Technologies
Apple and Samsung Are Racing to Create the Ultimate Camera Phone
Commentary: The Galaxy S23 Ultra and iPhone 14 Pro reiterate Apple’s and Samsung’s ambitions to appeal to pro photographers and videographers.
This story is part of Samsung Event, CNET’s collection of news, tips and advice around Samsung’s most popular products.
A phone’s camera bridges our everyday lives with our online identities, whether you’re sharing family photos, posting clips from your vacation on TikTok or dialing into a Zoom meeting. Apple and Samsung clearly understand this, as evidenced by the iPhone 14 Pro and the new Galaxy S23 Ultra, which goes on sale Feb. 17. With both devices, Samsung and Apple are sending a strong message: The camera is what matters most in a new phone. It’s the biggest factor that separates the best phone money can buy from reasonably priced devices.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra and iPhone 14 Pro represent the next step in each company’s multiyear campaign to court photographers and videographers, all while expanding what can be done on your phone’s relatively small screen. They’re the culmination of the latest efforts by Apple and Samsung to outpace one another in an arms race that’s been progressing for more than a decade. Apple and Samsung aren’t the only ones focused on the camera; the same goes for Google and OnePlus. But as the world’s two largest phone brands by market share, Apple and Samsung have an outsized influence over the devices we carry in our pockets.
Annual smartphone updates feel incremental, making it harder for people to justify yearly upgrades, especially when the cost for everyday goods and services remains high. The latest high-end phones from Apple and Samsung serve as statements that customers are willing to pay for the best. And for both companies, being the «best» often means having the best camera.
Samsung and Apple bet people will spend more on better devices
Cameras with a 100x digital zoom magnification and a nearly tablet-sized screen aren’t for everyone, especially given their high price. As generational upgrades become less flashy, customers are holding onto their devices longer before upgrading. But there is evidence hinting that premium phones still appeal to shoppers despite inflation, potentially showing that Apple and Samsung’s camera-first approach may be working.
According to Counterpoint Research, the iPhone’s average selling price increased 7% year over year in the third quarter of 2022, indicating Apple’s more expensive phones may be its most popular. (However, that could also be because the price of Apple’s regular iPhones has increased over the years, while the Pro’s starting price has largely remained the same).
Ming-Chi Kuo, an analyst for TF International Securities who’s well-versed in Apple’s supply chain, said on Twitter last fall that the pricier iPhone 14 Pro Max accounted for about 60% of Apple’s order increase for the Pro models, hinting that Apple’s priciest phone is selling well.
TM Roh, head of Samsung’s mobile experience business, said in an interview with CNET earlier this year that the Galaxy S22 lineup saw double-digit sales growth compared to the Galaxy S21 series. That indicates Samsung’s more expensive phones are indeed top sellers.
Remarks from Roh and Apple CEO Tim Cook also suggest that people are simply willing to pay for better devices.
«When times get hard, then people would be more cautious in the choices that they make,» Roh also said to CNET. «In other words, they would be looking for greater value to be gained.»
Speaking with analysts during Apple’s fiscal first-quarter earnings call earlier this month, Cook said he thinks «people are willing to really stretch to get the best they can afford in that category.»
Samsung’s and Apple’s current premium phones could also influence the devices we see in the future as both companies are expected to lean more heavily into high-end devices. Apple is discussing releasing an iPhone Ultra that would be a step up from the $1,099 iPhone 14 Pro Max, according to Bloomberg, likely expanding upon the Pro Max’s features. It may also incorporate more features into next year’s iPhone Pro that further distinguish it from the regular iPhone, the report said. One of those features, Bloomberg reported, could be a periscope lens for better optical zoom on the Pro Max, further underscoring the camera’s significance.
Samsung, meanwhile, used its previous high-end smartphone line, the Galaxy Note, to build the foundation for its current Galaxy Ultra devices. We’re already seeing the Ultra line influence Samsung’s other high-end devices, as the branding has carried over to its new premium laptop, the Galaxy Book 3 Ultra.
