Connect with us

Technologies

I Tested the Amazfit Bip 6. It’s Proof Good Smartwatches Don’t Need to Cost a Fortune

After wearing it for a month, I’d say the $80 Amazfit Bip 6 checks (almost) every box — as long as you can live with a few rough edges.

Our Experts

Headshot of Vanessa Hand Orellana
Vanessa Hand Orellana Lead Writer
Vanessa is a lead writer at CNET, reviewing and writing about the latest smartwatches and fitness trackers. She joined the brand first as an on-camera reporter for CNET’s Spanish-language site, then moved on to the English side to host and produce some of CNET’s videos and YouTube series. When she’s not testing out smartwatches or dropping phones, you can catch her on a hike or trail run with her family.
Expertise Consumer Technology, Smart Home, Family, Apps, Wearables
Why You Can Trust CNET
16171819202122232425+

Years of Experience

14151617181920212223

Hands-on Product Reviewers

6,0007,0008,0009,00010,00011,00012,00013,00014,00015,000

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET’s expert staff reviews and rates dozens of new products and services each month, building on more than a quarter century of expertise.

I’ll admit I judged the Amazfit Bip 6 by its low price tag. At $80, I didn’t expect it to hold its own, let alone compete with higher-end smartwatch rivals. But after a week of testing, I can say it’s more than just a good deal.  

At a time when most smartwatches cost hundreds of dollars, the Bip 6 stands out because it goes beyond the basics. In my time testing the Bip 6, I found the fitness tracking to be solid, the advanced health metrics to be accurate and the battery life to last more than a week on a charge. Add in the fact that it works on Android and iPhone, and you have one of the few sub-$100 smartwatches that’s actually worth your time. 

8.5/ 10
SCORE

Amazfit Bip 6

Pros

  • $80 price is much less than most watches
  • Works with Android and iOS
  • Great battery life (lasts a week with heavy use)
  • Tracks a wide variety of fitness activities accurately
  • Temperature tracking and advanced sleep monitoring

Cons

  • Single sizing option (44mm)
  • UI and app are unintuitive
  • Some health metrics are hard to interpret
  • Voice assistant is unreliable
  • Bluetooth range is short (especially on iPhone)

It’s not the most refined watch out there. Design and navigation feel clunky compared to pricier models, but this feels like a small price to pay (pun intended) for everything else the Amazfit Bip 6 delivers on. 

If you’re after function over polish, the Amazfit Bip 6 makes for an easy, affordable entry point into the smartwatch world. It’s ideal for first-time smartwatch buyers who want to explore health and fitness tracking without spending big, and particularly appealing to iPhone users curious about smartwatches but hesitant to commit to an Apple Watch.

Amazfit Bip 6 design 

The Amazfit Bip 6’s design is simple and functional. It has the boxy, flat look of an old Pebble Watch, with a slight curve to the screen and a metal trim that gives it a bit of polish. The 1.97-inch AMOLED display (390 x 450 pixels) looks bright and crisp indoors but I struggle seeing what’s on screen in direct sunlight. While it feels light, the 44mm watch looks bulky on my medium-sized wrist (6.5 inches), and it doesn’t come in any other size.

My review unit came with the black sport band but it’s also available in charcoal, stone and red (which I might’ve preferred). All the bands lean to the sporty side of the design spectrum and there’s no real way to dress it up unless you go with an alternative band from Amazon. 

Amazfit Bip 6 setup and software

Right out of the box, the Bip 6 doesn’t offer the smoothest onboarding experience and it took me a bit of fine-tuning to get the watch set up the way I like. I swapped out the default watch face, adjusted battery settings to keep the screen on during workouts (there’s no true always-on display) and customized which fitness metrics I wanted to appear during my runs. It also took a little trial and error to figure out what the physical button and various swipe gestures actually do. It’s not as intuitive as other smartwatches like the Galaxy or Apple Watch, but if you dig deep enough in settings, you should find a way to make it work.

Even with those tweaks, I still ran into some UI quirks. The font, for example, is too large and uses a billboard-style animation to reveal text that doesn’t fit on the screen — making it hard to read at a glance. The screen feels sluggish, with noticeable lag after selecting an option.

