Connect with us

Technologies

10 Best MacBook Pro Alternatives for 2022

Think differently about your laptop options with these MacBook Pro alternatives.

Fortunately for Apple users, the company has made some much-needed changes to MacBook Pro in the latest generations. That means no more awful keyboard, annoying Touch Bar or overreliance on Thunderbolt/USB-C connections.

But the fact remains that there are far more designs, feature sets and display choices for Windows laptops and Chromebooks. Moreover, Windows remains the preferred platform for playing games locally. While cloud gaming lets Macs circumvent the gaming problem to a certain extent, only a fraction of the universe of games is playable via the cloud. Thankfully, there are MacBook Pro alternatives on the market.

This list is a great place to start to get an idea of what’s available. If you need advice on whether a particular type of laptop or two-in-one is right for you, jump to our laptop FAQ at the bottom of the list.


Commonly asked questions

Which is faster, a MacBook or a Windows laptop?

That’s an almost impossible question to answer.

For one thing, it’s a moving target. We’re starting to see Windows models featuring Intel’s new 12th-gen CPUs, which has the same hybrid core architecture as Apple’s M1 chips, as well as new mobile GPUs. We haven’t yet had a chance to test out many of these next-gen models, but it’s safe to assume that Apple’s M1 processors will be facing some stiff competition.

And thus far, Apple hasn’t even launched an M1 MacBook with a discrete GPU, though its integrated graphics seem to scale up to compete with current low-end Nvidia and AMD graphics up to about the RTX 3070 and Radeon RX 6800M, and definitely improves on previous Intel-based Macs though neither is really surprising. But it means that at the high end we’re still in sort of a MacBook holding pattern when it comes to comparisons with heavier Windows options.

Plus, differences in operating systems complicate things. Mac OS has long been more efficient than Windows and that’s only improved now that Apple owns its entire food chain. But it doesn’t need to worry about compatibility with partner systems and myriad different components. Then toss in difficulties getting repeatable, comparable, representative and broad-based benchmark results for cross-platform comparisons… well, I don’t feel like going down that rabbit hole right now.

Is a MacBook Pro better for content creation than a Windows laptop?

Once again, a difficult question to answer because there’s no sweeping generalizations you can make. If you’re basing the concern on Windows’ old reputation for being inferior for graphics work, it was accurate at the time but is no longer true.

Screens on Windows laptops have come a long way, and convertibles (aka two-in-ones) mean you can paint or sketch directly on the laptop screen. With a MacBook you’d need to buy an iPad as well.

Some graphics applications are only available on one platform or the other, so figuring out which ones you need and which you can switch away from is the first thing to decide before you choose between Windows and MacOS. Also consider that MacOS no longer supports 32-bit applications, so if you’ve got an old favorite that hasn’t been updated — this happens most with small utilities — but still exists on Windows, that’s something to think about.

Some applications may also be better optimized for one platform than the other, or rely on a specific GPU from AMD or Nvidia for their best acceleration. Since you can’t really use an Nvidia card with a Mac and none of the M1 MacBooks incorporate any discrete graphics, Windows is probably a better bet, especially for programs that rely on Nvidia’s CUDA programming interface. Think about any accessories you need, as well — the drivers and utilities you need to use them may not be available or be stripped down on one or the other.

MacBooks may run faster than equivalently configured Windows laptops simply because MacOS is a lot more tightly integrated with the hardware than Windows can ever be on its side of the fence. Microsoft simply has to support a much wider variety of hardware than Apple will ever need to, and that adds performance overhead; this can be especially important for activities sensitive to latency, like audio recording. Windows’ flexibility is both its strength and its weakness.

More computing recommendations

Technologies

Target Is Latest Chain to Warn of Price Hikes Amid Tariff Uncertainty

Continue Reading

Technologies

Google Beam Futuristic AI-Powered 3D Video Chats Are Coming This Year

Google Beam uses an AI model that turns video calls into a lifelike 3D experience. It could be the next best thing to being there.

Beam me up, Google. Video chats could have a much more sci-fi feel with Google Beam, an AI-powered video communications platform that aims to make it feel like you’re meeting up in person. 

