Connect with us

Technologies

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Review: It’s All About the Cover Screen

Samsung’s flip phone finally gets a bigger cover screen, making that $1,000 price easier to swallow.

A month ago, I was convinced that Motorola’s Razr Plus was the best flip phone money could buy. But after two weeks using the new Samsung’s Galaxy Z Flip 5, which also starts at $1,000 (£1,049, AU$1,649), I changed my mind. 

Samsung’s new flip phone, which goes on sale Friday, now has a bigger cover screen that nearly occupies the entire front of the device when closed. That might not sound like a big deal, but it goes a long way in making the Z Flip more useful without having to open it. 

Foldable phones have previously felt like an answer to a nonexistent problem. That still may be true, but having the option to send messages, snap photos and respond to notifications on a device that fits in the palm of my hand adds a degree of convenience that’s hard to understand unless you’ve tried it.

Motorola’s new Razr Plus raised the bar for what a flip phone should be in 2023, and it deserves credit for that. But there are a few factors that make the Z Flip 5 the superior choice for most shoppers interested in a flip phone. The design and build quality feel sturdier, the software is more polished and the phone gets an additional year of Android version support compared to what Motorola offers. 

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 closed with WhatsApp open on the cover screen

That doesn’t mean Samsung gets everything right. At $1,000, the Z Flip 5 still demands a high price for a phone that doesn’t have a telephoto camera. Like previous Z Flips, you’re paying for the convenience of having a device that can fit in your pocket more easily. While portability is still the driving factor behind the Z Flip’s appeal, the Flip 5 represents Samsung’s attempt at giving users another reason to consider giving foldables a chance. And it’s off to a great start. 

Galaxy Z Flip 5’s smaller screen gets a big upgrade

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 being held while closed

The Galaxy Z Flip 5’s larger new front screen, which Samsung calls the Flex Window, is hard to miss. It measures 3.4 inches, making it much bigger than the miniscule 1.9-inch screen on the front of the Galaxy Z Flip 4, but smaller than the Razr Plus. 3.6-inch cover display.

That more spacious front screen means there’s a lot more I was able to do with the Z Flip 5 closed. As I wrote in my first impressions story, the small screen’s interface is primarily designed to run widgets rather than full apps. Widgets provide the type of information you’d expect to see on a small screen, such as the weather, your calendar, alarms and pinned apps and contacts. 

From the main lock screen, I can swipe from right to left to cycle through various widgets, while swiping from left to right will show my notifications. There’s a small dot located on the left side of the screen to indicate whether you have any unchecked notifications, which feels very smartwatch-esque.

The weather widget being shown on the Galaxy Z Flip 5's cover screen.

The Z Flip 5 also has a clever pinching gesture for showing thumbnails of all my widgets on screen at once, which can be helpful for quickly jumping to a specific screen without swiping multiple times. It feels very Apple-like, and it’s a good example of how Samsung is thinking about navigation and user interface design differently on a display this small.

But Samsung only allows certain apps on the cover screen natively, whereas almost every app I’ve used on the Razr Plus was supported on its outer display without much extra fuss. On the Z Flip 5, I had to install the Good Lock app from the Galaxy Store to gain access to a broader selection of apps on the cover screen. 

Still, the Z Flip 5 natively supports many of the apps that make sense for the cover screen, such as Google Maps, the camera app, and messaging apps like WhatsApp. Even though Spotify doesn’t show up as a compatible app, I was able to access album art and playback controls from the Z Flip 5’s front screen when I played music with the phone open. 

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 Looks Chic With Its New Cover Display

See all photos

I spent most of my time using the Galaxy Z Flip 5 while vacationing in South Korea, and there were a few apps that would have been very useful on the front display while traveling around Seoul. Google Translate is a big one that comes to mind. Being able to quickly pull up the app from the cover screen could have made some of my interactions go a bit smoother. Quickly browsing through news headlines or social media feeds with the device closed while riding the Seoul Metro also would have been nice considering I was usually using one hand to grip the subway handles. 

The new Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 phone

It wasn’t until I returned from my trip that I used the Good Lock app to bring apps like Google, Google Translate and Slack to the cover screen. Even though these apps technically aren’t optimized for the cover screen, they ran surprisingly well. My only gripe is that they appear on a separate widget, meaning I have to swipe between two separate widgets on the cover screen to access my apps.  

