Technologies
Best Mac VPN for 2023
If you’re a MacOS user, your virtual private network needs to be as smart as your machine. Here are the ones we recommend based on our latest tests.
Apple is known for its strong security measures, but if you’re a Mac user and you want to protect your online privacy, using a VPN, or virtual private network, is a good idea. While Apple devices offer a number of security features, it’s still possible for your internet service provider to track your browsing activity on both iOS and MacOS, and other sites can collect your IP address. MacOS can’t prevent either of those things, but the best Mac VPN can. With a reliable and well-tested VPN, Mac users can keep their online activity under wraps and better protect their digital information.
When we select the best Mac VPN for our readers, we consider a number of things that are specific to being a Mac user: First, if you’ve been using MacOS, you’re used to a clean, intuitive user interface with a minimal learning curve and a well-organized set of digital tools — which is why a VPN’s usability weighs into our consideration. Further, while not every Apple device is faster than a Windows and PC product, we want to see a VPN service with a connection speed that complements MacOS machines’ rapid reputation.
We also know that for many Mac users, a broad resistance to app-borne viruses and malware is a major reason for picking that ecosystem over Windows devices. To that end, we examine a VPN’s antitracker capacity and its general compatibility with Apple’s progressively heightened privacy policies.
Note that there are currently some limits to the privacy VPNs offer MacOS and iOS users. Recent independent research has suggested that iOS (and some MacOS) users’ browsing and internet data may be sent to Apple despite the protections offered by an encrypted VPN tunnel. We’ll continue to update our recommendations as more research emerges around this issue.
Drawn from our directory of the best VPN services, these are our top recommendations for the best Mac VPN. Keep checking back here often since we regularly update this list as new VPN contenders emerge for the top spot.
Despite battling major upheavals through the end of 2021, ExpressVPN clenched our Editor’s Choice Award for best VPN in 2022. One of the two largest providers globally, the VPN titan has been in business since 2009 and once again aggressively raised the industry bar for service transparency this year.
In the past year, ExpressVPN increased its independent third-party audit count, published details about its TrustedServer deployment process, joined the i2Coalition to call for improved VPN industry ethics, and released an open source Lightway encryption protocol.
After a set-back in 2020, ExpressVPN is again currently in first place as the fastest VPN we’ve tested. While most VPNs will cause you to lose half or more of your normal internet speeds, ExpressVPN caused us to lose just 2% of speeds in our 2022 speed tests. It also unblocks Netflix and other streaming services more reliably than most other VPNs, and seamlessly surpasses geo-blocking for access to international gaming servers and torrenting sites.
All of our top-rated VPNs have wide compatibility across platforms and operating systems, but ExpressVPN’s collection of setup guides, detailed FAQs and troubleshooting articles give it a clear advantage for users. So does its 24/7 customer support, and its no-questions-asked, 30-day money back guarantee.
While you can get a better month-to-dollar bargain with ExpressVPN’s two-year subscription, we don’t recommend anyone purchase any two-year VPN subscriptions at this time due to overall market volatility. ExpressVPN’s best plan offers five simultaneous connections for $100 a year (which includes three extra months, for a limited-time deal totalling 15 months of service). You can also opt for a $13 per-month plan, or pay $60 for six months.
Surfshark boasts an impressive suite of privacy and security features, unlimited simultaneous connections, easy-to-use interface and expansive global network. And it’s still significantly cheaper than most of its competitors. That’s what has helped Surfshark earn CNET’s Editors’ Choice for Best Value VPN in 2022.
Along with standard VPN features like a kill switch and DNS leak protection, some of the more notable Surfshark features include camouflage mode (which hides the fact you’re using a VPN), split-tunneling, NoBorders mode (which lets you use Surfshark in regions where VPNs are restricted) and multihop VPN connections. You’ll also get access to Surfshark’s CleanWeb technology, which blocks ads and malware and helps you avoid phishing attacks.
One innovation we’re excited to see Surfshark roll out over the next year is its Nexus network, which connects the VPN’s entire network of servers together and allows you to choose multiple servers to route your connection through. The functionality is somewhat similar to Tor, but Surfshark says it’s faster. With its Dynamic MultiHop, IP Randomizer and IP Rotator functions, the Nexus network can give you a few extra layers of protection while you use the VPN — which can be particularly beneficial to users with critical privacy needs.
