Connect with us

Technologies

iOS 17.2 Brings Apple’s Journal App to the iPhone. It’s Not What I Expected

Commentary: I don’t use Journal every night, but even opening the app and looking back helps put time into perspective.

Apple has dropped iOS 17.2 for the iPhone, and it comes with one of the most eagerly awaited apps in recent memory: Journal.
Have you noticed that our iPhones have been trying to fix us? This little gadget in our pocket keeps track of so many aspects of our life, including our schedules, communication, money and health. It’s smart enough to suggest how to optimize our time spent using the device, remind us when our music is too loud, or point out how much time we spend looking at its pretty screen while scrolling through TikTok. 

Now Apple has another major selling point: Your iPhone can help you be a better you. Its new Journal app is designed to help you reflect and practice gratitude by writing about moments of your day. I’ve been using it for the past month, and there are aspects of the app that aren’t what I expected. 

Apple announced Journal back in June at WWDC. It’s part of iOS 17, but unlike other features, it needed more time to bake and wasn’t included in the September release of the new iPhone software. 

I’ve been testing it for a month, with the public beta version of iOS 17.2, and the Journal app is far more than just a place to jot down thoughts on blank pages. I have plenty of blank journals that I never write in (even though I keep buying them). Obviously, when I’m burnt out after a long day, I don’t grab my paisley Moleskine.

Instead, I do what any sane person does: scroll on my iPhone while in bed — so it makes sense to journal at night on my phone. I open the Journal app and click to make a post. There are personalized suggestions, called Moments, that give me something to write about. And when I say personalized, these suggestions from my iPhone get real detailed.

Reflections, suggestions, and that time I went to Wendy’s

Journal pulls from my recent activity, showing photos I took, people I texted, places I visited and music I’ve listened to. If I ever actually logged a workout on my Apple Watch, it would show me that, too. It also weaves in photo memories from years ago. There are also Reflections that present prompts, ideas and questions. The prompts aren’t cheesy, and I find them interesting, which is, of course, the idea. These thought exercises help me zoom out to see the bigger picture.

Reflections in the Journal app

Scrolling through my suggestions, there’s one of a Friday night hangout with friends, a photo of my son when he was little from three years ago, a question prompt, and a photo of my family picking out a Christmas tree from this past weekend. I see photos of my dad visiting New York in 2018, and I get a reminder that I ate at a Wendy’s last week. So not every moment is worthy of a post, but the suggestions give you little flashbacks that jolt your brain into replaying memories. 

Some suggestions can be strange. Journal knows that I went to a specific Wendy’s and wants me to write about it — clearly iPhone knows a lot about my life and burger consumption habits. Apple says all of this is being done while protecting your privacy. The suggested posts from your activities stay inside your iPhone, and Apple can’t see them. The same limits apply to any third-party journal apps that use Apple’s journal suggestion tool API in their software. 

Apple says no one but you can access your Journal. Even if your phone is unlocked and you hand it to someone, they can’t get into the app, because you can lock your Journal. I set it to unlock with Face ID. If you sync it to iCloud, it’s stored with end-to-end encryption. 

My Journal always hits me with photo memories of my kids, trying to give me a dopamine hit with nostalgia. Like, «Hey, remember this cute moment?» My problems today aren’t so big if I think about nice stuff that happened in the past. It’s like having a therapist guide you to reset your perspectives.

tooth

Imperfect memories and limits

There are some hiccups. For example, once I got my nails done early in the morning and the app assumed I was having breakfast at a restaurant next door. I suppose it’s OK if it’s not perfect since it’s just meant to be a starting point for your dear-diary moment. You don’t have to write a post for every suggestion. 

Journal lets you add photos, audio or video to your entries, but there are limits. For instance, video files need to be under 500 megabytes, so I couldn’t add a two-minute video that I shot in 4K. Since your entries are stored locally on your iPhone, limiting the size of your media files in Journal helps save space.