It’s also worth mentioning that apps on the Z Flip 5’s main screen also don’t seamlessly transition to the cover screen when closing the phone as they do on the Razr Plus. Instead, it only works the other way around, with apps moving from the cover screen to the main screen after opening the device.

Regardless, Samsung’s execution of the Flex Window is a promising start. It’s clean and intuitive, and there’s a lot of potential for Samsung to expand its capabilities. 

Galaxy Z Flip 5 gets a new hinge

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 being held while closed

Samsung’s new foldable phone also has an upgraded hinge that allows the device to close completely with no gap when shut. This is another area where Samsung is playing catch-up; Motorola and Google both launched foldable phones in June that have no gap when closed. 

Samsung also says the new hinge should make the Z Flip 5 more durable since it has fewer moving parts, and the hinge’s structure should also improve shock absorption. There’s still a visible crease running across the phone’s 6.7-inch main display, but it feels a slightly flatter to the touch compared to the  Z Flip 4.

Motorola’s Razr Plus looks thinner than the Z Flip 5, but Samsung’s phone has a sturdier feel. I’ve only used the Razr Plus for a couple of weeks, but I already notice that it doesn’t always unfold completely straight. I haven’t used the Z Flip 5 for very long yet, so it’s impossible to know how it will hold up over time.  

That also raises a larger question about long-term durability for foldable phones. Although foldable phone designs have improved over the last four years, it’s worth remembering that these devices come with a higher risk of damage compared to traditional smartphones. They’re also not dust-resistant like standard, non-folding devices. Both the Z Flip 5 and Z Flip 4 have an IPX8 ingress protection rating, meaning they’re water-resistant but not dust-resistant. 

Galaxy Z Flip 5’s camera is slightly better than the Z Flip 4

The author holding the Z Flip 5 up to take a photo.

It’s clear that Samsung focused most of its resources on the Z Flip 5’s cover screen and hinge. The Galaxy Z Flip 5’s camera is largely the same as last year’s model, except it has a new coating that should reduce lens flare. That means the Z Flip 5 has 12-megapixel wide and ultrawide cameras, and a 10-megapixel selfie camera.

Instead of upgrading the camera sensor, Samsung is relying on the device’s new Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy chip to do the heavy lifting when it comes to improving image quality. It’s somewhat disappointing not to see an upgrade in camera hardware considering Samsung has been positioning the Z Flip as being ideal for snapping photos thanks to its flexibility. But photos taken on the Z Flip 5 are sharp and colorful enough to satisfy most people.  

And you can certainly tell the difference when comparing photos alongside those taken on the Z Flip 4. I observed that colors look bolder and details are crisper in photos taken with the Z Flip 5 versus the Z Flip 4.

When it comes to the Razr Plus and Galaxy Z Flip 5, results differ depending on the situation. There were times when the Razr’s photos felt drab and lacking in color compared to the Z Flip 5’s.

Take a look at the photos below to see how the Z Flip 5’s camera compares to the Razr’s and Z Flip 4’s below. The differences may be hard to spot, but they’re more prominent when viewing these photos at their full size on a laptop-sized screen. 

Galaxy Z Flip 5

A photo of vanilla ice cream and frozen melon taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 5.

Galaxy Z Flip 4

A photo of vanilla ice cream and frozen melon taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 4.

Motorola Razr Plus

A photo of vanilla ice cream and frozen melon taken on the Motorola Razr Plus

Galaxy Z Flip 5

A photo of the busy shopping district of Myeong-dong in Seoul taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 5.

Galaxy Z Flip 4

A photo of Seoul's bustling shopping district Myeong-dong taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 4.

Motorola Razr Plus

A photo of Seoul's bustling shopping district Myeong-dong taken on the Razr Plus.

Galaxy Z Flip 5

A photo of my husband taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 5

Galaxy Z Flip 4

A photo of my husband taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 4.

Motorola Razr Plus

A portrait of my husband taken with the Moto Razr Plus.

