Connect with us

Technologies

AirPods Pro 3 vs. AirPods Pro 2: Should You Upgrade?

Here’s a look at the key differences between Apple’s latest flagship noise-canceling earbuds compared with their predecessor.

With Apple releasing the AirPods Pro 3, folks who already own the AirPods Pro 2 may be wondering whether it’s worth upgrading. 

A good portion of my full review of the AirPods Pro 3 is devoted to discussing the differences between the two models. Here’s how I conclude my review: «Several new features, such as Live Translation, will be available for the AirPods Pro 2, so many AirPods Pro 2 owners won’t feel the need to upgrade right away. But if you’ve been using AirPods Pro 2 for a while, it might be worth passing them on to a friend or relative and upgrading to the Pro 3s.»

Read more: Best wireless earbuds of 2025

AirPods Pro 3 vs. AirPods Pro 2: What’s stayed the same

  • The AirPods Pro 3’s list price is still $249 (£219, AU$429). That wasn’t a given with all the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration tariffs, but we’ll see how the price shakes out on Amazon and other retailers, where AirPods models often get discounted.
  • The AirPods Pro 3 are powered by Apple’s H2 chip, the same one that powers the AirPods Pro 2, AirPods 4 and Beats Powerbeats Pro 2. Rumors pointed to an H3 chip, but that didn’t happen. 
  • No new color options; white is still the only option.
  • The AirPods Pro 3 stick with Bluetooth 5.3, just like the AirPods Pro 2 (though some true-wireless earbuds have already jumped to Bluetooth 6.0).
  • The buds still feature a MagSafe charging case with USB-C and wireless charging. However, no USB-C charging cable is included (Apple also left out a charging cable with the AirPods 4, though most people have a USB-C cable). 

AirPods Pro 3 vs. AirPods Pro 2: What’s changed

  • While they look similar to the previous model, the AirPods Pro 3 have been redesigned. Their geometric shape has changed a bit, with the angle of the bud shifted. They’re the same length but slightly smaller width-wise, slightly larger depth-wise and weigh a touch more (5.55 grams vs. 5.3 grams on the AirPods Pro 2).
  • The AirPods Pro 3 come with new foam-infused silicone eartips in five sizes, including a new extra-extra small size.
  • The AirPods Pro 3 are equipped with heart-rate sensors like the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2.
  • 2x better noise cancellation compared to the AirPods Pro 2, according to Apple.
  • While the AirPods Pro 3 have 10.7mm drivers like the AirPods Pro 2, those drivers have been upgraded to take advantage of the buds’ new multiport acoustic architecture, which moves more air through the buds and improves sound quality.
  • The AirPods Pro 3’s microphones have been upgraded.
  • The AirPods Pro 3’s Transparency Mode has been enhanced.
  • New Live Translation feature (also available for the AirPods Pro 2 and AirPods 4 series, but not the Beats Powerbeats Pro 2).
  • The AirPods Pro 3’s battery life has improved to 8 hours with noise cancellation on and up to 10 hours in Hearing Aid mode with transparency on. The AirPods Pro 2 are rated for up to 6 hours of battery life with noise-canceling on.
  • Instead of being IPX4 splash-proof like the AirPods Pro 2, the AirPods Pro 3 got an IP57 rating (so did their charging case), which means they can withstand a sustained spray of water. (I poured water on them and they survived just fine.) They’re also dust-resistant.
  • The AirPods Pro’s case now includes a U2 chip, boosting Precision Finding range in the Find My app by 1.5x (requires an iPhone 17). The AirPods Pro 2’s case has the U1 chip.
  • Like with the AirPods 4, the AirPods Pro 3’s case no longer has a button for Bluetooth pairing. You simply double-tap on the front of the case to put the buds into Bluetooth pairing mode. The AirPods Pro 2 have a physical button for Bluetooth pairing. 

The AirPods Pro 3’s new geometric shape and eartips are among the biggest changes

While the AirPods Pro 3 and AirPods Pro 2 look very similar at first glance, they do feel different in your ears. That’s because the AirPods Pro 3’s new eartips are made of silicone but infused with foam toward the front of the ear tip. Also, the angle of the bud has been adjusted so the eartips point more directly into your ear canals. 

