break down:

Apple Watch Series 11 GPS GPS plus cellular
42mm aluminum $399 $499
46mm aluminum $429 $529
42mm titanium $699
46mm titanium $749
Hermès 42mm titanium $1,249
Hermès 46mm titanium $1,299
Apple Watch SE 3
42mm aluminum $249 $299
46mm aluminum $279 $329
Apple Watch Ultra 3
49mm titanium $799
Hermès 49mm titanium $1,399

Series 11 vs. Ultra 3, SE 3 physical designs

The core rounded-rectangle design of the Apple Watch has seen incremental changes since its first iterations. The Series 11 shares the slimmer 9.7mm height profile of the Series 10, with 42mm and 46mm diagonal sizes. Weight is light across the board, from 29.7 to 43.1 grams depending on size and case material. Aluminum models come in space gray, jet black, rose gold or silver, while titanium versions are offered in natural, slate or gold finishes.

The Apple Watch SE 3 is slightly thicker (10.7mm) and slightly smaller, with 40mm and 44mm sizes. Its design most closely harkens back to earlier Apple Watch models. It weighs 26.4 grams or 33 grams, depending on the case size. As the no-frills option, the SE 3 is available in either midnight (black) or starlight (silver).

The Ultra 3 is the most significant departure from the original design, with a thickness of 14.4mm, a 49mm diagonal, and a weight of 61.6 grams. Its titanium body comes in either natural or black — unless you opt for the Hermès edition, which is only offered in natural. 

CNET lead writer Vanessa Hand Orellana described the Ultra 3 in her review as being «like the luxury Land Rover you see in safari brochures: It’s adventure-ready on the outside, with all the modern conveniences on the inside.» The body is also 3D-printed from 100% recycled titanium, but you’d never know it; there are no telltale layering marks found on most 3D-printed items.

Each watch has Apple’s Digital Crown and a side button. The Ultra 3 also includes a programmable Action button, which can, for example, start a workout with a single press.

Aside from looks, all three Apple Watch models are built for durability. The SE 3 is water resistant to 50 meters, so you don’t need to baby it — whether you’re showering, swimming or just living through a rainy Pacific Northwest day.

The Series 11 is also rated for water resistance to 50 meters, while the Ultra 3 doubles that to 100 meters. They’re also both certified IP6X dust-resistant, which is better than the SE.

Series 11 vs. Ultra 3, SE 3 displays

The Series 11 and Ultra 3 both use an LPTO 3 OLED display, which offers an always-on display and a wide viewing angle, so you don’t need to look at it head-on to see the time. It can also get very bright: 2,000 nits of peak brightness for the Series 11 and 3,000 nits (the same as the iPhone 17 Pro) for the Ultra 3. 

The energy-efficient screen can refresh its display at just one nit of brightness once every second when in its passive state, so you can always see the second hand or indicator (depending on the watch face).

The display is protected by a sapphire crystal on the titanium Series 11 and the Ultra 3. According to Apple, the aluminum Series 11 uses Ion-X glass, which is twice as scratch-resistant as the Series 10.

In past generations, the SE was stuck with the lowest-quality screen, but not this time. The SE 3 gets an always-on LTPO OLED display that reaches up to 2,000 nits of brightness and dims to just 2 nits when inactive. But it doesn’t refresh as often as the Series 11 and Ultra 3, so the seconds indicator only appears when the screen is active. It’s still a big «quality of life» bump from prior SE watches, which don’t have an always-on display mode.

Series 11 vs. Ultra 3, SE 3 battery life

One surprise with the new Apple Watch lineup is improved battery life in the Series 11 and Ultra 3, plus a fast-charge option on the SE 3 that lets you top up for a night’s sleep after a full day.

Apple claims up to 24 hours of use on a single charge for the Series 11, up from 18 hours for the Series 10. It also claims up to 38 hours in Low Power mode, a notch above the Series 10’s 36 hours. That fast-charging option can bring the battery level up to 80% in 30 minutes, but charging the watch for just 15 minutes can boost it for up to 8 hours. 