But there were also times when Motorola’s phone succeeded in certain areas over Samsung’s. In the photo below of a delicious boiling pan of tteokbokki, a Korean street food staple that usually consists of soft chewy rice cakes and other ingredients soaked in red pepper sauce, Samsung did a better job at capturing the bubbling sauce’s orange color more accurately. But Motorola’s photo is noticeably sharper.

Galaxy Z Flip 5

A photo of the Korean food staple tteokbokki taken on the Galaxy Z Flip 5

Motorola Razr Plus

A photo of simmering tteokbokki, a popular Korean dish, taken on the Motorola Razr Plus.

As was the case with previous generations of the Z Flip, you shouldn’t expect to get the same top-notch camera quality you’d find on a phone like the Galaxy S23 Ultra or Google Pixel 7 Pro. But I’m impressed with the improvements I’ve seen so far. While the Z Flip 5 doesn’t support the same zoom range or the offer option to capture super high-resolution photos like S23 Ultra, its cameras are plenty capable of documenting food and travel for Instagram. And that’s exactly what I did while testing it in Seoul.

Check out the gallery below to see the photos I took all over the city, from cultural landmarks like Gyeongbokgung Palace, incredible views from the base of Namsan Seoul Tower and nightlife hotspots like Hongdae. And of course, I’ve included photos of the delicious food I ate while in Seoul, too.

See the Galaxy Z Flip 5’s Camera in Action All Over Seoul

See all photos

On a phone like the Z Flip 5, it’s not just about image quality. The device’s foldable design also lets you capture photos in different ways. I can, for example, open the phone halfway and rest it on a surface to capture a photo hands-free.

The cover screen also allows you to capture selfies with the main rear cameras rather than the lower resolution internal selfie camera. The front screen can show previews of photos being captured with the main cameras before hitting the shutter button, allowing the subject to see a live preview. However, this requires pressing a specific button within Samsung’s camera app while shooting, whereas Motorola’s phone does this automatically. And I liked having a much larger viewfinder for capturing selfies on the Z Flip 5 compared to the Z Flip 4.

Galaxy Z Flip 5: Main 12MP camera

A selfie taken with the Z Flip 5's main rear camera.

Galaxy Z Flip 5: Inner 10MP camera

A selfie taken with the Z Flip 5's internal camera.

Galaxy Z Flip 5 software, performance and battery life

The new Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 phone

A foldable design doesn’t mean much without useful software features. Samsung’s answer to this is Flex Mode, which shifts apps to the top portion of the display when the device is positioned half open like a laptop.  

There isn’t much new with Flex Mode this year, but it’s still more functional than Motorola’s equivalent feature for the Razr Plus, which only worked in the camera app for me. 

Performance on the Galaxy Z Flip 5 is what’s expected from a phone at this price. Apps launch quickly, I didn’t notice any lag or stuttering, and supported apps seamlessly switch from the cover screen to the main display.

I also ran benchmark tests meant to evaluate general computing performance and graphics power. Geekbench 6, the general computing test, assesses how the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chip inside the Z Flip 5 performs at both the single-core and multicore level. 3DMark Wild Life Extreme tests graphics by simulating gaming environments. 

Take a look at the chart below to see how the Galaxy Z Flip 5 compares against last year’s Z Flip 4 and the Motorola Razr Plus in these tests.

Galaxy Z Flip 5 Performance Comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 1,999 5,116 3,512Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 1483 3976 2669Motorola Razr Plus 1,756 4,318 1,687
  • Geekbench 6 (Single Core)
  • Geekbench 6 (Multicore)
  • 3DMark Wild Life
Note: Higher score are better.

Battery life on the Z Flip 5 is long enough to make it through a busy day of wandering around Seoul snapping photos, looking up directions and discovering nearby points of interest. I typically took my phone off its charger in the late morning, between 9:30 and 10:30 a.m., and still had 25 to 30% of my battery left between midnight and 1:30 a.m.

During CNET’s 45-minute battery endurance test, which involves performing everyday tasks like streaming YouTube, making a video call, playing games and scrolling through social media, the Z Flip 5’s battery dropped from 100% to 90%. That’s better than last year’s Z Flip 4 and about on par with the Galaxy S23. The Galaxy Z Flip 5 also performed about the same as the Galaxy S23 in a three-hour battery test that involved continuously streaming YouTube with the brightness cranked to the max. The Z Flip 5 had 80% of its battery left after three hours of streaming, whereas the S23 had 81%. 

