Technologies
Experts weigh in as researcher says AI has more than 10% chance of ‘killing all humans’
Jacob Coxon said in a post on X that Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives.”

An artificial intelligence researcher quit his job at Anthropic on Tuesday and accused the company, and its chief rival, OpenAI, of acting irresponsibly, igniting a frenzy of concern on social media about the rapid pace of the technology’s development.
Jacob Coxon, who has worked as a researcher at both companies, said in a post on X that he resigned out of concern that Anthropic and OpenAI are “gambling with our lives.” He said the people building AI “earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”
“Do not underestimate the power of this technology,” Coxon wrote. “These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources.”
Coxon’s post, which has been viewed more than 70 million times, reflects a long-standing debate in Silicon Valley about whether AI can be safely developed and controlled. As Anthropic and OpenAI barrel toward potentially historic initial public offerings while releasing increasingly advanced models, many researchers are calling for a coordinated slowdown.
OpenAI’s chief scientist, Jakub Pachocki, published a blog post on Sunday and warned that no AI company has “solved alignment and monitoring to a sufficient degree to continue responsibly scaling at maximum speed for much longer.” In the AI industry, alignment refers to the work by AI developers to ensure that the system behaves in accordance with human values and intentions.
“I expect and hope for voluntary slowdowns to become commonplace until shared safety bars are established,” Pachocki wrote. “And I believe that international coordination on future AI development needs to become a top priority for governments around the world.”
Coxon’s post on Tuesday also struck a chord with industry researchers who are worried about recursive self-improvement, or an AI system becoming capable of designing and developing its successor without human intervention. Recursive self-improvement is not yet possible, but companies, including Anthropic and OpenAI, have warned that it would make it easier for humans to lose control over those systems.
“Neither company is acting responsibly,” Coxon wrote. “They are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence.”
Evan Hubinger, an alignment lead at Anthropic, echoed Coxon’s comments in a post on X late Tuesday.
“Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade,” Hubinger wrote. “I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.”
While extreme, concerns about the potential for AI to cause human extinction or other catastrophic events are not new in AI research circles. In 2023, for instance, prominent AI researchers and executives, including OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, signed a statement that said “Mitigating the risk of extinction from AI should be a global priority alongside other societal-scale risks such as pandemics and nuclear war.”
Some experts even use a shorthand, p(doom), to estimate the probability of dire outcomes that could stem from AI.
Anthropic’s Hubinger was also one of roughly 1,400 AI researchers who signed an open letter called “Pacing the Frontier” in July. The letter urged the U.S. government to develop the tools necessary to support an effort to “deliberately pace the frontier of automated AI development.”
Some members of Congress have taken steps to try and address AI’s rapid advancement in the months following, but there’s no clear consensus about how the technology should be regulated.
In July, Rep. Jay Obernolte, R-Calif., and Rep. Lori Trahan, D-Mass., introduced a bill called the FRONTIER Act, which aims to establish a framework for governing the deployment of advanced AI models. And earlier this month, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep. Greg Casar, D-Texas, introduced a bill called the Ban Artificial Superintelligence Act, which would temporarily pause advanced AI development until the federal government establishes safety rules. Both bills have been met with mixed receptions.
“Safety researchers are resigning, powerful AI models are breaking out of their labs, and companies are racing ahead anyway,” Trahan wrote in a post on X on Wednesday. “It’s past time for Congress to get off the sidelines and do its job.”
Lawmakers are also trying to navigate growing public backlash against AI data centers, the large facilities that house the hardware for training and running AI models. The pushback has grown so intense that the The National Republican Senatorial Committee, or NRSC, said last month that data centers have become a “sleeper issue” for the entire midterm election cycle, as CNBC previously reported.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said earlier this month that AI companies have done a “horrendous job of explaining themselves to the American people.”
“They’re going to have to take some of the blame, and they are going to have to convince the American people that all the benefits will not accrue to a small group,” Bessent said, following the G20 meetings with finance ministers and central bankers in Asheville, North Carolina. “That’s what they hear from me.”
Technologies
U.S. denies claims Iran struck two American vessels in retaliation for earlier strikes
The U.S. denied Iran’s claim that it struck two American vessels as the two sides traded attacks near the Strait of Hormuz and Brent crude hit $100 a barrel.