Hand Orellana writes in her Series 11 review, «The six-hour battery bump on the Series 11 may not sound like much on paper, but it’s given me some welcome breathing room to figure out a better charging strategy.»

The SE 3 still delivers up to 18 hours of use, or 32 hours in Low Power mode. It also supports fast charging — up to 80% in 45 minutes, or about eight hours of use from a quick 15-minute top-up.

If you want the most time between charges, the Ultra 3 is the Apple Watch to get. It can last for up to 42 hours, per Apple, or up to 72 hours in Low Power mode. Fast charging its larger battery takes it to 80% in about 45 minutes, and 15 minutes on the cable will give you roughly 12 hours of power.

Some of these gains come from Apple factoring in a night’s sleep, but credit also goes to the more power-efficient LTPO 3 screen in the Series 11 and Ultra 3.

It’s one thing to reference Apple’s claims, but what about battery life in practice? In Hand Orellana’s review of each model, she recorded even better battery life than Apple’s estimates. Keep in mind your daily usage will affect results, but here’s what she found:

Apple Watch Apple’s estimate CNET review
Series 11 24 hours 27-32 hours
Ultra 3 42 hours 45-49 hours
SE 3 18 hours 20-25 hours

Series 11 vs. Ultra 3, SE 3 health features

The Apple Watch SE line has always sacrificed some hardware and features to remain the least expensive option, and the SE 3 continues that tradition — but not to the same extent. It lacks an electrical heart sensor found in the Series 11 and Ultra 3, so it can’t take heart readings using the ECG app to look for signs of atrial fibrillation (Afib).

According to Apple, the SE 3 uses a second-generation optical heart sensor that tracks heart rate during exercise, sleep and potential emergencies — though, like all Apple Watches, it can’t detect heart attacks or measure blood oxygen. The Series 11 and Ultra 3 upgrade to third-generation optical heart sensors.

The SE 3 is also missing a water temperature sensor and depth gauge, making the Series 11 and Ultra 3 better options if you spend a lot of time in water and want to track swim workouts or shallow dives more reliably.

This year’s standout health feature is the ability to analyze data and detect signs of hypertension, or high blood pressure. «It’s not the full on-the-spot blood pressure monitoring Apple fans have long hoped for,» wrote Hand Orellana, «but it’s a major step forward — one that Apple says could help 1 million people get diagnosed with hypertension in the first year alone.» 

Like the sleep-apnea tracking introduced last year, hypertension notifications are not a screening tool; think of it as a warning system that prompts you to get checked out by your doctor. The Series 11 and Ultra 3 include this ability (sorry, SE 3), and require 30 days of data collection before triggering notifications. The Series 9, Series 10 and Ultra 2 also get hypertension notifications in WatchOS 26.

Series 11 vs. Ultra 3, SE 3 connectivity

Each Apple Watch model supports cellular connectivity, so you can stay connected even when your iPhone is at home. You can order the aluminum Series 11 models and the SE 3 with the cellular option; the titanium Series 11 and the Ultra 3 include it by default.

What’s unique about these watches is their support for both 5G and LTE networks, offering faster speeds and broader compatibility. Plus, they use 5G Reduced Capacity technology, which is more power efficient than the 5G networking in your iPhone.

They also support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) at 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz, Bluetooth 5.3, and L1 GPS location chips. The Ultra 3 includes dual GPS radios (L1 and L5) for more precise location tracking, especially in challenging environments like dense downtown corridors.

Plus, the Ultra 3 offers satellite connectivity directly from the watch. With a direct view of the sky, it can communicate with overhead satellites to send and receive texts, share your location, and access emergency services.

Series 11 vs. Ultra 3, SE 3 processors

One of the biggest surprises in the lineup? The Apple Watch Series 11, Ultra 3 and SE 3 all include the same S10 chip. It’s worth noting that the S10, introduced in last year’s Series 10, isn’t a new processor generation for 2025. But each watch now includes 64 gigabytes of storage, a four-core Neural Engine and a 64-bit dual-core processor.

The only significant difference is that the Apple Watch SE 3 is the only model not to feature Apple’s second-generation Ultra Wideband chip, which enables precise location tracking. You can still use Find My on an iPhone (with UWB) to see if the SE 3 is with you or if you left it at home. But with the Series 11 and Ultra 3, Find My will point you in the right direction as you get closer to your mislaid watch.