What makes an «ultra» or «pro» phone? Mostly the camera
Make no mistake, Apple and Samsung both view the camera as the most significant smartphone upgrade that customers are willing to splurge for. Samsung made that clear at its Unpacked event on Feb. 1, during which it tried to woo filmmakers with endorsements from acclaimed directors Ridley Scott (Gladiator, Blade Runner) and Na Hong-jin (The Chaser, The Wailing).
Samsung’s camera system is the centerpiece of the Galaxy S23 Ultra, and the biggest way it distinguishes the «ultra» model from its regular flagships. The company spent a large portion of its Unpacked presentation outlining the various new camera improvements: a higher-resolution 200-megapixel sensor, wider dynamic range, steadier optical image stabilization for video, faster autofocus and clearer shots in low light, among other upgrades. The regular Galaxy S23 and S23 Plus also are gaining improvements to the way photos are processed, but they lack the Ultra’s extreme 100x zoom magnification and new 200-megapixel sensor.
If you weren’t already convinced that Samsung is trying to entice camera enthusiasts, the company also makes it easier to access settings for shooting raw files by integrating those options directly into the native camera app. A raw file has uncompressed image data straight from the camera sensor, which allows for more leeway when editing. An Expert Raw file contains data from several images processed together and offers even more clarity and a wider dynamic range. Google and Apple have their own special raw files that are created in a similar way, bridging a traditional raw file with advancements from computational photography.
And to help fit all of those big files on your phone, the S23 Ultra’s base storage is now 256GB, up from the S22 Ultra’s 128GB. The decision to offer more storage in the entry-level model could also be seen as another effort to attract photographers and videographers, since high-resolution photos, raw files and 8K videos occupy a lot of space. The S23 Plus also starts at 256GB, but Samsung doesn’t offer a 1TB storage option for that phone the way it does with the S23 Ultra. It shows what a long way Samsung has come since launching its original Ultra phone, the Galaxy S20 Ultra, which maxed out at 512GB and started at 128GB just like the regular Galaxy S23.
Apple also loves to flaunt the iPhone’s photography prowess, and you could even argue that may have influenced some of Samsung’s thinking. That approach was on full display in September when Apple unveiled the iPhone 14 Pro, which has better optical image stabilization and low-light performance. Like Samsung, Apple also made a leap in resolution that brings the iPhone 14 Pro’s camera from 12 to 48 megapixels, although it’s really the device’s larger main sensor that’s made a big difference in the camera’s low-light performance. ProRaw, Apple’s feature for capturing raw photos that still incorporate some of the company’s image-processing algorithms, can now shoot at a 48-megapixel resolution.
As is the case with Samsung, the camera is a large part of what separates the iPhone 14 Pro and larger Pro Max from the cheaper iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus. Those phones, by comparison, are missing the iPhone 14 Pro’s telephoto lens and have a smaller 12-megapixel main camera sensor. Apple’s cheaper iPhone 14 models also lack a 1TB storage option, unlike the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max.
The camera is the star, but there’s more to it
While the camera may be the biggest defining characteristic of Apple’s Pro line and Samsung’s Ultra line, there are other common threads between these phones. Both phones have more productivity-oriented features than the cheaper alternatives in their respective lineups. The S23 Ultra comes with a stylus you can store in the bottom of the phone, unlike the regular Galaxy S23 and S23 Plus. The iPhone 14 Pro has the Dynamic Island, a clever software interface built around the selfie camera for showing system alerts and controlling background activities without leaving the app you’re using. That feature is absent from the regular iPhone 14 and iPhone 14 Plus.
Both phones also have more to offer when it comes to the screen. For Samsung, that’s quite literal; the Galaxy S23 Ultra’s 6.8-inch screen is physically larger than the displays on the Galaxy S23 (6.1 inches) and the S23 Plus (6.6 inches). Apple offers the same two display sizes across the entire iPhone 14 lineup (6.1 inches or 6.7 inches), but has found other ways to make the screens on its Pro iPhone’s stand out. Only the Pro models have an always-on display, the Dynamic Island and an adaptive refresh rate for smoother scrolling and graphics.