The U.S. has denied a claim by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard that its forces struck two American vessels.
The Guard had said it struck the ships, along with eight oil tankers in the Gulf, in retaliation against the U.S. for destroying five Iranian tankers on Tuesday. It said the targeted vessels had attempted to cross an area of the Hormuz Strait it had designated “forbidden and unsafe,” according to a statement published by semiofficial Tasnim News Agency.
But U.S. Central Command responded later on Wednesday, saying, “No U.S. Navy warship has been struck; all IRGC attempted attacks failed.”
“Meanwhile, U.S. forces have successfully destroyed 10 Iranian tankers in just the last week. These vessels were part of a multibillion-dollar shadow network that funds the IRGC, and Iran cannot defend them,” Centcom added on X.
Brent crude hits $100 a barrel
The conflict pushed Brent crude to $100 a barrel on Wednesday, as the two sides traded strikes along one of the world’s most critical oil corridors.
The U.S. strikes on Iranian crude oil tankers on Tuesday followed the Revolutionary Guard firing ballistic missiles at an American warship twice over the past two days, according to Centcom.
The U.S. warship successfully evaded Iranian attack, and no American personnel were harmed, Centcom said in a statement Tuesday.
U.S. forces struck four tankers in the Gulf of Oman, Centcom said. They are the M/T Kaviz, M/T Charminar, M/T Horizon 1 and M/T Riesco. The military hit the M/T Derya near Iran’s Kharg Island. “American forces directed the crews to abandon ship before the vessels were struck and rendered inoperable,” Centcom said.
The U.S. and Iran have traded new attacks in the Persian Gulf in recent days, rekindling hostilities in the region even as the Trump administration shifts its strategy toward defeating Tehran economically.
Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, in a post on X late Tuesday, dismissed the U.S. sanctions as a rehash of a failed strategy. “After failing to achieve its aims through sanctions or war, Washington’s ‘novel’ solution is…more sanctions. Seriously?”
The U.S. military destroyed three Iranian tankers on Saturday in retaliation for the Guard firing ballistic missiles at an aircraft carrier and a guided-missile destroyer. Those attacks also failed, Centcom said.
Earlier Tuesday, Centcom said an unmanned submersible that Iran reportedly seized in the Strait of Hormuz was “defective” and carried no sensitive data or classified equipment.
“An underwater drone operated by U.S. forces malfunctioned more than a day ago,” U.S. Navy Captain Tim Hawkins told CNBC in a statement shared by U.S. Central Command.
The drone “was surveying regional waters in support of ongoing operations,” Hawkins said, adding, “U.S. operations in area waters continue.”
Iran’s Revolutionary Guard had boasted earlier Tuesday that it trapped and captured “one of the most modern, intelligent, unmanned submarines of the American terrorist army at the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz,” according to a translated post from Iranian state news outlet Fars.
Fars later posted videos and images purporting to show the vessel out of the water.
But Hawkins’ statement insisted that the drone was hardly a crucial piece of cutting-edge military tech.
“The defective drone was an older model that neither collected sensitive data nor carried any classified sonar or radar equipment,” the captain’s statement said.
Iranian media outlets described the sub as a Dive-LD, an autonomous undersea vehicle developed by U.S. defense contractor Anduril. They cost $2.5 million each, DefenseScoop reported in 2024.
“Dive-LD is an attritable autonomous system, meaning it is designed from the outset to operate in dangerous environments where loss of the vehicle is an expected possibility,” an Anduril spokesperson told CNBC when asked about the drone seizure. “Its purpose is to keep warfighters out of the most dangerous parts of the undersea mission. This vehicle had already delivered significant value operating thousands of hours in months-long operations in CENTCOM.”
The spotlight on the watercraft offers the latest example of the U.S. military’s increasing dependence on autonomous tech to fight the war in the Middle East.
This summer, unmanned boat startup Saronic used one of its drone vessels to rescue crew from a helicopter downed in the Hormuz Strait. Saronic’s boats were later used in a strike on an Iranian submarine and ship facility.
— CNBC’s Samantha Subin contributed to this report.