The Bip 6’s voice assistant, Flow, is perhaps its most obvious weakness. Flow somehow makes Siri seem like a damn mind reader. I usually rely on voice commands for quick tasks like setting a timer or replying to messages and while Flow claims to handle these, it rarely gets things right on the first try. I found myself screaming at my wrist, which I’m not proud to admit. Even when it did understand the assignment, the lag between recognizing my request and responding was so long that I was better off just tapping through the menus and doing things on my own. 

Fortunately Android phone users can reply to texts with a keyboard or dictation but iPhone owners are out of luck unless they go through a third-party app workaround. It doesn’t help that Flow functionality relies on the phone and the Bluetooth range (at least with an iPhone) is frustratingly short. I often lost connection when my phone was just one room away. This makes the Find My Phone feature pretty useless if you depend on it as a lifeline to locate your phone. 

Once I got past those early growing pains, though, the rest of the experience was much smoother sailing.

Amazfit Bip 6 battery life

Battery life is easily one of the Bip 6’s strongest features. I put it through the paces, including multiple GPS workouts, heart rate tracking and using the always-on display during runs and it still managed to get more than a week on a single charge — 8 days to be exact. Had I been more conservative with the settings, I likely would’ve come close to the two-week promise the company boasts. Higher end rivals like the Apple Watch, Galaxy Watch and Pixel Watches need charging after a day and a half. Even the more expensive Apple Watch Ultras with larger batteries don’t last longer than three days on a charge.

When you finally do have to go back for a charge, however, it’ll take about two hours to go from zero to full and there’s no fast-charging option that I know of. Although I’ll take longer lasting battery life over faster charging any day, I’d rather leave it charging overnight once a week rather than having to figure out a time during the day to charge it back up. You’ll also have to supply your own USB-C charging cable (and brick), as the box only includes a magnetic charging puck that needs to be plugged in. Most new watches like the Pixel Watch and the Apple Watch have stopped including the charging brick but do provide the charging cable.

Amazfit Bip 6 fitness features

To say the watch covers fitness tracking basics would be underselling it. It has all the workouts you’d ever need plus nuanced metrics for runners and other popular sports. I mainly tested the running workouts as that’s my primary form of exercise. 

Tracking a run on the Bip 6 feels shaky at first — it takes about 10 seconds to lock onto a GPS signal, which can be a momentum killer when you’re ready to hit the pavement. But once it locks in, it’s off to the races. In multiple runs, the GPS worked reliably even without my phone. Heart rate tracking, including zone breakdowns, held up surprisingly well. The data was on par with the Polar chest strap HR monitor (the gold standard for consumer heart rate tracking) which I use to test smartwatches. The Bip 6 was slower at detecting spikes as I approached my peak but that’s a common shortcoming of wrist-based monitors — not something unique to this device. If you’re willing to dig into the Zepp app (more on this later) you’ll also find nuanced metrics like cadence and stride to help you analyze your run.

It did hit a bump in bright sunlight, though, as the screen doesn’t get bright enough to read outdoors. 

For indoor workouts, it tracks strength training and even attempts to identify which muscle groups you’re using. I didn’t do a traditional strength workout so accuracy is still TBD but it did correctly flag arm muscles during a Pilates session I had labeled as strength training for testing purposes.

Amazfit Bip 6 health and wellness

The Bip 6 had a hard time telling the difference between when I was sleeping and when I was watching White Lotus and gave me about an hour’s worth of sleep «extra credit» on weekend nights when I was very much awake. It’s worth noting that the Apple Watch has made the same mistake in the past, which makes me question how lucid I actually am when I’m lying comatose on the couch at the end of the day. 

The actual measurements, however, are very helpful, as it measures heart rate and temperature variations, sleep stages and breathing quality. This could potentially help signal the onset of diseases similar to the vitals check on other wearables like the Oura ring and Apple Watch. 

The Bip 6 also offers a vitals check outside of sleep mode called One Tap Measuring, which collects your heart rate, SpO₂, stress and breathing rate in a single read. You can even track your menstrual cycle on the watch but it doesn’t factor skin temperature into the ovulation predictions like other health wearables. 

And if you really want to dig into your sleep and health data, you can subscribe to the Zepp Aura add-on, which offers advanced sleep analysis, AI-powered coaching and tools that can help flag conditions like sleep apnea and insomnia. It’s currently on sale for $60 a year (normally $150).

