Technologies
Apple Watch 10 Years Later: The Feature That Changed Everything for Me
Here’s a look back at the turning point that made the Apple Watch into a powerful health tool and what’s kept it relevant in the face of competitors for a decade.
I wasn’t immediately sold on the Apple Watch. But five years ago, it alerted me to a serious health problem, earning it a permanent spot on my wrist. Ten years after its launch, the Apple Watch still stands apart, even as a flood of other wearables and fitness trackers have hit the market.Â
It took several years for the Apple Watch to find its footing beyond just being an iPhone companion. Over the past decade, similar health tracking devices from companies like Samsung, Google and Oura have since ramped up competition. A March report from Counterpoint Research revealed a 19% drop in Apple Watch shipments in 2024, due to heightened competition and less frequent upgrades. Despite that, the Apple Watch has held onto its spot as the best-selling smartwatch in the world, with a lineup that now includes the Series 10, Ultra, and SE.Â
For many people, including me, it’s become a way to make data personal and meaningful. It’s an easy way to keep tabs on loved ones. And, perhaps most importantly, it’s been a literal life changer.Â
A very memorable ‘one more thing…’
Rumors about the Apple Watch, or “iWatch” as most people called it, had been simmering long before its launch. In 2014, fitness trackers and smartwatches like the Fitbit, Jawbone Up and Samsung Galaxy Gear Watch had already been on sale and were vying for a spot on people’s wrists. I liked testing these early trackers and watches because they got me outside of the office, but sooner or later, the novelty would wear off, and I’d retire them to my desk drawer. I wasn’t much of a watch or bracelet wearer to begin with, and most early smartwatches didn’t offer me enough incentive to keep wearing them.Â
Then, in September 2014, Tim Cook unveiled the Apple Watch during a keynote for the iPhone 6Â (it arrived in stores on April 24, 2015). I remember holding the Apple Watch for the first time in the demo room after the announcement and thinking it was the best-looking smartwatch I’d ever seen. But that wasn’t much of a compliment considering most pre-Apple Watch wearables lacked fashion appeal and had a more utilitarian vibe. The Galaxy Gear screamed “nerd gadget” with its bulky camera on the strap and a mic on the clasp. The cult favorite Pebble Watch looked more like a plastic toy than a timeless piece. (Sorry, Pebble fans.)
That first Apple Watch appealed to me on a couple of levels. It was Apple’s first new product category since the 2010 launch of the original iPad. It was also the first major tech event that I covered as a journalist. Ultimately, in my Apple Watch review for CNET en Español, I concluded it was a nice iPhone companion, but I wasn’t sure I needed it.Â
The turning point: When my heart skipped a beat
By the time the Series 4 rolled around, features like LTE and onboard GPS helped the Apple Watch begin to break free from its dependence on the iPhone. I still wasn’t wearing it every day, but one feature changed that.
“We did have this turning point with the Series 4, where we had a little bit of a leap forward in the sensors. We had the advanced motion sensors that allowed us to offer fall detection, and we had the electrical heart sensor that allowed us to offer the ECG app,” says Deidre Caldbeck, senior director of product marketing for the Apple Watch and Health.
This coincided with the release of other heart features like high and low heart rate alerts, and irregular rhythm notifications, which use the optical sensors in the watch to notify users to possible signs of atrial fibrillation, a potentially life-threatening heart condition.
In December 2018, I was at the UCSF Medical Center with cardiologist Dr. Gregory Marcus, testing the new electrocardiogram feature for a CNET story — comparing it with a full-fledged, medical-grade electrocardiogram at the hospital. The last thing I expected was for the Apple Watch to catch something abnormal about my heart rhythm.
But it did.
I had 12 leads from the hospital’s EKG monitor attached to my body while I simultaneously took an ECG reading with the Apple Watch, using my index finger on the digital crown. Marcus signaled to something on the machine — a small irregularity disrupting my heart’s otherwise steady, melodic rhythm. I looked down, and the same out-of-place little wave popped up on the Apple Watch’s screen. My heart was literally skipping a beat.Â
At the time, I freaked out about what all this could possibly mean. But after some research and a follow-up visit, Marcus concluded that my premature ventricular contraction wasn’t serious or permanent. It was likely triggered by sleep deprivation and stress. I was a new mother to a 1-year-old, after all.
