Connect with us

Technologies

Report Hints at Improved Siri This Fall After Inner Apple Turmoil

We may yet see Siri improvements this fall, but how far they go is still unknown.

According to a report by The New York Times, the first round of Siri improvements could arrive as soon as this fall to shore up the struggling digital assistant, which is supposed to be a linchpin of Apple Intelligence.

In an article about Apple challenges, which ranges from US tariffs on China to strife among the executives and teams responsible for advancing Siri, writer Tripp Mickle included this tidbit: «The company plans to release a virtual assistant in the fall capable of doing things like editing and sending a photo to a friend on request, three people with knowledge of its plans said.»

That description is still a far cry from the interconnected smart assistant teased at WWDC 24 and during the launch of the iPhone 16 series, where Siri would be able to pull context from texts and emails about family members arriving on incoming flights. In fact, it doesn’t seem to address that the current state of Siri appears to be regressing.

In a rare move by the secretive company, Apple acknowledged in a March statement to Daring Fireball from spokeswoman Jacqueline Roy, that its efforts to usher in a smarter Siri digital assistant as part of Apple Intelligence are «going to take us longer than we thought» and that the company «anticipate(s) rolling [these features] out in the coming year.» Now the Times report says we could see improvements as early as the fall.

Basic queries shouldn’t be difficult

Siri and Apple Intelligence have taken several knocks lately. Behind the scenes, Apple shook up its executive ranks and removed John Giannandrea from his role overseeing Siri, a transition detailed in the Times article as well as a more detailed behind-the-scenes look published by The Information (and summarized well at MacRumors).

But Siri also seems to lack context for basic queries. Apple did fix an earlier problem where if you asked Siri, «What month is it?» the answer was a curt, «Sorry, I don’t understand.» Still, when I ask that same question now, I don’t get the month; I get the current full date. And when I phrase the question as, «What is the current month?» I’m told, «It was Tuesday, April 1, 2025.» (If I wasn’t aware of Siri’s issues, I might wonder if the digital assistant was trying to play an April Fools’ joke on me.)

Parsing a basic question like that doesn’t seem to be a heavy request. Perhaps it never came up because it’s the kind of question only someone waking from a coma or being rescued from a deserted island would ask.

All of this is frustrating for shareholders, journalists (though we’ve grudgingly gotten accustomed to it) and customers, especially when they expect a level of assistant competency from Apple that just isn’t there. And the secrecy invites the same kind of months-long drumbeat of «Apple is falling behind on AI» that led up to the reveal of Apple Intelligence.

By taking the unusual (for Apple) step of responding to investor and media pressure — and announcing features that aren’t close to ready — the company may have made things worse by confirming that analysts, reporters and fans were right.

The smart play would be for Apple to adhere to its secretive ways, not previewing its features and capabilities until they’re much closer to being ready to ship. This week’s leak suggests the company might be getting the message.

Apple’s inflated expectations

Apple’s approach to product development has been to work on projects secretly, over years if needed, until they’re ready to see the light. They’re often not 100% baked at release, but when they’re ready to be introduced to the public, the core features and functions are there.

I could cite plenty of examples. It’s a valid argument that the Vision Pro is not a successful product — it’s expensive, it hasn’t been broadly adopted by customers or developers, it’s uncomfortable and so on — but the essential elements such as processing power, micro-OLED screens and VisionOS are all there as a solid foundation.

When a product’s existence is heavily leaked ahead of time, Apple typically unveils a finished version — even if it’s still limited in functionality. It was generally expected leading up to Macworld Expo in 2007 that Apple would announce a phone — particularly following the embarrassment of the Motorola ROKR E1 phone. But no one expected it to break from other smartphones of the time with its large screen, lack of physical keyboard and full web browser.

What’s different this time is that Apple’s promise for an advanced Siri, to anchor Apple Intelligence, seems to be in reaction to investors, the media and early-adopters obsessed with not just the presence of AI but also the immediacy of AI. Apple needs to be seen as an active player in the AI space with competitive features — and that those are just around the corner. 

Also around that corner? The yearly iPhone refresh. Apple, like other phone-makers, sees AI as an important driver of new phone sales, since only its iPhone 15 Pro and iPhone 16 series models have the processing power to run Apple Intelligence. And that’s how we got a WWDC keynote in 2024 focused on Apple Intelligence and promising that very soon Siri would become an intelligent agent that can pull data from every corner of your iPhone to respond to queries such as «What time does my mom’s flight arrive?»

LLMs don’t follow a traditional release model

Large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT are advancing at a record pace. They’re now much more naturally conversational and can summarize large amounts of information well. Real-time audio transcription, for example, is game-changing for someone like me who has always struggled to hand-write notes.

At the same time, these AI technologies are not making the kinds of gains that tech giants like Google and OpenAI expect. Apple isn’t the only company hanging its AI future on intelligent agents that know everything about us.