If you’re someone who couldn’t quite get a good fit with the original AirPods Pro or Pro 2, the new design could very well help you get a snugger, more secure fit. The fact is that a tight seal is crucial for optimal sound and noise-canceling performance, and Apple redesigned the eartips to make sure users could hear the sound and noise-canceling upgrades with the AirPods Pro 3.

Alas, the new AirPods Pro 3 tips don’t work with earlier AirPods Pro models; they attach differently. 

Do you really need the AirPods Pro 3’s heart-rate monitoring?

I personally don’t feel that heart-rate monitoring is a must-have feature, particularly if you already own a smartwatch with the feature. But for some folks, it will be a welcome addition. The heart-rate sensors have been custom-designed for the AirPods Pro 3 (they’re Apple’s smallest heart-rate sensors) and aren’t identical to the ones in the Powerbeats Pro 2, but the experience using the heart-rate monitoring feature is the same.

How much better are the AirPods Pro 3 than the AirPods Pro 2?

It’s always hard to put an exact percentage on how improved one generation of a product is to the next, and there are always some people who will prefer the older model for whatever reason. But for me, the AirPods Pro 3 are about 20-25% better. 

While they both use the H2 chip, the newest AirPods have been redesigned on the outside and inside, and most people should notice the improvements to sound quality, noise cancellation and fit. 

If you own the original AirPods Pro, I wouldn’t hesitate to recommend upgrading, especially if your battery life has decreased. 

If you’re happy with your AirPods Pro 2, there’s no hurry to upgrade unless your battery life has become an issue (some people have the older AirPods Pro 2 with a Lightning connector for charging instead of USB-C). The previous generation supports most of the same features as the AirPods Pro 3 (aside from heart-monitoring), including Live Translation and Hearing Aid mode.

It’s worth pointing out that the AirPods Pro 3 offer slightly better speech clarity for Hearing Aid mode (with Automatic Conversation Boost) and better battery life — up to 10 hours with Transparency and Hearing Aid mode. That makes the AirPods 3 the better choice if you have small to moderate hearing loss and plan to use your AirPods as hearing aids. 

AirPods Pro 2 vs. AirPods Pro 3 vs. AirPods 4 with ANC spec comparison

AirPods Pro 2 AirPods Pro 3 AirPods 4 with ANC
Weight (each earbud) 0.19 ounce (5.13 grams) 0.20 ounce (5.5 grams) 0.15 ounce (4.3 grams)
Weight (case) 1.79 ounces (50.8 grams) 1.55 ounces (43.99 grams) 1.22 ounces (34.7 grams)
Water resistant IPX4 IP57 IP54
Sensors Skin-detect sensor, Optical in-ear sensor, Motion-detecting accelerometer,
Speech-detecting accelerometer, Force sensor
Skin-detect sensor, Optical in-ear sensor, Motion-detecting accelerometer,
Speech-detecting accelerometer, Force sensor, heart-rate sensor
Optical in-ear sensor, Motion-detecting accelerometer,
Speech-detecting accelerometer, Force sensor
Microphones Dual beamforming microphones, inward-facing microphone Dual beamforming microphones, inward-facing microphone Dual beamforming microphones, inward-facing microphone
Chip H2 H2 H2
Conectivity Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.3 Bluetooth 5.3
Active Noise Cancelation,
Transparency mode
Yes Yes Yes
Conversation Awareness,
Adaptive Audio
Yes Yes Yes
Voice Isolation,
Personalized volume
Yes Yes Yes
Battery life Up to 6 hours
+30 hours with case
Up to 8 hours
+24 hours with case
Up to 5 hours
+30 hours with case
Wire in box Yes No No
Launch Price $249 $249 $179

Technologies

Formula E’s New Electric Racing Car Is Faster Than a Formula 1 Car. What We Know So Far

The jaw-droppingly quick new Gen4 car will be raced in the 2026-27 season of Formula E, where there are hopes it will attract more fans to the motorsport.

Continue Reading

Technologies

I Used the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s Bizarre-Looking Hasselblad Lens and Here’s Everything It Can Do

The Hasselblad teleconverter lens adds a 10x optical zoom to the Oppo Find X9 Pro’s 200-megapixel camera. It’s expensive but the results are fantastic.