Surfshark says it doesn’t log any user activity. And although no-logging claims are virtually impossible to prove with 100% certainty, German cybersecurity firm Cure53 declared Surfshark’s security to be «solid» in its 2021 security audit of the VPN. Surfshark says a new audit is forthcoming by the end of this year.
As of February 2022, both Surfshark and NordVPN have the same corporate parent (Tesonet), but Surfshark said it is legally bound not to share any information between the entities that would go against its Privacy Policy or Terms of Service. We didn’t find any language in either document that would indicate Surfshark has any obligation to share user data with its parent company or any sibling companies, including NordVPN.
Surfshark rates consistently as one of the fastest VPNs available. Which is why we were surprised that one of the only issues we had with Surfshark came in our speed test. While it still ranks as one of the fastest VPNs we’ve tested — with an internet speed loss of just 19% — we were disappointed with the inconsistent speed results we got to certain locations. Speeds to Europe and Singapore were erratic (dipping as low as 9 Mbps to Singapore), while speeds to New York were slower than speeds to the UK and even Australia. Surfhark is in the process of significantly expanding its server network, now offering more than 3,200 servers in 99 countries. The continued expansion of its server network could potentially help bring some more consistency to the VPN’s speeds.
In our tests, Surfshark had no problems unblocking Netflix and Amazon Prime Video content, but we did run into a fair bit of trouble accessing Disney Plus. After testing various servers in the US and other countries where Disney Plus is available, we were finally able to access the content when we connected to a server in Boston. You may need to test a few servers yourself before gaining access to Disney Plus content with Surfshark.
Surfshark offers cheaper introductory prices that jump after the first billing cycle. Even so, Surfshark manages to keep its prices lower than most other VPNs — helping it earn CNET’s Editors’ Choice for Best Value. The yearly plan starts out at $48 for the first year, then jumps to $60 for any additional years of service. If you opt for the two-year plan, you’ll pay $60 up front for the initial two years combined, then $60 per year for any additional years. Surfshark’s monthly plan stays constant at $13 a month. If you’re not satisfied with the service for any reason, Surfshark offers a 30-day money-back guarantee. Surfshark review.
NordVPN is one of the most recognized brands in the VPN field. It offers a generous simultaneous connection count, with six simultaneous connections through its network, where nearly all other providers offer five or fewer. NordVPN also offers a dedicated IP option for those looking for a different level of VPN connection, and the ability to VPN into Tor. More than half of Nord’s 5,000-plus server fleet is optimized for peer-to-peer sharing, though Nord has blocked torrenting in 14 countries.
In our latest test rounds we noticed a few hiccups in Nord’s killswitch when using its iOS app, which could be a concern for torrenters. However, Nord has a sideloaded iOS available on its website that it recommends to users. In our most recent speed tests, NordVPN’s performance recovered from middling speed scores of 2021 and zoomed back into the ranks of the fastest VPNs we’ve tested, causing us to lose just 13% of base internet speeds.
NordVPN doesn’t accept PayPal payments, but you can purchase a subscription with any major credit or debit card, AmazonPay, Google Pay or ACH transfer. If you’d rather pay anonymously, you can pay with a variety of cryptocurrencies including bitcoin, ethereum, tether and dogecoin. NordVPN has also partnered with a handful of retail stores like Staples, Best Buy and Walmart — where you can even purchase your VPN with cash.
Read more: NordVPN Review: Feature-Rich and Speedy, but Privacy and Transparency Issues Need Attention
Technologies
Google Says New Gemini 3 AI Model Is Its Most Capable Yet
Gemini 3 is available to all users in the Gemini app, along with powering AI Mode in Google Search.

Gemini 3, the latest AI model from Google, is the company’s most intelligent model to date, with more advanced multimodal and vibe coding capabilities, the company said in a blog post on Tuesday. It’s available now.
Google says Gemini 3 is «built to grasp depth and nuance» and is better at understanding the intent behind a user’s request. The company also touted Gemini 3’s multimodal capabilities, such as its ability to turn a long video lecture into interactive flash cards or to analyze a person’s pickleball match and find areas for improvement.
Gemini 3 isn’t limited to the app. It’ll also be available in AI Mode in Search and, for Pro and Ultra subscribers, in AI Overviews. In AI Overviews, Gemini 3 can generate interactive elements.