Technologies
Brent crude oil tops $101 to close at highest level since May as fighting escalates in Persian Gulf
Oil prices extended gains on Wednesday as escalating tensions between the U.S. and Iran fueled concerns over further disruptions to Middle East energy supplies.
Crude oil prices jumped more than 3% on Wednesday as fighting between the U.S. and Iran escalates in the Persian Gulf, raising investors’ fears that energy exports through the Strait of Hormuz will fall.
Brent futures
The U.S. military destroyed five Iranian crude oil tankers Tuesday in retaliation for attempted attacks on an American warship. The U.S. warship successfully evaded Iranian attack and no American personnel were harmed, U.S. Central Command said.
Fuel prices are hitting new records in the U.S. as war in the Middle East escalates again.
Gasoline prices hit a Labor Day record high of $4.15 per gallon on Monday. Diesel is expected to hit $6 per gallon for the first time ever in the coming days, said Patrick De Haan, head of petroleum analysis at GasBuddy, in a social media post Wednesday.
The escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict, now in its seventh month, is raising the risk of oil prices surging above $120 a barrel as attacks on shipping intensify, said Daan Struyven, co-head of global commodities research at Goldman Sachs, in an interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia.”
Goldman’s base case remains for Persian Gulf exports to gradually recover as producers adapt to disruptions, including through alternative shipping routes and eventually additional pipeline capacity.
But the recent escalation has increased the chances of a more bullish scenario in which exports fail to recover in the coming months due to attacks on tankers, Struyven said.
The U.S. and Iran largely refrained from fighting for about a month after an outburst of violence in July. Washington has pivoted to applying economic pressure on Tehran. But fighting has erupted again as Iran continues to attack commercial traffic in and around Hormuz.
Technologies
‘South Park’ Renamed ‘South America,’ Apparently Reflecting Trump’s Geographic Name Changes
“South Park” has announced that it will be renamed “South America” as its 29th season approaches. The move appears to echo recent U.S. geographic name changes associated with Donald Trump.
The television comedy series “South Park” has revealed that it will be renamed “South America” as the show prepares to launch its 29th season on Sept. 16.
Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone wrote, “Inspired by the bravery and patriotism of Apple and Google, we are changing the name of South Park to SOUTH AMERICA. We especially want to thank our parent company Paramount — a Skydance Capitulation.”
The statement followed U.S. President Donald Trump’s executive order changing Lake Ontario to Lake America during a trade dispute with Canada. Canadian officials said they would not acknowledge the new name.
Apple and Google subsequently updated Lake Ontario in their map apps, with U.S. users seeing “Lake America” while Canadian users continued to see “Lake Ontario.”
The change also came one day after Trump shared AI-generated posts on Truth Social suggesting that New Mexico should be renamed “New America.”
Last year, the president signed an executive order changing the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, prompting international opposition.
“South Park” received an Emmy for Outstanding Animated Program for the “Sermon on the Mount” episode, which aired last year and satirized Trump’s presidency.
The “Skydance Capitulation” remark followed the $8 billion merger between parent company Paramount and Skydance, which was approved by the Federal Communications Commission last year after Paramount settled a lawsuit filed by Trump for $16 million.
Trump had claimed that an interview aired on CBS’s “60 Minutes” in 2024 with then-presidential candidate Kamala Harris was deceptively edited.
Paramount subsidiary CBS News said in July 2025 that it was ending comedian Stephen Colbert’s “The Late Show,” citing financial reasons, just days after Colbert accused Paramount of paying Trump a “big fat bribe.” The program’s final episode aired in May.
Paramount and the White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
-
Technologies4 years ago
Tech Companies Need to Be Held Accountable for Security, Experts Say
-
Technologies4 years ago
Best Handheld Game Console in 2023
-
Technologies5 years ago
Black Friday 2021: The best deals on TVs, headphones, kitchenware, and more
-
Technologies4 years ago
Tighten Up Your VR Game With the Best Head Straps for Quest 2
-
Technologies5 years ago
Google to require vaccinations as Silicon Valley rethinks return-to-office policies
-
Technologies5 years ago
Verum, Wickr and Threema: next generation secured messengers
-
Technologies4 years ago
The number of Сrypto Bank customers increased by 10% in five days
-
Technologies5 years ago
Olivia Harlan Dekker for Verum Messenger