Technologies
CRISPR startup wants to resurrect the woolly mammoth by 2027
Colossal has landed $15m in funding to restore the woolly mammoth to the Arctic — and it thinks it can birth calves in four to six years.
You’ve heard of startups building computer chips, delivery drones and social networks. One called Colossal has a very different goal: bringing the woolly mammoth back from extinction by 2027 using CRISPR, a revolutionary gene editing technology.
The plan isn’t to re-create true woolly mammoths exactly but rather to bring their cold-adapted genetic traits like small ears and more body fat to their elephant cousins, creating a hybrid that can wander the tundra where mammoths haven’t been seen for 10,000 years. Colossal’s co-founders are Chief Executive Ben Lamm, who started five companies before this, and George Church, a Harvard Medical School professor with deep CRISPR expertise.
«Our true North Star is a successful restoration of the woolly mammoth, but also its successful rewilding into interbreeding herds in the Arctic,» Lamm said. «We’re now focusing on having our first calves in the next four to six years.»
It’s an interesting illustration of an imperative sweeping the tech world: Don’t just make money, help the planet too. Tesla’s mission is to electrify transport to get rid of fossil fuels that hurt Earth. Bolt Threads wants to replace leather with a fungal fiber-based equivalent that’s easier on the environment than animal agriculture. Colossal hopes its work will draw attention to biodiversity problems and ultimately help fix them.
Colossal has raised $15 million so far, led by investment firm Tulco. The startup’s 19 employees work at its Dallas headquarters and in offices in Boston and Austin, Texas, and it’s using its funds to hire more.
Artificial wombs and other technology spinoffs
Church said he expects spinoffs from the company’s biotechnology and genetics work.
«The pipeline of large scale genome engineering techniques can be applied to many other applications beyond de-extinction, and therefore [are] most promising for commercialization,» he said.
One technology ripe for commercialization is multiplex genome engineering, a technique Church helped develop that speeds genetic editing by making multiple changes to DNA at once.
Colossal also hopes to develop artificial wombs to grow its mammoth embryos. Just growing 10 woolly mammoths with surrogate elephant mothers isn’t enough to get to the large-scale herds the company envisions.
At the foundation of Colossal’s work is CRISPR. This technology, adapted from a method bacteria evolved to identify attacking viruses and chop up their DNA, is now a mainstay of genetic engineering, and Church has been involved since CRISPR’s earliest days.
Jurassic Park-style tourism? Nope
Selling or licensing spinoff technology is a somewhat indirect way of running a business. A more direct option is selling tickets to tourists. After all, humans already pay lots of money to see charismatic megafauna like lions, elephants and giraffes on African safaris. Seeing a creature that’s been gone for 10,000 years could add to the excitement.
But that’s not Colossal’s game plan. «Our focus is on species preservation and protection of biodiversity right now, not in putting them in zoos,» Lamm said. By re-creating woolly mammoths, Colossal can preserve the genetic legacy of Asian elephants that now are endangered.
Another candidate species Colossal wants to re-create is the woolly rhinoceros, a relative to the critically endangered Sumatran rhino.
Although Colossal doesn’t plan to build a tourist destination, it does have a woolly mammoth rewilding site in mind that sounds awfully close to Jurassic Park: Pleistocene Park. This area of about 60 square miles in northern Russia, named after the geologic period that ended with the last ice age, is where researchers Sergey and Nikita Zimov are trying to test their theories about the ecological and climatic effects of rewilding.
One Zimov idea is that woolly mammoths will trample snow and knock down trees. That, in turn, will restore grasslands that reflect more of the sun’s warming rays and eliminate insulating snow and forests so the ground cools more. And that means the ground will stay frozen instead of releasing its current store of carbon dioxide and methane greenhouse gases. About 260 billion to 300 billion metric tons of carbon could be released from thawing permafrost by 2300, scientists calculate, exacerbating the weather extremes and other problems caused by climate change.
Is species de-extinction a good idea?
There’s an appeal to the idea of de-extinction. Humans have dramatically altered the planet, and the United Nations estimates we threaten 1 million species with extinction as a result.
Colossal hopes its work will raise more attention to the biodiversity collapse. And it also plans to create detailed genetic descriptions of many endangered species «so we have the recipe if that species does go extinct,» Lamm said.
But is that really the best use of our resources to help the planet? No, some researchers believe.