WatchOS 26 on the Series 11, Ultra 3 and SE 3

Each model is preloaded with WatchOS 26, which has the new Liquid Glass interface (though in most cases, it’s quite subtle). And all models add features like the new Wrist Flick gesture, nightly sleep scores, Workout Buddy, the Notes app and live translation in Messages. The Series 11 and Ultra 3, with their upgraded sensors, also gain hypertension notifications.

Apple Watch Series 11, Ultra 3 and SE 3 specs

Apple Watch Series 11 Apple Watch Ultra 3 Apple Watch SE (3rd Gen)
Design & sizes Rectangular, 42mm, 46mm Rectangular, 49mm Rectangular, 40mm, 44mm
Display 42mm: 446 × 374 pixels; LTPO3 OLED Retina display (wide-angle) 46mm: 496 × 416 pixels; LTPO3 OLED Retina display (wide-angle) 49mm: 514 × 422 pixels; LTPO3 OLED Retina display (wide-angle, Always-On) 44mm: 368 × 448 pixels (Always-On Retina LTPO OLED)Apple 40mm: 324 × 394 pixels (Always-On Retina LTPO OLED)
Brightness Between 1 and 2000 nits Between 1 and 3000 nits Up to 1000 nits
Thickness & weight 46mm: 9.7mm; 37.8g (aluminum GPS), 36.9g (aluminum GPS+Cellular), 43.1g (titanium) 42mm: 9.7mm; 30.3g (aluminum GPS), 29.7g (aluminum GPS+Cellular), 34.6g (titanium) 49mm: 14.4mm; 61.6g (titanium) 44mm: 10.7mm; 33.0g (aluminum GPS+Cellular) 40mm: 10.7mm; 26.4g (aluminum GPS+Cellular)
Material & finish Aluminum: Jet black, rose gold or silver finish; Titanium: slate, gold or natural finish with sapphire crystal display (titanium) Titanium, natural or black finish with sapphire crystal display (titanium) 100% recycled aluminum, midnight and starlight
Durability 2X more scratch resistant glass (aluminum), 5ATM Water + IP6X (dust) Water resistance 100m; dust IP6X, scuba to 40m, tested to MIL-STD 810H Cover glass is 4X times more resistant to cracks than the SE 2; made of Ion-X glass. Water resistant up to 50 meters
Battery life Up to 24 hours, up to 38 hours Low Power (always-on) + Fast charge: 80% in 30 min, 100% in 60 min Up to 42 hours; up to 72 hours Low Power. Fast charge to 80% in 45 min, 100% charge 75 min All-day, 18-hour battery life. Fast charging with 8 hours of normal use in just 15 minutes on the charger
Sensors ECG, 3rd-gen optical heart sensor, skin temp, depth gauge, SpO2, Noise monitoring, water temperature, compass ECG, 3rd-gen optical heart sensor, skin temp, depth gauge, SpO2, Noise monitoring, water temperature, compass Wrist temperature, Second-generation optical heart sensor
Emergency features Satellite SOS, Emergency SOS, Fall detection, Crash detection, Check in and Backtrack Satellite SOS, Emergency SOS, Fall detection, Crash detection, Check in and Backtrack Fall Detection, Crash Detection, Emergency SOS, and Check In
AI & coaching Siri (voice assistant); Workout Buddy Siri (voice assistant); Workout Buddy On-device Siri, Workout Buddy
Processor S10 SiP with 64-bit dual-core processor, W3 Apple wireless chip S10 SiP with 64-bit dual-core processor, W3 Apple wireless chip S10 SiP with 64-bit dual-core processor, W3 Apple wireless chip
RAM/Storage 64GB (storage) 64GB (storage) 64GB (storage)
Payments Apple Pay Apple Pay Apple Pay
Price (US) $399-$750 (titanium) $799 $249 (starting)

Continue Reading

Technologies

NASA Admits Fault in Starliner Test Flight, Classifies It as ‘Type A’ Mishap

Remember the astronauts who were stranded in space for months? NASA says it’s close to identifying the «true technical root cause» of the spaceship malfunctions.