On the surface all this makes sense: «Yeah, you got a fancy digital diary!» So what I’m about to say next may sound weird. There’s no way to share any of these posts. And it isn’t just no sharing, it’s no searching. I can’t go, «Oh yeah, I remember that nice Halloween post I made, let me pull that photo up and share it.» Nothing is shareable. You’re crafting what look like classic Facebook posts, but they’re just for you. No one will know about them. 

Too many years being on social media have messed me up, so I can’t fathom making content that no one else will see. I realize I have to rethink a few things about the value of writing about my memories.

17 Hidden iOS 17 Features and Settings on Your iPhone

See all photos

The lack of a search tool in the Journal app is a bummer, too. Searching is just scrolling back. The best you can do is bookmark some of your favorite posts, because then you can narrow down entries by filtering what’s bookmarked, or having it show you just photos, audio posts or locations. I guess scrolling is kind of like flipping through the pages of an actual handwritten journal. But then what’s the point of journaling digitally?

There’s also another wrinkle that took me a while to realize. Journal is just another way to lock you into iOS and the Apple ecosystem. Imagine that a year goes by and you made hundreds of posts, all of which are stored on your iPhone. Would you just throw away that diary and switch to Android?

I’m not the only CNET staffer who’s been testing out Journal in beta. Patrick Holland, CNET managing editor and iPhone reviewer, has also been playing with it. Here are his first impressions:

Journal’s secret sauce is triggering your emotions

Like Bridget, I’ve enjoyed the Journal app so far. But sadly, I haven’t had any prompts to relive that great Frosty-and-fries experience I had at Wendy’s. What surprises me about Journal is how un-Apple it is. The star of the app is the suggestions feature, and how easily a suggestion can trigger a memory or make me relive a moment that at the time seemed mundane, but now prompts a bunch of feelings.

Using Journal reminds me of the analog experiences I’ve had doing creative writing exercises or following the book The Artist’s Way. 

What Journal does best is gives me a space for my feelings and a way to organize my thoughts. The suggestions are very personal and private. One made me exit the app and call my family, while another made me wish I still could talk to someone who had died.

Final thoughts on Journal

I agree with Patrick and think Journal is worth trying out. Sure, there are things that could be tweaked, like adding a way to search for a post. But if the job of Journal is to help our mental health and fix some of the busy-brain problems we have in this day and age, it does that. It made me think about what really matters and offered a way to quickly switch my mindset. I don’t use Journal every night, but even opening the app and looking back helps put time into perspective.

CNET’s Patrick Holland contributed to this report.

I Took 600+ Photos With the iPhone 15 Pro and Pro Max. Look at My Favorites

See all photos

Technologies

AI Is Bad at Sudoku. It’s Even Worse at Showing Its Work

Researchers did more than ask chatbots to play games. They tested whether AI models could describe their thinking. The results were troubling.

Chatbots are genuinely impressive when you watch them do things they’re good at, like writing a basic email or creating weird, futuristic-looking images. But ask generative AI to solve one of those puzzles in the back of a newspaper, and things can quickly go off the rails.

That’s what researchers at the University of Colorado at Boulder found when they challenged large language models to solve sudoku. And not even the standard 9×9 puzzles. An easier 6×6 puzzle was often beyond the capabilities of an LLM without outside help (in this case, specific puzzle-solving tools).

A more important finding came when the models were asked to show their work. For the most part, they couldn’t. Sometimes they lied. Sometimes they explained things in ways that made no sense. Sometimes they hallucinated and started talking about the weather.

If gen AI tools can’t explain their decisions accurately or transparently, that should cause us to be cautious as we give these things more control over our lives and decisions, said Ashutosh Trivedi, a computer science professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder and one of the authors of the paper published in July in the Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics.

«We would really like those explanations to be transparent and be reflective of why AI made that decision, and not AI trying to manipulate the human by providing an explanation that a human might like,» Trivedi said.


Don’t miss any of our unbiased tech content and lab-based reviews. Add CNET as a preferred Google source.


The paper is part of a growing body of research into the behavior of large language models. Other recent studies have found, for example, that models hallucinate in part because their training procedures incentivize them to produce results a user will like, rather than what is accurate, or that people who use LLMs to help them write essays are less likely to remember what they wrote. As gen AI becomes more and more a part of our daily lives, the implications of how this technology works and how we behave when using it become hugely important.