Resurrecting species could have some benefits, but money would be better spent on trying to protect ones that are still around, a group of biologists argued in one paper published in Nature Ecology & Evolution. «Potential sacrifices in conservation of extant species should be a crucial consideration in deciding whether to invest in de-extinction or focus our efforts on extant species,» the researchers wrote.
But this isn’t government money Colossal is talking about, and Lamm argues that his startup’s work complements other conservation efforts. And, he argues, startups can move faster than government-funded work.
In a world dominated by climate crisis headlines, a startup that makes money with an ecosystem-improvement focus has special appeal. One investor, Zack Lynch of Jazz Venture Partners, is excited by software, hardware and biotech he expects Colossal will create.
At the same time, «these breakthroughs will help address issues such as land degradation, animal pollinator loss and other negative biodiversity trends,» Lynch said. Given how big our environmental problems are, you can see why an investor might be interested.
Technologies
Meta Confirms Testing of Premium Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp Subscriptions
The company says it’s testing paywalled premium sharing and AI features.
People using Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp may soon need to decide whether they want to pay extra for additional features beyond the free versions they’ve been using.
Meta confirmed that it’s planning to roll out and test premium subscription tiers for its three most popular services, which, according to the company, would unlock «special features and more control over how they share and connect,» according to a TechCrunch report detailing the changes.
Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.
A representative for Meta did not elaborate on subscription plans, but confirmed to CNET that TechCrunch’s story is accurate.
According to the report, this would differ from the Meta Verified badge offering aimed at businesses and internet content creators. Meta Verified starts at $15 and includes enhanced support options and protections against impersonation.
Instead, the new subscriptions that Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp users can expect will offer a broader Premium experience, but it’s unclear so far which specific features will be included. According to TechCrunch, AI will be a part of that mix with potential paywalls or extra access to AI image generators or AI agents as part of its plans. What bundles and subscriptions are offered could change based on customer feedback, Meta told TechCrunch.
Subscriptions for once-free social media services are now common, with LinkedIn, X (formerly Twitter) and Snapchat all giving people the option to pay more for extra features.
Technologies
I Avoided Using a Sports Watch Until I Tested This One by Garmin
Garmin Venu 4 Review: It’s the best-looking sports watch I’ve tested, with all the fitness metrics you need to level up your training, for a price.
Pros
- Week-long battery life in smartwatch mode
- Polished circular design
- Advanced fitness and recovery metrics
Cons
- $100 more than previous generation
- Software can feel sluggish
- UI is not as intuitive as other smart watches
Until the Garmin Venu 4 landed on my wrist, I mostly shied away from using dedicated sports watches from brands like Garmin or Polar as my daily driver. Part of that was imposter syndrome; I’m a fitness enthusiast, not a full-blown athlete (yet). But mostly, I wasn’t willing to accept the trade-offs that came with them: clunky software, limited smart features and designs that felt more like gym gear than something I’d want to wear all day.
The Venu 4 isn’t the only good-looking sports watch on the market, but it’s the first one that’s come close to convincing me to go all-in. It’s well-rounded (literally and figuratively) and packed with fitness features that don’t feel condescending to an athlete wannabe like me.
The line between sports watches and traditional smartwatches seems to get blurrier each year. Both Apple and Samsung now have rugged Ultra smartwatch lines, and sports watches are starting to look (and act) more like traditional smartwatches.
The Venu 4 feels like Garmin’s strongest attempt yet to bridge these two worlds. It goes all out on fitness features with advanced insights like training readiness and suggested workouts typically reserved for the top-tier Fēnix models, but has a design and a price that are approachable for people who live somewhere between casual fitness enthusiast and aspiring athlete.
The $550 price (for both 41mm and 45mm models) is $100 more than its predecessor, and upgrading from the Venu 3 makes sense only if you plan to use the data it provides. If you’re someone who mostly just wants the occasional workout tracking, then the Venu 4 will be overkill.
I may not be a full convert (yet), but after weeks of living with it day and night with the Venu 4, I get the Garmin obsession, and I can see how a sports watch could help me level up my fitness journey when I’m ready.
Venu 4 fitness: Garmin’s core strength
The Venu 4 supports what feels like every workout imaginable, from running and cycling to rowing, HIIT, and even golf course mapping. It supports multi-band GPS, which I found provided more accurate location tracking, even on trail runs without my phone. Heart rate tracking stayed impressively close to my Polar chest strap after the initial jump from resting to higher-intensity sprint.