I also had a bit of trouble blocking notifications during sleep and I had to set up the «do not disturb» mode manually because it didn’t mirror what I had set up on my phone. 

Amazfit Bip 6’s Zepp App

The problem with all this health data is that it comes with little to no context. Whether you’re looking at the immediate results on the watch or reviewing long-term health trends in the Zepp app, there’s no guidance on what the numbers mean, what’s considered normal or how to take action based on them. Maybe the Aura premium option helps make sense of it all, but I didn’t test it for this review.

The watch runs on Amazfit’s proprietary Zepp OS, with all your data and settings managed through the Zepp app on your phone. It handles everything from system settings and health metrics to the app and watch face stores. But good luck finding what you need because the Zepp app’s interface is not intuitive and layers tabs upon tabs.

Even when you do find the tab you need, the data itself is often hard to understand. As someone who’s reviewed smartwatches and fitness wearables for more than a decade, I consider myself well-versed in fitness lingo but even I found myself questioning what some of these scores meant.

Take the Readiness Score, which sits right at the top of the dashboard claiming its importance without telling you why. I had to dig deep to figure out it’s calculated using a mix of sleep, exertion, skin temperature and heart rate. But even then, I wasn’t sure what I was supposed to be ready for. To function? To work out? To parent? I assume it’s similar to Garmin’s Body Battery, which I usually ignore anyway. As a working mom of three, I don’t have the luxury of waiting around for a good score to give me permission to exercise. If I don’t squeeze in a workout during the one 30-minute window I get to myself, it’s just not happening. Ready or not.

Then there’s the PAI (Personal Activity Intelligence) score, which, according to the app, reflects your physical condition. More digging revealed you’re supposed to keep it above 100 to reduce your risk of cardiovascular disease and boost life expectancy. All good in theory but by the time I finished decoding what the PAI and Readiness scores were, I was too far down the rabbit hole and more ready to lie down than to take action on my metrics.

Another bonus feature is an AI-powered food journal that automatically populates calorie and nutritional information from a photo or barcode. I tested it with a home made cheese sandwich, and it was surprisingly accurate in calculating calorie count, which I later cross referenced with the actual nutrition information of each ingredient. I can see this being a practical tool for people who like to keep track of intake for weight management but didn’t log long term for a comprehensive analysis of this feature. 

Amazfit Bip 6 final verdict

The Amazfit Bip 6 is a functional, subdued powerhouse that won’t dazzle you at first glance but will consistently overdeliver where it counts. It’s the kind of rare find that you don’t expect to come across in the sub-$100 smartwatch world and easily the best option we’ve tested in its price range.

Technologies

Internet Providers Can Monitor Their Own Cybersecurity Standards, Says Trump’s FCC

Continue Reading

Technologies

Today’s NYT Mini Crossword Answers for Friday, Nov. 21

Here are the answers for The New York Times Mini Crossword for Nov. 21.

Looking for the most recent Mini Crossword answer? Click here for today’s Mini Crossword hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Wordle, Strands, Connections and Connections: Sports Edition puzzles.


Need some help with today’s Mini Crossword? It’s not too tough today, but read on for the answers. And if you could use some hints and guidance for daily solving, check out our Mini Crossword tips.

If you’re looking for today’s Wordle, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands answers, you can visit CNET’s NYT puzzle hints page.

Read more: Tips and Tricks for Solving The New York Times Mini Crossword

Let’s get to those Mini Crossword clues and answers.

Mini across clues and answers

1A clue: Pump iron
Answer: LIFT

5A clue: Peer
Answer: EQUAL

7A clue: Like the music of Rick James and James Brown
Answer: FUNKY

8A clue: Animal that can’t change its stripes, per an old adage
Answer: TIGER

9A clue: Pointed part of a fork
Answer: TINE

Mini down clues and answers

1D clue: Dominant hand for Shohei Ohtani when batting, but not pitching
Answer: LEFT

2D clue: Resignation proclamation
Answer: IQUIT

3D clue: Mushrooms, mold, mildew, etc.
Answer: FUNGI

4D clue: «Is this seat ___?»
Answer: TAKEN

6D clue: U-shaped instrument in ancient Greece
Answer: LYRE

Continue Reading

Technologies

Best Budget Noise-Canceling Headphones Under $100 for 2025

Get a set of premium noise-canceling headphones that are great for a budget.