When you make a decision, you can try to justify it, or at least explain how you arrived at it. An AI model may not be able to accurately or transparently do the same. Would you trust it?

Why LLMs struggle with sudoku

We’ve seen AI models fail at basic games and puzzles before. OpenAI’s ChatGPT (among others) has been totally crushed at chess by the computer opponent in a 1979 Atari game. A recent research paper from Apple found that models can struggle with other puzzles, like the Tower of Hanoi.

It has to do with the way LLMs work and fill in gaps in information. These models try to complete those gaps based on what happens in similar cases in their training data or other things they’ve seen in the past. With a sudoku, the question is one of logic. The AI might try to fill each gap in order, based on what seems like a reasonable answer, but to solve it properly, it instead has to look at the entire picture and find a logical order that changes from puzzle to puzzle. 

Read more: 29 Ways You Can Make Gen AI Work for You, According to Our Experts

Chatbots are bad at chess for a similar reason. They find logical next moves but don’t necessarily think three, four or five moves ahead — the fundamental skill needed to play chess well. Chatbots also sometimes tend to move chess pieces in ways that don’t really follow the rules or put pieces in meaningless jeopardy. 

You might expect LLMs to be able to solve sudoku because they’re computers and the puzzle consists of numbers, but the puzzles themselves are not really mathematical; they’re symbolic. «Sudoku is famous for being a puzzle with numbers that could be done with anything that is not numbers,» said Fabio Somenzi, a professor at CU and one of the research paper’s authors.

I used a sample prompt from the researchers’ paper and gave it to ChatGPT. The tool showed its work, and repeatedly told me it had the answer before showing a puzzle that didn’t work, then going back and correcting it. It was like the bot was turning in a presentation that kept getting last-second edits: This is the final answer. No, actually, never mind, this is the final answer. It got the answer eventually, through trial and error. But trial and error isn’t a practical way for a person to solve a sudoku in the newspaper. That’s way too much erasing and ruins the fun.

AI struggles to show its work

The Colorado researchers didn’t just want to see if the bots could solve puzzles. They asked for explanations of how the bots worked through them. Things did not go well.

Testing OpenAI’s o1-preview reasoning model, the researchers saw that the explanations — even for correctly solved puzzles — didn’t accurately explain or justify their moves and got basic terms wrong. 

«One thing they’re good at is providing explanations that seem reasonable,» said Maria Pacheco, an assistant professor of computer science at CU. «They align to humans, so they learn to speak like we like it, but whether they’re faithful to what the actual steps need to be to solve the thing is where we’re struggling a little bit.»

Sometimes, the explanations were completely irrelevant. Since the paper’s work was finished, the researchers have continued to test new models released. Somenzi said that when he and Trivedi were running OpenAI’s o4 reasoning model through the same tests, at one point, it seemed to give up entirely. 

«The next question that we asked, the answer was the weather forecast for Denver,» he said.

(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET’s parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

Explaining yourself is an important skill

When you solve a puzzle, you’re almost certainly able to walk someone else through your thinking. The fact that these LLMs failed so spectacularly at that basic job isn’t a trivial problem. With AI companies constantly talking about «AI agents» that can take actions on your behalf, being able to explain yourself is essential.

Consider the types of jobs being given to AI now, or planned for in the near future: driving, doing taxes, deciding business strategies and translating important documents. Imagine what would happen if you, a person, did one of those things and something went wrong.

«When humans have to put their face in front of their decisions, they better be able to explain what led to that decision,» Somenzi said.

It isn’t just a matter of getting a reasonable-sounding answer. It needs to be accurate. One day, an AI’s explanation of itself might have to hold up in court, but how can its testimony be taken seriously if it’s known to lie? You wouldn’t trust a person who failed to explain themselves, and you also wouldn’t trust someone you found was saying what you wanted to hear instead of the truth. 