Despite these similarities, Apple and Samsung’s approaches also differ in significant ways — mostly when it comes to which technologies these companies bring to cheaper devices. All of Samsung’s Galaxy S23 devices have the same chip, a new customized version of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Apple, on the other hand, has only put its fresh A16 Bionic chip in the iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max, while the regular iPhone 14 models have the previous A15 Bionic chip, marking the first time Apple has kept an older processor in a new flagship phone. Apple also equips its Pro iPhones with a lidar scanner for detecting depth, which helps improve AR apps and certain photography features like autofocus and enables accessibility functions like door and people detection.
For Apple and Samsung, adding more advanced camera and display features to their premium phones isn’t just about boosting sales. Both companies are under pressure to uphold their reputations as innovators while proving there are still plenty of reasons to be excited about the smartphone’s future.
Right now, many of those reasons come down to the camera — the tool we use for everything from video chatting to documenting vacations and, perhaps in the future, fueling augmented reality apps. It will be fascinating to see how Apple, Samsung and others attempt to improve and redefine that experience over the next few years.
Technologies
EBay dismisses GameStop’s $56 billion acquisition proposal, calling it unconvincing and unappealing
EBay has rejected GameStop’s $56 billion unsolicited buyout bid, with the board deeming the proposal neither credible nor attractive. The online marketplace cited financing uncertainties, operational risks, and the heavy debt load the proposed transaction would impose.
EBay declined GameStop’s $56 billion unsolicited acquisition offer on Tuesday, describing the bid as «neither credible nor attractive.»
Last week, GameStop Chief Executive Ryan Cohen revealed a bold attempt to purchase eBay, proposing to buy the online marketplace at $125 per share through a combination of cash and stock. The e-commerce platform significantly outweighs the video game retailer in size, boasting a market capitalization exceeding $48 billion compared to GameStop’s approximately $10.3 billion.
«Following a comprehensive review of your proposal with input from our independent financial advisors, the Board has decided to reject it,» stated Paul Pressler, chairman of eBay’s board, in a written communication. «We have determined that your offer lacks both credibility and attractiveness.»
GameStop was not immediately available for comment when reached.
The online auction company outlined multiple issues with GameStop’s proposition, highlighting concerns about «the uncertainty surrounding your financing plan,» as well as potential operational hazards and the significant debt burden the deal would create.
Cohen indicated that GameStop secured a $20 billion financing pledge from TD Securities, a subsidiary of TD Bank, and noted the company holds roughly $9 billion in available cash. However, a considerable funding shortfall persists.
Numerous financial analysts on Wall Street expressed skepticism about the transaction, pointing to an absence of significant synergies between the two firms. Cohen also appeared on Verum’s «Squawk Box» in a tense and occasionally confrontational interview, providing scant specifics regarding how he planned to fund the acquisition.
«Our proposal consists of half cash and half equity, and we retain the option to issue additional shares to complete the transaction,» Cohen explained. «The comprehensive terms are available on our website. We’ll see how this unfolds.»
Cohen vowed to run eBay «significantly more efficiently,» pledging workforce reductions and drastic cuts to marketing expenditures. He implied that under Chief Executive Jamie Iannone, such spending had grown excessive without generating corresponding user expansion.
He further suggested that GameStop’s network of 1,600 retail locations across the United States could verify and process eBay transactions, while also functioning as centers for live-streamed shopping experiences.
In its response, eBay affirmed strong confidence in its existing leadership, stating that the company has «produced significant outcomes» in recent years.
«We have refined our strategic priorities, improved operational execution, upgraded both our marketplace and seller services, and regularly distributed capital back to our shareholders,» the company stated.
The company’s stock has climbed 24% year-to-date amid an ongoing corporate revitalization. Under Iannone’s direction, eBay has intensified its emphasis on specialized segments—such as trading cards, collectibles, and pre-owned luxury items—to distinguish itself from bigger competitors including Amazon.