Garmin’s strength isn’t just the sheer volume of data it collects, but how it helps you understand how those metrics impact your training. On the Venu 4, you get heart rate, breathing rate, blood oxygen, stress, ECG, skin temperature changes, HRV, and advanced sleep and menstrual cycle tracking.
On their own, these metrics can feel overwhelming or even meaningless. What Garmin does especially well is connect the dots through features like Body Battery, Training Readiness, Load and other recovery insights that translate raw data into a clearer picture of how prepared your body is for activity. And because you’re not constantly taking it off to charge, Garmin can build a more complete picture of your health and recovery that becomes more accurate over time.
I found waking up to a low Body Battery score when I felt off was both depressing and validating: no, I probably can’t just «shake this one off,» and yes, I should probably take a rest day (or two) before getting back to that New Year’s resolution.
The watch also highlights when you’re theoretically at your best to work out, even if real life doesn’t always cooperate. There’s no greater irony than seeing I’m in «peak» training readiness while rocking my toddler to sleep, or hustling to get a story in on time. That’s ultimately my biggest barrier to fully crossing over into the Garmin ecosystem. I’m not always in a position to follow the advice that makes these metrics most valuable.
Garmin Connect Plus subscribers ($7 per month) get access to personalized coaching plans and daily suggested workouts that adapt based on their sleep, recovery and activity history. I tried a running plan to prep for a 10K, but by day three, I’d gone rogue and settled back into my tired, but realistic, workout routine. Learning new routines takes time, and at this stage of life, 20-minute workouts squeezed between everything else will have to suffice.
Venu 4 battery life: Amazing for a smartwatch, but meh for a Garmin
The Venu 4’s shiny new upgrades (brighter display and improved GPS tracking over the Venu 3) come at a slight cost to battery life: You get 12 days on the Venu 4 versus 14 on the Venu 3. But I think it’s well worth it when you factor in everything else it has.
I averaged about 10 days of battery life per charge for the smaller 41mm Venu 4 that I tested. But that’s in smartwatch mode, which disables the always-on display. If, like me, you prefer the always-on display, battery life drops. I got roughly four days on a charge (slightly less on long hiking days when the GPS was running). It’s not quite multiweek endurance like Garmin’s Enduro or Instinct lines. But even at the lower end, the Venu 4 is still far better than most Apple and Samsung watches.
I’ve never worn a smartwatch this long without taking it off for a charge, which turns out can be both a good and a bad thing. On the plus side, it made sleep tracking more consistent, which is key to unlocking Garmin’s best features like Body Battery, HRV (heart rate variability) and recovery insights. Wearing the watch for so long is also important for identifying long-term health trends and detecting early signs of illness.
The flip side of wearing it nonstop was skin irritation. After about five straight days, the skin directly under the watch became red and itchy. I tried to power through it, which only made things worse. A perfect storm of winter weather, a suppressed immune system, and the polymer backing on the underside of the watch likely didn’t help matters. After taking a week off, cleaning it more regularly, and giving my skin the occasional break, the issue hasn’t returned. And if you have sensitive skin like me, it’s probably worth building in a little breathing room.
Venu 4 design: Not your average sports watch
The Venu 4 is hands down one of the best-looking watches I’ve tested (Note: I didn’t say sports watches). It even earned its fair share of compliments from friends who didn’t know it was a sports watch. The Venu 4 comes in two sizes, 41mm and 45mm, both with a 1.4-inch AMOLED screen and a stainless steel case in lunar gold, slate, or silver finishes. It’s covered in Gorilla Glass 3 and has a fiber-reinforced polymer back.
The bezels are larger than those on an Apple Watch Series 11, and the usable screen area feels smaller than expected. The Venu 4’s display is bright and legible even in direct sunlight. You might not find it as responsive to touch if you’re coming from an LTPO OLED or Super AMOLED display with a higher refresh rate, like those on Apple or Samsung watches. Which is why the physical button navigation is so important.
Garmin slimmed the design down to two physical buttons (the Venu 3 had 3). One button brings up navigation, while the other handles quick settings. Long-pressing the bottom button activates other actions, like the flashlight, but until muscle memory kicks in, it’s easy to forget which one does what.
The built-in LED flashlight is a standout feature. It’s an actual light embedded in the side of the watch, not a screen-based workaround like found on other smartwatches. It’s surprisingly powerful and incredibly useful, whether you’re doing an ultramarathon or, in my case, checking on a sleeping kid without turning on any lights.