The Oppo Find X9 Pro has a range of upgrades, including a new 200-megapixel telephoto camera with 3x optical zoom, which boasts several nifty zoom features to help you take a great photo no matter how far away you are from your subject.

For example, it delivers excellent shots at 6x by cropping into the sensor for 50-megapixel photos. Oppo says that it can deliver «lossless zoom» up to 13.2x using computational photography — that’s close to the max digital zoom on phones from a few years ago. And if that’s not enough for you, the Find X9 Pro also supports an external Hasselblad telephoto lens accessory, which further zooms into distant subjects.

Out of these three, the detachable telephoto lens is the most wild. When attached, the Hasselblad lens sticks out several inches from the back of the phone. It somewhat resembles a mini-telescope.

Oppo isn’t the first to make such an accessory; both Vivo and Xiaomi have done it before. However, Oppo’s take is different than the rest. While others offer a camera grip with a shutter button, Oppo’s Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit relies on the phone’s Quick Control hardware button or the on-screen shutter button to shoot the photos.

I’ve been using it a lot recently and here’s what it can do. I should note that the Oppo Find X9 Pro isn’t available in the US.

Using the Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit is kind of a hassle

The Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit comes with three pieces: a snap-on camera module attachment, the telephoto lens itself and a brace that can screw into a tripod for stability.

To use it, you also need to have the official Magnetic Photographer Case, which is purpose-built to support the slide-on attachment. You can then add the lens with a twist, which clicks securely into place over the 200-megapixel telephoto camera.

The external lens accessory is heavy, making the phone unbalanced and unwieldy. I got used to it, but it took a day to figure out how to hold the phone and lens combo most effectively. However, I sorely miss that there’s no camera grip to provide a secure hold for the phone when the lens is mounted. If I move my hand for a more comfortable hold or to tap the screen for long zoom shots, my framing is significantly altered. If I were to change one thing about this teleconverter kit, I’d add a camera grip to make this setup more comfortable to use.

You can use a tripod to brace the lens, which helps stabilize your shots in the viewfinder; however, this is counterproductive to the idea of using a phone to take photos in the first place. I don’t want to carry a tripod — at that point, I might as well just use a dedicated camera and telephoto lens. After all, the whole purpose of having a portable tele lens is to minimize bulk.

And yet, I love using it

The first time you add the Hasselblad lens and open the Camera app, you might be surprised to see the viewfinder upside down. To counter this, you need to go to the dedicated Hasselblad Teleconverter mode under the More menu.

Besides flipping the viewfinder the correct way, it gives you 10x, 20x and 40x zoom options. You can always use the slider to adjust the magnification between 10x and 200x. I used it for a day in Barcelona and loved the natural depth it added to human subjects. I was also surprised by some lowlight results. 

Here are few of my favorite photos that I shot on the Oppo Find X9 Pro using the Hasselblad Teleconverter Kit:

I saw a person skateboarding after setting up my camera and kept tapping the shutter button in hopes of getting an action shot. I love how this came out because there’s no motion blur on the person or his skateboard. These kinds of shots require a fast shutter speed to freeze the moment, and the Oppo Find X9 Pro was able to do so at 10x zoom using an external lens. The colors are accurate, the contrast is nice and there’s a good bokeh despite having a moving subject.

When setting up this shot, I tapped on the yacht to move the focus point from the person sitting on the seaside. At 20x zoom, it captured a nice-looking shot but if you look closely, the details are missing from the faces of the people on the yacht. It’s because the camera moved slightly when I was adjusting the focus and trying to capture the photo. Overall, I still prefer the Hasselblad lens and Oppo combination for accurately capturing the colors of a sunset.

At 40x zoom, the Hasselblad teleconverter lens captures softer images and the details go for a toss. But its processing still retains the mood and feel of the frame which is just as important as getting sharp details. It gets the colors right and there’s a decent bokeh. It can also track faces to determine the subject, even at 50x zoom and, like in the above shot, you get decent clarity.

If you have a still subject, the external Hasselblad lens adds a DSLR-like shallow depth of field. It was even able to capture the woman’s hair strands in a windy environment. I love this photo because no portrait mode was used and that bokeh is the lens’ natural bokeh just like you’d get from a DSLR or mirrorless camera. It offers a similar shallow depth of field at 20x for still subjects.