NASA has been investigating the now-infamous Boeing Starliner incident since the story dominated headlines in late 2024 and early 2025. The Starliner suffered malfunctions that stranded now-retired astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore for months. The agency has now released a report on what happened, taking responsibility for its role in the mission’s failure. 

«The Boeing Starliner spacecraft has faced challenges throughout its uncrewed and most recent crewed missions,» said NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman in a NASA blog post on Thursday. «While Boeing built Starliner, NASA accepted it and launched two astronauts into space. The technical difficulties encountered during docking with the International Space Station were very apparent.»

NASA has now labelled the mission a «Type A mishap,» which is defined as a «total direct cost of mission failure and property damage greater than $2 million or more,» or where «crewed aircraft hull loss has occurred.» Both of those apply to the Starliner, which has cost the agency $4.2 billion to date. 

Isaacman also released a letter addressed to all NASA employees on X. The letter outlined various issues with the mission, including a «prior OFT thruster risk that was never fully understood,» disagreements among leadership about Williams and Wilmore’s return options, and the agency’s delay in declaring the mission a failure, despite its high-profile nature clearly showing it was. 

These sentiments were echoed in NASA’s press conference on Thursday. 

NASA has committed to working with Boeing to make the Starliner launch-worthy again and has been investigating technical issues and addressing them since the mishap early last year. Isaacman admitted at the press conference that the «true technical root cause» of the malfunctions still hasn’t been identified, but NASA believes it is close to identifying it. 

«We’re not starting from zero here,» Isaacman told a reporter during the press conference. «We’re sharing the results of multiple investigations that will be coming to light in the hours and days ahead. Boeing and NASA have been working to try and understand these technical challenges during that entire time period.»

A malfunction to remember

The crewed Starliner flight was delayed several times before finally launching on June 5, 2024. The crew experienced malfunctions en route to the ISS, including several thruster failures, which made docking particularly stressful. 

The Starliner’s return was delayed by two weeks before finally being sent home without Wilmore and Williams, who were left stranded on the ISS until returning with Crew-9 in March 2025

The Starliner’s story is far from over. NASA and Boeing intend to send the Starliner back to the ISS in an uncrewed resupply mission with a launch date currently set for April 2026.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Let T-Mobile Pick Up the Tab. Get a Free iPhone 17 With a New Line

If you’ve been looking to add a new line or switch carriers, you can scoop up Apple’s latest flagship on T-Mobile’s dime.

Apple’s new iPhone 17 typically costs $830 for the 256GB configuration, or up to $1,030 for the 512GB configuration. However, T-Mobile isoffering it to customers for free if they meet certain qualifications. If you’ve been looking to trade in your old device or choose an eligible plan, now is a great time to nab this deal.

T-Mobile doesn’t mention a deadline for this deal’s end, but it’s best to act fast if you’ve been wanting the latest iPhone.

To get a free iPhone 17, you’ll need to switch to T-Mobile on an Experience Beyond or Experience More plan and open a new line. You can also choose a Better Value plan, but you must add at least three lines with that plan to get your phone. You can also add a new line on a qualifying plan to score the deal, so long as you also have an eligible device to trade in.

Buyers are still responsible for the $35 activation fee. You’ll get bill credits for 24 months that amount to your phone’s cost. Additionally, you can only get up to four devices with a new line on a qualifying plan.

Note that newer phones will net you more trade-in credits, but an iPhone 6 will net you at least $400 off. The iPhone 17 Pro is also free with a trade-in of an eligible device on an Experience Beyond plan. The iPhone 17 Pro Max is just over $4 per month right now, with the same qualifications.

We’ve also got a list of the best phone deals, if you’d like to shop around.

Why this deal matters

The iPhone 17 series is the latest in Apple’s ecosystem. These smartphones are made to work with Apple Intelligence, include faster chips, offer improved camera performance and show off Apple’s trademark gorgeous design. Starting at $830, they’re not the cheapest phones around, so carrier deals like this one are the best way to save some serious cash.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media