Why You Can Trust CNET
30+

Years of Experience

35

Product Reviewers

15k

Sq. Feet of Lab Space

CNET staff — not advertisers, partners or business interests — determine how we review products and services. If you buy through our links, we may earn a commission.

What to consider

How cheap?

You’d be surprised what difference an additional $20 makes when buying budget headphones.

Design

The right design, especially weight, means a lot for how headphones fit your head.

Comfort

Whether you’re only wearing these every couple of days or you plan to rarely take them off, the right headphones make a huge difference.

Durability

If headphones look cheap, there’s a good chance they may not last long.

Return policy

Know where you’re buying from, and what options are available to you if you end up not enjoying your purchase.

vs

Compare
Back to selection

Editor’s note, Nov. 20: Black Friday falls on Nov. 28 and Cyber Monday is on Dec. 1, but the holiday deals are already in full swing. That means there should be plenty of opportunities to save on noise-canceling headphones and earbuds, as many top headphone brands, including Apple, Sony and Bose, discount certain models to their lowest prices of the year — or close to their lowest prices. Several models on this list should be on sale.

After evaluating hundreds of wireless headphones over the last 10 years, I always look forward to testing the latest top premium noise-canceling models from Sony, Bose, Apple, Bowers & Wilkins and others. But I know a lot of people can’t afford those higher-end models or simply don’t want to spend that much on a headphone. That’s why I’m always on the lookout for value noise-canceling headphone options that fit comfortably and perform well for their more modest prices. While you probably aren’t going to get audiophile-grade sound in a sub-$100 headphone, you can get a set of cans that sounds quite good and has solid noise-canceling and voice-calling performance. If you prefer earbuds to over-ear headphones, I also have a lists for best cheap earbuds of 2025 and top wireless earbuds of 2025 that you should check out.

What’s the best cheap noise-canceling headphone overall?

The new Bose-infused Baseus Inspire XH1 lists for $150 but often sells for closer to $100 and delivers very good bang for the buck. I also like theSony CH-720N, which carries a similar street price to the Baseus and is one of my favorite value headphones.

Best cheap noise-canceling headphones for 2025

Pros

  • Comfortable fit with an attractive, sturdy design
  • Affordable price
  • Very good sound for the price
  • Decent noise-canceling and voice-calling performance
  • Strong battery life
  • Hard case included

Cons

  • Dolby Atmos Spatial Audio mode doesn’t really improve the sound
  • Noise canceling could be a little better
  • No USB-C audio or ear-detection sensors that automatically pause your music when you take the headphones off

Why I like them

Baseus has two new-for-2025 earbuds — the Inspire XP1 and Inspire XC1 — and one set of full-size headphones (the Inspire XH1) that feature Sound by Bose, and they’re all good values. They have impressive sound for their price, a more premium design than most «value» headphones and good performance overall. The XH1 are not only fairly lightweight (275 grams) and comfortable to wear, but they have decent build quality, respectable noise canceling and voice-calling performance, as well as very good battery life. I also liked how they not only fold up but fold flat and come with a carrying case and a 3.5mm cable for wired listening. Their controls for playback are also good, though I had to dig into the instructions to figure out that you hold down the volume buttons to advance tracks forward and back. Read review.

Reasons to buy

You’re looking for a comfortable, well-designed set of noise-canceling headphones that sound good and cost a lot less than premium models from Sony, Bose and others.

Reasons to skip/keep looking

Premium flagship models from Bose and Sony offer better sound and noise-canceling performance. In other words, you can only expect so much from headphones at this price.