Google announced Beam, an evolution of its Google Starline technology, at its annual I/O developer conference on Tuesday. Google has teamed up with HP to commercialize the system. 

Read more: Google I/O 2025 Live Blog

Google Beam uses a six-camera array that captures the subject from different angles. An AI video model puts the views together in real time to create a 3D person. Google says the system features near-perfect head tracking, down to the millimeter, with video at 60 frames per second.  

The idea is reminiscent of any number of holographic communications systems seen in everything from Star Wars to Star Trek. Unlike the tiny, low-quality Princess Leia hologram from A New Hope, Beam is designed to be life-sized and lifelike. Google once described the technology as a «magic window.»

The platform uses a light field display that doesn’t require wearing any special equipment. CNET’s Abrar Al-Heeti tried out Starline last year and called it «the closest thing to a hologram I’ve ever seen.»

Speech translation, a feature Google is bringing to Google Meet, could come to Beam as well, Google said.

Google introduced Starline as a research project in 2021 and has been testing and refining prototypes ever since. Today’s announcement means the technology is closing in on being ready for prime time.

Video calls have long been plagued with challenges. It can be hard to read expressions and gestures. Traditional video chats are missing a sense of eye contact. Zoom fatigue was a hot topic during the height of COVID-19. Beam wants to address those issues with a more immersive and lifelike experience.

Google said HP will share more about the platform at the InfoComm audio visual technology exhibition in June. Google is also working with Zoom and other audio visual companies. Beam will likely find its footing first with larger organizations that want to shake up the way they handle videoconferencing.

The first Beam devices will be available for early adopters later in 2025, so start practicing your «Help me, Obi-Wan Kenobi. You’re my only hope.»

Beam isn’t Google’s only big announcement of the day. Check out everything that’s been revealed at Google I/O.

Continue Reading

Technologies

Samsung Reportedly Wants OLED Screens on Switch 2 Refresh

One of the major complaints about the Switch 2 might be addressed in the future.

When Nintendo revealed the Switch 2 on April 2, there was a lot of excitement over the powered-up portable console. However, some gamers weren’t thrilled about its LCD screen. But, like the original, it appears there might be a Switch 2 with a better display in the works.

Samsung is the display maker for the Switch 2 and is reportedly pushing for a version of Nintendo’s new console to come with an OLED screen, according to a report from Bloomberg on Tuesday. No specifics were provided on whether this variant of the Switch 2 would come out or if Nintendo was committed to it. 

Nintendo and Samsung didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The Switch 2 is only weeks away from launching on June 5. The new console has some significant upgrades over the original Switch, including the larger 7.9-inch 1080p LCD screen, a custom Nvidia processor that outputs graphics better than a PS4 but less than a PS5 and 4K video with a max frame rate of 120fps. 

There have been, however, some concerns over the Switch 2. The big one is its price. At $450, the Switch 2 would be Nintendo’s most expensive console. Coupled with that is the fact that the system will also have its first regularly priced $80 game with Mario Kart World. While the big price tag of the Switch 2 makes sense, considering its components, Nintendo has yet to provide an explanation of why it needs to sell a game for $80, which is $10 more than the typical price of new AAA games. 

Nintendo released its Switch OLED in 2021, four years after the console’s launch. It was $50 more expensive than the original, had a slightly bigger screen and made some other small design adjustments, such as a better kickstand. 

If Nintendo does release a Switch 2 with OLED sometime in the future, the cost of this new console could be more than just an additional $50. The same day the Switch 2 was announced, President Donald Trump released a list of tariffs for US trade partners. Nintendo’s home country, Japan, and the two countries that produce Nintendo’s products — China and Vietnam — were subject to large tariffs. This led Nintendo to delay preorders in the US. 

Since then, Trump has instituted tariff freezes, and Switch 2 preorders were made available for US gamers. However, there is some uncertainty over whether the Switch 2 will stay at its $450 price or see an increase due to tariffs. Microsoft has already increased the price of its Xbox Series consoles, and it appears that Sony might do the same soon. 

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © Verum World Media