For this photo, I tapped the wall for focus, which also adjusted the exposure and white balance automatically. Too many similar shots from other phones suffer from overprocessing, but not this one. I’m impressed by how it was able to expose for the light, without blowing out the highlights to white. The people were properly exposed without me needing to tap on either for focus and exposure. It also got the mood right in the process.

However, using the lens in low-light settings, like above, adds a lot of noise reduction and tends to give photos a soft, blurry watercolor look. The above shot was also captured at 10x and there’s light over the subject’s face, but the overall look is soft with fewer details. That said, it gives the photo a unique look, which I don’t dislike.

This is also a tap-lock-on-the-subject-and-shoot image, where I [the subject] was moving and the system was able to track my face to focus better. I love the photo’s contrasty look. In anything less than direct sunlight, the Hasselblad lens softens the subject, but the photos still come out looking great.

I like having the ability to expand my phone’s zooming capabilities for both photos and videos. However, the Hasselblad Lens Converter kit remains more of a novelty than something you’d use every day, mostly thanks to its price. While it’s fascinating how close you can get to distant subjects without losing much image quality, at 499 euros (roughly $575), it’s one of the most expensive phone accessories you can buy.

At that price, I’d expect it to function better with my phone. For instance, I’d like the camera software to be able to detect that I’ve attached an external lens, so it would open in the Hasselblad Teleconverter mode by default — rather than giving me a black viewfinder.

The Hasselblad Teleconverter kit is one of the most expensive phone accessories on the market. But if you can afford it, the lens adds a lovely natural bokeh to photos while retaining a scene’s natural colors. It also outputs excellent night shots. It might not be the best value but I can’t seem to put it down.

Continue Reading

Technologies

NASA’s Escapade Mission May Finally Reveal How the Martian Atmosphere Works

NASA, Blue Origin and UC Berkeley combined efforts for NASA’s lowest-cost mission to Mars.

Sending anything to Mars is a much more difficult process than it seems. In the 1960s, the Soviet Union tried (and failed) in its first nine consecutive attempts, and the US was only able to succeed in quick flybys. The losing streak came to an end in 1971 with the success of the Mariner 9, the first spacecraft to orbit another planet. 

More than 50 years later, Mars is still tough to get to, with only seven functional orbiters and two on-surface rovers still operating, most of which are run by NASA. 

On Sunday, NASA’s Escapade, a collaborative effort among the space agency, UC Berkeley and Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin, will launch and attempt to add two more orbiters to the elusive club of successful missions to Mars. Liftoff is scheduled for 2:45 p.m. ET.

The mission is simple on paper: Blue Origin’s New Glenn rocket will launch two Escapade orbiters into space on Nov. 9, depending on the weather and other factors.

Once there, the orbiters — nicknamed Blue and Gold after UC Berkeley’s school colors — will separate. This is where things get a little complicated. Blue and Gold will hang out at the L2 Earth-Sun Lagrange point, a part of space behind the Earth when viewed from the sun, where the orbiters can quite literally hang out without getting lost in space. They’ll stay there for a year before doing a quick flyby of Earth and departing for Mars. The twin orbiters are expected to arrive at the Red Planet by November 2027. 


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


Space agencies launch missions all the time but few of them have the subtext of Escapade, which has not one but three underlying storylines to pay attention to. 

New Glenn’s official debut

NASA has tapped Blue Origin’s large New Glenn rocket for the launch. New Glenn is the proverbial new kid on the block, and the Escapade mission will be the company’s first official mission into space. The rocket’s role will be to launch Escapade into orbit and then return to Earth.

Blue Origin sent New Glenn into orbit for the first time in January 2025. That mission, dubbed NG-1 by Blue Origin, showed that the rocket could launch and make it to space while demonstrating the company’s Blue Ring orbital transfer vehicle. Things didn’t exactly go as planned, however. Upon reentry, New Glenn’s first stage was unable to stick its landing, missing its target and plunging into the Atlantic Ocean, prompting an FAA investigation

For the Escapade mission, all eyes will be on whether Blue Origin will do better this time in the landing phase. Not only is this the first NASA mission for the space company, owned by the CEO of online retail giant Amazon, but it will also make its second attempt to land New Glenn’s first-stage rockets without incident. 

Should the company succeed, Blue Origin will join Elon Musk’s SpaceX as the only commercial vendors with reusable space launch vehicles. This could help reduce the cost and increase the frequency of space launches. 