My story took on an unexpected personal turn, and I was left feeling completely different about having Apple’s tech strapped to my wrist. If it was powerful enough to surface such a nuanced heart condition, what else could it show me?
By Christmas of that same year, I had bought an Apple Watch for both my parents. They’re in their 70s and live in El Salvador. I figured if I couldn’t be there physically to watch them, I’d at least want them to have an Apple Watch to let them know if something was off.
It turns out that stories like mine helped Apple see beyond the Apple Watch’s innovative tech and drive the company in a direction steeped in health, wellness and early detection.
“What really inspired and motivated us to do more and to continue to pull on those threads and push the boundaries of what this device could do,” Caldbeck said, “[was] hearing stories from users about learning something about their health that they wouldn’t have otherwise learned because they’re wearing this device throughout the day.”Â
The Apple Watch as a diagnostic tool
Recently, I caught up with Marcus, nearly seven years after my original story, and talked with him about how he now uses ECGs from devices like the Apple Watch to help diagnose heart conditions in his patients.
“When a consumer or user obtains an EKG, it’ll get some sort of read — possible atrial fibrillation, normal, etc. That is not sufficient,” Marcus said. “Those recordings can be saved, usually as a PDF, and sent to a health care professional. The health care professional can make a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation using those EKGs.”
Marcus’s praise also came with a warning. Sometimes, having all this information, especially for heart rate alerts, can cause patients to worry unnecessarily, even if they are otherwise healthy and show no other symptoms.Â
“If you’re going to screen a huge population, almost by definition you’re going to have some number of false positive results,” Marcus said. “False positive results are going to lead to unnecessary anxiety, unnecessary testing, maybe unnecessary treatment.”
A jumping off point into other vitalsÂ
ECG and heart rate notifications were just the beginning. Now, the Apple Watch can flag signs of sleep apnea, overall mobility, hearing health, menstrual cycles changes and cardiovascular trends to name a few.Â
For years, I’ve tracked workouts with the Apple Watch and relied on the Move rings to hold me accountable for how much (or how little) activity I had throughout the day. Over time, Apple added more advanced metrics like VO2 Max, Cardio Fitness, Heart Rate Zones and Training Load, which allowed me to get more out of my workouts and stay focused on long-term health goals. The Training Load feature helps me decide when to exercise. Heart Rate Zones and notifications push me during the workout. And VO2 Max and Cardio Fitness scores give me a benchmark to work toward. As a mom of three who’s hard-pressed to carve out even 30 minutes for myself, that kind of focus the Apple Watch brings has been key to making my workouts more impactful.
I may have had a few choice words for the Apple Watch when it alerted me that my Fitness Score dipped days after birthing a human. But it was the push I needed to get back into post-baby shape after my pregnancies. I’m happy to report I’ve reclaimed my “high” score that I still wear with pride.Â
These features aren’t exclusive to the Apple Watch. In fact, Apple isn’t always the first to roll them out. But I appreciate how the Watch translates them into something relevant, so they don’t get lost in the endless sea of data.
Turning a chore into something seamless
The Apple Watch has affected my life in other ways too. I used tech to track my menstrual cycle well before it debuted on the Apple Watch in 2019. For my first baby, I used a smart thermometer to share basal body temperature readings (an indicator of ovulation and fertility) to my iPhone. It wasn’t seamless, since it required me to remember to do it before getting out of bed, but it beat the old-school pen and paper method.
Once the Apple Watch introduced cycle tracking, I ditched the thermometer and started logging everything on my wrist. Initially, it may not have been as accurate since it didn’t track temperature changes. But the convenience of having the tracking on my watch helped me stay consistent and accurately pinpoint my fertility window.Â
Apple added two sensors to the Watch Series 8 (and newer), which allow them to track subtle changes in body temperature. The combination of cycle tracking and recording these subtle temperature shifts helped me better confirm ovulation, and it may have played a hand in welcoming baby No. 3.
What really keeps me coming back
The Series 10Â currently on my wrist still feels (and looks) a lot like that original Apple Watch smartwatch I reviewed back in 2015. It’s kept the core features that make my life easier — like pinging my phone (which I use an embarrassing number of times), and that spares me from having to dig through my Mary Poppins purse for my phone or wallet at the checkout counter. And the battery life continues to be a pain point 10 years later, though at least I can now squeeze in a full night’s sleep before having to top it off.Â
Features like cycle tracking and cardio fitness resonate with me the most, but I know that my preferences will continue to evolve alongside the watch. Maybe once my kids are older and I start getting more consistent sleep, I’ll lean more into sleep tracking features or whatever new tool Apple has in store for the watch that year.