Google DeepMind’s Demis Hassabis and Koray Kavukcuoglu said in a blog post that Gemini 3 Pro is less sycophantic, a problem that’s been plaguing AIs and leading to AI psychosis in some. It’s also more secure against prompt injection attacks, in which bad actors try to make an AI ignore its original instructions and perform unintended actions.
The company also unveiled Google Antigravity, a new agentic development platform. Google says Antigravity is like having an active partner while making tools or working on projects, autonomously planning and executing complex software tasks while validating its own code. It works in tandem with Gemini 2.5’s Computer Use model for browser control and works with nano banana, Gemini 2.5’s image model.
Gemini 3’s new, more powerful, agentic capabilities will only be available to $250/month Google AI Ultra subscribers at first. This will allow the Gemini Agent to do multi-step workflows, like planning a travel itinerary.
Read more: AI Essentials: 29 Ways You Can Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts
Google’s release of Gemini 3 comes as an AI war is heating up between it, OpenAI, Anthropic and xAI. Google’s consistently been leading AI leaderboards, although other AI models haven’t been far behind, sometimes trading spots at the top. With the release of Gemini 3, Google seems to be trying to solve for some of AI’s more annoying problems, like hallucinations or sycophancy. It’s also trying to prove that AIs can be truly agentic, being able to accomplish tasks on the user’s behalf. Other agentic models have proven to be problematic in real-world usage and run into various security concerns, especially in web browsers.
The latest AI release from Google also comes at a time when there are fears of an AI bubble forming in the stock market. AI companies, including Nvidia, Google, Meta and Microsoft, account for 30% of the S&P 500. Google currently has a valuation of $3.4 trillion. Even Google CEO Sundar Pichai says the trillion-dollar AI investment boom has «elements of irrationality» and that a burst would affect every AI company, in an interview with the BBC. Still, if Google is to keep its stock price moving upward, it needs to demonstrate that its AI models beat the competition.
Technologies
Analogue 3D Review: The Purest Nintendo 64 Experience You Can Have on a 4K TV
There are plenty of ways to play Nintendo 64 games in 2025. The Analogue 3D is made for purists.
Pros
- Perfect playback
- Incredible sound reproduction
- Beautiful design
- Competitively priced
- Overclocking
Cons
- Wireless controllers need direct line-of-sight
- Barebones UI
- Missing screenshot feature
- No Wi-Fi
- Doesn’t support flash carts
As a kid, my parents promised to buy me a Nintendo 64 if I brought home straight A’s on my report card. I was having trouble staying motivated in class, but playing Mario Kart 64 at my cousin’s house lit a fire under me, one that was in awe of speed-boosting mushrooms and spiny blue shells. I’d never experienced anything like it, and I wanted it for myself.
I didn’t get the Nintendo 64. I ended up depositing my report card console credit for a Sega Dreamcast instead, lured by a gory late-night commercial for Sonic Adventure 2.
In the 25 years since then, I’ve wondered how my gaming journey would have evolved if I’d opted for the Nintendo 64. Instead of my childhood being defined by Crazy Taxi and Jet Grind Radio, it’d have been marked by the tunes of Kokiri Forest from the Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time or the accordions of Cool, Cool Mountain in Super Mario 64. I’d certainly be listening to less of The Offspring.
Luckily for myself and others like me, Analogue, the retro video game company known for releasing modern versions of old-school consoles, believes it’s time for the Nintendo 64 to make a comeback. In creating the Analogue 3D, as the new console is called, the company shuns the corners cut by all the knock-off emulation handhelds flooding AliExpress and TikTok Shop in its aim for absolute purity.
The Nintendo 64 was Nintendo’s third at-home video game console (if you don’t count the Japan-only Color TV-Game), and the first to go all-in on 3D. Despite commendations from gamers for its genre-defining titles, it wasn’t a tremendous seller, with only 32.93 million units sold worldwide. By comparison, the original Nintendo Entertainment System sold 61 million units, and the Wii sold 101 million. The highest-selling Nintendo home console is the Switch, which sits at 154 million machines sold to date. But it looms large in the minds of Millennial gamers like myself as the technological turning point when Mario and other iconic characters made the leap to 3D.
In the years since the Nintendo 64 was surpassed by newer, more advanced consoles, most gamers wanting to get back into N64 gaming have had to do so either by finding old systems at garage sales, downloading emulators or playing titles via the Nintendo Switch Online service. Each of these methods has specific drawbacks, from availability to compatibility with today’s 4K TVs, making it difficult to find the definitive Nintendo 64 experience in 2025.