The 13 lives of Escapade

One of the challenges of the Escapade mission is its budget. Missions to Mars are usually expensive. The Mars Exploration Rover mission started in 2003 and launched a year later cost a hair over $1 billion, with $744 million of it going to vehicle design and launch. Even less expensive initiatives, like the failed 1999 Mars Polar Lander, still cost well north of $100 million. 

Escapade didn’t have that budget. It’s part of NASA’s Small Innovative Missions for Planetary Exploration program. Its budget was less than $80 million, and to build the two orbiters, UC Berkeley and Rocket Lab were allocated $55 million of that total. 

«Building two interplanetary spacecraft for $55 million was never going to be simple,» Dr. Robert Lillis, associate director for Planetary Science at UC Berkeley and the Escapade mission, tells CNET. «They say ‘space is hard’ and they’re right. For us and our spacecraft partners at Rocket Lab, it was tough to build robust, well-instrumented interplanetary probes on a low budget, so challenges were many.»

Researchers at Berkeley began work on Blue and Gold in 2016, and over the years, they dealt with myriad roadblocks, including budgetary concerns, the COVID-19 pandemic, supply issues from suppliers and even personal illnesses. 

«I’ll put it this way, we have a slide deck called ‘The Nine Lives of Escapade’ and I think we’re up to 13 now,» Lillis says. «I could write a book on all the things that could’ve doomed the mission.»

The cost of admission

In 2013, the Indian Space Research Organization launched its Mars Orbital Mission, a successful attempt to put a satellite on the Red Planet. The total cost of the mission was $74 million, which undercut all other missions to Mars by a fairly significant margin when adjusting for inflation. 

Escapade’s budget is roughly the same, with NASA paying Blue Origin $20 million for use of the New Glenn rocket in addition to the $55 million given to UC Berkeley and Rocket Lab for the creation of the two orbiters. Should the mission be a success, it’ll be NASA’s first low-cost mission to go as far as Mars, and the second such mission to succeed.

Reducing the cost of admission is an important milestone for NASA. It would open up more opportunities for future Mars missions, which could help pave the way for human exploration someday, although there are many other milestones that need to be hit before that can happen.

UC Berkeley and Rocket Lab successfully developed two orbiters that will spend their lifetimes scanning Mars’ magnetic field to gain a deeper understanding of its history, all while operating within a budget that may make future missions to Mars more frequent and affordable. 

The Martian magnetosphere

Despite being one of Earth’s closest neighbors, there are still a lot of question marks surrounding Mars. It’s pretty well established that the planet had water at some point. Over the span of its history, the Martian magnetosphere started getting stripped away by solar winds, making it nearly impossible for water to continue to exist. 

Science has a limited set of data that comes from single orbiters over the span of decades and Escapade hopes to fix that by having two orbiters that follow each other so that researchers can get more consistent measurements of the Martian magnetosphere. As Lillis says, the magnetosphere on Mars changes by the minute, so waiting for a single orbiter to circle back around leaves a lot of those changes unmeasured. 

«With a single orbiter, we could measure conditions in the upstream solar wind, but then have to wait a couple of hours before the spacecraft orbit brought us into the upper atmosphere to measure the rates of atmospheric escape,» Lillis said. «That’s too long: We know the space weather propagates through the system in only one or two minutes.»

The ultimate purpose of the mission is to measure and observe how solar weather interacts with the Martian magnetosphere. Per Lillis, solar winds have been eroding the magnetosphere on Mars, similar to how water erodes rock in a river. Escapade will help science determine how fast and how much of the magnetosphere has eroded under the sun’s constant onslaught. 

Because space weather can be so unpredictable and the existing data is spread out too far in terms of time, researchers aren’t quite sure what they’re going to find when they get there. Berkeley has simulation models that can predict things over the span of hours. Lillis says that the data from Escapade’s two-orbiter setup will help fill in a lot of those gaps.

«With Escapade, we can measure cause and effect at the same time, i.e., the solar wind and upper atmosphere simultaneously,» says Lillis. «To start to understand this highly dynamic system, we need that cause and effect perspective.» 

You can watch the livestream of the Escapade mission launch on Sunday, at Blue Origin’s website.

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media