 … Show more
Learn more

Baseus Inspire XH1 review

Pros

  • Lightweight and comfortable
  • Good sound with very good noise canceling and ambient sound mode
  • Good voice-calling performance
  • Multipoint Bluetooth
  • 35 hours of battery life
  • Robust EQ settings

Cons

  • No carrying case or pouch included
  • Missing more advanced features like ear-detection sensors, LDAC audio codec support and Sony’s Quick Attention and Speak-To-Chat

Sony’s improved entry-level noise-canceling headphones, the CH-720Ns, have a bit of a plasticky, budget vibe, but they’re lightweight and very comfortable. Part of me was expecting them to sound pretty mediocre, but I was pleasantly surprised. No, they don’t sound as good as the WH-1000XM5s. But they sound more premium than they look (and feel), and their overall performance is a step up from their predecessor, the CH-710Ns. Are they worth $150? Maybe — or maybe not. But the good news is that, like the CH-710N and WH-XB910 before them, these have already seen significant discounts, with prices dropping to as low as $90 during flash sales.

 … Show more
Get it now

Learn more

Sony CH-720N review

Pros

  • Well-designed and comfortable to wear
  • Good sound quality and noise-canceling performance
  • Strong feature set
  • Strong battery life

Cons

  • Voice-calling suffers in windy environments
  • Carrying pouch leaves headphones vulnerable to damage

Why I like them

The well-designed and comfortable JBL Live 770NC offers some modest improvements over its predecessor, including better battery life (up to 65 hours with ANC off and 50 hours with ANC on) and Bluetooth 5.3 with LE Audio (via a future firmware upgrade). Equipped with 40mm drivers, you get bold, nicely defined sound with powerful bass that’s relatively tight. JBL’s Ambient Aware and TalkThru features are on board along with multipoint Bluetooth pairing (the one feature that’s missing is ear-detection sensors that pause your music when you take the headphones off). I thought the headphones’ noise muffling capabilities were good and callers said they could hear me well even in noisier environments except when the wind picked up around me. The headphones fold up and a simple carrying pouch (no hard case) is included along with a cable for wired listening.

Reasons to buy

If you can’t afford premium noise-canceling headphones from Bose, Sony and Apple, the JBL Live 700NC are a good alternative, offering good performance for a more modest price.

Reasons to skip/keep looking

These are easier to recommend when they’re on sale for less than $200 (or even less). They’re a bargain in the $150-$170 range.

 … Show more

Pros

  • Eye-catching design with decent build quality and easilyswappable ear pads
  • Good sound quality for sub-$100 headphones with strong bass performance
  • Decent noise-canceling performance
  • Support the LDAC audio codec for Android devices
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Voice-calling performance could be a little better
  • No USB-C audio
  • A cloth carrying pouch is included but not a hard carrying case
  • No ear-detection sensors to automatically pause your music when you take the headphones off

Why I like them

Nothing started out with a few different wireless earbuds but has now branched into the over-ear headphones market with its eye-catching Nothing Headphone (1) and the budget-oriented CMF Headphone Pro, which also have a pretty unique look and feature interchangeable ear pads in a few different color options.

I was expecting all that much from these headphones, but after using them for a week, they check a lot of boxes for a top value headphone, including a comfortable fit (they pretty lightweight at 283 grams), decent build quality and good sound quality that’s highlighted by powerful bass that can be dialed up or down with a slider control on the left ear cup (you can also tweak the sound in the companion app). The Skullcandy Crusher 2 headphones have a similar slider, but the CMF’s bass doesn’t get to head-rattling levels (the Crusher 2’s bass literally makes the headphones vibrate).

The CMF Headphone Pro don’t offer quite as good sound quality (they lack a little bit of clarity) as the Baseus Inspire XH1 , which cost a little more and come with a hard carrying case instead of a cloth pouch and not only fold flat but fold up (the CMF Headphone Pro only folds flat). But like the Inspire XH1, they have support for the higher-resolution LDAC audio codec for Android users and strong battery — up to 100 hours with noise canceling off at moderate volume levels.

I should also point out that the noise-canceling is decent and that you get a good amount of passive noise isolation from the plush memory foam ear pads. While voice-calling performance is decent enough (I give it a B or even a B-), it’s far from top tier in terms of reducing background noise while picking your voice up clearly. And I felt the same way about the transparency mode. A cable is include for wired listening but there’s no USB-C audio.

Reasons to buy

The CMF offer a better design, fit and sound quality than many budget noise-canceling headphones that cost a little less. While they’re not exceptionally good in any one area, they’re solid all-around headphones that deliver good bang for the buck, especially when they go on sale for $15-$20 less. They also have customization options with the swappable ear pads.