The Analogue 3D aims to solve the conundrum of playing N64 games — from the cartridges themselves, if desired — on modern televisions, just as modders have been finding new ways to make old hardware work with today’s TVs. Products like the N64 HDMI Retro GEM modify an existing Nintendo 64 by inserting native HDMI output and scaling the signal for higher-resolution screens. This mod bypasses the need for flimsy composite-to-HDMI video adapters or other expensive scaling devices while also delivering a pure digital video signal. The problem is that at $210, the kit is expensive and requires intermediate-level soldering.
By contrast, the Analogue 3D is ready to go out of the box, natively supports HDMI output and internal scaling and forgoes the need to make risky modifications to an old console. And at $250, Analogue’s device is a clean, headache-free, competitively priced all-in-one solution. It also includes a wireless controller. Although ModRetro, which released the Chromatic Game Boy handheld earlier this year, is working on its own modern Nintendo 64 and says it’ll be priced at $200.
Like past Analogue devices, the Analogue 3D has a clean design that evokes the refinement and sophistication of an Apple product. But in an era where playing N64 games can be done with little hassle via software emulators, the Analogue 3D will appeal to only the most hard-core of retro enthusiasts – or those that don’t want to fiddle with installing apps and hunting down ROMs via dubious websites.
4K Nintendo 64 sounds awesome but turns into a blocky mess
The Analogue 3D is easy to use. It quickly boots up, and the UI, while spartan, cleanly displays your collection of games and plays them as intended.
The 3D uses FPGA technology to re-create the original system’s hardware, down to the transistor level. This means when you plug in an old N64 cartridge, the new console runs the code as originally intended. There’s no software emulation here. The images you see and the sounds you hear are unfiltered, which, for purists, is the ultimate expression of their chunky gray cartridges that have been lying dormant for the past 30 years.
Because there is no software trickery, you can’t leverage some features found in software emulators. The in-game models in Mario Kart 64 still retain the same blocky pixels, whereas Project64, a popular open-source N64 emulator, can internally render games at higher resolutions, which makes the textures and geometry look sharper and clearer. There are other enhancements that users can implement to make the image look cleaner. Fans have also made 4K texture packs that make the 29-year-old kart racer look as if it were made for modern systems.
While the raw, unfiltered image coming out of the Analogue 3D might not compare with what software emulation can achieve, it does include a slew of filters.
Video game hardware from the 1990s and 2000s was made to work with televisions of that era. The N64’s original 320×240-pixel video output was designed to scale on lower-resolution TVs that had scanlines running across them. This softened the image and helped blur the jagged pixels. Analogue has included multiple filters and scaling solutions that faithfully showcase N64 games as they were meant to be seen. On-board filters can simulate the screens of broadcast video monitors, production video monitors and cathode ray tube televisions. I personally prefer the image from BVM or PVM.
This, I feel, is where the divide will lie between purists and emulation enthusiasts. The purist doesn’t want to play with a clean, unfiltered image and prefers some kind of filter that portrays N64 games on the medium they were originally intended for. For those who grew up with emulation, however, they might prefer the cleaner upscaled image, which presents better on modern televisions and displays. For this latter group, sticking to Project64 or Nintendo Switch Online might be the more ideal option.
N64 emulation on Nintendo Switch can’t match the Analogue 3D’s sound
In jumping back and forth between my copy of Mario Kart 64 on the Analogue 3D and the version available via Nintendo Switch Online, one thing that immediately struck me was the depth and richness of sound through the former solution.
When playing on the 3D, the music was fuller, and, to my surprise, had surround sound support. Bass had a pronounced umph and speakers reverberated tonal clarity that the Switch Online couldn’t match. Honestly, the N64 games available on Switch sounded meek in comparison.
When researching online, the N64 could output stereo audio (and Dolby Pro Logic surround) at 44.1kHz at 16-bit. This sample rate, however, was computationally expensive and games would often lower the audio quality as a result. The Analogue 3D can push audio out at 48kHz/16-bit PCM.
Analogue says it sourced high-quality HiFi components that cost dollars each, versus cheaper ones that only run a few cents. In springing for pricier parts, the company compared the console’s more impressive audio output to the difference between Spotify’s standard 128kbps playback to full-sound lossless audio formats. According to Analogue, its console is the first HiFi N64.
Considering how wildly better games sounded via the 3D, I’m inclined to believe Analogue.