Venu 4 watch basics: Functional, but not seamless
On paper, the Venu 4 checks most of the smartwatch boxes. It has notifications, mobile payments via Garmin Pay, music storage, voice assistant access (via your phone) and supports calls from your wrist. Android phone owners get the added perk of responding to texts from the watch; iPhone owners are out of luck.
In my testing, this is where Garmin still lags behind true smartwatches. Everything works, but it’s not seamless; simple actions often take more steps than they should, and Garmin’s app ecosystem remains limited. Even changing your watch face requires an additional phone app (Garmin IQ). The upside is cross-platform compatibility, and aside from the ability to respond to texts, the experience is consistent across iOS and Android.
Venu 4 accessibility features
Garmin has also added more accessibility options in the Venu 4. There are spoken watch faces that read out time and health data, hourly audio alerts, and multiple color filters for people with color blindness.
Venu 4: Final thoughts
I’m still a practical generalist in the throes of working motherhood, but the Garmin Venu 4 is the closest I’ve been to going full sports watch. If I were ready to make fitness a true priority, the Venu 4 would be my gateway Garmin watch.
It’s a solid pick for anyone looking to cross over into the sports watch world for the first time, and it’s one of Garmin’s most well-rounded options. The Venu 4 has enough battery to get you through the week, training insights that feel genuinely helpful rather than overwhelming, and a design that’s polished enough to pass for date-night-ready.
Technologies
Marathon: Release Date, Open Preview Weekend and More
Bungie’s extraction shooter has a new release date, and it’s coming soon.
Marathon is the next game from Bungie, the acclaimed studio behind the Halo and Destiny franchises. The developer’s new game was originally set to come out last September, but the lukewarm reception it received from players who tried out the game’s alpha test led Bungie to delay the release to give it some fine-tuning.
It appears Bungie is ready to try again, as it confirmed that Marathon will be released this March. The company revealed the new release date on Jan. 19, when the pre-order trailer for the game was uploaded to YouTube.
Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.
When does Marathon come out?
Marathon will be released on March 5 for PC, PS5 and Xbox Series X|S consoles and will cost $40.
Will there be a Marathon playtest?
Yes. The official Marathon X account posted on Jan. 19 that there will be an open preview weekend before the game’s launch.
What is Marathon?
Marathon is an action first-person shooter series developed by Bungie, first released in 1994 for the Apple Macintosh. It and the following two games of the original Marathon trilogy are science fiction mysteries set in the 28th century, when humans travel across space in starships. One of them, the UESC Marathon, is attacked by aliens until only a lone security guard, the player, is left to fight them off. Players discover that the ship’s artificial intelligence, called Durandal, has gone sentient and evil, and even called aliens to attack the ship. The following games have players uncovering the mysteries behind Durandal and other ancient AIs that have been manipulating alien races.
The series was Bungie’s first hit, and it was innovative in its time for revealing story segments through computer terminals, where you could read messages from the different AI running the ship, as well as crew diaries.
In this new version of Marathon, players will visit Tau Ceti IV, the planet that humans from the UESC Marathon settled. The year is 2893, and something has caused many of the colonists to disappear. Survivors have formed different groups to savage what they can from the colony. The people doing the savaging are known as «Runners,» who are humans trained in combat and who use cybernetic modifications to survive on the planet. Players will create their own Runner to get loot and learn what happened to the colony as they fight off aliens as well as other Runners.
What is an extraction shooter?
An exaction shooter is a type of online multiplayer game where the focus isn’t just about killing enemies or other players. Instead, the objective revolves around scavenging loot and completing missions.
To make things exciting, players can only extract loot at designated locations in the game world. And to complicate things even further, the start of the extraction process will include some signal that alerts both enemies and players within the vicinity. This means you’ll have to defend yourself for a short period of time from what could be waves of computer-controlled enemies or human players who may or may not try to steal your loot.
Some of the most popular extraction shooters out right now are Arc Raiders, Escape from Tarkov and Helldivers 2.
How is Marathon related to Halo?
Marathon was Bungie’s first hit series, but it was Halo that made the developer a household name. While the two game franchises do not have any firm narrative connections, there have always been subtle references to the Marathon games in Halo. Bungie has said that Halo is more of a spiritual successor to Marathon, but there are fan theories connecting Marathon, Halo and even Bungie’s other major franchise, Destiny.
-
Technologies3 года agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies3 года agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies3 года agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies4 года agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies5 лет agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 лет agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 года agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
-
Technologies4 года agoiPhone 13 event: How to watch Apple’s big announcement tomorrow