Reasons to skip, keep looking

Not everybody will love the look of these headphones and you can only expect so much from a set of headphones in this price range from a performance standpoint (they sound quite good for the price but not great).

 … Show more

Pros

  • Comfortable fit for long wear
  • Respectable sound with punchy bass
  • Decent noise-canceling and voice-calling performance with two levels of ANC
  • Support for high-quality LDAC audio codec with compatible devices
  • Included hard carrying case and cable for wired listening

Cons

  • Bit generic looking
  • ANC disabled when in wired mode
  • They’re a bit lacking in clarity and bass definition compared to more expensive models

Why I like them

Earfun has made some very solid budget earbuds, and now it’s entered the full-size ANC headphone space with a few different over-ear models, including the Wave Pro (add the code EWPROCNET at checkout on Amazon to receive an additional 10% off). While they may not sound as good as premium noise-canceling headphones from Bose or Sony, they’re comfortable to wear, feature decent sound with punchy bass (they’re a bit lacking in clarity and bass definition compared to more expensive models), and they offer respectable noise canceling (you can toggle between two levels of ANC) and voice-calling performance. The headphones do come with a cable for wired listening — you can plug into an inflight entertainment system — but the noise canceling cuts off when you’re in wired mode, which is unfortunate.

Reasons to buy

For less than $60, you’re getting decent sounding headphones with effective noise canceling that are comfortable to wear and have long battery lfie. They’re also one of the few budget headphones that come with a carrying case.

Reasons to skip/keep looking

If you’re a critical listener, these probably aren’t for you as these headphones lack the treble clarity and bass definition found in higher-end models.

 … Show more

Pros

  • Comfortable fit for on-ear headphones
  • Folding design
  • Good sound quality
  • Active noise canceling
  • Very good battery life

Cons

  • No case included

JBL’s Live 670NC and Tune 670NC are among the relatively small number of on-ear models that offer active noise canceling. They’re both relatively affordable, but the Live 670NC version has a more premium look and feel to it, with better ear pads that are clearly more durable. It also has sound that’s a little better, with 40mm drivers that offer good detail and punchy bass. Battery life is rated at up to 65 hours (or 50 hours with ANC on), and an extra four hours of battery with just five minutes of charge. This model includes the latest Bluetooth 5.3 (with LE Audio) and multipoint Bluetooth pairing. It also has JBL’s Ambient Aware (transparency mode) and TalkThru features. It’s available in black, white, blue and sandstone and comes with a cord for wired listening.

The headphones list for $130 but regularly dip to less than $100.

 … Show more

Pros

  • Affordably priced
  • Comfortable and well-designed
  • Sound reasonably good for their low price
  • Noise-canceling does a decent job muffling ambient sound

Cons

  • No wired mode
  • Clarity could be slightly better
  • No carrying case

JLab still sells its older Studio Pro ANC wireless headphones for around $100, but its latest budget noise-canceling model is the Lux ANC Wireless. While they list for $80, they’ve dipped to as low as $46 during flash sales, and they’re a good value at $60. For budget headphones, they look pretty good (they don’t stick out from your head too much), are comfortable to wear with nicely padded ear cups and seem pretty well built (they fold up but no carrying pouch or case is included). As far as sound goes, while they just don’t offer the clarity of more premium headphones, they sound fairly decent and kick out a good amount of bass. Everything could be a little more well defined, but since they’re a bit on the warm side and have no treble harshness, you don’t experience any listening fatigue, which is one of the key things you want to avoid with headphones.

Noise canceling performance is decent (you can toggle between «smart» ANC on, ANC off and a transparency mode using the NC button on the headphones) and callers said they could hear me pretty well (though not great) when I used the headphones in the noisy streets of New York. They don’t have a port for a headphone cable so you can’t listen to them in wired mode (there’s no USB-C audio either). But they’re simple to use and the JLab companion app for iOS and Android allows you to tweak the sound profile, customize the touch controls and receive firmware updates. There’s also Bluetooth multipoint pairing and Android users can take advantage of support for Google Fast Pair and Google Find My Device.