Lowest latency
Input latency has long plagued N64 software emulation. It’s a problem that Nintendo itself ran into when it added N64 games to its Nintendo Switch Online service (along with a slew of other issues). Since the Analogue 3D isn’t doing software emulation, input latency is virtually non-existent.
When playing Mario Kart or Super Smash Bros., input quality was generally fast via the included 8BitDo 64 Bluetooth Controller. We didn’t have an original wired N64 controller on hand to test wired input.
Oddly, it seems that the Analogue 3D itself needs a clear line of sight with a connected controller, or else it’ll lag badly. I’m unsure why this is, but prospective buyers should make sure that the 3D is clearly visible under their television or else they’ll run into issues.
Yes, the Analogue 3D overclocks
Toward the end of the Nintendo 64 lifecycle, a few games were released that really pushed the original hardware. This includes iconic titles like Perfect Dark, Donkey Kong 64 and Conker’s Bad Fur Day. For our testing, we didn’t have access to these games. But the Analogue 3D does have overclock options to eke out some extra horsepower for smoother gameplay.
This technically isn’t cheating on Analogue’s part. Nintendo actually sent out more powerful development kits to developers toward the end of the N64 lifecycle, according to Analogue. Some of these games never came to light, but some titles did suffer from choppy framerates as a result.
The games we had on hand weren’t as technically demanding. But upping the horsepower on the 3D on more visually complex tracks in Mario Kart, like Sherbet Land, played without issue.
PilotWings 64 is another game that had frame rate issues when it launched in 1996. The game itself runs at an uncapped frame rate. In our testing, the game was smooth when the 3D was in its experimental overclocked mode.
Sorry, no flash carts… yet?
Some Nintendo 64 games are expensive. Obscure titles like Clay Fighters and Super Bowling can cost north of $500 on eBay or other online secondary markets. More in-demand titles with greater availability, like The Legend of Zelda: Majora’s Mask and Pokemon Stadium 2, can run for between $40 and $60. Unless you’re already sitting on a decent N64 collection, getting the most out of an Analogue 3D will cost money.
Over the years, however, flash cartridges have emerged, letting gamers load dumped ROMs onto a single cartridge via an SD card. This allows one cartridge to be able to play an entire library of backed-up titles. The Everdrive 64 X7, made by Ukrainian developer Krikzz, is considered to be the gold standard of N64 flashcarts. However, unofficial cartridges don’t work with the Analogue 3D.
Analogue documentation says it’s up to the vendor to allow for Analogue 3D support. When contacted, Krikzz support said Analogue didn’t reach out regarding compatibility and isn’t sure why the Everdrive 64 X7 isn’t working, but he hopes to get it figured out soon.
No regrets
Even though it had a short life, the Sega Dreamcast was an awesome video game system. I don’t regret getting it over the N64. Sure, it didn’t feature Mario or Zelda, but it did offer memorable experiences that shaped my video game journey.
Over the years, I have been able to play many of the Nintendo 64’s best titles, most of which were ported to subsequent Nintendo systems. But those ports sometimes came with odd quirks and compromises. The Legend of Zelda: Majora’s Mask 3D for the Nintendo 3DS apparently had some odd jump timing, which made traversing the game more of a hassle. It was also less challenging. This is an instance where I’d like to hunt down an original N64 version of the game and play it as it was originally designed.
Given the overall quality, I do believe the Analogue 3D is worth the $250 price tag. I don’t think it’ll appeal to all buyers, however. There will be a contingent of gamers who will be content with playing the handful of titles via Nintendo Switch Online or through an emulator on their computer. Given the level of enhancements available on the emulation side of things via modders, it might even be better. The Analogue 3D is specifically catered toward purists, those who want to play on original hardware. For this reviewer, there really isn’t anything else like the Analogue 3D. Well, not yet.
While I didn’t get to extensively experience the Nintendo 64 as a kid, the Analogue 3D is giving me back what I missed out on. And in that sense, given how good the new 3D console is, maybe opting to get a Dreamcast back in 2001 gave me the opportunity to experience N64 games at their best — even if it took a few decades.
Technologies
Is an iPhone 17 Upgrade Worth It? Here’s How It Compares to Apple’s Older Models
The latest iPhone boasts upgrades to the display, cameras and battery. Is it worth the switch?
Apple’s flashy orange iPhone 17 Pro might be getting a lot of attention, but the baseline iPhone 17 is quietly crushing it, with preorders blowing past last year’s phone. So if your current iPhone is starting to feel a little outdated, this could be the time to upgrade.