«Having an explanation is very close to manipulation if it is done for the wrong reason,» Trivedi said. «We have to be very careful with respect to the transparency of these explanations.»

Continue Reading

Technologies

Snag These Clip-On Baseus Earbuds for a Record-Low Price of Just $47 While You Can

These open-ear buds were already a solid budget pick, and this deal makes them an even better buy.

While most earbud options fit tightly into your ears to help shut out any background noise, they aren’t for everyone. They can be uncomfortable, so picking up a pair of open earbuds is the go-to alternative for many.

These clip-on Baseus Bowie MC1 earbuds are a great option, and their usual $70 asking price is already a bit of a bargain. And they’re even better now that you can pick them up for just $47. You even get to choose from black and white colors when placing your order, too.

The Baseus Bowie MC1 earbuds are our pick for the best affordable option when it comes to open-ear earbuds. Our editors love them even at full price, so a chance to grab them for even less is an amazing value. They feature a unique clip-on design that wraps around your ears, making them secure and comfortable to wear.

Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money.

The buds offer up to 9 hours of battery life or up to 40 with the charging case, as well as an IP57 certification, which makes them splash- and dust-proof. Plus, they’re pretty good when it comes to phone calls.

Why this deal matters

Baseus’ Bowie MC1 earbuds are already our pick for the best affordable open-ear earbuds. So, when you can grab them at their lowest-ever price, you’ll get even more value out of them. Plus, ongoing tariff concerns mean these earbuds could be getting more expensive in the coming months, so grab yourself a pair while they’re still extremely affordable.

Join Our Daily Deals Text Group!

Get hand-picked deals from CNET shopping experts straight to your phone.

By signing up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to receive recurring marketing messages at the phone number provided. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Reply STOP to unsubscribe. Msg & data rates may apply. View our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Act Fast to Secure Anker’s Superb Soundcore Liberty 4 NC Earbuds While They’re 43% Off

These top-rated noise-canceling earbuds are excellent, especially while they’re just $57.

There are plenty of earbud options out there, but finding the right ones for you can feel nearly impossible as a result. Thankfully, if you’re after some of the best noise-canceling wireless earbuds, and you’d like to save some money, then we might have the answser for you.

The excellent Anker Soundcore Liberty 4 NC earbuds are currently on sale with 43% off, which means they’re down to $57. This is the lowest we’ve seen them, but this is also a limited-time deal, which means it’s not likely to last for long.

These earbuds have 11mm drivers, as well as hi-res wireless, LDAC technology and adaptive noise canceling that should reduce noise from your environment by up to 98.5%, according to Anker. That means you can stay immersed in the music (or other content you love) regardless of what’s going on around you.

Plus, because they’re equipped with six mics, they offer good call quality, regardless of your environment. We found them comfortable, too, and loved the bass they put out.

Hey, did you know? CNET Deals texts are free, easy and save you money.  

The Liberty 4 NC earbuds have an impressive battery life as well, offering up to 10 hours of playback per charge, with an additional 50 hours available with the charging case. And just 10 minutes of fast charging can get you up to four hours of playback. They’re also rated IPX4 water-resistant, so any inclement weather while you’re out shouldn’t cause these buds any harm.

Another great feature these earbuds offer is multipoint connection, which lets you connect to your phone and your computer at once, which is super convenient. That’s a lot of features for earbuds this affordable.

If you’re not totally sold on this model, be sure to check out our roundup of all the best headphone and earbuds deals happening now. 

Why this deal matters

These excellent earbuds are discounted fairly close to their record-low price right now. During Black Friday we saw these Liberty 4 NC buds hit a new low of $60, and right now, they’re $3 cheaper still. Amazon has labeled this as a limited-time deal, so we expect it to expire soon.

Join Our Daily Deals Text Group!

Get hand-picked deals from CNET shopping experts straight to your phone.

By signing up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to receive recurring marketing messages at the phone number provided. Consent is not a condition of purchase. Reply STOP to unsubscribe. Msg & data rates may apply. View our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.

Impulse Buys Under $25 on Amazon That Make Surprisingly Great Gifts

See all photos

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media