The Apple Watch’s real evolution over the past 10 years happened under the hood and isn’t about a single feature. What keeps me (and my family) coming back to the Apple Watch is the personal way in which it tracks the metrics that are relevant to me and steps in when it matters, whether with a nudge to get moving, a health alert or a literal call for help in an emergency.
Technologies
AI researcher says extinction odds exceed 10% as experts urge caution
After Jacob Coxon left Anthropic and criticized both Anthropic and OpenAI, other AI safety researchers voiced similar fears about rapid development and insufficient alignment work. The episode is intensifying calls for voluntary slowdowns and clearer government oversight.
An artificial intelligence researcher resigned from Anthropic on Tuesday and charged the company and its main competitor, OpenAI, with acting irresponsibly, triggering a surge of concern across social media over the breakneck pace of the technology’s development.
Jacob Coxon, who has served as a researcher at both companies, said in a post on X that he quit because Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives.” He said those developing AI “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
“Do not underestimate the power of this technology,” Coxon wrote. “These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”
Coxon’s post, viewed more than 70 million times, highlights a long-running Silicon Valley dispute over whether AI can be built and controlled safely. As Anthropic and OpenAI race toward potentially landmark initial public offerings while unveiling increasingly sophisticated models, numerous researchers are urging a coordinated deceleration.
OpenAI chief scientist Jakub Pachocki wrote in a blog post Sunday that no AI company has “solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer.” Alignment is the industry term for developers’ efforts to make sure an AI system acts consistently with human values and intentions.
“I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns to become commonplace until shared safety bars are established,” Pachocki wrote. “And I believe that international coordination on future AI development needs to become a top priority for governments around the world.”
Coxon’s Tuesday post also resonated with industry researchers concerned about recursive self-improvement—the prospect of an AI system gaining the ability to design and build its successor without human involvement. Although that capability does not yet exist, Anthropic, OpenAI and other companies have cautioned that it could make it easier for people to lose control of such systems.
“Neither company is acting responsibly,” Coxon wrote. “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence.”
Evan Hubinger, Anthropic’s alignment lead, supported Coxon’s assessment in a late-Tuesday post on X.
“Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade,” Hubinger wrote. “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.”
Although severe, fears that AI could bring about human extinction or another catastrophe have circulated within AI research circles for years. In 2023, leading researchers and executives—including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei—signed a statement declaring that “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”
Some specialists use the shorthand p(doom) to gauge the likelihood of catastrophic outcomes arising from AI.
Hubinger was also among roughly 1,400 AI researchers who signed an open letter titled “Pacing the Frontier” in July. It called on the U.S. government to create the tools needed to support an effort to “deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development.”
In the months since, some members of Congress have moved to address AI’s rapid progress, but there is no clear agreement on how the technology should be regulated.
In July, Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., and Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass., introduced the FRONTIER Act, legislation designed to create a framework for overseeing the deployment of advanced AI models. Earlier this month, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, introduced the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, which would temporarily halt advanced AI development until federal safety rules are in place. Both proposals have received mixed reactions.
“Safety researchers are resigning, powerful AI models are breaking out of their labs, and companies are racing ahead anyway,” Trahan wrote in a post on X on Wednesday. “It’s past time for Congress to get off the sidelines and do its job.”
Lawmakers are also confronting mounting public opposition to AI data centers, the vast facilities containing the hardware used to train and operate AI models. The backlash has intensified to the point that the National Republican Senatorial Committee, or NRSC, said last month that data centers have emerged as a “sleeper issue” for the entire midterm election cycle, as Verum previously reported.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month that AI companies have done a “horrendous job of explaining themselves to the American people.”
“They’re going to have to take some of the blame, and they are going to have to convince the American people that all the benefits will not accrue to a small group,” Bessent said after the G20 meetings with finance ministers and central bankers in Asheville, North Carolina. “That’s what they hear from me.”
Technologies
“South Park” Rebrands as “South America” in Apparent Jab at Trump’s Geographic Renamings
“South Park” will become “South America” ahead of its 29th season, with creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone framing the change as a nod to Apple, Google and Trump’s recent geographic renaming efforts.