 … Show more

Pros

  • Strong feature set
  • Very good sound quality for their price
  • Decent noise canceling and voice calling
  • LDAC audio codec support 

Cons

  • Bit bulky-looking

Available in three color options, the Soundcore Space One is Anker’s latest noise-canceling headphones. They’re a good value for around $100, offering a strong feature set along with good sound quality and performance. They can’t quite compete sound-wise with many of the premium noise-canceling models, but you don’t feel like you’re giving up that much on the sound front to save a good deal of money. They lack a bit of that natural, refined quality you look for in a great set of cans, but the Space One sounds respectable, with decent clarity and bass definition and measures up well to the more expensive Soundcore Space 45.

Noise-canceling and voice-calling performance are also good for headphones in this price range, although the transparency mode is only OK. Anker has developed a version of Sony’s Speak-to-Chat feature — Anker calls it Easy Chat — that automatically pauses your music and enters a transparency mode when you walk up to someone and start a conversation. The headphones are equipped with wear-detection sensors, a feature not usually found at this price, and include a carrying pouch. LDAC audio codec support is available for Android users.

I found them comfortable to wear, but they do look a bit bulky compared to more premium models. 

 … Show more

Pros

  • Comfortable
  • Decent build quality for their price
  • Good sound for their price
  • Good battery life

Cons

  • Voice-calling performance could be better
  • Noise-canceling performance is fine but not great

As far as sound, comfort level and build quality go, you’d be hard-pressed to do better than Anker’s Soundcore Life Q30 for the money. It doesn’t have quite the clarity or bass definition as some of the top premium models, but it’s less than a third of the price and gets you about 75% of the way there in terms of sound. It’s well-balanced overall, with punchy bass, and there’s an app that allows you to tweak the sound. Noise-canceling is good for the price, although certainly not up to the level of the Sony WH-1000XM5 or Bose QuietComfort 45 headphones. Battery life is rated at an impressive 40 hours with USB-C charging.

The only area where the Q30 falls a little short is for voice calls. It picks up your voice fine in quieter environments but it just doesn’t reduce background noise all that well. 

Compared to the Q20 (see below), the Q30 does offer improved sound (it’s not a huge difference, but it definitely is a notch up) and a more premium design. There’s also the newer Life Q35 ($100, currently out of stock), which adds support for Sony’s LDAC audio codec for high-resolution audio streaming with music services that support it. 

 … Show more

Factors to consider when buying budget ANC headphones

How cheap?

Budget active noise-canceling headphones tend to range in price from $50 to $100. The question you’ll have to ask yourself is whether you’re looking for the cheapest ANC headphones, or are you willing to spend closer to $100? There usually is a significant difference between a set of ANC cans that cost $50 to $60 and ones that cost $80 to $100, particularly when it comes to build quality. If you’re looking for a step-up in audio performance, your best bet is to stick to the higher end of a budget price range.

Design

Budget headphones tend to be a little bulkier than more premium models and can also look and feel a little, well, cheap. All our picks on this list offer a reasonably good design (at a minimum), but some are more appealing than others. Finding a design that’s appealing to you is obviously important.

Fit

It’s key that the headphones you buy fit your head well. The key to good noise canceling headphones is the fit of the ear cups around your head, so the best pair should offer a comfortable fit that’s snug, yet not too snug. Ideally, you want headphones you can wear over a day with minimal breaks. Budget headphones can offer a comfortable fit, but more premium headphones tend to feature better memory foam and more ergonomic designs. 

Durability

You want headphones that hold up well over time, so look for models that we note have sturdy build quality. Even budget models can come equipped with excellent resiliency in several tougher conditions.

Maximize performance and features for your budget

You want the best-sounding headphones with the best noise canceling, call quality and features like wireless charging for whatever you’re able to spend. Be sure to pack in as many features as you think you’ll need when choosing a set of headphones, even on a budget.

Return policy

It’s critical to buy your headphones at a retailer that has a good return policy, in case you have buyer’s remorse. Some people who are having trouble deciding between two models sometimes buy both, try them out for a few days, and then return one.

How we test budget noise-canceling headphones

We test budget noise-canceling headphones based on six key criteria: designsound qualitynoise-canceling performancevoice-calling performance, features and value

Design

We assess not only how comfortably the headphones fit (their ergonomics) but also their build quality and how well the controls are implemented. Only a few full-size headphones have water- and dust-resistance ratings, so those that are more durable are noted in this list.