These improvements are largely thanks to the Z Flip 5’s new processor. It has the same battery capacity as last year’s Z Flip 4 but there’s more local storage at the base level. 

The $1,000 Galaxy Z Flip 5 comes with 256GB of storage, meaning you get double the space for same starting price as its predecessor.

Galaxy Z Flip 5 shows foldables are improving

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 being held while open

The Galaxy Z Flip 5 further proves that phone-makers are getting closer to answering the question of why foldable phones are useful in the first place. The new cover screen goes a long way in reaching that goal.

As I wrote when reviewing the Motorola Razr Plus, the bigger external display shows that flip phones are about more than just portability. Having a device that’s easy to navigate with one hand and can also unfold to a full-sized phone makes the Z Flip 5 and other similar phones more versatile than the phones most people carry today. Companies like Samsung and Motorola are starting to realize that the so-called «killer app» for foldables may come down to the benefits of having two screens that work together, rather than focusing primarily on how the main screen behaves when folded and unfolded.

Galaxy Z Flip 5 Specs Compared

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5 Motorola Razr Plus Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 4 5G
Display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate, brightness Cover: 3.4-inch AMOLED (728 x 720 pixels); internal: 6.7-inch AMOLED (2,640 x 1,080 pixels), 1-120Hz Cover: 3.6-inch OLED (1,066 x 1,056 pixels); internal: 6.9-inch (2,640 pixels x 1,080) Cover: 1.9-inch AMOLED (512 x 260 pixels); internal: 6.7-inch (2,640 x 1,080 pixels)
Pixel density Cover: 306 ppi, Internal: 425 ppi Cover: 413 ppi, internal: 413ppi Cover: 302 ppi, internal: 425 ppi
Dimensions (inches) Open: 6.5 x 2.83 x 0.27 in; closed: 3.35 x 2.83 x 0.59 in Open: 2.91 x 6.73 x 0.28 in; closed: 2.91 x 3.48 x 0.59 in Open: 2.83 x 3.3 x 0.67 in; closed: 2.83 x 6.5 x 0.27 in; hinge: 0.59 in (sagging)
Dimensions (millimeters) Open: 71.88 x 165.1 x 6.89 mm; closed: 71.88 x 85.09 x 14.99 mm Open: 73.95 x 170.83 x 6.99 mm; closed: 73.95 x 88.42 x 15.1 mm Open: 71.9 x 165.2 x 6.9 mm; closed: 71.9 x 84.9 x 17.1 mm; hinge: 15.9 mm (sagging);
Weight (grams, ounces) 187 g (6.6 oz) 189 g (6.64 oz) 187 g (6.59 oz)
Mobile software (at launch) Android 13 Android 13 Android 12
Camera 12-megapixel (main), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) 12-megapixel (main), 13-megapixel (ultrawide) 12-megapixel (main), 12-megapixel (ultrawide)
Front-facing camera 10-megapixel 32-megapixel 10-megapixel
Video capture 4K 4K 4K
Processor Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
RAM/storage 8GB + 256GB/512GB 8GB + 256GB 8GB+ 128GB/256GB/512GB
Expandable storage None None None
Battery 3,700 mAh (dual-battery) 3,800 mAh 3,700 mAh
Fingerprint sensor Side Side Side
Connector USB-C USB-C USB-C
Headphone jack None None None
Special features 5G-enabled, IPX8 water resistance, 25W wired charging, wireless charging, wireless power share, dual SIM IP52, 5G-enabled, foldable display, 30W wired charging, wireless charging IPX8, 5G enabled, foldable display, wireless charging, 25W fast charging
US price off-contract $1,000 $1,000 $1,000
UK price £1,049 Converts to £780 £1,000
Australia price AU$1,649 Converts to AU$1,475 AU$1,499

Technologies

Apple CarPlay Ultra vs. Google Built-In: How the Next-Gen Auto Software Rivals Compare

Apple and Google are supercharging their car software experiences. Here’s how they differ.