But is the iPhone 17 worth it? For starters, here’s one huge perk: Apple finally killed the laughably small 128GB base storage you’ll get on older models like the iPhone16. Instead, the entry-level iPhone 17 starts at 256GB, all while maintaining that $829 starting price — a long-overdue upgrade that makes this year’s phone a seriously compelling deal.
Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.
Several other noteworthy updates to the iPhone 17 make it feel like a tempting choice, even over the pricier iPhone 17 Pro models. At long last, Apple has extended a 1-120Hz display across its entire lineup, so you can have smoother scrolling and an always-on display without spending upward of $1,100 on a Pro model. An anti-reflective coating and higher 3,000-nit peak brightness make the screen slightly easier to see outdoors. And camera upgrades help to level up photos and selfies.
Here’s how the iPhone 17 compares to older iPhones, ranging from last year’s iPhone 16 to 2020’s iPhone 12.
iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 16
Appearance-wise, the iPhone 17 has a lot in common with the iPhone 16. But beneath the surface, there are some key differences.
The display goes from a meager 60Hz on the iPhone 16 to 120Hz on the iPhone 17 (at long last). That means the iPhone 17 finally supports an always-on display, so you can glance at the time and your notifications without waking the screen and enjoy smoother scrolling. A new anti-reflective coating helps reduce glare, especially in the bright outdoor conditions.
The iPhone 17 has a larger 6.3-inch display, versus the iPhone 16’s 6.1-inch screen, thanks to slimmer bezels. That can make viewing content slightly more immersive, though it won’t be a hugely noticeable difference. And a new Ceramic Shield 2 cover on the iPhone 17 offers three-times better scratch resistance, according to Apple, so you can worry a little less about etching into your phone’s screen (but maybe still get a screen protector to be safe).
The iPhone 16 and 17 have a 48-megapixel wide-angle camera, but the iPhone 17 bumps the ultrawide camera from 12 megapixels to 48 megapixels. The front-facing camera also gets upgraded from 12 megapixels (on the iPhone 16) to 18 megapixels on the iPhone 17. Both phones have a Camera Control button for quickly launching the camera and snapping photos.
A new Center Stage feature can automatically adjust selfie photos from portrait orientation to landscape to ensure everyone is in the shot, so you don’t have to manually rotate your phone to its side anymore. Dual Capture lets you simultaneously record on your front and back cameras. These upgrades are specifically catered to the latest iPhone lineup, so that they won’t be coming to older models like the iPhone 16, even with an iOS 26 update.
Battery life is a little longer on the iPhone 17. Apple says the iPhone 17 supports up to 8 hours more of video playback than the iPhone 16. This change aligns with improvements CNET noticed in our battery tests. In a 3-hour streaming test, for example, the iPhone 17’s battery dropped from 100% to 89%, while the iPhone 16 hit 86%. It’s an incremental update, but even a little more battery life is a welcome change. The iPhone 17 also supports up to 40-watt charging, which is a boost over the 25 watts you get with the iPhone 16, helping you top off your battery a little faster.
The bottom line: While the updates to the iPhone 17 help it stand out as an all-around solid device, the changes over last year’s iPhone 16 are incremental enough that there’s not much reason to upgrade — unless you’re really excited about that smoother display and faster charging. But for most people, subtle differences mean you should probably just hold onto your iPhone 16.
iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 15
The iPhone 15 has a lot in common with the iPhone 16, including a 48-megapixel wide-angle camera, a 12-megapixel ultrawide camera and a 6.1-inch display. The 6.3-inch display on the iPhone 17 has slimmer bezels to expand that real estate a bit, and the 48-megapixel ultrawide camera can lead to slightly sharper shots.
The baseline iPhone 15 doesn’t have an Action button that you can customize to launch various apps and functions, and instead has the more traditional ring/silent switch. The iPhone 17 has an Action button and a Camera Control button.
Both phones have a Dynamic Island cutout at the top of the display for showing alerts and Live Activities, such as the time your DoorDash order is arriving, flight updates and what song is currently playing.
With each generation, Apple touts longer battery life, so you can expect to get a couple more hours of video playback with the iPhone 17 than you would with the 15.