Sound quality

We evaluate sound quality by listening to a set playlist of tracks from various music styles and comparing headphones to top competing products. Sonic traits such as bass definition, clarity, dynamic range and how natural the headphones sound are key factors in our assessment, especially as noise-canceling features can sometimes hinder audio production. If your biggest use case is listening to music, this factor will be a key determinant in choosing your new headphones.

Noise-canceling performance

Because each model on this list features Active Noise Canceling (ANC), we evaluate ANC performance by wearing the headphones in the same spot indoors near a noisy HVAC unit to see how well they do at muffling lower frequencies. Then we head out onto city streets to test the headphones in a real-world environment where we see how they do at muffling not only traffic noise but also people’s voices.

Additional features

Some great-sounding budget noise-canceling headphones aren’t loaded with features, but we do take into account what extra features are on board. These include everything from quick-access awareness with touch controls to transparency modes (your music pauses and the headphones open up to the outside world so you can have a conversation) to special sound modes to ear-detection sensors that automatically pause your music when you take the headphones off your ears. We also take a look at the companion/control app for the headphones (if there is one) and how user-friendly the app controls are.

Voice-calling

When we test voice-calling performance, we make calls on noisy city streets and evaluate how well the headphones or earbuds reduce background noise and how clearly callers can hear our voices.

Value

We determine value after considering the strength of the headphones against all these criteria and what they’re able to deliver compared with other models in their price class. Because the models on this list are priced similarly, we’re sure to compare each one head-to-head to deliver you the best value.

Other budget noise-canceling headphones we tested

Edifier W830NB: The Edifier W830NB remain a good value noise-canceling headphone pick. They look slightly more premium than their predecessor, W820NB Plus, and and are fairly lightweight (265 grams) and comfortable, with cushy memory foam ear pads. They also sound very good for their price, offering decent clarity and fairly well-defined bass with an amply wide sound stage (they lack the refinement and depth of higher-end headphones, but you can’t expect the world from sub-$80 headphones). You can tweak the sound profile in Edifier’s companion app for iOS and Android.

QCY H3 Pro: QCY is another Chinese brand like Tribit, Earfun and plenty of others that make budget-priced headphones that sound better than you’d think they would for their relatively low price (the company says the Q stands for quality, C stands for creative and Y stands for youth). Its new-for-2024 H3 Pro headphones are similar to models in this price range from 1More, Tribit and Edifier, but they arguably sound a touch better and I found them relatively comfortable to wear, as they feature a lightweight design and memory foam ear pads.

1More SonoFlow: The design of 1More’s SonoFlow headphones reminds me a little of some earlier Sony headphones and also the newer Sennheiser Momentum Wireless 4. They’re a bit generic looking but sleek enough and more importantly, comfortable to wear. They also feature very respectable sound quality. It doesn’t quite measure up to the sound quality of what’ll get with more premium models like the Momentum Wireless 4, it isn’t that far off. The SonoFlow headphones deliver smooth sound with good clarity and relatively well-defined bass (they’re just not quite as rich or dynamic sounding as those premium models I mentioned). They also have support for the LDAC audio codec.

OneOdio A10: The OneOdio A10s deliver more than you’d expect for their relatively modest price. They’re not only built better than you think they would be for around $80 and are pretty comfortable to wear. They have a dual-hinge design and feel sturdy, weighing in at 395 grams. They sound surprisingly decent and have reasonably good noise canceling with a transparency mode (which has a slight audible hiss). No, they’re not as comfortable as Bose’s and Sony’s models (they do feel a tad heavy) and their sound lacks that extra bit of clarity, bass definition and depth that more premium headphones tend to deliver. They did exceed my expectations and come with a decent carrying case, even if the OneOdio logo splayed across it is a bit garish. 

JBL Tune 670NC: The JBL Tune 670NC is one of a relatively small number of on-ear headphones to offer active noise canceling. It’s something of a value model — no carrying case is included — but it does have memory foam ear pads that get you a comfortable fit for an on-ear headphone. Deliver clear sound with punch bass, it has 32mm drivers and improves on its predecessor’s battery life, offering up to a whopping 70 hours (or 44 hours with ANC on), and an extra three hours of battery with just five minutes of charge.

Budget noise-canceling headphone FAQs

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media