I’d spent an hour driving a $250,000-plus Aston Martin up the Los Angeles coast when my hunger pangs became impossible to ignore, and as I’ve done many times before, I asked Siri (through Apple CarPlay) to find me a taco place. But then I did something no other car on the planet allows: I asked Siri to blast the AC and make the air colder. That’s because the 2025 Aston Martin DBX I drove was the first vehicle to come with Apple CarPlay Ultra, the upgraded version of the company’s car software.

Apple debuted CarPlay Ultra at WWDC 2025 last month, and this year’s version of the Aston Martin DBX is the first vehicle to launch with it (pairing with an iPhone running iOS 18.5 or later). As I drove the luxury crossover around, I fiddled with other features that aren’t available in regular CarPlay, from climate control to radio to checking the pressure on the car’s tires. Ultimately, Ultra gives deeper access to more car systems, which is a good thing.

That reminded me a lot of a new feature announced at Google I/O back in May: Google Built-In, which similarly lets users control more of a car’s systems straight from the software interface (in that case, Android Auto). When I got a demonstration of Google Built-In, sitting in a new Volvo EX90 electric SUV, I saw what this new integration of Google software offered: climate controls, Gemini AI assistance and even warnings about car maintenance issues.

But the name is telling: Google Built-In requires automakers to incorporate Android deeper into their cars’ inner workings. Comparatively, Apple CarPlay Ultra support seems like it won’t require car manufacturers to do nearly as much work to prepare their vehicles, just adding a reasonably advanced multicore processor onboard that can handle an increased task load. (Aston Martin will be able to add CarPlay Ultra support to its 2023 and 2024 lineups through firmware updates because they already contain sufficiently advanced CPUs.)

Both solutions reflect Apple’s and Google’s different approaches to their next versions of car software. Apple’s is lighter weight, seemingly requiring less commitment from the automaker to integrate CarPlay Ultra into their vehicles (so long as it has adequate processing power onboard), which will run through a paired iPhone. Google Built-In does require much more integration, but it’s so self-sufficient that you can leave your Android phone at home and still get much of its functionality (aside from getting and sending messages and calls). 

Driving with Apple CarPlay Ultra: Controlling climate, radio and more

As I drove around Los Angeles in the Aston Martin with Apple CarPlay Ultra, I could tell what new features I would be missing once I stepped back into my far more humble daily driver. 

At long last, I could summon Siri and ask it to play a specific song (or just a band) and have it pulled up on Spotify. Since Apple’s assistant now has access to climate controls, I asked to turn up the AC, and it went full blast. I asked to find tacos and it suggested several fast food restaurants — well, it’s not perfect, but at least it’s listening. 

To my relief, Aston Martin retained the physical knobs by the gearshift to control fan speed, temperature, stereo volume and the car’s myriad roadway options (like driving assistance) in case the driver likes traditional controls, but almost all of them could also be altered in the interface. Now, things like radio controls (AM/FM and satellite) and car settings are nestled in their own recognizable apps in CarPlay’s interface.

Ultimately, that’ll be one of CarPlay Ultra’s greatest advantages: If you enter an unfamiliar vehicle (like a rental), you still know exactly where everything is. No wrestling with a carmaker’s proprietary software or trying to figure out where some setting or other is located. It’s not a complete replacement — in the Aston Martin’s case, there were still a handful of settings (like for ambient light projected when the doors open) that the luxury automaker controlled, but they were weaved into CarPlay so you could pop open those windows and go back to Apple’s interface without visibly changing apps.

The dependable ubiquity of Apple’s CarPlay software will likely become even more essential as cars swap out their analog instrument clusters for screens, as Aston Martin did. There’s still a touch of the high-end automaker’s signature style as the default screen behind the wheel shows two traditional dials (one for the speedometer, one for RPMs) with Aston Martin’s livery. But that can be swapped out for other styles, from other dials with customizable colors to a full-screen Maps option.

Each of the half-dozen or so dashboard options was swapped out via square touchpads smaller than a dime on the wheel next to the other touch controls. On the dual-dial display types, I swiped vertically to rotate between a central square (with Maps directions, current music or other app information) or swiped horizontally to switch to another dashboard option. No matter which one you choose, the bottom bar contains all the warning lights drivers will recognize from analog cars — even with digital displays, you’re not safe from the check engine light (which is a good thing). 