Perhaps the most significant difference between the iPhone 15 and 17 is that the iPhone 15 doesn’t have Apple Intelligence; those AI features only arrived on that year’s Pro models. If you upgrade to the iPhone 17, you’ll have access to writing and image editing tools, as well as newer features like Live Translation for calls and messages.
The bottom line: Like the iPhone 16, there aren’t many drastic differences between the iPhone 15 and 17, though upgrading will notably grant you access to Apple Intelligence. But the other hardware and software-related updates are relatively minimal, so you’re probably good keeping your iPhone 15 for at least another year.
iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 14
The iPhone 14 was the last Apple phone with a Lightning port and that’s one of most significant differences between it and the iPhone 17, which has a USB-C port. Upgrading to the iPhone 17 means you won’t have to rely on an outdated and limited-use charging cable anymore, and can instead use one that works with most of your other devices.
The baseline iPhone 14 also doesn’t have a Dynamic Island cutout in the display, as that feature launched with just the Pro models that year. Upgrading to the iPhone 17 will let you quickly tap into activities like your rideshare trip or flight information.
The iPhone 14 has a 12-megapixel wide and ultrawide-angle camera on the back, while the iPhone 17 bumps that to 48 megapixels across the board. The iPhone 17 also increases the front-facing camera’s resolution from 12 megapixels to 18 megapixels, while adding a new Center Stage selfie feature to automatically adjust between portrait and landscape images without you having to rotate your phone.
But the two phones also some key similarities, like having eSIM and satellite connectivity on board.
The bottom line: The iPhone 14 has the most noticeable differences with the iPhone 17. Upgrading could offer some fresh features like an Action button and, at last, a USB-C port, as well as Dynamic Island and an upgraded camera. But if you want to save some money and keep your current phone, you won’t be missing out on anything too drastic.
iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 13
The iPhone 13 has a similar A15 Bionic chip as the iPhone 14, and shares the same dual 12-megapixel camera system. But unlike the iPhone 14, the iPhone 13 doesn’t have crash detection or satellite connectivity, or camera features like Action mode for more stable videos.
At this point, your iPhone 13 may be showing its age. Upgrading to the iPhone 17 will give you access to newer features like Apple Intelligence, Dynamic Island, USB-C charging and the Camera Control and Action buttons. You might also notice faster speeds by switching to the iPhone 17, now that it’s been a few years since the iPhone 13 came out.
The bottom line: It may be time to upgrade to the iPhone 17 if you have an iPhone 13. It’s possible your phone is starting to show its age, and switching to Apple’s latest baseline will get you a longer-lasting battery, an upgraded camera, AI features and a handful of new hardware and software capabilities.
iPhone 17 vs. iPhone 12
Like the next couple of iPhones after it, the iPhone 12 has a dual 12-megapixel camera system, as well as a 6.1-inch display. Upgrading to the iPhone 17 will get you a slightly more immersive 6.3-inch display with thinner bezels, along with a 48-megapixel dual camera system.
The iPhone 12 lacks features like crash detection, satellite connectivity, Dynamic Island and USB-C charging. It also doesn’t support the Apple Intelligence suite of AI features for writing, photo editing, language translation and more.
It’s possible your iPhone 12 has become sluggish and your battery isn’t holding up like it used to. Taking age out of the equation, at launch, the iPhone 12 boasted up to 17 hours of video playback, while Apple says the iPhone 17 supports up to 30 hours. So there’s likely to be a noticeable difference between how long each phone can hold up.
The bottom line: Swapping your iPhone 12 for the iPhone 17 could be a smart move. There have been noticeable changes over the last several years, from the addition of the Action and Camera Control buttons to the introduction of Apple Intelligence. The swap to USB-C and expanded battery capacity can also make the newest iPhone more tempting; you won’t have to cling to your now-outdated Lightning cable. And you’ll likely notice faster speeds and higher performance across the board when switching from a 5-year-old device to the latest generation.