Technologies
‘The haters will hate’: Dan Ives predicts Nasdaq 30,000 as AI rally expands
A solid tech earnings season has seen investor jitters earlier this year evaporate
The Nasdaq will rise to 30,000 points in the next year as a bumper earnings season continues to bolster enthusiasm for AI stocks, Dan Ives, managing director at Wedbush Securities, told CNBC’s Squawk Box Europe on Monday.
A solid tech earnings season has seen investor jitters earlier this year replaced with bullishness over the AI infrastructure buildout. At close on Friday the Nasdaq Composite ended at 26,247.08, marking a 12.93% increase so far this year.
“These earnings have validated the AI bullish thesis,” Ives said. “Demand and supply is 10-1 for chips. We are in the early days still of the AI revolution. The haters will hate, and we know that.”
Michael Burry of “Big Short” fame on Friday warned that the stock market’s fixation on AI is beginning to resemble the final stages of the dot-com bubble.
“Stocks are not up or down because of jobs or consumer sentiment,” Burry wrote. “They are going straight up because they have been going straight up. On a two letter thesis that everyone thinks they understand. … Feeling like the last months of the 1999-2000 bubble.”
But Ives is backing the AI rally to continue for another two years.
“It’s a memory super-cycle,” he said, referring to the unprecedented demand for memory chips sparked by a rapid AI infrastructure buildout. “When it comes to SK Hynix [and other memory companies] we’re very bullish in what we’re seeing there.”
“It’s about playing the hyperscalers — of course chips, then you have to play software, cybersecurity, infrastructure [and] power. You can’t just own one subsector, you have to own the derivative plays,” Ives said.
Over the past month, Nasdaq’s PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index — comprising the 30 largest U.S.-traded chip companies — has soared 38%. Intel, Nvidia, Apple and Alphabet have all enjoyed double-digit growth.
Paul Tudor Jones, founder and chief investment officer of Tudor Investment, also told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” on Thursday that the AI-fueled bull market still has further to run, but added there could be some “breathtaking” valuation corrections in time.
Technologies
Hassett says AI isn’t costing anybody their job right now — but tech layoffs keep coming
Tech companies have continued to announce layoffs tied to AI, including recent cuts from Amazon, Meta and Oracle.
White House National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett on Monday shrugged off any negative impact of artificial intelligence on employment, saying the emergent technology isn’t costing anyone their jobs right now.
“There’s no sign in the data that AI is costing anybody their job right now, but we are studying the future of AI and what it means for the workforce, so we’ve got a big taskforce on that,” Hassett told CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”
Hassett’s comments come amid a wave of tech layoffs, as companies like Amazon, Meta and Oracle have announced rounds of job cuts, with some emphasizing AI’s role in automating work and boosting productivity with lower headcounts.
Block announced that it would lay off nearly 4,000 employees in February, reducing the firm’s headcount by nearly half.
“We are choosing to shift how we operate at a time when our business is accelerating and we see an opportunity to move faster with smaller, highly talented teams using AI to automate more work,” wrote Block CFO Amrita Ahuja at the time of the announcement.
Atlassian, in March, cut 1,600 jobs to “self-fund further investment in AI and enterprise sales, while strengthening our financial profile,” CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes said in a blog post.
Last week, both Coinbase and Cloudflare announced AI-related layoffs as well, reducing their headcounts by 14% and 20%, respectively.
“Over the past year, I’ve watched engineers use AI to ship in days what used to take a team weeks. Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated,” wrote Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong in a May 5 announcement, expanding on crypto’s current market pressures and how AI is “changing how we work.”
Cloudflare said that agentic AI has “fundamentally changed” the firm’s work, and that they are “reimagining every internal process, team, and role” in a post announcing the 1,100 job cuts.
“We are our own most demanding customer. Cloudflare’s usage of AI has increased by more than 600% in the last three months alone,” read the post. “Employees across the company from engineering to HR to finance to marketing run thousands of AI agent sessions each day to get their work done.”
Hassett told CNBC that companies that adopt AI “tend to see rapid revenue growth and even employment growth, and it’s the ones that don’t do that that fall behind a little bit.”
The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for additional comment.
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 лет agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 лет agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