Apple CarPlay Ultra doesn’t yet do everything I want. I wish I could also ask Siri to roll down the windows (as Google Built-In can — more on that later) and lock or unlock specific doors. If Apple is connected to the car enough to be able to read the pressure in each tire, I wish it could link up with the engine readout and be able to tell me in plain language what kind of maintenance issue has sprung up. Heck, I wish it could connect to the car remotely and blast the AC before I get in (or fire up the seat warmer), as some proprietary car apps can do. And while Apple Maps and Waze will be included at launch, Google Maps support is not, but it’s coming later.

These aren’t huge deficiencies, and they do show where CarPlay Ultra could better meet driver needs in future updates, notwithstanding the potentially dicey security concerns for using CarPlay Ultra for remote climate or unlocking capabilities. But it shows where the limits are today compared to Google’s more in-depth approach.

Google Built-In: Deeper car integrations — and, of course, Gemini AI

The day after Google I/O’s keynote was quieter back in May, as attendees flitted between focused sessions and demos of upcoming software. It was the ideal time to check out Google Built-In, which was appropriately shown off in a higher-end Volvo EX90 electric SUV (though not nearly as pricey as an Aston Martin). 

As mentioned above, Google Built-In has deeper integrations with vehicles than what I saw in Apple CarPlay Ultra, allowing users to change the climate through its interface or access other systems, including through voice requests. For instance, it can go beyond AC control to switch on the defroster, and even raise and lower specific windows relative to the speaker’s position: cameras within the car (in the rearview mirror, if I remember right) meant that when my demonstrator asked to «roll down this window» pointing over his left shoulder, the correct window rolled down.

Google Built-In is also connected to Gemini, Google’s AI assistant, for what the company is calling «Google Live,» a separate and more capable version of the Android Auto assistant experience in cars right now. With a Live session, I could request music or directions much like I could with Siri — but my demo went further, as the demonstrator tasked Gemini with requests better suited for generative AI, such as asking, «Give me suggestions for a family outing» and telling it to send a specific text to a contact. 

The demonstrator then asked Gemini for recipe advice — «I have chicken, rice and broccoli in the fridge, what can I make?» — as an example of a query someone might ask on the drive home.

Since you’re signed into your Google account, Gemini can consult anything connected to it, like emails and messages. It’s also trained on the user manuals from each car-maker, so if a warning light comes on, the driver can ask the voice assistant what it means — no more flipping through a dense manual trying to figure out what each alert means.

There are other benefits to Google Built-In, like not needing your phone for some features. But there are also drawbacks, like the need to keep car software updated, requiring more work on Google’s end to make sure cars are protected from issues or exploits. They can’t just fix it in the most current version of Android — they’ll need to backport that fix to older versions that vehicles might still be on. 

This deeper integration with Google Built-In has a lot of the benefits of Apple CarPlay Ultra (a familiar interface, easier to access features), just cranked up to a greater degree. It surely benefits fans of hands-off controls, and interweaving Gemini naturally dovetails with Google’s investments, so it’s easy to see that functionality improving. But a greater reliance on Android within the car’s systems could be concerning as the vehicle ages: Will the software stop being supported? Will it slow down or be exposed to security exploits? A lot of questions remain regarding making cars open to phone software interfaces.

Continue Reading

Technologies

A Samsung Tri-Fold Phone Could Be in Your Future, if This Leak Is to Be Believed

UI animations might have revealed the imminent release of a so-called «Galaxy G Fold» device with three screens.

Samsung has been showing off mobile display concepts with three screens at trade events such as CES for several years, but it might finally bring one to market soon if a leaked UI animation is any indicator.

As reported by Android Authority, an animated image from a software build of One UI 8 appears to show what some are dubbing a «Galaxy G Fold» device with three display panels. The screens would be capable of displaying different information or working in unison as one large display. The new phone model could debut as early as next week at Samsung’s Unpacked event on July 9 in Brooklyn. 

Huawei released a tri-folding phone in February, the Mate XT Ultimate Design. 

Some websites have gone into overdrive trying to uncover details on what Samsung’s new device might include and how much it may cost, with Phone Arena reporting that according to a Korean media report, it could be priced at about $3,000. 

Samsung didn’t immediately respond to request for comment.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Early Prime Day Headphone Deals: Up to $100 Off Top-Rated Pairs From Apple, Beats and More

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media