Apple iPhone 17 vs. Older iPhones
| Apple iPhone 17 | Apple iPhone 16 | Apple iPhone 15 | Apple iPhone 14 | Apple iPhone 13 | Apple iPhone 12 | |
| Display size, tech, resolution, refresh rate | 6.3-inch OLED; 2,622 x 1,206 pixel resolution; 1-120Hz variable refresh rate | 6.1-inch OLED; 2,556 x 1,179 pixel resolution; 60Hz refresh rate | 6.1-inch OLED; 2,556×1,179 pixels | 6.1-inch OLED; 2,532×1,170 pixels | 6.1-inch OLED; 2,532×1,170 pixels | 6.1-inch OLED; 2,532×1,170 pixels |
| Pixel density | 460ppi | 460 ppi | 460 ppi | 460 ppi | 460 ppi | 460ppi |
| Dimensions (inches) | 5.89 x 2.81 x 0.31 in | 5.81 x 2.82 x 0.31 inches | 2.82 x 5.81 x 0.31 in | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.31 in | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.3 in | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 in |
| Dimensions (millimeters) | 149.6 x 71.5 x 7.95 mm | 147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8mm | 71.6 x 147.6 x 7.8 mm | 147 x 72 x 7.8 mm | 147 x 72 x 7.65 mm | 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.4 mm |
| Weight (grams, ounces) | 177 g (6.24 oz) | 170 g (6 oz.) | 171g (6.02 oz) | 172 g (6.07 oz) | 6.14 oz; 174g | 5.78oz; 164g |
| Mobile software | iOS 26 | iOS 18 | iOS 17 | iOS 16 | iOS 15 | iOS 14 |
| Camera | 48-megapixel (wide) 48-megapixel (ultrawide) | 48-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) | 48-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) | 12-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) | 12-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultrawide) | 12-megapixel (wide), 12-megapixel (ultra-wide) |
| Front-facing camera | 18-megapixel | 12-megapixel | 12-megapixel | 12-megapixel | 12-megapixel | 12-megapixel |
| Video capture | 4K | 4K | 4K | 4K at 60 fps | HDR video recording with Dolby Vision up to 4K at 60 fps | 4K |
| Processor | Apple A19 | Apple A18 | A16 Bionic | Apple A15 Bionic | Apple A15 Bionic | Apple Bionic 14 |
| RAM + storage | RAM N/A + 256GB, 512GB | RAM N/A + 128GB, 256GB, 512GB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB | RAM NA; 128GB, 256GB, 512GB | 128GB, 256GB, 512GB | 64GB, 128GB, 256GB |
| Expandable storage | None | None (Face ID) | None | None | Undisclosed | Undisclosed |
| Battery | Up to 30 hours video playback; up to 27 hours video playback (streamed) | Up to 22 hours video playback; up to 18 hours video playback (streamed). 20W wired charging. MagSafe wireless charging up to 25W with 30W adapter or higher; Qi2 up to 15W | Undisclosed; Apple claims up to 20 hours of video playback (16 hours streamed) | Undisclosed; Apple claims 20 hours of video playback | No | No |
| Fingerprint sensor | None (Face ID) | None (Face ID) | None (Face ID) | None (Face ID) | Undisclosed; Apple lists 19 hours of video playback | Undisclosed; Apple lists 15 hours of video playback |
| Connector | USB-C | USB-C | USB-C (USB 2.0) | Lightning | No (Face ID) | No (FaceID) |
| Headphone jack | None | None | None | None | Lightning | Lightning |
| Special features | Apple N1 wireless networking chip (Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with 2×2 MIMO), Bluetooth 6, Thread. Action button. Camera Control button. Dynamic Island. Apple Intelligence. Visual Intelligence. Dual eSIM. 1 to 3,000 nits brightness display range. IP68 resistance. Colors: black, white, mist blue, sage, lavender. Fast charge up to 50% in 20 minutes using 40W adapter or higher via charging cable. Fast charge up to 50% in 30 minutes using 30W adapter or higher via MagSafe Charger. | Apple Intelligence, Action button, Camera Control button, Dynamic Island, 1 to 2,000 nits display brightness range, IP68 resistance. Colors: black, white, pink, teal, ultramarine. | Dynamic Island; 5G (mmw/Sub6); MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; eSIM; satellite connectivity | 5G (mmw/Sub6); MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; eSIM; satellite connectivity | No | No |
| US price starts at | $829 (256GB) | $799 (128GB) | $799 (128GB), $899 (256GB), $1,099 (512GB) | $799 (128GB), $899 (256GB), $1,099 (512GB) | 5G enabled; MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM) | 5G enabled; MagSafe; water resistant (IP68); wireless charging; dual-SIM capabilities (nano-SIM and e-SIM) |
-
Technologies3 года ago
Tech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года ago
Best Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года ago
Tighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года ago
Black Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 года ago
Verum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года ago
Google to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 года ago
Olivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
-
Technologies4 года ago
iPhone 13 event: How to watch Apple’s big announcement tomorrow