Perhaps Apple, like Google, saw the brain-bending pace of advancement in LLMs’ capabilities and figured the bumps and stumbles it’s facing now could be solved with a few quick bug fixes and AI model recompiles. With those smoothed over, connecting the pieces and presenting them as the next generation of Siri would take a few months.

But that’s not how it’s playing out. AI hallucinations and bad data are still a problem — are you getting your recommended dietary requirement of rocks?

I suspect Apple is smarting not just from having to delay its Siri plans, but from being forced to do so publicly. And yet, even if Future Siri doesn’t make an appearance in the near future, there are plenty of opportunities coming up to continue improving Apple Intelligence features. Work on iOS 19 and iPhone 17 models, plus preparations for WWDC 2025 are no doubt well under way. Now that there are fewer expectations for the stalwart assistant, perhaps Siri’s year will improve from here.

Technologies

Starlink Plans to Send 42K Satellites Into Space. That Could Be Bad News for the Ozone

Continue Reading

Technologies

Scary Survey Results: Teen Drivers Are Often Looking at Their Phones

New troubling research found that entertainment is the most common reason teens use their phones behind the wheel, followed by texting and navigation.

A new study reveals that teen drivers in the US are spending more than one-fifth of their driving time distracted by their phones, with many glances lasting long enough to significantly raise the risk of a crash. Published in the journal Traffic Injury Prevention and released on Thursday, the research found that, on average, teens reported looking at their phones during 21.1% of every driving trip. More than a quarter of those distractions lasted two seconds or longer, which is an amount of time widely recognized as dangerous at highway speeds.

Most distractions tied to entertainment, not emergencies

The top reason teens said they reached for their phones behind the wheel was for entertainment, cited by 65% of respondents. Texting (40%) and navigation (30%) were also common. Researchers emphasized that these distractions weren’t typically urgent, but rather habitual or social.

Teens know the risks

The study includes survey responses from 1,126 teen drivers across all four US regions, along with in-depth interviews with a smaller group of high schoolers. Most participants recognized that distracted driving is unsafe and believed their parents and peers disapproved of the behavior.

But many teens also assumed that their friends were doing it anyway, pointing to a disconnect between personal values and perceived social norms.

Teens think they can resist distractions

Interestingly, most teens expressed confidence in their ability to resist distractions. That belief, researchers suggest, could make it harder to change behavior unless future safety campaigns specifically target these attitudes.

The study’s lead author, Dr. Rebecca Robbins of Boston’s Brigham and Women’s Hospital, said interventions should aim to shift social norms while also emphasizing practical steps, such as enabling «Do Not Disturb» mode and physically separating drivers from their devices.

«Distracted driving is a serious public health threat and particularly concerning among young drivers,» Robbins said. «Driving distracted doesn’t just put the driver at risk of injury or death, it puts everyone else on the road in danger of an accident.» 

What this means for parents and educators

The researchers say their findings can help guide educators and parents in developing more persuasive messaging about the dangers of distracted driving. One of the recommendations is that adults need to counter teens’ beliefs that phone use while driving is productive or harmless.

While the study’s qualitative component was limited by a small and non-urban sample, the authors believe the 38-question survey they developed can be used more broadly to assess beliefs, behaviors and the effectiveness of future safety efforts.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Nintendo Switch 2 Joy-Con Issues? It Might Just Be Your HDMI Cable

Make sure to use the Switch 2 cable included with the new gaming console.

As the Switch 2 continues to sell in the millions for Nintendo, it shouldn’t be a surprise that there’d be some issues with the console. It appears, however, that one problem Switch 2 owners are facing is actually just a matter of using the wrong cable. 

Reddit users have posted about their Joy-Cons disconnecting when they’re playing on their Switch 2 while it’s docked, an issue spotted earlier by IGN. It does appear that, luckily, the issue can be resolved by using the included HDMI cable for the Switch 2 rather than an older, slower one — including the cable that came with the original Nintendo Switch. 

Nintendo laid out the solution on its support page for when the Joy-Con 2 starts disconnecting from the console: 

  • Confirm that you’re using an «Ultra High Speed» HDMI cable to connect the dock to the TV. If it’s not Ultra High Speed, your console won’t perform as expected when docked.
  • If you’re using a different cable than the one that came with the console, it should have printed on the cable that it’s «Ultra High Speed.»
  • The HDMI cable that came with the Nintendo Switch is not «Ultra High Speed» and should not be used with the Nintendo Switch 2 dock.

Nintendo didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment about the source of this issue. 

Since the Switch 2 launch, many gamers have come to realize that Nintendo’s new console is very picky about what cables are connected to it. This goes for the HDMI cable as well as the power cable. 

While the new and old Switch share the same name, they don’t share the same components. The Switch 2 is a huge upgrade in graphics power over the 2017 console, which means it needs the appropriate power supply. Not providing the Switch 2 with sufficient power could likely cause some issues, especially if the system has to do a lot of work to run a game. 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media