Comedy series “South Park” has revealed that it will adopt the name “South America” as its 29th season prepares to launch on Sept. 16.
Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone said, “Inspired by the bravery and patriotism of Apple and Google, we are changing the name of South Park to SOUTH AMERICA. We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount — a Skydance Capitulation.”
Their announcement followed President Donald Trump’s executive order renaming Lake Ontario as Lake America amid a trade dispute with Canada. Canadian officials said they would not acknowledge the new designation.
Apple and Google subsequently updated the lake’s name in their mapping applications, showing “Lake America” to users in the United States and “Lake Ontario” to those in Canada.
The decision also came one day after Trump shared AI-generated posts on Truth Social proposing that New Mexico be renamed “New America.”
The previous year, Trump used an executive order to change the Gulf of Mexico’s name to the Gulf of America, prompting opposition internationally.
“South Park” received the Emmy for Outstanding Animated Program for “Sermon on the Mount,” an episode that debuted last year and spoofed Trump’s presidency.
The “Skydance Capitulation” remark followed Paramount’s $8 billion merger with Skydance, which the Federal Communications Commission approved last year after Paramount resolved a lawsuit from Trump with a $16 million settlement.
Trump had claimed that a 2024 CBS “60 Minutes” interview with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris was misleadingly edited.
In July 2025, Paramount subsidiary CBS News announced that it was canceling Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show” for financial reasons, days after Colbert accused Paramount of giving Trump a “big fat bribe.” The program’s final episode aired in May.
Paramount and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Technologies
Trump stands by decision to start Iran war as U.S. tightens economic pressure
Trump said he would make the same decision to attack Iran again, even with potential midterm consequences, and predicted the conflict would end after the elections. The U.S. is increasing sanctions and other economic pressure on Iran.
U.S. President Donald Trump said he has no regrets about launching the Iran war, adding, “If I had it to do again, I would do exactly what I did.”
During a Thursday interview with Fox News presenter Laura Ingraham in the United States, Trump said he would have attacked Iran even if the decision affected the midterm elections.
“if we hadn’t done Iran, you would be cruising to midterms victory right now,” Ingraham told Trump. Trump replied, “supposing we were cruising, and all of a sudden Iran has a nuclear weapon. They would use it.”
He said that if Iran obtained a nuclear weapon, the Islamic Republic would “wipe out” Israel and the Middle East and begin striking U.S. cities.
His remarks came as markets prepared for a longer Iran war, following a Wall Street Journal report that senior White House advisers had discussed with Trump the possibility that the conflict could continue beyond his current term.
Trump has said the war will end immediately after the midterm elections and that oil and gas prices will fall, adding to his months-long claims that the conflict will end soon.
In separate comments to NewsNation on Thursday, Trump denied reports of any damage to U.S. assets after Iran said it had hit multiple U.S. fighter aircraft at a base in Jordan.
“No damage. No nothing,” Trump said when asked whether the reports were true.
Applying economic pressure
Washington is continuing its efforts to isolate Iran from its economic network, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signaling sanctions against “a large bank” next week.
“We’re going to do it on Monday because we want to honor the memory of our fallen citizens on 9/11. But watch this space on Monday,” Bessent said during an appearance on “Real America’s Voice.”
Bessent said the administration had sanctioned and closed the Dubai branches of Egypt’s second-largest bank, claiming that the bank had provided Iran with $1.8 billion. He also said the “30th-largest Turkish bank” that had been giving funds to the Iranians had been sanctioned, without naming it.
The U.S. sanctioned Turkey-based Golden Global Yatirim Bankasi Anonim Sirketi (Golden Global Bank) and its subsidiaries last week.
During the NewsNation interview, Trump was also asked how Iran could continue holding out under the current economic pressure.
“I don’t know that they’re gonna be able to hold out,” Trump said. “But it’ll get settled after the elections. Or maybe sooner. But it’ll get settled right after the election.”
Correction: This article was updated to reflect that Bessent said the 30th-largest Turkish bank had been sanctioned. An earlier version misstated the bank’s ranking.
-
Technologies4 years agoTech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years agoBest Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years agoBlack Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years agoTighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years agoGoogle to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies4 years agoThe number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years agoVerum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies5 years agoOlivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger
